DOCSLIB.ORG

0) Us Manned Space-Flight Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

rP (D MODULAR SPACE STATION (MSS) I An Architectural Thesis Program (0 Submitted to the Faculty of Architecture, Texas Tech University DC in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Degree of < J 3 BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE D 0 August 1976 by Raymond R. Nikel and Fred D. Ballinger 7^^^y^7 K (r The writers wish to thank the staff of NASA, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, for their cooperation and guidance in the 01 preparation of this program. In particular, we extend special gratitude III to the following individuals: to Robert Gordon (Public Affairs Officer) IW^SA for coordinating our activities while visiting the Johnson Space Center; to Maynard Dalton (Habitability Systems Engineer) for personally accom­ \ panying us on private tours of the Johnson Space Center facilities and (0 spacecraft mockups, for providing use of the Skylab film library, and for procuring NASA technical manuals pertinent to our area of research; < to astronaut Dr. Joseph P. Kerwin (scientist-astronaut of the Skylab II J mission) and Col. William R. Pogue (astronaut of the Skylab IV mission) 3 for their candid remarks relative to their personal experiences aboard Q the Skylab missions; and for the contributions of Clark Covington (Sys­ 0 tems Design Engineer), James C. Jones (Preliminary Design Engineer), and John Poindexter (Educational Programs Officer). We would also like to thank Professor Nolan E. Barrick (Chairman of the Division of Architecture, Texas Tech University) for granting us permission to investigate this thesis problem. Space architecture is a relatively new field and offers enormous opportunities for architectural consideration. DEDICATIOIM k (T (0 This program is dedicated to our wives, Margaret and Brenda, without whose sacrifice this document as well as our educational experience would not have been possible; and to our sons, Raymond and Brian, in whose generation deeper space exploration and colonization will be realized. We encourage their pursuit of this final frontier. V 111 (T J) ^ PURPOSE OF PROGRAM (0 The purpose of this program is to determine the require­ 111 ments or needs for the design of a Modular Space Station (MSS). The space station's internal configuration and external config­ \ uration will be the focal points of design consideration. (0 Emphasis, however, will be focused directly on the habitability criteria surrounding crew living/working volumes. It should DC be noted that the designs of space station subsystems are the < responsibility of NASA contractors and as such are already J provided for. It is our intention, then, to concern ourselves 3 with the requirements for the habitability aspects of a space D station design. 0 V Men's conception of themselves and of each other has always depen­ ded on their notion of the Earth...to see the Earth as it truly is, small and blue and beautiful in that eternal silence where it floats, is to see ourselves as riders on the Earth together... (0 brothers who know now they are truly brothers. - Archibald MacLeish, during Apollo 8 flight, 1968. lU The first movements into space, which culminated in Apollo, cata­ lyzed our imagination. Skylab gave direction to our imagination. The Space Shuttle now gives license to our imagination. - Dr. Harrison Schmitt, Astronaut. t (0 The space effort is essentially a step in the evolution of man as a biological species and that the basic, usually unexpressed, long range objective of space exploration is the expansion of our DC species into yet another ecological niche, or series of niches, which happens to be estraterrestrial. - Dr. Ward J. Hess, Director < of the Space Sciences Center of the University of Missouri, Nov. 3, J 1965. 3 On attempting to reach the stars, Man may well be responding to a Q fundamental drive to explore and to adapt to a new environment. Space exploration may very well be the next and most logical step 0 in man's primeval urge to expand the ecological range of the human species. - Mitchell R. Sharpe, Author of the book. Living in Space, "The Astronaut and His Environment", 1969. I feel personally that the general goals of the space program are a natural continuation of the human adventure. It is unthinkable that our society, particularly Western society, can ignore this challenge. - Dr. Frederick Seitz, President, National Academy of Sciences, in Congressional testimony, 1963. ...any nation, to remain great, must lead in exploration of the k unknown and the discovery of new worlds. - Richard M. Nixon, 1968, fT IMOI^<^ 111 \ U) DC < J 3 D 0 k ^ ^ TAKLE OF COUfTKllTS Page 0 1, 0 ACKMOWLEDOMEISITS ii 2.0 DEDICAflOM iii 3.0 PRELUDE. iv 4.0 TABLE; OF CONTKIMTS vi 5. 