DOCSLIB.ORG

Anarchy and Its Viability As an Ideology Declan Burke

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anarchy and Its Viability As an Ideology Declan Burke View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by British Columbia's network of post-secondary digital repositories Langara Open Student Scholar Prize 2020 Honourable Mention A Manifestation of Total Freedom: Anarchy and its Viability as an Ideology Declan Burke Class Submitted For: POLI 1160 – Ramjee Parajulee Open Education Statement: Open education, quite simply, is the future. As human society increases in complexity, and the intellectual demands on its constituents likewise rise commensurately, there is nothing more important than access to knowledge and the means of self enrichment for the thriving of both individuals and society. As such, I consider open and decentralized scholarship to be the cornerstone of the next evolution of education. It expands the resources available to the general population to take control of their own faculties and expand their potential in ways that our present system is too rigid, inaccessible, and dogmatic to accomplish. In doing so it shifts the center of intellectual activity from static and status based institutions that are segregated from society at large, and allows knowledge and ideas to be formed within social contexts, tested by their members, and refined with a practical purpose always in view. Thus I am proud and pleased to have the chance to contribute in some small way to this critical endeavor, and hope that my contribution merits inclusion. A Manifestation of Total Freedom: Anarchism and it’s Viability as an Ideology Declan Burke Professor: Dr. Ramjee Parajullee Class: POLI 1160 Date: November 8th, 2019 1 Anarchism represents a unique challenge for ideological appraisal: often considered uto- pian and idealistic at best, and dangerous nonsense at worst, it is rarely afforded serious consid- eration as a viable ideology. However, history has shown multiple examples of anarchistic sys- tems put into place, and the core principles of individual exercising of political liberty, and devo- lution of power to the level of direct communal control have found both practical applications and increasing societal support around the world. As such, not only have the previous detractions against anarchism failed to invalidate it as a fully viable ideology, but anarchism stands unique among contemporary ideologies as a fundamental departure from the paradigm of statism that all others rest on; and thus represents a bold new course for an entirely new class of democratic po- litical theory and philosophy to develop from. In order to fully understand the merits of anarchism, we must abandon a fundamental er- ror in appraising it’s history; and in doing so reveal one of it’s principle strengths. The error be- ing that the alleged historical ‘failure’ of anarchism to maintain an effective state proves that it is a nonviable ideology. Instead, the emergence and resilience of anarchism in some of the most turbulent periods of history is proof rather of its profound adaptability. During the Mexican and Russian revolutions, anarchists would play decisive roles.1 In particular, the Ukrainian Mak- novshchina movement under Nestor Makhno would succeed in operating an autonomous anar- cho-syndicalist state, maintaining exceptionally efficient services and communications given the conditions in which it operated, while contending with both Red and White armies on their fron- tier.2 Despite Makhno’s ultimate defeat in the Russian Civil War, his followers would go on to prove a continuous thorn in the side of Soviet authorities into the mid 1920’s, organizing strikes, 1 Eric R Wolf, Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century (New York, NY: Harper &. Row Publish- ers, 1969), 22, 99. 2 ibid. 94-96. 2 radicalizing youths, and attempting to undo what they saw as a subversion of the revolution.3 Similar cases occurred throughout the Spanish civil war, with anarchist factions across the coun- try resisting calls for a hegemonic front at the cost of their principles.4 More recently, modern anarchism has manifested both theoretically and practically in numerous forms. From engage- ment with formal politics and welfare state mechanisms5, to collectives emerging as local re- sponses to war in Afghanistan and Africa,6 to intellectual challenges to the economic and politi- cal organizations of the globalized world,7 there is no doubt that anarchists have and continue to join enthusiastically in ideological contests regardless of outcome. Though while anarchism demonstrates extraordinary resilience compared to conventional ideologies, it’s break from its contemporaries rests on its complete departure from the basic structure of political thinking. Anarchism breaks from the assumptions of what is ‘required’ for effective political or- ganization by placing the individual at the centre of all political considerations. While other ideo- logies treat the individual either as a participatory element in a larger impersonal machine8, or as dangerous to the optimal functioning of human society if left unrestrained,9 anarchism contends that any separation of power from the individual devaluates that persons contribution to the polit- 3 Savchenko, Viktor. “The Anarchist Movement in Ukraine at the Height of the New Economic Policy (1924- 1925).” East/West Journal of Ukrainian Studies 4, no. 2, (2017): 174-177, 179, 184. 4 Hugh Thomas, The Spanish Civil War (Harmondsworth, UK: Pelican Books Ltd, 1986), 406. 5 Matthew S. Adams and Nathan J. Jun. “Political Theory and History: The Case of Anarchism.” Journal of Politi- cal Ideologies 20, no. 3 (2015): 245, 248; Benjamin J. Pauli, “A New Anarchism in Britain and the US: Towards a Richer Understanding of Post-War Anarchist Thought.” Journal of Political Ideologies 20, no. 2, (2015): 141-142, 144-145. 