SMRT Corp (MRT SP) SMRT Corp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SMRT Corp (MRT SP) SMRT Corp Singapore Industrials 2 December 2015 SMRT Corp (MRT SP) SMRT Corp Target price: SGD1.31 Share price (1 Dec): SGD1.46 | Up/downside: -10.0% Initiation: not time to get on board yet Rail segment operating losses look set to persist over medium term Jame Osman (65) 6321 3092 Market expectations of a new rail model appear unfounded to us [email protected] Initiating coverage with Underperform (4); TP of SGD1.31 Investment case: We initiate coverage of SMRT Corp (SMRT) with an Share price performance Underperform (4) rating. While the Singapore Government’s overhaul of the (SGD) (%) public transport sector across rail and bus segments signals a more 1.8 110 favourable outlook for incumbent players, we believe the bus operators are 1.6 103 positioned to benefit from an arguably more attractive change in the 1.5 95 1.3 88 business model than the rail segment, mainly as revenue and ridership 1.1 80 risks will be effectively transferred to the government in the case of the Dec-14 Mar-15 Jun-15 Sep-15 Dec-15 former. SMRT (LHS) Relative to FSSTI (RHS) Considering that the rail business is SMRT’s largest segment (53% of FY15 12-month range 1.14-1.80 revenue), while the bus segment is ComfortDelGro’s (CDG) (CD SP, Market cap (USDbn) 1.57 SGD2.96, Buy [1]) largest segment (32% of its Singapore revenue), CDG 3m avg daily turnover (USDm) 2.18 appears better placed to leverage this shift in the operational landscape. Shares outstanding (m) 1,522 Major shareholder Temasek Holdings (54.2%) Accordingly, we recommend investors seeking exposure to the defensive Singapore transport services sector to switch from SMRT to CDG. Financial summary (SGD) Meanwhile, we forecast the operating losses for SMRT’s rail segment to Year to 31 Mar 16E 17E 18E persist over FY16-18, as it grapples with dealing with network disruptions, Revenue (m) 1,305 1,309 1,321 while concurrently executing its rail-enhancement projects. Operating profit (m) 117 125 134 Net profit (m) 88 94 99 Core EPS (fully-diluted) 0.058 0.061 0.065 Finally, market expectations of a positive outcome for rail reforms in the EPS change (%) (3.1) 6.1 6.2 near term appear unfounded to us, given the lack of clarity – comments Daiwa vs Cons. EPS (%) 1.4 (1.0) (16.5) made by both the former and current transport minister suggest instead PER (x) 25.2 23.7 22.3 Dividend yield (%) 2.2 2.3 2.5 that the central agenda remains on improving Singapore’s rail reliability DPS 0.032 0.034 0.036 before addressing asset acquisitions. We believe negotiations between PBR (x) 2.5 2.4 2.2 SMRT and the government will gain traction only after the operator has EV/EBITDA (x) 9.0 8.5 8.2 ROE (%) 10.0 10.2 10.3 fulfilled its obligations to return rail network reliability to satisfactory levels Source: FactSet, Daiwa forecasts under its existing licence requirements – indicating a timeline that could stretch beyond 2018. Catalysts: In the near term, we see the following derating catalysts: 1) news flow suggesting a delay in the implementation of a new rail model, 2) a sharper-than-expected deterioration in the rail segment’s margin, driven by higher repair/maintenance expenses, and to a lesser extent, 3) further major service disruptions to its network, which may result in significant penalties imposed by the regulator. Valuation: We adopt a DCF-based approach to value SMRT’s shares, deriving a 12-month target price of SGD1.31. We value SMRT with the following inputs: a WACC of 7.2%, comprising a 6% equity-risk premium, risk-free rate of 2.6% and a terminal FCF growth rate of 1.0%. Risks: The main risks to our call would be regulatory risks in the form of positive rail reforms as well as a decrease in labour costs. See important disclosures, including any required research certifications, beginning on page 31 SMRT Corp (MRT SP): 2 December 2015 Table of contents Getting back on track ............................................................................................... 