DOCSLIB.ORG

Thesis Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thesis Final With A Little Help From My Friends - did the UK break the law in order to help the US prosecute two members of the ISIS group known as the Beatles? To what extent has the UK violated its domestic and international legal obligations by not seeking assurances against the death penalty? Joel Mitchell ANR: 576792 SNR: 2000134 July 2019 Supervisor: Dr Jan Hendrik Valgaeren Bachelor Thesis for Tilburg University College Bachelor’s in Liberal Arts and Sciences: Major in Law !1 Abstract This thesis seeks to ascertain the extent to which the UK has violated its domestic and international legal obligations by not seeking assurances against the death penalty in the case of Kotey and El Sheikh. This has been achieved through legal analysis of the relevant legislation and case law, with analysis of the black letter law being utilised in conjunction with teleological interpretation. The history of the case provides a framework of facts and actions to which practical analysis of the relevant law can be applied. State responsibility is established before consideration of the actions of the UK and the extent to which they contravened any obligations. The juxtaposition between the legal obligations and the political complexities of the case are then considered. This thesis finds that the UK violated both its domestic and international legal obligations by not seeking assurances in the case of Kotey and El Sheikh. !2 Abstract 2 1 Introduction 4 2 Methodology 5 3 History of the case 7 3.1 Pre-capture and detention 7 3.2 Post-capture and detention 8 3.2 Initiation of proceedings 14 4 ECHR - analysis of the relevant articles 15 4.1 Interpretation of the Convention 16 4.2 Article 2 - The Right to Life 17 4.3 Article 3 - Prohibition of Torture 18 5 Jurisdiction and State Responsibility 19 6 Did the UK breach its respective domestic and international obligations? 28 6.1 Domestic obligations 28 6.2 International Obligations 37 6 Political Complexities and Solutions 44 6.1 Original decision to accede to MLA request without assurances 46 6.2 Decision as to whether assurances should be sought ex post facto 51 7 Conclusion 54 !3 1 Introduction The ‘special relationship’ between the UK and the US has been placed under increasing scrutiny in recent years, as revelations of an extensive post-9/11 US torture program1 have led to further light being shed on the complicity of the UK in such activities.2 This meant that when the Daily Telegraph published a leaked copy of Home Secretary Sajid Javid’s letter addressed to the US Attorney General Jeff Sessions (AG),3 there were immediately questions raised about its contents. The letter revealed that the UK would be acceding to a request for Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) in a case concerning the prosecution of two ISIS fighters - Alexanda Kotey and Shafee El Sheikh - and that they would be doing so without seeking assurances against the death penalty.4 Such assurances would mean that the information provided by the UK could not be used in any case where the men being prosecuted may face the death penalty.5 It is felt by many that by failing to seek any assurances, the Home Secretary rendered the UK complicit in the use of the death penalty, thereby undermining the long-term position of the UK as a staunch abolitionist of the death penalty.6 1 European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, ‘The US Torture Program - Approved at the Highest Levels’ (ecchr.eu, May 2019) <https://www.ecchr.eu/fileadmin/Sondernewsletter_Dossiers/ Dossier_US_Accountability_May2019_.pdf> accessed 1 July 2019. 2 Ian Cobain and Ewan MacAskill, ‘True scale of UK role in torture and rendition after 9/11 revealed’ The Guardian (28 June 2018) <https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jun/28/uk-role-torture-kidnap-terror- suspects-after-911-revealed> 1 July 2019. 3 R. (on the application of Maha El Gizouli) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWHC 60 (Admin), [2019] WL 111 [35]. 4 ibid [33]. 5 ibid [7]. 6 Gaby Hinsliff, ‘The death penalty is an abomination – Sajid Javid must not condone it’ The Guardian (24 July 2018) <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/24/death-penalty-sajid-javid-isis-beatles> accessed 1 July 2019. !4 It must be emphasised that this thesis is not merely an abstract academic endeavour. The purpose of the thesis is to address the issues raised by an ongoing case, providing a comprehensive analysis of the legality of the decision by the Home Secretary, the practical solutions that could be implemented and consequently, the conclusions reached within it are designed to have a real-world application. This thesis will look at whether failing to seek assurances placed any responsibility at the feet of the UK for the fate of the two men and if so, whether it would be in contravention of not only the domestic law of the UK, but of the European Convention on Human Rights7 (herein referred to as the ECHR or the