6 Jennifer Murtazashvili, “A Tired Cliché: Why We Should Stop Worrying About Ungoverned Spaces and Embrace Self-Governance.” Journal of International Affairs 71, no. 2, (2018): 13-14. 7 Benjamin Franks, “Anarchism and Business Ethics: The Social Responsibility of the Anarchist is to Destroy Busi- ness.” Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization 14, no. 4, (2014): 714-716, 720-721. 8 Lucien Van der Walt, “Back to the Future: Revival, Relevance and Route of an Anarchist/ Syndicalist Approach for Twenty-first Century Left, Labour, and National Liberation Movements.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 34, no.3, (2016): 353-354. 9 Robert Nozick, Anarchy, the State, and Utopia (New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc, 1974), 33-35. 3 ical landscape. As such, all political structures that do exist must enable the individual to exer- cise power equivalent to other members of society. As demonstrated in modern conflict zones, the most resilient form of organization remains the localized communities of individuals.10 Both historically and ideologically, anarchist societies have stressed the necessity of democratic par- ticipation and egalitarian mechanisms of control of any representative for the collective, by the collective.11 This has led to criticism that anarchism invests too much power in the individual, and that either the society will simply be dissolved by competing individuals12, or else collec- tively replace it with another, more stable framework.13 However, anarchists argue that this is impossible precisely because the break from the traditional paradigm required by anarchism is a total one.14 This relocation of the locus of power from an abstract institution to the individuals that compose society, does not however change the communal context of the individual. In fact, by recognition of the individuality of those we share society with, we become aware of our fun- damental responsibility towards the maintenance of society for the benefit of all its members.15 Peter Kropotkin similarly regarded anarchism as the rejection of community by dictation, and that the recognition of human capacity for adaptive socialization was the key to the reorientation of society through individuals recognizing their interests in each others wellbeing.16 Instead of fearing or seeking to exploit the capacities of individuals, anarchism fully embraces the capacity of self determination of the individual as the strongest foundation for social organization. This 10 Murtazashvili. 21-23. 11 Angela Wigger and Hubert Buch-Hansen, “Competition, the Global Crisis, and Alternatives to Neoliberal Capi- talism: A Critical Engagement with Anarchism.” New Political Science 35, no. 4, (2013): 624. 12 Nozick. 51-52. 13 Van der Walt. 357. 14 The Invisible Committee, The Coming Insurrection. (Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e), 2009), 16-17, 23. 15 Jean-Paul Sartre, Existentialism & Humanism. (York, UK: Methuen, 2013), 32-34. 16 Peter Kropotkin, Kropotkin’s Revolutionary Pamphlets, ed. Roger N. Baldwin (New York: Dover Publications Inc., 1970), 206, 209, 217-218. 4 further emphasizes the paradigmatic nature of the division between anarchism and other contem- porary ideologies: where representative and authoritarian societies are designed with an inherent mistrust of their constituent members, anarchists allow society to freely reflect their constituents for better and worse. This principle of people as both the basic means and ends of society is critical to under- standing and appreciating the anarchist approach to organization. It is also important to under- stand that organization, or ‘community’, takes the place of the ‘state’ used in other ideologies. Saul Alinksy, emphasizes that means and ends are only useful when directed towards an immedi- ate concern and action, and that a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Libertarian Marxism Mao-Spontex Open Marxism Popular Assembly Sovereign Citizen Movement Spontaneism Sui Iuris
    Autonomist Marxist Theory and Practice in the Current Crisis Brian Marks1 University of Arizona School of Geography and Development [email protected] Abstract Autonomist Marxism is a political tendency premised on the autonomy of the proletariat. Working class autonomy is manifested in the self-activity of the working class independent of formal organizations and representations, the multiplicity of forms that struggles take, and the role of class composition in shaping the overall balance of power in capitalist societies, not least in the relationship of class struggles to the character of capitalist crises. Class composition analysis is applied here to narrate the recent history of capitalism leading up to the current crisis, giving particular attention to China and the United States. A global wave of struggles in the mid-2000s was constituitive of the kinds of working class responses to the crisis that unfolded in 2008-10. The circulation of those struggles and resultant trends of recomposition and/or decomposition are argued to be important factors in the balance of political forces across the varied geography of the present crisis. The whirlwind of crises and the autonomist perspective The whirlwind of crises (Marks, 2010) that swept the world in 2008, financial panic upon food crisis upon energy shock upon inflationary spiral, receded temporarily only to surge forward again, leaving us in a turbulent world, full of possibility and peril. Is this the end of Neoliberalism or its retrenchment? A new 1 Published under the Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works Autonomist Marxist Theory and Practice in the Current Crisis 468 New Deal or a new Great Depression? The end of American hegemony or the rise of an “imperialism with Chinese characteristics?” Or all of those at once? This paper brings the political tendency known as autonomist Marxism (H.
