DOCSLIB.ORG

Consilium.Europa.Eu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consilium.Europa.Eu dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN * List of persons and entities under EU restrictive measures over the territorial integrity of Ukraine List of Persons Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 1. Sergey Valeryevich DOB: 26.11.1972 Aksyonov was elected 'Prime Minister of Crimea' in the Crimean 17.3.2014 AKSYONOV, Verkhovna Rada on 27 February 2014 in the presence of pro-Russian POB: Beltsy (Bălţi), gunmen. His 'election' was decreed unconstitutional by the acting Sergei Valerievich now Republic of Ukrainian President Oleksandr Turchynov on 1 March 2014. He actively AKSENOV (Сергей Moldova lobbied for the 'referendum' of 16 March 2014 and was one of the Валерьевич АКСЁНОВ), co-signatories of the 'treaty on Crimea's accession to the Russian Serhiy Valeriyovych Federation' of 18 March 2014. On 9 April 2014, he was appointed acting AKSYONOV (Сергiй 'Head' of the so-called 'Republic of Crimea' by President Putin. On 9 Валерiйович АКСЬОНОВ) October 2014, he was formally 'elected' 'Head' of the so-called 'Republic of Crimea'. Aksyonov subsequently decreed that the offices of 'Head' and 'Prime Minister' be combined. Member of the Russia State Council. Since January 2017, member of the High Council of United Russia Party. For his involvement in the annexation process he has been awarded with Russian State order 'For Merit to the Fatherland' — first degree. * The texts on this document are for information only. They have no official or legal status in the form they are published here. The official publication is available on EUR-Lex website. 1/101 dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 2. Vladimir Andreevich DOB: 19.11.1956 As speaker of the Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of 17.3.2014 KONSTANTINOV Crimea, Konstantinov played a relevant role in the decisions taken by the POB: Vladimirovka ‘Supreme Council’ concerning the ‘referendum’ against territorial integrity (Владимир Андреевич (a.k.a. Vladimirovca), of Ukraine and called on voters to cast their votes in favour of Crimean КОНСТАНТИНОВ) Slobozia Region, independence in the ‘referendum’ of 16 March 2014. He was one of the Moldavian SSR (now Volodymyr Andriyovych co-signatories of the ‘treaty on Crimea's accession to the Russian Republic of Moldova) KONSTANTINOV Federation’ of 18 March 2014. or Bogomol, (Володимир Андрійович Moldavian SSR Since 17 March 2014 ‘Chairman’ of the ‘State Council’ of the so-called КОНСТАНТІНОВ) ‘Republic of Crimea’. 3. Rustam Ilmirovich DOB: 15.8.1976 As former Deputy Prime Minister of Crimea, Temirgaliev played a relevant 17.3.2014 TEMIRGALIEV (Рустам role in the decisions taken by the 'Supreme Council' concerning the POB: Ulan-Ude, Ильмирович 'referendum' of 16 March 2014 against the territorial integrity of Ukraine. Buryat ASSR ТЕМИРГАЛИЕВ) He lobbied actively for the integration of Crimea into the Russian (Russian SFSR) Federation. Rustam Ilmyrovych TEMIRHALIIEV (Рустам On 11 June 2014 he resigned from his function as 'First Deputy Prime Ільмирович ТЕМІРГАЛІЄВ) Minister' of the so-called 'Republic of Crimea'. Remains active in supporting separatist actions or policies. 2/101 dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 4. Denis Valentinovich DOB: 15.7.1974 Berezovskiy was appointed commander of the Ukrainian Navy 17.3.2014 BEREZOVSKIY on 1 March 2014 but thereafter swore an oath to the Crimean armed POB: Kharkiv, forces, thereby breaking his oath to the Ukrainian Navy. (Денис Валентинович Ukrainian SSR БЕРЕЗОВСКИЙ) He was then appointed Deputy Commander of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation. Denys Valentynovych BEREZOVSKYY (Денис Валентинович БЕРЕЗОВСЬКИЙ) 5. Aleksei Mikhailovich CHALIY DOB: 13.6.1961 Chaliy became 'People's Mayor of Sevastopol' by popular acclamation 17.3.2014 (Алексей Михайлович on 23 February 2014 and accepted this 'vote'. He actively campaigned for POB: Moscow or ЧАЛЫЙ) Sevastopol to become a separate entity of the Russian Federation Sevastopol following a referendum on 16 March 2014. He was one of the Oleksiy Mykhaylovych co-signatories of the 'treaty on Crimea's accession to the Russian CHALYY (Олексій Federation' of 18 March 2014. He was acting 'governor' of Sevastopol Михайлович ЧАЛИЙ) from 1 to 14 April 2014 and is a former 'elected' Chairman of the 'Legislative Assembly' of the City of Sevastopol. Member of the 'Legislative Assembly' of the City of Sevastopol. For his involvement in the annexation process he has been awarded with Russian State order 'For Merit to the Fatherland' — first degree. 