DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Conceptual Art the Four Uses of the Phrase «Conceptual Art» Singled by Brook Reveal a High Level of Davide Dal Sasso Ambiguity Due to Its Use

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Conceptual Art the Four Uses of the Phrase «Conceptual Art» Singled by Brook Reveal a High Level of Davide Dal Sasso Ambiguity Due to Its Use ARTICLES 101 Exploring Conceptual Art The four uses of the phrase «Conceptual Art» singled by Brook reveal a high level of Davide Dal Sasso ambiguity due to its use. Nominally we could Università di Torino use the phrase to refer to an artistic movement (Italia) or a general set of new experimental practices of the 60s that don’t accept the traditional methods of art making. In the first meaning 1. The Idealistic Obstinacy of the phrase is differently coined and used by Conceptual Art two artists1, and it is not completely working if referring to other kinds of artistic move- any philosophers and critics agree ments. Conceptual Art in this case would be that Conceptual Art is distin- the name of the artistic movement initially guished not only to be a loose col- based upon the creative activities and the Mlection of various practices but especially for critical statements of many different artists, its significant contradictions that increase the largely American2. In the second meaning in- theoretical controversy about it. stead, the phrase is used to describe a decisive According to the theorist Donald Brook tendency for the profound change of art due (1972) the phrase «Conceptual Art» has dif- to the new experimental practices of the 60s ferent senses and it is used with a general non- that also established a large part of the succes- acceptance. His argument is based on the fol- sive artistic evolution until today. lowing premises: (i) this obscure label refers The controversy about Conceptual Art is to many kinds of processes and objects; (ii) corroborated by this nominal ambiguity that artists’ justifications about them are vague; reflects: the uncertain nature of Conceptual (iii) their writings, in many cases, are in gib- Art, its invisible boundaries but, at the same berish. So defining Conceptual Art is a com- plex matter. Brook acknowledges that this dif- ficulty is related to four uses of the phrase: to 1 Henry Flynt in his Concept Art (1961) speaks about indicate a primacy of a conceptual approach an art whose material are «concepts»; Sol LeWitt in to art in contrast to the perceptual one; to em- his Paragraphs on Conceptual Art (1967) remarks the phasise that Conceptual Art is art of ideas and primacy of ideas in art. not art of physical objects; to claim that it is 2 In this view the main American conceptual artists also an artistic process based on a semantic were Robert Barry, Douglas Huebler, Joseph Ko- suth and Lawrence Weiner, supported by the gal- paradox that changes art and points out the lery director and intelligent divulger of their activi- critical approach to its nature; to remark the ties, Seth Siegelaub. Anyway, in a historical view, restricted meta-activity character through Sol LeWitt, Walter De Maria, Bruce Nauman, Hans which art became essentially a comment on it- Haacke, Robert Smithson, The Art & Language self. Group and many others are also considered as con- ceptualists. ISSUE VI – NUMBER 1 – SUMMER 2014 PHILOSOPHICAL READINGS 102 ARTICLES time, its visible heritage from Modernism3 and sues implied in them. Lastly, the third group also its questionable philosophical references of works, in which language and thought are upon which are based many of its different intriguing subjects to an obstinate model of practices. reflection, increases confusion and nonsense. Philosopher Richard Sclafani (1975) So Sclafani concludes that Conceptual Art is a doesn’t believe that the conceptual movement nonsensical and confused kind of art. has any implications for art or for philosophy. Consequently, the risk to define Concep- He grouped the conceptual works in three tual Art as not art or to assign it the «anti-art» categories: extra radical; quasi-philosophical label is very high. (based on a self-referential character); and Although it is also possible to define art ac- based on a language and thought model of re- cording to an institutional framework4, a flection. A conceptual confusion is to the basis problem still remains: how can we determine of the first group of works: it’s not possible the boundary between what is art and what is