Convention), to which the UK is a State Party. Further to this, the political nature of the decision of the Home Secretary will be discussed, along with the solutions which could have been implemented instead, before looking at the options which remain open to the UK. 2 Methodology The purpose of this thesis is to reach a conclusion which could have real-world application, which in turn requires the undertaking of applied research. In order to assess whether the UK broke the law in acceding to the MLA request and to what extent it violated its domestic and international legal obligations by not seeking assurances against the death penalty, it was necessary to look primarily at the relevant black letter law. In order to determine which legislation and caselaw would be relevant, those cited and considered by the High Court in the case of Kotey and El Sheikh, were used as the starting point. In order to narrow down which legislation and caselaw would be most useful, those 7 Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights, as amended) (ECHR). !5 cited and considered by the Court were cross-referenced with various legal articles and blogs which focused on the case of Kotey and El Sheikh. These articles and blogs were discovered by searching for the names of the two men on Google in order to return journal articles and opinion pieces, as well as by searching for their names on legal databases such Westlaw Next. Once a core of relevant legislation and caselaw had been established, it was possible to use the citations within these works to discover further relevant information. In order to find further relevant information, combinations of key terms and concepts were entered into journal databases such as Google Scholar and WorldCat Discovery. However, there were limitations to the ability to conduct research which allowed for a decisive conclusion on the legality of the UK’s actions. This was due to the complexity of the case at hand, which deals with an unprecedented combination of facts and issues. Since the case has not reached the European Court of Human Rights (herein referred to as the ECtHR or the Court), it is not possible to determine conclusively the legality of the actions of the UK, as this can only be decided by the Court itselfs. Therefore, using the travaux préparatoires of the Court alongside extensive analysis of the Court’s caselaw, the conclusions arrived at must be hypothetical, in lieu of a ruling by the Court itself. Despite the necessity that the conclusions arrived at be hypothetical in nature, conducting research through extensive analysis of black letter law, supplemented by journal articles, provides strong justification for the conclusions arrived at throughout this thesis. !6 3 History of the case 3.1 Pre-capture and detention In June of 2015, the US government made a request of the UK government pursuant to the Treaty of Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters, a bi-lateral agreement signed between the two nations in 1994.8 The request was made in relation to a US investigation into the notorious so-called Islamic State (ISIL) cell referred to as ‘The Beatles’, known as such due to their distinctive British accents, who were suspected of having participated in the executions of US citizens. Mr Graeme Biggar, the Director of National Security in the Home Office, later described the action of the group in a witness statement: ‘This group of terrorists is associated with some of the most barbaric crimes committed during the conflict in Syria. This includes its suspected involvement in the beheading of 27 individuals, including the murders of US citizens James Foley, Steven Sotloff and Peter Kassig, and British citizens David Haines and Alan Henning. All but one of these beheadings were filmed and posted on the internet. The nature of the deaths suffered by these men (and the ongoing kidnap of others) has brought immense anguish to their families.’9 In response to the request from the US government, in October 2015 the United Kingdom Central Authority (UKCA) sought an assurance that ‘the death penalty will not 8 El Gizouli v SSHD (n 3) [5]. 9 ibid [6]. !7 be sought or imposed, or if imposed, will not be carried out against anyone found guilty of any criminal offence arising from this investigation’.10 In seeking such an assurance, the UKCA followed the Mutual Legal Assistance guidelines11 as informed by the Overseas Security and Justice Assistance Human Rights (OSJA) guidance.12 Instead of such an assurance, in March 2016 the US Department of Justice provided a ‘Direct Use’ guarantee which would not allow the information received as part of the MLA to be used in any trial where the death penalty is sought.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • I'm Glad the Jihadi 'Beatles' Will Face Trial
