DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Northern Lights Power League!

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Thanks for playing! Northern Lights would like to thank all teams for participating in the 2014 Northern Lights Power League! We hope you will join us next season for a bigger and better Northern Lights Power League! 18 & Under Division Final Finish Team Name 1 Mizuno Northern Lights 181 2 Mizuno Northern Lights 161 3 Mizuno Northern Lights 182 4 Mizuno Northern Lights 171 5 Mizuno Northern Lights 151 6 Mizuno Northern Lights 18B 7 Mizuno Northern Lights 18R 8 Mizuno Northern Lights 172 9 Mizuno Northern Lights 162 10 Vital 18-1 Elite 11 Mizuno Northern Lights 17B 12 Mizuno Northern Lights 15B 13 Vital 17-1 Elite 14 Mizuno Northern Lights 152 15 Team Edge 17-1 16 Mizuno Northern Lights 16B 17 Mizuno Northern Lights 17R 18 Shakopee 17-1 19 Vital 17-2 Elite 20 TCU Titans 18U 21 Team Edge Orange 17-1 22 Mizuno Northern Lights 17W 23 Croix Attack 17-1 24 Giants 17-1 25 Thunder 17-1 26 Waconia 17-1 27 White Bear Lake 17 Black 16 & Under Division Final Finish Team Name 1 Mizuno Northern Lights 15B 2 Mizuno Northern Lights 16R 3 Mizuno Northern Lights 141 4 Mizuno Northern Lights 15R 5 Vital 16-1 Elite 6 Mizuno Northern Lights 131 7 Vital 16-2 Elite 8 Mizuno Northern Lights 15W 9 Mizuno Northern Lights 16W 10 Vital 15-1 Elite 11 Mizuno Northern Lights 142 12 Team Edge 16-1 13 Thunder 16-1 14 Mizuno Northern Lights 15Z 15 Club EP 16U Black 16 Southern Extreme 16 Black 17 RAGE Volleyball 161 18 Vital 15-2 Elite 19 Team Edge 15-1 20 Lakeville South 16-1 21 EastRidge 16-1 22 Centennial 15-1 23 Croix Attack 16-1 24 Centennial 16-1 25 Waconia 15-1 26 Shakopee 16-1 27 Croix Attack 15-1 28 New Prague 16-1 29 Irish Elite 15U-1 30 Thunder 15-1 31 EastRidge 15-1 32 Club EP 14U Black 33 Centennial 15-2 34 SAJO 16 35 RAGE Volleyball 151 36 Shakopee 16-2 37 Lakeville South 15-1 38 White Bear Lake 16 Black 39 SAJO 15-1 40 EastRidge 16-2 41 Waconia 14-1 42 TCU Titans 16U 43 Hastings Heat 16-1 44 White Bear Lake 15 Black 45 New Prague 15-1 46 RAGE Volleyball 162 47 RAGE Volleyball 152 48 Vital 15-3 Elite 49 Team Edge 15-2 50 Shakopee 16-3 51 SAJO 15-2 52 Southern Extreme 16 Green 53 White Bear Lake 15 Orange 54 Cottage Grove 16-2 55 Club 'Sota 16 Club 14 & Under Division Final Finish Team Name 1 Mizuno Northern Lights 14B 2 Mizuno Northern Lights 14W 3 Irish Elite 14U-1 4 Shakopee 14-1 5 Mizuno Northern Lights 14R 6 Team Edge 14-1 7 Vital 14-1 Elite 8 Mizuno Northern Lights 121 9 Prescott Power 14-1 10 Mizuno Northern Lights 132 11 Team Edge 13-1 12 Apple Valley 14-1 13 