DOCSLIB.ORG

66-Conference Track Meet-Stroud 4-7-15 Girls

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
66-Conference Track Meet-Stroud 4-7-15 Girls 66-CONFERENCE TRACK MEET-STROUD 4-7-15 GIRLS DIVISION 100 – 1. Milligan-Chandler-12.56, 2.Anderson-Stroud-12.81, 3.Gibson-Okemah-13.01, 4.Cooper-Prague- 13.16, 5.Flannen-Okemah-14.04, 6.Burke-P.T.14.13 200-1.Anderson-Stroud-28.41, 2.McDaniel-P.T.-28.42, 3.Rose-Seminole-29.08, 4.Turner-Okemah-29.59, 5.James-Seminole-30.16, 6.Frazier-Okemah-30.41 400-1.Cooper-Prague-1:02.86, 2.Anderson-Stroud-1:03.41, 3.Schultz-Prague-1:06.16, 4.Coon-Okemah- 1:06.87, 5. Haberman-Okemah-1:07.13, 6.Davidson-Seminole-1:10.13 800-1.Windsler-P.T.2:28.90, 2.Opela-Prague-2:29.01, 3.Wood-Holdenville-2:35.53, 4.Hilburn-Meeker- 2:42.58, 5.Vanschuyver-Meeker-2:46.01, 6.Dunn-Prague-2:51.02 1600-1.Windsler P.T.6:08, 2.Hilburn-Meeker-6:12, 3.Vanschuyver-Meeker-6:22, 4.Crecraft-P.T.6:27, 5.Campbell-Okemah-6:32, 6.Dunn-Prague-6:50 3200-1.Campbell-Okemah-13:28, 2.Hilbun-Prague-14:21, 3.Brunson-Prague-14:21, 4.Henley-Meeker- 15:23, 5. Colbert-Okemah-16:32 100m Hurdles-1.Stack-Prague-17.84, 2.Vanlandingham-Seminole-18.63, 3.Briggs-Prague-18.71, 4.Cowan-P.T.-18.79, 5.Bunyard-Stroud-18.94, 6.Hilbun-Prague-19.27 300m Hurdles-1.Wood-Holdenville-51.79, 2.Stack-Prague-53.08, 3.Briggs-Prague-54.75, 4.Bunyard- Stroud-54.99,5.Hilbun-Prague-55.47, Taylor-Okemah-57.26 4x100 Relay-1.Okemah-53.31, 2.Seminole-55.13, 3.Prague, 4.P.T.-55.84 4x200 Relay-1.Okemah-1:56.55, 2.Prague-1:58.91, 3.Seminole-1:59.40, 4.P.T.-2:01.78 4x400 Relay- 1.Prague-4:23, 2.P.T.-4:31, 3.Okemah-4:33, 4.Seminole-4:53, 5.Meeker-4:59 4x800 Relay-1.Prague-10:49, 2.P.T.-11:00, 3.Meeker-11:21, 4.Okemah-11:41 SHOT-1.Knighton-Seminole-44-10, 2.Fisher-Stroud-39-2, 3.Milligan-Chandler-31-5, 4.Stevenson-P.T.-30- 10, 5.Wynn-P.T.-30-8, 6.Landers-Okemah-29-1 DISCUS-1.Fisher-Stroud-112-1, 2.Stevenson-P.T.85-5, 3.Wynn-P.T.-79-6, 4.Ward-Chandler-72-3, 5.Sasser- P.T.-56-3, 6.Mcginnis-Prague-50-8 LJ-1.Milligan-Chandler-16-3.5, 2.Pewitt-Prague-14-5, 3.Hodgins-Seminole-14-4.5, 4.Schultz-Prague-13- 7.5, 5.Bishop-Prague-13-7, Perry-Holdenville-13-3 HJ-1.Schultz-Prague-5-0, 2.Hodgins-Seminole-4-10, 3.Hammond-Seminole-4-10, 4.Milligan-Chandler-4-8, 5.Bryant-Seminole-4-4, 6.Johnson-Seminole-4-4 PV-1.Gibson-Okemah-10-3, 2.Sosbee-Seminole-8-0, 3.Tinsley-Seminole-7-0, 4.McAlvain-Seminole-6-6 BOYS DIVISION 400 METER RELAY 1ST SEMINOLE 44.76 2ND OKEMAH 44.77 3RD PERKINS-TRYON 46.34 4TH HOLDENVILLE 47.44 5TH PRAGUE 47.83 3200 RELAY 1ST PRAGUE 9:26.88 2ND OKEMAH 9:27.26 3RD SEMINOLE 9:55.41 4TH PERKINS-TRYON 10:19.25 5TH HOLDENVILLE 10:41.9 110 METER HURDLES 1ST WILLIAMS-HOLDENVILLE 15.58 2ND PIEHLER-STROUD 16.02 3RD CLEVELAND-PRAGUE 17.37 4TH SMITH-STROUD 17.47 5TH WINCHESTER-PRAGUE 17.96 6TH SMITH-PERKINS-TRYON 21.08 3200 METER RUN 1ST