DOCSLIB.ORG

Pre-Investment Diagnostic Report on the Prut River Basin: Ukraine, Moldova, Aiid Romania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pre-Investment Diagnostic Report on the Prut River Basin: Ukraine, Moldova, Aiid Romania PRE-INVESTMENT DIAGNOSTIC REPORT ON THE PRUT RIVER BASIN: UKRAINE, MOLDOVA, AIID ROMANIA WASH Field Report No, 424 September 1993 Sponsored by the U.S. Agency for International Development Operated by CDM and Associates WASH Field Report No. 424 PRE-INVESTMENTDIAGNOSTIC REPORT ON THE BRUT RIVER BASIN: UKRAINE, MOLDOVA, AND ROMANIA Prepared for the Office of Health, Bureau for Research and Development, U.S. Agency for International Development, under WASH Task No. 460 Donald Cullivan Tarik Pekin Daniel Edwards and Timothy Bondelid September 1993 Water and Sdtafion for Hdth Project Contnct No. 5973-2-00-8081-00, Pmject No. 936-5973 - is sponsored by the Office of Ha,Bumu for Resurch and Development U .S. Agency for lnternatiod Develapment Washington, DC 20523 RELATED WASH REPORTS Point Source Pollutlon In the Danube Basln: Report on Data Management, Institutional Studies, and Priotlty Pr0)ect.s. Volume I, July 1992. Field Report No, 374. Prepared by Robert Thomas, Max Clark, Tim Bondelid, Dan Edwards, William Lord, and Tarik Pekin, Water Quality Pre-Investment Studies In Four Danube River Tributay Basins. Sumrnay Report. July 1993. Field Report No. 407. Prepared by Jim McCullough, David Horsefield, Tarik Pekin, Max Clark, Dave Larodo, Bill Hogrewe, and Tim Bondelid. Water Quality Pre-Investment Studles In the Yantra Rlver Basin in Bulgarta. August 1993. Field Report No. 408, Prepared by Max Clark, Dave Laredo, and Bffl Hogrewe. Water Quality Pro-lnuestment Studles In the Sajo-Hernad Basin In Hungay. August 1993. Field Report No. 409. Prepared by Jim McCullough, David Horsefield, and Tarik Pekin. Water Quality Pre-lnuestment Studies In the Arges Basin In Romania, Auguj.C 1993. Field Report No. 410. Prepared by Max S. Clark 111, David Laredo, and William Hogrewe. Water Quality Pre-lnulestment Studles In the Homad Basln In Slovakia. August 1993. Field Report No. 411. Prepared by Jim McCullough, David Horsefield, and Tarik Pekin. CONTENTS ABOUTTHEAUTHORS ...... i ..................................v ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................ vii RATES OF EXCHANGE (Aprii 1993) ................................ ix EXECUTIVESUMMARY ........................................ xi 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................... 1 1.1 Background: Danube Environmental Program ................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work ....................................... 2 1.3 Team Activities ....................................... 2 2 . EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE BASIN ........................... 5 Topography ......................................... 5 River Network ........................................ 5 Population and Municipalities .............................. 9 Land Use and Development ............................. 9 Environmental Sftuation ................................ 10 HydrologicConditions ................................. 11 Wateruse ......................................... 12 Major Sources of Water Pollution .......................... 13 2.8.1 Point Sources ................................ 13 2.8.2 Nonpoint Sources ............................. 15 Water Quality ....................................... 20 2.9.1 The Prut FUver ............................... 20 2.9.2 Tributaries of the Prut ........................... 32 Drinking Water Sources and Public Health Issues ............... 32 2.10.1 Ukraine ............................ ....,.,. 32 2.10.2 Romania ................................... 34 2.10.3 Moldova ................................... 35 Assessment of Data Availability and Reliability .................. 38 2.11.1 General .................................... 38 2.11.2 Ukraine ................................... 39 2.11.3 Moldova ................................... 39 2.11.4 Romania ................................... 40 Impact on Danube River ................................ 40 3 . INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ............................... 41 Overview .......................................... 41 3.1.1 The Environmental Sector ........................ 41 3.1.2 Transition and Challenges in the Rlparian Countries ....... 41 3.1.3 Variations Among the Countries .................... 42 Environmental Policies ................................. 42 3.2.1 Form vs. Substance ........................... 42 3.2.2 Responsibility for Environmental Policies .............. 42 Legislation and Agreements ........................ ...... 43 3.3.1 Moldova ................................... 43 3.3.2 Ukraine .................................... 43 Water and Environmental Sector Organizations ................. 44 3.4.1 Moldova ................................... 44 3.4.2 Ukraine .................................... 47 Permits for Extracting Water and Discharging Wastewater ........... 50 3.5.1 Moldova ................................... 50 3.5.2 Ukrahe .................................... 