DOCSLIB.ORG

CPH Participants List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CPH Participants List ] PARTICIPANTS LIST Country Party/Organisation Last Name First Name Albania Ecological Youth Alliance Korance Franceska Albania Partia e Gjelber / Greens of Albania Lala Manjola Albania Partia e Gjelber / Greens of Albania Petanaj Edlir Andorra Verds d'Andorra / Andorra Greens Escoda Antonia Andorra Verds d'Andorra / Andorra Greens Escoda Marta Austria Die Grünen Jordan Gerhard Austria Die Grünen Medwedeff Alexandra Austria Die Grünen Meinhard-Schiebel Birgit Austria Die Grünen Petrovic Madeleine Austria Die Grünen Reimon Michel Austria Die Grünen Rossmann Bruno Austria Die Grünen Schwarz Jakob Austria Die Grünen Waitz Thomas Austria Director of Global 2000 / My voice against nuclear Kastenhofer Klaus Austria European Green Party Committee Vana Monika Austria Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Lunacek Ulrike Belarus Belarus Greens Herasimenka Yauhen Belgium Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Cavazzini Anna Belgium Bündnis 90/Die Grünen - Liaison Brussels Cerny Philipp Belgium Co-Chair Ecolo Deleuze Olivier Belgium Co-Chair European Green Party Lamberts Philippe Belgium Ecolo Bricmont Saskia Belgium Ecolo Brouir Claude Belgium Ecolo Coeurnelle Didier Belgium Ecolo Gerard Cecile Belgium Ecolo Mandouze Claire Belgium Ecolo Thelen Lionel Belgium Ecolo - GEF Lechat Benoit Belgium European Green Party Blasko Sandor Belgium European Green Party Davitt Ed Belgium European Green Party Frassoni Monica Belgium European Green Party Lauwers Cecile Belgium European Green Party Olmanst Cedric Belgium European Green Party Sala Gaia Belgium European Green Party Sandland Barry Belgium European Green Party Schwanewilms Peter Belgium European Green Party Suijkerbuijk Joline Belgium European Green Party Verheyen Ann Belgium European Green Party Maas Catherine Belgium Global Greens - GEF Behrend Juan Belgium Green European Foundation Barbalata Marina Belgium Green European Foundation Gewessler Leonore Belgium Green European Foundation Hovens Daan Belgium Green European Foundation Jonckheer Pierre Belgium Green European Foundation Murphy Andrew Belgium Greens/EFA in European Parliament Denkinger Joachim Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Aagaard Helle Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Brasier Pierre-Jean Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Kefferputz Roderick Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Keller Ska Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Knops Louise Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Marechal Aurelie Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Moyart Clementine Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Munichsdorfer Olaf Page 1 ] PARTICIPANTS LIST Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Prossliner Petra Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Sack Annabelle Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Schmitt Michael Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Scholze Philine Belgium Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Tsetsi Vula Belgium Groen Delbarre Anton Belgium Groen Dhondt Bart Belgium Groen Matthieu Saraswati Belgium Groen Meuleman Elisabeth Belgium Groen Staes Bart Belgium LMP Feher Daniel Bosnia and Herzegovina Nasa Stranka Somun-Krupalija Lejla Bulgaria Bulgarian Green Party Schmidt Atanas Bulgaria Bulgarian Greens Lazarov Plamen Bulgaria Bulgarian Greens Simov Valentin Bulgaria Zelenite - The Greens Sandov Borislav Croatia Zelena Lista Toth Vlasta Cyprus Cyprus Green Party Chrysostomou Eleni Cyprus Cyprus Green Party Theopemptou Evi Cyprus Young Cyprus Greens Neocleous Tatiana Czech Republic Strana Zelenych / Czech Greens Kolinska Petra Czech Republic Strana Zelenych / Czech Greens Liska Ondrej Czech Republic Strana Zelenych / Czech Greens Mirovsky Ondrej Denmark Biorefining Alliance Holmsgaard Anne Denmark CEO Industriens Pension Mortensen Laila Denmark CEVEA Hegelund Mikael Denmark CEVEA Rojan Hetav Denmark Director CEVEA Weise Kristian Denmark FOPA Tingstrøm Klinken Jens Anton