Prior Lake Extreme 14-1 14 Croix Attack 14-1 15 Club EP 14U Red 16 Shakopee 14-2 17 SAJO 14-1 18 Mizuno Northern Lights 13B 19 Vital 13-1 Elite 20 Lakeville North 14-1 21 Eagan 13-1 22 EastRidge 14-1 23 SAJO 13-1 24 Lakeville South 14-1 25 Lakeville South 13-1 26 Centennial 13-1 27 Irish Elite 13U-1 28 EastRidge 13-1 29 Western Warriors 13-1 30 White Bear Lake 14 Black 31 Croix Attack 13-1 32 RAGE Volleyball 141 33 Western Warriors 14-1 34 Waconia 14-2 35 Minneapolis VIBE 14-1 36 Shakopee 14-3 37 RAGE Volleyball 131 38 Club EP 14U White 39 New Prague 13 Red 40 Lakeville North 14-2 41 Vital 14-2 Elite 42 Apple Valley 14-2 43 Owatonna Spikers 13-1 44 New Prague 14-1 45 Hastings Heat 14-1 46 TCU Titans 14U Black 47 Thunder 13-1 48 Northfield 14-1 49 Irish Elite 14U-2 50 Prior Lake Extreme 13-1 51 Western Warriors 13-2 52 Owatonna Spikers 14-2 53 Team Edge 13-2 54 Minneapolis VIBE 13-2 55 TCU Titans 14U Blue 56 Waconia 13-1 57 RAGE Volleyball 142 58 Minneapolis VIBE 14-2 59 Minneapolis VIBE 13-1 60 City of Lakes 14 Blue 61 Shakopee 14-4 62 Croix Attack 14-2 63 Club 'Sota 14 Club 64 Irish Elite 13U-2 65 Club 'Sota 13 Club (1) 66 Hastings Heat 13-1 67 City of Lakes 14 Green 68 SAJO 13-2 69 Cottage Grove 13-1 70 EastRidge 13-3 71 Cottage Grove 14-1 72 EastRidge 13-2 73 White Bear Lake 13 Black 74 Croix Attack 13-2 75 New Prague 13 Black 76 RAGE Volleyball 132 12 & Under Division Final Finish Team Name 1 Irish Elite 12U-1 2 Mizuno Northern Lights 122 3 Club EP 12U Black 4 Mizuno Northern Lights 12B 5 Mizuno Northern Lights 111 6 Shakopee 12-1 7 Lakeville North 12-Blk 8 Western Warriors 12-1 9 Lakeville South 12-1 10 Apple Valley 12-1 11 Centennial 12-1 12 Lakeville North 12-Red 13 SAJO 12-Shanks 14 Owatonna Spikers 12-1 15 Lakeville South 12-2 16 Mizuno Northern Lights 112 17 Northfield 12-1 18 EastRidge 12-1 19 New Prague 12 Red 20 Spartan Wave 12-1 21 Thunder 12-1 22 Shakopee 12-2 23 Club 'Sota 12 Club 24 Vital 12-1 Elite 25 SAJO 12-Massey 26 Western Warriors 11-1 27 Club EP 12U Red 28 Lakeville South 11-1 29 Centennial 11-1 30 Club EP 12U White 31 Farmington 12-1 32 Prior Lake Extreme 12-1 33 RAGE Volleyball 121 34 Minneapolis VIBE 12-1 35 TCU Titans 12U Black 36 Owatonna Spikers 12-2 37 Lakeville North 11-1 38 Cottage Grove 12-1 39 White Bear Lake 12 Black 40 Irish Elite 12U-2 41 Shakopee 12-4 42 Western Warriors 12-2 43 EastRidge 11-1 44 Owatonna Spikers 12-3 45 TCU Titans 12u Blue 46 Shakopee 12-3 47 Lakeville South 11-2 48 Farmington 12-2 49 Hastings Heat 12-1 50 Northfield 11-1 51 New Prague 12 Black 52 Chaska Juniors 12 Black.
Recommended publications
  • Prague Participatory Budget

