DOCSLIB.ORG

Young Et Al., 2014)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Young Et Al., 2014) bs_bs_banner Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 113, 854–871. With 11 figures Marine tethysuchian crocodyliform from the ?Aptian-Albian (Lower Cretaceous) of the Isle of Wight, UK MARK T. YOUNG1,2*, LORNA STEEL3, DAVIDE FOFFA4, TREVOR PRICE5, DARREN NAISH2 and JONATHAN P. TENNANT6 1Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, The King’s Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, UK 2School of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK 3Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK 4School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK 5Dinosaur Isle Museum, Sandown, Isle of Wight PO36 8QA, UK 6Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW6 2AZ, UK Received 1 February 2014; revised 5 May 2014; accepted for publication 7 July 2014 A marine tethysuchian crocodyliform from the Isle of Wight, most likely from the Upper Greensand Formation (upper Albian, Lower Cretaceous), is described. However, we cannot preclude it being from the Ferruginous Sands Formation (upper Aptian), or more remotely, the Sandrock Formation (upper Aptian-upper Albian). The specimen consists of the anterior region of the right dentary, from the tip of the dentary to the incomplete fourth alveolus. This specimen increases the known geological range of marine tethysuchians back into the late Lower Cretaceous. Although we refer it to Tethysuchia incertae sedis, there are seven anterior dentary characteristics that suggest a possible relationship with the Maastrichtian-Eocene clade Dyrosauridae. We also review ‘middle’ Cretaceous marine tethysuchians, including putative Cenomanian dyrosaurids. We conclude that there is insufficient evidence to be certain that any known Cenomanian specimen can be safely referred to Dyrosauridae, as there are some cranial similarities between basal dyrosaurids and Cenomanian–Turonian marine ‘pholidosaurids’. Future study of middle Cretaceous tethysuchians could help unlock the origins of Dyrosauridae and improve our understanding of tethysuchian macroevolutionary trends. © 2014 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 113, 854–871. ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: Dyrosauridae – Ferruginous Sands Formation – Pholidosauridae – Sandrock Formation – Tethysuchia – Upper Greensand Formation. INTRODUCTION tooth count (e.g. Koken, 1887; Mook, 1933, 1934; Wu, Russell & Cumbaa, 2001; Jouve et al., 2005a, 2006a; Tethysuchian crocodyliforms were a highly successful Barbosa, Kellner & Viana, 2008). Tethysuchia was group, some of which returned to a marine lifestyle one of several crocodyliform clades that survived the during the latter part of the Mesozoic and early end-Cretaceous mass-extinction event, with the Cenozoic. Many species superficially resembled subclade Dyrosauridae continuing to radiate and extant gharials in having enlarged supratemporal diversify during the Palaeocene and Eocene (e.g. fenestrae, an elongate, tubular snout, and a high Buffetaut, 1976, 1978, 1982; Jouve, 2005, 2007; Jouve et al., 2005a, 2006a; Jouve, Bouya & Amaghzaz, 2005b, 2008; Barbosa et al., 2008; Hill et al., 2008; Hastings et al., 2010; Hastings, Bloch & Jaramillo, *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] 2011, in press). However, the origins of this clade are 854 © 2014 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 113, 854–871 CRETACEOUS TETHYSUCHIAN FROM UK 855 poorly understood owing to a paucity of fossils from This has important implications for tethysuchian the ‘middle’ Cretaceous. evolution, in particular for our understanding A phylogenetic definition of Tethysuchia was of dyrosaurid origins, and whether dyrosaurids recently proposed by Andrade et al. (2011: S102) as: and the marine ‘pholidosaurids’ Terminonaris and ‘the clade composed of Pholidosaurus purbeckensis Oceanosuchus constitute a single marine radiation or (Mansel-Pleydell, 1888) and Dyrosaurus phospha- several independent ones. ticus (Thomas, 1893), their common ancestor and all One of the major issues hampering resolution in its descendants’. This definition encompasses these analyses is the paucity of ‘middle’ Cretaceous Dyrosauridae and Pholidosauridae, and possibly (Barremian–Turonian) marine tethysuchians, thus Elosuchidae. Although curiously, this is not the affecting our understanding of character polarity. In case in the phylogenetic analysis of Andrade those phylogenetic analyses in which ‘pholidosaurids’ et al. (2011), as Elosuchidae was recovered are paraphyletic, all potential dyrosaurid sister taxa outside the Pholidosaurus + Dyrosaurus clade. (Elosuchus, Oceanosuchus, and Terminonaris) are Moreover, Andrade et al. (2011) proposed that from this time span (see Mook, 1933, 1934; Wu et al., Elosuchidae be used for the clade consisting of 2001; de Lapparent de Broin, 2002; Hua et al., 2007). Elosuchus, Sarcosuchus, and Vectisuchus. Also, a Furthermore, the earliest potential dyrosaurids are phylogenetic definition of Pholidosauridae was Cenomanian in age (Buffetaut & Lauverjat, 1978; recently proposed by Fortier, Perea & Schultz (2011: Buffetaut, Bussert & Brinkmann, 1990). Therefore, S259) as: ‘a stem-based group name including investigating specimens from the Barremian– Pholidosaurus schaumburgensis (Meyer, 1841) and all Turonian stages will be key to elucidating the early taxa closer to it than to D. phosphaticus (Thomas, evolution of Tethysuchia. 1893) or Pelagosaurus typus Bronn, 1841′. No explicit Here we describe a long-known, but previously phylogenetic definition has been proposed for unstudied, tethysuchian crocodyliform. This speci- Dyrosauridae or Elosuchidae. men, the anterior-most part of a right dentary Phylogenetic analyses consistently find (NHMUK PV OR36173), is most probably from the Dyrosauridae to be holophyletic (e.g. Wu et al., 2001; Upper Greensand Formation of England (upper Jouve, 2005; Jouve et al., 2005a, 2006a, 2008; Albian, Lower Cretaceous). Although this specimen Barbosa et al., 2008; Young & Andrade, 2009; was discovered over 150 years ago, it has only been Hastings et al., 2010, 2011, in press; Andrade et al., briefly mentioned once in the literature. Furthermore, 2011; Fortier et al., 2011). The holophyly of it is of importance as a result of its unusual morphol- Pholidosauridae, however, is not always recovered. ogy and geological age. The presence of a marine Pholidosauridae has either been found to be a tethysuchian in the late Lower Cretaceous of the UK paraphyletic grade of taxa closely related to would indicate that tethysuchians moved into the Dyrosauridae (Wu et al., 2001; Jouve et al., 2005a, marine realm earlier than previously realized. 2008; Barbosa et al., 2008; Young & Andrade, 2009; Hastings et al., 2010, 2011, in press; Andrade et al., 2011), holophyletic (Fortier et al., 2011; and in one of ABBREVIATIONS the analyses of the Jouve et al., 2006a data set in INSTITUTIONAL Hastings et al., in press), or holophyletic with MIWG, the Museum of Isle of Wight Geology (now Elosuchus being outside the clade comprising IWCMS – the Isle of Wight County Museum Service, Dyrosauridae and Pholidosauridae (Jouve et al., incorporating Dinosaur Isle museum and visitor 2006a; and in one of the analyses of the Jouve et al., attraction); MNHN, Muséum national d’histoire 2006a data set in Hastings et al., in press). Martin & naturelle, Paris, France; NHMUK, Natural History Buffetaut (2012) and Martin et al. (2014b) also found Museum, London, UK. Pholidosauridae to be holophyletic, but as no dyrosaurids were included in those analyses they never tested whether pholidosaurids constitute a ANATOMICAL natural group. When Pholidosauridae is found to be D1, first dentary alveolus; D2, second dentary alveo- paraphyletic, the sister taxon of Dyrosauridae varies lus; D3, third dentary alveolus; D4, fourth dentary between Terminonaris (Wu et al., 2001; Jouve et al., alveolus; for, foramen; rug, rugose patch; sym, 2005a, 2008; Barbosa et al., 2008; Hastings et al., in symphysis. press), Oceanosuchus (Young & Andrade, 2009), and Elosuchus (Hastings et al., 2010, 2011), although HISTORICAL INFORMATION Oceanosuchus was only included in the analysis of Young & Andrade (2009). As such, the internal evo- The anterior right dentary (NHMUK PV OR36173) lutionary relationships of Tethysuchia are in flux. was purchased by the British Museum (Natural © 2014 