The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics Routledge Companions to Philosophy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics Routledge Companions to Philosophy THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO AESTHETICS ROUTLEDGE COMPANIONS TO PHILOSOPHY Routledge Companions to Philosophy offer thorough, high quality surveys of all the major topics in philosophy. Covering the key problems, themes and thinkers in each topic, all entries are specially commissioned for each volume and written by leading scholars in the field. Clear, accessible and carefully edited and organised, Routledge Companions to Philosophy are indispensable for anyone coming to a major topic in philosophy for the first time as well as the more advanced reader. THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO AESTHETICS Edited by Berys Gaut and Dominic McIver Lopes London and New York First published 2001 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” © 2001 Berys Gaut and Dominic McIver Lopes for selection and editorial matter; individual contributors, their contributions. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested. ISBN 0-203-99192-3 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-415-20737-1 (Print Edition) CONTENTS List of figures ix Notes on contributors x Preface xvi PART 1 History of aesthetics 1 1 Plato 3 CHRISTOPHER JANAWAY 2 Aristotle 15 NICKOLAS PAPPAS 3 Medieval aesthetics 27 JOSEPH MARGOLIS 4 Empiricism: Hutcheson and Hume 37 JAMES SHELLEY 5 Kant 51 DONALD W. CRAWFORD 6 Hegel 65 MICHAEL INWOOD 7 Nietzsche 75 RUBEN BERRIOS AND AARON RIDLEY 8 Formalism 87 NOËL CARROLL 9 Pragmatism: Dewey 97 RICHARD SHUSTERMAN v CONTENTS 10 Heidegger 107 SIMON GLENDINNING 11 Expressivism: Croce and Collingwood 119 GORDON GRAHAM 12 Sibley 131 COLIN LYAS 13 Foucault 143 ROBERT WICKS 14 Postmodernism: Barthes and Derrida 155 DAVID NOVITZ PART 2 Aesthetic theory 167 15 Definitions of art 169 STEPHEN DAVIES 16 The aesthetic 181 ALAN GOLDMAN 17 Taste 193 CAROLYN KORSMEYER 18 Aesthetic universals 203 DENIS DUTTON 19 Value of art 215 MATTHEW KIERAN 20 Beauty 227 JENNIFER ANNE MCMAHON 21 Interpretation 239 ROBERT STECKER 22 Imagination and make-believe 253 GREGORY CURRIE 23 Fiction 263 DAVID DAVIES 24 Narrative 275 PAISLEY LIVINGSTON vi CONTENTS 25 Metaphor 285 GARRY L. HAGBERG 26 Pictorial representation 297 MARK ROLLINS PART 3 Issues and challenges 313 27 Criticism 315 ROGER SEAMON 28 Art and knowledge 329 EILEEN JOHN 29 Art and ethics 341 BERYS GAUT 30 Art, expression, and emotion 353 DEREK MATRAVERS 31 Tragedy 363 ALEX NEILL 32 Humor 375 TED COHEN 33 Authenticity in performance 383 JAMES O. YOUNG 34 Fakes and forgeries 395 NAN STALNAKER 35 High art versus low art 409 JOHN A. FISHER 36 Environmental aesthetics 423 ALLEN CARLSON 37 Feminist aesthetics 437 SARAH WORTH vii CONTENTS PART 4 The individual arts 447 38 Literature 449 PETER LAMARQUE 39 Film 463 MURRAY SMITH 40 Photography 477 PATRICK MAYNARD 41 Painting 491 DOMINIC MCIVER LOPES 42 Sculpture 503 CURTIS L. CARTER 43 Architecture 519 EDWARD WINTERS 44 Music 531 MARK DEBELLIS 45 Dance 545 GRAHAM MCFEE 46 Theater 557 JAMES R. HAMILTON Index 569 viii FIGURES 26.1 Picasso’s Rite of Spring shows how shape information is contained in silhouettes 301 26.2 The organization of stored shape descriptions for bipeds and quadrupeds 301 26.3 Birds and Schema by Van de Passe 306 26.4 Size constancy as a function of the number of textural elements covered by an object where it touches the ground 309 41.1 The duck–rabbit illustration 498 44.1 Short passage from Handel’s Messiah 533 ix CONTRIBUTORS Ruben Berrios is currently completing a doctorate on Nietzsche’s aesthetics at the University of Southampton. Allen Carlson is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. His research interests include aesthetics, environmental philosophy, and especially environmental and landscape aesthetics. In this area, he has pub- lished a number of articles and co-edited two collections of essays. Noël Carroll is Monroe C. Beardsley Professor of Philosophy at the University of Wisconsin, USA. He is the author of several books and articles in aesthetics, including, most recently A Philosophy of Mass Art and an Introduction to Aesthetics. Curtis L. Carter is Director of the Haggerty Museum of Art and Professor of Aesthetics at Marquette University, Wisconsin, USA. His publications include catalogues and essays on the visual arts, the museum and dance. He has con- tributed to the Encyclopedia of Aesthetics and the International Encyclopedia of Dance. Ted Cohen is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Chicago, USA, and past president of the American Society for Aesthetics. He