Human Machine Interface Systems for Cockpits in Rail Applications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Technical Article Human Machine Interface Systems for Cockpits in Rail Applications Rolling stock for passenger, freight, and EMU Fleet disposals and replacements switching duty are complex electrome- The rail market is experiencing a growth Availability of financing chanical systems. Control areas in Loco- phase after weathering the global eco- motives, Electric Multiple Units (EMUs), nomic recession with limited damage. This Competition Diesel Multiple Units (DMUs), Light Rail, is likely due to the long lead times and The United States is the most important and Streetcars can be referred to as the bidding processes for projects around the North American market for EMUs with cab, cockpit, driver or operator compart- world. In addition, growing economies in more than 90% of the total installed base. ment, control desk, driver area, control China, India, and Brazil, which fared well Because of the Buy American Act, many cab, or hostler panel (a hostler panel during recent years, are modernizing their international companies have production controls railway cars in maintenance yards rail infrastructures. 85% of the market operations located in the U.S. Procure- during coupling and uncoupling opera- volume is attributed to EMUs, with most ment programs to replace aging fleets are tions, and provides manual operation in operated in Japan, the UK, Germany, expected to continue for the long term. case of an emergency on the main line). France, and Italy, as well as the United A typical control panel generates infor- States. The leaders in the manufacture DMU mation on the availability and status of a and sale of EMUs are Bombardier, Hitachi, Worldwide deliveries of DMUs have variety of critical subsystems. How control Kawasaki, Tokyo Car, Nippon Sharyo, decreased over the past five years. Top cab personnel interact with and respond Alstom, Stadler, Siemens, Hyundai Rotem, manufacturers include Bombardier, to this information affects the efficiency, CAF, and AnsaldoBreda. Market drivers Alstom, and Siemens. The top market safety, and reliability of rolling stock, with include: drivers for DMUs include: potentially significant impacts on uptime Demand for mobility in urban areas Replacement of locomotives with DMUs availability and operating costs. Infrastructure development in Western Europe and Asia; www.eao.com The two most important factors are working conditions and the incorporation of informa- tion technology into a clear and easy-to-use Human Machine Interface—Conclusion by the Federal Rail Authority. “One clear contributor to a locomotive over its lifetime. assuring locomotive perfor- These clearly are investments mance and safety is the that require constant attention attention the industry has given to achieve optimum perfor- to human factors in the design mance and service life. and evaluation of new and existing rail cabs.” To meet safety and perfor- mance objectives, crews need “In Europe the UIC Leaflet to be assured that locomo- 612-0 has defined the driver/ tives, EMUs, and DMUs are in machine interface for electric proper working order before and diesel multiple units, leaving the yard and while in locomotives, and driving operation. One clear contribu- trailers as functional and tor to assuring locomotive system requirements for a performance and safety is the driver’s cab to be understood attention the industry has given and executed as a harmonised to human factors in the design human/machine interface.” and evaluation of new and The design of an effective HMI cockpit system begins with the definition of existing rail cabs. The need for the designer, operator, and passenger. improvement has been closely examined by the Federal Demand for mobility with increasing passenger volumes; Railroad Administration (FRA) Vehicle operation must comply with new, strict environmental in its assessment of standards standards; developed by the Association Increasing competition. of American Railroads on crash-worthiness and working Funding for rail projects in North America was $7.28 billion in conditions that affect safety 2009, and an additional $10.5 billion in 2010, as well as the recent and productivity. announcement of an additional $8 billion in funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Much of this expendi- The FRA’s conclusion is that ture will be dedicated to infrastructure and controls, but will most the two most important factors certainly lead to purchases of rolling stock and an increase in are working conditions and the New Start Funding. U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood incorporation of information has already announced $1.58 billion for 28 public transit items. technology into a clear and Rail transit projects account for 16 items with more than $1.33 easy-to-use Human Machine billion in funding. For instance, in early 2010, AMTRAK stated it Interface. plans to invest approximately $11 billion over the next 14 years (starting in 2009) on 780 single level cars, 420 bi-level cars, 70 In addition to the FRA conclu- electric locomotives, 264 