DOCSLIB.ORG

A Different Kind of Gentrification: Seattle and Its Relationship with Industrial Land

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Different Kind of Gentrification: Seattle and Its Relationship with Industrial Land A Different Kind of Gentrification: Seattle and its Relationship with Industrial Land David Tomporowski A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Urban Planning University of Washington 2019 Committee: Edward McCormack Christine Bae Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Department of Urban Design and Planning College of Built Environments ©Copyright 2019 David Tomporowski University of Washington Abstract A Different Kind of Gentrification: Seattle and its Relationship with Industrial Land David Tomporowski Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Edward McCormack Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering / Department of Urban Design and Planning Industry in Seattle often talks about how they are facing their own kind of gentrification. Rising property values, encroaching pressure for different land uses, and choking transportation all loom as reasons for industrial businesses to relocate out of the city. This research explores this phenomenon of industrial gentrification through a case study of Seattle’s most prominent industrial area: the SODO (“South Of Downtown”) neighborhood. My primary research question asks what the perception and reality of the state of industrial land designation and industrial land use gentrification in Seattle is. Secondary research questions involve asking how industrial land designation and industrial land use can be defined in Seattle, what percentage of land is zoned industrial in the SODO neighborhood, and what percentage of the land use is considered industrial in the SODO neighborhood. Finally, subsequent effects on freight transportation and goods movement will be considered. By surveying actual industrial land use compared to i industrially-zoned land, one can conclude whether industry’s complaints are accurate and whether attempts to protect industrial land uses are working. Literature details cases that encapsulate the industrial gentrification debate and Seattle has undertaken many studies of its industrial land. Methods involve a case study approach coupled with a field survey. The survey area chosen is the SODO neighborhood, which is part of the locally and regionally-designated Duwamish Manufacturing/Industrial Center. Industrial designation is defined as any of the four types of industrial zoning in the City of Seattle. Industrial land use is defined with the help of the Land Based Classification Standards’ Function dimension, with the following subcategories considered industrial: manufacturing, warehouse, storage yard, marine terminal, railroad, and utility. Results show that over 99% of the study area is designated industrial. After classification of each parcel in the study area, 62% of the study area’s parcels, or 85% of the land area, contain actual industrial land use. When land intensive uses such as marine terminals and railroads are removed from consideration, the percent of industrial land area is only 42%. The conclusion of this study shows that 1) the narrative of industrial gentrification in Seattle is not as universal as initially perceived, 2) being designated as industrial land by zoning is not a surefire way to achieve what some would consider actual industrial land use, 3) actions undertaken by the City in the 2000s—namely increasing the size limits on non-industrial land uses in industrial zoning—have been effective at keeping SODO industrial, and 4) the question of whether Seattle is losing industry and industrial land rests on how one defines and perceives those terms. While much of SODO’s land area is still industrial, market forces and trends are drawing more non- traditional land uses to SODO, such as boutique manufacturing, breweries and distilleries, event venues, and commercial offices and retail stores. Examples are prominent and give the perception of industrial loss even if, technically, much of SODO is still designated industrial. ii Acknowledgements Thank you to my committee members, Professors Ed McCormack and Christine Bae, for your guidance and support. Thank you to Professor Anne Goodchild for your faith in me by hiring me as a research assistant and letting me be a part of the SCTL Center, and for your advice and mentorship. Thank you to Barb Ivanov, Bill Keough, and the rest of the SCTL staff for your professionalism and encouragement. Thank you to my fellow SCTL RAs; you are all brilliant in your fields and some of the hardest workers I’ve ever seen. You all will make excellent PhDs, and it was my pleasure to work with you. Thank you to Branden Born and Katya Kolesova for your critical help and guidance with forming my thesis proposal during URBDP 512. Katya, you were the most helpful TA I’ve ever had. Thank you to Diana Siembor in the Department of Urban Design and Planning for your unwavering and dedicated advice and guidance, starting all the way back in November 2014. Thank you to my fellow MUPs, whose professionalism and camaraderie made getting my master’s degree a wonderful experience. You have become my friends in a new city. Thank you to my friends in Minnesota, who supported me during my grad school decision process and continue to support me now from afar. Thank you to my family members in Seattle, especially Julie and Colleen. You have welcomed and supported me as I established myself in a new city. Finally, thank you to my partner Amber and my parents, Tom and Alyce. Quite simply, you three saved me, and I would not be here today without each of you. iii Table of Contents 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Specific Cases .................................................................................................................................3 Purpose, Research Questions, and Importance ...............................................................................5 2: Literature Review .............................................................................................................. 