is a co-editor of Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics and his most recent book is Jokes: Philosophical Thoughts on Joking Matters. Donald W. Crawford is Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Santa Barbara, USA. He is the author of Kant’s Aesthetic Theory and numer- ous articles on Kant and aesthetics. He is also a past editor of the Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Gregory Currie is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Nottingham, England. His most recent book is Image and Mind: Philosophy, Film and Cognitive Science. He is currently working on a book on the imagination. x CONTRIBUTORS David Davies is Associate Professor of Philosophy at McGill University, Canada. In addition to his work in aesthetics, he works in the philosophies of mind and language, and analytic metaphysics. He is completing a manuscript on the ontological status of the work of art. Stephen Davies, a member of Department of Philosophy, University of Auckland, New Zealand is the author of Definitions of Art and Musical Meaning and Expression, and the editor of Art and its Messages. He has also published many articles on the philosophy of art. Mark DeBellis is Associate Professor of Music at Columbia University, USA. His interests include the philosophy of music perception and cognition, the rela- tionship of analysis to listening, and Verdi. He is the author of Music and Conceptualization. Denis Dutton teaches philosophy of art at the University of Canterbury, New Zealand. He edits Philosophy and Literature and the Arts and Letters Daily website. He has lived in India and studied the sitar under Pandarung Parate, and has done fieldwork on wood carvers of the Sepik River region of New Guinea. John A. Fisher is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Colorado at Boulder. He is the author of Reflecting on Art and articles on various aesthetic themes, including rock music, the ontology of recordings, technology’s effect on appreciation and the aesthetics of nature. Berys Gaut teaches in the Department of Moral Philosophy, University of St Andrews, Scotland. He is the author of many articles on aesthetics, film the- ory, moral philosophy, and Kant. He is currently working on a book on art and ethics. Simon Glendinning is Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Reading, England. He is the author of On Being with Others: Heidegger – Derrida – Wittgenstein and General Editor of The Edinburgh Encyclopedia of Continental Philosophy. He has written on Heidegger’s conception of animal life and of the end of philosophy. Alan Goldman is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Miami, USA. He is the author of five books, including Aesthetic Value, Moral Knowledge and Empirical Knowledge, and of articles on aesthetics, ethics and epistemology. Gordon Graham is Regius Professor of Moral Philosophy at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland, and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. He has writ- ten extensively on topics in aesthetics and is the author of Philosophy of the Arts. xi CONTRIBUTORS Garry L. Hagberg is Professor of Philosophy at Bard College, and the author of Meaning and Interpretation: Wittgenstein, Henry James and Literary Knowledge, Art as Language: Wittgenstein, Meaning and Aesthetic Theory, and numerous essays and reviews. James R. Hamilton teaches philosophy at Kansas State University, USA. He has published essays on theater and other performing arts in the Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, the Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism, and the British Journal of Aesthetics. Michael Inwood is Fellow and Tutor in Philosophy at Trinity College, Oxford, England. In addition to several publications on Hegel, he is also the author of Heidegger and A Heidegger Dictionary. Christopher Janaway is Reader in Philosophy at Birkbeck College, University of London, England. His publications include Images of Excellence: Plato’s Critique of the Arts, Self and World in Schopenhauer’s Philosophy, Schopenhauer and a number of articles on aesthetics. Eileen John is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA. Her research concerns learning experiences with fiction. Her work has appeared in the Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Philosophy and Literature, and the Henry James Review. Matthew Kieran is Lecturer in the School of Philosophy of the University of Leeds, England. He has published articles on aesthetics, ethics and social phi- losophy as well as a monograph and an edited collection on media ethics. Carolyn Korsmeyer is Professor of Philosophy at the State University of New York at Buffalo, USA.
