DOCSLIB.ORG

GTHA Fare Structure Preliminary Business Case

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GTHA Fare Structure Preliminary Business Case GTHA Fare Integration - Preliminary Business Case 1 GTHA Fare Integration Draft Preliminary Business Case Draft Report for Discussion September 2017 $ $ DRAFT $ $ DRAFT DISCLAIMER This Preliminary Business Case report provides an assessment of the case for Fare Integration in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. The work has been undertaken to determine the overall potential for Fare Integration as well as the varying performance for a range of potential Fare Structures. This work has been conducted for Metrolinx using best available information and modelling tools in conjunction with stakeholder engagement with the region’s transit agencies. The analysis included in this report is intended to support decision makers in reviewing and assessing the merits of different fare structures. This work has been completed with a number of working assumptions to develop design and analysis tools that are appropriate for this preliminary Business Case. Assumptions used in this work should be revisited and further defined in future stages of analysis and are only indicative at this stage. Pricing tests used in this analysis are intended for modelling and comparative analysis only, and should not be considered as potential fares without further study and analysis. GTHA Fare Integration Draft Preliminary Business Case Draft Report for Discussion September 2017 DRAFT Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave Metrolinx 1502-80 Richmond Street W 97 Front Street West, Toronto, ON Toronto, ON M5H 2A4 M5J 1E6 Canada +1 (647) 260 4860 na.steerdaviesgleave.com Contents 0 Executive Summary i Preface i Background i Evaluating Potential Fare Structures v Fare Structure Concepts v Strategic Case ix Economic Case xii Financial Case xiv Deliverability and Operations Case xv Business Case Findings xviii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Study Approach 2 1.3 Stakeholder Collaboration 8 1.4 GTHA Fare Structure Model 9 1.5 Report Structure 10 2 Fare Integration Vision 12 2.1 Overview 12 2.2 ContextDRAFT 15 2.3 Problem and Vision Definition 17 2.4 Fare Structure Barriers, Strategic Outcomes, and Evaluation 25 3 Concepts for Evaluation 33 3.1 Overview 33 3.2 Alternative Fare Structure Concepts and Revenue Scenarios 33 3.3 Fare Structure Development 35 3.4 Alternative Fare Structure Concepts 52 4 Strategic Case 67 4.1 Overview 67 4.2 Strategic Evaluation 67 4.3 Strategic Benefit: Increased Transit Ridership 69 4.4 Strategic Outcome 1: Address Fare Barriers to Grow Transit Demand 79 4.5 Strategic Outcome 2: Attract and Retain Ridership through an Improved User Experience 90 4.6 Strategic Outcome 3: Improve the Fare Structure’s Role in Long Term Transit Development 94 4.7 Summary of Strategic Benefits and Issues 105 5 Economic Case 110 5.1 Overview 110 5.2 Approach 110 5.3 Assumptions 112 5.4 Economic Appraisal 112 5.5 Economic Case Interpretation and Summary 118 6 Financial Case 123 6.1 Overview 123 6.2 Approach and Assumptions 123 6.3 Financial Appraisal 124 6.4 Financial Case Summary 127 7 Deliverability and OperationsDRAFT Case 130 7.1 Overview 130 7.2 Delivery and Planning Issues and Risks 131 7.3 Transit Operations Issues and Risks 136 7.4 Customer Risks and Issues 138 7.5 Deliverability Case Summary 146 8 Findings 148 8.1 Overview 148 8.2 Business Case Summary 148 8.3 Key Insights from Business Case 152 8.4 Next Steps 155 Figures FIGURE 1.1 Stages of fare integration analysis FIGURE 1.2 Business Case structure FIGURE 1.3 Business Case structure FIGURE 2.1 Problem overview FIGURE 2.2 Vision overview FIGURE 2.3 GTHA Municipal Service Providers FIGURE 2.4 Fare integration goals FIGURE 2.5 Three perspectives approach FIGURE 2.6 Key structural barriers FIGURE 2.7 TTC and 905 msp double fare FIGURE 2.8 GO transit and msp average fares FIGURE 3.1 Approaches to setting fares by distance FIGURE 3.2 Global experience with fare by distance and zone fares FIGURE 3.3 Design principles FIGURE 3.4 Concept 1 overview FIGURE 3.5 Concept 1b overview FIGURE 3.6 Concept 2 overview FIGURE 3.7 Concept 3 overview FIGURE 3.8 