BASKINS-SEMINOLE 12:13.69 2ND HICKERSON-PRAGUE 12:21.02 3RD LANDERS-OKEMAH 14:01.97 4TH DECKER-CHANDLER 14:03.27 5TH PETERS-HOLDENVILLE 15:29.97 6TH FULLBRIGHT-OKEMAH 15:30.09 800 METER RELAY 1ST OKEMAH 1:34.89 2ND SEMINOLE 1:38.26 3RD PERKINS-TRYON 1:40.99 4TH MEEKER 1:46.08 800 METER RUN 1ST WILLIAMS-MEEKER 2:15.49 2ND ALBERT-OKEMAH 2:20.00 3RD CHANDLER-SEMINOLE 2:22.94 4TH COOK-OKEMAH 2:23.60 5TH TURNER-PRAGUE 2:28.71 6TH WYATT-PRAGUE 2:30.00 100 METER RUN 1ST DAILY-OKEMAH 10.86 2ND WHISNAT-OKEMAH 11.07 3RD REESE-SEMINOLE 11.14 4TH MEYERS-CHANDLER 11.32 5TH PEYTON-PERKINS-TRYON 11.53 6TH BILLINGS-OKEMAH 11.65 400 METER RUN 1ST BIARD-PRAGUE 52.70 2ND ROBERTS-MEEKER 55.96 3RD WEBB-OKEMAH 57.22 4TH LOVINGS-CHANDLER 57.66 5TH ELMORE-CHANDLER 57.84 6TH WYATT-PRAGUE 59.50 300 METER HURDLES 1ST WINCHESTER-PRAGUE 44.81 2ND PIEHLER-STROUD 45.16 3RD CAMPBELL-OKEMAH 45.88 4TH CLEVELAND-PRAGUE 46.02 5TH SMITH-STROUD 55.12 200 METER RUN 1ST DAILY-OKEMAH 23.00 2ND MEYERS-CHANDLER 23.71 3RD WILLIAMS-HOLDENVILLE 24.21 4TH BILLINGS-OKEMAH 24.52 5TH KIKER-SEMINOLE 25.04 6TH JENNINGS-MEEKER 25.62 1600 METER RUN 1ST HICKERSON-PRAGUE 5:20.32 2ND CHANDLER-SEMINOLE 5:27.00 3RD WILLIAMS-MEEKER 5:29.19 4TH BASKINS-SEMINOLE 5:50.43 5TH ELMORE-CHANDLER 5:57.77 6TH INGRAM-HOLDENVILLE 6:14.44 1600 METER RELAY 1ST PRAGUE 3:46.19 2ND OKEMAH 3:50.94 3RD SEMINOLE 3:55.22 4TH MEEKER 4:00.23 5TH PERKINS-TRYON 4:07.55 SHOT PUTT 1ST BUCKTROT-STROUD 47-05 2ND BOODT-STROUD 46-10.5 3RD BTRITT-OKEMAH 45-6 4TH PHELPS-PERKIS-TRYON 44-10 5TH BILLIE-SEMINOLE 42-7 6TH CLOSE-STROUD 41-8.5 DISCUS 1ST BOODT-STROUD 144-3 2ND BUCKTROT-STROUD 138-6 3RD PEYTON-PERKINS-TRYON 126-9 4TH CLOSE-STROUD 123-2 5TH HART-PERKINS-TRYON 115-6 6TH HILL-OKEMAH 100-8 POLE VAULT 1ST TANNER-PRAGUE 12-0 2ND JOHNSON-STROUD 11-6 3RD BRASWELL-CHANDLER 11-0 4TH STAFFORD-HOLDENVILLE 10-6 5TH FISHER-SEMINOLE 9-6 6TH CHISHOLM-PRAGUE 9-6 LONG JUMP 1ST WILLIAMS-HOLDENVILLE 20-3 2ND ZENON-PRAGUE 18-7 3RD FISHER-SEMINIOLE 18-4 4TH REESE-SEMINOLE 18-3 5TH MEYERS-CHANDLER 17-10 6TH WEIGHT-PERKINS-TRYON 17-6.5 HIGH JUMP 1ST WHISNAT-OKEMAH 6-4 2ND FISHER-SEMINOLE 6-2 3RD WINCHESTER-PRAGUE 5-6 4TH LESTER-PRAGUE 5-4 5TH ELMORE-CHANDLER 5-2 GIRLS SCORING: PRAGUE-170, SEMINOLE-113, PERKINS-TRYON 107, OKEMAH- 105, STROUD 50, MEEKER 40, CHANDLER-34, HOLDENVILLE 17 BOYS SCORING: OKEMAH 147, PRAGUE 139, SEMINOLE 106, STROUD 71, PERKINS-TRYON 52, HOLDENVILLE 43, MEEKER 41, CHANDLER 34 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prague Participatory Budget