0 LIST OF FIGURES xi 6.0 LIST OF TABLES xiii 7.0 PREFACE xiv < 8 . 0 INTRODOCTIOM l J 8 .1 Opening Remarks 1 3 8.2 Program Objectives 1 0 8.3 Client 1 Q 8 . 4 Project Feasibility 1 9.0 SITE AKAL-YSIS 3 9.1 Location 3 9. 2 Environment 3 9.2.1 Earth' s Atmosphere 3 9.2.2 Radiations 9 9.2.3 Meteoroids 9 IMDI^^ 1®-® mismim: 1®,1 fflisitsaacy <j»ff CliLemiit... ^ *«*..^..^^^.. 13 1®..!..! isiatiimnal 55sawis®rf QsMnmi-t-t.©© f<Q)C a,eirmBaTffi-!ti(c:s ((iSjaov)) ..^....**» 13 Spac® .MiniiBiaLiStaraitieaDi ((BSiSa)) ... 13 lffi-1-3 imsa ©bjetelti^is^es 13 1®.1.4 nasa ©rg-atnuLzaititaflBi . M 1®.1.5 FtQunjffliuag- attnd Btmtag-elt. .......... 15 1®-!-® Friogx-^ini Frissriities atEofffl Fiaumaiumg. ---...-..-....-...... IS l®-2 Itettiteia S-tates ISDaimmed Spa<ee F3Dogx«itis.. 21 1®-2.1 Im-ttEtodimctisMa 21 1®.2.2 Meromr^ Fnagrami 21 1®.2.3 (S^miTfil Frssgram......, ..... 21 1®.2.4 apoll© FW3)gr«im 22 1®.2.5 Skylab FEtoxgram 24 1®, 2- € a^)©ll©/S©3fTaz Pi?©^raM. 35 l®-3 FimltTaire nJndted States MajDnmed Frograms. 3® 1®.3.1 Space Shmttle 3® l®,3-2 Space ]Labs 4® 11-® SFACE sraflOM BEFIMKID 4S ^ 11.1 Introduction 48 11. 2 Space Lab Theme 48 (0 11.3 Operational Base Theme 48 11.3.1 Construction Base 49 Ul 11.3.2 Test Facility 49 11.3.3 Spacecraft Service Facility. 49 \ 11.3.4 Orbital Depot 49 (0 11.3.5 Cluster Support Base 49 12.0 HABITABILITY DEFINED 51 a < 13.0 MODULAR CONCEPT DEFINED 53 J 14.0 MODULAR SPACE STATION (MSS) 54 3 14.1 MSS Defined 54 D 14.2 Requirements Defined 54 0 14.3 MSS Internal Configuration Criteria. 55 14 . 3 .1 Program 55 14.3.2 Operations 55 14.3.3 Configuration 55 14.3.4 Subsystems 56 14.3.5 Safety 56 14.3.6 Reliability 61 V ^ 14.3.7 Maintainability 61 14.3.8 Habitability 62 (0 14.3.9 Facilities 64 14.4 MSS External Configuration Criteria. 67 Ul 14 , 4 .1 Program 67 14.4.2 Operations 67 \ 14.4.3 Flight Modes 67 14. 4. 4 Subsystems 68 14.4.5 Safety 68 (I < 14.5 Internal and External Configuration Criteria - Expanded Issue 68 J 14.5.1 Station Assembly 68 3 14.5.2 Structural Arrangement 68 Q 14.5.3 Windows 72 0 15,0 APPENDIX I LESSONS LEARNED FROM SKYLAB,,. 76 16,0 APPENDIX II ANTHROPOMETRIC REQUIREMENTS FOR ZERO-GRAVITY 91 17.0 FOOTNOTES 119 17.1 Text 119 17.2 Figures and Tables 120 18 . 0 ACRONYMS 122 ik 19.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY 123 19.1 Books 123 (0 19.2 Film Highlights (NASA Johnson Space Center Films ) 123 III 19.3 Magazine Articles-Brochures 124 19.4 Personal Interviews (NASA Johnson t Space Center) 125 0) 19.5 Skylab Experience Bulletins 126 19.6 Technical Manuals, Reports and DC Studies 127 < 20.0 CONCLUSION 128 Part I: Team Design External Configura­ J tion 128 3 Part II: Individual Design Station Module One 139 D Part III: Individual Design Station 0 Module Four 148 h^ (T ^ CO u111 i U) DC < J 3 D 0 V ^ LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page (0 9.1.0.1 Space Station Location 4 9.2.1.1 Temperature Range of the Atmosphere 6 Ul 9.2.1.2 Chemical Structure of the Atmosphere.,.. 6 u 9.2.1.3 The Earth's Atmosphere, Temperature and Pressure 7 t 9.2.1.4 The Protective Atmosphere 8 9.2.2.1 The Van Allen Radiation Belts 10 DC 9.2.2.2 The Earth's Radiation Belts 11 < J 9.2.2.3 The Earth's Magnetic Field 11 3 10.1.4.1 NASA Personnel and Facilities 16 Q 10.2.3.2 Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo Spacecraft.. 23 0 10.2.4.2 U.S. Manned Spaceflight 27 10.2.4.3 Orbital Workshop 30 10.2,4,1 Skylab 31 10.2.4.4 Skylab Mission Sequence 32 10.2.4.5 CSM Docking and Skylab 34 10.2.6.1 Apollo/Soyuz Space Crafts 36 10.2.6.2 Mission Profile ASTP 37 ^ 10.3.1.1 Profile of Shuttle Mission 41 h 10.3.1.2 Space Shuttle Vehicle 42 (0 10.3.2.1 Spacelab 43 10.3.2.2 Spacelab 44 Ul 10.3.2.3 Spacelab Program Contributors 46 14,3.4.1 Modular Space Station Subsystem 57 \ 14.3.5.1 Common Hatch 60 CO 14.5.1.1 Payload Retention System 69 14.5.1.2 Manipulator/Payload Attachment.... 6 9 a 14.5.1.3 Payload Deployment/Retrieval Mechanism. 70 J 14.5.1.4 Typical Module Berthing 70 3 14.5.1.5 Shuttle Manipulator Reach Envelope 71 Q 14.5.1.6 Berthing Port Arrangement 71 0 14.5,2,1 Station Module Structural Arrangement,.
Recommended publications
  • Bibliography