3/101 dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 6. Pyotr Anatoliyovych ZIMA DOB: 18.1.1970 Zima was appointed as the new head of the Crimean Security Service 17.3.2014 (SBU) on 3 March 2014 by ‘Prime Minister’ Aksyonov and accepted this (Пётр Анатольевич ЗИМА) POB: Artemivsk appointment. He has given relevant information including a database to (Артемовск) (2016 Petro Anatoliyovych ZYMA the Russian Intelligence Service (FSB). This included information on renamed back to Euro-Maidan activists and human rights defenders of Crimea. He played (Петро Анатолійович Bakhmut/Бахмут), a relevant role in preventing Ukraine's authorities from controlling the ЗИМА) Donetsk Oblast, territory of Crimea. On 11 March 2014 the formation of an independent Ukraine Security Service of Crimea was proclaimed by former SBU officers of Crimea. 7.* 8. Sergey Pavlovych TSEKOV DOB: 28.9.1953 As Vice Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada of Crimea, Tsekov initiated, 17.3.2014 (Сергей Павлович ЦЕКОВ) or 28.8.1953 together with Sergey Aksyonov, the unlawful dismissal of the government of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea (ARC). He drew Vladimir Serhiy Pavlovych TSEKOV POB: Simferopol Konstantinov into this endeavour, threatening him with dismissal. He (Сергій Павлович ЦЕКОВ) publicly recognised that the MPs from Crimea were the initiators of inviting Russian soldiers to take over the Verkhovna Rada of Crimea. He was one of the first Crimean Leaders to ask in public for the annexation of Crimea to Russia. Member of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation from the so-called ‘Republic of Crimea’. * The entry was deleted on 10 March 2016 following a delisting decision. 4/101 dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 9. Viktor Alekseevich OZEROV DOB: 5.1.1958 Chairman of the Security and Defence Committee of the Federation 17.3.2014 Council of the Russian Federation. (Виктор Алексеевич POB: Abakan, Озеров) Khakassia On 1 March 2014 Ozerov, on behalf of the Security and Defence Committee of the Federation Council, publicly supported, in the Federation Council, the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine. 10. Vladimir Michailovich DOB: 29.9.1952 First Deputy-Chairman of the International Affairs Committee of the 17.3.2014 DZHABAROV Federation Council of the Russian Federation. (Владимир Михайлович On 1 March 2014 Dzhabarov, on behalf of the International Affairs Джабаров) Committee of the Federation Council, publicly supported, in the Federation Council, the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine. 11. Andrei Aleksandrovich DOB: 9.11.1972 Chairman of the Committee on Constitutional Law of the Federation 17.3.2014 KLISHAS Council of the Russian Federation. POB: Sverdlovsk (Андрей Александрович On 1 March 2014 Klishas publicly supported, in the Federation Council, Клишас) the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine. In public statements Klishas sought to justify a Russian military intervention in Ukraine by claiming that ‘the Ukrainian President supports the appeal of the Crimean authorities to the President of the Russian Federation on landing an all-encompassing assistance in defence of the citizens of Crimea’. 5/101 dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 12. Nikolai Ivanovich RYZHKOV DOB: 28.9.1929 Member of the Committee for federal issues, regional politics and the 17.3.2014 POB: Dyleevka, North of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation. (Николай Иванович Donetsk region, Рыжков) On 1 March 2014 Ryzhkov publicly supported, in the Federation Council, Ukrainian SSR the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine. 13. Evgeni Viktorovich DOB: 4.10.1958 Deputy Speaker of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation. 17.3.2014 BUSHMIN POB: Lopatino, On 1 March 2014 Bushmin publicly supported, in the Federation Council, (Евгений Викторович Sergachiisky region, the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine. Бушмин) RSFSR 14. Aleksandr Borisovich DOB: 3.4.1957 Member of the Committee of International Affairs of the Federation 17.3.2014 TOTOONOV Council of the Russian Federation. POB: Ordzhonikidze, (Александр Борисович North Ossetia On 1 March 2014 Totoonov publicly supported, in the Federation Council, Тотоонов) the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine. * 15. * The entry was deleted on 14 September 2017 following a delisting decision. 