Washington Mutual Tower Seattle Washington
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Different Kind of Gentrification: Seattle and Its Relationship with Industrial Land
A Different Kind of Gentrification: Seattle and its Relationship with Industrial Land David Tomporowski A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Urban Planning University of Washington 2019 Committee: Edward McCormack Christine Bae Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Department of Urban Design and Planning College of Built Environments ©Copyright 2019 David Tomporowski University of Washington Abstract A Different Kind of Gentrification: Seattle and its Relationship with Industrial Land David Tomporowski Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Edward McCormack Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering / Department of Urban Design and Planning Industry in Seattle often talks about how they are facing their own kind of gentrification. Rising property values, encroaching pressure for different land uses, and choking transportation all loom as reasons for industrial businesses to relocate out of the city. This research explores this phenomenon of industrial gentrification through a case study of Seattle’s most prominent industrial area: the SODO (“South Of Downtown”) neighborhood. My primary research question asks what the perception and reality of the state of industrial land designation and industrial land use gentrification in Seattle is. Secondary research questions involve asking how industrial land designation and industrial land use can be defined in Seattle, what percentage of land is zoned industrial in the SODO neighborhood, and what percentage of the land use is considered industrial in the SODO neighborhood. Finally, subsequent effects on freight transportation and goods movement will be considered. By surveying actual industrial land use compared to i industrially-zoned land, one can conclude whether industry’s complaints are accurate and whether attempts to protect industrial land uses are working. -
Major Offices, Including T- Mobile’S Headquarters Within the Newport Corporate Center, Due to Its Easy Access Along the I-90 Corridor
Commercial Revalue 2018 Assessment roll OFFICE AREA 280 King County, Department of Assessments Seattle, Washington John Wilson, Assessor Department of Assessments King County Administration Bldg. John Wilson 500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS-0708 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 Assessor (206)263-2300 FAX(206)296-0595 Email: [email protected] http://www.kingcounty.gov/assessor/ Dear Property Owners, Our field appraisers work hard throughout the year to visit properties in neighborhoods across King County. As a result, new commercial and residential valuation notices are mailed as values are completed. We value your property at its “true and fair value” reflecting its highest and best use as prescribed by state law (RCW 84.40.030; WAC 458-07-030). We continue to work hard to implement your feedback and ensure we provide accurate and timely information to you. We have made significant improvements to our website and online tools to make interacting with us easier. The following report summarizes the results of the assessments for your area along with a map. Additionally, I have provided a brief tutorial of our property assessment process. It is meant to provide you with background information about the process we use and our basis for the assessments in your area. Fairness, accuracy and transparency set the foundation for effective and accountable government. I am pleased to continue to incorporate your input as we make ongoing improvements to serve you. Our goal is to ensure every single taxpayer is treated fairly and equitably. Our office is here to serve you. Please don’t hesitate to contact us if you ever have any questions, comments or concerns about the property assessment process and how it relates to your property. -
1411 4Th Ave Seattle, WA 98101 Igniting Innovation and Imagination in the Heart of Seattle’S CBD
1411 4th Ave Seattle, WA 98101 Igniting Innovation and Imagination in the Heart of Seattle’s CBD Our historical location at 1411 4th Ave spans eleven floors of flexible office space in the heart of downtown Seattle. Close proximity to bus lines, the University Street Station light rail, and Pier 50 ferry terminal make getting here, and anywhere else in the city, easy. Some of Seattle’s best restaurants, cafés, bars, and attractions are within walking distance of the office, making your work day that much better. Whether you’re juicy burger or juice bar, happy hour or 5-star cuisine, in need of a single desk or an entire suite, you’ll find a progressive, welcoming community here that supports who you are and where you’re going. Examples of WeWork spaces 1411 4th Ave | 2 1411 4th Ave | 3 Where Historic Beauty Meets Modern Workspace The arresting art deco façade of this historic 1929 landmark building gives way to light-filled, modern workspace that welcomes members from across industries. Comprised of unique visual elements and curated art, our workplace is designed to capture the innovative, industrious spirit that is ingrained in the building. Amenities include a meditation room, a new mothers’/wellness room, unlimited micro-roasted coffee, and premium conference rooms and lounges that cultivate a collaborative, supportive community. Bike storage and showers onsite make bike commutes and midday workouts easier. And our dog-friendly policy means your four-legged muse can come to work every day. Whether you’re flying solo and need a single desk or have a large team and need a suite, you’ll find space here that motivates you to push harder and inspires you to go further. -
Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant 1930-31; Addition, 1947
Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant 1930-31; Addition, 1947 1120 John Street 1986200525 see attached page D.T. Denny’s 5th Add. 110 7-12 Onni Group Vacant 300 - 550 Robson Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 2B7 The Blethen Corporation (C. B. Blethen) (The Seattle Times) Printing plant and offices Robert C. Reamer (Metropolitan Building Corporation) , William F. Fey, (Metro- politan Building Corporation) Teufel & Carlson Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant Landmark Nomination, October 2014 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 7 THROUGH 12 IN BLOCK 110, D.T. DENNY’S FIFTH ADDITION TO NORTH SEAT- TLE, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 202, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; AND TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DONATION CLAIM OF D.T. DENNY AND LOUIS DENNY, HIS WIFE, AND GOVERNMENT LOT 7 IN THE SOUTH- EAST CORNER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 25, RANGE 4 EAST, W. M., LYING WEST- ERLY OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH, AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 204496, AS PROVIDE BY ORDINANCE NO. 51975, AND DESCRIBED AS THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHERLY OF THOMAS STREET AS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2103211, NORTHERLY OF JOHN STREET, AND EASTERLY OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 110; AND TOGETHER WITH THE VACATED ALLEY IN BLOCK 110 OF SAID PLAT OF D.T. DENNY’S FIFTH ADDITION, VACATED UNDER SEATTLE ORDINANCE NO. 89750; SITUATED IN CITY OF SEATTLE, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Evan Lewis, ONNI GROUP 300 - 550 Robson Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 2B7 T: (604) 602-7711, [email protected] Seattle Times Building Complex-Printing Plant Landmark Nomination Report 1120 John Street, Seattle, WA October 2014 Prepared by: The Johnson Partnership 1212 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-6724 206-523-1618, www.tjp.us Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant Landmark Nomination Report October 2014, page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. -
Downtown Seattle
Commercial Revalue 2015 Assessment Roll AREA 30 King County, Department of Assessments Seattle, Wa. Lloyd Hara, Assessor Department of Assessments Accounting Division Lloyd Hara 500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS-0740 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 Assessor (206) 205-0444 FAX (206) 296-0106 Email: [email protected] http://www.kingcounty.gov/assessor/ Dear Property Owners: Property assessments for the 2015 assessment year are being completed by my staff throughout the year and change of value notices are being mailed as neighborhoods are completed. We value property at fee simple, reflecting property at its highest and best use and following the requirement of RCW 84.40.030 to appraise property at true and fair value. We have worked hard to implement your suggestions to place more information in an e-Environment to meet your needs for timely and accurate information. The following report summarizes the results of the 2015 assessment for this area. (See map within report). It is meant to provide you with helpful background information about the process used and basis for property assessments in your area. Fair and uniform assessments set the foundation for effective government and I am pleased that we are able to make continuous and ongoing improvements to serve you. Please feel welcome to call my staff if you have questions about the property assessment process and how it relates to your property. Sincerely, Lloyd Hara Assessor Area 30 Map The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. -
Gotham Investors, Et Al. V. Safeco Corporation, Et Al. 08-CV-00940
2 FiLEV . 08-CV-00940-NTC AODGED ENTERED 3 _^ C 1VfD 4 5 UN :.. f. 2006 6 c]ARKus o^ ^qjYc 7 STERN D SrRJCT OF WASHIN'TO . 8 DEFPur, 9 I0 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 15 AT SEATTLE 16 17 18 GOTHAM INVESTORS, on behalf of itself and >o CQ8-0940 15+' 19 all others similarly situated, 20 NOTICE OF REMOVAL 21 Plaintiff, 22 231 V. 24 25 PAULA ROSPUT REYNOLDS, JOSEPH W. 26 BROWN, ROBERT S. CLINE, PETER L.S. 27 CURRIE, JOSHUA GREEN III, JOHN S. 28 HAMLIN, KERRY KILLINGER, GARY 29 LOCKE, GERARDO 1. LOPEZ, WILLIAM G. 30 REED, CHARLES R. RINEHART. JUDITH M_ 31 RUNSTAD, SAFECO CORPORATION, and 1 32 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE v 33 COMPANY, 34 35 Defendants. 36 37 38 a9 TO, The Clerk, United States District Court U`5 40 for the Western District of Washington at Seattle 41 42 A. Removal of State Court Action 43 44 Defendants Paula Rosput Reynolds, Joseph W. Brown, Robert S. Cline, Peter L_S. Currie, 45 46 Joshua Green Ill, John S. Harnlin, Kerry Killinger, Gary Locke, Gerardo 1. Lopez, William G. 47 48 Reed. Charles R. Rinehart , Judith M. Runstad (collectively, the "Director Defendants "), Safeco 49 50 Corporation ("Safeco") and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ("Liberty Mutual ") are all of the 51 Perkins Coie LL NOTICE OF REMOVAL - 1' 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800 Case No. C08- Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Phone: 206.359.8000 ORIGINAL Fax: 206.359.9000 6351]-]006/LEGAL14177038 1 defendants in the above-entitled civil action, which was commenced on or about June 2, 2008, and is still pending in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County (the "Superior Court"), as Cause No. -