Denmark Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Auken, MEP Margrete Denmark Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Boe Kira Denmark Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Schjønning Thomas Denmark Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Turunen, MEP Emilie Denmark Labour Organisation Knuppert Marie Louise Denmark Minister for Health Krag Astrid Denmark Minister for Trade and Investment Olsen Dyhr Pia Denmark Minister of Environment Auken Ida Denmark Researcher Magnussen Tue Denmark SF Baastrup, MP Anne Denmark SF Bech Poulsen, MP Lisbeth Denmark SF Berg Hanne Denmark SF el Mousti Hamid Denmark SF Elmeligy Rana Denmark SF Fanger Jakobsen Agnete Denmark SF Gotlieb Albrechtsen Annette Denmark SF Grolin Jesper Denmark SF Hagensen Jette Denmark SF Husmark Brigitte Denmark SF Ipsen Johnny Denmark SF Kromann Peter Denmark SF Morten Lund Torben Denmark SF Nikolajsen Mads Denmark SF Nørgaard Laue Biehl Denmark SF Pilegaard Nilofar Denmark SF Rask Kirstine Denmark SF Röd Rune Page 2 ] PARTICIPANTS LIST Denmark SF Rømer Søren Denmark SF Rømer Mrs Denmark SF Steen Maria Sacha Denmark SF Valentin Mette Denmark SF Gade, MP Steen Denmark SF Environment Advisor Hillgard Janus Denmark SF EU Advisor Herschend ChristoffersenJulie Denmark SF Event organiser Engholm Mads Denmark SF Executive Committee member Hansen Tonni Denmark SF International Secretary Donkin Dea Denmark SF Party Leader, Minister for Foreign Affairs Søvndal Villy Denmark SF Political Spokesperson Petersen, MP Jesper Denmark SF Secretary General Turid Leirvoll Denmark SF Vice Party Leader Tesfaye Mattias Estonia Eestimaa Rohelised Veber Triin Finland Minister of Environment Niinistö Ville Finland Vihreätt - De Gröna Airto Mikko Finland Vihreätt - De Gröna Bland Anne Finland Vihreätt - De Gröna Kahkonen Merja Finland Vihreätt - De Gröna Laturi Panu Finland Vihreätt - De Gröna Oksala Raimo Finland Vihreätt - De Gröna Remes Tanja Finland Vihreätt - De Gröna Sumuvuori Johanna Finland Vihreätt - De Gröna Tai Kaihsu Finland Vihreätt - De Gröna Viskari Tuomas Finland Kivimaki Iris France Deputy-Mayor Lyon Hémon Pierre France Europe Ecologie - Les Verts Brozio Brigitte France Europe Ecologie - Les Verts Delbos-Corfield Gwendoline France Europe Ecologie - Les Verts Federovsky Constantin France Europe Ecologie - Les Verts Franjou Patrick France Europe Ecologie - Les Verts le Boulicaut Jocelyne France Europe Ecologie - Les Verts Lipietz Alain France Europe Ecologie - Les Verts Minnaert Pierre France Europe Ecologie - Les Verts Ralli Evangelia France Europe Ecologie - Les Verts Serne Pierre France Europe Ecologie - Les Verts Sitbon-Gomez Stephane France Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Garoby Roccu France Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Normand Alice France Secretary General, European Green Party Cremers Jacqueline Sakartvelo's mtsvaneta partia / Georgian Greens Georgia Party Kiknadze Lela Sakartvelo's mtsvaneta partia / Georgian Greens Georgia Party Megrelishvili Giorgi Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Buning Emily Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Butikofer Reinhard Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Deist Felix Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Ifland Maja Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Knabe Wilhelm Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Lakner Sebastian Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Mamitzsch Sandra Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Ortlauf Daniela Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Rehl Mareike Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Sarrazin Manuel Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Scharfschwerdt Michael Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Spitz Malte Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Tietz Alexander Page 3 ] PARTICIPANTS LIST Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Trupel Helga Germany Co-Chair Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Harms Rebecca Germany ENGS Schmitz Ute Germany European Green Party Committee Baerbock Annalena Germany Federation of Young