that if someone calls something «Art», then it not? Philosopher George Dickie (1975) ar- is art. Surely, the success of a conceptual art- gues that this was possible using the phrase work – also the famous urinal exhibited by «anti-art», especially to refer to actions and Duchamp – is strictly linked to the artistic statements of some artists: the performers. community context. But the contextual state- Actions and statements are not artefacts. Per- ments are not sufficient so that something be- formers don’t produce any material objects comes art. It seems that for conceptualists it through their actions and declarations, so they was impossible «to reject a claim of art status» make anti-art. As Dickie explains what per- (Sclafani 1975: 456). As Sclafani explains: formers do «is real anti-art: art because they «Not everyone can be an artist simply as he use the framework of the artworld, anti be- pleases, and not everything can be a work of cause they do nothing with it». For this rea- art simply on anyone say’s so. Without logi- sons they are «bureaucrats» because «they oc- cal constraints on artmaking and arthood, the cupy a niche in an institutional structure but concepts ‘artist’ and ‘work of art’ are rendered do nothing which is really productive» vacuous» (ibidem). With the extra-radical (Dickie 1975: 421). In his ontology of art artworks many conceptualists lose the Dickie doesn’t include artists’ actions and Duchamp’ lesson, since they claimed that it statements, and his theoretical perspective was essentially a contextual statement to con- seems to be in accordance with the one of the fer arthood. The quasi-philosophical works – dematerialisation of art – as described by largely based on incursions in analytical phi- losophy – prove an unfavourable intellectual 4 The institutional framework – as it as theorised by complexity, as a heritage of philosophical is- Dickie at this stage of his research – consists in a core of: (1) creators; (2) presenters; (3) appreciators; (4) theorists, critics and philosophers of art; (5) ex- 3 See Wood (2002). hibition machinery. See Dickie (1975). PHILOSOPHICAL READINGS ISSUE VI – NUMBER 2 – SUMMER 2014 ARTICLES 103 many artists and theorists5. If this is correct manifestations – concepts are imperceptible, then we could conclude that most of concep- instead their manifestation are perceptible – tual artworks are anti-art because they are Jamieson proposes to distinguish three kinds dematerialised. Once again, also with these of Conceptual Art in which: outlines of Dickie, the problem of a Concep- tual Art definition emerges (especially if we 1. Art object is imperceptible but its existence accept the dematerialisation of art’s topic). is contingent on its perceptible expression. According to philosopher Dale Jamieson 2. Art object is imperceptible and it has no (1986) literature about Conceptual Art is per- perceptible expression, but its existence is vaded by an «endemic confusion». It seems contingent on its apprehension by some audi- that defining Conceptual Art may be possible ence. only referring to the definitions of the concep- 3. Art object is imperceptible, it has no per- tual artists or to the descriptions of critics. ceptible expression, and it doesn’t need to be Both reveal a connection with the indetermi- apprehended by an audience. nacy of a presumed conceptual framework and with the absurd target of the demateriali- In his account Jamieson points out that in sation of art. About this second matter Jamie- first kind of Conceptual Art, objects are ma- son argues that «the claim that conceptualists terial supports and documentations of ideas. “eliminate” the art objects is nonsense» In the second kind conceptual artworks are (Jamieson 1986: 118). Conceptual artworks essentially thought as performances rather are objects. Without them there would be no than objects. Finally, in the third kind they are Conceptual Art. Moreover Jamieson faced similar to things yet not known that depend also other questions concerning: the concep- on some theory about them. About the second tual artworks classification – «why should kind of conceptual works Jamieson notes that earthworks be classed as conceptual piece?» viewing the artwork as a performance implies (ibidem); the inadequate conception of the any distinction between Conceptual Art and shift from object to concept (explained as the traditional one. About the third kind of criticism against economical market, com- works Jamieson points out a theory- modities