diesel locomotives and 25 high speed sions, in Europe the UIC Leaflet train sets. Its plans for a 15 to 30 year timetable were similarly 612-0 has defined the driver/ aggressive. machine interface for electric and diesel multiple units, To operate trains more efficiently and contain sky-rocketing locomotives, and driving operational costs, railroad managers are making use of HMI trailers as functional and Systems that increase productivity. New locomotives, EMUs, and system requirements for a DMUs cost $1.75 million or more and have a life expectancy of driver’s cab to be understood about 30 years, while maintenance costs can range from $35,000 and executed as a harmonized to as high as $100,000 a year. Normal maintenance costs plus human/machine interface. repair or replacement of failed parts may exceed the initial cost of www.eao.com . 2 There are several factors in the rail industry that will increase the demand for new and im- proved cab control HMI Systems—Safety and standardisation are among the most important. “Design engineers working on Regulatory influences from rolling stock applications are the FRA, UIC and other developing modular HMI bodies; Systems with easily recognisa- Easy connection with ble colours, symbols, group- existing wiring harnesses. ings, and orientation to increase efficiency and According to studies undertak- improve workflow and produc- en by the FRA, train control tivity.” systems that have been designed with human-centred “The PTC deadline of Decem- design principles in mind (i.e. ber 15, 2015, is one of factors systems that keep human driving trend towards HMI operators as the central active Systems that are both easier to component in the system), are use and understand and, at the more likely to result in im- same time, capable of more proved safety. As increased sophisticated control.” automation of systems and Modular HMI Systems can drop-in can be dropped in to existing cut-outs controls continues with during a rail refurbishment project. initiatives like PTC, hu- man-centred design features Trends in HMI Systems for driver compartment controls become more important. One There are several factors in the rail industry that will increase the of the goals for the FRA is to demand for new and improved cab control HMI Systems. These ensure that the HMI Systems in include: the cab keep the operator Political pressure to develop high speed rail lines with improve- engaged. ments to certain corridors across the country; Standardization is moving closer to being mandatory; Design considerations Buy American will encourage purchases from domestic The design of an effective HMI suppliers; cockpit system begins with the Green initiatives will promote trains that are more fuel efficient; definition of the designer, Safety improvements through better control systems, including operator, and passenger. While technologies such as Positive Train Control (PTC) systems that the HMI system designer must require advanced HMI Systems and communications. keep aesthetics, functionality, ergonomics and safety in mind, Lines that carry passenger rail or toxicby-inhalation (TIH) they also need to understand materials have a PTC deadline of December 31, 2015. These how they are different for each factors are also driving industry trends toward HMI Systems that user. While the designer are both easier to use and understand and, at the same time, receives specific information capable of more sophisticated control. on the system or subsystem for an application, the operator is Trends in cockpit control include: waiting to receive information Exacting ergonomic standards for control systems and from the system to perform an switching; operation, from driving the Increased use of display technology for visualization and train, to maintenance, to repair control; of the system. According to the Alarm and status signals/indicators that are integrated; FRA, the overriding design Efficient system indicator panels with rapid push-to-test; concern is to keep the operator Modular design to save money and speed-up replacement; from becoming a passive High reliability components; participant. A passive operator www.eao.com . 3 Time is of the essence for retrofit projects. Replacing rocker switches with modern flush-mounted push-buttons in the operator control console is a quick HMI solution with significant advantages. “The cab interior design layout The HMI System must promote is specified to accommodate operator action to maintain operators in the range of the awareness and engagement U.S. 95th percentile for males with the system. The operator (six feet, one inch tall) and U.S. is required to perform actions 5th percentile for females (five from time-to-time as an feet tall).” indication that he/she and the system are in good status and “The HMI System will also offer ready mode. The HMI System advance warning as a means of therefore needs to operate preventing operator overreac- under a management-by-con- tion in an emergency. This sent versus manage- warning assistance is most ment-by-exception guideline.
Recommended publications
  • Bullets and Trains: Exporting Japan's Shinkansen to China and Taiwan