    Bibliography

    Annotated List of Works Cited Primary Sources Newspapers “Apollo 11 se Vraci na Zemi.” Rude Pravo [Czechoslovakia] 22 July 1969. 1. Print. This was helpful for us because it showed how the U.S. wasn’t the only ones effected by this event. This added more to our project so we had views from outside the US. Barbuor, John. “Alunizaron, Bajaron, Caminaron, Trabajaron: Proeza Lograda.” Excelsior [Mexico] 21 July 1969. 1. Print. The front page of this newspaper was extremely helpful to our project because we used it to see how this event impacted the whole world not just America. Beloff, Nora. “The Space Race: Experts Not Keen on Getting a Man on the Moon.” Age [Melbourne] 24 April 1962. 2. Print. This was an incredibly important article to use in out presentation so that we could see different opinions. This article talked about how some people did not want to go to the moon; we didn’t find many articles like this one. In most everything we have read it talks about the advantages of going to the moon. This is why this article was so unique and important. Canadian Press. “Half-billion Watch the Moon Spectacular.” Gazette [Montreal] 21 July 1969. 4. Print. This source gave us a clear idea about how big this event really was, not only was it a big deal in America, but everywhere else in the world. This article told how Russia and China didn’t have TV’s so they had to find other ways to hear about this event like listening to the radio.
  • Ackerman, Bruce