and so on and so forth); the use of dependence of them: «[t]he point is that even word «conceptual» without reference to style, in order to grasp what the artwork in question time relations etc. If the term is used to speak is, one needs some theory about the nature of about the ontological and epistemological sta- conceptual artworks. Traditional artworks are tus of certain artworks, then we might differ- much more autonomous with respect to entiate them to the traditional ones. Focusing theory» (Jamieson 1986: 122). Concluding his on the relation between concepts and their account Jamieson pronounces also a verdict: «conceptual art has little to offer to aesthetic theory» (ibidem). Except one, other kinds of 5 See Lippard, Chandler (1968). Conceptual Art have been anticipated by phi- ISSUE VI – NUMBER 1 – SUMMER 2014 PHILOSOPHICAL READINGS 104 ARTICLES losophers: the first by Collingwood and the 2. Artworks as Conductors of second by Croce. However, the third seems Ideas to teach that «forgotten thoughts or things unknowable can be artworks» (ibidem). ince the 60s many conceptualists have These criticisms feed the controversy aimed to the dematerialisation of art about Conceptual Art. At the same time they objects essentially to defend first a not point out the idealistic trend that has charac- commercialS and anti-market art making and terised the first and radical productive period second a political approach integrated in their of Conceptual Art in which the main target productive activities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EDUCATOR GUIDE Story Theme: the Grey Eminences Subject: David Ireland Discipline: Visual Art (Conceptual)
    EDUCATOR GUIDE Story Theme: The Grey Eminences Subject: David Ireland Discipline: Visual Art (Conceptual) SECTION I - OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................2 EPISODE THEME SUBJECT CURRICULUM CONNECTIONS OBJECTIVE STORY SYNOPSIS INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES EQUIPMENT NEEDED MATERIALS NEEDED INTELLIGENCES ADDRESSED SECTION II – CONTENT/CONTEXT ..................................................................................................3 CONTENT OVERVIEW THE BIG PICTURE RESOURCES – TEXTS RESOURCES – WEBSITES RESOURCES – VIDEO BAY AREA FIELD TRIPS SELECTED CONCEPTUAL ARTISTS SECTION III – VOCABULARY.............................................................................................................9 SECTION IV – ENGAGING WITH SPARK ...................................................................................... 10 Artist David Ireland beside the entrance to his retrospective exhibition at the Berkeley Art Museum. Still image from SPARK story, 2004. SECTION I - OVERVIEW To learn to “read” Conceptual Artworks and EPISODE THEME understand how they communicate The Grey Eminences To help students think conceptually by looking at, talking about and making conceptual art SUBJECT To introduce students to creative ideation by David Ireland beginning instead of materials GRADE RANGES K-12 & Post-secondary EQUIPMENT NEEDED SPARK story about David Ireland on DVD or VHS CURRICULUM CONNECTIONS and related equipment Visual Art
    [Show full text]
  • The Post-Duchamp Deal. Remarks on a Few Specifications of the Word ‘Art’
    Filozofski vestnik volume/letnik XXviii • number/Številka 2 • 2007 • 27–38 The Post-Duchamp DeAl. Remarks on A FeW sPeCiFications oF tHe Word ‘art’ thierry de Duve When people began to talk in the ’60s of interdisciplinary trends in art, using terms such as ‘mixed media’, ‘intermedia’ and ‘multimedia art’, the primary focus was on finding a place for the new and quite diverse practices that could not be assigned to the traditional categories of painting and sculp- ture. those new names, as well as the descriptive terms ‘performance art’ or ‘installation art’, which were also new at that time, had a merely journalistic character. However, a more serious theoretical debate was simultaneously taking shape around Pop, Minimal and Conceptual Art, a debate in which the growing influence of Marcel Duchamp on this generation of artists and the impact of the readymade on artistic theories were palpable. By the end of the decade, the debate had reached academia. Philosophers who rarely set foot inside a gallery began to question the very concept of art, exemplified by borderline cases that were either real, such as Duchamp’s readymades and other ‘found objects’, or imaginary, such as the five red monochromes, identical