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 113, 854–871 856 M. T. YOUNG ET AL. History) in October 1861 from a Mr Simmons. In the tion, and not from one of the Lower Greensand Group NHMUK specimen register, NHMUK PV OR36173 is formations exposed at Shanklin, is important (see listed as an ‘anterior portion of left upper jaw with Fig. 1). In order to determine this, one of the authors four teeth sockets, of a crocodilian reptile. Greensand? (T.P.) examined the fossils in the MIWG (IWCMS) and Shanklin, I. of Wight’. The only mention of the speci- the rocks at Shanklin. Descriptions of the deposits of men we can find in the literature is by Lydekker the Lower Greensand and Selborne Groups on the (1889: 179), who identified NHMUK PV OR36173 as Isle of Wight have been given by White (1921), Wach the pliosaurid, Polyptychodon interruptus, and states & Ruffell (1991), Insole, Daley & Gale (1998), and that it is: ‘apparently the extremity of the left Hopson, Wilkinson & Woods (2008). premaxilla’. Why he referred NHMUK
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE V
    GSA GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE v. 4.0 CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST HIST. ANOM. (Ma) ANOM. CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 66.0 541 CALABRIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE* 1.8 31 C31 MAASTRICHTIAN 252 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 Lopin- 254 32 C32 72.1 635 2A C2A PIACENZIAN WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 3.6 gian 33 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN CAPITANIAN NEOPRO- 5 C3 CAMPANIAN Guada- 265 750 CRYOGENIAN 5.3 80 C33 WORDIAN TEROZOIC 3A MESSINIAN LATE lupian 269 C3A 83.6 ROADIAN 272 850 7.2 SANTONIAN 4 KUNGURIAN C4 86.3 279 TONIAN CONIACIAN 280 4A Cisura- C4A TORTONIAN 90 89.8 1000 1000 PERMIAN ARTINSKIAN 10 5 TURONIAN lian C5 93.9 290 SAKMARIAN STENIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 296 SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 ASSELIAN 299 5A 100 100 300 GZHELIAN 1200 C5A 13.8 LATE 304 KASIMOVIAN 307 1250 MESOPRO- 15 LANGHIAN ECTASIAN 5B C5B ALBIAN MIDDLE MOSCOVIAN 16.0 TEROZOIC 5C C5C 110 VANIAN 315 PENNSYL- 1400 EARLY 5D C5D MIOCENE 113 320 BASHKIRIAN 323 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 1500 CALYMMIAN 6 C6 APTIAN LATE 20 120 331 6A C6A 20.4 EARLY 1600 M0r 126 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 MIDDLE VISEAN MISSIS- M3 BARREMIAN SIPPIAN STATHERIAN C6C 23.0 6C 130 M5 CRETACEOUS 131 347 1750 HAUTERIVIAN 7 C7 CARBONIFEROUS EARLY TOURNAISIAN 1800 M10 134 25 7A C7A 359 8 C8 CHATTIAN VALANGINIAN M12 360 140 M14 139 FAMENNIAN OROSIRIAN 9 C9 M16 28.1 M18 BERRIASIAN 2000 PROTEROZOIC 10 C10 LATE
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2015–1087
    Chronostratigraphic Cross Section of Cretaceous Formations in Western Montana, Western Wyoming, Eastern Utah, Northeastern Arizona, and Northwestern New Mexico, U.S.A. Pamphlet to accompany Open-File Report 2015–1087 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Chronostratigraphic Cross Section of Cretaceous Formations in Western Montana, Western Wyoming, Eastern Utah, Northeastern Arizona, and Northwestern New Mexico, U.S.A. By E.A. Merewether and K.C. McKinney Pamphlet to accompany Open-File Report 2015–1087 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Merewether, E.A., and McKinney, K.C., 2015, Chronostratigraphic cross section of Cretaceous formations in western Montana, western Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, and northwestern New Mexico, U.S.A.: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015–1087, 10 p.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Geologic Time Scale Cenozoic Mesozoic Paleozoic Precambrian Magnetic Magnetic Bdy