    Ackerman, Bruce

    e Decline and Fall of the American Republic BRUCE ACKERMAN T T L H V­ Delivered at Princeton University April – , is Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale and the author of een books that have had a broad inuence in political philosophy, constitutional law, and public policy. His major works include Social Justice in the Liberal State and his multivolume con- stitutional history, We the People. His most recent books are e Failure of the Founding Fathers () and Before the Next Attack (). His book e Stake Holder Society (with Anne Alstott) served as a basis for Tony Blair’s recent introduction of child investment accounts in the United Kingdom, and his book Deliberation Day (with James Fishkin) served as a basis for PBS Deliberation Day, a national series of citizen deliberations produced by McNeill-Lehrer on national television for the elec- tions. He also writes for the general public, contributing frequently to the New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times, and has served, without charge, as a lawyer on matters of public importance. He was a lead witness for President Clinton before the House Judiciary Com- mittee’s Impeachment Hearings and a principal spokesman for Al Gore before the Florida legislature during the election crisis of . Professor Ackerman is a member of the American Law Institute and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He is a Commander of the French Order of Merit and the recipient of the American Philosophical Society’s Henry Phillips Prize for Lifetime Achievement in Jurisprudence. LECTURE I. AN EXTREMIST PRESIDENCY Constitutional thought is in a triumphalist phase.
  • California State University, Northridge Low Earth Orbit

    California State University, Northridge Low Earth Orbit

    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE LOW EARTH ORBIT BUSINESS CENTER A Project submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering by Dallas Gene Bienhoff May 1985 The Proj'ectof Dallas Gene Bienhoff is approved: Dr. B. J. Bluth Professor T1mothy Wm. Fox - Chair California State University, Northridge ii iii ACKNOWLEDGEHENTS I wish to express my gratitude to those who have helped me over the years to complete this thesis by providing encouragement, prodding and understanding: my advisor, Tim Fox, Chair of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering; Dr. B. J. Bluth for her excellent comments on human factors; Dr. B. J. Campbell for improving the clarity; Richard Swaim, design engineer at Rocketdyne Division of Rockwell International for providing excellent engineering drawings of LEOBC; Mike Morrow, of the Advanced Engineering Department at Rockwell International who provided the Low Earth Orbit Business Center panel figures; Bob Bovill, a commercial artist, who did all the artistic drawings because of his interest in space commercialization; Linda Martin for her word processing skills; my wife, Yolanda, for egging me on without nagging; and finally Erik and Danielle for putting up with the excuse, "I have to v10rk on my paper," for too many years. iv 0 ' PREFACE The Low Earth Orbit Business Center (LEOBC) was initially conceived as a modular structure to be launched aboard the Space Shuttle, it evolved to its present configuration as a result of research, discussions and the desire to increase the efficiency of space utilization. Although the idea of placing space stations into Earth orbit is not new, as is discussed in the first chapter, and the configuration offers nothing new, LEOBC is unique in its application.
  • The Law As King and the King As Law: Is a President Immune from Criminal Prosecution Before Impeachment? Eric M

    The Law As King and the King As Law: Is a President Immune from Criminal Prosecution Before Impeachment? Eric M

    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 1992 The Law as King and the King as Law: Is a President Immune from Criminal Prosecution Before Impeachment? Eric M. Freedman Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation Eric M. Freedman, The Law as King and the King as Law: Is a President Immune from Criminal Prosecution Before Impeachment?, 20 Hastings Const. L.Q. 7 (1992) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/449 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Law as King and the King as Law: Is a President Immune from Criminal Prosecution Before Impeachment? By ERIC M. FREEDMAN* Table of Contents Introduction ................................................... 8 I. The Original Intents ................................. 15 II. The Historical Practice ............................... 22 A. The Federal Executive Branch ......................... 22 B. The Federal Judicial and Legislative Branches .......... 24 1. The Federal Judicial Branch ....................... 25 2. The Federal Legislative Branch ..................... 30 C. Federal Prosecution of State and Local Officials ......... 33 D. State-Level Practice ................................... 37 III. Theoretical Considerations ........................... 39 A. The Dual Nature of the Impeachment Clause .......... 41 B. The Rule of Law ...................................... 46 1. Civil Immunity .................................... 46 * Assistant Professor of Law, Hofstra University School of Law. J.D. 1979, B.A.
  • Gram, No In-Depth Cross-Correlation of the Voluminous Multidisciplinary Data Has Been Possible

    Gram, No In-Depth Cross-Correlation of the Voluminous Multidisciplinary Data Has Been Possible