51 Charges for Water and Wastewater Services ................... 53 3.6.1 Moldova .................................... 53 3.6.2 Ukraine .................................... 53 Monitoring and Enforcement ............................. 54 3.7.1 Moldova ................................... 54 3.7.2 Ukraine .................................... 55 Major Institutional Issues ............................... 56 4. IDENTIFICATION OF HOT SPOTS ............................. 59 4.1 Criteria for Selection .................................... '59 4.2 Romania .......................................... 59 4.3 Ukraine ........................................... 60 4.4 Moldova .......................................... 60 5 . CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................... 63 5.1 Critical Environmental Problems ........................... 63 5.2 Guidelines for Pre-Investment Studies ....................... 53 5.2.1 Investment Projects: Ukraine ...................... 63 5.2.2 Investment Projects: Romania ..................... 64 5.2.3 Investment Projects: Moldova ..................... 65 5.3 Institutional Improvements ............................... 66 5.4 Data Management .................................... 67 APPENDIXES A . Persons and Offices Contacted ..................................69 B . Description of Documents and Data Collected ........................75 FIGURES 1. Prut River Basin Location Map .................................. xii 2 . Annual Use of Pesticides in Moldova .............................. 18 3 . DEMDESS Water Quality Profile-BOD.5, 1992 ......................27 4. DEMDESS Water Quality Profile-Ammonia. 1992 .................... 27 5. DEMDESS Water Quality Profile-Dissolved Oxygen. 1992 ..........., ...28 6 . DEMDESS Water Quality Profile-Nitrates. 1992 ...................... 28 7 . DEMDESS Water Quality Profile-Phosphates. 1992 ................... 29 TABLES 1. Prut River Network and Sampling Stations ...........................6 2 . Prut Basin Population Centers .................................. 14 3. Large Farms in Moldova .......................................15 4 . Animal Farms in Romania ..................................... 16 5 . Pesticide Use and storage in Moldova. 1992 .........................19 6 . Pesticide Levels (in micrograms per liter) ............................21 7. Prut River Water Quality Data. 1992 ..............................22 8. Water Quality Criteria for Various Uses ............................. 30 9. Drinking Water Standards in Moldova ............................. 31 10. Infant Mortality Rate in the Prut Basin. 1991 .........................35 iii ABOUT THE AUTHORS Donald Cullivan, P.E., is an environmental engineer with over 35 years' experience in consulting engineering, almost wholly devoted to the planning, assessment, and institutional development of the water and wastewater sector. Most of his experience has been in developing countries in all parts of the world, with seven years as an overseas resident. In the past two years ~VBhas completed assignments in five countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Tarik Pekin, P.E., Senior Environmental Engineer, Camp Dresser & McKee International Inc., has over 20 years' experience in the environmental engineering and planning field, including feasibility studies, environmental impact studies, process selection, process control, design, plant start-up and operator training, project and construction management. His work ranges from basin-wide and multinational environmental studies to specialized process engineering for the treatment of water and wastewater. Mr. Pekin has project experience in Turkey, Eastem Europe, Egypt, and Taiwan. He has written technical papers and made presentations on environmental quality issues and technologies in Turkey, Taiwan, and the United States. Dan Edwards has been with Training Resources Group since 1981. He has over 25 years' experience as a training and organizational development consultant in Latin America, Asia, and the Middle East. He has worked on numerous WASH assignments aver the past nine years, primarily in the area of training and institutional development. Mr. Edwards has been heavily involved in projects in Sri Lanka, Ecuador, Thailand, and Egypt, and has lived in the Dominican Repubiic and Panama. Timothy Bondelid is a research environmental engineer with the Center for Environmental Analysis, Research Triangle Institute. He has been involved over his career as an environmental engineer in computer modeling, data quality and reliability analysis, development of environmental datab~zs,and mapping of hydrologic systems. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Note: M m Moldova, R = Romania, and U - Ukralne
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Implementa on of Basin Management Principle