Concept 4 overview FIGURE 3.9 Range of fare integration results FIGURE 4.1 Strategic case logic framework FIGURE 4.2A Change in demand by market (2031) revenue neutral FIGURE 4.2B Change in demand by market (2031) revenue investment FIGURE 4.3A Change in demand by distance travelled (2031) revenue neutral FIGURE 4.3B Change in demand by distance travelled (2031) revenue investment FIGURE 4.4 Flat fare considerations FIGURE 4.5 Zone considerations FIGURE 4.6A Barrier 1 – customers travelling with 905 msps and the TTC pay two fares (revenue neutral) FIGURE 4.6B Barrier 1 – customers travelling with 905 msps and the TTC pay two fares (revenue investment) FIGURE 4.7 Change in GO rail ridership for short and medium trips FIGURE 4.8A Barrier 3 – customers travelling with go transit and the TTC pay two fares (revenue neutral) FIGURE 4.8B DRAFT Barrier 3 – customers travelling with go transit and the TTC pay two fares (revenue investment) FIGURE 4.9A Demand distribution by service and distance (revenue neutral) FIGURE 4.9B Demand distribution by service and distance (revenue investment) FIGURE 5.1 Economic appraisal overview FIGURE 5.2 Calculating user benefits using the rule of a half FIGURE 5.3 Economic sensitivity tests Tables TABLE 2.1 GTHA travel market summary TABLE 2.2 Alignment of fare integration with plans and policies TABLE 2.3 Fare integration study objectives TABLE 2.4 Fare strategy components TABLE 2.5 Evaluation approach TABLE 3.1 Representative service structure TABLE 3.2 Example of zone and fare by distance communication tools TABLE 3.3 Fare by distance case studies TABLE 3.4 Cash fares for FBD on buses TABLE 3.5 Fare integration concepts TABLE 3.6 Sample fares used in reference cases (average fares) TABLE 3.7 Short term reference case ridership/revenue impacts TABLE 3.8 Long term reference case ridership/revenue impacts TABLE 4.1 Key ridership development considerations TABLE 4.1A Strategic benefits of increased ridership (revenue neutral) TABLE 4.1B Strategic benefits of increased ridership (revenue investment) TABLE 4.2 Key ridership development considerations TABLE 4.3 Barrier 1 – customers travelling with 905 msps and the TTC pay two fares TABLE 4.4 Fare structure understandability issues/benefits TABLE 4.5 Fare concept benefits/issues by traveller type TABLE 4.6 Adaptability analysis TABLE 4.7 Concepts and demand distribution TABLE 4.8 Concepts impacts on future services TABLE 4.9 Fare structure support for seamless service planning TABLE 4.10 What data can be collected from the concepts? TABLE 4.11 Strategic review of fare integration concepts TABLE 4.12 Strategic case conclusions TABLE 5.1 Economic appraisal assumptions TABLE 5.2 Economic appraisal summary (revenue neutral) TABLE 5.3 Economic appraisal summary (revenue investment) TABLE 5.4 Economic case concept analysis TABLE 6.1 DRAFT Financial appraisal results TABLE 7.1 Concept 1 deliverability review TABLE 7.2 Technology risk review TABLE 7.3 Understandability risks TABLE 7.4 Pricing risks TABLE 7.5 Payment options for fare integration concepts TABLE 7.6 Change in Average Fare for Low Income Travellers TABLE 7.7 Deliverability and Operations Case Summary TABLE 8.1 Concept overall strengths and weaknesses TABLE 8.2 Business Case summary TABLE 8.3 What drives Business Case performance? TABLE 8.4 Key Design Considerations for Continued Structure Development TABLE 8.5 Key benefits and issues for the integrated fare structure Glossary BCA Business Case Analysis BCR Benefit Cost Ratio FBD Fare by Distance GHG Greenhouse Gas Emissions GO RER GO Regional Express Rail GTHA Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area LRT Light Rail Transit LUM Limited Use Media MSP Municipal Service Provider MTO Ministry of Transportation Ontario NPV Net Present Value OD Origin Destination PnR Park and Ride POP Proof of Payment RT Rapid Transit TAC Technical Advisory Committee TDM Transport Demand Management TTC Toronto Transit CommissionDRAFT TYSSE Toronto York Spadina Subway Extension VKT Vehicle Kilometers Travelled YRT York Region Transit DRAFT i GTHA Fare Integration - Preliminary Business Case Executive Summary Preface Steer Davies Gleave is pleased to submit this draft for discussion of the “Preliminary Business Case