    PRAGUE PARTICIPATORY BUDGET CASE STUDY REPORT & ANALYSIS Prepared by AGORA CE Author: Vojtěch Černý The publication is a result of the project ”Participatory Budgeting for Sustainable Development of V4 Capital Cities” supported by International Visegrad Fund. Project coordinator: Collegium Civitas, Warsaw, Poland Partners of the project: Mindspace - Budapest, Agora CE - Prague, Utopia - Bratislava, Inicjatywy - Warsaw 2 This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license 3 This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the IVF cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. CONTENTS Preface ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Prague – main facts about the city .......................................................................................................... 6 Origins of PB in Prague ............................................................................................................................ 8 Development of the Participative Budget(s) in Prague ......................................................................... 15 Preparation of the PB procedure ...................................................................................................... 16 Participatory budgeting ..................................................................................................................... 19
    [Show full text]
  • Prague's Public Space and Franz Kafka's Readings of Prague
    MAREK NEKULA The Divided City: Prague’s Public Space and Franz Kafka’s Readings of Prague It is no surprise that the monuments on Prague’s squares, riverbanks, and hills reflect the national ideologies from which they emanated. In the nineteenth century, when the first memorial monuments were founded, middle-class civic society used them to present and pass on its values to viewers in public space, viewers who themselves may have been nationally indifferent. In nineteenth-century Prague, these values were above all national in character: for the Czech and German mid- dle classes, language-based nationalism dominated all other values; it determined the political programs of most Czech and German political parties, as well as more private choices, such as where parents sent their children to schools. Czech middle-class nationalists demanded that the Czech language and Czech people be given equal standing with the Germans, while German middle-class nationalists wanted to maintain the status quo. Both groups were becoming more and more interested in creating linguistically distinct spaces that would be dominated by the language and symbols of Czech and German nationalism. In Prague, public space became the staging ground for national discourse, where adherents of monolingual national ideologies competed with one another and attempted to control public opinion in various ways, including the domina- tion of public space. One of the ways to control and speak to the public was to properly stage ceremonial acts, for example the funerals of Václav Hanka, Karel Havlíček Borovský and Božena Němcová or the laying of the first stone of the Czech National Theater.
