The River Beneath the River the Anacostia Flows Into a Better Future
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Remedial Investigation Report (Draft)
Prepared for: Prepared by: Pepco and Pepco Energy Services AECOM Washington, D.C. Beltsville, Maryland February 2016 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (DRAFT) Benning Road Facility 3400 Benning Road, NE Washington, DC 20019 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (DRAFT) Benning Road Facility 3400 Benning Road, N.E. Washington, DC 20019 PREPARED FOR: Pepco and Pepco Energy Services 701 9th Street, NW Washington, DC 20068 PREPARED BY: AECOM 8000 Virginia Manor Road, Suite 110 Beltsville, MD 20705 February 2016 AECOM Project Team ________________________________ ________________________________ Robert Kennedy Betsy Ruffle Data Management and Forensics Lead Human Health Risk Assessment Lead ________________________________ ________________________________ Maryann Welsch Helen Jones Ecological Risk Assessment Lead Background Data Evaluation Lead ________________________________ ________________________________ Ben Daniels John Bleiler Field Operations Lead and Report Compiler Senior Technical Reviewer ________________________________ Ravi Damera, P.E., BCEE Project Manager ES-1 Executive Summary This draft Remedial Investigation Report presents the results of recently completed environmental investigation activities at Pepco’s Benning Road facility (the Site), located at 3400 Benning Road NE, Washington, DC. The Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Study Area consists of a “Landside” component focused on the Site itself, and a “Waterside” component focused on the shoreline and sediments in the segment of the Anacostia River adjacent to -
Interior Flooding in Washington, DC a First Look at Where It Occurs in the District of Columbia
Interior Flooding in Washington, DC A first look at where it occurs in the District of Columbia DC Silver Jackets Interior Flooding Task Group August 25, 2017 Figure 1: A portion of the map produced by the DC Silver Jackets that is the subject of this paper. The full map is at the end of the document. Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 About the DC Silver Jackets ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 What is Interior Flooding? ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Why Study Interior Flooding? ................................................................................................................................. 3 Report Purpose .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Background .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Recent Interior Flood Events ................................................................................................................................. -
Ward 7 Heritage Guide
WARD 7 HERITAGE GUIDE A Discussion of Ward 7 Cultural and Heritage Resources Ward 7 Heritage Guide Text by Patsy M. Fletcher, DC Historic Preservation Office Design by Kim Elliott, DC Historic Preservation Office Published 2013 Unless stated otherwise, photographs and images are from the DC Office of Planning collection. This project has been funded in part by U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund grant funds, administered by the District of Columbia’s Historic Preservation Office. The contents and opinions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Depart- ment of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the U.S. Department of the Interior. This program has received Federal financial assistance for the identification, protection, and/or rehabilitation of historic properties and cultural resources in the District of Columbia. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability in its Federally assisted programs. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction......................................................................................................................5 -
Housing in the Nation's Capital
Housing in the Nation’s2005 Capital Foreword . 2 About the Authors. 4 Acknowledgments. 4 Executive Summary . 5 Introduction. 12 Chapter 1 City Revitalization and Regional Context . 15 Chapter 2 Contrasts Across the District’s Neighborhoods . 20 Chapter 3 Homeownership Out of Reach. 29 Chapter 4 Narrowing Rental Options. 35 Chapter 5 Closing the Gap . 43 Endnotes . 53 References . 56 Appendices . 