    [Show full text]
  • Human-Computer Insurrection
    Human-Computer Insurrection Notes on an Anarchist HCI Os Keyes∗ Josephine Hoy∗ Margaret Drouhard∗ University of Washington University of Washington University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA Seattle, WA, USA Seattle, WA, USA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT 2019), May 4–9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. ACM, New York, NY, The HCIcommunity has worked to expand and improve our USA, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300569 consideration of the societal implications of our work and our corresponding responsibilities. Despite this increased 1 INTRODUCTION engagement, HCI continues to lack an explicitly articulated "You are ultimately—consciously or uncon- politic, which we argue re-inscribes and amplifies systemic sciously—salesmen for a delusive ballet in oppression. In this paper, we set out an explicit political vi- the ideas of democracy, equal opportunity sion of an HCI grounded in emancipatory autonomy—an an- and free enterprise among people who haven’t archist HCI, aimed at dismantling all oppressive systems by the possibility of profiting from these." [74] mandating suspicion of and a reckoning with imbalanced The last few decades have seen HCI take a turn to exam- distributions of power. We outline some of the principles ine the societal implications of our work: who is included and accountability mechanisms that constitute an anarchist [10, 68, 71, 79], what values it promotes or embodies [56, 57, HCI. We offer a potential framework for radically reorient- 129], and how we respond (or do not) to social shifts [93]. ing the field towards creating prefigurative counterpower—systems While this is politically-motivated work, HCI has tended to and spaces that exemplify the world we wish to see, as we avoid making our politics explicit [15, 89].
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus for Activism: Engagement and Resistance
    1802804 : Activism: Engagement and Resistance Syllabus Spring 2018 Login Course Syllabus Syllabus Dashboard Courses Activism: Engagement and Resistance Calendar Sunset with burning building Inbox Help Semester & Location: Spring 2018 - DIS Copenhagen Type & Credits: Elective Course - 3 credits Major Disciplines: Communication, Philosophy, Sociology. Faculty Members: Jesper Lohmann Program Director: Neringa B. Vendelbo - [email protected] Time & Place: Monday & Thursday, 14.50 - 16.10, N7 - C24 Course Description: This course offers a broad introduction to the concept of activism, focusing on the challenges and opportunities activists face in contemporary society. In the course we will be reading theoretical articles on activism as well as analyzing specific examples. Classes will rest on a combination of empirical and theoretical discussions. We will be looking at different topics of activism (Occupy Movement, Internet, Labor, Human Rights, Feminism, Environment, Global Justice) and different forms/tools of activism (Social Media, Hacktivism, Strikes, Boycotts, Demonstrations, Gate-crashing, Culture Jamming…). The variety of cases, topics and forms will help us understand how and why some forms of activism might be more efficient than others in specific contexts. Several of the cases will be from Denmark or other European countries. This focus will give us the opportunity to discuss potential differences and similarities between European and American examples of activism. In short, by looking at multiple cases, our ability to analyze specific cases will be strengthened. This broad perspective will help us decide how to create our own activist projects – in this course as well as in our future lives – that are suited for making a difference in the world we are living in today.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarcho-Surrealism in Chicago
    44 1 ANARCHO-SURREALISM IN CHICAGO SELECTED TEXTS DREAMS OF ARSON & THE ARSON OF DREAMS: 3 SURREALISM IN ‘68 Don LaCross THE PSYCHOPATHOLOGY OF WORK 19 Penelope Rosemont DISOBEDIENCE: THE ANTIDOTE FOR MISERABLISM 22 Penelope Rosemont MUTUAL ACQUIESCENCE OR MUTUAL AID? 26 Ron Sakolsky ILL WILL EDITIONS • ill-will-editions.tumblr.com 2 43 AK Press, 2010, p. 193. [22] Laurance Labadie, “On Competition” in Enemies of Society: An Anthology of Individualist and Egoist Thought (Ardent Press, San Francisco, 2011) p. 249. The underpinnings of Labadie’s point of view, which are similar to those of many other authors featured in this seminal volume, are based on the assumption that communitarian forms of mutual aid do not necessarily lead to individual emancipation. Rather, from this perspective, their actual practice involves the inherent danger of creating an even more insidious form of servitude based upon a herd mentality that crushes individuality in the name of mutuality, even when their practitioners intend or claim to respect individual freedom as an anarchist principle. [23] The Invisible Committee. The Coming Insurrection. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2009. [24] Anonymous. “Taking Communion at the End of History” in Politics is not a Banana: The Journal of Vulgar Discourse. Institute for Experimental Freedom, 2009, p. 70. [25] Anonymous. Desert. St. Kilda: Stac an Armin Press, 2011, p 7. [26] Ibid, p 68. [27] James C. Scott. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. [28] PM. Bolo Bolo. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia, 1995, pp 58–60. [29] Richard Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Anarchism and Authoritarian Populism: Towards a More (State-)Critical ‘Critical Agrarian Studies’