for Fare Integration in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area”. This Business Case has been prepared to provide technical input that supports Metrolinx in the development of a Fare Integration Strategy for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA). This report contains work completed from 2015 to 2017 that included engagement with Metrolinx and the region's municipal transit service providers through a “Technical Advisory Committee” (TAC). The findings in this report are presented as a draft for discussion and have not been endorsed as formal recommendations by Metrolinx or members of the TAC. Background The GTHA is undergoing rapid growth: by 2041 it is expected the region will be home to nearly 10 million people. This growth will occur in existing and new employment and activity centres, which will increase travel within and between the GTHA’s municipalities. In response to this growth, significant investment in public transit services and infrastructure is underway: • New Light Rail Transit (LRT) systems in Hamilton, Mississauga, and Toronto; Preliminary Business Cases are developed • The Toronto York Spadina Subway Extension (TYSSE), connecting to provide insight and York Region and Toronto; evidence that supports decision making. This • DevelopmentDRAFT and implementation of the PRESTO fare card system; Business Case is not and intended to serve as a detailed implementation • The GO Regional Express Rail (GO RER) Program, which will strategy or design transform the existing GO rail system from a commuter-oriented plan for potential fare structures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Creating Connections in Burlington
    CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE CITY OF BURLINGTON PETER ZUK, CHIEF CAPITAL OFFICER, METROLINX LESLIE WOO, CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER, METROLINX BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 30, 2017 CONGESTION COSTS OUR ECONOMY • The average commute in the GTHA is up to 60 minutes. That means the average commuter spends nearly an extra work day a week sitting in their car, stuck in traffic. Congestion is costing the GTHA between $6 BILLION - $11 BILLION A YEAR in lost economic activity. 2 METROLINX CAPITAL PROJECTS GROUP: FOCUS ON THE BUILD PLAN BUILD • Design • Environmental Assessment • Property Acquisition OPERATE • Procurement process • Contract Award • Construction 3 WHAT WE ARE BUILDING METROLINX PLANNED CAPITAL SPEND ASSETS TODAY OVER 10 YEAR PROGRAM $19.5 Billion* over $43 Billion** *March 2017, Audited **Metrolinx 17/18 Business Plan 4 Concrete Ties on the Stouffville Corridor, August 2017. AN INTEGRATED NETWORK 5 RER AND RT – NO SMALL TASK 6 GO RAIL EXPANSION 150 kilometers of new dedicated GO track will allow for more uninterrupted service New electric trains will travel faster for longer and reduce travel times Bridges and tunnels that eliminate intersections with rail and road traffic will provide more reliable GO train service New and improved stations will make your journey more comfortable, from start to finish New electrified rail infrastructure will allow Metrolinx to deliver faster, more frequent service 7 INFRASTRUCTURE 8 RER: NEW AND IMPROVED GO STATIONS As part of the RER Program, Metrolinx will modify and improve a large number of existing stations, build 12 new GO stations on the existing network, and 7 new stations on extensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station to Pearson Airport Train Schedule
    Union Station To Pearson Airport Train Schedule Ambrosius lisp her aplanospores organisationally, she sandpapers it unhandsomely. Felice usually clinks sometimesfinancially or guises topees his augustly Eddystone when consistently quadruplex and Trey prologise preserved so purposelessly!irremeably and intransitively. Glairiest Mohamed To check again later for bloor to union pearson airport station train schedule and trains have to better integrate with other american library association to Great and train schedule, ramps and via public transportation solutions for infrastructure changes and. Great service and price better than an Uber for sure. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, the audio mode is drill a card feature that offers enhanced accessibility. To pearson station? Toronto for about the same price as a GO Train ticket. Please wake your email. Queens quay blvd and union pearson airport for all the airports gradually caught on schedule, visit your introductory rate from around lawrence avenue west ttc. Express stations adhere to airports that meet you need. Led lighting and. Open once you may, nor are new station to train schedule. Until recently, Janesville, clean abate and flee to polite service. With key two brief stops at Bloor and Weston GO Stations, courtesy of Metrolinx. Great driver arrived right to union station is easy. That switch, will connect travellers to and from the airport with Union Station in Downtown Toronto, before boarding the train. Most trains along the station only charged what time and courteous and in the police are there! Major credit cards accepted for all purchases. Was ongoing to successfully purchase a ticket for the terrible train.
    [Show full text]
  • 416-393-INFO 3 Faxback Menu 6 Lost & Found Monthly Monthly Fill in the Boxes on Your Metropass in Pen
    DEF MNO Adult Student*** /Senior Child *** Adult Student*** /Senior 416-393-INFO 3 FaxBack Menu 6 Lost & Found Monthly Monthly Fill in the boxes on your Metropass in pen. Your Metropass is valid only with: GHI PRS Cash Metropass $93.50 $80.00 ADULTS require a TTC Metropass Photo I.D. OR a Driver’s Licence Photo I.D. 1 4 7 Cash $1.50 Cash Cash SENIORS require a TTC Senior’s Metropass Photo I.D. OR a Driver’s Licence Photo I.D. Single Fare Purchase $2.25 50¢ MDP by mail. Best value! Annual Annual Routes, Schedules & Maps Service Updates Multi-language Line 12 month subscription per month $85.75 per month $73.25 STUDENTSmust show a valid TTC Student Discount Card Photo I.D. ABC JKL Tickets or Tokens Tickets only 2 5 Tickets only Family Group Single ONLY Family/Group or Single Fares, Subway & GTA Info Escalators/Elevators Tokens/ 5- $9.00 5- $6.00 EXACT 24hr Transit Info 10 - FARE Day Pass SUNDAY & HOLIDAY - Good for up to6 persons, maximum 2 adults, Unlimited one-day travel on all regular TTC routes, good for Tickets $4.00 $7.50 with up to 4 children/youths*. (*Youths = 19 years of age or under.) ONE person. MONDAY to FRIDAY after 9:30am. SATURDAYS, 10 - $18.00 10 - $12.00 Unlimited one-day travel on regular TTC routes Sundays & Holidays . SUNDAYS, or STATUTORY HOLIDAYS from the start of service. Lost & Found: Located at Bay subway station, Monday - Accessible Buses: TTC accessible buses now serve many * TTC STUDENT DISCOUNT CARD must be shown or adult fare required.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Needs
    Chapter 2 – Transportation Needs 407 TRANSITWAY – WEST OF BRANT STREET TO WEST OF HURONTARIO STREET MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION 2.6.4. Sensitivity Analysis 2-20 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.7. Systems Planning – Summary of Findings 2-21 2. TRANSPORTATION NEEDS 2-1 2.1. Introduction 2-1 2.1.1. Background 2-1 2.1.2. Scope of Systems Planning 2-1 2.1.3. Study Corridor 2-1 2.1.4. Approach 2-2 2.1.5. Overview of the Chapter 2-2 2.2. Existing Conditions and Past Trends 2-2 2.2.1. Current Land Use 2-2 2.2.2. Transportation System 2-3 2.2.3. Historic Travel Trends 2-4 2.2.4. Current Demands and System Performance 2-5 2.3. Future Conditions 2-7 2.3.1. Land Use Changes 2-7 2.3.2. Transportation Network Changes 2-8 2.3.3. Changes in Travel Patterns 2-9 2.3.4. Future Demand and System Performance 2-10 2.4. Service Concept 2-13 2.4.1. Operating Characteristics 2-13 2.4.2. Conceptual Operating and Service Strategy 2-13 2.5. Vehicle Maintenance and Storage support 2-14 2.5.1. Facility Need 2-14 2.5.2. West Yard – Capacity Assessment 2-15 2.5.3. West Yard – Location 2-15 2.6. Transitway Ridership Forecasts 2-15 2.6.1. Strategic Forecasts 2-15 2.6.2. Station Evaluation 2-17 2.6.3. Revised Forecasts 2-18 DRAFT 2-0 . Update ridership forecasts to the 2041 horizon; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Escribe Agenda Package