    2009 GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST. HIST. ANOM. ANOM. (Ma) CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 65.5 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 542 CALABRIAN MAASTRICHTIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE 1.8 31 C31 251 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 70.6 254 2A PIACENZIAN 32 C32 L 630 C2A 3.6 WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN 33 CAMPANIAN CAPITANIAN 5 C3 5.3 266 750 NEOPRO- CRYOGENIAN 80 C33 M WORDIAN MESSINIAN LATE 268 TEROZOIC 3A C3A 83.5 ROADIAN 7.2 SANTONIAN 271 85.8 KUNGURIAN 850 4 276 C4 CONIACIAN 280 4A 89.3 ARTINSKIAN TONIAN C4A L TORTONIAN 90 284 TURONIAN PERMIAN 10 5 93.5 E 1000 1000 C5 SAKMARIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 297 99.6 ASSELIAN STENIAN SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 299.0 5A 100 300 GZELIAN C5A 13.8 M KASIMOVIAN 304 1200 PENNSYL- 306 1250 15 5B LANGHIAN ALBIAN MOSCOVIAN MESOPRO- C5B VANIAN 312 ECTASIAN 5C 16.0 110 BASHKIRIAN TEROZOIC C5C 112 5D C5D MIOCENE 320 318 1400 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 326 6 C6 APTIAN 20 120 1500 CALYMMIAN E 20.4 6A C6A EARLY MISSIS- M0r 125 VISEAN 1600 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 SIPPIAN M3 BARREMIAN C6C 23.0 345 6C CRETACEOUS 130 M5 130 STATHERIAN CARBONIFEROUS TOURNAISIAN 7 C7 HAUTERIVIAN 1750 25 7A M10 C7A 136 359 8 C8 L CHATTIAN M12 VALANGINIAN 360 L 1800 140 M14 140 9 C9 M16 FAMENNIAN BERRIASIAN M18 PROTEROZOIC OROSIRIAN 10 C10 28.4 145.5 M20 2000 30 11 C11 TITHONIAN 374 PALEOPRO- 150 M22 2050 12 E RUPELIAN
    [Show full text]
  • Episodic Tectonism and Depositional History of the Mid- Cretaceous (Aptian-Turonian) Succession of Sverdrup Basin, Canadian Arctic Archipelago
    Episodic Tectonism and Depositional History of the Mid- Cretaceous (Aptian-Turonian) Succession of Sverdrup Basin, Canadian Arctic Archipelago Ashton Embry , Geological Survey of Canada, Calgary, [email protected] The mid-Cretaceous (Aptian-Turonian) succession of Sverdrup Basin, Canadian Arctic Archipelago, is up to 1.8 km thick and comprises the upper portion of the Isachsen Formation (sandstone-dominant), the entire Christopher (shale/siltstone-dominant), Hassel (sandstone-dominant), Bastion Ridge (shale/siltstone-dominant) and Strand Fiord (volcanic-dominant) formations and the basal portion of the Kanguk Formation (shale/siltstone-dominant). The strata contain three, large magnitude sequence boundaries of mid-Aptian (2nd order), near base Cenomanian (1st order) and late Cenomanian (2nd order) age The sequence boundaries divide the succession into two second order sequences of mid- Aptian/Albian, and Cenomanian age with Turonian strata forming the basal portion of an overlying Turonian-Maestrichtian second order sequence. The three sequence boundaries were generated by tectonics and significant depositional and tectonic changes occurred across each boundary. From Hauterivian to mid-Aptian the Sverdrup Basin was dominated by coarse-grained fluvial deposits derived from cratonic areas to the east and south. Substantial uplift occurred in mid-Aptian and was followed by high rates of subsidence. A major transgression pushed the shoreline beyond the basin margins. From late Aptian through early Albian, the basin was occupied by a marine shelf which received mainly mud and silt with shelf sandstone restricted to the basin margins. Marine shelf sandstones of storm origin prograded into the basin in mid Albian but renewed subsidence soon resulted in transgression and a return of widespread marine mud and silt deposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Cretaceous (Albian) Ammonites from the Chitina Valley and Talkeetna Mountains, Alaska
    Early Cretaceous (Albian) Ammonites From the Chitina Valley and Talkeetna Mountains, Alaska GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 354-D Early Cretaceous (Albian) Ammonites From the Chitina Valley and Talkeetna Mountains, Alaska By RALPH W. IMLAY SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 354-D The Early Cretaceous (Albian) ammonites in southern Alaska have strong affinities with those in California and Oregon but are in part of Boreal and Eurasian origin UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1960 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. - Price SO cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Ammonite faunules and correlations Continued Abstract..________________________________________ 87 Bretrericeras breweri and B. cf. B. hulenense faunule__ 91 Introduction _______________________________________ 87 Frebnhliceros singulare faunule____________________ 92 Biologic analysis____________________________________ 87 Other Albian faunules.__________________________ 93 Stratigraphic summary ______________________________ 88 Comparisons with other faunas_______________________ 93 Talkeetna Mountains ___________________________ 88 Geographic distribution._____________________________ 93 Chitina Valley__________________________________ 88 Summary of results _________________________________ 93 Ammonite faunules and correlations.__________________