Seattle Commercial Core Neighborhood Plan Land Use and Urban Design Summary
Seattle Commercial Core Neighborhood Plan Land Use and Urban Design Summary February 1999 Seattle Commercial Core Neighborhood Plan Presentation Summary Prepared by Commercial Core MAKERS architecture Planning Committee and urban design Kate Joncas, Co-Chair Gerald Hansmire, Jerry Ernst, Co-Chair Lead Consultant Nancy Bagley Catherine Maggio, Jean Bateman Project Manager Brad Bigelow Dave Boyd Jill Curtis Stefani Wildhaber Barbra Edl Nakano Dennis Tom Gerlach Landscape Architects Mark Hewitt Kenichi Nakano Bob Hinckley Theresa Neylon Paul Kalanick Paul Lambros Ravenhurst Development Lois Laughlin Corporation Karin Link Darrel Vange Ed Marquand Jan O’Conner Adrienne Quinn Ray Serebrin Greg Smith Jan Stimach Catherine Stanford Bernie Walter Sponsored by Xy of Seattle City of Seattle Neighborhood Planning Office Strategic Planning Office John Eskelin Dennis Meier Robert Scully Contents Vision ................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose and Context ........................................................................................ 3 Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan ................................................................................................... 3 Downtown Urban Center Plan .................................................................................................... 3 Commercial Core Neighborhood Plan ........................................................................................ 4 Goals and Policies ........................................................................................... -
96179-4 Petition for Review
FILED SUPREME COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON 81912018 2:52 PM BY SUSAN L. CARLSON CLERK No. 96179-4 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MONTLAKE LLC, a Washington limited liability company; STELTER MONTLAKE LLC, a Washington limited liability company; BTF ENTERPRISES, INC., a Washington corporation; T-MOBILE USA, and the Montlake Community Club Appellants. Petition for Review MOTION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW P. Stephen DiJulio, WSBA No. 7139 Eric B. Wolff, WSBA No. 43047 [email protected] [email protected] Andrea L. Bradford, WSBA No. 45748 R. Gerard Lutz, WSBA No. 17692 [email protected] [email protected] FOSTER PEPPER PLLC PERKINS COIE LLP 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3000 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3292 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.447.4400 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Attorneys for BTF Enterprises, Inc. Attorneys for Montlake LLC and Stelter Montlake LLC Kinnon W. Williams, WSBA No. 16201 [email protected] INSLEE, BEST, DOEZIE & RYDER, PS 10900 NE 4th Street Bellevue, WA 98004 Telephone: 425.455.1234 Attorney for T-Mobile TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 1 II. IDENTITY OF PETITIONERS .................................................... 3 III. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION .............................................. 3 IV. ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ......................................... 4 V. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ...................................................... 4 VI. ARGUMENT ............................................................................... 10 A. The Court of Appeals’ broad holding that SEPA does not apply to this case is legally incorrect and in conflict with Division II’s decision in Boss, Chapter 197-11 WAC, and this Court’s decision in Brannan ....... 10 B. The Court of Appeals failed to consider WSDOT’s disregard of its own policies as evidence of arbitrary and capricious conduct .................................................... -
United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form
Use these links to rapidly review the document TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Table of Contents As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 19, 2020. Registration No. 333- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ACCOLADE, INC. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 7389 01-0969591 (State or other jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or Classification Code Number) Identification Number) organization) 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 926-8100 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices) Rajeev Singh Chief Executive Officer Accolade, Inc. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 926-8100 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) Copies to: Richard Eskew Christopher J. Austin John W. Robertson General Counsel James M. Shea, Jr. Alan D. Hambelton 660 West Germantown Pike, Paul Hastings LLP Cooley LLP Suite 500 200 Park Avenue 1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1900 Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 New York, NY 10166 Seattle, WA 98101 (610) 834-2989 (212) 318-6000 (206) 452-8700 Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement is declared effective. If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. -