    Bullets and Trains: Exporting Japan's Shinkansen to China and Taiwan

    Volume 5 | Issue 3 | Article ID 2367 | Mar 01, 2007 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Bullets and Trains: Exporting Japan's Shinkansen to China and Taiwan Christopher P. Hood Bullets and Trains: ExportingJapan ’s Japan, like many other countries has a de facto Shinkansen to China and Taiwan two-China policy with formal recognition of the People’s Republic but extensive economic and By Christopher P. Hood other ties with the Republic. One example of this dual policy is the use of Haneda Airport by China Airlines (Taiwan), but the use of Narita It is over forty years since the Shinkansen Airport by airlines from China. (‘bullet train’) began operating between Tokyo and Osaka. Since then the network has The Shinkansen expanded, but other countries, most notably France and Germany, have been developing The Shinkansen is one ofJapan ’s iconic their own high speed railways, too. As other symbols. The image ofMount Fuji with a countries, mainly in Asia, look to develop high passing Shinkansen is one of the most speed railways, the battle over which country projected images of Japan. The history of the will win the lucrative contracts for them is on. Shinkansen dates back to the Pacific War. It is not only a matter of railway technology. Shima Yasujiro’s plan for thedangan ressha Political, economic & cultural influences are (‘bullet train’) then included the idea of a line also at stake. This paper will look at these linking Tokyo with Korea and China (1). various aspects in relation to the export of the Although that plan never materialised, the Shinkansen to China in light of previous Shinkansen idea was reborn nearly two Japanese attempts to export the Shinkansen decades later, as yume-no-chotokkyu (‘super and the situation in Taiwan.
  • Company Information PDF(3.9MB)

    Company Information PDF(3.9MB)

    :HDLPWREHDZDUPKHDUWHGFRPSDQ\ ZKLFKFRQWULEXWHFRQWLQXRXVO\ WRDFRPIRUWDEOHOLIHRIKXPDQEHLQJV DQGWKHVRFLHW\ &RPSDQ\3KLORVRSK\ :HGHYRWHRXUVHOIVROHO\WRRXUEHOLHI ³7RSURGXFHWKHVHDWVZKLFKFDQVDWLVI\FXVWRPHUV¶UHTXLUHPHQWV´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he board Organization of directors President The board of corporate officers Design / Manufacture Salesand General Affairs Section Development / Purchasing Quality Section Section Head Sales Group of Accounting Quarters Research & Automobile Group Development Group SHONAN Plant Purchasing General Affairs Team of Group Design Automobile KYUSHU Group Plant Sales Group of Quality Railway / Ship Technical Control Manufacturing Group Group Purchasing
  • FY2010.3 Semi-Annual Investors Meeting(Presentation Handout)

    FY2010.3 Semi-Annual Investors Meeting(Presentation Handout)

    Central Japan Railway Company Semi-Annual Investors Meeting FY2010.3 (Fiscal Year ending March 31,2010) Oct. 29th, 2009 1 Semi-Annual Investors Meeting for FY2010.3 1. Financial results for the 1st half of FY2010.3 and performance forecast for FY2010.3 ①Summary of financial results for the 1st half of FY2010.3 ②Current state of Tokaido Shinkansen passenger volume ③Future plans ④Points for modifying performance forecast for FY2010.3 2. Policy review and future policy development ①Key policies for improving Shinkansen Service ②Introduction results of Series N700 rolling stock and increasing the number of direct services to the Sanyo Shinkansen ③Usage status of Express Reservation Service and expansion of TOICA Service ④Progress of the Tokaido Shinkansen Bypass Project 2 1.Financial Results for the 1st half of FY2010.3 and Performance Forecast for FY2010.3 3 Summary of Financial Results for the 1st half of FY2010.3 (Consolidated) (billions of yen) The 1st half of The 1st half of Breakdown of the 1st half of FY 2010.3 (Apr.-Sep.) Increase/ FY2009.3 FY2010.3 Decrease ** Apr.-Jun. Jul.-Sep. (Apr.-Sep.) (Apr.-Sep.) B-A A B Inc./Dec.** Inc./Dec.** Operating Revenues 772.9 730.6 △42.3 346.3 △ 33.5 384.3 △ 8.8 (Transportation Revenues)* (598.0) (533.8) (△64.1) (253.9) (△39.6) (279.8) (△24.5) Operating Expenses 531.5 554.1 22.6 265.5 10.6 288.5 11.9 Operating Income 241.4 176.4 △65.0 80.7 △ 44.1 95.7 △ 20.8 Non-operating Revenues 1.7 8.6 and Expenses (net) △68.7 △58.3 10.4 △ 28.8 △ 29.5 Ordinary Income 172.6 118.1 △54.5 51.9 △ 42.4 66.2 △ 12.1 Net Income 102.6 69.6 △32.9 30.8 △ 24.7 38.8 △ 8.2 * The numbers in parenthesis are for transportation revenues of JR Central.
  • JR Central's History