    SKYLAB: A BEGINNING NationaZ Aeronautics and Space Ahinistration I Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center "The Eagle has landed; Tranquillity Base here." This simple and now historic message of July 20, 1969, marked the attainment of perhaps the greatest peacetime goal in the history of man. It fulfilled President Kennedy's directive issued some 8 short, hectic years earlier, when he proclaimed on May 25, 1961 : "I bel ieve we should go to the moon . before this decade is out." It marked the culmination of a technically complex engineering accomplishment that began with Mercury and continued uninterrupted through Gemini and prelunar Apollo. The ultimate goal of these efforts was a manned lunar landing. None of these programs had as a major objective the detailed study of man's biomedical responses to the space environment, except in the broadest sense of survival and the ability to live and work effectively in that environment. Nevertheless, throughout each program, information con- cerning man and his new surroundings was obtained wherever possible and whenever practicable, ever mindful of the time constraints imposed by the lunar landing goal and the weight limitations of the launch vehicles. In these few days, the preliminary biomedical results of NASA's Skylab effort have been presented to you. A major goal of Skylab was to learn more about man and his responses to the space environment for missions lasting up to 84 days. The results are necessarily prelimin- ary, for in the short time which has elapsed since the end of the pro- gram, no in-depth cross-correlation of the voluminous multidisciplinary data has been possible.
  • Gemini 6 Press

    Gemini 6 Press

    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION TELS. WO 2-4155 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20546 WO 3-6,925 FOR RELEASE: WEDNESDAY AM, S October 20, 1965 REUSE NO: 65-327 PROJECT: 6 CONTENTS Title Pa_e GENERAL NEWS RELEASE ........... '.......... 1-6 Orbits - Revolutions ...................... 7-10 Launch Vehicle Countdown .......... -....... ll-12 Experiments ............................... 13-I_ RadiationSynoptic Terrain...................Photography _ .................'.- 15,1b Synoptic Weather Photography ........... 17 Bio-Ch_mical Analysis of Body Fluids--- 17-18 70MMHasselblad Camera .................... 19 16MMMaurer Movie Camera .................. 20 Gemini 6 Nominal Maneuvers ................ 21 Checks while docked ....................... 22 Laser Beam0bservation .................... 23-24 Y_mmediate Preflight Crew Activities ....... 25-26 Mission Description ....................... 27-32 Manned Space Flight Tracking Network Gemini 6 Mission Requirements ........ 33 Tracking .................................. 34- 43 Network Configuration ..................... 44 Crew Safety ............................... _-47 Gemini Parachute Landing Sequence ......... 48 I AbortAtlanticProceduresRecovery..........................Area Communications ..... 49 Planned and Contingency Landing Areas ..... 50-51 Weather Requirements ...................... 52 Body Waste Disposal ....................... Gemini 6 Suit ............................. T FoodMedical.............Checks ............................"................ --- ..... 555_ WaherMen_s ...............Measuring
  • Spaceport News John F

    Spaceport News John F

    Aug. 9, 2013 Vol. 53, No. 16 Spaceport News John F. Kennedy Space Center - America’s gateway to the universe MAVEN arrives, Mars next stop Astronauts By Steven Siceloff Spaceport News gather for AVEN’s approach to Mars studies will be Skylab’s Mquite different from that taken by recent probes dispatched to the Red Planet. 40th gala Instead of rolling about on the By Bob Granath surface looking for clues to Spaceport News the planet’s hidden heritage, MAVEN will orbit high above n July 27, the Astronaut the surface so it can sample the Scholarship Foundation upper atmosphere for signs of Ohosted a dinner at the what changed over the eons and Kennedy Space Center’s Apollo/ why. Saturn V Facility celebrating the The mission will be the first 40th anniversary of Skylab. The of its kind and calls for instru- gala featured many of the astro- ments that can pinpoint trace nauts who flew the missions to amounts of chemicals high America’s first space station. above Mars. The results are Six Skylab astronauts partici- expected to let scientists test pated in a panel discussion dur- theories that the sun’s energy ing the event, and spoke about slowly eroded nitrogen, carbon living and conducting ground- dioxide and water from the Mar- breaking scientific experiments tian atmosphere to leave it the aboard the orbiting outpost. dry, desolate world seen today. Launched unpiloted on May “Scientists believe the planet 14, 1973, Skylab was a complex CLICK ON PHOTO NASA/Tim Jacobs orbiting scientific laboratory. has evolved significantly over NASA’s Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution (MAVEN) spacecraft rests on a processing the past 4.5 billion years,” said stand inside Kennedy’s Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility Aug.
  • Total Information Awareness Programs: Funding, Composition, and Oversight Issues