    Date 03 October 2020 Page 22 I’m glad the jihadi ‘Beatles’ will face trial Diane Foley, mother of murdered journalist, James, Charlotte Lytton tells that justice can wait no longer he image is seared who have agreed to waive the death with them, if given the chance. “I into public memory: penalty. “We must dare to bring them certainly would be open to talking to a man in an orange to trial,” says Diane Foley, James’s them. I don’t know if they’d have any T-shirt kneeling in the mother. Her hope is not just “to get interest though.” T desert, head shaved, a to the truth of the matter” but that, A new BBC documentary series, In knife to his neck. The if proven guilty, Kotey and Elsheikh the Face of Terror, follows the attempts beheading of James Foley, the first “recognise what they’ve done, and of the Foleys and other families of Islamic State hostage to meet this make amends for what they’ve hostages to ensure the atrocities grim end in August 2014, marked the inflicted on so many innocent people… inflicted on their loved ones aren’t group’s introduction to the Western there must be some accountability. allowed to happen again. world – a summer of bloodshed that Justice needs to be served.” “I often felt no one had Jim’s name would trigger a series of attacks Londoners Kotey, 36, and on their desk as a priority,” John, carried out in their name in cities Elsheikh, 32 – nicknamed Ringo and his father, says in the first of three from London to Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Gw Extremism Tracker Terrorism in the United States
    GW EXTREMISM TRACKER TERRORISM IN THE UNITED STATES INDIVIDUALS HAVE BEEN CHARGED IN THE U.S. ON OFFENSES RELATED 217 to the Islamic State (also known as IS, ISIS, and ISIL) since March 2014, when the first arrests occurred. Of those: Their activities were located in 30 states and the District of Columbia the average age of are male 90% 28 those charged. have pleaded or * the average length 157 were found guilty 13.2 of sentence in years. *Uses 470 months for life sentences per the practice of the U.S. Sentencing Commission were accused of attempting 39% to travel or successfully traveled abroad. were accused of being 31% involved in plots to carry out attacks on U.S. soil. were charged in an operation MALE 58% involving an informant and/or an undercover agent. FEMALE indicates law enforcement operation Acknowledgement Disclaimer This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as under Grant Award Number 20STTPC00001‐01 necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Apprehensions & Charges for Other conspirators were involved in the IS “hostage-taking scheme,” which resulted in the kidnapping and subsequent death of Jihadist Groups James Foley, Kayla Mueller, Steven Sotloff, Peter Kassig, as well as British and Japanese nationals. The pair, who also face material support charges, were captured in January of 2018 by OCT 21 VA the Syrian Democratic Forces and transferred to American custody in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Vulnerability to Radicalisation Among Students Emma Webb
    Spotting the Signs: Identifying Vulnerability to Radicalisation Among Students Emma Webb Published in 2017 by The Henry Jackson Society The Henry Jackson Society Millbank Tower 21-24 Millbank London SW1P 4QP Registered charity no. 1140489 Tel: +44 (0)20 7340 4520 www.henryjacksonsociety.org (C) The Henry Jackson Society 2017 All rights reserved The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and are not necessarily indicative of those of The Henry Jackson Society or its Trustees Title: "Spotting the Signs: Identifying Vulnerability to Radicalisation among Students" By: Emma Webb ISBN: 978-1-909035-30-0 £10 where sold All rights reserved Photo Credits Cover Photo: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Flag_-_Union_Flag.jpg Spotting The Signs: Identifying Vulnerability To Radicalisation Among Students Emma Webb www.henryjacksonsociety.org 2 Table of Contents Foreword……………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Executive Summary…………………………………………….…………………………….… 7 Introduction.…………………………………………………………………………………...…. 9 Methodology…………………………………………………………………………………….… 10 Profiles…………………………………………………………………………………………….… 13 Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………………... 62 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….… 62 2. Findings…………………………………………………………………………………………. 68 3. The Importance of Socialisation……………………………………………………..... 70 4. The Online Facilitation of Real-world Relationships………………………….… 79 5. The Role of Behavioural Changes in Identifying Vulnerability……………… 81 6. Policy Recommendations……………………………………………………………….… 87 7. Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………… 91 3 SPOTTING THE SIGNS: IDENTIFYING VULNERABILITY TO RADICALISATION AMONG STUDENTS Foreword I was in a hurry, rushing to catch the bus that’s perpetually crowded and noisy. As I caught my breath, I looked out of the window and could not help but feel stunned and perplexed as the events from the past weeks replayed in my head. Then my phone rang. It was my son, Rasheed. As he spoke, I detected a rasp in his voice.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Monitor