6 Investment thesis ...............................................................................................................6 Rail: network upgrades weigh on operational performance ................................................8 Bus: transitioning to an asset-light operating model .........................................................14 Taxi business: muted growth ...........................................................................................17 Rental: lack of clear catalysts ...........................................................................................19 Financial analysis ............................................................................................................21 Valuation..........................................................................................................................23 Investment risks ...............................................................................................................25 Shareholding structure and key management ..................................................................26 Appendix 1: Singapore rail network ......................................................................27 2 SMRT Corp (MRT SP): 2 December 2015 How do we justify our view? Growth outlook Valuation Earnings revisions Growth outlook SM RT: operating margin and net-profit forecasts Overall, we forecast a net profit (PATMI) CAGR of 3.0% SGD m over the FY15-18 period, largely driven by an expected 170 25% improvement in the operating margin for its bus segment, 150 20% following the industry’s transition to the new government 130 contracting model (GCM) in August 2016. Meanwhile, we 15% 110 forecast continued operating losses for the rail segment 10% over the FY15-18 period, as we expect the company’s rail- 90 network enhancement initiatives to be a multi-year 70 5% endeavour. 50 0% FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16E FY17E FY18E Net profit (PATMI) (LHS) Operating margin (RHS) Source: Company, Daiwa forecasts SM RT: 12-month forward PER (x) Valuation The stock is currently trading at a 2016E PER of 25.2x, 12M forward PER (x) which is above its past-10-year mean of 20.6x. Our target 43 price of SGD1.31 implies a 2016E PER of 22.6x. While the 38 +2 stdev market could possibly be pricing in expectations of a 33 +1 stdev transition by the rail segment to a new rail model, we 28 believe negotiations between the government and SMRT 23 Mean will only gain traction after the company has fulfilled its 18 obligations to return network reliability to satisfactory levels -1 stdev 13 under its existing licence requirements, indicating a -2 stdev timeline that could stretch beyond 2018. 8 Jul-05 Jul-06 Jul-07 Jul-08 Jul-09 Jul-10 Jul-11 Jul-12 Jul-13 Jul-14 Jul-15 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Source: Bloomberg, Daiwa forecasts Earnings revisions SMRT: Bloomberg EPS consensus revisions The Bloomberg consensus EPS forecasts for FY16-17 SGD SGD have seen downward revisions of 14-23% over the past 12 0.10 1.8 1.7 months, which we attribute mainly to increased 0.09 1.6 0.08 expectations of higher repair and maintenance and staff 1.5 costs, as well as the announcement of a 1.9% reduction in 0.07 1.4 1.3 fare prices. Looking ahead, management has indicated 0.06 that it expects the operating margin to remain depressed 1.2 0.05 on elevated repair and maintenance expenses, as well as 1.1 the expansion of its engineering workforce, resulting in 0.04 1 higher staff costs. Jul-15 Apr-15 Oct-15 Jan-15 Jun-15 Mar-15 Feb-15 Nov-15 Nov-14 Dec-14 Aug-15 Sep-15 May-15 FY16 EPS FY17 EPS Price Source: Bloomberg 3 SMRT Corp (MRT SP): 2 December 2015 Financial summary Key assumptions Year to 31 Mar 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E Operating margin - Bus (%) (0.8) (5.3) (15.0) (13.0) (2.7) 3.0 4.8 8.0 Operating margin - Taxi (%) (2.1) 2.4 4.9 7.3 9.6 13.0 10.0 10.0 Operating margin - MRT (%) 21.5 16.0 10.7 0.9 2.1 (2.5) (2.0) (2.0) Operating margin - LRT (%) (3.8) (3.3) (9.8) (20.0) (38.7) (55.0) (50.0) (45.0) Operating margin - Rental (%) 77.5 77.3 75.8 75.2 66.1 60.0 62.0 62.0 Profit and loss (SGDm) Year to 31 Mar 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E Rail 537 580 619 634 654 680 694 714 Bus 213 220 211 218 238 248 232 215 Other Revenue 220 257 290 312 343 377 384 392 Total Revenue 970 1,057 1,119 1,164 1,236 1,305 1,309 1,321 Other income 20 22 36 42 58 65 50 50 COGS (514) (613) (690) (739) (756) (802) (837) (869) SG&A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other op.expenses (280) (318) (355) (383) (417) (451) (397) (369) Operating profit 196 149 110 84 121 117 125 134 Net-interest inc./(exp.) (5) (5) (5) (9) (11) (14) (15) (17) Assoc/forex/extraord./others 2 3 (0) (0) 1 4 4 4 Pre-tax profit 192 147 105 75 111 107 114 121 Tax (31) (27) (22) (13) (20) (20) (21) (22) Min. int./pref. div./others 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Net profit (reported) 161 120 83 62 91 88 94 99 Net profit (adjusted) 161 120 83 62 91 88 94 99 EPS (reported)(SGD) 0.106 0.079 0.055 0.041 0.060 0.058 0.061 0.065 EPS (adjusted)(SGD) 0.106 0.079 0.055 0.041 0.060 0.058 0.061 0.065 EPS (adjusted fully-diluted)(SGD) 0.106 0.079 0.055 0.041 0.060 0.058 0.061 0.065 DPS (SGD) 0.085 0.075 0.025 0.022 0.033 0.032 0.034 0.036 EBIT 196 149 110 84 121 117 125 134 EBITDA 315 278 261 256 314 331 356 378 Cash flow (SGDm) Year to 31 Mar 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E Profit before tax 192 147 105 75 111 107 114 121 Depreciation and amortisation 135 163 178 181 203 224 240 254 Tax paid (32) (43) (15) (5) (9) (20) (21) (22) Change in working capital (14) 11 (19) (13) (10)
Recommended publications
  • Modelling Walking Accessibility to Public Transport Terminals
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Modelling walking accessibility to public transport terminals Sony Sulaksono Wibowo 2005 Sony, S. W. (2005). Modelling walking accessibility to public transport terminals. Master’s thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/12007 https://doi.org/10.32657/10356/12007 Nanyang Technological University Downloaded on 24 Sep 2021 19:39:21 SGT ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library Modelling Walking Accessi biI ity to Public Transport Terminals Sony Sulaksono Wibowo School of Civil & Environmental Engineering A thesis submitted to Nanyang Technological University in fulfilment of requirement for the degree of Master of Engineering 2005 ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Alhamdulillah - Praise be to Allah SWT, the Cherisher and Sustainers of the worlds. First at all, I am thankful and grateful to my supervisor, Associate Professor Piotr Olszewski, for his guidance, advice, and encouragement throughout the duration of my research. The patience, effort and time that he devoted to me have enabled me to complete and present my research in this form. I also appreciate his generous kindness given to me on the matters not related to my research. My sincere appreciation is given to Professor Henry Fan, Associate Professor Wong Yiik Diew, Associate Professor Lum Kit Meng, and all faculty members of the Transportation Division of the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) NTU. My individual appreciation is given to Associate Professor Harianto Rahardjo for his support and kindness to me passing through the difficulties time.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Delegation of the Panel on Transport on Its Duty Visit To
    LC Paper No. CB(4)823/14-15 The Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ___________________________________________ Delegation of the Panel on Transport Report on the duty visit to Singapore to study its experience in development and provision of public transport facilities and traffic control measures 23 to 26 September 2014 ___________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the report 1 1.2 Background of the visit 1 1.3 Objectives of the visit 2 1.4 Membership of the delegation 3 1.5 Visit programme 3 2 Overview of the transport strategy in Singapore 2.1 Overview 4 2.2 Building up a quality public transport system 5 2.3 Maximizing road network efficiency capacity 6 2.4 Establishing a bike-friendly city 7 2.5 Enhancing accessibility to public transport 7 3 Visits and exchanges 3.1 Meeting with the Minister for Transport 8 3.2 Meeting with the representatives of the Land Transport 14 Authority 3.3 Meeting with the Chairman and Deputy Chairman of 23 the Government Parliamentary Committee for Transport 3.4 Meeting with the representatives of the SBS Transit and 29 visit to the North East Line's Operations Control Centre and the Sengkang Integrated Transport Hub 3.5 Meeting with the Director of the Hong Kong Economic 39 and Trade Office in Singapore 3.6 Visit to the Marina Bay Cruise Centre Singapore and its 43 connecting transport facilities 