    The Journal of Peasant Studies ISSN: 0306-6150 (Print) 1743-9361 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fjps20 Agrarian anarchism and authoritarian populism: towards a more (state-)critical ‘critical agrarian studies’ Antonio Roman-Alcalá To cite this article: Antonio Roman-Alcalá (2020): Agrarian anarchism and authoritarian populism: towards a more (state-)critical ‘critical agrarian studies’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2020.1755840 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1755840 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 20 May 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 3209 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 4 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fjps20 THE JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1755840 FORUM ON AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM AND THE RURAL WORLD Agrarian anarchism and authoritarian populism: towards a more (state-)critical ‘critical agrarian studies’* Antonio Roman-Alcalá International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands ABSTRACT KEYWORDS This paper applies an anarchist lens to agrarian politics, seeking to Anarchism; authoritarian expand and enhance inquiry in critical agrarian studies. populism; critical agrarian Anarchism’s relevance to agrarian processes is found in three studies; state theory; social general areas: (1) explicitly anarchist movements, both historical movements; populism; United States of America; and contemporary; (2) theories that emerge from and shape these moral economy movements; and (3) implicit anarchism found in values, ethics, everyday practices, and in forms of social organization – or ‘anarchistic’ elements of human social life.
    [Show full text]
  • Diverging Roots: the Coming Insurrectionâ•Žs Situationist Lineage
    Scholarly Horizons: University of Minnesota, Morris Undergraduate Journal Volume 4 Issue 2 Article 4 July 2017 Diverging Roots: The Coming Insurrection’s Situationist Lineage Timothy Fitzgerald University of Minnesota, Morris Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/horizons Part of the Other Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Fitzgerald, Timothy (2017) "Diverging Roots: The Coming Insurrection’s Situationist Lineage," Scholarly Horizons: University of Minnesota, Morris Undergraduate Journal: Vol. 4 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/horizons/vol4/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Minnesota Morris Digital Well. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Horizons: University of Minnesota, Morris Undergraduate Journal by an authorized editor of University of Minnesota Morris Digital Well. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fitzgerald: Diverging Roots Fitzgerald 1 Tim Fitzgerald HUM 3043 Final Paper Diverging Roots: The Coming Insurrection’s Situationist Lineage Over the past 60 years, there has been a resurgence of anarchism in Western Society. The revolutionary spirit has very much returned to the consciousness of popular culture, if it ever left at all. This ‘comeback’ of anarchist ideology has become progressively louder in the past decade, with the rise of cyberterrorist/hacktivist groups such as Anonymous and Lulzsec, the proliferation of political and governmental distrust following the 2008 recession, and the vocal increase in anti-fascist, anarcho-capitalist, post-left anarchism, eco-anarchism, and insurrectionary anarchist groups and activists such as The Invisible Committee. But many of these ideas haven’t been pulled from thin-air, or ancient ideological tomes that have gone out of fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • 02955 the Aesthetics of Violence OA
    Violence and Other Unpolitical Acts in the New Cycle of Protests Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen For us, ultimately, violence is what has been taken fom us, and today we need to take it back.1 Tiqqun, Introduction to Civil War Within three decades they [the Social Democrats] managed virtually to erase the name of Blanqui, though it had been the rallying sound that had reverberated through the preceding century.2 Walter Benjamin, “Teses on the Philosophy of History” It is now becoming generally accepted that demonstrations, marches, spectacles and shows don’t lead anywhere… . Te methods of struggle therefore must be put through analysis because they present an obstacle to the creation of new modes of action.3 Jacques Camatte, “Against Domestication” 61 the aesthetics of violence Afer a 30-year long period of one-sided neoliberal counter- revolution, the last ten years have been characterized by the return of universal disgust against the political status quo. So- cial movements, assemblies, occupations, multitudes, uprisings, riots, and revolts have moved discontinuously across a world united in distrust or outright hatred toward a corrupt political class. Millions of people have taken to the streets, occupying squares, or rioting to protest the austerity and corruption of local political regimes. Most of these protests have been directed at the state, not the economy; it has been the state’s crisis manage- ment that has been the object of resentment and critique. People are disobeying and rejecting the state and its exercise of power. Te threat of a situation of “double power” forces the state to react, and in most places, from Egypt to Hong Kong to France, the state has responded aggressively.