6/101 dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 16. Sergei Mikhailovich DOB: 14.2.1953 Member of the Council of the State Duma; Leader of Fair Russia faction 17.3.2014 MIRONOV in the Duma of the Russian Federation. POB: Pushkin, (Сергей Михайлович Leningrad region Initiator of the bill allowing Russian Federation to admit in its composition, Миронов) under the pretext of protection of Russian citizens, territories of a foreign country without the consent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Foreign Observation of the Illegitimate Elections in South Ossetia and Abkhazia in 2019
    FOREIGN OBSERVATION OF THE ILLEGITIMATE ELECTIONS IN SOUTH OSSETIA AND ABKHAZIA IN 2019 Anton Shekhovtsov FOREIGN OBSERVATION OF THE ILLEGITIMATE ELECTIONS IN SOUTH OSSETIA AND ABKHAZIA IN 2019 Anton Shekhovtsov Contents Executive summary _____________________________________ 4 Introduction: Illegitimacy of the South Ossetian “parliamentary” and Abkhaz “presidential elections” ___________ 6 “Foreign observers” of the 2019 “elections” in South Ossetia and Abkhazia ____________________________ 9 Established involvement of “foreign observers” in pro-Kremlin efforts __________________________________ 16 Assessments of the South Ossetian and Abkhaz 2019 “elections” by “foreign observers” _____________________ 21 Conclusion ___________________________________________ 27 Edition: European Platform for Democratic Elections www.epde.org Responsible for the content: Europäischer Austausch gGmbH Erkelenzdamm 59 10999 Berlin, Germany Represented through: Stefanie Schiffer EPDE is financially supported by the European Union and the Federal Foreign Office of Germany. The here expressed opinion does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the donors. Executive summary The so-called “Republic of South Ossetia” and “Republic of Abkhazia” are breakaway regions of Georgia that are recognised as independent sovereign states only by five UN Member States: Russia (which supports their de facto independence by military, economic and political means), Nauru, Nicaragua, Syria and Venezuela. Other entities that recognise South Ossetia and Abkhaz- ia as independent
    [Show full text]
  • List of Persons and Entities Under EU Restrictive Measures Over the Territorial Integrity of Ukraine
    dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN List of persons and entities under EU restrictive measures over the territorial integrity of Ukraine List of Persons Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 1. Sergey Valeryevich DOB: 26.11.1972. Aksyonov was elected 'Prime Minister of Crimea' in the Crimean 17.3.2014 AKSYONOV, Verkhovna Rada on 27 February 2014 in the presence of pro-Russian POB: Beltsy (Bălţi), gunmen. His 'election' was decreed unconstitutional by the acting Sergei Valerievich now Republic of Ukrainian President Oleksandr Turchynov on 1 March 2014. He actively AKSENOV (Сергей Moldova lobbied for the 'referendum' of 16 March 2014 and was one of the co- Валерьевич signatories of the ’treaty on Crimea´s accession to the Russian AKCëHOB), Federation’ of 18 March 2014. On 9 April 2014 he was appointed acting Serhiy Valeriyovych ‘Head’ of the so-called ‘Republic of Crimea’ by President Putin. On 9 AKSYONOV (Сергiй October 2014, he was formally ‘elected’ 'Head' of the so-called 'Republic Валерiйович Аксьонов) of Crimea'. Aksyonov subsequently decreed that the offices of ‘Head’ and ‘Prime Minister’ be combined. Member of the Russia State Council. 1/83 dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 2. Rustam Ilmirovich DOB: 15.8.1976 As former Deputy Minister of Crimea, Temirgaliev played a relevant role 17.3.2014 TEMIRGALIEV in the decisions taken by the ‘Supreme Council’ concerning the POB: Ulan-Ude, ‘referendum’ of 16 March 2014 against the territorial integrity of Ukraine. (Рустам Ильмирович Buryat ASSR He lobbied actively for the integration of Crimea into the Russian Темиргалиев) (Russian SFSR) Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Persons Who Wish to Seek Asylum in the Russian Federation