but bearing different titles, which Arthur Danto (who does visit galleries more often than not) wittily proposed at the beginning of his book, The Transfiguration of the Commonplace.1 During the ’80s, my own work on the readymade has led me to study the relationship of painting, in particular, to art, in general, and then to develop an aesthetic theory of art as proper name, the result of a somewhat unexpected meeting of Duchamp with immanuel kant.2 What motivated me at the time was the mixture of excitement and anxiety produced by a situation that was an obvious legacy of the ready- made, namely, the radical openness of art (in the singular) resulting from 1 Arthur Danto, The Transfiguration of the Commonplace (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Aesthetic Experience of Postmodern Arts Between Creativity and Appreciation
    3-5 February 2014- Istanbul, Turkey 752 Proceedings of INTCESS14- International Conference on Education and Social Sciences Aesthetic Experience of Postmodern Arts Between Creativity and Appreciation Gihan Abou Elkheir Alexandria University, Egypt [email protected] Keywords: Aesthetic Experience, Postmodernity Arts, Art Appreciation Abstract. Modernity is not a departure from historical context. It goes back to the 14Th century. In fact, it was a search of identity. Color assumed sovereignty, meanwhile, Perspective became of minor importance, and pure image was the main issue. Modernity included a wide range of modern art movements, Styles such as were: performance, and conceptual Arts, were prominent. Main aspects of post Modernity were: Functionality, Abstract, and simplification. A tendency towards Consumables and every day's events were its main concerns. There was a close connection between artist and recipient, together with an ironical view towards the world, with a stress upon advertisements in media and everyday events. New thoughts came to existence, and there were radical changes of Criteria. Hence, the research introduces a concept for art appreciation through the new Aesthetic Criteria. The Researcher's assumptions revealed, in analytical approach, the impact of post modernity upon Egyptian Art movement. In her conclusion, the researcher found that the post modern artworks are integrated with the various environments. The recipient roles were always of prime importance. The Western Post modernity culture enhanced the free will, refusing centralized culture, and encompassed all sorts of contradictions, and that beseted unification and fragmentation. The study offered three examples, (three postmodern contemporary Egyptian artists), which confirm that: Artworks are integrated with their egyptian natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Art: a Critical Anthology
    Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology Alexander Alberro Blake Stimson, Editors The MIT Press conceptual art conceptual art: a critical anthology edited by alexander alberro and blake stimson the MIT press • cambridge, massachusetts • london, england ᭧1999 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval)without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in Adobe Garamond and Trade Gothic by Graphic Composition, Inc. and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Conceptual art : a critical anthology / edited by Alexander Alberro and Blake Stimson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-262-01173-5 (hc : alk. paper) 1. Conceptual art. I. Alberro, Alexander. II. Stimson, Blake. N6494.C63C597 1999 700—dc21 98-52388 CIP contents ILLUSTRATIONS xii PREFACE xiv Alexander Alberro, Reconsidering Conceptual Art, 1966–1977 xvi Blake Stimson, The Promise of Conceptual Art xxxviii I 1966–1967 Eduardo Costa, Rau´ l Escari, Roberto Jacoby, A Media Art (Manifesto) 2 Christine Kozlov, Compositions for Audio Structures 6 He´lio Oiticica, Position and Program 8 Sol LeWitt, Paragraphs on Conceptual Art 12 Sigmund Bode, Excerpt from Placement as Language (1928) 18 Mel Bochner, The Serial Attitude 22 Daniel Buren, Olivier Mosset, Michel Parmentier, Niele Toroni, Statement 28 Michel Claura, Buren, Mosset, Toroni or Anybody 30 Michael Baldwin, Remarks on Air-Conditioning: An Extravaganza of Blandness 32 Adrian Piper, A Defense of the “Conceptual” Process in Art 36 He´lio Oiticica, General Scheme of the New Objectivity 40 II 1968 Lucy R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Performance a Critical Anthology