    THE JAMESTOWN FOUNDATION APRIL 6, 2018 VOLUME XVI, ISSUE 7 p.1 p.3 p.6 p.8 Alexander Sehmer James Brandon Mukhtar A Khan Andrew McGregor BRIEFS The Threat From Islamic State a Deadly Salafists, Mercenaries British Jihadists After Force in Kabul and Body Snatchers: the Caliphate’s Fall The War for Libya’s South NIGERIA: TALKING TO BOKO HARAM Although there was speculation about a similar move under the administration of former President Goodluck Alexander Sehmer Jonathan in 2012, the ceasefire talks are a new devel- opment. It came at a time when the government was A presidential offer of amnesty for Boko Haram fighters riding high on the release of the Dapchi schoolgirls, who who lay down their weapons has had little apparent ef- were abducted by Boko Haram in February (Daily Trust, fect on militant activity in northeastern Nigeria, with March 25). more than a dozen people killed in a recent clash be- tween Islamist fighters and the country’s security forces. President Muhammadu Buhari used a meeting with the newly freed girls to announce his administration would Boko Haram fighters using suicide bombers and mortars respond favorably to “repentant” Boko Haram fighters attacked two villages and a military base near Maid- (Premium Times, March 23). That offer has not, howev- uguri, in Borno State, on April 2, killing at least 15 peo- er, received universal acclaim. Groups such as the Christ- ple (Sahara Reporters, April 2). Though the attack was ian Association of Nigeria have criticized the move as an the largest since the government made the surprise an- admission of weakness on the part of the government nouncement that it had been holding ceasefire talks (Punch, March 24; Twitter, March 23).
    [Show full text]
  • 9Th October 2020
    9th October 2020 o19 HIGHLIGHTS • Worldwide cases of COVID-19 are now at 36,761,333 with deaths numbering 1,066,956 according to Worldometer. 27,673,862 people have so far recovered from the virus. • Official figures show that three times as many people have died from COVID-19 than from flu and pneumonia in England and Wales this year. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) also revealed that COVID-19 has proven deadlier than any flu and pneumonia season dating back to 1959 when ONS records began. • United States President Donald Trump returned to the White House on Wednesday 7th October, less than a week after testing positive for coronavirus. The President’s doctors have cleared him to resume public events from Saturday 10th October, with Mr Trump himself saying he feels “better than [he] did 20 years ago.” However, there are fears that the President is downplaying the severity of his illness as doctors revealed he was treated with a strong steroid and an experimental “antibody cocktail” which would not normally be used for milder cases. • Almost 16,000 positive COVID-19 test results went unreported in the UK last weekend due to a technical glitch. The error meant that those who tested positive were notified of their result, but people they had been in contact with were unable to be traced. The error has since been rectified and the missing records added to the Public Health England daily totals for the 3rd and 4th October and tracers are working through the contacts of the positive cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Digest of Other White House
    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Digest of Other White House Announcements December 31, 2019 The following list includes the President's public schedule and other items of general interest announced by the Office of the Press Secretary and not included elsewhere in this Compilation. January 1 In the afternoon, the President posted to his personal Twitter feed his congratulations to President Jair Messias Bolsonaro of Brazil on his Inauguration. In the evening, the President had a telephone conversation with Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel. During the day, the President had a telephone conversation with President Abdelfattah Said Elsisi of Egypt to reaffirm Egypt-U.S. relations, including the shared goals of countering terrorism and increasing regional stability, and discuss the upcoming inauguration of the Cathedral of the Nativity and the al-Fatah al-Aleem Mosque in the New Administrative Capital and other efforts to advance religious freedom in Egypt. January 2 In the afternoon, in the Situation Room, the President and Vice President Michael R. Pence participated in a briefing on border security by Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen for congressional leadership. January 3 In the afternoon, the President had separate telephone conversations with Anamika "Mika" Chand-Singh, wife of Newman, CA, police officer Cpl. Ronil Singh, who was killed during a traffic stop on December 26, 2018, Newman Police Chief Randy Richardson, and Stanislaus County, CA, Sheriff Adam Christianson to praise Officer Singh's service to his fellow citizens, offer his condolences, and commend law enforcement's rapid investigation, response, and apprehension of the suspect.