    INFORMATION FOR PERSONS WHO WISH TO SEEK ASYLUM IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION “Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in the other countries asylum from persecution”. Article 14 Universal Declaration of Human Rights I. Who is a refugee? According to Article 1 of the Federal Law “On Refugees”, a refugee is: “a person who, owing to well‑founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of particular social group or politi‑ cal opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country”. If you consider yourself a refugee, you should apply for Refugee Status in the Russian Federation and obtain protection from the state. If you consider that you may not meet the refugee definition or you have already been rejected for refugee status, but, nevertheless you can not re‑ turn to your country of origin for humanitarian reasons, you have the right to submit an application for Temporary Asylum status, in accordance to the Article 12 of the Federal Law “On refugees”. Humanitarian reasons may con‑ stitute the following: being subjected to tortures, arbitrary deprivation of life and freedom, and access to emergency medical assistance in case of danger‑ ous disease / illness. II. Who is responsible for determining Refugee status? The responsibility for determining refugee status and providing le‑ gal protection as well as protection against forced return to the country of origin lies with the host state. Refugee status determination in the Russian Federation is conducted by the Federal Migration Service (FMS of Russia) through its territorial branches.
    [Show full text]
  • International Crimes in Crimea
    International Crimes in Crimea: An Assessment of Two and a Half Years of Russian Occupation SEPTEMBER 2016 Contents I. Introduction 6 A. Executive summary 6 B. The authors 7 C. Sources of information and methodology of documentation 7 II. Factual Background 8 A. A brief history of the Crimean Peninsula 8 B. Euromaidan 12 C. The invasion of Crimea 15 D. Two and a half years of occupation and the war in Donbas 23 III. Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court 27 IV. Contextual elements of international crimes 28 A. War crimes 28 B. Crimes against humanity 34 V. Willful killing, murder and enforced disappearances 38 A. Overview 38 B. The law 38 C. Summary of the evidence 39 D. Documented cases 41 E. Analysis 45 F. Conclusion 45 VI. Torture and other forms of inhuman treatment 46 A. Overview 46 B. The law 46 C. Summary of the evidence 47 D. Documented cases of torture and other forms of inhuman treatment 50 E. Analysis 59 F. Conclusion 59 VII. Illegal detention 60 A. Overview 60 B. The law 60 C. Summary of the evidence 62 D. Documented cases of illegal detention 66 E. Analysis 87 F. Conclusion 87 VIII. Forced displacement 88 A. Overview 88 B. The law 88 C. Summary of evidence 90 D. Analysis 93 E. Conclusion 93 IX. Crimes against public, private and cultural property 94 A. Overview 94 B. The law 94 C. Summary of evidence 96 D. Documented cases 99 E. Analysis 110 F. Conclusion 110 X. Persecution and collective punishment 111 A. Overview 111 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 152/Thursday, August
    46302 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 152 / Thursday, August 7, 2014 / Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: information to be collected; (d) ways to (www.treasury.gov/ofac). Certain general Requests for additional information or minimize the burden of the collection of information pertaining to OFAC’s copies of the form(s) and instructions information on respondents, including sanctions programs is available via should be directed to Gary Swasey, through the use of automated collection facsimile through a 24-hour fax-on- Customer Service Branch, P.O. Box 603, techniques or other forms of information demand service, tel.: 202/622–0077. Philadelphia, PA 19154, (215) 516– technology; and (e) estimates of capital Notice of OFAC Actions 8145. or start-up costs and costs of operation, On March 17, 2014, OFAC blocked SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: maintenance, and purchase of services the property and interests in property of Title: Claim Against the United States to provide information. the following four individuals pursuant for the Proceeds of a Government Check. Dated: July 31, 2014. to E.O. 13660: OMB Control Number: 1530–0010 