    THE ART OF PERFORMANCE A CRITICAL ANTHOLOGY edited by GREGORY BATTCOCK AND ROBERT NICKAS /ubu editions 2010 The Art of Performance A Critical Anthology 1984 Edited By: Gregory Battcock and Robert Nickas /ubueditions ubu.com/ubu This UbuWeb Edition edited by Lucia della Paolera 2010 2 The original edition was published by E.P. DUTTON, INC. NEW YORK For G. B. Copyright @ 1984 by the Estate of Gregory Battcock and Robert Nickas All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review written for inclusion in a magazine, newspaper or broadcast. Published in the United States by E. P. Dutton, Inc., 2 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10016 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 79-53323 ISBN: 0-525-48039-0 Published simultaneously in Canada by Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Toronto 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 First Edition Vito Acconci: "Notebook: On Activity and Performance." Reprinted from Art and Artists 6, no. 2 (May l97l), pp. 68-69, by permission of Art and Artists and the author. Russell Baker: "Observer: Seated One Day At the Cello." Reprinted from The New York Times, May 14, 1967, p. lOE, by permission of The New York Times. Copyright @ 1967 by The New York Times Company.
    [Show full text]
  • ONCURATING.Org N
    ONN CURATING.org Issue 26 / October 2015 Notes on Curating, freely distributed, non-commercial Curating Degree Zero Archive: Curatorial Research With Contributions by Felix Ensslin Sabeth Buchmann Sergio Edelzstein Elke Krasny Avi Feldman Brian Holmes Ellen Blumenstein Dorothee Richter & Barnaby Drabble (eds.) Contents 02 86 Editorial “Something that has to do with life itself” Curating Degree Zero Archive: World of Matter and the Radical Imaginary Curatorial Research Brian Holmes Dorothee Richter and Barnaby Drabble 93 08 The Curator and Her Double. The Cruelty of Curating Degree Zero Archive 2003–2008 the Avatar Ellen Blumenstein 17 The Subject of Curating – Notes on the Path 101 towards a Cultural Clinic of the Present Thinking About Curatorial Education Felix Ensslin Dorothee Richter 32 110 Curating with/in the System Imprint Sabeth Buchmann 40 Are Boycotts the New “Collective Curating?” Sergio Edelsztein 51 Feminist Thought and Curating: On Method Elke Krasny 70 Performing Justice – From Dada’s Trial to Yael Bartana’s JRMiP Congress Avi Feldman Editorial Curating Degree Zero Archive: Curatorial Research Curating Degree Zero Archive. Curatorial Research Dorothee Richter & Barnaby Drabble When we started a discourse on curating in 1998 with the conference “Curating Degree Zero,” we could not have imagined the intensity of interest in this subject in the coming years. In 2003 we wanted to re-examine the field together with Annette Schindler, but when we failed to organise enough funds, we changed the concept and concentrated on the archive, which originally should have just accompanied the symposium. This decision, half by chance and half out of a deeply felt interest in archival practices, proved to be valid, insofar that the archive grew and developed rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Historical Settings Reverse
    15 PART 1: HISTORICAL SETTINGS REVERSE ENGINEERING MODERNISM WITH THE LAST AVANT-GARDE Dieter Daniels The concept of an avantgarde, disavowed by postmodern theory, is actually more relevant today than ever before, but it has nothing to do with aesthetics. Only social situations, not artworks, qualify as avantgarde. We need access to alternative experience, not merely new ideas, for we know more about our being than we have being for what we know. Today only metadesign satisfi es the original criteria for avantgarde practice. Gene Youngblood01 THE LAST AVANT-GARDE? The case studies analyzed, documented, and contextualized in the Net Pioneers research project provide a representative cross-section of the creation of Net-based art between 1992 and 1997.02 An entire typology of these new art forms developed in just fi ve years. This astonishing dynamic emerged from the particularly intense meeting and interaction of art history and media history: a rapidly developing, international art found itself racing a fast-changing techno-sociological context. As the 1990s drew on, a new browser interface known as the World Wide Web transformed the Internet from a non-public, mostly academic and military medium (with a gray area comprised of nerds and hackers) into a 01 Gene Youngblood, “Metadesign: Towards a Postmodernism of Reconstruction,” abstract for a lecture at Ars Electronica, 1986, http://90.146.8.18/en/archives/festival_archive/festival_catalogs/ festival_artikel.asp?iProjectID=9210. All Internet references in this volume last accessed on November