Recommended publications
  • Walter Pater's Aesthetic Historicism
    Transfigured World · CAROLYN WILLIAMS · Transfigured World · WALTER PATER'S AESTHETIC HISTORICISM · Cornell University Press ITHACA AND LONDON Copyright © 1989 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850, or visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. First published 1989 by Cornell University Press. First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2016. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Williams, Carolyn, 1950– Transfigured world: Walter Pater’s aesthetic historicism / Carolyn Williams p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 978-0-8014-2151-8 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-5017-0724-7 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Pater, Walter, 1839–1894—Aesthetics. 2. Pater, Walter, 1839–1894— Knowledge—History. 3. Historicism. I. Title. PR5138.A35W5 1989 824'.8—dc20 89-42883 The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ For Cecil Lang Contents Acknowledgments ix Abbreviations xi Introduction I Part One • Opening Conclusions II I. "That Which Is Without" 14 2. "The Inward World of Thought and Feeling" 18 3. Aestheticism 26 4. Answerable Style 37 5. Iiistoricism 46 6. Aesthetic Iiistoricism and "Aesthetic Poetry" 57 7. The Poetics of Revival 68 Part Two • Figural Strategies in Th e Renaissance 79 I. Legend and Iiistoricity 82 2. Myths of Iiistory: Th e Last Supper 94 3. The Iiistoricity of Myth 103 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Schroeder [email protected] 3709 Trousdale Parkway Markschroeder.Net
    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ USC School of Philosophy 323.632.8757 (mobile) Mudd Hall of Philosophy Mark Schroeder [email protected] 3709 Trousdale Parkway markschroeder.net Los Angeles, CA 90089-0451 Curriculum Vitae philosophy.academy ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EDUCATION Ph.D., Philosophy, Princeton University, November 2004, supervised by Gideon Rosen M.A., Philosophy, Princeton University, November 2002 B.A., magna cum laude, Philosophy, Mathematics, and Economics, Carleton College, June 2000 EMPLOYMENT University of Southern California, Professor since December 2011 previously Assistant Professor 8/06 – 4/08, Associate Professor with tenure 4/08 – 12/11 University of Maryland at College Park, Instructor 8/04 – 1/05, Assistant Professor 1/05 – 6/06 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ RESEARCH INTERESTS My research has focused primarily on metaethics, practical reason, and related areas, particularly including normative ethics, philosophy of language, epistemology, philosophy of mind, metaphysics, the philosophy of action, agency, and responsibility, and the history of ethics. HONORS AND AWARDS Elected to USC chapter of Phi Kappa Phi, 2020; 2017 Phi Kappa Phi Faculty
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Cultural Value in the Historical Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu Tony Bennett
    The Historical Universal: The Role of Cultural Value in the Historical Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu Tony Bennett The definitive version of this article is published in: Bennet, T. 2005, ‘The Historical Universal: The Role of Cultural Value in the Historical Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu’, The British Journal of Sociology, 56(1): 141-164. The definitive version of this article is published in: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00051.x/abstract (institutional or subscribed access may be required) The journal British Journal of Sociology is available online: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1468-4446 (institutional or subscribed access may be required) Copyright remains with the publisher, Blackwell Publishing. Disclaimer Please note that this is an electronic, pre-print version of this article produced by the Institute for Culture & Society, University of Western Sydney, in accordance with the requirements of the publisher. Whilst this version of the article incorporates refereed changes and has been accepted for publication, differences may exist between this and the final, published version. Citations should only be made from the published version. User Agreement Copyright of these pre-print articles are retained by the author. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article to facilitate their own study or non-commercial research. Wider circulation and distribution of the material and/or use of it in profit-making activities is prohibited. URLs to access this pre-print version can
    [Show full text]
  • The John U. Nef Committee on Social Thought 1
    The John U. Nef Committee on Social Thought 1 The John U. Nef Committee on Social Thought Department Website: http://socialthought.uchicago.edu Chair • Robert Pippin Professors • Lorraine Daston • Wendy Doniger • Joel Isaac • Hans Joas • Gabriel Lear • Jonathan Lear • Jonathan Levy • Jean Luc Marion • Heinrich Meier • Glenn W. Most • David Nirenberg • Thomas Pavel • Mark Payne • Robert B. Pippin • Jennifer Pitts • Andrei Pop • Haun Saussy • Laura Slatkin • Nathan Tarcov • Rosanna Warren • David Wellbery Emeriti • Wendy Doniger • Leon Kass • Joel Kraemer • Ralph Lerner • James M. Redfield • David Tracy About the Committee The John U. Nef Committee on Social Thought was established as a degree granting body in 1941 by the historian John U. Nef (1899-1988), with the assistance of the economist Frank Knight, the anthropologist Robert Redfield, and Robert M. Hutchins, then President of the University. The Committee is a group of diverse scholars sharing a common concern for the unity of the human sciences. Their premises were that the serious study of any academic topic, or of any philosophical or literary work, is best prepared for by a wide and deep acquaintance with the fundamental issues presupposed in all such studies, that students should learn about these issues by acquainting themselves with a select number of classic ancient and modern texts in an inter- disciplinary atmosphere, and should only then concentrate on a specific dissertation topic. It accepts qualified graduate students seeking to pursue their particular studies within this broader context, and aims both to teach precision of scholarship and to foster awareness of the permanent questions at the origin of all learned inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unlimited Responsibility of Spilling Ink Marko Zlomislic