57 Prepared for the Fannie Mae Foundation by the Urban Institute Margery Austin Turner G. Thomas Kingsley Kathryn L. S. Pettit Jessica Cigna Michael Eiseman HOUSING IN THE NATION’S CAPITAL 2005 Foreword Last year’s Housing in the Nation’s Capital These trends provide cause for celebration. adopted a regional perspective to illuminate the The District stands at the center of what is housing affordability challenges confronting arguably the nation’s strongest regional econ- Washington, D.C. The report showed that the omy, and the city’s housing market is sizzling. region’s strong but geographically unbalanced But these facts mask a much more somber growth is fueling sprawl, degrading the envi- reality, one of mounting hardship and declining ronment, and — most ominously — straining opportunity for many District families. Home the capacity of working families to find homes price escalation is squeezing families — espe- they can afford. The report provided a portrait cially minority and working families — out of of a region under stress, struggling against the city’s housing market. Between 2000 and forces with the potential to do real harm to 2003, the share of minority home buyers in the the quality of life throughout the Washington District fell from 43 percent to 37 percent. -
Case 1:00-Cv-00183-TFH Document 115-3 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:00-cv-00183-TFH Document 115-3 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 4 Case 1:00-cv-00183-TFH Document 115-3 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 4 Case 1:00-cv-00183-TFH Document 115-3 Filed 05/19/15 Page 3 of 4 Case 1:00-cv-00183-TFH Document 115-3 Filed 05/19/15 Page 4 of 4 Case 1:00-cv-00183-TFH Document 115-4 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 3 Case 1:00-cv-00183-TFH Document 115-4 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 3 Case 1:00-cv-00183-TFH Document 115-4 Filed 05/19/15 Page 3 of 3 Case 1:00-cv-00183-TFH Document 115-5 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 34 APPENDIX D Case 1:00-cv-00183-TFH Document 115-5 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 34 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY LONG TERM CSO CONTROL PLAN ANACOSTIA RIVER PROJECTS DOCUMENT II-3:5-FI FACILITY PLAN SUMMARY REPORT AND DETAILED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE SEPTEMBER 23, 2008 CDM/HMM, A JOINT VENTURE – FACILITY PLAN, DCFA #399-WSA GREELEY AND HANSEN LLC - OPERATIONAL PLAN, EPMC-III Case 1:00-cv-00183-TFH Document 115-5 Filed 05/19/15 Page 3 of 34 II-3:5-FI Anacostia River Projects Facility Plan Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Summary Report and Detailed Implementation Schedule 1. Background and Introduction ............................................................... 1 2. Project Scope & Description of Facilities............................................. 5 3. Project Setting....................................................................................... 8 4. Investigation and Evaluation of Alternatives....................................... -
The 2020 Transit Development Plan
DC Circulator Transit Development Plan 2020 Update April 12, 2021 (Page intentionally left blank) DC Circulator 2020 TDP i April 2021 Transit Development Plan 2020 Update DRAFT Table of Contents 1.046T 46T Introduction46T ..............................................................46T .................................................... 1 46T 46T Purpose of the Transit Development Plan (TDP)46T ..............................................................46T ............ 1 46T 46T Transit Development Plan Process46T ..............................................................46T ................................. 3 2.046T 46T DC Circulator System Overview46T ..............................................................46T ....................... 4 46T 46T History46T ..............................................................46T ............................................................................. 4 46T 46T Organizational Structure46T 46T ............................................................................................................... 6 46T 46T Strategic Goals and Objectives46T ..............................................................46T ....................................... 6 46T 46T Levels of Service46T 46T ............................................................................................................................ 8 46T 46T Fare Structure46T ..............................................................46T ............................................................... 10 46T 46T Fleet -
Comprehensive Plan Far Northeast and Southeast Area Element
