Water and Health Programme Course 1 - Introduction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dam 1 a Dam Is a Barrier That Impounds Water Or Underground Streams. Dams Generally Serve the Primary Purpose of Retaining Water
Dam 1 Dam A dam is a barrier that impounds water or underground streams. Dams generally serve the primary purpose of retaining water, while other structures such as floodgates or levees (also known as dikes) are used to manage or prevent water flow into specific land regions. Hydropower and pumped-storage hydroelectricity are often used in conjunction with dams to generate electricity. A dam can also be used to collect water or for storage of water which can be evenly distributed between locations. Hoover Dam, a concrete arch-gravity dam in Black Canyon of the Colorado River. Lake Mead in the background is impounded by the dam. Glen Canyon Dam Dam 2 A sideview of the Lake Vyrnwy dam, in Wales, finished in 1888 History The word dam can be traced back to Middle English,[1] and before that, from Middle Dutch, as seen in the names of many old cities.[2] Early dam building took place in Mesopotamia and the Middle East. Dams were used to control the water level, for Mesopotamia's weather affected the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, and could be quite unpredictable. The earliest known dam is the Jawa Dam in Jordan, 100 kilometres (62 mi) northeast of the capital Amman. This gravity dam featured an originally 9 m (30 ft) high and The Roman dam at Cornalvo in Spain has been in use for almost two millennia. 1 m (3 ft 3 in) wide stone wall, supported by a 50 m (160 ft) wide earth rampart. The structure is dated to 3000 BC.[3][4] The Ancient Egyptian Sadd-el-Kafara Dam at Wadi Al-Garawi, located about 25 km (16 mi) south of Cairo, was 102 m (335 ft) long at its base and 87 m (285 ft) wide. -
Copyrighted Material
Index Note: Page numbers in italics refer to figures and tables. 16R dune site, 36, 43, 440 Adittanallur, 484 Adivasi peoples see tribal peoples Abhaipur, 498 Adiyaman dynasty, 317 Achaemenid Empire, 278, 279 Afghanistan Acharyya, S.K., 81 in “Aryan invasion” hypothesis, 205 Acheulean industry see also Paleolithic era in history of agriculture, 128, 346 in Bangladesh, 406, 408 in human dispersals, 64 dating of, 33, 35, 38, 63 in isotope analysis of Harappan earliest discovery of, 72 migrants, 196 handaxes, 63, 72, 414, 441 skeletal remains found near, 483 in the Hunsgi and Baichbal valleys, 441–443 as source of raw materials, 132, 134 lack of evidence in northeastern India for, 45 Africa major sites of, 42, 62–63 cultigens from, 179, 347, 362–363, 370 in Nepal, 414 COPYRIGHTEDhominoid MATERIAL migrations to and from, 23, 24 in Pakistan, 415 Horn of, 65 related hominin finds, 73, 81, 82 human migrations from, 51–52 scholarship on, 43, 441 museums in, 471 Adam, 302, 334, 498 Paleolithic tools in, 40, 43 Adamgarh, 90, 101 research on stature in, 103 Addanki, 498 subsistence economies in, 348, 353 Adi Badri, 498 Agara Orathur, 498 Adichchanallur, 317, 498 Agartala, 407 Adilabad, 455 Agni Purana, 320 A Companion to South Asia in the Past, First Edition. Edited by Gwen Robbins Schug and Subhash R. Walimbe. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 0002649130.indd 534 2/17/2016 3:57:33 PM INDEX 535 Agra, 337 Ammapur, 414 agriculture see also millet; rice; sedentism; water Amreli district, 247, 325 management Amri, -
Model Test Paper-1
MODEL TEST PAPER-1 No. of Questions: 120 Time: 2 hours Codes: I II III IV (a) A B C D Instructions: (b) C A B D (c) A C D B (A) All questions carry equal marks (d) C A D B (B) Do not waste your time on any particular question 4. Where do we find the three phases, viz. Paleolithic, (C) Mark your answer clearly and if you want to change Mesolithic and Neolithic Cultures in sequence? your answer, erase your previous answer completely. (a) Kashmir Valley (b) Godavari Valley (c) Belan Valley (d) Krishna Valley 1. Pot-making, a technique of great significance 5. Excellent cave paintings of Mesolithic Age are found in human history, appeared first in a few areas at: during: (a) Bhimbetka (b) Atranjikhera (a) Early Stone Age (b) Middle Stone Age (c) Mahisadal (d) Barudih (c) Upper Stone Age (d) Late