    ISSN 1393-614X Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 11 (2007): 128-152 ____________________________________________________ The Unlimited Responsibility of Spilling Ink Marko Zlomislic Abstract In order to show that both Derrida’s epistemology and his ethics can be understood in terms of his logic of writing and giving, I consider his conversation with Searle in Limited Inc. I bring out how a deconstruction that is implied by the dissemination of writing and giving makes a difference that accounts for the creative and responsible decisions that undecidability makes possible. Limited Inc has four parts and I will interpret it in terms of the four main concepts of Derrida. I will relate signature, event, context to Derrida’s notion of dissemination and show how he differs from Austin and Searle concerning the notion of the signature of the one who writes and gives. Next, I will show how in his reply to Derrida, entitled, “Reiterating the Differences”, Searle overlooks Derrida’s thought about the communication of intended meaning that has to do with Derrida’s distinction between force and meaning and his notion of differance. Here I will show that Searle cannot even follow his own criteria for doing philosophy. Then by looking at Limited Inc, I show how Derrida differs from Searle because repeatability is alterability. Derrida has an ethical intent all along to show that it is the ethos of alterity that is called forth by responsibility and accounted for by dissemination and difference. Of course, comments on comments, criticisms of criticisms, are subject to the law of diminishing fleas, but I think there are here some misconceptions still to be cleared up, some of which seem to still be prevalent in generally sensible quarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Configuring a Scatological Gaze in Trash Filmmaking Zoe Gross
    Excremental Ecstasy, Divine Defecation and Revolting Reception: Configuring a Scatological Gaze in Trash Filmmaking Zoe Gross Scatology, for all the sordid formidability the term evokes, is not an es- pecially novel or unusual theme, stylistic technique or descriptor in film or filmic reception. Shit happens – to emphasise both the banality and perva- siveness of the cliché itself – on multiple levels of textuality, manifesting it- self in both the content and aesthetic of cinematic texts, and the ways we respond to them. We often refer to “shit films,” using an excremental vo- cabulary redolent of detritus, malaise and uncleanliness to denote their otherness and “badness”. That is, films of questionable taste, aesthetics, or value, are frequently delineated and defined by the defecatory: we describe them as “trash”, “crap”, “filth”, “sewerage”, “shithouse”. When considering cinematic purviews such as the b-film, exploitation, and shock or trash filmmaking, whose narratives are so often played out on the site of the gro- tesque body, a screenscape spectacularly splattered with bodily excess and waste is de rigeur. Here, the scatological is both often on blatant dis- play – shit is ejected, consumed, smeared, slung – and underpining or tinc- turing form and style, imbuing the text with a “shitty” aesthetic. In these kinds of films – which, as their various appellations tend to suggest, are de- fined themselves by their association with marginality, excess and trash, the underground, and the illicit – the abject body and its excretia not only act as a dominant visual landscape, but provide a kind of somatic, faecal COLLOQUY text theory critique 18 (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • MDMA and Sexual Behavior
    Note: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Substance Use & Misuse following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [McElrath K (2005) MDMA and sexual behavior: ecstasy users’ perceptions about sexuality and sexual risk, Substance Use & Misuse, 40:9, 1461-1477] is available online at http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=g714012467 MDMA and Sexual Behavior: Ecstasy Users’ Perceptions About Sexuality and Sexual Risk KAREN MCELRATH School of Sociology and Social Policy, Belfast, Ireland Published in Substance Use & Misuse,(2005) 40:9,1461—1477 This study examines the relationship between MDMA (Ecstasy), sexual behavior, and sexual risk taking. The sample consisted of 98 current and former users of MDMA. Several strategies were utilized to recruit respondents and data were collected through in-depth interviews during 1997 and 1998. The majority of respondents had used MDMA during the 6-month period prior to the interview and a large percentage had consumed the drug on 100 occasions or more. Most respondents reported feelings of emotional closeness while consuming MDMA but without the desire for penetrative sex. Others, however, reported that MDMA increased sexual arousal and some respondents (in particular gay and bisexual females) had used MDMA specifically for sexual enhancement. Sexual risk taking (e.g., having multiple partners, engaging in sex without a condom) was prevalent among respondents who did engage in sexual activity during MDMA episodes. Explanations for the findings are offered and implications for prevention/intervention are discussed. Keywords MDMA; ecstasy; sexual behavior Introduction Although a patent for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) was issued in 1914 (Shulgin, 1986), “recreational”a use of the drug did not surface until the 1970s and 1980s, and for the most part was restricted to selected regions in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Heroic Individualism: the Hero As Author in Democratic Culture Alan I