Comprehensive Plan Far Northeast and Southeast Area Element Proposed Amendments DELETIONS ADDITIONS Chapter 17_Public_Review_Draft-Far NE SE_April2020.docxApril 2020 Page 1 of 47 Comprehensive Plan Far Northeast and Southeast Area Element Proposed Amendments 1700 OVERVIEW Overview 1700 1700.1 The Far Northeast and Southeast Planning Area encompasses 8.3 square miles located east of I-295 and north of Naylor Road SE. Most of the area has historically been in Ward 7, although in past decades due to Census redistricting, parts have been included in Wards 6 and 8. Its boundaries are shown in the Mapmap to the left. at left. Most of this area has historically been Ward 7 although in past decades, parts have been included in Wards 6 and 8. 1700.1 1700.2 Far Northeast and Southeast is known for its stable, attractive its established neighborhoods and its diverse mix of housing. It includes single-family communities like Hillcrest, Eastland Gardens, and Penn Branch; row house and semi-detached housing neighborhoods, such as Twining, River Terrace, and Fairlawn; and apartment communities, such as like Naylor Gardens, Mayfair Mansions, and Lincoln Heights. The area has an excellent robust transportation network, including the Minnesota Avenue, Benning Road, and Deanwood Metrorail stations, Interstate I-295, and several major avenues linking neighborhoods to the underserved communities in Wards 7 and 8 River to Central Washington. Far Northeast and Southeast is one of the District’s greenest areas. The recently renovated Marvin Gaye Park is home to the District’s segment of the Watts Branch Tributary. Watts Branch flows aboveground through the park to the Anacostia River, bisecting the southeastern portion of Ward 7. -
Chapter 10 – References
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT References 1 1 Code of Federal Regulations, 601. National Capital Planning Commission, National Environmental 2 Policy Act Regulations. Accessed from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-09-29/pdf/2017- 3 20614.pdf. Accessed on June 1, 2018. 4 11 District of Columbia Municipal Regulations, Zoning Regulations of 2016. Accessed from 5 http://www.dcregs.dc.gov/Search/District of Columbia Municipal RegulationsSearchByTitle.aspx. 6 Accessed on June 6, 2018. 7 11 District of Columbia Municipal Regulations, Zoning Regulations, Chapter 11, Union Station North, 8 Section 11-2905 Height. Accessed from 9 https://dcregs.dc.gov/Common/DCMR/SectionList.aspx?SectionNumber=11-2905. Accessed on August 14, 10 2017. 11 12 District of Columbia Municipal Regulations, Construction Codes. Accessed from 12 https://dcra.dc.gov/page/dc-construction-codes. Accessed on January 25, 2018. 13 12 District of Columbia Municipal Regulations, Fire Code Supplement of 2013. Accessed from 14 https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/document/923. Accessed on June 7, 2017. 15 20 District of Columbia Municipal Regulations, Chapter 2. Accessed from 16 https://www.dcregs.dc.gov/Common/DCMR/RuleList.aspx?ChapterNum=20-2&ChapterId=462. Accessed on 17 November 17, 2017. 18 20 District of Columbia Municipal Regulations, Chapter 3. Accessed from https://www.epa.gov/sips- 19 dc/district-columbia-sip-20-District of Columbia Municipal Regulations,-chapter-3-general-and-non- 20 attainment-area-permits. Accessed on November 17, 2017. 21 20 District of Columbia Municipal Regulations, Chapter 5. Accessed from 22 https://doee.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/ddoe/publication/attachments/aqd.revch5_.pdf. -
Print Untitled (21 Pages)
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Office of Zoning * * * Z.C. CASE NO.: 04-33G As Secretary to the Commission, I hereby certify that on February 2, 2016, copies of the attached notice were sent via electronic mail, or by first-class, postage prepaid mail, to the following: 1. All ANCs (see attached list) 4. Citizens/Civic Associations (see attached list) 2. All ANC/SMDs (see attached list) 3. Gottlieb Simon ANC Note: due to an issue with returned mail from these two AN Cs, in addition to sending to the offices of all the ANCs, we also sent to the home addresses of the Chairs of these ANCs: 5. Chairperson Olivia Henderson ANC8D 4612 6th Street S.E. Washington, D.C. 20032 6. Chairperson Ronald Austin ANC 4B 6120 North Dakota Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20011 ATTESTED BY: 0. o~J.ll,1,M . Sharon S. Schellin Secretary to the Zoning Commission Office of Zoning ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 04-33G 441 4th Street, N.W., Suite 200-S, Washington, D.C. 20001 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Telephone: (202) 727-6311 Facsimile: (202) 727-6072 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.dcoz.dc.gov CASE NO.04-33G DeletedEXHIBIT NO.63 A public hearing is scheduled for March 3, 2016 at 6:30 p.m. to entertain a petition filed by the Coalition for Smarter Growth, et al., to amend Chapter 26, lnclu sionary Zoning (IZ) (Z.C. Case No. 04-33G). The Office of Planning (OP) has also recommended alternative text, which is part of the same case. -
Glossary and Index