    [Show full text]
  • Faint Signal the Student Occupations in California and the Communiqué from an Absent Future
    NEWS Faint signal The student occupations in California and the Communiqué from an Absent Future From 24 September to 2 October 2009, students from Arts in Vienna, and garnered statements of solidarity the University of California, Santa Cruz occupied and from the Greek anarchist collectives based in the blockaded the University’s graduate student commons: Exarchia district of Athens, we are still looking at a nominally in protest against the cuts in education very small movement in numerical terms. Its seemingly spending in the UC system, more generally against global scope belies its localized marginality. the entire educational machine and the meagre job At the same time, it is easy to miss turning points, prospects awaiting graduates who will be saddled or the co-implication of political concepts with even with tens of thousands of dollars of debt. It is not relatively marginal political acts. The cynical response surprising that these protests should originate in that the way the word ‘communism’ has of late re- California. The state is bankrupt, with some even emerged from the ghetto of dwindling Stalinist and speculating on it being the country’s first failed state. Trotskyite party politics is just a new gloss on anarcho- However, although the occupation movement was syndicalism doesn’t take the power of words, or our born from these circumstances, what differentiates historical-political situation, seriously enough. To get a it from the more conventional protests and rallies feel for the novelty of the way the word ‘communism’ on California’s campuses is the way it has sought to is being claimed by the occupation movement – one use this issue as a rallying cry to re-energize a more that would otherwise be considered simply anarchist radical, universal opposition to the prevailing state – it is thus worth considering, by way of contrast, the of affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Invisible Committee
    To Our Friends THE INVISIBLE COMMITTEE ILL WILL EDITIONS till-will-editions.tumblr.com We would have liked to be brief. To forgo genealogies, etymologies, quotations. That a poem, a song, would suffice. We wished it would be enough to write “revolution” on a wall for the street to catch fire. But it was necessary to untangle the skein of the present, and in places to settle ac- counts with ancient falsehoods. It was necessary to try and digest seven years of historical convulsions. And decipher a world in which confusion has blossomed on a tree of misunderstanding. We’ve taken the time to write with the hope that others would take the time to read. Writing is a vanity, unless it’s for the friend. Including the friend one doesn’t know yet. In the coming years, we’ll be wherever the fires are lit. During the periods of respite, we’re not that hard to find. We’ll continue the effort of clarification we’ve begun here. There will be dates and places where we can mass our forces against logical targets. There will be dates and places for meeting up and debating. We don’t know if the insurrection will have the look of a heroic assault, or if it will be a planetary fit of crying, a sudden expression of feeling after decades of anesthe- sia, misery, and stupidity. Nothing guarantees that the fascist option wont be preferred to revolution. We’ll do what there is to be done. Thinking, attacking, building—such is our fabulous agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Invisible Committee
    Spread Anarchy, Live Communism the invisible committee 1 “Spread Anarchy, Live Communism” was a public talk delivered during ‘Te An- archist Turn’, a conference that took place at the New School for Social Research in New York on May 5–6, 2011. An audio recording is available here: http://anar- chist-developments.org/index.php/adcs_journal/issue/view/2/showToc Te proceedings of the conference were subsequently published in the 2013 book of the same name, edited by Jacob Blumenfeld, Chiara Bottici and Simon Critchley. We have ripped the text from the printed edition, making minor corrections and edits for readability. All footnotes are also ours. Te text bears the mark of its moment in time (2011). For a deeper and more precise exploration of the themes here, the reader is referred to the recently published book To O ur Friends, which will appear in English later this