3.7 Visit to cycling facilities near Pasir Ris Town 47 4 Observations and conclusions 4.1 Observations 51 4.2 Conclusions 55 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 56 Acronyms and Abbreviations 57 Appendices I Visit programme 58 II List of the organizations and persons met by the delegation 59 References 61 CHAPTER 1 — INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of the report 1.1.1 A delegation of the Panel on Transport ("the Panel") of the Legislative Council visited Singapore from 23 to 26 September 2014 to study the country's experience in development and provision of public transport facilities and traffic control measures.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Earlier Faculty Research
    UC Berkeley Earlier Faculty Research Title The Transit-Oriented Global Centers for Competitiveness and Livability: State Strategies and Market Responses in Asia Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/44g9t8mj Author Murakami, Jin Publication Date 2010 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California University of California Transportation Center UCTC Dissertation No. UCTC-DISS-2010-02 The Transit-Oriented Global Centers for Competitiveness and Livability: State Strategies and Market Responses in Asia Jin Murakami University of California, Berkeley 2010 The Transit-Oriented Global Centers for Competitiveness and Livability: State Strategies and Market Responses in Asia by Jin Murakami A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Robert B. Cervero, Chair Associate Professor Karen S. Christensen Professor Harrison S. Fraker Spring 2010 The Transit-Oriented Global Centers for Competitiveness and Livability: State Strategies and Market Responses in Asia © 2010 by Jin Murakami Abstract The Transit-Oriented Global Centers for Competitiveness and Livability: State Strategies and Market Responses in Asia by Jin Murakami Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor Robert B. Cervero, Chair Over the past two decades, the spatial development patterns of city-regions have increasingly been shaped by global-scale centripetal and centrifugal market forces. Complex managerial tasks and specialized producer services agglomerate in the central locations of global city-regions, whereas standardized assemble lines, wholesale inventories, and customer services stretch over the peripheral locations of global production networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Operations Review
    OPERATIONS REVIEW SINGAPORE PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICES (BUS & RAIL) • TAXI AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING SERVICES • INSPECTION & TESTING SERVICES DRIVING CENTRE • CAR RENTAL & LEASING • INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES OUTDOOR ADVERTISING Public Transport Services The inaugural On-Demand Public Bus ComfortDelGro Corporation Limited is Services trial, where SBS Transit operated a leading provider of land transport and five bus routes – three in the Joo Koon area related services in Singapore. and two in the Marina-Downtown area – for 2.26 the LTA ended in June 2019. Conducted REVENUE Scheduled Bus during off-peak hours on weekdays, (S$BILLION) SBS Transit Ltd entered into its fourth year commuters could book a ride with an app of operating under the Bus Contracting and request to be picked up and dropped Model (BCM) in 2019, where the provision off at any bus stop within the defined areas. of bus services and the corresponding It was concluded by the LTA that such bus standards are all determined by the Land services were not cost-effective due to Transport Authority (LTA). Under this model, the high technology costs required in the Government retains the fare revenue scaling up. and owns all infrastructure and operating assets such as depots and buses. A major highlight in 2019 was SBS Transit’s active involvement in the three-month long 17,358 Bus routes in Singapore are bundled into public trial of driverless buses on Sentosa TOTAL OPERATING 14 bus packages. Of these, SBS Transit Island with ST Engineering. Operated as an FLEET SIZE operated nine. During the year, it continued on-demand service, visitors on the island to be the biggest public bus operator with could book a shuttle ride on any of the a market share of 61.1%.