Bruce A. Sharp, 1. AKSYONOV, Sergey Valeryevich (Previously approved as 1510–0019 as a Bureau Clearance Officer. collection conducted by Department of (a.k.a. AKSENOV, Sergei; a.k.a. [FR Doc. 2014–18512 Filed 8–6–14; 8:45 am] AKSYONOV, Sergei; a.k.a. the Treasury/Financial Management BILLING CODE 4810–35–P Service.) AKSYONOV, Sergey; a.k.a. Transfer of OMB Control Number: The AKSYONOV, Sergiy; a.k.a. Bureau of Public Debt (BPD) and the DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY AKSYONOV, Serhiy Valeryevich); Financial Management Service (FMS) DOB 26 Nov 1972; POB Balti, have consolidated to become the Bureau Office of Foreign Assets Control Moldova (individual) [UKRAINE].
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Relations
    Foreign relations STU MTF forms cooperation on the basis of good partnership relations which are typified by mutual cooperation, profit in the area of research activities, or experience in education. The active cooperation of our constitution, reflected in agreements concluded with foreign partners, is proof of the necessity for searching new partnerships and cooperation. Institutes which signed contracts of cooperation with the Faculty: Agreements on cooperation with Foreign Partners Foreign Partner Country City/Town Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden Germany Rossendorf Technical University of Brandenburg Germany Cottbus Leibniz-Institute for Solid State and Materials Research Dresden Germany Dresden Anhlat University of Applied Sciences Germany Koethen Faculty of Machining, University in Ljubljana Slovenia Ljubljana St. Petersburg State University of Engineering and Electrotechnics Russia Saint-Petersburg Institute of Energy in Moscow Russia Moscow Buehler GmbH Germany Düsseldorf Ukrainian Academy of Engineering and Pedagogy Ukraine Charkov Faculty of Applied Informatics and Robotechnology, UGATU UFA Russia Ufa Faculty of Economics, Management and Finances UGATU UFA Russia Ufa National Institute of R & D for Materials Physics Romania Bucharest Faculty of Physics, University of Bucharest Romania Bucharest University of Science and Technology in Pohang South Korea Pohang Faculty of Organisation and Informatics, University of Zagreb Croatia Zagreb Bekaert Belgium Zwevegem Faculty of Machine Building, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca Romania Cluj-Napoca
    [Show full text]
  • Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 18 June 2015
    General Coordination Meeting – Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 18 June 2015 Discussion Action Points/Decisions 1. Summary of steps taken based on decisions of the previous meeting by UN OCHA OCHA to follow up on the implications of new Temporary Order of entry/exit to NGCAs for humanitarian cargo UN OCHA summarized activities based on the decisions of the last General Coordination Meeting. The movement. issue of unaccompanied minors is being addressed both at oblast and national levels. WHO keeps checking if tuberculin was delivered to all raions of the oblast. For the moment, it is confirmed that Bilovodsk, Milove and Markivka raions and Lysychansk didn’t receive it. WHO and UN OCHA had the meetings with the authorities in Bilovodsk, Milove and Markivka raions. The maternity hospital in Bilovodsk serves three raions and many women come for delivery from NGCAs of the oblast. The authorities asked to support the hospital with hygiene kits both for women and for newborns. At the national level UN OCHA continues to provide support in the development of the Law on “humanitarian assistance”. It is expected that the draft is finalized by June 30 and then passed for discussion to the Parliament of Ukraine. As of today only 30% of required funding has been funded or pledged as part of Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP). The new Temporary Order on entry/exit to NGCAs has been adopted and came into force. For the moment no commercial cargoes are permitted to NGCAs due to security situation. 2. Update of the current humanitarian situation in Oblast from UN OCHA and LOMCA SES to share the estimated costs of transition center with the humanitarian partners for their participation in The number of officially registered IDPs is growing despite of difficulties in crossing the contact line.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Progress Report