    [Show full text]
  • JIHADIST TERRORISM 17 YEARS AFTER 9/11 a Threat Assessment
    PETER BERGEN AND DAVID STERMAN JIHADIST TERRORISM 17 YEARS AFTER 9/11 A Threat Assessment SEPTEMBER 2018 About the Author(s) Acknowledgments Peter Bergen is a journalist, documentary producer, The authors would like to thank Wesley Je�eries, John vice president for global studies & fellows at New Luebke, Melissa Salyk-Virk, Daiva Scovil, and Tala Al- America, CNN national security analyst, professor of Shabboot for their research support on this paper. The practice at Arizona State University where he co- authors also thank Alyssa Sims and Albert Ford, who directs the Center on the Future of War, and the co-authored the previous year’s assessment which author or editor of seven books, three of which were forms the basis of much of this report. New York Times bestsellers and four of which were named among the best non-�ction books of the year by The Washington Post. David Sterman is a senior policy analyst at New America and holds a master's degree from Georgetown’s Center for Security Studies. About New America We are dedicated to renewing America by continuing the quest to realize our nation’s highest ideals, honestly confronting the challenges caused by rapid technological and social change, and seizing the opportunities those changes create. About International Security The International Security program aims to provide evidence-based analysis of some of the thorniest questions facing American policymakers and the public. We are focused on South Asia and the Middle East, extremist groups such as ISIS, al Qaeda and allied groups, the proliferation of drones, homeland security, and the activities of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Inspector General for Operation Inherent Resolve
    OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS JULY 1, 2020–SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 ABOUT THIS REPORT A 2013 amendment to the Inspector General Act established the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) framework for oversight of overseas contingency operations and requires that the Lead IG submit quarterly reports to Congress on each active operation. The Chair of the Council of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency designated the DoD Inspector General (IG) as the Lead IG for Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR). The DoS IG is the Associate IG for the operation. The USAID IG participates in oversight of the operation. The Offices of Inspector General (OIG) of the DoD, the DoS, and USAID are referred to in this report as the Lead IG agencies. Other partner agencies also contribute to oversight of OIR. The Lead IG agencies collectively carry out the Lead IG statutory responsibilities to: • Develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight of the operation. • Ensure independent and effective oversight of programs and operations of the U.S. Government in support of the operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, investigations, and evaluations. • Report quarterly to Congress and the public on the operation and on activities of the Lead IG agencies. METHODOLOGY To produce this quarterly report, the Lead IG agencies submit requests for information to the DoD, the DoS, USAID, and other Federal agencies about OIR and related programs. The Lead IG agencies also gather data and information from other sources, including official documents, congressional testimony, policy research organizations, press conferences, think tanks, and media reports.
    [Show full text]
  • ISIS Type of Organization
    ISIS Name: ISIS Type of Organization: Insurgent territory-controlling religious terrorist violent Ideologies and Affiliations: Islamist jihadist pan-Islamist Salafist takfiri Place of Origin: Iraq Year of Origin: Al-Qaeda in Iraq: 2004; ISIS: 2013 Founder(s): Al-Qaeda in Iraq: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi; ISIS: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Places of Operation: ISIS has declared wilayas (provinces) in Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Turkey, Central Africa, Mali, Niger, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mozambique, and the North Caucasus. Beyond this, the terror group has waged attacks in Lebanon, France, Belgium, Bangladesh, Morocco, Indonesia, Malaysia, Tunisia, and Kuwait. Overview Also known as: ISIS Al-Qa’ida Group of Jihad in Iraq1 Organization of al-Jihad’s Base in the Land of the Two Rivers40 Al-Qa’ida Group of Jihad in the Land of the Two Rivers2 Organization Base of Jihad/Country of the Two Rivers41 Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI)3 Organization of al-Jihad’s Base of Operations in Iraq42 Al-Qa’ida in Iraq – Zarqawi4 Organization of al-Jihad’s Base of Operations in the Land of the Al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia (AQM)5 Two Rivers43 Al-Qa’ida in the Land of the Two Rivers6 Organization of Jihad’s Base in the Country of the Two Rivers Al-Qa’ida of Jihad Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers7 44 Al-Qa’ida of the Jihad in the Land of the Two Rivers8 Qaida of the Jihad in the Land of the Two Rivers45 Al-Qaeda Separatists in Iraq and Syria (QSIS)9 Southern Province46 Al-Tawhid10 Tanzeem Qa'idat al
    [Show full text]