    Prague Participatory Budget

    PRAGUE PARTICIPATORY BUDGET CASE STUDY REPORT & ANALYSIS Prepared by AGORA CE Author: Vojtěch Černý The publication is a result of the project ”Participatory Budgeting for Sustainable Development of V4 Capital Cities” supported by International Visegrad Fund. Project coordinator: Collegium Civitas, Warsaw, Poland Partners of the project: Mindspace - Budapest, Agora CE - Prague, Utopia - Bratislava, Inicjatywy - Warsaw 2 This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license 3 This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the IVF cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. CONTENTS Preface ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Prague – main facts about the city .......................................................................................................... 6 Origins of PB in Prague ............................................................................................................................ 8 Development of the Participative Budget(s) in Prague ......................................................................... 15 Preparation of the PB procedure ...................................................................................................... 16 Participatory budgeting ..................................................................................................................... 19
  • 66-Conference Track Meet-Stroud 4-7-15 Girls

    66-Conference Track Meet-Stroud 4-7-15 Girls

    66-CONFERENCE TRACK MEET-STROUD 4-7-15 GIRLS DIVISION 100 – 1. Milligan-Chandler-12.56, 2.Anderson-Stroud-12.81, 3.Gibson-Okemah-13.01, 4.Cooper-Prague- 13.16, 5.Flannen-Okemah-14.04, 6.Burke-P.T.14.13 200-1.Anderson-Stroud-28.41, 2.McDaniel-P.T.-28.42, 3.Rose-Seminole-29.08, 4.Turner-Okemah-29.59, 5.James-Seminole-30.16, 6.Frazier-Okemah-30.41 400-1.Cooper-Prague-1:02.86, 2.Anderson-Stroud-1:03.41, 3.Schultz-Prague-1:06.16, 4.Coon-Okemah- 1:06.87, 5. Haberman-Okemah-1:07.13, 6.Davidson-Seminole-1:10.13 800-1.Windsler-P.T.2:28.90, 2.Opela-Prague-2:29.01, 3.Wood-Holdenville-2:35.53, 4.Hilburn-Meeker- 2:42.58, 5.Vanschuyver-Meeker-2:46.01, 6.Dunn-Prague-2:51.02 1600-1.Windsler P.T.6:08, 2.Hilburn-Meeker-6:12, 3.Vanschuyver-Meeker-6:22, 4.Crecraft-P.T.6:27, 5.Campbell-Okemah-6:32, 6.Dunn-Prague-6:50 3200-1.Campbell-Okemah-13:28, 2.Hilbun-Prague-14:21, 3.Brunson-Prague-14:21, 4.Henley-Meeker- 15:23, 5. Colbert-Okemah-16:32 100m Hurdles-1.Stack-Prague-17.84, 2.Vanlandingham-Seminole-18.63, 3.Briggs-Prague-18.71, 4.Cowan-P.T.-18.79, 5.Bunyard-Stroud-18.94, 6.Hilbun-Prague-19.27 300m Hurdles-1.Wood-Holdenville-51.79, 2.Stack-Prague-53.08, 3.Briggs-Prague-54.75, 4.Bunyard- Stroud-54.99,5.Hilbun-Prague-55.47, Taylor-Okemah-57.26 4x100 Relay-1.Okemah-53.31, 2.Seminole-55.13, 3.Prague, 4.P.T.-55.84 4x200 Relay-1.Okemah-1:56.55, 2.Prague-1:58.91, 3.Seminole-1:59.40, 4.P.T.-2:01.78 4x400 Relay- 1.Prague-4:23, 2.P.T.-4:31, 3.Okemah-4:33, 4.Seminole-4:53, 5.Meeker-4:59 4x800 Relay-1.Prague-10:49, 2.P.T.-11:00, 3.Meeker-11:21, 4.Okemah-11:41 SHOT-1.Knighton-Seminole-44-10,
  • Research Centres of Charles University

    Research Centres of Charles University

    Charles University Introduction When the Bohemian King and Holy Roman Emperor Charles IV established a university in the capital city of his kingdom in 1348, which was the first university north of the Alps and east of the French borders, it was his greatest wish that as soon as possible, it would reach the quality of the universities as in Bologna, Oxford, and Paris, which were the best establishments offering a higher education in Europe at that time. It is our great obligation and task to fulfil this historic legacy, to assure the highest quality and integrity of university education, and to contribute to the cultivation and development of learning and culture in the Czech Republic, in Europe, and in the world in general. Charles University is a leading world-class university. Its top priority is therefore not only a constant emphasis on improving the quality of scientific and pedagogic activities, but also on the thorough fulfilment of its “third role”. This is why Charles University is a key subject participating in the formation of the Czech public’s positive view of national cultural values of learning and of critical and creative thinking. Quod bonum felix faustum fortunatumque sit. May the outcome be good, auspicious, fortunate, and successful. Tomáš Zima Rector of Charles University Management of Rector prof. MUDr. Tomáš Zima, DrSc. Vice-Rector for Academic Appointments Vice-Rector for Research prof. JUDr. Aleš Gerloch, CSc. doc. RNDr. Jan Konvalinka, CSc. Vice-Rector for Development prof. RNDr. Jan Hála, DrSc. Vice-Rector for Public Affairs Vice-Rector for European Affairs prof.
  • Vyhodnocení Urbanistických Hodnot Jihozápadní Části Prahy (MO Praha 5)