    [Show full text]
  • General Presentation 09/2012
    GENERAL PRESENTATION 09/2012 GENERAL PRESENTATION Company: M.O.Z. Consult s.r.o. Address: Washintonova 1599/17 110 00 Prague 1 Czech Republic Activity : Parking consultancy M.O.Z. Consult s.r.o., Washingtonova 1599/17 110 00 Prague 1, tel: 221 666 644, fax: 221 666 640, e-mail: [email protected], www.moz-c.cz GENERAL PRESENTATION 09/2012 ABOUT US From its start in 1992, the company M.O.Z. Consult s.r.o. specialises in complex solutions of parking and traffic schemes for private and public clients. Using long-term experience and expertise we do the best not only to identify the client´s problem but to understand the needs and interests and to propose solutions fitting the space, time, possibilities and sources of the client. The quality of our work has been appreciated by many clients from local government, municipalities and business sector, having built a long-term cooperation with many of them. Numerous analysis and projects worked out during 20 year history comprise : more than 150 000 on-street parking spaces more than 15 000 parking spaces in car parks more than 5 million parking vehicles counted projects for more than 50 clients COMPANY ORIENTATION Working as a specialist in parking, our work is based on wide and complex analysis of the object, cooperation and discussion with the client, resulting in parking strategy recommendations, short and long term solutions, implementation and operation scheme proposals, future development opportunities. Scope of work : Parking strategy plans Analysis of traffic and parking in city centres Analysis of traffic and parking in residential housing estates Location studies for parking facilities Marketing studies for parking facilities Analysis of parking zones operation Economic and legal advisory Optimisation and design of parking equipments Optimisation and designs of static and dynamic guiding systems M.O.Z.
    [Show full text]
  • 141–272 City Management and Administration the First Second
    City Management and Administration The First Second Third Book 141–272 City Management and Administration Tomáš Hudeček The Second Book Good City Administration in the Conditions of the Czech Republic © text Tomáš Hudeček © 2020 Prague Institute of Planning and Development Graphic Design © Martin Odehnal ISBN 978-80-88377-17-7 Contents The Second Book Good City Administration in the Conditions of the Czech Republic Introduction 147 IV. Decision-Making and City Administration 149 10. Decision-making and decision 151 11. Primary and secondary decisions of the city 165 12. Basic areas, limits and role of city administration 177 V. Good Governance of Big Cities 191 13. Basic differences in the governance 193 of small and large cities 14. The stratification of the self-government 207 of a big city 15. Complexity of big city administration 217 VI. Planning 231 16. Planning and strategy 233 17. City development strategies 245 18. Development of the city’s territory 259 Introduction In the second book, we will look at cities, their functioning and behavior from a completely opposite perspective than in the first book. Using knowledge of general development and knowing the basic triad of concentration characterized by the triadic measure of chaos, order, and choice (chaos—order— choice), we will try to unify the dualities of (1) system – deci- sion, (2) city – human, and (3) order – chaos. In the first part of this book, we will therefore focus in detail on the essence of decisions and the process by which deci- sions are made: also known as decision-making. Using several analogies between human decision-making and processes tak- ing place in the highest management layers of the city, we will try to illustrate the essence of making every single decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Thanks for Playing! Northern Lights Would Like to Thank All Teams for Participating in the 2015 Northern Lights Power League!