    JR Central's History

    Business Strategy Special Feature ESG Activity Report Financial Information Corporate Data JR Central’s History 2020 2015 Business Strategy 2020 Put N700S into Increase of the maximum speed to 285 km/h commercial service “12 Nozomi Timetable” 2014年 JR Central’s History 2003 “10 Nozomi Timetable” 1,844.6 ●Shinagawa station is opened 1,822.0 Since its establishment, the JR Central Group has worked to improve its transportation ●Maximum speed of all Tokaido Shinkansen 1,738.4 services and increase revenues placing top priority on safety, while at the same time working trains increases to 270 km/h 2013 ● Shift to train scheduled centered on“Nozomi” Put N700A into commercial service 1,652.5 to ensure operational efficiency and significantly strengthen its management base. We will 800 continue to maintain sound management and stable dividends for the future and strive to 1,559.4 develop our business. 1,486.6 1,508.3 2017 1,467.6 The“smartEX” service starts for the Tokaido 1,384.0 Shinkansen and the Sanyo Shinkansen 1,366.9 2008 662.0 1,278.3 The “EX-IC” service starts for the 1,240.6 Tokaido Shinkansen 1,215.3 1,221.6 656.1 600 1,188.3 578.6 1,052.3 2006 1,000 2001 “Express Reservation” service expands to the total 494.6 length of Tokaido and Sanyo Shinkansen lines “Express Reservation” is launched 874.6 for Tokaido Shinkansen 434.4 403.7 395.5 800 394.0 383.7 400 371.0 370.4 372.5 397.8 344.4 325.6 337.4 293.4 288.4 2008 JR Central made NIPPON SHARYO, LTD.
  • Nippon Sharyo Manufacturing, LLC Project Administration, Procurement, Manufacturing, Quality Control and Warranty Service

    Nippon Sharyo Manufacturing, LLC Project Administration, Procurement, Manufacturing, Quality Control and Warranty Service

    Introduction to Nippon Sharyo, Ltd. (Japan) Corporate Profile (March, 2011) Head Office: Nagoya, Aichi, Japan Established: September 1896 Paid-in capital: US$ 131 million (11.8 billion yen ) Sales: US$ 1.1 billion (94.8 billion yen) Employees: Approx. 2,000 ISO Certification ISO9001 ISO14001 2 Nippon Sharyo, Ltd. (Japan) Sales from Each Division 8.5% 14.8% 52.6% 24.0% 3 Nippon Sharyo, Ltd. (Japan) Overview of the Toyokawa Rolling Stock Plant • Main Products: Rolling Stock (EMU including High Speed Rail, DMU, LRV, Locomotives) • Plant Opening: April, 1964 • Total Land Area: 77.5 Acres (314,000 m2) • Area of Building: 1,307,000 Sq. Ft. (101,000 m2) • Manufacturing Capability: Max. 600 Cars / Year (As of March 2011) • Direct Employees: Approx.1,100 Toyokawa Rolling Stock Plant 4 Toyokawa Rolling Stock Plant Profile • Administration • Design • Engineering • Carbody and Truck Production • Final Assembly • Quality Assurance • Purchasing • Material Storage (all types of material including stainless steel, aluminum, mild and HTLA steel sheets and plates) • Test and Inspection (including watertightness test facility, inspection pits, climatic test chamber for complete vehicle) • Test Track: 0.5 mile (800 m) Rolling Stock Plant of Nippon Sharyo 5 High Speed Rail 1964 1986 1997 1999 2005 Taiwan Series 0 Series 100 (130mph) Series E2 (143mph) (171mph) Series 700 Series 700T (177mph) (186 mph) 1982 1992 1997 2007 Series 200 (137mph) Series 300 Series 500 (168mph) (186mph) Japan Series N700 (186mph) Over 3,200 cars completed as of Dec. 2011 6 Express
  • Trams Making Way for Light Rail Transit