  • Citizenship Deprivation As a Counterterrorism Measure in Europe; Possible Follow-Up Scenarios, Human Rights Infringements and the Effect on Counterterrorism
    European Journal of Migration and Law 22 (2020) 338–365 brill.com/emil Citizenship Deprivation as a Counterterrorism Measure in Europe; Possible Follow-Up Scenarios, Human Rights Infringements and the Effect on Counterterrorism Maarten P. Bolhuis and Joris van Wijk Assistant Professor respectively Associate Professor, Center for International Criminal Justice, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract The departure of substantial numbers of ‘foreign fighters’ and the occurrence of ter- rorist attacks on European soil have prompted renewed interest in citizenship depriva- tion as a policy measure. This article aims to contribute to the debate on its utility as a counterterrorism measure by examining recent developments in citizenship depriva- tion legislation and its use in Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK; discussing the wide array of possible scenarios that may follow after an individual is deprived of citizenship; and analysing to what extent the various outcomes are in- strumental in countering terrorism. It concludes that most of the outcomes are prob- lematic from a human rights perspective, or counterproductive in the fight against terrorism as they may cause further marginalisation and radicalisation and can play into the hands of terrorist groups, may cause people to disappear from the radar, and may undermine crucial international cooperation. Keywords citizenship deprivation – foreign fighters – counterterrorism – deportation – statelessness – radicalisation – legal limbo © Maarten P. Bolhuis and Joris van Wijk, 2020 | doi:10.1163/15718166-12340079 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NCDownloaded 4.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Blocked from Making Alleged Extremists Stateless by Secret Court in Ruling That Will Set Precedent
    News > UK > Crime UK blocked from making alleged extremists stateless by secret court in ruling that will set precedent Judge allows appeal by two alleged Islamists after government tried to strip their British citizenship Click to follow Lizzie Dearden Home Affairs Correspondent | @lizziedearden | 15 hours ago Like The Independent Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD 2 The men had their citizenship revoked days before they were returned to the UK from Bangladesh and Turkey ( Getty/iStock ) The government’s attempt to strip two alleged Islamists of their British citizenship was unlawful, judges have ruled in a case that could hamper attempts to stop Isis fighters returning to the UK. The men, who are not accused of any association with Isis, were among more than 100 people to be stripped of British nationality last year as the government increased its use of the controversial power. Their successful appeal sets a new legal precedent and could spark a more cautious approach to citizenship deprivations by the government. Read more Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD UK ‘must not let standards It may also trigger a wave of appeals slip’ in face of terror, Ken Clarke warns by terror suspects facing what one lawyer called “a return to the medieval Rochdale grooming gang members could be deported penalties of banishment and exile”. to Pakistan The Special Immigration and Appeals Isis ‘Beatles’ accuse UK of Commission allowed an appeal by two breaking law by removing citizenship men – codenamed E3 and N3 – after closed hearings where their lawyers and government representatives battled over their status.
    [Show full text]
  • For Caliph and Country Exploring How British Jihadis Join a Global Movement
    For Caliph and Country Exploring how British jihadis join a global movement RACHEL BRYSON 1 2 Contents Executive Summary 5 Policy Recommendations 9 Findings British Jihadis in a Global Network 13 Trends Among British Jihadis 23 Appendix Methodology 34 Note Research for this report was conducted in November and December 2016 and then subsequently analysed. 3 4 1.0 Executive Summary This report explores what connects jihadis from across the UK and how they made their journey into jihadism. For more than 30 years, British jihadis have been fighting under the banner of an extreme Islamist ideology in conflicts from Algeria to the Philippines. For half of that time, the streets of the UK have been seen as a legitimate target, as witnessed most recently in both London and Manchester. Ideologues made their home in Britain, having been rejected from Muslim-majority countries because the ideas they expounded were considered dangerous. From the UK, they influenced many. In the last five years, the conflict in Syria alone has attracted over 800 British fighters.1 1 “Who are Britain’s Jihadists?”, BBC News, 10 October 2016. www. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-32026985. 55 Their ideology justifies the use of violent jihad to Our sample was diverse – from the very wealthy achieve its aims. Its proponents believe in imposing to the very poor; those raised in Muslim households to their interpretation of Islam on others as state law, with converts; ‘straight-laced,’ straight-A students, to drug no tolerance for alternatives. They believe in brutally dealers – but there were some significant trends that punishing apostates and subjugating women.
    [Show full text]