    Implementaon of basin management principle in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia European Union Water Iniave Naonal Policy Dialogues progress report 2016 May 2016 Implementaon of basin management principle in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia ii Copyright © 2016 United Naons Economic Commission for Europe and Organizaon for Economic Cooperaon and Development The designaons employed and the presentaon of the material in this publicaon do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Naons Economic Commission for Europe and Organizaon for Economic Cooperaon and Development concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or concerning the delimitaon of its froners or boundaries. This publicaon has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. CONTACT INFORMATION Convenon on the Protecon and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and Internaonal Lakes United Naons Economic Commission for Europe Organizaon for Economic Co-operaon and Development Palais des Naons 2 rue André-Pascal CH - 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland 75775 Paris, Cedex 16, France Tel.: + 41 22 917 1193 Tel.: + 33 1 4524 9294 Fax: + 41 22 917 0107 Fax: + 33 1 4430 6183 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.unece.org/env/water/npd Website: www.oecd.org/env/outreach/npd-water-eecca.htm Implementaon of basin management principle in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia iii CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................... iv FOREWORD .................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT on BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
    E of nvi y ro tr n s m i e n i n t M REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA THE FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT on BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Chisinau, 2010 CZU 57(478)(047) R 46 The Report was developed in the framework of the UNDP project “Support to Environmental Protection and Sustainable Use of Natural Resources” with the financial support from Global Environment Facility. The Global Environment Facility (GEF) is the largest public The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is the funder of projects to improve the global environment. An in- UN’s global development network, advocating for change and dependent financial organization, the GEF provides grants for connecting countries to knowledge, experience and resour- projects related to biodiversity, climate change, international ces to help people build a better life. More information about waters, land degradation, the ozone layer, and persistent orga- UNDP at www.undp.org and www.undp.md. nic pollutants. More about GEF at www.theGEF.org. Opinions expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the official views of the United Nations Development Programme in Moldova or the Global Environment Facility. This publication is available in Romanian and English on the webpage: http://bsapm.moldnet.md Autors: dr. Alexandru Teleuta, dr. Andrei Munteanu, dr. hab. Gheorghe Postolache, dr. hab. Alexei Andreev. Contributors: dr. hab. Ion Dediu, dr. hab. Maria Duca, dr. Eugen Alexandrov, dr. Iachim Gumaniuc, dr. Aliona Glijin, dr. Ştefan Manic, dr. Alecu Reniţă, dr. Valeriu Ţarigradschi, Alexandru Apostol, Valeriu Balan, Valentina Căldăruş, Mihai Coca, Alexandru Galupa, Veronica Josu, Alexandru Rotaru, Ala Rotaru, Ion Coţofană, Liliana Josan, Marcela Vatamaniuc, Nicu Vrednic.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft the Prut River Basin Management Plan 2016
    Environmental Protection of International River Basins This project is implemented by a Consortium led by Hulla and Co. (EPIRB) HumanDynamics KG Contract No 2011/279-666, EuropeAid/131360/C/SER/Multi Project Funded by Ministry of Environment the European Union DRAFT THE PRUT RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 - 2021 Prepared in alignment to the EuropeanWater Framework Directive2000/60/EC Prepared by Institute of Ecology and Geography of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova Chisinau, 2015 Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1.General description of the Prut River Basin ................................................................................. 7 1.1. Natural conditions .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.1. Climate and vegetation................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.2. Geological structure and geomorphology ....................................................................................... 8 1.1.3. Surface water resources.................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.3.1. Rivers .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the Senate
    MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE Dear former, current and future students, The Moldova State University is an institution with history and traditions that has succeeded to establish itself as an elite university center. Our multiple educational, research and innovation achievements, aligned to the highest standards, have permanently favored the social, economic and cultural development of the Republic of Moldova. We set ourselves the goal, we succeeded and we always return to the idea of organizing a dynamic and modern educational process. The Moldova State University has the quality of building diligence, and this belief is based on the full potential of the institution: the professorial staff of high academic standing, the didactic support, the technical material background and, especially, the contingent of students with performance aspirations. The students, who studied at the Moldova State University, are aware that the most important contribution is to their own personality, they enjoy the complex and harmonious development of their professional training. Thanks to them, to those who wear the MSU quality emblem, we appreciate today with respect and gratitude the years that have passed and the people who have contributed to writing the history of this institution. The current students of the Moldova State University are to explore with perseverance the professional training process. Our institution continuously promotes critical and creative thinking models in the spirit of flexibility, dedication and seriousness. You are the ones who ensure the prestige of the Moldova State University through a permanent tendency to obtain performance and excellence. Those who will continue to choose to be the part of the family of the Moldova State University, we assure you that you will find in our institution an environment conducive to the development of professional and cultural horizon, a space of intellectual solidarity, dignity and professional performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Exceptional Floods in the Prut Basin, Romania, in the Context of Heavy
    1 Exceptional floods in the Prut basin, Romania, in the context of 2 heavy rains in the summer of 2010 3 4 Gheorghe Romanescu1, Cristian Constantin Stoleriu 5 Alexandru Ioan Cuza, University of Iasi, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Department of 6 Geography, Bd. Carol I, 20 A, 700505 Iasi, Romania 7 8 Abstract. The year 2010 was characterized by devastating flooding in Central and Eastern 9 Europe, including Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. This 10 study focuses on floods that occurred during the summer of 2010 in the Prut River basin, 11 which has a high percentage of hydrotechnical infrastructure. Strong floods occurred in 12 eastern Romania on the Prut River, which borders the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, and 13 the Siret River. Atmospheric instability from 21 June-1 July 2010 caused significant amounts 14 of rain, with rates of 51.2 mm/50 min and 42.0 mm/30 min. In the middle Prut basin, there are 15 numerous ponds that help mitigate floods as well as provide water for animals, irrigation, and 16 so forth. The peak discharge of the Prut River during the summer of 2010 was 2,310 m3/s at 17 the Radauti Prut gauging station. High discharges were also recorded on downstream 18 tributaries, including the Baseu, Jijia, and Miletin. High discharges downstream occurred 19 because of water from the middle basin and the backwater from the Danube (a historic 20 discharge of 16,300 m3/s). The floods that occurred in the Prut basin in the summer of 2010 21 could not be controlled completely because the discharges far exceeded foreseen values.
    [Show full text]
  • Actual Problems of Protection and Sustainable Use of the Animal World Diversity
    ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF MOLDOVA DEPARTMENT OF NATURE AND LIFE SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY Actual problems of protection and sustainable use of ThE animal world diversity International Conference of Zoologists dedicated to the 50th anniversary from the foundation of Institute of Zoology of ASM Chisinau – 2011 ACTUAL PRObLEMS OF PROTECTION AND SUSTAINAbLE USE OF ThE ANIMAL wORLD DIVERSITY Content CZU 59/599:502.74 (082) D 53 Dumitru Murariu. READING ABOUT SPECIES CONCEPT IN BIOLOGY.......................................................................10 Dan Munteanu. AChievements Of Romania in ThE field Of nature The materials of International Conference of Zoologists „Actual problems of protection and protection and implementation Of European Union’S rules concerning ThE biodiversity conservation (1990-2010)...............................................................................11 sustainable use of animal world diversity” organized by the Institute of Zoology of the Aca- demy of Sciences of Moldova in celebration of the 50th anniversary of its foundation are a gene- Laszlo Varadi. ThE protection and sustainable use Of Aquatic resources.....................................13 ralization of the latest scientific researches in the country and abroad concerning the diversity of aquatic and terrestrial animal communities, molecular-genetic methods in systematics, phylo- Terrestrial Vertebrates.................................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • National Human Development Report Republic of Moldova 1995(Link Is
