DOCSLIB.ORG

87C9db1db2e8c3f3e88b32bdfb2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
87C9db1db2e8c3f3e88b32bdfb2 Aesthetics of Installation Art ± ƜE Ɯ ýýaäý ý ; ƜƜhP Ɯ; Ɯ a õƜƜJËh Ɯ A :ƜD Ɯg ƜƜ9 Ɯk Ɯ ; :ƜhƜ* Ɯ D:Ɯ6 ƜE Ɯ6 ƜJ Ɯh Ɯ? ð3 ƜƜ6Ɯ Vh?bƜ ÎFv(v =((H>v4 Ë4Ɯ ėƜ)24)Ɯ± ƜE ƜhP Ɯ; Ɯ * Ɯ Ɯ Ɯ ƜƜ ƜƜ ƜƜ Ɯ ƜƜ ĖƜƜ Ɯ ÆKƜ W Ɯ ƜƜ, ý ýD åý ėƜ)22(Ɯh$ Ɯ¡ Ɯ3 ĖƜÆƜ6Ɯ * Ɯ Ɯ ƜƜ Ɯ Ɯ Ɯh Ɯ¡ Ɯ? #Ɯ 81;)<C IK ƀ9 ȿ] 7< ȿ:ȿ Dȿ¢9< ȿ C CC êë "&%) 5ë # ($%') *ë bÙéFÚÉë 8$E> 6 EA 81&DE C&11E *2ë Ù GQÚÉ# 3.ADE 8$EA,&E BA;8;6DE;'E >AE.#, &1E>.&$E ,9ë Së ǰŨįî£Q9 ȿ9 7ȿ69 ȿ /9ë V [ ōÝĦ9$<9 89 ȿ9 7ȿ+<ȿcF< ȿ 5*ë )" %') 7/ë YÙé|Þ«ë 8$E;>6E1&6&8AE>&&8"&>+E.01 ?EB,6 88E 79ë Aǧë 9$EA,&E >A?E,&;$;>Eeë $;>8;E 99ë Së ÜÅÐæQȿ9 7ȿđ+<ȿNȿ &,ë W[ ÜÅÐǕQȿ9 7ȿđ#9 ȿ &&2ë %ë ÜÅÐæȿ9 7ȿ+ ȿ &*7ë ^¾nÛo¨ë 8$E.6& ?&%E >AEEDë &??.8+E!#=B&?E&>>.$ E &/&ë Rë Ý£ȿ¿9 ȿN9<ȿȿL9 7<9ȿ,9ȿ.D7ȿN /ȿ &/5ë [ Ý£ȿN99 ȿ,ȿµ9<9 ȿ' 9 9 ȿ.' 9ȿb99/ȿ &22ë %ë >ëŔĮ?99*<ȿ' 9= 9 ȿ.AȿDȿE9 ȿA 9 /ȿ &7&ë çSë Ġ7ȿ' 9 9 ȿ.,*7ȿEȿ +7ľȿN9 ȿ29 /ȿ &97ë " ) ! %') **ë Aȧë o8%E< #&E >A.8E&.$&++&>E **2ë Që [ Ü¥Ƭ<ȿ9 7ȿN9<ȿ **7ë Y[ Ġ£ÆÆ$1ȿÊȿ N ȿ#Źȿ ,ȿDN ȿ *,ë %ë ÝÌȿù 9ȿȿ+ȿ9 7ȿN9<ȿ */ë 2:@/ A.;8E 8$E8A&>C&8A.;8E *2&ë Rëë ƍzțÆ$T 9 ȿ2¸ȿ *2*ë X[ 'ëkÆȿ9 7ȿ <ȿ *5,ë %ë ū£:<ȿN<ȿ *57ë ') *75ë 9 lȿN ȿ ȿȿȿ< ȿȿȿȿ ȿ ¸ ȿȿ < ȿ<ȿ<_ȿµȿ< <7ȿȿ7 ȿ ȿ ȿȿȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ7<ȿȿ< ȿ < < ȿȿȿ' ȿ ȿ7ȿĆȿȿ< <ȿȿȿȿȿ ȿȿ= ȿµȿȿ<ȿȿ ȿȿ<Iȿȿȿȿ7ȿ ȿ 7ȿȿȿȿ ȿµȿ ȿȿȿ7ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿ_ȿ@ ȿȿȿ 7ȿ ȿȿȿȿ = ȿ7ȿ ȿ ȿȿȿȿ< ȿ 7ȿȿȿ7_ȿEȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ=ȿ ȿȿȿ<ȿȿȿȿȿǒ 7 ȿ ȿȿ7ȿĆ<ȿ7<ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ< ȿ ȿ'ȿ= ȿȒȿȿȿ ȿ _ȿ#ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿȿȿ <ȿȿȿ ľ ȿ< < ȿ ȿ ȿ<<ȿ 7ȿȿ¸ ȿȿȿ:ZU:=_kȿȿ<ȿ< ȿȿ 7ȿ?ȿ7 ȿȿ<<?ȿ < ȿȿȿ ȿȿ <7ȿȿI<=ȿ<_ȿ N =ȿȿ<ȿȿȿ ȿ¸ ȿȿ < ȿ<ȿ ȿ ȿȿ 0ȿȿ7 7ȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ << ȿ7< Cȿ &< ȿ ȿȿ<ȿȿ=< ȿ <ȿ=ȿ#ȿȿ¸ ȿȿ=< ȿ<ȿ7ȿ ȿ< ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ6i ȿ¸ rȿȿȿȿȿ<ȿȿ<ȿ ȿȿȿ< <ȿ<ȿ<<ȿ < ȿ<ȿ< ȿ ȿ ȿ<ȿȿȿ<C<ȿ<<C ȿȿ./< < ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ<ȿȿ ȿ2 < ȿ 7ȿ<ȿ<<ȿȿ ȿ ȿ=ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ rȿȿȿ <ȿ 7ȿĆȿ< ȿ ȿ ȿȿ =ȿ7ȿȿ ȿȿȿȿ7ȿȿ ȿ ȿ¢ȿȿȿ<<ȿȿȿ7ȿ ȿȿȿȿȿȿ < ȿȿ ȿ < ȿ ¸ ȿ < ȿ<ȿȿȿ7ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ < <ȿȿȿ<ȿȿ< ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ<Ȥ< ȿ ȿ µȿ<ȿ 7 ȿ7<ȿȿ ȿ<<ȿ 7ȿȿ<ȿ ȿ ȿ7 < ȿ7 7ȿ ȿ ȿ ,Ɯ§ ƜgijƜEƜ0îý8 Ìýý Výý ýýa ý ý /. ƜL*:ƜLVAƜ; Ɯ7 -Ɯ@]@`Ɯ ƜbŲ Ɯ ƜW Ɯ ĚnƜ a ý ý / :ƜAƜëg Ɯ 4 =-ƜF^Ɯ \ȿ ¬-ȿ 'ȿ*I Iȿ ȿȿƵ ȿȿaȿ fȿ MUȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿI ȿ ȿ| ȿaȿ |ȿ ȿ ķQþ fȿ ȿ ȿȿIaȿ|ȿȿ I¯ ȿȿȿȿä ȿ_ȿcafȿ »ȿȿȿ*I* |ȿ ȿ aȿa* fȿ ȿȿ § Ę7;ȿ ȿ |ȿ |=ȿȿaȿȿȿZ Iȿ|ȿȿ ¬¥ȿ IȿIC ȿȿȿȿHȿȿIIȿ ȿ Ïȿ7 a ȿ ȿ nȿNIIfȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ Ę7;Xȿ ȿ aȿ ȿȿ I IȿIa ȿ IIȿ âe ȿ.