    Community Planning, Regulation and Mobility Committee Meeting Agenda Date: December 8, 2020 Time: 9:30 am Location: Council Chambers - members participating remotely Pages 1. Declarations of Interest: 2. Statutory Public Meetings: Statutory public meetings are held to present planning applications in a public forum as required by the Planning Act. 3. Delegation(s): Due to COVID-19 this meeting will be conducted virtually. Only the chair of the meeting, along with a clerk and audio/visual technician, will be in council chambers, with all other staff, members of council and delegations participating in the meeting remotely. The meeting will be live webcasted, as usual, and archived on the city website. Requests to delegate to this virtual meeting can be made by completing the online delegation registration form at www.burlington.ca/delegate or by submitting a written request by email to the Clerks Department at [email protected] by noon the day before the meeting is to be held. All requests to delegate must contain a copy of the delegate’s intended remarks which will be circulated to all members of committee in advance as a backup should any technology issues occur. If you do not wish to delegate, but would like to submit feedback, please email your comments to [email protected]. Your comments will be circulated to committee members in advance of the meeting and will be attached to the minutes, forming part of the public record. 4. Consent Items: Reports of a routine nature, which are not expected to require discussion and/or debate. Staff may not be in attendance to respond to queries on items contained in the Consent Agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • BURLINGTON TRANSIT Five-Year Business Plan (2020-2024)
    Appendix A of TR-06-19 BURLINGTON TRANSIT Five-Year Business Plan (2020-2024) October 2019 – 19-9087 Table of Contents i Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 The Value of a Business Plan .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Burlington Transit – Past and Present ...................................................................................... 2 1.3 Alignment with Strategic Policy and Targets ........................................................................... 5 2.0 Policy Framework 6 2.1 Vision and Mission ................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Strategic Directions .................................................................................................................. 7 3.0 Growth Targets 10 3.1 Investing in Our Service ......................................................................................................... 11 4.0 The Plan 12 4.1 Strategic Direction 1 - Service Structure and Delivery ........................................................... 12 4.2 Strategic Direction 2 - Mobility Management ....................................................................... 19 4.3 Strategic Direction 3 - Customer Experience ......................................................................... 22 4.4 Strategic Direction 4 - Travel Demand Management ............................................................ 25 5.0 Organizational Structure and Staffing
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Transportation Indicators THIRD SURVEY
    Transportation Association of Canada Tel. (613) 736-1350 ~ Fax 736-1395 Tel. 2323 St. Laurent Blvd., Ottawa K1G 4J8 ISBN 978-1-55187-200-5 www.tac-atc.ca Toronto Montréal Vancouver Ottawa-Gatineau Calgary Edmonton Québec Winnipeg Hamilton London Kitchener-Waterloo St. Catharines-Niagara Halifax Victoria Windsor Oshawa Saskatoon Regina St. John’s Sudbury Saguenay Sherbrooke Abbotsford Kingston Trois-Rivières Saint John Thunder Bay February 2005 THIRD SURVEY Indicators Transportation Urban Transportation Association of Canada Transportation TAC REPORT DOCUMENTATION FORM Project No. Report No. Report Date IRRD No. Account# File# February 2005 Project Manager Katherine Forster Title and Subtitle Urban Transportation Indicators THIRD SURVEY Author(s) Corporate Affiliation (s) Brian Hollingworth IBI Group Neal Irwin Anjali Mishra Richard Gilbert Sponsoring/Funding Agencies and Addresses Performing Agencies Names and Addresses Urban Transportation Council IBI Group Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) 230 Richmond Street W., 5th Floor 2323 St. Laurent Blvd. Ottawa, ON K1G 4J8 