European Greens Reintke Terry Germany Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Häfner Gerald Germany HBöll Foundation Europe - GEF Weinber Claude Germany Gosau Bernd Germany Lahl Uwe Greece Ecologoi Prasinoi / Ecologist Greens Vrontisi Zoi Greece Oikologoi-Prasinoi Kikou Olga Greece Oikologoi-Prasinoi Longinidis Panagiotis Hungary Ecopolice Schmuck Erzsebet Hungary LMP Csiba Katalin Hungary LMP Eross Gabor Hungary LMP Javor Benedek Hungary LMP Joo Andras Hungary LMP Mezo Janos Hungary LMP Szabo Timea Ireland Comhaontas Glas Boyle Dan Ireland Comhaontas Glas Campbell Joan Ireland Comhaontas Glas Simpson Tommy Israel Green Movement Porat Sagit Italy European Green Party Rosmi Gervasoni Alice Italy Federazione dei Verdi Bonelli Angelo Italy Federazione dei Verdi Zanella Luana Italy Vice-President, European Youth Forum Scarpiello Luca Latvia LZP Treimanis Kristaps Lebanon Green Party of Lebanon Zaarour Nada Lebanon Lebanon Green Party Jaroush Najah Luxembourg déi gréng Jacoby Abbes Luxembourg déi gréng Michels Dan Luxembourg déi gréng Tex Roland Luxembourg déi gréng / FYEG Schaefers Nicolas Luxembourg Greens/EFA in the European Parliament Turmes Claude Malta Alternattiva Demokratika - the Green Party Azzopardi Lane Claire Malta Alternattiva Demokratika - the Green Party Briguglio Michael Moldova Partidul Ecologist din Moldova "Aliante Verde" Insuratelu Tania Moldova Partidul Ecologist din Moldova "Aliante Verde" Prohnitchi Anatolie Montenegro Positive Montenegro Djurovic Goran Montenegro Positive Montenegro Radovic Ana Netherlands De Groenen Pruijt Vanessa Netherlands De Groenen Sakhel Khaled Netherlands GroenLinks Cornelissen Marije Netherlands GroenLinks Eickhout Bas Bastiaan Netherlands GroenLinks Roufs Gijsbertus Netherlands GroenLinks Stuiver Marian Netherlands GroenLinks Suarez Inti Netherlands GroenLinks van Abshoven Pieter Netherlands GroenLinks
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 European Elections the Weight of the Electorates Compared to the Electoral Weight of the Parliamentary Groups
    2019 European Elections The weight of the electorates compared to the electoral weight of the parliamentary groups Guillemette Lano Raphaël Grelon With the assistance of Victor Delage and Dominique Reynié July 2019 2019 European Elections. The weight of the electorates | Fondation pour l’innovation politique I. DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN THE WEIGHT OF ELECTORATES AND THE ELECTORAL WEIGHT OF PARLIAMENTARY GROUPS The Fondation pour l’innovation politique wished to reflect on the European elections in May 2019 by assessing the weight of electorates across the European constituency independently of the electoral weight represented by the parliamentary groups comprised post-election. For example, we have reconstructed a right-wing Eurosceptic electorate by aggregating the votes in favour of right-wing national lists whose discourses are hostile to the European Union. In this case, for instance, this methodology has led us to assign those who voted for Fidesz not to the European People’s Party (EPP) group but rather to an electorate which we describe as the “populist right and extreme right” in which we also include those who voted for the Italian Lega, the French National Rally, the Austrian FPÖ and the Sweden Democrats. Likewise, Slovak SMER voters were detached from the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) Group and instead categorised as part of an electorate which we describe as the “populist left and extreme left”. A. The data collected The electoral results were collected list by list, country by country 1, from the websites of the national parliaments and governments of each of the States of the Union. We then aggregated these data at the European level, thus obtaining: – the number of individuals registered on the electoral lists on the date of the elections, or the registered voters; – the number of votes, or the voters; – the number of valid votes in favour of each of the lists, or the votes cast; – the number of invalid votes, or the blank or invalid votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Professionalization of Green Parties?