ȿIȿ HZxȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿ ) Ķ¥¤ ȿ ȿaȿ ȿȿ I ȿȚȿ ȿȿ Iȿ|-ȿ ȿ aȿfȿ*fȿ ȿ±ȿȿI* Iȿ ȿ Ǵ¤ȿȿ ȿ|ȿȿȿȿ ȿȿaȿ | ȿ þȿ IIȿ7 ȿIȿxȿ+ ;XȿOȿ Iȿ ȿ ȿ ¬ȿ 1ȿ |ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿȿ ǻÏQeȿ%a ȿȿ* ȿ -ȿ' fȿȿI IIȿ Åãy± ȿ aȿ ȿ ȿfȿȿIȿ ȿD fȿȿ ȿ ¥¬Ȏåȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ=UE6EIUE ȿ ȿ ýz7ēȿ fȿȿ ä ȿ ȿȿa ȿ=y_=bI=U:=,ȿ ȉȳÌ ȿȿaȿ aȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿiu9Zb<IU6k=< îȿUȿȿȿ ä ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿGȿ ȿ ưǢ fȿ ȿȿfȿȿ ȿ |ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ®àþ ȿȿȿO |ȏfȿ ä IIȿ ȿ _ȿ+ |fȿ ŒƜ A Ɯfë* Ɯ ý>@ý iƜE Ɯg ĪS Ɯ çÕ :Ɯy ƜƜ6Ɯ; Ɯ 7 N-CƜ^Ɯ (=(^Ɯ ćãƜ ƜTƜƜ 1:ƜEØ Ɯ? Ɯ, ý ý/3 ƜƜ6:Ɯ œ£ Ɯ 7 F -`Ɯ. Ɯ3 ƜN )Ûýý{ ý ý çÕ£ :ƜJ Ɯ3Ɯ¡ Ɯ)227-`Ɯk 3 Ŷ Ɯ,: ý ýý æé ý w Kýý7" ý/3 ƜƜ6:Ɯ, Ɯ 7 H-`Ɯ żŽƜEƋƜkúƜ ýQ ýý1 >ý` @ý ^Ɯ6 Ɯ ă1Ɯ/6 :Ɯy ƜƜ6Ɯ; Ɯ7 F)-`Ɯ* ƜSƜW ½ý eõñKýý ý ýO ý ý ý-ý/3 £ ƜƜ6ĿƜ ă£ Ɯ)222-`Ɯ.ƆƜ 6Ɯ ýW & 5ýý Ký ýL&5ýý ²Åìýý' /ý ^Ɯb Ɯ, Ɯ/. Ɯ6*:Ɯ6VAƜ; Ɯ 7 -`ƜJ Ɯ ōşâž Ɯ ^Ɯt ý ý/; :Ɯ 3 Ɯ, ´Ɯ ŔĊ Ɯ 7 F7Ɯ-`Ɯ6 Ɯ,æƜ'ý-ý ý).KýNý 2 Òý ýÖ ý ¾Âh {ý /j Ä ƜƜ6:Ɯ , Ɯ 7 F>-`ƜEƜ, Ɯ0Ù ýý ´ühd ýýW ¬ý` mý ' ýý ýý ý-ý ğņ QūƜƜ6:Ɯ, Ɯ)222-`Ɯ* % ƜJ Ɯ &AƌƜ , Ɯ ŐĊŠã :Ɯ* {Ɯ* ƜE ƜƜ6 'ƜƜý! ý ºë¼ 5Ký$ýý mý ?ýý!=@ý ^Ɯ D Ɯ ÕųŢŬâƜ/. Ɯ6*:Ɯ6VAƜ; Ɯ7 7-CƜ 7](>^Ɯ Rȿ 9 ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿgȿȿ fȿfȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ0 ȿ ) ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿȿȿȿ ȿ@ ȿ?ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿĭȿǐȿ ȿ+ ;Xȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ.ȿ ȿ ȿ]/ȿ ȿȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ;¤0ȿȿ fȿȿ ȿȿȿȿ ȿȿfȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿpȿ fȿ ȿȿ ȿ fȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿpȿȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ Eȿȿ ȿȿȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ 0 ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ 0 ȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿfȿȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ Aȿȿ fȿ'ȿ fȿȿ ȿ Aȿ 0ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ 0 ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ %ȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ+ ȿ ȿȿ fȿȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ,ȿ ȿȿ -ȿ'ȿ ȿȿȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ Gȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿb ȿ0ȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ 0 ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ,ȿ ȿ'ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ w ȿȿȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ+ȿȿȿ>R[Kȿcň ȿ A ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿ;ȿȿb ȿ ȿ ȿ 0 ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ 0ƫǭłȅȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ{ȿEȿA fȿȿ ȿ =Ɯ ,Ɯ* PƜ#d# ý d#>/ý(((]>xƜ >mȿ 5#Ú@$É.Ī 7Qȿȿ I ȿȿhȿI ȿ ȿȿȿ ²Kç!Ī éĩȿȿȿȿȿ Ihȿŵȿ'ȿI ȿ Iȿȿ ȿȿ Ȉ į6Ńkm Iȿ"ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿhȿA ȿ ȿ §#Ī (Ī=ĔqĪ hȿȿȿ ȿȿȿȿȿȿȿȿ ȿ KĪ 1 Ī ȿI;ȿIȿȿ ȿ B ȿ ȿȿȿ e6Bm Ī ȿȿȿȿ-ȿ![ @ȿ ȿȿIȿȿ & ȿ Ĥáǔ ȿ ȿb _ȿ2 ȿȿ ȿ ȿ Iȿ ȿ ?HĪŃéeȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿIȿ ?Ī "Ī ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿb ȿ ȿȿȿIȿȿ #PÎ Ī ȿ ¤ ȿ I .ȿ ȿȿ I/ȿȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ e@$$ /ĪIh ȿȿ9=r==U ȿ ȿ _ȿ+ ȿ ȿ ($Ī Pë ĝĪ I ȿ ȿȿ Iȿȿ IhȿIUb=O6kIZUȿ ȿ (à$=HF Ī rȿ |hȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ Ihȿhȿ áÆØÝëĩȿ ȿȿ ȿ _ȿ,ȿ ȿ ȿ ü(Ī k Ī ȿ & ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ #PÏ0 ĪT¤Ihȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿȿ ƱÅý®Ĉ ȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ -ȿ,ȿ ȿ ȿ [Åëý㤠ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ?Īȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ%) ª6 K7Ihȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿȿȿ DZǮǯčMȣMȿI ȿ |Iȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ hȿȿ ?Ī @Êë ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿȿhȿ Ê=Ī ȿȿIIȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿxȿȿȿȿ ö Ī ȿ Iȿ ȿhȿȿȿȿ & ȿ ȿȿ Ī k̤ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ¡ Ī Iȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿI ȿȿIȿ 6Ī" Ī Q¤ ȿ Ihȿ ȿ & ȿ |ȿȿ ȿȿ ³o Ī S ȿȿȿIȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ őĈ X Ɯ? Ɯ&Ŏ ƜXƜ ? Ɯ1ŷ Ɯ÷X'ƜƜL ý eÈÇÚÐËý! ý >Ɯ/7 N(-¯Ɯ(F]N( Ɯ ƜXƜ ? Ɯ,: ý@ý нë Ĺ ])2Ɯ ((](=Ɯ== [ ýQƜQƜ Ɯ? Ɯ Ɯ ƜƜ Ɯ Ɯ ƜƜƜ1 KƜ ĄċċƜEĈ Ɯ? Ɯ&D X Ɯ Ɯ9c'ƜƜt ýý eèò)@ý [Ɯ§j Ø Ɯ Ɯ§´ ƜªX Ɯ/j ƜƜ6X:Ɯ Ą£ Ɯ)224-ƜNNí 2KƜ ýƑƜXƎƜX ƜƜƜ Ɯ ƜƜ Ɯ Ɯ ƜƜƜ ţX XxƜ,Ɯ9 Ɯ?Ɯ&DƜJ Ɯ Ɯ; cú'ƜXƜ'ý -. @ý xƜ ŗX âXƜW ØʼnŊ Ɯ/; ­:Ɯj X Ɯ, ´XƜ¡ Ɯ 7 F(-Ɯ()H](FKƜ >>ȿ 9 ȿȿ#ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ; ȿȿ ȿȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ% ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿIT_OI=iȿ% ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ,çȿȿ% ȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ,ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿtȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ? ȿȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿƿȿȿ ȿ. ȿȿ rȿȿKJK/ȿ'ȿw ȿ ȿ ȿȿ 8 ȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ W ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ'ȿȿ? ȿȿȿ% ȿȿHZxȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ 'ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ; ȿȿ ȿȿ^ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ; ȿȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ0ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ == ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ' = ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ%ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ;ȿȿȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿw ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ' ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ? ȿ ȿ H ȿȿȿ Gȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ;ȿ ȿ ȿOȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ;ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿOȿ ȿAȿ ȿȿ'ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿAȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿȿȿȿ ȿOȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿȿȿ & ȿȿ) ȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ;?