Information to Users
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in ^pewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and ürq>roper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright materW had to be removed, a note wiH indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the origiiml, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from lefr to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of die book. Photogra|}hs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographicaUy in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations ^ipearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bel! & Howell Information Company 300 North 2 e e b Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313.'761-4700 800/521-0600 CUMULATIVE SLAVICITŸ; CULTURAL INTERACTION AND LANGUAGE REPLACEMENT IN THE NORTH BALKANS DURING THE SLAVIC MIGRATION PERIOD, AD 500-900 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Petar Milich, BA, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 1995 Dissertation Committee; Approved by Timothy E. Gregory Eve Levin AdWseW Jack M. Balcer Department oWstory DMI Number; 9526063 DMI Microform 9526063 Copyright 1995, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 To fly Parents 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I Express appreciation to Dr. Timothy E. Gregory for his guidance and insight throughout the research. Sincere thanks go to the other members of my advisory committee, Drs. Eve Levin Jack M. Balcer, and James Harf for their suggestions and comments. Gratitude is expressed to Dr. Predrag Matejic for his helpful insights. To my wife, Michele, I offer sincere thanks for her patience, support, and willingness to endure with me through many arduous days. To my sister Lillian, whose technical expertise in document formatting was indispensable to me. Ill VITA December 12,1958 ......... .................. Bom - St. Louis, Missouri 1983 ...................................................... B.A., St. Louis University 1984-Present ................................... Graduate Student, Department of History, The Ohio State University 1988-89 ............................................ Dumbarton Oaks Prize Fellow; Byzantine Institute, Belgrade, Yugoslavia 1990 .................................................... Fulbright Fellow (award declined) 1991 .................................................... Dumbarton Oaks Bulgarian Exchange Fellow PUBLICATIONS “Hilandar Serbian Church Slavonic Chrysoboull *139/141 as Evidence for Byzantine-Serbian Cultural Interaction.” Presented before the Fourteenth Annual Byzantine Studies Conference in Houston, Texas, 12 November 1989 IV FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: History Studies in Roman and Byzantine history and archaeology (Dr. Timothy E. Gregory) Studies in Medieval Bulgarian, Serbian, and Romanian history (Dr. Eve Levin) Studies in Byzantine, Bulgarian, and Serbian diplomatics and sigillography (Dr. Mateja Matejic, Dr. Predrag Matejic, Dr. Mirjana 2ivojinovic) TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ............. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................iü VITA .................................................................................................................iv CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 1 Geography and C ulture ............................................ 11 II. WHO WERE THE SLAVS ? .................................................... 27 Traditional Interpretations of the Ethnogenesis of the Slavs ...................................... 28 The Dynamics of Slav Ethnogenesis ..................... 31 Pritsak and the Altaic School ............................... 38 Sklavenol Organization.......................................... 45 Proto-Slavic Sub-Culture .................................... 48 111. LAND-TAKING REVISITED ................................................. 70 Twilight on the Danube ........................................... 76 Avars in the Balkans............................................... 94 Slavic Settlements South of the Danube 98 Imperial Recovery ................................................... 108 VI IV. URBAN CONTINUITY/DISCONTINUITY AND THE SLAVS 131 V. LOCI OF INTERACTION.............................................. 158 Singidunum................................................................ i61 The Danubisn Limes ................................................ 176 Dardania, Prevail tana, Epiros Nova ........................ 187 VI. CONTACT SITUATIONS: DACIA, ILLYRICUM ORIENTALIS AND SCYTHIA MINOR.................................................................... 203 D acia........ ................................................................ 203 Suchava........................................................................ 209 Sarata Monteoru....................................................... 212 lpote§ti-Kinde§t1-Ciureli Cultural Complex 214 lllyrlcum; Nova Cherna............................................... 216 Dzhedzhovi Lozia (Popina) ......................................... 218 Abritos ...................................................................... 223 Scythia Minor ..............................................................227 VII. CONCLUSION..................................................... 240 LIST OF REFERENCES................ ................................................................ 257 vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The 1990s ere witness to a global migration, the magnitude of which evokes comparison with the barbarian invasions of Europe during late Antiquity and the early Middle Ages. The difference between the two Is a matter of proportion, for this time, virtually every comer of the globe Is effected by a phenomenon which we might loosely call the new-age Volkewanderung. I realize, of course, that this particular term traditionally applies to the migration of various Germanic folk In Europe from the second to the sixth century AD; yet I have deliberately invoked it in order to establish a parallel between today's global migrations, and those of the Slavic migration period In the Balkans.i The Drang nach Osten Is a classic example of so-called constrained population displacement, a term which I have borrowed from the lexicon of processual archaeology. Some Balkan historians would have us believe that constrained population displacement, which is a recurrent theme in the annals of Balkan history, is responsible for all attested cases of population movements. Indeed, Balkan history is fraught with compelling tales of ethnic communities forced to leave their "ancestral homelands" in the wake of advancing invaders. For example, in this century alone, the Balkans has been the epi-center of several devastating wars that did indeed alter the ethnic complexion of Kosovo and of Western Macedonia. 1 2 Some Medieval Balkan historians have adhered to the notion that the "Slavic invasions" of the first millennium AD constituted a prime example of "ethnic cleansing." The Balkan peninsula became a non-urban society during the Slavic migration period. Many scholars have viewed this transformation as the result of invasion by people who brought with them a lower range of material culture. Moreover, these invasions purportedly originated in some hypothetical Urheimat. Past scholars have spoken of elite dominance or constrained population displacement paradigms, according to which, the appearance of new forms of material culture is indicative of wholesale demographic change. Previous scholarship has held that the Slavic invasions and subsequent land-taking (Landnahme) resulted in the Slavicization of much of the Balkans. However, the Slavicization of the Balkans did not result just from the single phenomenon of invasions. Indeed, the nature and extent of the Slavic "invasions" has been exaggerated. Instead, the Slavicization phenomenon can be better explained by complex socio-linguistic processes which have left their traces in documentary, archaeological, and linguistic evidence. The diffusion of so-called "immigrant farmer" material culture that will be discussed in this study could be achieved through population movement or various diffusionary processes. It is not the purpose of this study to demonstrate the arrival of new populations in the archaeological record. On this contentious issue enough has been said by previous scholarship. Rather, the focus of this study is on the transformation of Balkan culture through a variety of diffusionary mechanisms that do not involve long-distance migration and wholesale ethnic turnover (although