    Total Information Awareness Programs: Funding, Composition, and Oversight Issues

    Order Code RL31786 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Total Information Awareness Programs: Funding, Composition, and Oversight Issues Updated March 21, 2003 Amy Belasco Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Total Information Awareness Programs: Funding, Composition, and Oversight Issues Summary Late last year controversy erupted about a Department of Defense (DOD) R&D effort called Total Information Awareness (TIA) under an office headed by retired Admiral John D. Poindexter within the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). By integrating various new tools designed to detect, anticipate, train for, and provide warnings about potential terrorist attacks, DARPA hopes to develop a prototype Total Information Awareness system. This system would integrate a number of ongoing R&D efforts, referred to in this paper as Total Information Awareness programs. While concern has centered primarily on privacy issues, accounts of the program’s funding have also differed. This report covers the funding, composition, oversight, and technical feasibility of TIA programs. The privacy implications are addressed in CRS Report RL31730, Privacy: Total Information Awareness Programs and Related Information Access, Collection, and Protection Laws, by Gina Marie Stevens. In a press interview, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, Edward C. “Pete” Aldridge, stated that the Total Information Awareness project is funded at $10 million in FY2003 and $20 million in FY2004. Other reports indicated higher funding levels of over $100 million in FY2003 and over $200 million for the three-year period, FY2001 - FY2003. Different accounts of funding levels reflect the fact that DARPA is funding both an integrative effort called the TIA system, as well as 16 individual R&D efforts or TIA programs that could be combined to create that system.
  • Skylab 3 Crew Will Live and Work Aboard the Space

    Skylab 3 Crew Will Live and Work Aboard the Space

    4 NATIONALAERONAUTICSAND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Washington, D. C. 20546 _! 202-755-8370 FORRELEAS. E: July 23, 1973 p PROJECT: Second Manned3 Mission R E contents S GENERAL RELEASE ..................... i_5 OBJECTIVES OF THE SKYLAB PROGRAm4 ....... 8-10 S OBJECTIVESMISSION ..............................OF THE SECOND MANNED SKYLAB 11-12 MISSION PROFILE: LAUNCH, DOCKING AND DEORBIT ............... 13-18 COUNTDOWN AND LIFTOFF .................. 19-21 K SKYREAL-TIMELAB EXPERIMENTSFLIGHT PLANNING................................... 22-2426-28 ACCOMPLISHMENTS ........................ 35-39 SKYLAB BETWEEN 'VISITS .... - ............. 40-42 T_ SKYLAB ANDSTATUS:RELATEDWHATOBJECTSHAPPENEDVISIBLE............... 43-4429-34 NOTE: Details of the skylab spacecraft elements, systems, crew equipment and experimental hardware are contained in the Skylab News Reference distributed to the news media. The document also defines the scientific and technical objectives of Skylab activi- ties. This press kit confines its scope to the second manned visit to Skylab and briefly describes features of the mission. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Washington, D. C. 20546 he 202/ 5s-8370 _J' "FOR.RELEASE: William Pomeroy July 23, 1973 (Phone 202/755-3114) RELEASE NO. 73-131 NEXT SKYLAB CREW GOES UP JULY 28 Three American astronauts will begin a two-month stay• in space July 28 when the second Skylab crew is launched into orbit to man the Skylab space station. The second crew will further extend the long-term quest for knowledge about man's home planet, his Sun and himself which was begun by the Sky- lab 2 mission lasting 28 days. The Skylab 3 crew will live and work aboard the space station for up to 56 days while measuring the human adapta- bility to long-duration spaceflight, conducting solar astron- omy experiments above the distorting effects of the atmosphere, and surveying conditions and resources down on the fragile spacecraft Earth.
  • Gordon Woodcock Space Architecture Award 2020 Candidate: a Scott Howe