Glossary of Terms & Index The Glossary is not a formally adopted part of the Comprehensive Plan and is intended for general guidance only. In the event of a conflict between these definitions and a formal, legal definition established by a City ordinance such as the Zone Regulations, the legal definition shall prevail. Definitions in this section are drawn from many different sources, including Office of Planning staff and its consultants, the Comprehensive Plan itself, other city plans and planning documents, the DC Zone Regulations, the APA Planners Dictionary, Random House Dictionary, and websites such as www.dc.gov, wikipedia.com, dictionary.com, and reference.com. Definitions found in these secondary sources have been modified and adapted based on the use of each term in the Comprehensive Plan. GLOSSARY OF TERMS GLOSSARY OF TERMS LIST OF AGENCY ABBREVIATIONS ABCB Alcoholic Beverage Control Board EOM Executive Office of the Mayor ANC Office of Advisory Neighborhood FEMS Fire and Emergency Services Commissions HPRB Historic Preservation Review Board AOC Architect of the Capitol MPD Metropolitan Police Department AWC Anacostia Waterfront Corporation MWCOG Metropolitan Washington Council of CC Council of the District of Columbia Governments (DC Council) MTA Maryland Transit Authority CFA Commission of Fine Arts NCPC National Capital Planning Commission COAH Commission on Arts and Humanities NCRC National Capital Revitalization Corporation DBID Downtown Business Improvement District NPS National Park Service DCEMA DC Emergency Management -
Comprehensive Plan Mid-City Area Element
Comprehensive Plan Mid-City Area Element Proposed Amendments DELETIONS ADDITIONS April 2020 Page 1 of 48 Comprehensive Plan Mid-City Area Element Proposed Amendments 2000 OVERVIEW Overview 2000 2000.1 The Mid-City Planning Area encompasses the 3.1 square miles located in the geographic center of the District of Columbia Washington, DC. It extends from Rock Creek Park on the west to the CSX rail corridor on the east. Its southern edge is formed by Florida Avenue NW and U Street NW, and its northern edge is formed by Spring Road NW and Rock Creek Church Road NW. The boundaries are shown in the Mmap at left. Most of this area has historically been in Ward 1, although the easternmost portion is currently part of Ward 5 and the southernmost portion is currently in Ward 2. 2000.1 2000.2 Mid-City is one of the most diverse parts of the city Washington, DC. Although it is one of the smallest of the 10ten planning areas geographically, it is the most populous and most dense. Much of the area was developed during the late 19th 19th and early 20th 20th centuries, giving it a rich and historic urban character. The area includes row house neighborhoods, such as Adams Morgan, Bloomingdale, Columbia Heights, Eckington, Le Droit Park, Park View, Pleasant Plains, and Mount Pleasant. It includes large apartment communities along streets such, as 14th 14th Street NW, 16th 16th Street, NW, and Columbia Road NW. It is also home to several large institutions, such as Howard University, and Howard University Hospital, and the McMillan Sand Filtration Site. -
Proposed Kingman Park HD Staff Report with Historic Context
HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Historic Designation Case No. 16-19 Kingman Park Historic District All properties within a boundary formed by East Capitol Street, 19th Street, Maryland Avenue and M Street NE and the Anacostia River, including the following squares, parcels and reservations: Squares 1118, 1119, 1120, 1125, 1126, 1127, 1128, 1134, 1139, 4458, 4459, 4460, 4461, 4462, 4463, 4464, 4477, 4478, 4480, 4481, 4483, 4483E, 4484, 4486, 4495, 4506, 4514, 4515, 4516, 4517, 4518, 4522, 4523, 4525, 4526, 4527, 4528; 4549, 4550, 4558 and 4559; all lots in Parcels 149 and 160; Lot 10 in Parcel 162; and Reservations 343F and 343G Meeting Dates: January 25 and April 26, 2018 Applicant: Kingman Park Civic Association Affected Advisory Neighborhood Commissions: 5D, 6A and 7D On January 25, 2018, the Historic Preservation Review Board took up the application for the designation of a Kingman Park Historic District. The applicant, the Kingman Park Civic Association, presented the case. The Historic Preservation Office gave its report which included a series of recommendations, including reducing the extent of the district.1 The ANC and other members of the community presented testimony. At the conclusion of testimony, HPRB asked that additional research be undertaken to support the nomination and the proposed boundaries. Since that meeting, HPO has conducted additional research and analysis on the physical and social history of Kingman Park and developed a written narrative report detailing this history. At the request of the Board, particular attention has been paid to the history of businesses along Benning Road; to the evolution of racial demographics of the neighborhood; and to the buildings and architecture of Kingman Park.