DOCSLIB.ORG

2020-2025 Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020-2025 Management Plan Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve 2020-2025 Management Plan August 2020 | Final Acknowledgements This document was prepared with funds from Grant Award Number NA18NOS420018, Office of Coastal Management (OCM), National Ocean Service (NOS) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce. Principal contributors included: Steve Miller, Coastal Training Program Coordinator; Kelle Loughlin, Education Coordinator; Beth Heckman, Assistant Education Coordinator; Chris Peter, Research Coordinator; Rachel Stevens, Stewardship Coordinator; Katie Callahan, New Hampshire Fish and Game GIS Specialist; Melissa Brogle, Volunteer Coordinator; Jay Sullivan, Naturalist; Collen McClare, Naturalist; and Cory Riley, Manager. With thanks to Jess Waters and Tricia Miller for editing and formatting services and to Adrianne Harrison of the OCM for guidance and review. i Contents Figures . iii Executive Summary . iv Introduction to the National Estuarine Research Reserve System . 1 Introduction to the Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve . 4. GBNERR Strategic Plan . 17 Research Plan . 20 Education Plan . 30 Coastal Training Program Plan . 39 Administrative Plan . 48 Volunteer Plan. 56 Resource Protection and Stewardship Plan . 61 Public Access and Visitor Plan . .72 Facilities Development and Improvement Plan . 78. Land Acquisition Plan . 85 Citations . 98 APPENDIX I MOA between NHFG and NOAA . .101 APPENDIX II Federal Consistency Determination . 106 APPENDIX III Public Involvement and Comments . 108 APPENDIX IV Federal Register Notice . 110 APPENDIX V Wildlife Management Area Rules . .113 APPENDIX VI NHFG Organizational Chart . .124 ii Figures Figure 1: National Estuarine Research Reserve System map . 1 Figure 2: Map of Great Bay in relation to Gulf of Maine . 5 Figure 3: Watershed drainage map of the Great Bay region . 6 Figure 4: Map of key estuarine habitats in Great Bay . 9 Figure 5: SLAMM model results demonstrating marsh loss . 13 Figure 6: GBNERR Boundary: 1989 . 15 Figure 7: GBNERR Boundary, 2005 . 16 Figure 8: Map of monitoring sites . .26 Figure 9: GBNERR organizational chart . .49 Figure 10: NHFG Parcels by Primary Protection Type . 65 Figure 11: GBNERR Conservation of Public Lands by Ownership Type . 66 Figure 12: GBNERR Public Access map . .74 Figure 13: Great Bay Greenland Campus Map . 80 Figure 14: Buffer and core areas of GBNERR, 2020 . 90 Figure 15: GBNERR 2020 Acquisition Zone . .92 Figure 16: GBNERR 2019 Habitat Priority–Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM) . 93 Figure 17: GBNERR 2017 Habitat Priority–Wildlife Action Plan (WAP) . .94 Figure 18: NHFG Parcels by Primary Protection Type . .96 iii Executive Summary The Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (GBNERR) was designated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in 1989, in large part due to a group of passionate local environmentalists advocating against the construction of an oil refinery along Great Bay’s shores. The passion of the people who staff, support, and participate in Reserve activities continues to fuel the organization today. Over the past thirty years, GBNERR has expanded in size, relevance, and influence on estuarine issues both locally and nationally. Through time, GBNERR has stayed true to the mission of the NERRS as stated in the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 and the implementing regulations for the NERRS (see 15 C.F.R. § 921: herinafter NERRS regulations), while continually assessing how to serve local communities and the host agency, the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department (NHFG). As of 2020, the NOAA-approved Reserve boundary encompasses 10,235 acres of land and water that includes Little Bay, Great Bay, the mouths of five rivers, and over 30 NHFG managed properties within the watershed and along the shores of the bay. New Hampshire has a very small coastline. Great Bay is located 16 miles inland from the Atlantic coast and has seven rivers that flow into the estuary. Most policy and land use decisions that impact habitat and water quality are made at the local level by volunteer boards or elected officials. This creates a powerful motivation to approach GBNERR’s effort from a watershed perspective by working closely with the communities that surround the bay and its tributaries. The integrated science, coastal training, education, and stewardship programs at GBNERR aim to understand the biophysical and social trends in the region, how these trends influence the health of the estuary and well-being of the people that live around the bay, and what appropriate action can be taken from a personal, professional, and political perspective to protect Great Bay. This management plan articulates a five-year vision for GBNERR to continue to mature as a program, deliver science to inform coastal management, and raise awareness of estuaries and their connection to people using a place-based approach. Within the timeframe of this plan, the Reserve aspires to engage more people and different types of people with GBNERR programs and properties; improve program effectiveness and reach through the use of a renewed Advisory Structure; grow the research program; officially expand the Reserve boundary; and create a stable staffing and facilities plan. The efforts of GBNERR are coordinated with partners in the region to understand and mitigate the largest threats to coastal management in New Hampshire. At this time, the key threats and stressors facing Great Bay Reserve and the surrounding communities fall into two interconnected categories: • Land use changes in the New Hampshire Seacoast that impact