Toronto, ON M5V 1V6 Abstract Keywords In 1993, the Urban Transportation Council (UTC) of the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) proposed a • Economics and New Vision for Urban Transportation, describing 13 principles which point the way to desirable future transportation Administration systems and related urban land use. The Council recognized that periodic surveys of transportation indicators • Traffic and Transport would be required to monitor progress towards achieving the Vision. To this end, a pilot survey that included eight Planning urban areas was carried out in 1995 using 1991 as the study year. This established baselines that would be used • Urban Area to compare with all future surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Burlington Transit Business Plan Update.Docx
    Appendix A: Transit’s Five-Year Business Plan Update Report: TR-03-19 This is a summary of the Burlington Transit Five-Year Business Plan peer review, vision and growth plan initiatives. The Business Plan document will be based on the details in this summary, with a focus on the implementation of the growth plan initiatives, including their phasing and financial impacts. Dillon Consulting requests the City of Burlington Council provide feedback on these sections, so that any changes may be incorporated into the final Business Plan. 1. Introduction The 2020 – 2024 Burlington Transit Business Plan will guide the implementation of transit service improvements over the next five years. The Business Plan starts with a policy framework that defines a clear direction for Burlington Transit, and clear steps on how to get there. Burlington Transit is working on a vision statement that will be part of the final Five-Year Business Plan. It is important to note that a Business Plan does not provide details service or operational planning. The primary purpose of the plan is to ensure individual strategies, projects and activities are aligned and contributing to the Burlington Transit’s vision and policy objectives. This includes prioritizing and staging key decisions to fit within the City’s financial guidelines. The Business Plan is also an important communication tool for Burlington Transit that will clearly set out steps required to move towards the long-term direction of the City. Over the next five-years, the Business Plan will form the guiding document in which all other operational decisions and financial budgets should be built around.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Fares in the GTHA Today
    Backgrounder Transit Fares in the GTHA Today – An Overview The current transit fares in the GTHA are determined by fare structures, concessions and products established independently by each of the agencies that provide transit services, as well as their policies for transfers between their services. Together, these arrangements produce an environment that functions well for much transit travel, but discourages travellers from using transit for certain types of trips. As transit travel in the region grows and more trips are made using more than one transit system, the deficiencies in the current arrangements will increasingly deter multi-agency transit travel. Transit Fares Transit fares in the GTHA are set by the agencies that provide transit services, which can be grouped into: • Municipal transit agencies (9) • GO Transit • UP Express Municipal Transit Agencies The fares for each GTHA municipal transit agency are set by each agency’s respective governing body—either the municipal council of the jurisdiction responsible for the service or a specialized board with some linkage to the municipal government. These municipal fares (See Table 1) cover local bus services, as well as streetcars, subways, and BRT in Toronto, Mississauga and York Region where such services exist. Some municipalities (Toronto, York Region) provide designated express bus services with premium fares. Intra-municipal fares generally have a flat structure, with the exception of York Region (which has 3 zones plus a buffer zone). Approaches to cross- boundary fares vary. Considered as a region, this functions as a zone system with each municipality serving as one zone (or multiple zones in York Region).