7 History of SODO .............................................................................................................................8 Regional and Local Industrial Land Planning and Study Efforts ....................................................... 12 City of Seattle 2007-2009 Work on Industrial Lands .......................................................................................... 14 City of Seattle 2013 Duwamish M/IC Policy and Land Use Study ...................................................................... 18 PSRC’s 2013 Regional Centers Monitoring Report Profile on the Duwamish M/IC ........................................... 23 Manufacturing Industrial Council Land Use Map ............................................................................................... 27 PSRC’s 2015 Industrial Lands Analysis ................................................................................................................ 29 City of Seattle’s 2015 Duwamish Industrial Lands Study ................................................................................... 32 City of Seattle Industrial Zoning Code ........................................................................................... 34 Land Use Classification ................................................................................................................. 40 Activity Dimension ............................................................................................................................................. 40 Function Dimension ........................................................................................................................................... 42 Structure Dimension .......................................................................................................................................... 44 Site Dimension ................................................................................................................................................... 45 Ownership Dimension ........................................................................................................................................ 46 LBCS Usability ..................................................................................................................................................... 46 Implications for Transportation and Goods Movement ................................................................. 47 3: Methods .......................................................................................................................... 49 iv Study Area ...................................................................................................................................49 Defining “Industrial” .................................................................................................................... 58 Defining Industrial Land Designation ................................................................................................................. 58 Defining Actual Industrial Land Use ................................................................................................................... 62 Classification Process ................................................................................................................... 71 4: Results ............................................................................................................................. 74 Land Use Categories ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Game Changer: Centurylink Field Case Study
    CASE STUDY CENTURYLINK FIELD, HOME OF THE SEATTLE SEAHAWKS AND SOUNDERS FC VENUE STATS Location: Seattle, Washington Opened: July 29, 2002 Seating Capacity: 67,000 Owner: Washington State Public Stadium Authority Operator: First & Goal Inc. (FGI) Venue Uses: NFL games; MLS games; NCAA football and international soccer games; Supercross and a variety of community events Construction Cost: $430 million ($566 in 2012 dollars) CENTURYLINK Field’S GREENING STORY: and Event Center. The Kingdome was demolished in 2000 to MOTIVATIONS, CHALLENGES AND LESSONS make way for the new stadium; 97 percent of the concrete was recycled locally, with 35 percent of it reused in the new FROM THE FIELD facility. Thanks to the widespread public and professional interest in “During 2005–2006 many venues and professional teams sustainability in the Northwest, environmental stewardship began the discussion on recycling and composting,” notes was built into CenturyLink Field even before the first U.S. Benge. In 2005 the Seahawks also partnered with Seattle City sports greening programs were established. Back in 2000, Light and Western Washington University to recognize local 35 percent of the concrete from the Kingdome was recycled commitments to renewable energy with a Power Players onsite to construct Seahawks Stadium (which has since been award. “It was an opportunity to highlight and learn from renamed “CenturyLink Field”). different smart energy programs,” Benge says. To this day, CenturyLink Field, the Seattle Seahawks In 2006 FGI launched CenturyLink Field’s recycling and Seattle Sounders FC are leaders in professional sports program with the installation of 75 new recycling bins greening, as founding members of the Green Sports Alliance, around the venue, fan and staff recycling education, and a and business leaders in sustainability, with an onsite new dedicated Recycling Sorting Area created to track and solar array, an aggressive recycling program and a strong separate 17 different recyclable materials.