    [Show full text]
  • A Real-Time Tracking System for Public Train in Malaysia
    Journal of Applied Technology and Innovation (e-ISSN: 2600-7304) vol. 3,no. 1, (2019) 1 RT-Train: A Real-Time Tracking System for Public Train in Malaysia Ng Seng Yong1, Mien May Chong2 and Lai Chew Ping3 School of Computing, Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology, Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation (APU), Technology Park Malaysia, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract— Real-time Public Train Tracking System is a system for towards the public transport also one of the important issues the train user to check the train schedule, track the upcoming that affecting the usage of the public transport. train’s location in real-time, and receiving announcement via push notification. In this paper, a new prototype of the Real-Time Public Train Tracking System called “RT-Train” was introduced. This proposed system can reduce the congestion of train users and allows train users to know the accurate train schedule and the real- time location of the train. Besides, it allows the train users to receive the push notification if the train is delayed. In this paper, we had also included an Abstract Architecture in explaining the system flow of the proposed system by using use case diagram. In the testing stage, four (4) major sub stages includes Unit Testing, Integration Testing, System Testing and User Acceptance Testing (UAT) have been done. From the results, all the actual results are same as the expected results. As a conclusion, the proposed system has achieved all the objectives that aimed by us.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Smart Card Data to Extract Passenger's Spatio-Temporal Density and Train's Trajectory of MRT System
    Using Smart Card Data to Extract Passenger’s Spatio-temporal Density and Train’s Trajectory of MRT System Lijun Sun Der-Horng Lee Alex Erath National University of National University of Future Cities Laboratory Singapore Singapore Singapore-ETH Centre Future Cities Laboratory [email protected] [email protected] Singapore-ETH Centre [email protected] Xianfeng Huang Future Cities Laboratory Singapore-ETH Centre [email protected] ABSTRACT Thus, with this model, the location of a certain train and Rapid tranit systems are the most important public trans- the number of onboard passengers can be estimated, which portation service modes in many large cities around the can further enable transit agencies to improve their response world. Hence, its service reliability is of high importance for to service disruptions. Since the respective final destination government and transit agencies. Despite taking all the nec- can also be derived from the data set, one can develop effec- essary precautions, disruptions cannot be entirely prevented tive failure response scenarios such as the planning of con- but what transit agencies can do is to prepare to respond tingency buses that bring passengers directly to their final to failure in a timely and effective manner. To this end, in- destinations and thus relieves the bridging buses that are formation about daily travel demand patterns are crucial to typically made available in such situations. develop efficient failure response strategies. To the extent of urban computing, smart card data offers us the opportu- Categories and Subject Descriptors nity to investigate and understand the demand pattern of H.2.8 [Database Management]: Database Applications— passengers and service level from transit operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3 Project Description Projek Mass Rapid Transit Laluan 2 : Sg
    Section 3 Project Description Projek Mass Rapid Transit Laluan 2 : Sg. Buloh – Serdang - Putrajaya Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment SECTION 3 : PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3. SECTION 3 : PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 INTRODUCTION The main objective of the Project is to facilitate future travel demand in the Klang Valley and to complement the connectivity to Kuala Lumpur by improving the current rail coverage and increasing accessibility of public transport network to areas not currently served or covered by public transport. The SSP Line will serve the existing residential areas, minimize overlapping with existing rail service and provide convenient access to Kuala Lumpur city centre. This section describes the Project in terms of the proposed alignment and stations, the planning and design basis, operation system and the construction methodology. 