    EU Support to the East of Ukraine – Recovery, Peacebuilding and Governance Annual Progress Report August 2018 – September 2019 EU Support to the East of Ukraine – Recovery, Peacebuilding and Governance Annual Progress Report August 2018 – September 2019 Table of contents List of annexes 5 Abbreviations and acronyms 6 Executive summary 7 Background 12 COMPONENT 1 16 LOCAL GOVERNANCE AND DECENTRALISATION REFORM Result 1.1 Nationwide decentralisation reform is fully implemented in the newly established Amalgamated Territorial Communities (ATCs) in areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblast under the 18 control of the Government Result 1.2 Access to quality administrative and social services is improved 26 Result 1.3 Government capacity for participatory strategic planning and transparent project 30 implementation is enhanced. COMPONENT 2 36 ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND MSMES DEVELOPMENT REFORM Result 2.1 Network of service providers is established, and market access improved 38 Result 2.2 Access to credit and financing is improved and more flexible in Complement to KFW 43 Result 2.3 Provision of technical and vocational training is of increasing quality.. 46 COMPONENT 3 52 COMMUNITY SECURITY AND SOCIAL COHESION Result 3.1. A network of citizen groups is established to promote social cohesion and sustainable 54 socio-economic development. Result 3.2 Citizen group initiatives are financially supported. 77 COMPONENT 4 79 SECTORAL REFORMS AND STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENTS (HEALTH) Result 4.1 The regional health care system is effectively functioning at the regional
    [Show full text]
  • The Kremlin's Irregular Army: Ukrainian Separatist Order of Battle
    THE KREMLIN’S IRREGULARY ARMY: UKRAINIAN SEPARATIST ORDER OF BATTLE | FRANKLIN HOLCOMB | AUGUST 2017 Franklin Holcomb September 2017 RUSSIA AND UKRAINE SECURITY REPORT 3 THE KREMLIN’S IRREGULAR ARMY: UKRAINIAN SEPARATIST ORDER OF BATTLE WWW.UNDERSTANDINGWAR.ORG 1 Cover: A Pro-Russian separatist sits at his position at Savur-Mohyla, a hill east of the city of Donetsk, August 28, 2014. REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing or from the publisher. ©2017 by the Institute for the Study of War. Published in 2017 in the United States of America by the Instittue for the Study of War. 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 515 | Washington, DC 20036 understandingwar.org 2 Franklin Holcomb The Kremlin’s Irregular Army: Ukrainian Separatist Order of Battle ABOUT THE AUTHOR Franklin Holcomb is a Russia and Ukraine Research Analyst at the Institute for the Study of War where he focuses on the war in Ukraine, Ukrainian politics, and Russian foreign policy in Eastern Europe. His current research focuses on studying the development of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Russian-backed separatist formations operating in Eastern Ukraine, as well as analyzing Russian political and military activity in Moldova, the Baltic, and the Balkans. Mr. Holcomb is the author of “The Order of Battle of the Ukrainian Armed Forces: A Key Component in European Security,” “Moldova Update: Kremlin Will Likely Seek to Realign Chisinau”, “Ukraine Update: Russia’s Aggressive Subversion of Ukraine,” as well as ISW’s other monthly updates on the political and military situation in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crimean Tatar Question: a Prism for Changing Nationalisms and Rival Versions of Eurasianism*
    The Crimean Tatar Question: A Prism for Changing Nationalisms and Rival Versions of Eurasianism* Andrew Wilson Abstract: This article discusses the ongoing debates about Crimean Tatar identity, and the ways in which the Crimean Tatar question has been crucial to processes of reshaping Ukrainian identity during and after the Euromaidan. The Crimean Tatar question, it is argued, is a key test in the struggle between civic and ethnic nationalism in the new Ukraine. The article also looks at the manner in which the proponents of different versions of “Eurasianism”—Russian, Volga Tatar, and Crimean Tatar—have approached the Crimean Tatar question, and how this affects the attitudes of all these ethnic groups to the Russian annexation of Crimea. Key words: Crimean Tatars, Euromaidan, Eurasianism, national identity, nationalism—civic and ethnic Introduction In the period either side of the Russian annexation of Crimea, the Crimean Tatar issue has become a lodestone for redefining the national identities of all the parties involved. The mainstream Crimean Tatar movement has been characterized by steadfast opposition first to the Yanukovych regime in Ukraine and then to Russian rule. This position has strengthened its longstanding ideology of indigenousness and special rights, but it has also * The author is extremely grateful to Ridvan Bari Urcosta for his invaluable help with research for this article, to Bob Deen and Zahid Movlazada at the OSCE HCNM, to Professor Paul Robert Magocsi, and to the anonymous reviewers who made useful comments and criticisms. 