20000 SF+ Non-Residential Multifamily Buildings
Seattle Energy Benchmarking Ordinance | 20,000 SF+ Non‐Residential Multifamily Buildings ‐ Required to Report Dec 2015 Data IMPORTANT: This list may not indicate all buildings on a parcel and/or all buildings subject to the ordinance. Building types subject to the ordinance as defined in the Director's Rule need to report, regardless of whether or not they are listed below. The Building Name, Building Address and Gross Floor Area were derived from King County Assessor records and may differ from the actual building. Please confirm the building information prior to benchmarking and email corrections to: [email protected]. SEATTLE GROSS FLOOR BUILDING NAME BUILDING ADDRESS BUILDING ID AREA (SF) 1MAYFLOWER PARK HOTEL 405 OLIVE WAY, SEATTLE, WA 98101 88,434 2 PARAMOUNT HOTEL 724 PINE ST, SEATTLE, WA 98101 103,566 3WESTIN HOTEL 1900 5TH AVE, SEATTLE, WA 98101 961,990 5HOTEL MAX 620 STEWART ST, SEATTLE, WA 98101 61,320 8WARWICK SEATTLE HOTEL 401 LENORA ST, SEATTLE, WA 98121 119,890 9WEST PRECINCT (SEATTLE POLICE) 810 VIRGINIA ST, SEATTLE, WA 98101 97,288 10 CAMLIN WORLDMARK HOTEL 1619 9TH AVE, SEATTLE, WA 98101 83,008 11 PARAMOUNT THEATER 901 PINE ST, SEATTLE, WA 98101 102,761 12 COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT ‐ ALASKA 612 2ND AVE, SEATTLE, WA 98104 163,984 13 LYON BUILDING 607 3RD AVE, SEATTLE, WA 98104 63,712 15 HOTEL MONACO 1101 4TH AVE, SEATTLE, WA 98101 153,163 16 W SEATTLE HOTEL 1112 4TH AVE, SEATTLE, WA 98101 333,176 17 EXECUTIVE PACIFIC PLAZA 400 SPRING ST, SEATTLE, WA 98104 65,009 18 CROWNE PLAZA 1113 6TH AVE, SEATTLE, WA 98101 -
1998 Seattle NATCA Convention Complete Transcript
*************************************** * * * * * * * * * NATCA * * * * * * 7TH BIENNIAL CONVENTION * * * * * * SEATTLE, WASHINGTON * * * * * * SEPTEMBER 5-8 * * * * * * 1998 * * * * * * * * * *************************************** A COURT REPORTING SERVICE CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS 1620 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER 999 THIRD AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 FAX (206) 389-9329 PHONE(206) 624-0316 [email protected] REPORTED BY: PAUL J. FREDERICKSON, CCR, RPR SEPTEMBER 5, 1998 [9:25 a.m.] PRESIDENT McNALLY: Okay. If everybody will take their seats, please. The Seventh Biennial Convention of the National Air Traffic Controllers Association will come to order. I would like to welcome everybody here in Seattle. Welcome. [Applause.] PRESIDENT McNALLY: If I can, I would like to do just a few brief introductions, and then we have some speakers. Hopefully the time will work. What I would like to do is take the opportunity to introduce members of your executive board at this time. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to go alphabetical by last name, not by region. I would like to introduce to you Mike Blake, New England Vice President, Regional Vice President. [Applause.] PRESIDENT McNALLY: And of course the nickname for Mike these days is the "Northeastern Region Rep." I would like to introduce Eastern Region Vice President, Joe Fruscella. [Applause.] PRESIDENT McNALLY: And, of course, the nickname for him is the "Southern New England Region Rep" these days. Those are jokes here, guys. [Laughter.] PRESIDENT McNALLY: Okay. The next introduction is James Ferguson, Northwest Mountain Regional Vice President. [Applause.] PRESIDENT McNALLY: And he's known for "Stay out of my backyard." Okay. We have Gus Guerra, Western Pacific Regional Vice President. -
The Court Will, If Necessary, Issue a Case Sc
La Cocina de Oaxaca LLC v. Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota Doc. 44 Case 2:20-cv-01176-BJR Document 44 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 11 1 THE HONORABLE BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 4 5 WADE K. MARLER, DDS, et al., NO. 2:20-cv-00616-BJR 6 Plaintiffs, 7 v. 8 ASPEN AMERICAN INSURANCE 9 COMPANY, 10 Defendant. 11 12 KARA MCCULLOCH DMD MSD PLLC, et NO. 2:20-cv-00809-BJR al., 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE 16 COMPANY, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 CABALLERO, NO. 2: 20-cv-05437-BJR 20 Plaintiff, 21 v. 22 MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY, 23 Defendant. 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR CLASS KEL LER ROHRBACK L.L .P. CERTIFICATION (Case Nos. 2:20-cv-00616-BJR; 2:20-cv-00809- 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98101-3052 BJR; 2:20-cv-05437-BJR; 2:20-cv-00627-BJR; 2:20-cv-00620-BJR; TELEPHONE: (206) 623-1900 2:20-cv-00597-BJR; 2:20-cv-01176-BJR; 2:20-cv-0661-BJR) - 1 FACSIMILE: (206) 623-3384 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-01176-BJR Document 44 Filed 01/07/21 Page 2 of 11 1 CHORAK, et al., NO. 2:20-CV-00627-BJR 2 Plaintiffs, 3 v. 4 HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE 5 COMPANY, et al., 6 Defendants. 7 8 PACIFIC ENDODONTICS, P.C., et al, NO. 2:20-CV-00620-BJR 9 Plaintiffs, 10 v.