    [Show full text]
  • Curators, Their Personal Attributes, and Modes of Practice: a Historical Comparison
    Curators, Their Personal Attributes, and Modes of Practice: A Historical Comparison Author Ostling, Susan Published 2014 Journal Title International Journal of the Inclusive Museum Copyright Statement © The Author(s) 2014. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this journal please refer to the journal’s website or contact the author. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/69065 Link to published version https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-2014/CGP/v06i04/44476 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Curators, Their Personal Attributes, and Modes of Practice: A Historical Comparison Susan Ostling, Griffith University, Australia Abstract: The contemporary art curator’s role is one that appears to be so radically different from its immediate forebears. Were there precedents of curatorial practice I have wondered that would lead to a greater understanding of the contemporary art curator? In a rather speculative way I consider two ‘curators’ (though neither described themselves as this), working approximately 400 years apart: Ulisse Aldrovandi (1522-1605) a scholarly collector from Bologna and Seth Siegelaub working in New York (1967-1972) as an ‘exhibition organizer’. While the differences between the two figures’ life histories are of course considerable, there are nevertheless curious similarities in their personal attributes and approach to the shared enterprise of exhibiting objects. To undertake this analysis, I draw firstly on scholarly historical accounts of Aldrovandi as well as my own observations during a recent visit to view the remains of his collection in Bologna. In addition I undertake a discursive analysis of an interview I conducted with Siegelaub, and draw on Siegelaub’s published journal articles and other scholars’ writing on the emergence of conceptual art in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Curating With/In the System by Sabeth Buchmann
    Curating with/in the System Curating Degree Zero Archive: Curatorial Research Curating with/in the System by Sabeth Buchmann “Art without Artists?” It was under this alarmist title that, two years ago, the artist and e-flux co-founder Anton Vidokle criticized curators for claiming the status of artists and critics in an inadmissible manner. His finding was not new. It had already been a topic of discussion in the late sixties, when the curator and critic Lucy R. Lippard was accused of using the exhibitions she designed after the manner of the Concept Art of her day to stylize herself as an artist who regarded other artists merely as a medium.1 The polemic set forth by her colleague Peter Plagens in Artforum was a response to the first of the so-called “numbers exhibitions” Lippard staged between 1969 and 1973 in various locations and named after the size of the respective town’s population: 557,087 (Seattle Art Museum, 1969), 955,000 (Van- couver Art Gallery, 1970), 2,972,453 (Centro de Arte y Comunicación in Buenos Aires, 1970) and c. 7500 (California Institute of the Arts in Valencia, California, 1973). The exhibition catalogues were loosely bound bundles of 5x8-inch index cards designed by the participating artists and exchanged and supplemented by new ones from one venue to the next. This flexible and modular exhibition and publication model points on the one hand to the predilection—typical of Concept Art at the time—for mundane information design as well as non-hierarchical compi- lations and the equal value of objects, idea sketches, texts, drawings, photographs, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Pragmatics and New Co-Efficiencies in Contemporary Art