    Trams Making Way for Light Rail Transit

    Feature New Promise of LRT Systems Trams Making Way for Light Rail Transit Shigenori Hattori medium-capacity, electric cars running on key part of medium-capacity urban transit Introduction rails. The cars are about 2.65-m wide and systems supplemented by links to cars, operate on their own right of way over buses and other transportation modes In 1978, the city of Edmonton in Canada elevated track, underground, etc., through Transportation Demand opened the world’s first urban transport permitting higher operating speeds. This Management (TDM) strategies. system based on the Light Rail Transit (LRT) type of definition could also include many LRT systems fulfil their role as medium- concept discussed in this article. Over suburban railways. capacity urban transit systems by the next 25 years, LRT systems have been In Japan, LRT systems are typically viewed operating articulated cars that can be up built in more than 70 cities worldwide. as sharing the road with motor vehicles, to 40-m long and sometimes the entire Of the approximately 350 tram systems like the trams in Grenoble and Strasbourg. train set can total 100 m. now in operation, about 30% can be Although such systems are known as trams Although some tram operators in Japan described as LRT systems, because they or streetcars in Europe and North America, are modernizing by introducing low-floor have been refurbished and modified to it is often assumed that even low-floor light rail vehicles (LF-LRVs), trams are still LRT standards. trams are not LRT systems. not highly regarded as an urban transit Due to historical differences and different Many Japanese cities had tramways in the mode because most rolling stock consists approaches taken when introducing light early 20th century but most abandoned of 13-m or so bogie cars that are similar rail systems, the term ‘LRT’ means one them in the postwar period of rapid growth to buses.
  • Railway Technologies & Services Japan Market Study

    Railway Technologies & Services Japan Market Study

    Railway Technologies & Services Japan Market Study JULY 2019 © Copyright EU Gateway | Business Avenues The information and views set out in this study are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of EU Gateway | Business Avenues and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The purpose of this report is to give European companies selected for participation in the EU Gateway | Business Avenues Programme an introductory understanding of the target markets countries and support them in defining their strategy towards those markets. For more information, visit www.eu-gateway.eu. EU Gateway to Japan Central Management Unit Japan Market Study July 2019 Submitted to the European Commission on 22 July 2019 Railway Technologies & Services - Japan Market Study - Page 3 of 143 Table of contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. 9 2. WHAT ARE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF JAPAN? .........................................................................................
  • Data File 2006