    [Show full text]
  • (LI). Intent. It Is the Intent of the Limited Industrial District to Provide Areas For
    613. Limited Industrial District (LI). Intent. It is the intent of the Limited Industrial District to provide areas for limited industrial purposes which are not significantly objectionable in terms of noise, odor, fumes, etc., to surrounding properties. The regulations which apply within this District are designed to encourage the formation and continuance of a compatible environment for uses generally classified to be light industrial in nature; protect and reserve undeveloped areas in Georgetown County which are suitable for such industries; and discourage encroachment by those residential, commercial or other uses capable of adversely affecting the basic industrial character of the District. 613.1 Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted in any Limited Industrial District: 613.101 Research or experimental laboratory; 613.102 Transportation terminal facilities, such as deep or shallow water ports or airfields together with incidental operations, but excluding truck terminals; 613.103 Public utility installation; 613.104 Agricultural farm; 613.105 Horticultural nursery; 613.106 Radio and/or television station and/or transmission tower, except within restricted areas delineated in the Georgetown County Airport Master Plan; 613.107 Office building and/or office for governmental, business, professional or general purpose; 613.108 Commercial trade or vocational school; 613.109 Off-street commercial parking or storage area for customer, client or employee owned vehicles; 613.110 Lumber processing and sales; 613.111 Public buildings,
    [Show full text]
  • Parks Contain and Parking and Recreation Areas
    << Chapter >> Home | TOC | Index Courtesy DeRevere and Associates The distribution and training center for Konica Business Machines in Huntington Beach, California. such as building entrances, outdoor gathering spots, • Industrial Park—Modern industrial parks contain and parking and recreation areas. large-scale manufacturing and warehouse facilities • On-site Amenities and Services—Expectations for and a limited amount of or no office space.1 on-site amenities and services for employees have • Warehouse/Distribution Park—Warehouse and dis- become higher. In addition to contributing to a more tribution parks contain large, often low-rise storage interesting and desirable working environment, ameni- facilities with provisions for truck loading and parking. ties can help distinguish a project in a competitive A small proportion of office space may be included, market. either as finished space built into the storage areas or • Flexible Building Design—Each building type found housed in separate office structures. Landscaping and at business parks has distinctive building requirements, parking areas are included, but because of the rela- but all require functionality and flexibility to meet tively low ratios of employees to building area, a wide changing market conditions and occupiers’ needs. mix of on-site amenities for employees is not available. Flexible building design starts with basic considera- • Logistics Park—Known as commerce parks in the tions such as the size and depth of floorplates and United Kingdom and Gewerbeparks in Germany, such moves into advanced technical systems that help business parks focus on the value-added services of make a building “smart.” logistics and processing rather than warehousing and • Appropriate Parking—Parking ratios are increas- storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate Investing Overview
    Real Estate Investing Overview 18301 Von Karman, Suite 330, Irvine, CA 92612 Phone: 800-208-2976 Fax: 949.37.6701 [email protected] Fix and Flip Real Estate Investing Overview Getting Started Wholesaling: Wholesaling is a great way to get started if you are short on experience and/or funds. With wholesaling, your objective is to enter into purchase contracts at an attractive enough purchase price that you can assign your purchase contract to someone who is willing to pay you a premium to your contract purchase amount for the opportunity to purchase the property. Partnering: Partnering with an experienced fix/flip investor is a great way to learn the business with less risk. Your partner will likely want to share in any profits but the potential savings of avoiding snafus may be more than worth any shared profits. Fix and Flipping: The potential profits of going it alone and purchasing, repairing and reselling your own investment property are the greatest, but so are the potential risks. How to Obtain the Money to Flip Houses Do you want to start flipping houses but don’t know how you are going to access the money you need? Check out these options to find the cash to begin flipping houses: Home Equity Loan: You can utilize the equity in your primary residence to flip houses. If you don’t have enough equity in your home to purchase an investment property outright you can leverage your home equity into buying one, or more deals with a traditional or private money lender. Credit Cards: Be cautious when using this method because it’s easy to get over extended.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Stability of the Duwamish River Delta, Seattle, Washington