water quality and habitat. • Climate change, which magnifies the issues related to land use change because of increased precipitation, changes to physical and chemical conditions, and species and habitat shifts. To address these threats, the Reserve sets out the following mission, vision, goals, and objectives: Mission: Practice and promote the stewardship of estuaries through integrated and innovative research, education, resource management, and training in the Great Bay Watershed. Vision: A resilient Great Bay Watershed, where human and natural communities thrive. iv GOAL 1 Coastal scientists and managers understand how Great Bay is functioning now, how it may function in the future, and how that is influenced by and will impact people in the watershed. OBJECTIVES 1.1: To understand, protect, and restore the structure and function of Great Bay estuarine ecosystems 1.2: To understand the vulnerability and resiliency of Great Bay ecosystems and communities in relation to key stressors. 1.3: To protect representative habitats within the NERR that support native wildlife. STRATEGIES • Work with partners to monitor environmental changes within Great Bay over time. • Facilitate and conduct applied and basic research to advance understanding of the structure and function of estuaries. • Facilitate and conduct science to advance understanding of how stressors are impacting the estuary and how habitat, water quality, and built communities may be impacted in the future. • Develop, share, and use the best science available to prioritize and direct restoration and resource protection strategies. • Work with partners to actively protect estuarine land and restore key habitats. • Convene partners to identify and advance science, protection, and restoration priorities in the region. • Translate and communicate GBNERR and other local science results to decision makers and citizens to inspire and enable action. • Identify key coastal management science and technical needs and use that to guide GBNERR and partner efforts. • Engage in the scientific and technical community of New Hampshire and within the NERRS to enhance understanding of Great Bay and advance national understanding of estuarine resources. GOAL 2 People make personal and professional decisions that help restore and protect ecosystem function while advancing social priorities. OBJECTIVES 2.1: Reserve staff understand how people make professional and personal decisions that could impact Great Bay. 2.2: People have clear information that translates local science. 2.3: People understand the potential consequences and trade-offs of their actions and decisions. 2.4: People recognize that they are an integral part of the Great Bay ecosystem and are inspired to and supported in making choices that protect and restore Great Bay. STRATEGIES: • Advance the understanding of personal and professional motivations and behavior change theory, and apply that to education, outreach, stewardship, and volunteer programming. • Create or enhance outdoor experiences that inspire an engaged citizenry to act on behalf of the health of Great Bay. • Translate science and coastal management questions in a tailored way is appropriate and relevant to specific audiences. • Enhance opportunities for multi-directional dialogue and collaborative idea generation about what the key coastal issues are in the region and how to solve them. • Deliver high quality training and education programs that demonstrate how people and the estuary are interdependent and give participants practical information and tools to change how they work and act. • Encourage investigation and communication about trade-offs between different policy, restoration, and behavioral decisions. • Work with the Great Bay Stewards to engage a larger and more diverse group of people to participate, volunteer, and experience GBNERR and GBNERR programs. v Awards and Achievements The last management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 16817.00 NHDOT PIN: PK 13678E Prepared by (Name/F
    Project Name: ME-NH Connections Study FHWA No: PR-1681(700X) MaineDOT PIN: 16817.00 NHDOT PIN: PK 13678E Prepared by (Name/Firm): Lauren Meek, P.E., HNTB Contract Number: 20090325000000005165 Technical Memorandum No.: 3 - Navigational Needs of the Piscataqua River Date (month/year): August, 2009 Subject: Navigational Data for the Sarah Mildred Long and Portsmouth Memorial Bridges Background This Tech Memo is a supplement to a 2006 HNTB memo that identified issues and preferences for users of the Piscataqua River during the rehabilitation of the Portsmouth Memorial Bridge based on a mail-back navigational survey. This 2006 memo is attached as Appendix A. Purpose The purpose of this memorandum is to: a.) summarize the existing horizontal and vertical clearances and identify the minimum required bridge lifts versus the actual number of bridge lifts of the Sarah Mildred Long and Portsmouth Memorial Bridges; b.) identify the users of the river; c.) analyze the bridge lift records; d.) summarize feedback from users of the river and those responsible for the river’s operation. Additionally, a survey to address the current and future uses has been sent to users of the river. A separate technical memorandum will be prepared with the analysis of the responses when received. 1 Methodology a. Existing Clearances and Frequency of Lifts Table 1 provides the clearances for the three lower Piscataqua River bridges as identified on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chart 13283, 20th Edition. The vertical clearance is the distance between mean high water and the underside of the bridge. The Portsmouth Memorial and Sarah Mildred Long Bridges have lift spans that provide additional vertical clearance when opened.