    Data File 2006

    DATA FILE 2006 KAWASAKI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. Code No. (7012) HISTORY Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. (KHI) traces its origins to an industrial shipyard in Tsukiji, Tokyo, established by Shozo Kawasaki in 1878. In 1896, KHI was incorporated under the laws of Japan as Kawasaki Dockyard Co., Ltd. The Company later expanded its business to include the manufacture of rolling stock, steel, steel structures, industrial machinery, automobiles and aircraft. KHI also engaged in the shipping business through the company known as Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd., which later became an independent company. In 1939, KHI adopted its present name, Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. In 1950, KHI’s steel manufacturing division was divested and Kawasaki Steel Corporation was formed. In 1969, Kawasaki Aircraft Co., Ltd. and Kawasaki Rolling Stock Mfg. Co., Ltd., former divisions which had been divested, were merged back into KHI, forming an integrated heavy industry enterprise. KHI established a subsidiary in the United States to sell its motorcycles in 1966. In 1975, through its local subsidiary, KHI began to produce motorcycles in the United States ahead of any other Japanese producer of any type of motor vehicle. Subsequently, through its U.S. subsidiaries, KHI began to manufacture rolling stock in New York in 1986, wheel loaders in Georgia in 1987, and small gasoline engines in Missouri in 1989. In 1993, KHI established a local subsidiary to acquire a hydraulic machinery manufacturing business in Plymouth, U.K., its first production facility in Europe. In 2001, KHI built a new rolling stock plant in Lincoln, Nebraska, where we already have a motorcycle plant.
  • Light Rail Vehicle Compression Requirements

    Light Rail Vehicle Compression Requirements

    T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Synthesis 25 Light Rail Vehicle Compression Requirements A Synthesis of Transit Practice Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1997 SELECTION COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN OFFICERS MICHAEL S. TOWNES Peninsula Transportation District Chair: DAVID N. WORMLEY, Dean of Engineering, Pennsylvania State University Commission Vice Chair: SHARON D. BANKS, General Manager, AC Transit Executive Director: ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board, National Research Council MEMBERS MEMBERS SHARON D. BANKS AC Transit BRIAN J. L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor, Bruton Center for Development Studies, LEE BARNES University of Texas at Dallas Barwood Inc LILLIAN C. BORRONE, Director, Port Department, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Past GERALD L. BLAIR Chair, 1995) Indiana County Transit Authority DAVID BURWELL, President, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy SHIRLEY A. DELIBERO E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation New Jersey Transit Corporation JAMES N. DENN, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Transportation ROD J. DIRIDON JOHN W. FISHER, Director, ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Lehigh University International Institute for Surface DENNIS J. FITZGERALD, Executive Director, Capital District Transportation Authority Transportation Policy Study DAVID R. GOODE, Chairman, President, and CEO, Norfolk Southern Corporation SANDRA DRAGGOO DELON HAMPTON, Chairman & CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates CATA LESTER A. HOEL, Hamilton Professor, University of Virginia, Department of Civil Engineering LOUIS J. GAMBACCINI JAMES L.
  • Data File 2009

    Data File 2009

    DATA FILE 2009 KAWASAKI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. Code No. (7012) HISTORY Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. (KHI) traces its origins to an industrial shipyard in Tsukiji, Tokyo, established by Shozo Kawasaki in 1878. In 1896, KHI was incorporated under the laws of Japan as Kawasaki Dockyard Co., Ltd. The Company later expanded its business to include the manufacture of rolling stock, steel, steel structures, industrial machinery, automobiles and aircraft. KHI also engaged in the shipping business through the company known as Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd., which later became an independent company. In 1939, KHI adopted its present name, Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. In 1950, KHI’s steel manufacturing division was divested and Kawasaki Steel Corporation (it is now existed as JFE Steel Corporation) was formed. In 1969, Kawasaki Aircraft Co., Ltd. and Kawasaki Rolling Stock Mfg. Co., Ltd., former divisions which had been divested, were merged back into KHI, forming an integrated heavy industry enterprise. KHI established a subsidiary in the United States to sell its motorcycles in 1966. In 1975, through its local subsidiary, KHI began to produce motorcycles in the United States ahead of any other Japanese producer of any type of motor vehicle. Subsequently, through its U.S. subsidiaries, KHI began to manufacture rolling stock in New York in 1986, wheel loaders in Georgia in 1987, and small gasoline engines in Missouri in 1989. In 1993, KHI established a local subsidiary to acquire a hydraulic machinery manufacturing business in Plymouth, U.K., its first production facility in Europe. In 2001, KHI built a new rolling stock plant in Lincoln, Nebraska, where we already have a motorcycle plant.
  • US Manufacture of Rail Vehicles for Intercity