    Vyhodnocení Urbanistických Hodnot Jihozápadní Části Prahy (MO Praha 5)

    Vysoká škola regionálního rozvoje a Bankovní institut – AMBIS Management rozvoje měst a regionů Vyhodnocení urbanistických hodnot jihozápadní části Prahy (MO Praha 5) Diplomová práce Autor: Bc. David Poduška Management rozvoje měst a regionů Vedoucí práce: prof. Ing. arch. ThLic. Jiří Kupka, Ph.D. Praha Rok 2020 Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci zpracoval samostatně a v seznamu uvedl veškerou použitou literaturu. Svým podpisem stvrzuji, že odevzdaná elektronická podoba práce je identická s její tištěnou verzí, a jsem seznámen se skutečností, že se práce bude archivovat v knihovně VŠ AMBIS a dále bude zpřístupněna třetím osobám prostřednictvím interní databáze elektronických vysokoškolských prací. V Praze dne 26.04.2020 Poděkování Tímto bych chtěl poděkovat především vedoucímu mé diplomové práce, prof. Ing. arch. ThLic. Jiřímu Kupkovi Ph.D., za odborné vedení diplomové práce, cenné rady a čas, který mi věnoval v průběhu příprav a zpracování diplomové práce. Anotace Diplomová práce se zabývá zmapováním a vyhodnocením urbanistických hodnot historických jader obcí (původní venkovská sídla) v jihozápadní části Prahy, spadajících pod městskou část Praha 5, Praha-Slivenec, Praha 13, Praha-Řeporyje, Praha 16, Praha-Lipence, Praha-Lochkov, Praha-Velká Chuchle, Praha-Zbraslav, Praha-Zličín, která se v průběhu 20. století postupně připojovala k Praze. Vybrané území Prahy bylo osidlováno od doby kamenné přes období středověku, novověku, 19. století, začátku 20. století až po současnost. Každé z těchto období mělo na vybranou lokalitu určitý vliv, kdy dosahovalo takového rozsahu, že urbanistické hodnoty v těchto lokalitách byly dochovány dodnes. Hlavními zdroji k zmapování a vyhodnocení urbanistických hodnot dané části Prahy je literatura o Praze společně s literaturou zaměřující se na dané lokality, mapové podklady, vlastní terénní průzkum a územně analytické podklady hl.

  • Prague's Public Space and Franz Kafka's Readings of Prague

    MAREK NEKULA The Divided City: Prague’s Public Space and Franz Kafka’s Readings of Prague It is no surprise that the monuments on Prague’s squares, riverbanks, and hills reflect the national ideologies from which they emanated. In the nineteenth century, when the first memorial monuments were founded, middle-class civic society used them to present and pass on its values to viewers in public space, viewers who themselves may have been nationally indifferent. In nineteenth-century Prague, these values were above all national in character: for the Czech and German mid- dle classes, language-based nationalism dominated all other values; it determined the political programs of most Czech and German political parties, as well as more private choices, such as where parents sent their children to schools. Czech middle-class nationalists demanded that the Czech language and Czech people be given equal standing with the Germans, while German middle-class nationalists wanted to maintain the status quo. Both groups were becoming more and more interested in creating linguistically distinct spaces that would be dominated by the language and symbols of Czech and German nationalism. In Prague, public space became the staging ground for national discourse, where adherents of monolingual national ideologies competed with one another and attempted to control public opinion in various ways, including the domina- tion of public space. One of the ways to control and speak to the public was to properly stage ceremonial acts, for example the funerals of Václav Hanka, Karel Havlíček Borovský and Božena Němcová or the laying of the first stone of the Czech National Theater.
  • General Presentation 09/2012