    [Show full text]
  • Designation of Critical Habitat for the Gulf of Maine, New York Bight, And
    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 35701 the Act, including the factors identified Recovery and State Grants, Ecological Public hearings and public in this finding and explanation (see Services Program, U.S. Fish and information meetings: We will hold two Request for Information, above). Wildlife Service. public hearings and two public informational meetings on this proposed Conclusion Authority rule. We will hold a public On the basis of our evaluation of the The authority for these actions is the informational meeting from 2 to 4 p.m., information presented under section Endangered Species Act of 1973, as in Annapolis, Maryland on Wednesday, 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act, we have amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). July 13 (see ADDRESSES). A second determined that the petition to remove Dated: May 25, 2016. public informational meeting will be the golden-cheeked warbler from the Stephen Guertin, held from 3 to 5 p.m., in Portland, List of Endangered and Threatened Maine on Monday, July 18 (see Wildlife does not present substantial Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. ADDRESSES). We will hold two public scientific or commercial information [FR Doc. 2016–13120 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am] hearings, from 3 to 5 p.m. and 6 to 8 indicating that the requested action may p.m., in Gloucester, Massachusetts on BILLING CODE 4333–15–P be warranted. Therefore, we are not Thursday, July 21 (see ADDRESSES). initiating a status review for this ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, species. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE identified by the NOAA–NMFS–2015– We have further determined that the 0107, by either of the following petition to list the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire River Protection and Energy Development Project Final
    ..... ~ • ••. "'-" .... - , ... =-· : ·: .• .,,./.. ,.• •.... · .. ~=·: ·~ ·:·r:. · · :_ J · :- .. · .... - • N:·E·. ·w··. .· H: ·AM·.-·. "p• . ·s;. ~:H·1· ··RE.;·.· . ·,;<::)::_) •, ·~•.'.'."'~._;...... · ..., ' ...· . , ·....... ' · .. , -. ' .., .- .. ·.~ ···•: ':.,.." ·~,.· 1:·:,//:,:: ,::, ·: :;,:. .:. /~-':. ·,_. •-': }·; >: .. :. ' ::,· ;(:·:· '5: ,:: ·>"·.:'. :- .·.. :.. ·.·.···.•. '.1.. ·.•·.·. ·.··.:.:._.._ ·..:· _, .... · -RIVER~-PR.OT-E,CT.10-N--AND . ·,,:·_.. ·•.,·• -~-.-.. :. ·. .. :: :·: .. _.. .· ·<··~-,: :-:··•:;·: ::··· ._ _;· , . ·ENER(3Y~EVELOP~.ENT.PROJ~~T. 1 .. .. .. .. i 1·· . ·. _:_. ~- FINAL REPORT··. .. : .. \j . :.> ·;' .'·' ··.·.· ·/··,. /-. '.'_\:: ..:· ..:"i•;. ·.. :-·: :···0:. ·;, - ·:··•,. ·/\·· :" ::;:·.-:'. J .. ;, . · · .. · · . ·: . Prepared by ~ . · . .-~- '·· )/i<·.(:'. '.·}, •.. --··.<. :{ .--. :o_:··.:"' .\.• .-:;: ,· :;:· ·_.:; ·< ·.<. (i'·. ;.: \ i:) ·::' .::··::i.:•.>\ I ··· ·. ··: · ..:_ · · New England ·Rtvers Center · ·. ··· r "., .f.·. ~ ..... .. ' . ~ "' .. ,:·1· ,; : ._.i ..... ... ; . .. ~- .. ·· .. -,• ~- • . .. r·· . , . : . L L 'I L t. ': ... r ........ ·.· . ---- - ,, ·· ·.·NE New England Rivers Center · !RC 3Jo,Shet ·Boston.Massachusetts 02108 - 117. 742-4134 NEW HAMPSHIRE RIVER PRO'l'ECTION J\ND ENERGY !)EVELOPMENT PBOJECT . -· . .. .. .. .. ., ,· . ' ··- .. ... : . •• ••• \ ·* ... ' ,· FINAL. REPORT February 22, 1983 New·England.Rivers Center Staff: 'l'bomas B. Arnold Drew o·. Parkin f . ..... - - . • I -1- . TABLE OF CONTENTS. ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS . ~ . • • . .. • .ii EXECUTIVE
    [Show full text]
  • 1982 Maine River's Study Appendix H - Rivers with Historical Landmarks & Register Sites