    MIGRATORY PROJECTS: PRAGMATICS AND NEW CO-EFFICIENCIES IN CONTEMPORARY ART 2003 - 2005 Andrew Sunley Smith A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Fine Arts Faculty of Fine Arts University of New South Wales 1 Research Abstract The thesis aims to examine, document and prove that the core strategies underlying and inherent within contemporary relational art practices stem not only from pragmatic philosophy but also from a number of key artists previously unaddressed within the context of these ideas. This thesis will provide a critical reference and document that previously has not yet existed in any clear form, locating existing literature, ideas and forms of art in linked sequences that collate and cohesively align the recent history, origins and definitions of this type of work. The thesis will demonstrate that co-efficient and relational art, are indeed the forerunners to contemporary pragmatic art forms, but crucially theses above definitions are in fact the constituent sub- categories of the broader aspirational form of egalitarian pragmatic art that we are seeing today. The primary lines of enquiry are to show that American Pragmatism is an essential aspect of relational aesthetics that Nicolas Bourriaud has not examined in his key text. I also wish to prove that American Pragmatism was a major cultural and sociological influence leading to relational aesthetics that Bourriaud neglected to identify. This thesis intends not only to prove the veracity of the above observations but by extension the intentions of this document are also to function as an essential genealogy of the type of artwork that I am discussing, examining and revealing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Function of a Postmodern Pragmatic Aesthetic in Linda Montano's "Living Art"
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 12-2004 Inducing Knowledge by Enduring Experience: the Function of a Postmodern Pragmatic Aesthetic in Linda Montano's "Living Art". Alisa Anne Brandenburg East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Art and Design Commons Recommended Citation Brandenburg, Alisa Anne, "Inducing Knowledge by Enduring Experience: the Function of a Postmodern Pragmatic Aesthetic in Linda Montano's "Living Art"." (2004). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 970. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/970 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Inducing Knowledge by Enduring Experience: The Function of a Postmodern Pragmatic Aesthetic in Linda Montano’s Living Art ___________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Art and Design East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Art History ___________ by Alisa A. Brandenburg December 2004 ___________ Dr. Scott Koterbay, Chair Dr. Vida Hull Dr. Peter Pawlowicz Keywords: aesthetics, art history, performance art, philosophy ABSTRACT Inducing Knowledge by Enduring Experience: The Function of a Postmodern Pragmatic Aesthetic in Linda Montano’s Living Art by Alisa A. Brandenburg In Has Modernism Failed? (1984), Suzi Gablik calls for a postmodern art that has preserved the values that modernism lost over the 20th century, stating that only through "direct knowing" may we be shocked out of art-for-art's-sake.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcel Duchamp and the Perceptual Dimension of Conceptual Art
    chapter 3 Marcel Duchamp and the Perceptual Dimension of Conceptual Art Conceptual Art is often considered to be without a perceptual dimension, even though it is classified with the visual arts.1 Nonetheless, the critique of formalism advanced by Conceptual Art cannot be totally divorced from perception in favour of ‘pure’ concepts, without eliminating the contextual character of this art. To deny the contextuality of these concepts, however, would be to dismiss the very position without which idea as art is inconceivable when it is also without a perceptual ingress. As will become clear, this paradox has resulted more from the inadequacy of the standard critical response to Conceptual Art, than from the inadequacies of Conceptual Art itself. Just as Merleau-Ponty has noted that in perception there is no vision without thought, so in Conceptual Art there is no concept without precepts. In addressing the perceptual dimension of Conceptual Art, I will necessar- ily consider another issue, namely, the relationship of art to aesthetics. Using the word ‘aesthetics’ to mean the experience of sensual form, rather than any science of the beautiful, I will discuss the anxious, but never truncated, rela- tionship of art to aesthetics in Idea Art. Duchamp’s readymades, as well as the ‘dematerialised’ and supposedly ‘objectless’ art of the Conceptual move- ment have not really sequestered cognition from perception, information from experience, or ideas from objects. To a considerable degree, the opposite has occurred. Although Idea Art has highlighted how we conceive art, it has con- tributed much to a self-consciousness about how we perceive art.
    [Show full text]