    Gordon Woodcock Space Architecture Award 2020 Candidate: a Scott Howe

    Gordon Woodcock Space Architecture Award 2020 Candidate: A Scott Howe To the AIAA Space Architecture Technical Committee, thank you very much for nominating me for this award. I feel humbled, and I’m sure there are many worthy candidates. I feel as though I have been busy in some distant corner of the field, but I am very pleased that Space Architecture has grown to what it is today. The following are my statements and comments as requested – please let me know if further information is needed. 1. Statement confirming you’ve been involved in the field for at least 10 years: I was at the impressionable age of 9 years old when Neil and Buzz walked on the moon and was interested in space ever since. However, the idea of working for NASA seemed way beyond my reach, and didn’t seem compatible with my desire to become an architect so I went straight into architecture. I worked in terrestrial architecture since 1978. A turning point came when I began working in Japan in 1988, and got involved with the folks doing robotic construction. I began considering the issue of large-scale construction using entirely autonomous, mechanized means, and in the late 1990’s was introduced to early AIAA Design Engineering Space Architecture WG efforts by Marc Cohen and Ted Hall. I submitted my first Space Architecture paper, discussing a robotic outpost construction system in 2000 and increased my involvement in AIAA after that. I became a full-time Space Architect in 2007 when I joined the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory and have been working on robotic construction for planetary surfaces, the design of outposts and habitats, and pressurized vehicles ever since that time.
  • Apollo 17 Press

    Apollo 17 Press

    7A-/ a NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Washington. D . C . 20546 202-755-8370 FOR RELEASE: Sunday t RELEASE NO: 72-220K November 26. 1972 B PROJECT: APOLLO 17 (To be launched no P earlier than Dec . 6) R E contents 1-5 6-13 U APOLLC 17 MISSION OBJECTIVES .............14 LAUNCH OPERATIONS .................. 15-17 COUNTDOWN ....................... 18-21 Launch Windows .................. 20 3 Ground Elapsed Time Update ............ 20-21 LAUNCH AND MISSION PROFILE .............. 22-32 Launch Events .................. 24-26 Mission Events .................. 26-28 EVA Mission Events ................ 29-32 APOLLO 17 LANDING SITE ................ 33-36 LUNAR SURFACE SCIENCE ................ 37-55 S-IVB Lunar Impact ................ 37 ALSEP ...................... 37 K SNAP-27 ..................... 38-39 Heat Flow Experiment ............... 40 Lunar Ejecta and Meteorites ........... 41 Lunar Seismic Profiling ............. 41-42 I Lunar Atmospheric Composition Experiment ..... 43 Lunar Surface Gravimeter ............. 43-44 Traverse Gravimeter ............... 44-45 Surface Electrical Properties 45 I-) .......... T Lunar Neutron Probe ............... 46 1 Soil Mechanics .................. 46-47 Lunar Geology Investigation ........... 48-51 Lunar Geology Hand Tools ............. 52-54 Long Term Surface Exposure Experiment ...... 54-55 -more- November 14. 1972 i2 LUNAR ORBITAL SCIENCE ............... .5 6.61 Lunar Sounder ................. .5 6.57 Infrared Scanning Radiometer ......... .5 7.58 Far-Ultraviolet Spectrometer ..........5
  • Skylab: the Human Side of a Scientific Mission

    Skylab: the Human Side of a Scientific Mission

    SKYLAB: THE HUMAN SIDE OF A SCIENTIFIC MISSION Michael P. Johnson, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2007 APPROVED: J. Todd Moye, Major Professor Alfred F. Hurley, Committee Member Adrian Lewis, Committee Member and Chair of the Department of History Sandra L. Terrell, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Johnson, Michael P. Skylab: The Human Side of a Scientific Mission. Master of Arts (History), May 2007, 115pp., 3 tables, references, 104 titles. This work attempts to focus on the human side of Skylab, America’s first space station, from 1973 to 1974. The thesis begins by showing some context for Skylab, especially in light of the Cold War and the “space race” between the United States and the Soviet Union. The development of the station, as well as the astronaut selection process, are traced from the beginnings of NASA. The focus then shifts to changes in NASA from the Apollo missions to Skylab, as well as training, before highlighting the three missions to the station. The work then attempts to show the significance of Skylab by focusing on the myriad of lessons that can be learned from it and applied to future programs. Copyright 2007 by Michael P. Johnson ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not be possible without the help of numerous people. I would like to begin, as always, by thanking my parents. You are a continuous source of help and guidance, and you have never doubted me. Of course I have to thank my brothers and sisters.