Stone Age 6. In the upper Ganga valley iron is first found associated 2. Which one of the following pairs of Palaeolithic sites with and areas is not correct? (a) Black-and-Red Ware (a) Didwana—Western Rajasthan (b) Ochre Coloured Ware (b) Sanganakallu—Karnataka (c) Painted Grey Ware (c) Uttarabaini—Jammu (d) Northern Black Polished Ware (d) Riwat—Pakistani Punjab 7. Teri sites, associated with dunes of reddened sand, 3. Match List I with List II and select the answer from are found in: the codes given below the lists: (a) Assam (b) Madhya Pradesh List I List II (c) Tamil Nadu (d) Andhra Pradesh Chalcolithic Cultures Type Sites 8. -
Kenoyer2004 Wheeled Vehicles of the Indus Valley Civilization.Pdf
1 Kenoyer, J. M. 2004 Die KalTen der InduskuItur Pakistans und Indiens (Wheeled Vehicles oftbe Indus Valley Civilization of Pakistan and India). In Bad unil Wagen: Der Ursprung einer Innovation Wagen im Vorderen Orient und Europa (Wheel and Wagon - origins ofan innovation), edited by M" Fansa and S. Burmeister, pp. 87-106. Mainz am Rhein, Verlagg Philipp von Zabem. Wheeled Vehicles of the Indus Valley Civilization of Pakistan and India. By Jonathan Mark Kenoyer University of Wisconsin- Madison Jan 7,2004 Introduction The Indus valley of northwestern South Asia has long been known as an important center for the emergence of cities and urban society during the mid third millennium Be. However, it is only in the last two decades that new and more detailed scientific excavations and analysis have begun to reveal the complex processes through which these urban centers emerged (Kenoyer 1998, 2003, Posseh12002). In this paper I will focus on the early use and gradual development of wheeled vehicles at the site of Harappa, Pakistan, in order to better understand the role of carts in this process of urban development. The earliest Neolithic communities that emerged along the edges of the Indus VaIley around 7000 Be do not reveal the use of wheeled vehicles Oarrige et al. 1995; Jarrige and Meadow 1980), but as sedentary farming communities became established out in the alluvial plain of the Indus river and its tributaries (Figure 1), more effective means of transporting heavy raw material would have been a major concern. In the alluvial plains that make up the core area of the later Indus civilization no rock is available exceptin the region around the Rohri Hills, Sindh. -
South Asian Archaeology 2012
South Asian Archaeology 2012 21st EASAA Conference / 21ème colloque de l’EASAA Paris, 2nd-6th July 2012 / 2-6 juillet 2012 Ecole du Louvre Organisation Avec le soutien de / with the support of et du / and of Transporteur officiel / Offical carrier President Dr. Vincent Lefèvre Comité d’organisation / Organisation committee Vincent Lefèvre, Bérénice Bellina-Pryce, Sophie Mouquin Comité de selection / Bérénice Bellina-Pryce, Laurianne Bruneau, Aurore Didier, Vincent Lefèvre, Edith Parlier-Renault, Amina Taha Hussein Okada South Asian Archaeology 2012 - Abstracts Nota: the following abstracts are reproduced in the form in which they have been submitted by the participants; no editiing work has been undertaken and we are not responsible for any inconsistencies in the spelling of proper nouns. Keynote lecture: Jean-François Jarrige Indus-Oxus Civilisations: More Thoughts Some thirty years ago excavations in the north-west of Afghanistan, in Tadjikistan and Uzbekistan (Bactria) and later on in Turkmenistan (Margiana) revealed the existence of a so far unknown extensive original cultural complex whose climax could be dated around 2100/1900 BC. Since then excavations of major sites such as Gonur, Togolok or Sappali Tepe have contributed to show the obvious economical dynamism and the great wealth what has been termed by some specialists as the Bactria-Margina Archaeological Complex (BMAC) or by others as the Oxus civilisation. So, some of the few “exotic” objects found at several sites of the Indus civilisation, could be then related to this “Oxus” civilisation and no longer to rather poorly known invaders in the context of what was assumed to be the collapsing process of the Indus cities. -
Royal “Chariot” Burials of Sanauli Near Delhi and Archaeological Correlates of Prehistoric Indo-Iranian Languages