    Seismic Stability of the Duwamish River Delta, Seattle, Washington Professional Paper 1661-E U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Other than this note, this page left intentionally blank. Earthquake Hazards of the Pacific Northwest Coastal and Marine Regions Robert Kayen, Editor Seismic Stability of the Duwamish River Delta, Seattle, Washington By Robert E. Kayen and Walter A. Barnhardt The delta front of the Duwamish River valley near Elliott Bay and Harbor Island is founded on young Holocene deposits shaped by sea-level rise, episodic volcanism, and seismicity. These river-mouth deposits are highly susceptible to seismic soil liquefac- tion and are potentially prone to submarine landsliding and disintegrative flow failure. Professional Paper 1661-E U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ii U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 This report and any updates to it are available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1661e/ For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS — the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Manuscript approved for publication, May 29, 2007 Text edited by Peter Stauffer Layout by David R. Jones Suggested citation: Kayen, R.E., and Barnhardt, W.A., 2007, Seismic stability of the Duwamish River delta, Seattle, Washington: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Cemetery Resources
    HISTORIC CEMETERY RESOURCES Technical Paper No. 11 Historic Preservation Program, Department of Natural Resources & Parks, 20l S. Jackson Street, Suite 700, Seattle, WA 98104, 206-477-4538 | TTY Relay: 711 Introduction Cemeteries and funerary objects are often of value beyond their traditional role as personal and family memorials or religious sacramentals. They may be historically significant as landmarks, designed landscapes or as repositories of historical information relating to communities, ethnic heritage and other heritage topics. The following resources have been compiled for individuals and organizations interested in cemetery records, research and preservation. Records & Research Area genealogical societies, museums, historical societies, pioneer associations, libraries and hereditary associations often have records and publications of interest. Among the organizations with information on cemeteries are: Seattle Genealogical Society, P.O. Box 15329, Seattle WA 98115-0329 South King County Genealogical Society, P.O. Box 3174, Kent, WA 98089-0203 Eastside Genealogical Society. P.O. Box 374, Bellevue, WA 98009-0374 Seattle Public Library, 1000 Fourth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-1109 Pioneer Association of the State of Washington, 1642 43rd Avenue E., Seattle, WA 98112 Fiske Genealogical Foundation, 1644 43rd Avenue E., Seattle, WA 98112-3222 Many historical societies and museum groups around King County have been instrumental in preserving and maintaining cemeteries. The Association of King County Historical Organizations (www.akcho.org) maintains a directory of area historical museums and organizations. A directory of historical organizations can also be found on the internet at www.historylink.org A number of churches and religious organizations own and operate cemeteries and maintain records of value to cemetery research.
    [Show full text]
  • Hec Edmundson Pavilion Renovation
    Heritage Husky Logos and Marks Through the Years 1936 1937 1958 1932 1953 1959 1971 1974 TM TM 1979 1983 1995 1995 THE LOGO — In April of 2001, Washington launched a new identity program resulting in new unforms for six athletic teams, and enhanced block “W” logo, and a new secondary Husky logo, in an attempt to give the 23 athletic teams at Washington a uniform look, while maintaining the great tradition and heritage of the University of Washington Huskies. The new version of the Husky, drawn by Shelby Tiffany and Phil Long of Nike Team Sports, is a more modernistic Husky, with strong, bold features that represent character, tenacity and courage. For more information on Washington’s official marks, visit the University's licensing web site at www.huskylogos.com 2001 2001 • 2005–05 Washington Basketball • 213 Heritage The Dawghouse Bank of America Arena at Hec Edmundson Pavilion Annual Home Attendance Year Total (# of games) Average 2004 108,781 (14) 7,770 2003 101,983 (15) 6,799 2002 78,877 (12) 6,573 2001 98,149 (15) 6,543 2000 (@KeyArena) 102,058 (13) 7,851 1999 80,992 (12) 6,749 1998 74,469 (14) 5,319 1997 88,399 (15) 5,893 1996 77,171 (15) 5,148 1995 67,648 (13) 5,204 1994 47,515 (13) 3,655 1993 48,587 (16) 3,037 1992 56,812 (16) 3,551 1991 46,096 (16) 2,881 1990 50,167 (16) 3,135 1989 49,277 (14) 3,520 1988 45,875 (13) 3,529 1987 45,875 (13) 4,782 Edmundson Pavilion, as pictured in 1927, has been the host to 776 Washington basketball victories.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meaning of Place and State-Led Gentrification in Birmingham's Eastside