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Heroic individualism: the hero as author in democratic culture Alan I. Baily Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Baily, Alan I., "Heroic individualism: the hero as author in democratic culture" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1073. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1073 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. HEROIC INDIVIDUALISM: THE HERO AS AUTHOR IN DEMOCRATIC CULTURE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Alan I. Baily B.S., Texas A&M University—Commerce, 1999 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2003 December, 2006 It has been well said that the highest aim in education is analogous to the highest aim in mathematics, namely, to obtain not results but powers , not particular solutions but the means by which endless solutions may be wrought. He is the most effective educator who aims less at perfecting specific acquirements that at producing that mental condition which renders acquirements easy, and leads to their useful application; who does not seek to make his pupils moral by enjoining particular courses of action, but by bringing into activity the feelings and sympathies that must issue in noble action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aesthetics of Frustration: Diversity and the ASA
    The Aesthetics of Frustration: Diversity and the ASA Sherri Irvin University of Oklahoma As I began to write a more standard aesthetics paper on an entirely different topic, my thoughts turned to several episodes in which scholars of color presented their work at ASA meetings with recep- tions ranging from chilly to hostile. Some have stated that they will not likely return to the ASA due to these experiences. Because I be- lieve the resources of aesthetics can shed considerable light on social and political dynamics, I will examine some aesthetic elements of this situation and use them to inform a schematic proposal about how we might move forward. I don’t have the answers—finding them is not a task for one person, and scholars belonging to the communities that have been margin- alized and excluded in our professional spaces must be centrally involved. But serious discussion of these matters, which have been personally and professionally painful for me and far more so for THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR AESTHETICS: others, is badly needed, and I hope this contribution will renew a AN ASSOCIATION FOR AESTHETICS, discussion that was engaged by A.W. Eaton, Charles Peterson, and CRITICISM, AND THEORY OF THE ARTS Paul C. Taylor in the Aesthetics for Birds blog in late 2017. 1. VOLUME 41 NUMBER 2 SUMMER 2021 In 2010, the distinguished legal scholar and Yavapai Supreme Court justice Rebecca Tsosie was plenary speaker at the ASA annual meet- ing. I was struck not only by the critical Indigenous perspective she 1 The Aesthetics of Frustration: Diversity and brought to her discussion of the collection of Native American cul- the ASA tural objects in non-Native museums, but also by her gender pre- by Sherri Irvin sentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter the Great and His Changing Identity Emily Frances Pagrabs Wofford College
    Wofford College Digital Commons @ Wofford Student Scholarship 5-2016 Peter the Great and His Changing Identity Emily Frances Pagrabs Wofford College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wofford.edu/studentpubs Part of the European History Commons, and the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Pagrabs, Emily Frances, "Peter the Great and His Changing Identity" (2016). Student Scholarship. Paper 17. http://digitalcommons.wofford.edu/studentpubs/17 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Wofford. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Wofford. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Peter the Great and His Changing Identity Senior History Honors Thesis May 11, 2016 Emiley Pagrabs Pagrabs 1 Introduction Well aware of the perception that foreigners held of him, Peter the Great would never apologize for his nationality or his country. A product of his upbringing, Peter did have some qualities that many foreigners criticized as barbaric and harsh. Said Peter: They say that I am cruel; that is what foreigners think of me, but who are they to judge? They do not know what the situation was at the beginning of my reign, and how many were opposed to my plans, and brought about the failure of projects which would have been of great benefit to my country obliging me to arm myself with great severity; but I have never been cruel…I have always asked for the cooperation of those of my subjects in whom I have perceived intelligence and patriotism, and who, agreeing with my views, were ready to support them.1 Essentially, Peter I was simply a Russian.