ROYAL “CHARIOT” BURIALS OF SANAULI NEAR DELHI AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF PREHISTORIC INDO-IRANIAN LANGUAGES Asko Parpola University of Helsinki The article describes the royal cart burials excavated at the Late Harappan site of Sanauli near Delhi in the spring of 2018 on the basis of the available reports and photographs. The author then comments on these finds, dated to about 1900 BCE, with the Sanauli cart burials being the first of their kind in Bronze Age India. In his opinion, several indications suggest that the Sanauli “chariots” are actually carts yoked to bulls, as in the copper sculpture of a bull-cart from the Late Harappan site of Daimabad in Maharashtra. The antennae-hilted swords associated with the burials suggest that these bull-carts are likely to have come from the BMAC or the Bactria and Margiana Archaeological Complex (c.2300–1500 BCE) of southern Central Asia, from where there is iconographic evidence of bull-carts. The ultimate source of the Sanauli/BMAC bull-carts may be the early phase of the Sintashta culture in the Trans-Urals, where the chariot (defined as a horse-drawn light vehicle with two spoked wheels) was most probably invented around the late twenty-first century BCE. The invention presupposes an earlier experimental phase, which started with solid-wheeled carts that could only be pulled by bulls. An intermediate phase in the develop- ment is the “proto-chariot” with cross-bar wheels, attested in a BMAC-related cylinder seal from Tepe Hissar III B in northern Iran (c.2000–1900 BCE). The wooden coffins of the Sanauli royal burials provide another pointer to a possible Sintashta origin. -
4 a Decade of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archreology in India, 1951-1960
4 A Decade of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archreology in India, 1951-1960 B. B. LAL INTRODUCTION That the Asian Perspectives has decided to include within its compass the coun tries of India, Pakistan and Ceylon is welcome news, and its Editor, Professor Wilhelm G: Solheim II, deserves to be congratulated on his breadth of vision, for there is no gainsaying that archreological discoveries in these countries not unoften have a bearing on their counterparts in the land segregated as 'Far East'. Indeed, is not the influence of Buddhism on various cultural aspects-metaphysical as well as material-ofthe life ofthe people in eastern Asia a matter ofcommon knowledge? Or, is not a visitor to the temples at Angkor reminded of their Hindu prototypes in India? Though no doubt less known, yet in no way less significant, are the simila rities between the Early Stone Age 'chopper-chopping' tools (Fig. 2) or the (? Neolithic) shouldered axes (Fig. 6) from India and their counterparts in eastern Asia. In the case ofthe shouldered axes, for all one knows, the influence might have travelled in the reverse direction, from eastern Asia to India. Thus, it is hoped that other readers too of the Asian Perspectives will regard this Indo-Pak-Ceylon 'intrusion' as a not unwelcome event. Elsewhere in this issue is a summary of the archreological work done in India during the year 1961-62; and it is understood that relevant issues in future will also be having similar yearly reviews. Thus, in order that the readers may grasp the significance of these yearly discoveries and place them in the right perspective, it is felt that a resume, of necessity very general in nature, ofthe recent developments in the prehistoric and protohistoric archreology of the country may be placed before them. -
Unit-2 Hunter-Gatherers and Early Farming Cultures