    Porter, E. and Barber, A. (2006) The meaning of place and state-led gentrification in Birmingham's Eastside. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 10 (2). pp. 215-234. ISSN 1360-4813 http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/25333/ Deposited on: 23 March 2010 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk The meaning of place and state-led gentrification in Birmingham's Eastside Abstract Despite Birmingham's claim to constitute 'England's second city', it has arguably been overlooked in much recent academic research - perhaps because of a tendency to regard Manchester as the paradigmatic English example of the emerging post- industrial city-region. Contributors to CITY have gone some way to redressing this imbalance - with Frank Webster's paper in vol 5 no 1 and Kevin Ward's paper in vol 7 no 2 underlining the wider issues raised by the adoption of 'urban entrepreneurialism' in Birmingham. This paper, by Libby Porter and Austin Barber, takes forward such concerns through a case study of the ongoing regeneration of an individual district of the city: Birmingham Eastside. Using the stories of two pubs, whose fortunes are permanently re-shaped by state-led development initiatives, the paper develops a critical reflection on academic and policy debates relating to gentrification and the restructuring of central districts of large cities. In particular, the authors highlight how current thinking about the regeneration of inner city districts marginalizes the socio- cultural meaning of place and the human networks that animate city places. They argue that this constrains planning possibilities and imaginations for the area's future.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical, Chemical, and Biological Aspects of the Duwamish River Estuary Jking County, Washington 1963-67
    Physical, Chemical, and Biological Aspects of the Duwamish River Estuary JKing County, Washington 1963-67 (GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1873-c {Prepared in cooperation with the \Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Physical, Chemical, and Biological Aspects of the Duwamish River Estuary King County, Washington 1963-67 By J. F. SANTOS and J. D. STONER ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1873-C Prepared in cooperation with the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 78-182395 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 40 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1207 CONTENTS Page Abstract _____________________________________ Cl Introduction __________ ___ ___ _ _________ C2 Purpose and scope of the investigation _________________ C5 Methods and equipment _ _ ____ _ _ C6 Sampling and field measurements _________________ C6 Special equipment ___ _ _ C7 Analysis _______ __ _ ___ _____ _ ___ C7 Acknowledgments ____________________________ C7 Previous investigations _________________________ C8 Hydrography ______________________________ _ C9 The Duwamish River basin C9 Precipitation __________ _ _____ _ C13 Tides ____________________________________ C14 Volume of the estuary _________________________ C15 Estuary mechanics _______________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Access Strategy Phase 1 Context Setting: Projects to Be Constructed in the Next 10 Years Table of Contents
    DOWNTOWN ACCESS STRATEGY PHASE 1 Context Setting: Projects to be Constructed in the Next 10 Years September 25, 2013 Downtown Access Strategy Phase 1 Context Setting: Projects to be Constructed in the Next 10 Years Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 II. Review of Existing Plans, Projects, and Programs ......................................... 2 III. Potential Construction Concerns and Opportunities .................................. 3 A. Existing Construction Planning Tools 3 B. SDOT’s Construction Hub Coordination Program 4 C. Construction Mitigation Strategies Used by Other Cities 7 D. Potential Construction Conflicts and Opportunities 10 IV. Future Transportation Network Opportunities ......................................... 12 A. North Downtown 12 B. Denny Triangle / Westlake Hub 14 C. Pioneer Square / Chinatown-ID 15 D. Downtown Core and Waterfront 16 V. Future Phases of Downtown Access Strategy ............................................. 