Anacostia Waterfront Initiative 10 Years of Progress
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Air and Space Museum to Undergo Major Construction
January 2018 Circulation 13,000 FREE PAUL "SOUTH" TAYLOR DESERVES HIS PRAISE Page 2 CIRCULATOR Coming Back to SW? Page 3 Air and Space Museum to Undergo Major Construction OP-ED: he first major construction project years. • $250 million: fundraising goal AMIDON IS THE for the Air and Space Museum will • All 23 galleries and presentation spac- • 1,441: newly displayed artifacts T start this summer. es will be transformed. • 7: years scheduled for completion PLACE TO BE • The museum is raising $250 mil- • 0: days closed for construction The facts: lion through private donations to fund The museum has released artist ren- Page 4 • This is the first major construction the future galleries. derings highlighting the exciting changes project for the building in Southwest • The project also includes the complete to come. These renderings (above) rep- Washington, DC, since its opening 41 re-facing of the exterior stone, replace- resent the first nine galleries scheduled years ago. ment of outdated mechanical systems, for renovation. New galleries will be orga- • Visitors will start seeing changes to the and other improvements supported by nized by theme, helping you find your museum in summer 2018. federal funding. favorite stories and make connections COMMUNITY • The museum will remain open through across eras. the project by dividing the construction By the numbers: All information and images courtesy of CALENDAR into two major phases. • 13,000 – stone slabs replaced the Smithsonian National Air and Space • The project is scheduled to take seven • 23: new galleries or presentation spaces Museum. Page 6 MRS. THURGOOD MARSHALL & HER HUSBAND Page 8 FIND US ONLINE AT THESOUTHWESTER.COM, OR @THESOUTHWESTER @THESOUTHWESTER /THESOUTHWESTERDC Published by the Southwest Neighborhood Assembly, Inc. -
The Case for Reconnecting Southeast Washington DC
1 Reimagining DC 295 as a vital multi modal corridor: The Case for Reconnecting Southeast Washington DC Jonathan L. Bush A capstone thesis paper submitted to the Executive Director of the Urban & Regional Planning Program at Georgetown University’s School of Continuing Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Masters of Professional Studies in Urban & Regional Planning. Faculty Advisor: Howard Ways, AICP Academic Advisor: Uwe S. Brandes, M.Arch © Copyright 2017 by Jonathan L. Bush All Rights Reserved 2 ABSTRACT Cities across the globe are making the case for highway removal. Highway removal provides alternative land uses, reconnects citizens and natural landscapes separated by the highway, creates mobility options, and serves as a health equity tool. This Capstone studies DC 295 in Washington, DC and examines the cases of San Francisco’s Embarcadero Freeway, Milwaukee’s Park East Freeway, New York City’s Sheridan Expressway and Seoul, South Korea’s Cheonggyecheon Highway. This study traces the history and the highway removal success using archival sources, news circulars, planning documents, and relevant academic research. This Capstone seeks to provide a platform in favor DC 295 highway removal. 3 KEYWORDS Anacostia, Anacostia Freeway, Anacostia River, DC 295, Highway Removal, I-295, Kenilworth Avenue, Neighborhood Planning, Southeast Washington DC, Transportation Planning, Urban Infrastructure RESEARCH QUESTIONS o How can Washington’s DC 295 infrastructure be modified to better serve local neighborhoods? o What opportunities -
Individual Projects
PROJECTS COMPLETED BY PROLOGUE DC HISTORIANS Mara Cherkasky This Place Has A Voice, Canal Park public art project, consulting historian, http://www.thisplacehasavoice.info The Hotel Harrington: A Witness to Washington DC's History Since 1914 (brochure, 2014) An East-of-the-River View: Anacostia Heritage Trail (Cultural Tourism DC, 2014) Remembering Georgetown's Streetcar Era: The O and P Streets Rehabilitation Project (exhibit panels and booklet documenting the District Department of Transportation's award-winning streetcar and pavement-preservation project, 2013) The Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia: The First 100 Years (exhibit panels and PowerPoint presentations, 2013) Historic Park View: A Walking Tour (booklet, Park View United Neighborhood Coalition, 2012) DC Neighborhood Heritage Trail booklets: Village in the City: Mount Pleasant Heritage Trail (2006); Battleground to Community: Brightwood Heritage Trail (2008); A Self-Reliant People: Greater Deanwood Heritage Trail (2009); Cultural Convergence: Columbia Heights Heritage Trail (2009); Top of the Town: Tenleytown Heritage Trail (2010); Civil War to Civil Rights: Downtown Heritage Trail (2011); Lift Every Voice: Georgia Avenue/Pleasant Plains Heritage Trail (2011); Hub, Home, Heart: H Street NE Heritage Trail (2012); and Make No Little Plans: Federal Triangle Heritage Trail (2012) “Mount Pleasant,” in Washington at Home: An Illustrated History of Neighborhoods in the Nation's Capital (Kathryn Schneider Smith, editor, Johns Hopkins Press, 2010) Mount -