3.2 PLANNING AND DESIGN BASIS The over-arching principles in the development of the KVMRT is even network coverage, entry into the city centre, location of stations in densely populated areas and ability to sustain future expansion. The GKL/KV PTMP has identified key issues in the rail network such as capacity and quality of existing systems, integration between modes, gaps in network coverage and mismatch in land use planning. Considering the gap in the network, particularly in the northwest – southern corridor, the SSP Line is designed to serve the city centre to Sg Buloh, Kepong, Serdang and Putrajaya areas. The SSP Line will traverse through high density residential and commercial areas and has the capacity to move large volumes of people from the suburban areas to the employment and business centres. In terms of planning basis, the main objectives of the Project are as follows:- • To meet the increasing demand for rail based urban public transportation • To increase the railway network coverage and its capacity • To provide better integration between the new SSP Line and existing rail lines such as LRT, Monorail, SBK Line and KTM lines as well as the future High Spee Rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual City Development 2014 Brochure 2
    Hilton Singapore The future is not in the hands 19 th – 21st November 2014 of fate but in ours. Jules Jusserand Building a vibrant and sustainable city to draw more investments and enhance your city’s liveability for a higher quality of urban living Featuring Government, Regulatory Authorities & Statutory Bodies: Ken Ong City Councillor & Chair of the Planning Committee Dr. Saleem Janjua National Project Manager – PAKSTRAN Mardiana Rahayu M. Afran SVP, Planning City of Melbourne, Australia Project & Development “ World’s Most Liveable City for 3 years in a row , Economist UNDP, Pakistan 1Malaysian Development Berhad (1MDB), Malaysia Intelligence Unit (EIU) 2013” Frven Lim Deputy MD & Director, Design Emma Martini President Director Dave Ong Kwang Leong Deputy Director, Passenger Service Surbana, Singapore PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero), Indonesia SMRT Corporation, Singapore Paromita Roy Deputy Director, Architecture Joseph D’ Cruz Regional Team Leader – Inclusive Growth Mohd Azharuddin Mat Sah Director – Urban Public Transport Delhi Development Authority (DDA) – Ministry of Urban United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Thailand Performance Management Delivery Unit (PEMANDU) Development, India Dr. Olivia Jensen Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia Member Water Policy Stephen Ashford Executive Director High Court Special Task Force on Urban Transportation & National University of Singapore Vendor Policy under Chief Secretary, Delhi 1Malaysian Development Berhad (1MDB), Malaysia Joris van
    [Show full text]
  • Information Memorandum for Mercatus' Multi-Currency Medium
    IMPORTANT NOTICE NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES OR TO U.S. PERSONS IMPORTANT: You must read the following disclaimer before continuing. The following disclaimer applies to the attached information memorandum. You are advised to read this disclaimer carefully before accessing, reading or making any other use of the attached information memorandum. In accessing the attached information memorandum, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them from time to time, each time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. Confirmation of Your Representation: In order to be eligible to view the attached information memorandum or make an investment decision with respect to the securities, investors must not be a U.S. person (within the meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act (as defined below)). The attached information memorandum is being sent at your request and by accepting the e-mail and accessing the attached information memorandum, you shall be deemed to have represented to us (1) that you are not resident in the United States (“U.S.”) nor a U.S. Person, as defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), nor are you acting on behalf of a U.S. Person, the electronic mail address that you gave us and to which this e-mail has been delivered is not located in the U.S. and, to the extent you purchase the securities described in the attached information memorandum, you will be doing so pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act, and (2) that you consent to delivery of the attached information memorandum and any amendments or supplements thereto by electronic transmission.