    Professionalization of Green parties? Analyzing and explaining changes in the external political approach of the Dutch political party GroenLinks Lotte Melenhorst (0712019) Supervisor: Dr. A. S. Zaslove 5 September 2012 Abstract There is a relatively small body of research regarding the ideological and organizational changes of Green parties. What has been lacking so far is an analysis of the way Green parties present them- selves to the outside world, which is especially interesting because it can be expected to strongly influence the image of these parties. The project shows that the Dutch Green party ‘GroenLinks’ has become more professional regarding their ‘external political approach’ – regarding ideological, or- ganizational as well as strategic presentation – during their 20 years of existence. This research pro- ject challenges the core idea of the so-called ‘threshold-approach’, that major organizational changes appear when a party is getting into government. What turns out to be at least as interesting is the ‘anticipatory’ adaptations parties go through once they have formulated government participation as an important party goal. Until now, scholars have felt that Green parties are transforming, but they have not been able to point at the core of the changes that have taken place. Organizational and ideological changes have been investigated separately, whereas in the case of Green parties organi- zation and ideology are closely interrelated. In this thesis it is argued that the external political ap- proach of GroenLinks, which used to be a typical New Left Green party but that lacks governmental experience, has become more professional, due to initiatives of various within-party actors who of- ten responded to developments outside the party.
    [Show full text]
  • Timetable for Green Party Autumn Conference Hove Centre, Hove Town Hall September 21St to 24Th 2006
    Timetable for Green Party Autumn Conference Hove Centre, Hove Town Hall September 21st to 24th 2006 Note – this timetable reflects the situation at 15/09/06; any changes will be notified on the timetable notice board at Conference Time Wednesday 20th September 1600 onwards Stalls set-up 1800 - 2000 Registration Time Thursday 21st September 0845 - 1900 Registration 0830 – 0930 Breakfast 1145 - 1415 Lunch 1745 - 2015 Dinner 0930 - 1030 Workshop on motions A5 (Policy committee report) & A7 (Disputes Resolution Committee report) Workshop on motion A1 (SOC report) Workshop on motions C02 (middle East) &C05 (Education Enabling Motion) Workshop on motions D05 (selection procedures review), D08 (GPRC selection), D09 (GPRC elected by postal ballot) 1030 - 1150 PLENARY – Motion A1, SOC report (1030-1135) and Emergency Motions (1135-1150) 1200 - 1250 Young Greens present their views on Green Party education policy, Francesca Richards The state of childhood, Peter Reeves, GP Education spokesperson Travellers in Education, Liz Wakefield Workshop on motion B1, Natural Resources Voting Paper Workshop on motions C03 (Use of NHS trained staff) & C09 (Education policy updates) Thursday 21st September (continued) 1300 - 1410 PANEL – What is Education for?, chair Peter Reeve, speakers Kevin Aveson (Steiner Schools fellowship) and Anne Rix (Education Otherwise), David Woollcombe (President, Peace Child International) 1420 - 1510 Faith Schools – why do we need them? – chair Matthew Follett What is higher education for? Richard Clarke Education for sustainability,
    [Show full text]
  • Panel 4 the ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN
    The ecological movement in Greece: organizational and electoral expression in Greece 1974-2009 Bouranta Vasiliki Phd Candidate, Faculty of Law, Economics and Politics, Department of Political Sciences Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Abstract In the European elections of June 2009 and for the first time in the electoral history of Greece the Ecologist Greens managed to elect one of their candidates as a representative in the European Parliament. In the early national elections of October that followed, the party gathered 2,53% of the votes cast in the territory, their largest share in their short history. The Party failed naturally to participate in the distribution of seats of the Greek Parliament; however this percentage of valid votes is for many an indication of the rise of a new eco-movement to the Greek political space. In Western Europe, and especially in developed industrialised countries such as Germany, France, Belgium, Great Britain etc., 'green' parties acquired stable electoral stream and managed in several cases to gain “access to power” and