    General Presentation 09/2012

    GENERAL PRESENTATION 09/2012 GENERAL PRESENTATION Company: M.O.Z. Consult s.r.o. Address: Washintonova 1599/17 110 00 Prague 1 Czech Republic Activity : Parking consultancy M.O.Z. Consult s.r.o., Washingtonova 1599/17 110 00 Prague 1, tel: 221 666 644, fax: 221 666 640, e-mail: [email protected], www.moz-c.cz GENERAL PRESENTATION 09/2012 ABOUT US From its start in 1992, the company M.O.Z. Consult s.r.o. specialises in complex solutions of parking and traffic schemes for private and public clients. Using long-term experience and expertise we do the best not only to identify the client´s problem but to understand the needs and interests and to propose solutions fitting the space, time, possibilities and sources of the client. The quality of our work has been appreciated by many clients from local government, municipalities and business sector, having built a long-term cooperation with many of them. Numerous analysis and projects worked out during 20 year history comprise : more than 150 000 on-street parking spaces more than 15 000 parking spaces in car parks more than 5 million parking vehicles counted projects for more than 50 clients COMPANY ORIENTATION Working as a specialist in parking, our work is based on wide and complex analysis of the object, cooperation and discussion with the client, resulting in parking strategy recommendations, short and long term solutions, implementation and operation scheme proposals, future development opportunities. Scope of work : Parking strategy plans Analysis of traffic and parking in city centres Analysis of traffic and parking in residential housing estates Location studies for parking facilities Marketing studies for parking facilities Analysis of parking zones operation Economic and legal advisory Optimisation and design of parking equipments Optimisation and designs of static and dynamic guiding systems M.O.Z.

  • Wine in Prague Contents

    Wine in Prague Contents Prague as a city for wine lovers? Five reasons why wine is on the up-and-up in Prague . 2 The history of wine in Prague, from Charles IV onward . 4 Czech wines and getting to know them . 8 Varieties of white and red wines . 9 Wine categories . 11 How to buy Czech wine . 13 A guide to reading wine labels . 14 Where to go for wine in Prague . 15 The quest for wine among Prague’s vineyards . 16 Time for a glass: Where to enjoy some wine . 19 For lunch or dinner: Where wine and food go well together . 30 Fine dining: Restaurants with wine lists of distinction . 44 Wine to go: Where to shop . 53 The year in wine: Wine events in Prague . 56 Map with directory . 61 Pictograms Czech wines Imported wines A vineyard in the Small Fürstenberg Garden Prague as a city for wine 3. Dining both fine and casual In food and wine, Prague offers tremendous value for money . lovers? Five reasons why It is evident from every à la carte menu, wine-list and pricing of wine by the glass . Long gone is the notion that fine fare and wine are wine is on the up-and-up to be found only in a select few establishments . The contemporary in Prague wine-bars of Prague have a relaxed atmosphere and price-wise belong to the sensible mid-range . On the other hand, if you are New trends, wine-growing traditions and advantageous geography looking for a top dining experience, there are a number of places make Prague one of the top cities for wine lovers right now .
  • Environmental & Socio-Economic Studies

    Environmental & Socio-Economic Studies

    Environmental & Socio-economic Studies DOI: 10.2478/environ-2019-0014 Environ. Socio.-econ. Stud., 2019, 7, 3: 14-23 © 2019 Copyright by University of Silesia in Katowice ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Original article Young urban trees as important structures in the cultural heritage of cities – a case study from Prague Ales Rudl1, Ivo Machar*2, Lubos Uradnicek3, Ludek Praus4, Vilem Pechanec5 1National Heritage Institute, Valdštejnské náměstí 162/3, 118 01 Praha 1, Czech Republic; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000- 0003-0511-2338 2Department of Development and Environmental Studies , Faculty of Science, Palacky University, Str. 17 listopadu 12, 771 47 Olomouc, Czech Republic; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1885-7032 3Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, Brno, Czech Republic; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2491-1322 4Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, Brno, Czech Republic; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9541-7532 5Department of Geoinformatics Palacky, Faculty of Science University, Faculty of Science, Str. 17 listopadu 12, 771 47 Olomouc, Czech Republic; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6728-6646 E–mail address (*corresponding author): [email protected] _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Urban trees generate numerous ecosystem services, and these are often closely associated with the species, age and size of trees as well as with their vitality. Generally, the focus of urban and regional planning is aimed at very large trees, because very large trees are considered to be key green structures in an urban green infrastructure.
  • 141–272 City Management and Administration the First Second