    [Show full text]
  • Warm Middle Jurassic–Early Cretaceous High-Latitude Sea-Surface Temperatures from the Southern Ocean
    Clim. Past, 8, 215–226, 2012 www.clim-past.net/8/215/2012/ Climate doi:10.5194/cp-8-215-2012 of the Past © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Warm Middle Jurassic–Early Cretaceous high-latitude sea-surface temperatures from the Southern Ocean H. C. Jenkyns1, L. Schouten-Huibers2, S. Schouten2, and J. S. Sinninghe Damste´2 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3AN, UK 2NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Department of Marine Organic Biogeochemistry, P.O. Box 59, 1790 Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands Correspondence to: H. C. Jenkyns ([email protected]) Received: 17 March 2011 – Published in Clim. Past Discuss.: 20 April 2011 Revised: 6 December 2011 – Accepted: 14 December 2011 – Published: 2 February 2012 Abstract. Although a division of the Phanerozoic climatic 1 Introduction modes of the Earth into “greenhouse” and “icehouse” phases is widely accepted, whether or not polar ice developed dur- In order to understand Jurassic and Cretaceous climate, the ing the relatively warm Jurassic and Cretaceous Periods is reconstruction of sea-surface temperatures at high latitudes, still under debate. In particular, there is a range of iso- and their variation over different time scales, is of paramount topic and biotic evidence that favours the concept of discrete importance. A basic division of Phanerozoic climatic modes “cold snaps”, marked particularly by migration of certain into “icehouse” and “greenhouse” periods is now common- biota towards lower latitudes. Extension of the use of the place (Fischer, 1982). However, a number of authors have in- palaeotemperature proxy TEX86 back to the Middle Juras- voked transient icecaps as controls behind eustatic sea-level sic indicates that relatively warm sea-surface conditions (26– change during the Mesozoic greenhouse period (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART International Commission on Stratigraphy V 2020/03
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2020/03 numerical numerical numerical numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age GSSP GSSP GSSP GSSP EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) Eonothem / EonErathem / Era System / Period GSSA age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ±0.4 541.0 ±1.0 U/L Meghalayan 0.0042 Holocene M Northgrippian 0.0082 Tithonian Ediacaran L/E Greenlandian 0.0117 152.1 ±0.9 ~ 635 U/L Upper Famennian Neo- 0.129 Upper Kimmeridgian Cryogenian M Chibanian 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic ~ 720 0.774 372.2 ±1.6 Pleistocene Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 L/E Callovian Quaternary 166.1 ±1.2 Gelasian 2.58 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian Middle proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 Calymmian 7.246 Toarcian Devonian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.63 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Proterozoic Neogene Sinemurian Langhian 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Burdigalian Hettangian proterozoic 2050 20.44 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 Rhyacian Aquitanian Rhaetian Pridoli 23.03 ~ 208.5 423.0 ±2.3 2300 Ludfordian 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian Mesozoic Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Carl Lamanna