be able to shape policies regarding the environment and other wider social and economic problems of their country. However, this was not the case of Greece where the ecological movement did not manage to develop to the point to become an equal “player” to the political deliberation but was always present in the background. More specific, my research question is why was not the greek ecological movement able to establish a mass party like the Socialists and therefore “build” a steady electoral power and influence in the political life of Greece. I aspire to answer to that question based on theories of voting behaviour of the electorate, focusing on “issue voting” theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Electorates of Greenleft and the Party for the Animals Otjes, Simon; Krouwel, Andre
    University of Groningen Two shades of Green? The electorates of GreenLeft and the Party for the Animals Otjes, Simon; Krouwel, Andre Published in: Environmental Politics DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1067349 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2015 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Otjes, S., & Krouwel, A. (2015). Two shades of Green? The electorates of GreenLeft and the Party for the Animals. Environmental Politics, 24(6), 991-1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1067349 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 26-09-2021 Environmental Politics, 2015 Vol. 24, No. 6, 991–1013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1067349 Two shades of Green? The electorates of GreenLeft and the Party for the Animals Simon Otjesa* and André Krouwelb aDocumentation Centre Dutch Political Parties, Groningen University, The Netherlands; bDepartment of Communication Science/Kieskompas B.V., VU University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands The Netherlands has two electorally significant parties that might be con- sidered to be part of the ‘Green’ family: GreenLeft and the Party for the Animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • Motivation Letter
    Motivation letter Dear Member Organizations, I would like to introduce myself and my motivations in order to apply my candidacy as mem- ber of the committee of EGP. My name is Maria Peteinaki and I am member of the Greek ecologist Greens, since 2009, and since then, I am active in the young greens, and in FYEG. During 2014 I served as a member of the Council, as a delegate to EGP, as a member of the Executive committee of the Ecologist Greens and finally as a co-spokesperson for the Greek party for 5 months. I am an architect, I run my own office (www.oddworks.gr) and co-founder of Alternative Tours of Athens that aim at promoting an alternative view of the city through its modern life, young creators and social movements. I would like to apply as a candidate for member of the EGP council. The European Greens have always inspired me to keep myself active in politics, they have empowered me as a woman, and an activist. I consider myself more as an activist than a politician. In that sense, I try to be as close as possible to the grassroots movements in Greece. In that direction being involved with the Embros occupied theater, a space of intense discussion, political social and cultural action, kept me connected and aware. The Greens in Greece are at an important turning point. Before the elections the party was in a strangely disruptive situation, due to its internal problems but also the refusal of many to continue through the party’s majority decision to go to elections through SYRIZA.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgium and Its Green Parties at the Crossroads
    Belgium and its Green Parties at the Crossroads Article by Luc Barbé July 2, 2019 On May 26 2019, Belgians voted in national, regional and European elections and the results spoke to a country divided along regional and political lines. In the Flemish north, the right-wing forces dominated. In Brussels and the Walloon south, progressive parties made gains, leaving Belgium at an impasse at the federal level. One month after the vote, Luc Barbé surveys the political terrain to ask where Belgium’s Green parties now stand. From momentum brought by street movements to the challenge posed by “ecorealism”, Barbé picks apart the threads to explain the how the Greens fared, why they did not do better, and the roads that lie open from here. There are two Green parties in Belgium, one Dutch-speaking, Groen, and one French-speaking, Ecolo, which also has a small German-speaking section. The two parties work together closely, form a single political group in the federal Chamber of Representatives, and submit joint lists to the local elections in Brussels. But the results of Belgium’s Green parties often diverge. At the federal, regional and European elections that took place in Belgium on May 26 2019, Ecolo scored higher than Groen, as was the case in past elections. Groen received 9.8 per cent of Flemish votes for the federal Chamber of Representatives, an increase of 1.2 per cent. The result makes Groen the sixth largest party in Flanders, disappointing for a party that was polling at 15 per cent in the months running up May 26.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative European Party Systems
    COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN PARTY SYSTEMS Comparative European Party Systems, Second Edition, provides a comprehensive analysis across 48 party systems of party competition, electoral systems and their effects, and the classification of party systems and governments from 1945 through late-2018. The book consists of three parts. Part I provides a comparative and quantitative overview of party systems according to party families, patterns of party competition, electoral systems and their effects, and classification of party systems and governments. Part II consists of 38 detailed country profiles of longstanding democracies and of the European Union (plus nine profiles on regions such as in Spain and the UK), providing essential detail on the electoral systems, parties, party patterns and systems, dimensions of political competition, and governments. Part III provides an analysis of 10 additional country profiles of oscillating regimes such as Russia, Ukraine, and Balkan and Transcaucasus states. Comparative European Party Systems provides an excellent overview of topical issues in comparative election and party system research and presents a wealth of information and quantitative data. It is a crucial reference for scholars and students of European and comparative politics, elections, electoral systems, and parties and party systems. Alan Siaroff is Professor of Political Science at the University of Lethbridge, Canada. COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN PARTY SYSTEMS An Analysis of Parliamentary Elections Since 1945 Second Edition Alan Siaroff Second edition published 2019 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2019 Alan Siaroff The right of Alan Siaroff to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Sida Application
    SIDA APPLICATION VO1 2016-2018 Green Forum Pustegränd 1-3 118 20 Stockholm [email protected] ABBREVIATIONS AGF African Greens Federation AGP Albanian Green Party CDN Cooperation & Development Network of Eastern Europe CEMAT Centro Mesoamericano de Estudios sobre Tecnolgìa Apropriada, Guatemala CEPROCA Centro de Produccion, Promocion y Capacitacion, Bolivia CSO Civil Society Organization EE Eastern Europe EGP European Green Parties (The Green group of the EU Parliament) ENoPS European Network of Political Foundations EVS European Voluntary Service (Programme) FYEG Federation of Young European Greens GEF Green European Foundation (PAO for the Green Group in EU) GeYG Georgian Young Greens GGWN Global Greens Women’s Network Groen Flemish Greens LGBT (Q) Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transsexual (Questioning) NGO Non-Governmental Organization ODA Official Development Assistance PAO Politically Affiliated Organization PVE Partido verde ecología (The Bolivian Green Party) PME Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation PWC Price Waterhouse Coopers – Previous auditors of Green Forum PYPA Programme for Young Politicians in Africa Sage Accounting Software, used in AGF SDGs Sustainable Development Goals SGY Serbian Green Youth WF Westminster Foundation (UK). British found. handling PAO-support of British greens INDEX A. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION 4 B. PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION 5 2 1. SUMMARY PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION AND APPROACH 5 2. GREEN FORUM AND THE GREEN MOVEMENT 6 3. OVERALL CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS 7 4. ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS AND PARTNERS 8 4.1 Problem Analysis 8 4.2 Analysis of prospects for the programme’s feasibility 8 4.3 Analysis of cooperation partners and programmes 9 5. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND THE STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK 10 5.1 The revised Green Forum Strategy and the overall objectives of the programme 10 5.2 Indicators 11 5.3 Human Rights Based Approach 11 6.
    [Show full text]