The Most Exciting Neighborhood in the History of the Nation's Capital
where DC meets waterfront experiences The Most Exciting Neighborhood in the History of the Nation’s Capital The Wharf is reestablishing Washington, DC, as a true DINE, SEE A SHOW & SHOP AT THE WHARF waterfront city and destination. This remarkable mile-long The best in dining and entertainment are finding a new home at neighborhood along the Washington Channel of the Potomac The Wharf, which offers more than 20 restaurants and food River brings dazzling water views, hot new restaurants, year- concepts from fine dining to casual cafes and on-the-go round entertainment, and waterside style all together in one gourmet on the waterfront. The reimagined Wharf stays true to inspiring location. The Wharf, situated along the District of its roots with the renovation and expansion of DC’s iconic Columbia’s Southwest Waterfront just blocks south of the Municipal Fish Market, the oldest continuously operating fish National Mall, is easily accessible to the region. Opened in market in the US. In addition, The Wharf features iconic shops October 2017, The Wharf features world-class residences, and convenient services including Politics and Prose, District offices, hotels, shops, restaurants, cultural, private event, Hardware and Bike, Anchor on board with West Marine, Harper marina, and public spaces, including waterfront parks, Macaw, and more. promenades, piers, and docks. Phase 2 delivers in 2022. The Wharf is also becoming DC’s premier entertainment EXPLORE THE WHARF destination. The entertainment scene is anchored by The Anthem, a concert and events venue with a variable capacity The Wharf reconnects Washington, DC, to its waterfront from 2,500 to 6,000 people that is operated by IMP, owners of on the Potomac River. -
Historic District Vision Faces Debate in Burleith
THE GEORGETOWN CURRENT Wednesday, June 22, 2016 Serving Burleith, Foxhall, Georgetown, Georgetown Reservoir & Glover Park Vol. XXV, No. 47 D.C. activists HERE’S LOOKING AT YOU, KID Historic district vision sound off on faces debate in Burleith constitution ciation with assistance from Kim ■ Preservation: Residents Williams of the D.C. Historic By CUNEYT DIL Preservation Office. The goal of Current Correspondent divided at recent meeting the presentation, citizens associa- By MARK LIEBERMAN tion members said, was to gather Hundreds of Washingtonians Current Staff Writer community sentiments and turned out for two constitutional address questions about the impli- convention events over the week- Burleith took a tentative step cations of an application. Many at end to give their say on how the toward historic district designa- the meeting appeared open to the District should function as a state, tion at a community meeting benefits of historic designation, completing the final round of pub- Thursday — but not everyone was while some grumbled that the pre- lic comment in the re-energized immediately won over by the sentation focused too narrowly on push for statehood. prospect. positive ramifications and not The conventions, intended to More than 40 residents of the enough on potential negative ones. hear out practical tweaks to a draft residential neighborhood, which Neighborhood feedback is cru- constitution released last month, lies north and west of George- cial to the process of becoming a brought passionate speeches, and town, turned out for a presentation historic district, Williams said dur- even songs, for the cause. The from the Burleith Citizens Asso- See Burleith/Page 2 events at Wilson High School in Tenleytown featured guest speak- ers and politicians calling on the city to seize recent momentum for Shelter site neighbors seek statehood. -
Nichols Design Associates, Inc. EXHIBIT: 4
Nichols Design Associates, Inc. Mount Pleasant Library Report EXHIBIT: 4 Mount Pleasant Fire Safety Articles/Press Releases (a) Washington Post: DeauvilleApts: 2008.03.14 (b) DCPL Press Release: 2008.03.13 (c) WTOP “Trouble spots”: 2009.08.13 (d) DC FEMS Press Release: 2002.06.30 (e) Washington Post: DCFD & WASA: 2007.10.05 (f) US Red Cross Announcement: 2009.03.18 D.C. Blaze Displaces Nearly 200 - washingtonpost.com http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/13/AR... Sign In | Register Now TODAY'S NEWSPAPER Subscribe | PostPoints NEWS POLITICS OPINIONS BUSINESS LOCAL SPORTS ARTS & LIVING GOING OUT GUIDE JOBS CARS REAL ESTATE RENTALS CLASSIFIEDS SEARCH: | Search Archives washingtonpost.com > Metro > The District » THIS STORY: READ + | WATCH + | Comments D.C. Blaze Displaces Nearly 200 Northwest Apartment Building Had History of Code Violations By Petula Dvorak and Allison Klein GALLERY Washington Post Staff Writers Friday, March 14, 2008 The fire that ripped through a four-story apartment building in Mount Pleasant yesterday, leaving almost 200 people homeless, came after years of complaints about living conditions from tenants and the D.C. government. Business Jobs Legal Jobs THIS STORY Computer Jobs Management Jobs D.C. Blaze Displaces Nearly 200 Construction Jobs Media Jobs How to Help Education Jobs Non-Profit Jobs Engineering Jobs Sales Jobs Fire Destroyed Mount Pleasant Apartment Building Healthcare Jobs Science Jobs Fire Destroyed Mount Pleasant Apartment View All Items in This Story Find Your Dream Job Now! Building keywords location A major fire a year ago today ravaged a Mount Pleasant In recent months, the owners of the apartment building, displacing nearly 200 people. -