    Curriculum Vitae Matthew Carl Lamanna Assistant Curator Section of Vertebrate Paleontology Carnegie Museum of Natural History 4400 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-4080 (412) 578-2696 (Office) (412) 622-8837 (Fax) Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.carnegiemnh.org/vp/lamanna.html Education 2004 Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania, Department of Earth and Environmental Science. 1999 M.Sc., University of Pennsylvania, Department of Earth and Environmental Science. 1997 B.Sc., Hobart College, Departments of Geoscience and Biology, cum laude. Research Interests Mesozoic (principally Cretaceous) vertebrate faunas, paleoecology, and paleobiogeography; non-avian and avian dinosaur anatomy, systematics, and phylogeny. Academic and Professional Positions 2013–present Research Associate, Cleveland Museum of Natural History. 2012–present Principal Investigator and Project Director, Antarctic Peninsula Paleontology Project (AP3). 2005–present Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Geology and Planetary Science, University of Pittsburgh. 2004–present Assistant Curator, Section of Vertebrate Paleontology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History. 1999–present Paleontologist, Bahariya Dinosaur Project. 1997–present Research Associate, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University (Philadelphia). 1997–1998 Exhibit Design Consultant, Dinosaur Hall, Academy of Natural Sciences (Philadelphia). 1995 Research Assistant, University of New Orleans Lance Dinosaur Project. Field Experience 2016 Unnamed formation, Robertson Island,
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 26C-Nogrid
    Priscum Volume 26 | Issue 1 May 2021 The Newsletter of the Paleontological Society Inside this issue Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Matter in Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion matter in Paleontology Paleontology PS Development Developments Building an inclusive and equitable Where are we now? PaleoConnect Paleontological Society (see Section 12 of the Member Code of Conduct for definitions) is Since the Paleontological Society (PS) was Journal Corner essential to realizing our core purpose — founded in 1908, its membership has been advancing the field of paleontology (see Article dominated by white men from the United PS-AGI Summer 2020 Interns II of the Articles of Incorporation). However, like States. Racial and ethnic diversity in the PS many other scientific societies, ours has remain extremely low. More than 88% of Tribute to William Clemens, Jr. historically only fostered a sense of belonging respondents to PS membership surveys Educational Materials for a subset of individuals. conducted in 2013 and 2019 self-identified as White (Stigall, 2013; unpublished data, 2019). PS Ethics Committee Report Consider your outreach experiences. Imagine These surveys revealed that, unlike the visiting a series of first grade classrooms — proportion of women, which has increased in Research and Grant Awardees overwhelmingly, the children are fascinated by younger age cohorts (Stigall, 2013), racial and PS Annual meeting at GSA Connects dinosaur bones, scale trees, and trilobites — ethnic diversity varied little among age groups, 2021 regardless of their identities. Now, reflect on suggesting that substantial barriers to the your experiences in paleontological settings as inclusion of most racial and ethnic groups have Upcoming Opportunities an adult; do they include as much diversity as persisted across generations of PS members.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Non-Avian Dinosaurs from National Park Service Areas
    Lucas, S.G. and Sullivan, R.M., eds., 2018, Fossil Record 6. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 79. 703 AN INVENTORY OF NON-AVIAN DINOSAURS FROM NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AREAS JUSTIN S. TWEET1 and VINCENT L. SANTUCCI2 1National Park Service, 9149 79th Street S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 -email: [email protected]; 2National Park Service, Geologic Resources Division, 1849 “C” Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20240 -email: [email protected] Abstract—Dinosaurs have captured the interest and imagination of the general public, particularly children, around the world. Paleontological resource inventories within units of the National Park Service have revealed that body and trace fossils of