1 2 ANDREW WILSON belatedly cemented its alliance with Ukrainian nationalism. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s would‐be new supra‐ethnic civic identity draws heavily on the Crimean Tatar contribution.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Persons and Entities Under EU Restrictive Measures Over the Territorial Integrity of Ukraine
    dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN 1st December 2014 List of persons and entities under EU restrictive measures over the territorial integrity of Ukraine List of persons N. Name Identifying Reasons Date of information listing 1. Sergey Valeryevich d.o.b. 26.11.1972 Aksyonov was elected “Prime Minister of Crimea” in the Crimean Verkhovna Rada on 27 17.3.2014 Aksyonov February 2014 in the presence of pro-Russian gunmen. His “election” was decreed unconstitutional by Oleksandr Turchynov on 1 March. He actively lobbied for the “referendum” of 16 March 2014. 2. Vladimir Andreevich d.o.b. 19.03.1967 As speaker of the Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Konstantinov 17.3.2014 Konstantinov played a relevant role in the decisions taken by the Verkhovna Rada concerning the “referendum” against territorial integrity of Ukraine and called on voters to cast votes in favour of Crimean Independence. 3. Rustam Ilmirovich d.o.b. 15.08.1976 As Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers of Crimea, Temirgaliev played a relevant role 17.3.2014 Temirgaliev in the decisions taken by the Verkhovna Rada concerning the “referendum” against territorial integrity of Ukraine. He lobbied actively for integration of Crimea into the Russian Federation. 4. Deniz Valentinovich d.o.b. 15.07.1974 Berezovskiy was appointed commander of the Ukrainian Navy on 1 March 2014 and swore an 17.3.2014 Berezovskiy oath to the Crimean armed force, thereby breaking his oath. The Prosecutor-General’s Office of Ukraine launched an investigation against him for high treason.
    [Show full text]
  • Euromaidan Revolution, Crimea and Russia–Ukraine War: Why It Is Time for a Review of Ukrainian–Russian Studies
    Eurasian Geography and Economics ISSN: 1538-7216 (Print) 1938-2863 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rege20 Euromaidan revolution, Crimea and Russia–Ukraine war: why it is time for a review of Ukrainian–Russian studies Taras Kuzio To cite this article: Taras Kuzio (2018) Euromaidan revolution, Crimea and Russia–Ukraine war: why it is time for a review of Ukrainian–Russian studies, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 59:3-4, 529-553, DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2019.1571428 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2019.1571428 Published online: 18 Feb 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 64 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rege20 EURASIAN GEOGRAPHY AND ECONOMICS 2018, VOL. 59, NOS. 3–4, 529–553 https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2019.1571428 Euromaidan revolution, Crimea and Russia–Ukraine war: why it is time for a review of Ukrainian–Russian studies Taras Kuzio Department of Political Science, National University of Kyiv Mohyla Academy, Foreign Policy Institute, School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY This review article seeks to launch a debate on the state of Received 11 September 2018 Ukrainian–Russian studies which have become quite active Accepted 14 January 2019 among Western scholars since the 2014 crisis unfolded. KEYWORDS Through discussion around two recently published books Russia; Ukraine; Crimea; by Richard Sakwa and Anna Matveeva, the review investi- Donbas; war national gates five common themes found in Western scholarship identity about the crisis and Russia–Ukraine war.
    [Show full text]