    1982 Maine River's Study Appendix H - Rivers with Historical Landmarks & Register Sites HISTORI RIVER NAME HISTORIC SITE/PLACE C COUNTY LOCATION LINK Androscoggin River Pejepscot Paper Mill RHP Sagadahoc Topsham https://www.mainememory.net/sitebuilder/site/201/page/460/display Androscoggin River Barker Mill RHP Androscoggin Auburn https://tinyurl.com/y8wsy2a6 Bagaduce River Fort George RHP Hancock Castine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_George_(Castine,_Maine) Carrabasset River (Lemon Stream) New Portland Wire Bridge RHP Somerset New Portland http://www.maine.gov/mdot/historicbridges/otherbridges/wirebridge/index.shtml Damariscotta Oyster Shell Heaps (Whaleback) Damariscotta River RHP Lincoln Damariscotta http://tinyurl.com/m9vgk84 Kennebec Franklin Dead River Dead River Arnold Trail to Quebec RHP Somerset Chain of Ponds http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedict_Arnold%27s_expedition_to_Quebec Ellis River Lovejoy Bridge RHP Oxford South Andover http://www.maine.gov/mdot/historicbridges/coveredbridges/lovejoybridge/ Kenduskeag Stream Robyville Bridge RHP Penobscot Bangor http://www.maine.gov/mdot/historicbridges/coveredbridges/robyvillebridge/ Kenduskeag Stream Morse Bridge RHP Penobscot Bangor http://bangorinfo.com/Focus/focus_kenduskeag_stream.html Kennebec River Fort Baldwin RHP Sagadahoc Popham Beach http://www.maine.gov/cgi-bin/online/doc/parksearch/details.pl?park_id=86 Kennebec River Fort Popham RHP Sagadahoc Popham Beach http://www.fortwiki.com/Fort_Popham Percy and Small Shipyard Kennebec River Maritime Museum District* RHP Sagadahoc
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2011 Vol. 30 No. 1
    V30 N1-Spring-11_v4 12/14/11 8:58 PM Page i New Hampshire Bird Records Spring 2011 Vol. 30, No. 1 V30 N1-Spring-11_v4 12/14/11 8:58 PM Page ii AUDUBON SOCIETY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE New Hampshire Bird Records Volume 30, Number 1 Spring 2011 Managing Editor: Rebecca Suomala 603-224-9909 X309, [email protected] Text Editor: Dan Hubbard Season Editors: Eric Masterson/Lauren Kras/ Ben Griffith, Spring; Tony Vazzano, Summer; Pamela Hunt, Winter Layout: Kathy McBride Assistants: Jeannine Ayer, David Deifik, Dave Howe, Margot Johnson, Susan MacLeod, Marie Nickerson, Carol Plato, William Taffe, Tony Vazzano Field Notes: Robert A. Quinn Photo Quiz: David Donsker Photo Editor: Len Medlock Web Master: Len Medlock Where to Bird: Phil Brown Editorial Team: Phil Brown, Hank Chary, David Deifik, David Donsker, Ben Griffith, Dan Hubbard, Pam Hunt, Lauren Kras, Iain MacLeod, Len Medlock, Robert A. Quinn, Rebecca Suomala, William Taffe, Tony Vazzano, Jon Woolf Cover Photo: Ruff (foreground) with Greater Yellowlegs by Len Medlock, 04/21/11, Chapman’s Landing, Stratham, NH. New Hampshire Bird Records is published quarterly by New Hampshire Audubon’s Conservation Department. Thank you to the many observers who submit their sightings to NH eBird (www.ebird.org/nh), the source of data for this publication. Records are selected for publication and not all species reported will appear in the issue. The published sightings typi- cally represent the highlights of the season. All records are subject to review by the NH Rare Birds Committee and publi- cation of reports here does not imply future acceptance by the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cocheco River
    WD-R&L-23 2019 The Cocheco River The Cocheco River is part of the Piscataqua River drainage basin, flowing near New Hampshire’s boundary with Maine. The Cocheco River watershed’s 175 square miles is entirely within New Hampshire. Headwater streams arise in Milton, Farmington, Middleton and New Durham. The river flows approximately 34.8 miles in a southeastern direction from New Durham, descending to the Cocheco River valley in Farmington. From Farmington to Rochester, it flows as a small river in a forested river corridor. In Rochester the river emerges from the backyards of residential neighborhoods into the urban center of downtown Rochester before becoming tidal in Dover, where it joins with the Salmon Falls River to form the Piscataqua River. The Cocheco River was designated into the New Hampshire Rivers Management and Protection Program in 2009. Land use in the river corridor is a complex mix of rural development, forests, wetlands and heavily-settled urban areas. Rapid suburbanization is decreasing the area of open lands in the middle and lower portions of the sub-watershed. In the lower Cocheco River reach, there is rapid growth in formerly rural areas of Dover, Somersworth and Rochester. Geology The formation of the Cocheco River began about 18,000 years ago, as the last glacier moved its way across New Hampshire. The glacial activity played a major role in influencing the landscape and characteristics of the Cocheco River watershed. Nearly 20% of the watershed is overlain by stratified-drift aquifers, and about 10% of these aquifers are considered to be potentially high-yielding water sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air
    Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air Canada (Alberta – VE6/VA6) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S87.1 Issue number 2.2 Date of issue 1st August 2016 Participation start date 1st October 2012 Authorised Association Manager Walker McBryde VA6MCB Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged Page 1 of 63 Document S87.1 v2.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) 1 Change Control ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Association Reference Data ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Programme derivation ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 General information .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Rights of way and access issues ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Maps and navigation .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Safety considerations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LITTLETON – Law Enforcement Officials Are Learning That Social Me- UNH Coop
    www.newhampshirelakesandmountains.com Publishing news & views of Lancaster, Groveton, Whitefield, Lunenburg & other towns of the upper Connecticut River valley of New Hampshire & Vermont [email protected] VOL. CXLIV, NO. 8 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2012 LANCASTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE TELEPHONE: 603-788-4939 TWENTY-EIGHT PAGES 75¢ Budget Maple syrup-making likely in February Committee By Edith Tucker [email protected] resists efforts LANCASTER — Sugarmaker Dave Fuller of Lancaster started to fully fund “catching some sap” — 500 gal- lons — on Friday, Feb. 17 in a sug- arbush off Route 2, he explained Police on Saturday in his busy retail shop where he and his wife Patti Department sell supplies for other sugarmak- ers, maple syrup and candies, By Mike Fournier and hard-to-find northern New Contributing Writer Hampshire gifts. NORTHUMBERLAND – De- If the weather turns out to be spite encouragement from audi- as predicted, Fuller says he will ence members at the Feb. 15 pub- probably be boiling by the end of lic hearing on the proposed 2012 the week — well before Leap Year town budget, members of the Day — at Fuller’s Sugarhouse on PHOTO BY EDITH TUCKER budget committee resisted ef- Main Street. Sugarmakers across the North Country are getting ready for what forts to restore full funding for “The earliest I’ve ever boiled appears will be a record-breaking early sap run. Dave Fuller of Fuller’s the town’s police department. before was just barely in Febru- Sugarhouse in Lancaster sold Steve Tilton of Groveton, who operates The two and one-half hour ary — and that was just once,” Tilton’s Sugarhouse with his wife Brenda, some tubing and other equip- meeting, attended by less than he said, noting that he and his ment on Saturday.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Biological Species Report for the Bicknell's Thrush (Catharus
    Biological Species Report for the Bicknell’s Thrush (Catharus bicknelli) Version 1.4a Bicknell’s thrush (Photo credit: Alan Schmierer) August 2017 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region Hadley, MA 1 This document was prepared by Anthony Tur (USFWS-New England Field Office (FO)/Northeast Regional Office (RO)), Krishna Gifford (USFWS-Northeast RO), and Beth Forbus (USFWS-Headquarters (HQ)). We greatly appreciate the assistance of Dr. Randy Dettmers (USFWS-Northeast RO), Dr. John Lloyd (Vermont Center for Ecostudies), Dr. Jason Hill (Vermont Center for Ecostudies), Chris Rimmer (Vermont Center for Ecostudies), and Nancy Green (USFWS-HQ) who provided helpful information or review of sections of the working draft document. We would like to thank the following USFWS staff for their review and comments on version 1.0 of the document: Dr. Randy Dettmers (Northeast RO), Anna Harris (Maine FO), Dr. Cherry Keller (Chesapeake Bay FO), Dr. Mark McCollough (Maine FO), Martin Miller (Northeast RO), Sarah Nystrom (Virginia FO), Nicole Ranalli (Pennsylvania FO), Nicole Rankin (Southeast RO), and David Simmons (New England FO). We also would