non-avian dinosaurs have been documented in at least 21 National Park Service areas. In addition there are two historically associated occurrences, one equivocal occurrence, two NPS areas with dinosaur tracks in building stone, and one case where fossils have been found immediately outside of a monument’s boundaries. To date, body fossils of non- avian dinosaurs are documented at 14 NPS areas, may also be present at another, and are historically associated with two other parks. Dinosaur trace fossils have been documented at 17 NPS areas and are visible in building stone at two parks. Most records of NPS dinosaur fossils come from park units on the Colorado Plateau, where body fossils have been found in Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous rocks at many locations, and trace fossils are widely distributed in Upper Triassic and Jurassic rocks. Two NPS units are particularly noted for their dinosaur fossils: Dinosaur National Monument (Upper Triassic through Lower Cretaceous) and Big Bend National Park (Upper Cretaceous).
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic-Driven Climate Change and the Diversification of Angiosperms
    Tectonic-driven climate change and the diversification of angiosperms Anne-Claire Chaboureaua,1, Pierre Sepulchrea, Yannick Donnadieua, and Alain Francb aLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, Unité Mixte, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique–Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique– Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; and bUnité Mixte de Recherche Biodiversité, Gènes et Communautés, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 33612 Cestas, France Edited by Robert E. Dickinson, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved August 1, 2014 (received for review December 23, 2013) In 1879, Charles Darwin characterized the sudden and unexplained covers the large uncertainties of pCO2 estimates for these rise of angiosperms during the Cretaceous as an “abominable mys- geological periods. tery.” The diversification of this clade marked the beginning of To validate our paleoclimatic experiments, the geographical a rapid transition among Mesozoic ecosystems and floras formerly distribution of climate-sensitive sediments such as evaporites (dry dominated by ferns, conifers, and cycads. Although the role of en- or seasonally dry climate indicators) and coals (humid climate vironmental factors has been suggested [Coiffard C, Gómez B (2012) indicators) have been compared with our maps of simulated biomes Geol Acta 10(2):181–188], Cretaceous global climate change has for each time period (Fig. S1). Overall, for every time period, the barely been considered as a contributor to angiosperm radiation, spatial fit between coals and humid biomes is higher for 1,120-ppm and focus was put on biotic factors to explain this transition. Here and 2,240-ppm pCO2 scenarios than for 560 ppm (Table S1 and we use a fully coupled climate model driven by Mesozoic paleogeo- Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • International Chronostratigraphic Chart
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2018/07 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age GSSP GSSP GSSP GSSP EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon Erathem / Era System / Period GSSA age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 541.0 ±1.0 U/L Meghalayan 0.0042 Holocene M Northgrippian 0.0082 Tithonian Ediacaran L/E Greenlandian 152.1 ±0.9 ~ 635 Upper 0.0117 Famennian Neo- 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic ~ 720 Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian Callovian 1000 Quaternary Gelasian 166.1 ±1.2 2.58 Bathonian 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Middle 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Bajocian 170.3 ±1.4 Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Devonian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.63 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Proterozoic Neogene Sinemurian Langhian 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- 2050 Burdigalian Hettangian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 27.82 Gorstian
    [Show full text]