    141–272 City Management and Administration the First Second

    City Management and Administration The First Second Third Book 141–272 City Management and Administration Tomáš Hudeček The Second Book Good City Administration in the Conditions of the Czech Republic © text Tomáš Hudeček © 2020 Prague Institute of Planning and Development Graphic Design © Martin Odehnal ISBN 978-80-88377-17-7 Contents The Second Book Good City Administration in the Conditions of the Czech Republic Introduction 147 IV. Decision-Making and City Administration 149 10. Decision-making and decision 151 11. Primary and secondary decisions of the city 165 12. Basic areas, limits and role of city administration 177 V. Good Governance of Big Cities 191 13. Basic differences in the governance 193 of small and large cities 14. The stratification of the self-government 207 of a big city 15. Complexity of big city administration 217 VI. Planning 231 16. Planning and strategy 233 17. City development strategies 245 18. Development of the city’s territory 259 Introduction In the second book, we will look at cities, their functioning and behavior from a completely opposite perspective than in the first book. Using knowledge of general development and knowing the basic triad of concentration characterized by the triadic measure of chaos, order, and choice (chaos—order— choice), we will try to unify the dualities of (1) system – deci- sion, (2) city – human, and (3) order – chaos. In the first part of this book, we will therefore focus in detail on the essence of decisions and the process by which deci- sions are made: also known as decision-making. Using several analogies between human decision-making and processes tak- ing place in the highest management layers of the city, we will try to illustrate the essence of making every single decision.
  • Thanks for Playing! Northern Lights Would Like to Thank All Teams for Participating in the 2015 Northern Lights Power League!

    Thanks for Playing! Northern Lights Would Like to Thank All Teams for Participating in the 2015 Northern Lights Power League!

    Thanks for playing! Northern Lights would like to thank all teams for participating in the 2015 Northern Lights Power League! 18 & Under Division Final Finish Team Name 1 Mizuno Northern Lights 182 2 Mizuno Northern Lights 171 3 Mizuno Northern Lights 181 4 Mizuno Northern Lights 161 5 Mizuno Northern Lights 172 6 Mizuno Northern Lights 17B 7 Mizuno Northern Lights 162 8 Mizuno Northern Lights 151 9 Hutchinson JO Volleyball 171 10 VVC 18-1 Nike 11 Mizuno Northern Lights 18R 12 Mizuno Northern Lights 18B 13 VVC 17-1 Nike 14 Mizuno Northern Lights 16B 15 Freeze 17-1 16 VVC 17-2 Swoosh 17 Mizuno Northern Lights 17R 18 Southern Extreme 17-Black 19 Freeze 16-1 20 Southern Extreme 17-Green 21 Eden Prairie 18 Black 22 Shakopee 17-1 23 SAJO 17-1 24 Waconia 17-1 25 SAJO 17-2 16 & Under Division Final Finish Team Name 1 Mizuno Northern Lights 141 2 Mizuno Northern Lights 152 3 Mizuno Northern Lights 16R 4 Mizuno Northern Lights 16Z 5 Farmington 16-1 6 Mizuno Northern Lights 16W 7 Mizuno Northern Lights 142 8 VVC 16-1 Nike 9 VVC 15-1 Nike 10 Mizuno Northern Lights 15B 11 Mizuno Northern Lights 15R 12 Eden Prairie 15 Black 13 VVC 16-2 Swoosh 14 Mizuno Northern Lights 131 15 Freeze 15-1 16 Mizuno Northern Lights 15W 17 Shakopee 16-1 18 Freeze 16-2 19 Eden Prairie 16 Black 20 VVC 16-3 Elite 21 VVC 14-1 Nike 22 VVC 15-2 Swoosh 23 Shakopee 16-2 24 Croix Attack 16-1 25 Hastings Heat 16-1 26 New Prague 15-1 27 Freeze 15-2 28 Farmington 16-2 29 PEM KaBoom 16-1 30 Waconia 14-1 31 Southern Extreme 16-1 32 New Prague 16-1 33 Croix Attack 15-1 34 SAJO 15 35
  • Přehled Českého Nemovitostního Trhu Czech Real Estate Market Survey