like to thank the following State or Territory natural resources staff, as well as our peer reviewers, for their assistance in reviewing and providing constructive comments on version 1.1 of the document: John W. Ozard (New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Bureau of Wildlife-Avian Diversity Unit), John Kanter and Dr. Pam Hunt (New Hampshire Fish and Game, Nongame and Endangered Wildlife), Ramon Luis Rivera (Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources), Dr. Toni Morelli (U.S. Geological Survey-Northeast Climate Science Center), Alyssa Rosemartin (USA National Phenology Network, University of Arizona), Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2011 Vol. 30 No. 2
    V30 N2-Summer-11_v4 3/22/12 8:09 AM Page i New Hampshire Bird Records Summer 2011 Vol. 30, No. 2 V30 N2-Summer-11_v4 3/22/12 8:09 AM Page ii AUDUBON SOCIETY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE New Hampshire Bird Records Volume 30, Number 2 Summer 2011 Managing Editor: Rebecca Suomala 603-224-9909 X309, [email protected] Text Editor: Dan Hubbard Season Editors: Eric Masterson/ Lauren Kras/ Ben Griffith, Spring; Tony Vazzano, Summer; Pamela Hunt, Winter Layout: Kathy McBride Assistants: Jeannine Ayer, David Deifik, Dave Howe, Margot Johnson, Elizabeth Levy, Susan MacLeod, Marie Nickerson, Carol Plato, William Taffe, Tony Vazzano Field Notes: Robert A. Quinn Photo Quiz: David Donsker Photo Editor: Len Medlock Web Master: Len Medlock Where to Bird: Phil Brown Editorial Team: Phil Brown, Hank Chary, David Deifik, David Donsker, Ben Griffith, Dan Hubbard, Pam Hunt, Lauren Kras, Iain MacLeod, Len Medlock, Robert A. Quinn, Rebecca Suomala, William Taffe, Tony Vazzano, Jon Woolf Cover Photo: Northern Parula by Jason Lambert. We chose this species for the cover because it was Rozzie Holt’s (see Memorial on page 1) favorite. New Hampshire Bird Records is published quarterly by New Hampshire Audubon’s Conservation Department. Thank you to the many observers who submit their sightings to NH eBird (www.ebird.org/nh), the source of data for this publication. Records are selected for publication and not all species reported will appear in the issue. The published sightings typi- cally represent the highlights of the season. All records are subject to review by the NH Rare Birds Committee and publi- cation of reports here does not imply future acceptance by the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Testimony of Kenneth D Kimball
    STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE ENERGY FACILITY SITE EVALUATION COMMITTEE Docket No. SEC 2014-03 Motion of Granite Reliable Power, LLC (“GRP”) to Amend the Certificate of Site and Facility SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY OF KENNETH D. KIMBALL ON BEHALF OF APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB October 23, 2014 Q. Questions of professional expertise and opinions in the area of restoration have been suggested in this proceeding. Do you have experience in ecological restoration work? A. Yes. I was the principle in researching and designing the wetland restoration project of the ecologically important (migratory waterfowl from Russia and fish breeding/nursery for Caspian Sea fishery) 39 square mile Anzali (Pahlavi) Mordab wetland in the Caspian Sea basin, Iran while working in the Smithsonian/Peace Crops Environmental program. My restoration design plans were recently acknowledged in the just published book “ Limnological methods for environmental rehabilitation – The fine art of restoring aquatic ecosystems ” by Sven Bjork, which covers case studies of environmental rehabilitation projects from around the world 1. I was the principle investigator in overseeing AMC’s development and implementation of the recovery plan 2 for the federally listed alpine plant Potentilla robbinsiana for the US Fish and Wildlife Service and White Mountain National Forest, one of the rarest alpine plants in the world. This New Hampshire alpine plant was removed from the federally listed endangered species list in 2002 due to successful implementation of a recovery plan. This was only the 11 th species and second plant species to ever be removed from the federally endangered species list due to successful recovery at that time.
    [Show full text]