ȿ Aȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ#ȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿ >Jȿ Të ę CĪ }$1$ ȿȿȿ"ȿȿ ȿa-ȿ ,ȿȿȿ ,&-/[ ıŐȿ·Ī Q ȿȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ȿȿĬȿ * D.:6<<IKOȿȿȿȿ -ȿ2Ò ȿȿ ȿ E (-+;C4Kȿ ȿȿȿȿ ȿ ȿȿ Ñ@ÿ; Ī$ȿȿ ȿȿ ȿ ǀȿ ȿ ȿ ĆĪF .K ȿȿȿȿ ȿȿ F!H6<BK ȿ ȿ ȿ%ȿ /ȿȿ i G"&?K #,&4Kȿȿ 0ȿȿ -ȿ' ȿ ȿȿ ƳȁÇz°£QȿO$ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ ȿ% ȿ ȿȿ ȿ 37C£ćĪáQ$$ $ȿ ȿȿ ȿ.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EDUCATOR GUIDE Story Theme: the Grey Eminences Subject: David Ireland Discipline: Visual Art (Conceptual)
    EDUCATOR GUIDE Story Theme: The Grey Eminences Subject: David Ireland Discipline: Visual Art (Conceptual) SECTION I - OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................2 EPISODE THEME SUBJECT CURRICULUM CONNECTIONS OBJECTIVE STORY SYNOPSIS INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES EQUIPMENT NEEDED MATERIALS NEEDED INTELLIGENCES ADDRESSED SECTION II – CONTENT/CONTEXT ..................................................................................................3 CONTENT OVERVIEW THE BIG PICTURE RESOURCES – TEXTS RESOURCES – WEBSITES RESOURCES – VIDEO BAY AREA FIELD TRIPS SELECTED CONCEPTUAL ARTISTS SECTION III – VOCABULARY.............................................................................................................9 SECTION IV – ENGAGING WITH SPARK ...................................................................................... 10 Artist David Ireland beside the entrance to his retrospective exhibition at the Berkeley Art Museum. Still image from SPARK story, 2004. SECTION I - OVERVIEW To learn to “read” Conceptual Artworks and EPISODE THEME understand how they communicate The Grey Eminences To help students think conceptually by looking at, talking about and making conceptual art SUBJECT To introduce students to creative ideation by David Ireland beginning instead of materials GRADE RANGES K-12 & Post-secondary EQUIPMENT NEEDED SPARK story about David Ireland on DVD or VHS CURRICULUM CONNECTIONS and related equipment Visual Art
    [Show full text]
  • The Post-Duchamp Deal. Remarks on a Few Specifications of the Word ‘Art’
    Filozofski vestnik volume/letnik XXviii • number/Številka 2 • 2007 • 27–38 The Post-Duchamp DeAl. Remarks on A FeW sPeCiFications oF tHe Word ‘art’ thierry de Duve When people began to talk in the ’60s of interdisciplinary trends in art, using terms such as ‘mixed media’, ‘intermedia’ and ‘multimedia art’, the primary focus was on finding a place for the new and quite diverse practices that could not be assigned to the traditional categories of painting and sculp- ture. those new names, as well as the descriptive