18 A. Framework for Phase 2 (2014 through 2016) 18 B. Framework for Phase 3 (Beyond 2016) 19 - i - September 25, 2013 Downtown Access Strategy Phase 1 Context Setting: Projects to be Constructed in the Next 10 Years I. INTRODUCTION Many important and long planned transportation and development projects are scheduled for con- struction in Downtown Seattle in the coming years. While these investments are essential to support economic development and job growth and to enhance Downtown’s stature as the region’s premier location to live, work, shop and play, in the short-term they present complicated challenges for con- venient and reliable access to and through Downtown. The Downtown Seattle Association (DSA) and its partners, Historic South Downtown (HSD) and the Seat- tle Department of Transportation (SDOT), seek to ensure that Downtown Seattle survives and prospers during the extraordinarily high level of construction activity that will occur in the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • Duwamish Superfund HIA Tribal Report Final June 2013 Clean
    Health Impact Assessment Proposed Cleanup Plan for the Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site Technical Report September, 2013 (Final version) Assessment and Recommendations Effects of the proposed cleanup plan on Tribes Duwamish Superfund HIA – Technical Report: Tribes (Final version; September 2013) Technical report This technical report supports our HIA Final Report, published in September, 2013. This technical report is identical to the version that accompanied our Public Comment HIA Report, which was submitted to EPA on June 13, 2013. Acknowledgment and disclaimer We are indebted to the many agencies, organizations, and individuals who have contributed their time, information, and expertise to this project. This project and report were supported by a grant from the Health Impact Project, a collaboration oF the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts; and also by the Rohm & Haas Professorship in Public Health Sciences, sponsored by the Rohm & Haas Company of Philadelphia. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Health Impact Project, The Pew Charitable Trusts, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, or the Rohm & Haas Company. Health Impact Assessment authors William Daniell University of Washington Linn Gould * Just Health Action BJ Cummings Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition/Technical Advisory Group Jonathan Childers University of Washington Amber Lenhart University of Washington * Primary author(s) for this technical report. Suggested citation Gould L, Cummings BJ, Daniell W, Lenhart A, Childers J. Health Impact Assessment: Proposed Cleanup Plan for the Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site; Technical Report: Effects of the proposed cleanup plan on Tribes. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Just Health Action, and Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition/Technical Advisory Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Center City Connector Transit Study LPA Report
    The Seattle Department of Transportation Seattle Center City Connector Transit Study Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) R e port Executive Summary August 2014 in association with: URS Shiels Obletz Johnsen CH2MHill Natalie Quick Consulting John Parker Consulting BERK Consulting VIA Architecture Alta Planning + Design DKS Associates I | LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT ― EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LTK Cover image from SDOT Seattle Center City Connector Transit Study Executive Summary Volume I: LPA Report 1. Project Overview 2. Purpose and Need 3. Evaluation Framework 4. Evaluation of Alternatives 5. Summary of Tier 1 Screening and Tier 2 Evaluation Results and Public Input 6. Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative 7. Next Steps Volume I Appendix A: Project Purpose and Need Volume II: Detailed Evaluation Report 1. Project Overview 2. Evaluation Framework and Public Outreach 3. Initial Screening of Alternatives (Purpose and Need) 4. Summary of Tier 1 Alternatives and Evaluation Results 5. East-West Connection Assessment 6. Description of Tier 2 Alternatives 7. Tier 2 Evaluation Results 8. Tier 2 Public Outreach Summary 9. Tier 2 Recommendation Volume II Technical Appendices (Methodology and Detailed Results) Appendix A: Ridership Projections Appendix B: Additional Ridership Markets: Visitors and Special Events Appendix C: Operating and Maintenance Cost Methodology and Estimates Appendix D: Loading Analysis Appendix E: Capital Cost Methodology and Estimates Appendix F: Utility Impacts Assessment Appendix G: Traffic Analysis Appendix H Evaluation
    [Show full text]