    [Show full text]
  • 5 2017 Transit System Performance Update
    Clause 5 in Report No. 4 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on March 29, 2018. 5 2017 Transit System Performance Update Committee of the Whole recommends: 1. Receipt of the presentation by Ann-Marie Carroll, General Manager, Transit, Transportation Services. 2. Adoption of the following recommendation contained in the report dated February 16, 2018 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. This report be received for information. Report dated February 16, 2018 from the Commissioner of Transportation now follows: 1. Recommendations It is recommended this report be received for information. 2. Purpose This report provides Council with 2017 York Region Transit (YRT) ridership and overall system performance information. 3. Background Transit measures service performance in a number of ways. Revenue and operating data is generated through a variety of software that is gathered into a business intelligence system. Reports are generated and used by staff to monitor system-wide performance, as well as making operational and financial decisions. Staff also monitors service in real-time to manage the day-to-day operation. The most common service performance measures used by the transit industry include: Committee of the Whole 1 Transportation Services March 1, 2018 2017 Transit System Performance Update • Revenue ridership - the number of paying travellers using the service. • Net cost per passenger – net cost to operate a route divided by the number of travellers • On-time performance – the reliability of the service provided to the traveller. This is a key indicator for the overall success of the Operation and Maintenance contracts • Revenue-to-cost ratio – revenue collected through transit fares compared to the cost to operate service 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Fare Integration
    EX28.6 REPORT FOR ACTION Advancing Fare Integration Date: October 16, 2017 To: Executive Committee From: City Manager Wards: All SUMMARY In July 2016, City Council considered a current state assessment of GO Transit fare policy and implications to ridership in Toronto (2016.EX16.1). The review outlined two proposals for Metrolinx’s consideration in the development of the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) Fare Integration Strategy in order to remove disincentives to short and medium distance trips on GO transit and support integration between transit services. First, reduce the base component and increase the distance component of GO fares; and second, extend the co-fare program (i.e. discount on double fares (GO- TTC))—currently offered to 905 transit agencies by Metrolinx—to TTC services. In July 2016, City Council also directed the City Manager to negotiate a discounted fare program with Metrolinx. In September 2017, Metrolinx updated its board on the GHTA Fare Integration Strategy. Metrolinx's board endorsed a step-by-step strategy to advance the goal of fare integration across the GTHA with four potential elements: • Discounts on double fares (GO-TTC) • Discounts on double fares (905-TTC) • Adjustments to GO’s fare structure • Fare Policy Harmonization This report provides an update on Metrolinx’s GTHA Fare Integration Strategy and provides the details of a proposed discount on double fares initiative between GO/Union Pearson Express (UP Express) and the TTC. A Term Sheet (Attachment 1) outlines the terms for an agreement between the City of Toronto, TTC and Metrolinx. The report recommends City Council adopt the Term Sheet (Attachment 1) and authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the CEO, TTC and the City Solicitor, to enter into an agreement with Metrolinx based on the terms outlined in Attachment 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices and Key Considerations For
    BEST PRACTICES AND KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR TRANSIT ELECTRIFICATION AND CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT TO DELIVER PREDICTABLE, RELIABLE, AND COST-EFFECTIVE FLEET SYSTEMS First Published JUNE 2020 Edition 2.0 SEPTEMBER 2020 AUTHORS Dr.Josipa Petrunic, President & CEO Dr. Elnaz Abotalebi, Researcher & Project Lead Dr. Abhishek Raj, Researcher c 2 COPYRIGHT © 2020 Information in this document is to be considered the intellectual property of the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium in accordance with Canadian copyright law. This report was prepared by the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium for the account of Natural Resources Canada. The material in it reflects the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium’s best judgment in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation. Any use that a third party makes of this report or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it are the responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. UPDATE: COVID-19 PUBLICATION IMPACT The publication of this report has been delayed by three months due to the COVID-19 global pandemic. This report, and the majority of research included within it, was completed primarily between September 2019 and March 2020 – prior to the novel coronavirus pandemic affecting local economies and transit revenue across Canada. While efforts have been made to include relevant announcements by Canadian transit agencies since that time, specifically as they relate to electric buses, many investment decisions and funding programs related to municipal green infrastructure deployments may change this year as a result of the financial crisis unfolding in cities across the country.
    [Show full text]