month. Nonetheless, having read both, we continue to fnd aspects of this earlier text useful. Hence we see a sense in circulating it. -Ill Will Editions, April 2015 ill-will-editions.tumblr.com [email protected] 2 Spread Anarchy, Live Communism The Invisible Committee There is a confrontation underlying this world. There is no need to be in Misrata today to perceive it. The streets of New York, for instance, reveal the extent to which this confrontation has been refined, for here we find all the sophisticated apparatuses needed to contain what is always threatening. Here is the mute vi- olence that crushes down what still lives under the blocks of concrete and fake smiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    LA REVUE EN SCIENCES INFIRMIÈRES • THE NURSING JOURNAL Vol.1,21 Numéro13 1/Vol.1,1 Issue 1. ISSN:13 1918-13451 P Sommaire/Content 6 15 26 36 46 69 46 69 2636 615 ARTICLE 1 E BEAUNOYER, V DESGROSEILLIERS, N VONARX & B ROY PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS OF UNDERSTANDING COMMUNITY HEALTH THROUGH VITALISM IN CANADIAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ARTICLE 2 KM SMITH & T FOTH TOMORROW IS CANCELLED: RETHINKING NURSING RESISTANCE AS INSURRECTION 2021: Vol.13, Numéro 1/Vol.13, Issue 1 1/Vol.13, Numéro Vol.13, 2021: ARTICLE 3 T GOODYEAR (RE)POLITICIZING HARM REDUCTION: POSTSTRUCTURALIST THINKING TO CHALLENGE THE MEDICALIZATION OF HARMS AMONG PEOPLE WHO USE DRUGS ARTICLE 4 Éditorial/Editorial J AVANTHAY STRUS & V POLOMENO CONSENSUAL NON-MONOGAMOUS PARENTING COUPLES’ PERCEPTIONS OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS DURING THE TRANSITION TO PARENTHOOD ARTICLE 5 C FRENOPOULO UNDERLYING PREMISES IN MEDICAL MISSION TRIPS FOR MADIHA (KULINA) INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN THE BRAZILIAN AMAZON ARTICLE 6 H POLIQUIN SIGNIFICATIONS ET REPRÉSENTATIONS DU PRENDRE SOIN DE SOI À LA CONFLUENCE DE L’INTERSUBJECTIVITÉ, DES TECHNIQUES DE SOI ET DE LA GOUVERNEMENTALITÉ DES VIVANTS Éditorial/Editorial To the Editor: We read with great interest the important paper on “Nursing Voices during COVID-19: An Analysis of Canadian Media Coverage”[1] and commend the authors for undertaking this study. It’s an important addition to our understanding of nurses’ voices in news media. As the lead researchers on the Woodhull Revisited Project, we want to share a correction and some additional thoughts. First, the 2017 replication of the 1997 Woodhull Study of Nurses and the Media did not fi nd that nurses’ representation as sources in health news stories decreased.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft, Please Do Not Cite. 1 Civilization and the State—Scott Vs. Kropotkin
    Draft, please do not cite. 1 Civilization and the State—Scott vs. Kropotkin Steven Williamson (WPSA 2018) This paper aims to put the work of James Scott in dialogue with Peter Kropotkin in the hope of teasing out the relationship between civilization and the state. Scott is not generally thought of as a political theorist, though he is well known by some social scientists. Recently however, Scott has begun to write about anarchism.1 He also has a long-standing interest in the perspective of the weakest members of society—people often overlooked, he argues, in mainstream social science scholarship.2 His more recent work applies an anarchist “squint” to various forms of state domination and what he describes as local, vernacular knowledge, or mētis.3 In one of these works, The Art of Not Being Governed, he argues that states present themselves as the bearers of civilization, and non-compliant people sometimes intentionally reject the trappings of civilization in order to avoid the state. In his most recent work Scott asserts that he equates civilization with the state “tongue in cheek”, but in doing so he suggests an underlying connection between the state and civilization. Scott's anarchist viewpoint is therefore inherently suspicious of claims about civilization.4 Though Scott's ironic tone suggests either that the state's claim to be the bearer of civilization is problematic, his insistence on drawing the connection suggests a deep symbiosis between the two concepts. Meanwhile, Kropotkin provides a useful counterpoint to Scott's treatment of civilization, as Kropotkin suggests that the state's relationship to civilization is partly 1 Scott, Two Cheers for Anarchism; Scott, The Art of Not Being Governed; Scott, Against the Grain.
    [Show full text]