    National Human Development Report Republic of Moldova ( Revised version ) Chisinau, Moldova 1995 FIRST NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNDP MOLDOVA SUSTAINABLE HUMAN SUSTAINABLE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT TEAM ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Winston Temple, Grigory Ojog, Vice Prime Minister Resident Coordinator, Andrei Andriesh, President, Academy of Science of United Nations/Moldova Moldova Sergiu Radautsan, Academy of Science of Moldova Larissa Atamaniuc, Alexandra Roshka, Academy of Science of Moldova NHDR Project Coordinator Sergiu Chirca, Academy of Economic Studies Nadejda Shiskan, Academy of Economic Studies Barbara Brittell, Project Consultant Vladimir Iacovlev, National Institute of Ecology Ion Chebotaru, National Institute of Ecology REPORTS TO THE FIRST NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE HUMAN DEVELOPMANT Eugen Hrischev, Academy of Economic Studies Arcadie Capcelea, Dept. for Environmental Protection Sergiu Chirca, Academy of Economic Studies Anatol Gudym, Ministry of Economy Nicolae Nadejda Shishcan, Academy of Economic Studies Bucum, Ministry of Education Vladimir Gutsu, Andrei Andriesh, Academy of Sciences of Moldova Ministry of Education Victor Chiobanu, Academy of Sciences of Moldova Alexei Rusu, Ministry of Health Eugenia Haralambie Corbu, Academy of Sciences of Moldova Mihailov, Ministry of Labour, Social Protection Sergiu Radautsanu, Academy of Sciences of Moldova and Family Ion Chebotaru, Alexander Roshca, Academy of Sciences of Moldova National Institute of Ecology Alexander Zavtur, Academy of Sciences of Moldova Ion Dediu, National Institute of Ecology Vladimir Iacovlev, Ion Bostan, Chisinau Technical University National Institute of Ecology Comments on this report may be forwarded to the attention of: UNDP Moldova 31 August str., #131 Chisinau, 277012 Republic of Moldova The Government of the Republic of Moldova and the Office of UNDP Moldova sincerely thank the Government of Japan for their financial support for this National Human Development Report initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 41St International Association for Danube Research Conference
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41ST INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR DANUBE RESEARCH CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS SIBIU, ROMANIA, 2016 ~ The 41st International Association for Danube Research (IAD) Conference, Sibiu, Romania, 2016 ~ - Tributaries as key elements in sustainable management of the Danube River basin - Editorial Board • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Angela CURTEAN-BĂNĂDUC, Romania • Dr. Doru BĂNĂDUC, Romania • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Thomas HEIN, IAD, Germany • Dr. Harald KUTZENBERGER, Austria • Prof. Dr. Erika SCHNEIDER-BINDER, Germany Scientific committee • Dr. John AKEROYD, UK • Prof. Dr. Aurel ARDELEAN, Romania • Dr. Grigore BABOIANU, Romania • Prof. Dr. Klaus BATTES, Romania • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Angela BĂNĂDUC, Romania • Dr. Doru BĂNĂDUC, Romania • Prof. Dr. Acad. Árpád BERCZIK, Hungary • Dr. Jürg BLOESCH, Switzerland • Prof. Dr. Marieta COSTACHE, Romania • Prof. Dr. Ion DEDIU, Moldavia • Dr. Mária DINKA, Hungary • Dr. Edith DURISCH-KAISER, Switzerland • Dr. Gábor GUTI, Hungary • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nicolae GĂLDEAN, Romania • Prof. Dr. Stoica GODEANU, Romania • Prof. Dr. Acad. Marian-Traian GOMOIU, Romania • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Thomas HEIN, Germany • Dr. Jan HELESIC, Czech Republic • Prof. Dr. Alois HERZIG, Austria • Prof. Dr. Georg JANAUER, Austria • Dr. Roumen KALCHEV, Bulgaria • Dr. Anita KISS, Hungary • Dr. Harald KUTZENBERGER, Austria • Dr. Milan LEHOTSKY, Slovakia • Dr. Mirjana LENHARDT, Serbia • Dr. Artem LYASHENKO, Ukraine • Dr. Melita MIHALJEVIC, Croatia ~ The 41st International Association for Danube Research (IAD) Conference, Sibiu, Romania, 2016 ~ - Tributaries as key elements in sustainable management of the Danube River basin - • Prof. Dr. Ionel MIRON, Romania • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Laura MOMEU, Romania • Dr. Ion NĂVODARU, Romania • Dr. Gheorghe OAIE, Romania • Dr. Martin PUSCH, Germany • Dr. Snezana RADULOVIC, Serbia • Prof. Dr. Geta RAȘNOVEANU, Romania • Dr. Cristina SANDU, Romania • Dr. Ulrich SCHWARZ, Germany • Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe Disclaimer
    World Small Hydropower Development Report 2019 Europe Disclaimer Copyright © 2019 by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization and the International Center on Small Hydro Power. The World Small Hydropower Development Report 2019 is jointly produced by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) and the International Center on Small Hydro Power (ICSHP) to provide development information about small hydropower. The opinions, statistical data and estimates contained in signed articles are the responsibility of the authors and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or bearing the endorsement of UNIDO or ICSHP. Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information herein, neither UNIDO, its Member States nor ICSHP assume any responsibility for consequences that may arise from the use of the material. This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as ‘developed’, ‘industrialized’ and ‘developing’ are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. This document may be freely quoted or reprinted but acknowledgement is requested.