Remedial Investigation Report (Draft)
Prepared for: Prepared by: Pepco and Pepco Energy Services AECOM Washington, D.C. Beltsville, Maryland February 2016 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (DRAFT) Benning Road Facility 3400 Benning Road, NE Washington, DC 20019 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (DRAFT) Benning Road Facility 3400 Benning Road, N.E. Washington, DC 20019 PREPARED FOR: Pepco and Pepco Energy Services 701 9th Street, NW Washington, DC 20068 PREPARED BY: AECOM 8000 Virginia Manor Road, Suite 110 Beltsville, MD 20705 February 2016 AECOM Project Team ________________________________ ________________________________ Robert Kennedy Betsy Ruffle Data Management and Forensics Lead Human Health Risk Assessment Lead ________________________________ ________________________________ Maryann Welsch Helen Jones Ecological Risk Assessment Lead Background Data Evaluation Lead ________________________________ ________________________________ Ben Daniels John Bleiler Field Operations Lead and Report Compiler Senior Technical Reviewer ________________________________ Ravi Damera, P.E., BCEE Project Manager ES-1 Executive Summary This draft Remedial Investigation Report presents the results of recently completed environmental investigation activities at Pepco’s Benning Road facility (the Site), located at 3400 Benning Road NE, Washington, DC. The Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Study Area consists of a “Landside” component focused on the Site itself, and a “Waterside” component focused on the shoreline and sediments in the segment of the Anacostia River adjacent to -
Staff Recommendation
STAFF RECOMMENDATION D. Sullivan NCPC File No. 6951/6955 11TH STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT AND RELATED TRANSFER OF JURISDICTION OF A PORTION OF RESERVATION 343D Southeast Washington, D.C. Submitted by the District Department of Transportation and the National Park Service August 27, 2009 Abstract The District Department of Transportation (DDOT), in coordination with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), has submitted a concept design for the 11th Street Bridge project. The purpose of the project is to improve the highway connection between the Southeast/Southwest Freeway (I-695) and the Anacostia Freeway (I-295) in Southeast Washington, D.C. The project would replace the 40-year-old pair of bridges across the Anacostia River and provide safety enhancements to the bridge and approach ramp structures. In order to accommodate new ramp configurations for the project, the National Park Service proposes to transfer jurisdiction of approximately 1.5 acres of Reservation 343D (Anacostia Park) in Washington, D.C. The portion of Reservation 343D that is proposed for jurisdictional transfer is located adjacent to the existing upstream bridge on the east side of the river in Anacostia Park in between Anacostia Drive, SE and the Anacostia Freeway. The underlying land will remain titled in the United States. Commission Action Requested by Applicant Approval of approval of transfer of jurisdiction pursuant to 40 U.S.C. § 8124(a) and approval of comments on concept design pursuant to 40 U.S.C. § 8722(b)(1). Executive Director’s Recommendation The Commission: Approves the transfer of jurisdiction of approximately 1.5 acres of Reservation 343D (Anacostia Park) to the District of Columbia government for transportation purposes as shown on NCPC Map File No. -
Southwest Waterfront Redevelopment
SOUTHWEST WATERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT STAGE 2 PUD – PHASE I HOFFMAN-STRUEVER WATERFRONT, L.L.C. APPLICATION TO THE D.C. ZONING COMMISSION FOR A SECOND STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STATEMENT OF THE APPLICANT February 3, 2012 Submitted by: HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 2099 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 955-3000 Norman M. Glasgow, Jr. Mary Carolyn Brown ZONING COMMISSION Counsel for the Applicant District of Columbia ZONING COMMISSION Case No. 11-03A District of Columbia CASE NO.11-03A 2 EXHIBIT NO.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE .......................................................................................................................................... iii DEVELOPMENT TEAM ...................................................................................................................... v LIST OF EXHIBITS ........................................................................................................................... viii I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 A. Overview ......................................................................................................................... 1 B. The Applicant and Development Team .......................................................................... 2 II. APPROVED STAGE 1 PUD DEVELOPMENT PARAMETER ............................................................. 4 III. PROPOSED VERTICAL DEVELOPMENT....................................................................................... -