terms ‘performance art’ or ‘installation art’, which were also new at that time, had a merely journalistic character. However, a more serious theoretical debate was simultaneously taking shape around Pop, Minimal and Conceptual Art, a debate in which the growing influence of Marcel Duchamp on this generation of artists and the impact of the readymade on artistic theories were palpable. By the end of the decade, the debate had reached academia. Philosophers who rarely set foot inside a gallery began to question the very concept of art, exemplified by borderline cases that were either real, such as Duchamp’s readymades and other ‘found objects’, or imaginary, such as the five red monochromes, identical but bearing different titles, which Arthur Danto (who does visit galleries more often than not) wittily proposed at the beginning of his book, The Transfiguration of the Commonplace.1 During the ’80s, my own work on the readymade has led me to study the relationship of painting, in particular, to art, in general, and then to develop an aesthetic theory of art as proper name, the result of a somewhat unexpected meeting of Duchamp with immanuel kant.2 What motivated me at the time was the mixture of excitement and anxiety produced by a situation that was an obvious legacy of the ready- made, namely, the radical openness of art (in the singular) resulting from 1 Arthur Danto, The Transfiguration of the Commonplace (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12. the Avant-Garde in the Late 20Th Century 1
    Chapter 12. The Avant-Garde in the Late 20th Century 1 The Avant-Garde in the Late 20th Century: Modernism becomes Postmodernism A college student walks across campus in 1960. She has just left her room in the sorority house and is on her way to the art building. She is dressed for class, in carefully coordinated clothes that were all purchased from the same company: a crisp white shirt embroidered with her initials, a cardigan sweater in Kelly green wool, and a pleated skirt, also Kelly green, that reaches right to her knees. On her feet, she wears brown loafers and white socks. She carries a neatly packed bag, filled with freshly washed clothes: pants and a big work shirt for her painting class this morning; and shorts, a T-shirt and tennis shoes for her gym class later in the day. She’s walking rather rapidly, because she’s dying for a cigarette and knows that proper sorority girls don’t ever smoke unless they have a roof over their heads. She can’t wait to get into her painting class and light up. Following all the rules of the sorority is sometimes a drag, but it’s a lot better than living in the dormitory, where girls have ten o’clock curfews on weekdays and have to be in by midnight on weekends. (Of course, the guys don’t have curfews, but that’s just the way it is.) Anyway, it’s well known that most of the girls in her sorority marry well, and she can’t imagine anything she’d rather do after college.