    [Show full text]
  • (Eni/2016/372-403) the Danube, Prut and Black Sea
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership cOUNTRIES (ENI/2016/372-403) THE DANUBE, PRUT AND BLACK SEA RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN IN REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA for the future planning cycle (2022-2027) TECHNICAL REPORT N°6 ON ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF WATER USE December – 2019 Technical Report N°6 Economical analysis of water use Beneficiaries IWRM department of the MARDE (legislation and supervision), Agency “Apele Moldovei” (Planning coordination and follow up of implementation) Produced by OIKUMENA Public Association Authors Petru Bacal, Iurie Bejan, Vitalie Dilan, Lucia Căpățînă, Nicolae Boboc, Boris Iurciuc, Natalia Zgîrcu Produced for: International Office for Water (France), as contracting authority responsible for RBM planning in EUWI+East member state consortium Supervision Radu Cazacu and Dumitru Proca from Apele Moldovei supported by Pierre Henry de Villeneuve (IOWater) and Victor Bujac (National EUWI+ Project Representative in Moldova) Date December 2019 Version Final Acknowledgements: Apele Romane for offering its support including the direct contribution of Irina Tutunaru from Water Administration Prut – Barlad River Basin, Romania Financed by: European Union Co-financed by: Austrian Development Agency and the Artois-Picardie Water Agency (France) for the implementing Member States Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document, the “TECHNICAL REPORT N°6 ON ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF WATER USE”, was produced by the EU member state consortium with the financial assistance of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1 National Inventory of February 2003
    Support for the Extension of Accident Risk Spots Inventory and Preventive Measures / Final Report Annex 1 National Inventory of February 2003 Support for the Extension of Accident Risk Spots Inventory and Preventive Measures / Final Report 1 Annex 1 A 1.1 OCS in Austria 2 UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project Result of the existing Federal Inventory of Contaminated Sites (FCSI) Austria This inventory was compiled and managed by the Federal Environment Agency of Austria served as the basis for the closer definition of contaminated sites in flooding areas. By 1 July 2002 the FCSI included 164 sites. From these total number those sites were excluded which meet one of the defined exclusion criteria from the expert meeting in 2002. As the result of this exclusion process 29 sites involving a significant high potential of contaminants were retained for the inventory of contaminated sites in flooding areas. However, it has to be taken into account that at some of these sites remediation measures have already been started and the contamination potential will hence decrease significantly in the future. Regular updating of the inventory for contaminated sites in flooding areas should therefore be introduced compulsorily. Bundesland Nummer Bezeichnung Bezirk Gemeinde Art der Altlast Art der Schadstoffe Fläche Volumen Branche Ablagerungs- Ablagerungen /Betriebszeitra um Kärnten K22 Lederfabrik Neuner Klagenfurt Klagenfurt Altstandort Chrom 120000 Lederverarbeitu seit 1922 ng Kärnten K7 Deponie Roßwiese Sankt Veit an Althofen Altablagerung Industriemüll
    [Show full text]
  • National Reviews 1998 Moldova Technical Reports
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 MOLDOVA TECHNICAL REPORTS Part A: Social and Economic Analysis Part B: Financing Mechanisms NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 MOLDOVA TECHNICAL REPORTS Part A: Social and Economic Analysis Part B: Financing Mechanisms NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants.
    [Show full text]