Year of Anacostia Council Testimony EAP Draft 2 FINAL
COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Committee on Public Works and Transportation The Year of the Anacostia Statement of Beth Purcell On behalf of the Capitol Hill Restoration Society January 11, 2018 My name is Beth Purcell, and I am testifying on behalf of the Capitol Hill Restoration Society (CHRS), the largest civic organization on Capitol Hill. Since 1955 CHRS has advocated for the welfare of Capitol Hill. Today I would like to talk to you about one of DDOT's most significant accomplishments, the Anacostia Riverwalk Trail, particularly the section near RFK Stadium, and a threat to the trail, ironically coming from DDOT itself. Anacostia Riverwalk Trail The Anacostia Riverwalk Trail is a backbone of the Anacostia Waterfront, connecting residents, visitors and communities to the river, to one another and to numerous commercial and recreational destinations. All of the 20 planned miles are complete, and the trail is offers seamless, scenic travel on both sides of the river for pedestrians and bicyclists between Nationals Park, Historic Anacostia, RFK Stadium, Barney Circle, and the Navy Yard. The attached map shows part of the completed trail route (in red), running on the east and west side or the Anacostia River. Threat to the Anacostia Riverwalk Trail from DDOT's proposed "Park Road" But DDOT and EventsDC threaten Anacostia Riverwalk Trail by their plans to build a new road, called the "Park Drive," from Benning Road to Barney Circle, through Anacostia Park along the west bank of the river, running through the natural resource areas adjacent to RFK Stadium and Congressional Cemetery.1 Many of us on Capitol Hill believe that the so- called Park Drive will be a commuter road. -
District of Columbia Tour Bus Management Initiative Final Report
US Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs Administration District of Columbia Tour Bus Management Initiative Final Report Prepared for District of Columbia Department of Transportation National Capital Planning Commission Washington Convention and Tourism Corporation Downtown DC Business Improvement District Office of DC Councilmember Sharon Ambrose Prepared by Volpe National Transportation Systems Center October 2003 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction . 1 2.0 Best Practices Review . 3 3.0 Solutions Matrix and Site Analysis . 30 4.0 Summary and Conclusions . 71 Appendix A: Stakeholder Interviews . 77 Appendix B: Tour Bus Counting Plan . 95 Appendix C: Preliminary Financial Analysis . .99 District of Columbia Tour Bus Management Initiative 1.0 Introduction: Study Objectives and Technical Approach Washington, DC draws visitors to experience American heritage, culture, and the dynamics of current-day democracy in a setting of majesty and grace befitting a great nation. The tourism and hospitality industry serving these visitors accounts for close to 20 percent of the total workforce in metropolitan Washington.1 Tourism, therefore, is a vital force in the local economy and tour buses, which have been estimated to serve as many as one-third of the visitors to Washington’s historical and cultural attractions, perform a function crucial to both the economic life of the city and its role as the nation’s capital.2 The benefits related to tour bus operations currently come at a significant cost, however. Large numbers of tour buses contribute to traffic congestion on the roadways serving the District and its environs. Several factors compound the adverse traffic impacts associated with tour bus operations. -
Interior Flooding in Washington, DC a First Look at Where It Occurs in the District of Columbia
Interior Flooding in Washington, DC A first look at where it occurs in the District of Columbia DC Silver Jackets Interior Flooding Task Group August 25, 2017 Figure 1: A portion of the map produced by the DC Silver Jackets that is the subject of this paper. The full map is at the end of the document. Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 About the DC Silver Jackets ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 What is Interior Flooding? ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Why Study Interior Flooding? ................................................................................................................................. 3 Report Purpose .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Background .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Recent Interior Flood Events .................................................................................................................................