    [Show full text]
  • Aesthetic Experience of Postmodern Arts Between Creativity and Appreciation
    3-5 February 2014- Istanbul, Turkey 752 Proceedings of INTCESS14- International Conference on Education and Social Sciences Aesthetic Experience of Postmodern Arts Between Creativity and Appreciation Gihan Abou Elkheir Alexandria University, Egypt [email protected] Keywords: Aesthetic Experience, Postmodernity Arts, Art Appreciation Abstract. Modernity is not a departure from historical context. It goes back to the 14Th century. In fact, it was a search of identity. Color assumed sovereignty, meanwhile, Perspective became of minor importance, and pure image was the main issue. Modernity included a wide range of modern art movements, Styles such as were: performance, and conceptual Arts, were prominent. Main aspects of post Modernity were: Functionality, Abstract, and simplification. A tendency towards Consumables and every day's events were its main concerns. There was a close connection between artist and recipient, together with an ironical view towards the world, with a stress upon advertisements in media and everyday events. New thoughts came to existence, and there were radical changes of Criteria. Hence, the research introduces a concept for art appreciation through the new Aesthetic Criteria. The Researcher's assumptions revealed, in analytical approach, the impact of post modernity upon Egyptian Art movement. In her conclusion, the researcher found that the post modern artworks are integrated with the various environments. The recipient roles were always of prime importance. The Western Post modernity culture enhanced the free will, refusing centralized culture, and encompassed all sorts of contradictions, and that beseted unification and fragmentation. The study offered three examples, (three postmodern contemporary Egyptian artists), which confirm that: Artworks are integrated with their egyptian natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Art: a Critical Anthology
    Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology Alexander Alberro Blake Stimson, Editors The MIT Press conceptual art conceptual art: a critical anthology edited by alexander alberro and blake stimson the MIT press • cambridge, massachusetts • london, england ᭧1999 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval)without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in Adobe Garamond and Trade Gothic by Graphic Composition, Inc. and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Conceptual art : a critical anthology / edited by Alexander Alberro and Blake Stimson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-262-01173-5 (hc : alk. paper) 1. Conceptual art. I. Alberro, Alexander. II. Stimson, Blake. N6494.C63C597 1999 700—dc21 98-52388 CIP contents ILLUSTRATIONS xii PREFACE xiv Alexander Alberro, Reconsidering Conceptual Art, 1966–1977 xvi Blake Stimson, The Promise of Conceptual Art xxxviii I 1966–1967 Eduardo Costa, Rau´ l Escari, Roberto Jacoby, A Media Art (Manifesto) 2 Christine Kozlov, Compositions for Audio Structures 6 He´lio Oiticica, Position and Program 8 Sol LeWitt, Paragraphs on Conceptual Art 12 Sigmund Bode, Excerpt from Placement as Language (1928) 18 Mel Bochner, The Serial Attitude 22 Daniel Buren, Olivier Mosset, Michel Parmentier, Niele Toroni, Statement 28 Michel Claura, Buren, Mosset, Toroni or Anybody 30 Michael Baldwin, Remarks on Air-Conditioning: An Extravaganza of Blandness 32 Adrian Piper, A Defense of the “Conceptual” Process in Art 36 He´lio Oiticica, General Scheme of the New Objectivity 40 II 1968 Lucy R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Performance a Critical Anthology
    THE ART OF PERFORMANCE A CRITICAL ANTHOLOGY edited by GREGORY BATTCOCK AND ROBERT NICKAS /ubu editions 2010 The Art of Performance A Critical Anthology 1984 Edited By: Gregory Battcock and Robert Nickas /ubueditions ubu.com/ubu This UbuWeb Edition edited by Lucia della Paolera 2010 2 The original edition was published by E.P. DUTTON, INC. NEW YORK For G. B. Copyright @ 1984 by the Estate of Gregory Battcock and Robert Nickas All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review written for inclusion in a magazine, newspaper or broadcast. Published in the United States by E. P. Dutton, Inc., 2 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10016 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 79-53323 ISBN: 0-525-48039-0 Published simultaneously in Canada by Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Toronto 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 First Edition Vito Acconci: "Notebook: On Activity and Performance." Reprinted from Art and Artists 6, no. 2 (May l97l), pp. 68-69, by permission of Art and Artists and the author. Russell Baker: "Observer: Seated One Day At the Cello." Reprinted from The New York Times, May 14, 1967, p. lOE, by permission of The New York Times. Copyright @ 1967 by The New York Times Company.