Unit-2 Hunter-Gatherers and Early Farming Cultures Index: 2.0 Objectives 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Presentation of Subject Matter 2.2.1 Section 1: Paleolithic and Mesolithic a) Paleolithic b) Mesolithic 2.2.2 Section 2: Neolithic and Chalcolithic a) Neolithic b) Chalcolithic 2.2.3 Section 3: Harappa Civilization a) Town planning and Houses b) Political and Economical condition c) Social and Religious condition 2.2.4 Section 4: Megalithic a) Concept and various types b) Megalithic stone circles in Maharashtra 2.3 Summary 2.4 Terms to Remember 2.5 Answers to check your progress 2.6 Exercise 2.7 References for Further Study 32 2.0 Objectives In this chapter, we would understand- • What does Prehistory or Stone Age mean? What was the lifestyle, settlement pattern and subsistence economy of this early man? • What is Chalcolithic or Protohistory? • What were the highlights of Harappan Civilization? • What is Megalithic period? 2.1 Introduction Prehistoric period means the earliest period of the history of mankind. This period is also called as 'Stone Age', comprising, sub periods, from Paleolithic to Neolithic. The Neolithic period was a revolutionary one. After Neolithic period, copper replaced earlier stone tools. We witness emergence of earliest villages in this period. This period is called as 'Chalcolithic period'. During this period, India was dotted with numerous villages; however, some of them in northwestern part of India witnessed remarkable progress. It is first urbanization of India and known as 'Harappa Civilization'. This period is also known as 'Indian Protohistory'. After this, we find a different culture which was expert in Iron-metallurgy. -
Pictograph and Petroglyphs of Saravan (Sistan Ancient Asia - Baluchistan, Iran)
Sarhaddi, F 2013 Pictograph and Petroglyphs of Saravan (Sistan Ancient Asia - Baluchistan, Iran). Ancient Asia, 4: 3, pp. 1-8, DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.5334/aa.12312 RESEARCH PAPER Pictograph and Petroglyphs of Saravan (Sistan - Baluchistan, Iran) Fereshteh Sarhaddi* Rock art is one of the richest cultural resources in the world which depicts the earliest expression of human beliefs and ideas. It is a form of visual non-verbal communication. Rock art is broadly divided into two categories: (a) Pictograph or the pigmented art (b) Petroglyph or extractive art. In Baluchistan both Pictograph and Petroglyph have been identified in great numbers but rock art studies in Baluchistan have been received little attention. The main purpose of this paper is to introduce rock art of Saravan as a rich cultural heritage which needs systematic and scientific study and protection. Protection of rock art sites is itself an important task and proper conservation through technical discipline is most essential. Rock arts are fragile resources of cultural property and it must be conserved, studied and protect and familiarize the general public with the importance of them to be saved and enjoyed for a long time. Introduction was studied by Judith. T. Marucheck (1979) who later con- Sistan-Baluchistan province is located in South-East of ducted a systematic archaeological investigation of that Iran, and it holds more than 11% of total area of the coun- region. Baluchistan may have been inhabited first during try and is the largest province in Iran. Its area is 187502 Pleistocene as proposed by Hume based on the Paleolithic square kilometers in which 179385 square kilometers is sites found in Ladiz valley and discovery of Ladizian tools belonged to Baluchistan, it is bordered by South Khorasan (Hume, 1976). -
Life in Harappan Civilization Activity Booklet
Life in Harappan Civilization This activity and trail book is designed to support the history, visual art curriculum in Indian schools and for general interest. The trail explores a selection of objects from this ancient civilization to understand the life in the Indus Valley. Time: 50 minutes life in Suitable for: 8 + years Access: The Trail begins on the Ground Floor in the Harappan Gallery.To complete the trail follow instructions Harappan in the book. Make sure you have a pencil and eraser with you. Enjoy! civilization activities and trails The Journey you are about to take! My name:......................................... About 5000 years ago, a highly advanced urban civilization called the Indus Valley or Harappan Civilization, Age:............................................ existed along the river Indus. Their towns were well planned and they had Who have I come with............. brick houses which were situated along the roads. .................................................... Every house was equipped with a staircase, a kitchen and several rooms. Their courtyards had wells, bathrooms and they had proper drainage systems. The Harappans wore ornaments made of gold, silver, ivory,shell, clay, semi-precious stones and others. They made figurines and toys and a variety of seals.They farmed the land near their cities, and grew wheat, barley, cotton, dates and other fruits. They traded with other world civilizations like Mesopotamia in Iraq &Iran. Published by Get ready to sail on the Indus river as this trail © National Museum, 2014 leads you on a voyage to discover Production: Sanjib Kumar Singh the ancient Harappan people and treasures in Publication Assistance : Yogesh Mallinathpur M. the National Museum. -