    [Show full text]
  • IV. Concerning the Relation of Mind and Medium in Aesthetic Appre- Ciation Little Need Be Said
    MIND AND MEDIUM IN ARTf. (1V.j BY EDWARD BULLOUGH. I AGREE with Mr Walkley’s criticism of Mr Marriott’s proposal to base an aesthetic theory upon Medium and its technical manipulation. The attempt has been made more than once-the example of Semper has been mentioned by Mr Watt-and has always broken down in the face of objections such as are urged by Mr Walkley-in the last resort because Art is a manifestation of mind and cannot be satisfactorily accounted for by the nature and treatment of the material it employs. The second part of Mr Walkley’s paper rests upon the theory of Benedetto Croce. I am in doubt how far I agree or disagree with him. Croce’s aesthetic theory does not stand by itself, as is far too commonly supposed. It is part of a general philosophical, and in addition monistic, system and is exposed to all the difficulties created by such a depen- dence. I feel doubt about the fourfold division of the activities of the spirit; about the precise limits of the theoretical and practical activities; about the ultimate implications of his general point of view; as regards the aesthetic sphere in particular, about the nature of the ‘intuition’ and the essential ‘lyricism’ of Art, and their consequences. Indeed, I am inclined to agree with the objections recently urged by G. A. Borgese in the Preface to the new edition of his Storia della critica romantica in Italia2. I readily admit that Croce’s conception of intuition as the A contribution to the Symposium presented at the Congress of Philosophy in Oxford, 24-27 September, 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspen Ideas Festival Confirmed Speakers
    Aspen Ideas Festival Confirmed Speakers Carol Adelman , President, Movers and Shakespeares; Senior Fellow and Director, Center for Global Prosperity, The Hudson Institute Kenneth Adelman , Vice President, Movers and Shakespeares; Executive Director, Arts & Ideas Series, The Aspen Institute Stephen J. Adler , Editor-in-Chief, BusinessWeek Pamela A. Aguilar , Producer, Documentary Filmmaker; After Brown , Shut Up and Sing Madeleine K. Albright , founder, The Albright Group, LLC; former US Secretary of State; Trustee, The Aspen Institute T. Alexander Aleinikoff , Professor of Law and Dean, Georgetown University Law Center Elizabeth Alexander , Poet; Professor and Chair, African American Studies Department, Yale University Yousef Al Otaiba , United Arab Emirates Ambassador to the United States Kurt Andersen , Writer, Broadcaster, Editor; Host and Co-Creator, Public Radio International’s “Studio 360” Paula S. Apsell , Senior Executive Producer, PBS’s “NOVA” Anders Åslund , Senior Fellow, Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics Byron Auguste , Senior Partner, Worldwide Managing Director, Social Sector Office, McKinsey & Company Dean Baker , Co-Director, Center for Economic and Policy Research; Columnist, The Guardian ; Blogger, “Beat the Press,” The American Prospect James A. Baker III , Senior Partner, Baker Botts, LLP; former US Secretary of State Bharat Balasubramanian , Vice President, Group Research and Advanced Engineering; Product Innovations & Process Technologies, Daimler AG Jack M. Balkin , Knight Professor of Constitutional
    [Show full text]