    [Show full text]
  • ONCURATING.Org N
    ONN CURATING.org Issue 26 / October 2015 Notes on Curating, freely distributed, non-commercial Curating Degree Zero Archive: Curatorial Research With Contributions by Felix Ensslin Sabeth Buchmann Sergio Edelzstein Elke Krasny Avi Feldman Brian Holmes Ellen Blumenstein Dorothee Richter & Barnaby Drabble (eds.) Contents 02 86 Editorial “Something that has to do with life itself” Curating Degree Zero Archive: World of Matter and the Radical Imaginary Curatorial Research Brian Holmes Dorothee Richter and Barnaby Drabble 93 08 The Curator and Her Double. The Cruelty of Curating Degree Zero Archive 2003–2008 the Avatar Ellen Blumenstein 17 The Subject of Curating – Notes on the Path 101 towards a Cultural Clinic of the Present Thinking About Curatorial Education Felix Ensslin Dorothee Richter 32 110 Curating with/in the System Imprint Sabeth Buchmann 40 Are Boycotts the New “Collective Curating?” Sergio Edelsztein 51 Feminist Thought and Curating: On Method Elke Krasny 70 Performing Justice – From Dada’s Trial to Yael Bartana’s JRMiP Congress Avi Feldman Editorial Curating Degree Zero Archive: Curatorial Research Curating Degree Zero Archive. Curatorial Research Dorothee Richter & Barnaby Drabble When we started a discourse on curating in 1998 with the conference “Curating Degree Zero,” we could not have imagined the intensity of interest in this subject in the coming years. In 2003 we wanted to re-examine the field together with Annette Schindler, but when we failed to organise enough funds, we changed the concept and concentrated on the archive, which originally should have just accompanied the symposium. This decision, half by chance and half out of a deeply felt interest in archival practices, proved to be valid, insofar that the archive grew and developed rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Modern Art Painting Sculpture Architecture Photography
    HISTORY OF MODERN ART PAINTING SCULPTURE ARCHITECTURE PHOTOGRAPHY SEVENTH EDITION LK024_P0001EDarmason_HoMA_FM_Combined.indd i 14/09/2012 15:49 LK024_P0001EDarmason_HoMA_FM_Combined.indd ii 14/09/2012 15:49 HISTORY OF MODERN ART PAINTING SCULPTURE ARCHITECTURE PHOTOGRAPHY SEVENTH EDITION H.H. ARNASON ELIZABETH C. MANSFIELD National Humanities Center Boston Columbus Indianapolis New York San Francisco Upper Saddle River Amsterdam Cape Town Dubai London Madrid Milan Munich Paris Montréal Toronto Delhi Mexico City São Paulo Sydney Hong Kong Seoul Singapore Taipei Tokyo LK024_P0001EDarmason_HoMA_FM_Combined.indd iii 14/09/2012 15:49 Editorial Director: Craig Campanella This book was designed and produced by Editor-in-Chief: Sarah Touborg Laurence King Publishing Ltd, London Senior Sponsoring Editor: Helen Ronan www.laurenceking.com Editorial Assistant: Victoria Engros Production Manager: Simon Walsh Vice President, Director of Marketing: Brandy Dawson Page Design: Robin Farrow Executive Marketing Manager: Kate Mitchell Photo Researcher: Emma Brown Editorial Project Manager: David Nitti Copy Editor: Lis Ingles Production Liaison: Barbara Cappuccio Managing Editor: Melissa Feimer Senior Operations Supervisor: Mary Fischer Operations Specialist: Diane Peirano Senior Digital Media Editor: David Alick Media Project Manager: Rich Barnes Cover photo: Marcel Duchamp, Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2, 1912 (detail). Oil on canvas, 58 ϫ 35” (147.3 ϫ 88.9 cm). Philadelphia Museum of Art. page 2: Georges Seurat, A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte, 1884–86 (detail). 1 1 Oil on canvas, 6’ 9 ∕2” ϫ 10’ 1 ∕4” (2.1 ϫ 3.1 m). The Art Institute of Chicago. Credits and acknowledgments borrowed from other sources and reproduced, with permission, in this textbook appear on the appropriate page within text or in the picture credits on pages 809–16.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Historical Settings Reverse
    15 PART 1: HISTORICAL SETTINGS REVERSE ENGINEERING MODERNISM WITH THE LAST AVANT-GARDE Dieter Daniels The concept of an avantgarde, disavowed by postmodern theory, is actually more relevant today than ever before, but it has nothing to do with aesthetics. Only social situations, not artworks, qualify as avantgarde. We need access to alternative experience, not merely new ideas, for we know more about our being than we have being for what we know. Today only metadesign satisfi es the original criteria for avantgarde practice. Gene Youngblood01 THE LAST AVANT-GARDE? The case studies analyzed, documented, and contextualized in the Net Pioneers research project provide a representative cross-section of the creation of Net-based art between 1992 and 1997.02 An entire typology of these new art forms developed in just fi ve years. This astonishing dynamic emerged from the particularly intense meeting and interaction of art history and media history: a rapidly developing, international art found itself racing a fast-changing techno-sociological context. As the 1990s drew on, a new browser interface known as the World Wide Web transformed the Internet from a non-public, mostly academic and military medium (with a gray area comprised of nerds and hackers) into a 01 Gene Youngblood, “Metadesign: Towards a Postmodernism of Reconstruction,” abstract for a lecture at Ars Electronica, 1986, http://90.146.8.18/en/archives/festival_archive/festival_catalogs/ festival_artikel.asp?iProjectID=9210. All Internet references in this volume last accessed on November