    US Manufacture of Rail Vehicles for Intercity

    ! "#$#!%&'()&*+(,-!.)!/&01! 2-30*1-4!).,!5'+-,*0+6! 7&44-'8-,!/&01!&'9! ",:&'!;,&'40+! ! ! !"#$%&'"()$*+"!+$%,-*-" ! ! %&,*6!B.C-?!$&.,0!;.D(.D&?!E,04+-'!F(:&6?! <('-!=>?!=@A@! &'9!G&,6!G-,-))0! ! H.'+,0:(+0'8!HGGH!,-4-&,*3-,I!;&10!;,088! ! ! ! ! ./0/"1$+&2$34&5'"62"7$*%"#')*3%'-"265"8+4'53*4,"9$--'+:'5"7$*%"$+;".5<$+"=5$+-*4" This research was prepared on behalf of Apollo Alliance with support from the Rockefeller Foundation and Surdna Foundation. The authors would like to thank Matt Mayrl of the Apollo Alliance for comments on early drafts. Many thanks also to the following reviewers: Doug Bowen, Chandra Brown, Nora Friend, Ruggero Golini, Dennis Harwig, Hatsuhiko Kageyama, Mike Mekhiche, Richard Moss, Matthew Palilla, Mike Pracht, Maryanne Roberts, Robin Stimson, and Chuck Wochele. Errors of fact or interpretation remain exclusively with the authors. We welcome comments and suggestions. The lead author can be contacted at [email protected]. List of Abbreviations APMs Automated People Movers ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act CNR China North Locomotive and Rolling Stock Industry Group CSR China South Locomotive and Rolling Stock Industry Group DMUs Diesel Multiple Units EMUs Electric Multiple Units EMD Electro Motive Diesel EWI Edison Welding Institute FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration HSR High Speed Rail IAMAW International Association of Machinists IBEW International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers LRT Light Rail Transit NAICS North American Industry Classification System OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer PRIIA Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 UNIFE Union des Industries Ferroviaires Européennes U.S. PIRG Federation of State Public Interest Research Groups Photo Permissions: Cover photo by Dave Wilcox (2008), Tostie14, (2005) and Doug Beghtel (2009) © June 22, 2010.
  • Annual Business Report.Indd

    Annual Business Report.Indd

    Annual Business Report April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015 NIPPON SHARYO, LTD. and Consolidated Subsidiaries Financial Highlights Comparison of Sales by Segment (Unit: millions of yen) 186th period 185th period Business Segment Increase/(Decrease) (2014-2015) (2013-2014) Railway rolling stock 55,035 57.1 % 79,100 63.6 % (24,065) (30.4)% Transportation equipment 16.9 12.9 1.6 and Steel structure 16,260 16,008 252 Construction equipment 20,311 21.1 21,479 17.3 (1,168) (5.4) Other 4,693 4.9 7,724 6.2 (3,031) (39.3) Total 96,299 100.0 124,311 100.0 (28,012) (22.5) Change in Operating Performance and Asset Status (Unit: millions of yen except Net income per share) 186th period 185th period 184th period Titles of account (2014-2015) (2013-2014) (2012-2013) Net sales 96,299 124,311 83,018 Ordinary income (loss) (8,234) 6,677 2,096 Net income (loss) (14,568) 6,930 1,598 Net income per share (loss) (¥100.91) ¥48.00 ¥11.07 Total assets 145,137 141,453 133,400 Total equity 51,461 63,332 57,403 (Millions of Yen) Comparison of Sales by Segment 140,000 Other 120,000 100,000 Construction equipment 80,000 Transportation equipment 60,000 and Steel structure 40,000 Railway rolling stock 20,000 0 186th period 185th period 184th period Contents Message from the President 2 Review by Segment 4 Investment in Plant and Equipment 6 Financing Activities 6 Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent Auditor's Report 7 Corporate Information 37 Directory 37 N700A Shinkansen train 1 Message from the President Review of Business Operations During the fiscal term under review, the Japanese economy saw an improvement in capital investment and employment as a result of various economic policies and measures although consumer spending showed weak growth in reaction to last-minute demands prior to the consumption tax hike.