    [Show full text]
  • Sbs Transit Teams up with Ratp Dev to Deliver World-Class Metro Services in Singapore
    SBS TRANSIT TEAMS UP WITH RATP DEV TO DELIVER WORLD-CLASS METRO SERVICES IN SINGAPORE 15 December 2020 - SBS Transit and France’s RATP Dev have formally entered into a strategic partnership that will set a new benchmark in delivering world-class metro services in Singapore. A new jointly-owned company helmed by a dedicated team of experienced staff, who will be selected from both organisations, will be set up to vie for the opportunity to demonstrate the value and benefits it offers by exploring new business prospects in the Singapore rail industry. The Company will also propose Centres of Excellence to reduce reliance on original equipment manufacturers and life-cycle reliability as part of its efforts to strengthen the reliability of Singapore’s railway system and promote local rail engineering capabilities. Embracing a sustainable and cost-effective approach, it will create localised solutions through the transfer of technology and competencies by leveraging on the international expertise of RATP Dev’s parent company, the RATP Group, in areas such as system agnostic procurement and maintenance. This partnership brings together 87 years of combined experience, knowledge and skills in railway operations and maintenance. SBS Transit Acting Chief Executive Officer, Mr Cheng Siak Kian, and RATP Dev Chief Executive Officer Asia-Pacific, Middle-East & North Africa, Mr Olivier Badard signed a Teaming Agreement to officially announce this partnership on Monday, 14 December 2020. This was witnessed by Mr Franck Riester, France Minister Delegate for Foreign Trade and Economic Attractiveness, with Mr Lim Jit Poh, SBS Transit’s Chairman and Ms Laurence Batlle, RATP Dev’s Chairwoman of the Executive Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Fare Review Mechanism Committee Report 2013
    AFFORDABLE FARES, SUSTAINABLE PUBLIC TRANSPORT The Fare Review Mechanism Committee Report 2013 Copyright 2013 The Fare Review Mechanism Committee All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanised, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright holder. CONTENTS 6 Letter from the Chairman 8 How to read this report 9 In a nutshell 16 Chapter One Inception 19 Chapter Two Background 26 Chapter Three Consulting stakeholders 34 Chapter Four More concessions 44 Chapter Five Fare affordability 50 Chapter Six Fare adjustment formula 62 Chapter Seven Fare review mechanism 72 Chapter Eight Summary of benefits for commuters 77 Thank you 78 Glossary of terms 82 Annex A Details of allowable fare cap and actual fare increases from 2005 to 2012 83 Annex B Comparison of public transport fares across cities 85 Annex C Viability of Public Transport Operators Letter from the Chairman As a society, we have LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN to ensure that public Every day, our people depend on public transport to go to school, to transport is affordable work, to the market, for their recreation, and to go about their daily lives. Public transport is a basic need in Singapore. Recent reflections and accessible for all from Our Singapore Conversation, the national dialogue, tell us that Singaporeans. Singaporeans want assurance of affordability and accessibility for basic needs. As a society, we have to ensure that public transport is affordable and accessible for all Singaporeans. Our public transport must be safe.
    [Show full text]
  • Mono-Rail Guided Transport
    Mono-Rail guided Transport - From the 1902 Mono-Rail guided Bullock Cart in India to the 21th Century Centre Mono-Rail guided Los Angeles Automated Airport People Mover (LAX APM) in USA Indian Steam hauled Patiala Mono-Rail (1907-1927) preserved in running Condition in National Rail Museum at New Delhi By F.A. Wingler June 2019 1 From the 1902 Mono-Rail guided Bullock Cart in India to the 21th Century Mono-Rail guided Los Angeles Airport Automatic People Mover (LAX APM) in USA I. Mono-Rail guided Carriage Transport in India from 1902 to 1927 The first Mono-Rail guided goods carriage system, a road borne railway system, had been the Kundala Valley Railway in India, which was built in 1902 and operated between Munnar and Top Station in the Kannan Devan Hills of Kerala. It operated with a cart- vehicle, built to transport tea and other goods. The initial cart road was cut in 1902 and then replaced by the monorail goods carriage system along the road leading from Munnar to Top Station for the purpose of transporting tea and other products from Munnar and Madupatty to Top Station. This monorail was based on the Ewing System (see below) and had small steel-wheels placed on the mono-rail track while a larger wheel rested on the road to balance the monorail. The mono-rail was pulled by bullocks. Top Station was a trans-shipment point for delivery of tea from Munnar to Bodinayakkanur. Tea chests arriving at Top Station were then transported by an aerial ropeway from Top Station 5 km (3 mi) down-hill to the south to Kottagudi, Tamil Nadu, which popularly became known as "Bottom Station".
    [Show full text]