    [Show full text]
  • Installation Art 1 Installation Art
    Installation art 1 Installation art Installation art describes an artistic genre of site-specific, three-dimensional works designed to transform a viewer's perception of a space. Generally, the term is applied to interior spaces, whereas exterior interventions are often called Land art; however the boundaries between these terms overlap. History Installation art can be either temporary or permanent. Installation artworks have been constructed in exhibition spaces such as museums and galleries, as well as public- and private spaces. The genre incorporates a very broad range of everyday and natural materials, which are often chosen for their evocative qualities, as well as new media such as video, sound, performance, immersive virtual reality and the internet. Many installations are site-specific in that they are designed to exist only in the space for which they were created. A number of institutions focusing on Installation art were created from the 1980s onwards, suggesting the need for Installation to be seen as a separate discipline. These included the Mattress Factory, Pittsburgh, the Museum of Installation in London, and the Fairy Doors of Ann Arbor, MI, among others. Installation art came to prominence in the 1970s but its roots can be identified in Marcel Duchamp, Fountain, 1917. earlier artists such as Marcel Duchamp and his use of the readymade and Kurt Photograph by Alfred Stieglitz Schwitters' Merz art objects, rather than more traditional craft based sculpture. The intention of the artist is paramount in much later installation art whose roots lie in the conceptual art of the 1960s. This again is a departure from traditional sculpture which places its focus on form.
    [Show full text]
  • From Margin to Center: the Spaces of Installation
    “Reiss offers a lucid argument for rethinking ‘Installation art’ and its challenge to the repressive and restrictive terms of the modernist art object. Her revisionism is a refreshing departure from the essentially formalist canon that continues to dis- tort the meaning and implications of the radical aesthetics of the 1960s.” —Maurice Berger, Senior Fellow, The Vera List focus is installations created in New Center for Art & Politics, New School for Social Reiss York City—which has a particularly Research Julie H. Reiss rich history of Installation art— Julie H. Reiss beginning in the late 1950s. She takes Margin From “Reiss’s narration of the progress of Installation From us from Allan Kaprow’s 1950s envi- art from alternative to mainstream is clear, well ronments to examples from minimal- Margin researched, and cogently argued.This book fills a ism, performance art, and process art toCenter void in the field of contemporary art history.” to establish Installation art’s autono- —Tom Finkelpearl, Program Director, P.S. 1 From The Spaces of Installation Art my as well as its relationship to other Contemporary Art Center movements. to Center Margin Recent years have seen a surge of Book and jacket design by Jean Wilcox. Unlike traditional art works, Installa- “From Margin to Center is a much-needed first his- interest in the effects of exhibition Front cover: Installation view of the exhi- tion art has no autonomous existence. tory of the development of Installation art in space, curatorial practice, and institu- bition A Sculpture by Herbert Ferber to Create It is usually created for a particular America.
    [Show full text]
  • Installation Art and Experience
    INTRODU INSTALLATION ART AND EXPERIENCE What is installation art? 'Installation art' is a term that loosely refers to the type of art into which the viewer physically enters, and which is often described as 'theatrical', 'immersive' or 'experiential'. However, the sheer diversity in terms of appearance, content and scope of the work produced today under this name, and the freedom with which the term is used, almost preclude it from having any meaning. The word 'installation' has now expanded to describe any arrangement of objects in any given space, to the point where it can happily be applied even to a conventional display of paintings on a wall. But there is a fine line between an installation of art and installation art. This ambiguity has been present since the terms first came into use in the r 960s. During this decade, the word 'installation' was employed by art magazines to describe the way in which an exhibition was arranged. The photographic documentation of this arrangement was termed an 'installation shot', and this gave rise to the use of the word for works that used the whole space as 'installation art'. Since then, the distinction between an installation of works of art and 'installation art' proper has become increasingly blurred. What both terms have in common is a desire to heighten the viewer's awareness of how objects are positioned (installed) in a space, and of our bodily response to this. However, there are also important differences. An installation of art is secondary in importance to the individual works it contains, while in a work of installation art, the space, and the ensemble of elements within it, are regarded in their entirety as a singular entity.
    [Show full text]