    Přehled Českého Nemovitostního Trhu Czech Real Estate Market Survey

    PŘEHLED ČESKÉHO NEMOVITOSTNÍHO TRHU CZECH REAL ESTATE MARKET SURVEY PENTA titulka Trend Report FINAL.indd 1 23.02.17 13:54 Generální partner ARTN AREMD General Partner Partneři ARTN AREMD Partners The content of Trend Report 2017 is based on the expert discussion of AREMD members, their own analysis and prognosis of future developments, and should be considered a discussion material. We welcome your comments and reactions at [email protected]. Association for Real Estate Market Development thanks to all experts who contributed to the production of the publication: Diblík Ondřej, Lexxus Drtina Tomáš, GfK Czech Frait Jan, Česká národní banka Fröhlichová Tereza, ACHOUR & PARTNERS advokátní kancelář Hejlová Hana, Česká národní banka Hlaváček Michal, Česká národní banka Holub Emil, Clifford Chance Chaloupka Radek, KPMG Kaděrová Martina, AREMD Klapalová Zdenka, Knight Frank Klas Přemysl, KPMG Česká republika Klečka Karel, Patria investiční společnost Kosman Kamil, KAAP Media Kostrounová Lenka, ČSOB Kozáková Daniela, Havel, Holásek & Partners Mládek Martin, Invicta Law, advokátní kancelář Mocková Marie, Hypoteční banka Novák Pavel, Knight Frank Nováková Hana, Invicta Law, advokátní kancelář Pažitka David, Klépierre Pácal Jiří, Central Europe Holding Polák Radek, Trigema Sadil Jan, Hypoteční Banka Soural Marcel, Trigema Svoboda Prokop, Svoboda &Williams Šindelářová Lenka, BNP Paribas Real Estate Czech Republic Špaček Ondřej, KPMG Česká republika Štys Daniel, CBRE Toman Petr, KPMG Česká republika Vlk Ondřej, Colliers Association for Real Estate Market
  • EIA in Prague, Tables Informace Z Ročenky Praha ŽP 2004, Tabulky

    EIA in Prague, Tables Informace Z Ročenky Praha ŽP 2004, Tabulky

    EIA in Prague, tables informace z ročenky Praha ŽP 2004, tabulky Tab. - Overview of the number of notices at the level of MHMP pursuant to the Act No. 244/1992 Code within the period from 1. 9. 2003 to 31. 8. 2004) EIA activity Date of notification Date of public hearing, Issuing phase of the EIA process of Statement Second intensification of the Central 21. 12. 2001 Notification without documentation Waste Water delivered Treatment Plant Prague, Troja Island, Prague 6 Source: OŽP MHMP Tab. - Overview of EIA activities pursuant to the Act No. 244/1992 Code processed by the MŽP ČR, state from 1. 9. 2003 to 31. 8. 2004 EIA activity Date of notification Date of public hearing, Issuing phase of the EIA process of Statement Prague ring road, construction 520, 28. 2. 2001 Additional information Březiněves - Satalice Exit 4D1 and transport connection of 18. 7. 2001 Cancelled on the West 15. 1. 2004 Commercial Zone Průhonice Fast-train railway Prague–Ruzyně 21. 12. 2001 Public hearing on 25. 4. 2003, Airport–Kladno, documentation returned to add I phase other alternative route Source: OŽP MHMP Tab. - Overview of EIA activities under the responsibility of the OŽP MHMP pursuant to the Act No. 100/2001 Code, status from 1. 9. 2003 to 31. 8. 2004 (Order number means the order of the EIA process in the EIA Information System since the Act No. 100/2001 Code has become effective, i.e. since 1. 1. 2002.) No. Name of activity Date of the EIA Conclusion of the Phase of the EIA project notification preliminary procedure 003 Printing house 15.