The Published Archaeobotanical Data from the Indus Civilisation, South Asia, C.3200–1500BC
Bates, J 2019 The Published Archaeobotanical Data from the Indus Civilisation, South Asia, c.3200–1500BC. Journal of Open Archaeology Data, 7: 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joad.57 DATA PAPER The Published Archaeobotanical Data from the Indus Civilisation, South Asia, c.3200–1500BC J. Bates University of Pennsylvania, US [email protected] The collection of this dataset of published archaeobotanical data from the Indus Civilisation (c.3200–1500BC) was carried out by the author as part of her doctoral work, and has continued up to October 2017. The dataset represents a systematic collation of all primary published macrobotanical data, regardless of their designation as ‘crop’, ‘fully domesticated’ or ‘wild/weedy’ species. The dataset comprises 63 sites and 339 ‘taxa’ (including less confidently identified elements such as ‘charred seed’). Data is presented as pres- ence/absence due to different sampling, quantification and data presentation practices. Keywords: archaeobotany; Indus Civilisation; South Asia; Bronze Age; macrobotanical; Harappan Funding statement: This paper developed out of research conducted while the author was a PhD student working as part of the Land, Water and Settlement project, which has been investigating human– environment relations in northwest India. It presents material gathered for a literature review that formed part of the author’s PhD dissertation, and expanded upon during her first post-doctoral position as Trevelyan research fellow at Selwyn College, University of Cambridge. The PhD research was funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), United Kingdom (Grant No. 1080510), and this paper has been written up while she has been a Post-doctoral Research Associate at the Joukowsky Institute for Archaeology and the Ancient World, Brown University, and published while she is a post doctoral fellow at the Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania. -
Civil/Architecture 2020
w w w. a n e b o o k s . c o m CIVIL ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING Structural Dynamics Architecture of Ancient Tamil Nadu Vibrations & Systems The Kallanai Dam Story Madhujit Mukhopadhyay Satyajit Ghosh, Manu Jaiswal Contents Contents A Historical Prelude, Chola Art and Architecture, Kallanai–The Grand Anaicut: A beacon of ancient Preface Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Free Vibration of Single Degree of Freedom System structural engineering, Quatinah Barrage / Lake Homs Dam, Syria, Proserpina Dam, Spain, Cornalvo Chapter 3 Forced Vibration of Single Degree of Freedom System Chapter 4 Numerical Methods In Dam, Spain, Kallanai Dam / Grand Anaicut, India, Sayamaike Dam, Japan, Tonnur Kere / Moti Talab Structural Analysis: Applied To Sdf Systems Chapter 5 Vibration of Two Degree of Freedom Dam, India, Kebar Dam, Iran, Almansa Dam, Spain, The Kollidam (Coleroon) Side Water Regulators, System Chapter 6 Free Vibration of Multiple Degrees of Freedom System Chapter 7 Forced 3D Model of The Cauvery regulators–Present Day Design, The Cauvery Regulators, Spillway Design Vibration Analysis of Multiple Degrees of Freedom System Chapter 8 Free Vibration Analysis of and Dam Sectioning, The Vennar Regulators, 3D Model of The Vennar Regulators–Present Day Continuous Systems Chapter 9 Forced Vibration of Continuous Systems Chapter 10 Dynamic Design, 3D Model of The Kollidam Side Water Regulators–Present Day Design, The Grand Anaicut Direct Stiffness Method Chapter 11 Vibration of Ship And Aircraft As A Beam Chapter 12 Finite Canal System, Structural Nuances