    Thanks for playing! Northern Lights would like to thank all teams for participating in the 2015 Northern Lights Power League! 18 & Under Division Final Finish Team Name 1 Mizuno Northern Lights 182 2 Mizuno Northern Lights 171 3 Mizuno Northern Lights 181 4 Mizuno Northern Lights 161 5 Mizuno Northern Lights 172 6 Mizuno Northern Lights 17B 7 Mizuno Northern Lights 162 8 Mizuno Northern Lights 151 9 Hutchinson JO Volleyball 171 10 VVC 18-1 Nike 11 Mizuno Northern Lights 18R 12 Mizuno Northern Lights 18B 13 VVC 17-1 Nike 14 Mizuno Northern Lights 16B 15 Freeze 17-1 16 VVC 17-2 Swoosh 17 Mizuno Northern Lights 17R 18 Southern Extreme 17-Black 19 Freeze 16-1 20 Southern Extreme 17-Green 21 Eden Prairie 18 Black 22 Shakopee 17-1 23 SAJO 17-1 24 Waconia 17-1 25 SAJO 17-2 16 & Under Division Final Finish Team Name 1 Mizuno Northern Lights 141 2 Mizuno Northern Lights 152 3 Mizuno Northern Lights 16R 4 Mizuno Northern Lights 16Z 5 Farmington 16-1 6 Mizuno Northern Lights 16W 7 Mizuno Northern Lights 142 8 VVC 16-1 Nike 9 VVC 15-1 Nike 10 Mizuno Northern Lights 15B 11 Mizuno Northern Lights 15R 12 Eden Prairie 15 Black 13 VVC 16-2 Swoosh 14 Mizuno Northern Lights 131 15 Freeze 15-1 16 Mizuno Northern Lights 15W 17 Shakopee 16-1 18 Freeze 16-2 19 Eden Prairie 16 Black 20 VVC 16-3 Elite 21 VVC 14-1 Nike 22 VVC 15-2 Swoosh 23 Shakopee 16-2 24 Croix Attack 16-1 25 Hastings Heat 16-1 26 New Prague 15-1 27 Freeze 15-2 28 Farmington 16-2 29 PEM KaBoom 16-1 30 Waconia 14-1 31 Southern Extreme 16-1 32 New Prague 16-1 33 Croix Attack 15-1 34 SAJO 15 35
    [Show full text]
  • Přehled Českého Nemovitostního Trhu Czech Real Estate Market Survey
    PŘEHLED ČESKÉHO NEMOVITOSTNÍHO TRHU CZECH REAL ESTATE MARKET SURVEY PENTA titulka Trend Report FINAL.indd 1 23.02.17 13:54 Generální partner ARTN AREMD General Partner Partneři ARTN AREMD Partners The content of Trend Report 2017 is based on the expert discussion of AREMD members, their own analysis and prognosis of future developments, and should be considered a discussion material. We welcome your comments and reactions at [email protected]. Association for Real Estate Market Development thanks to all experts who contributed to the production of the publication: Diblík Ondřej, Lexxus Drtina Tomáš, GfK Czech Frait Jan, Česká národní banka Fröhlichová Tereza, ACHOUR & PARTNERS advokátní kancelář Hejlová Hana, Česká národní banka Hlaváček Michal, Česká národní banka Holub Emil, Clifford Chance Chaloupka Radek, KPMG Kaděrová Martina, AREMD Klapalová Zdenka, Knight Frank Klas Přemysl, KPMG Česká republika Klečka Karel, Patria investiční společnost Kosman Kamil, KAAP Media Kostrounová Lenka, ČSOB Kozáková Daniela, Havel, Holásek & Partners Mládek Martin, Invicta Law, advokátní kancelář Mocková Marie, Hypoteční banka Novák Pavel, Knight Frank Nováková Hana, Invicta Law, advokátní kancelář Pažitka David, Klépierre Pácal Jiří, Central Europe Holding Polák Radek, Trigema Sadil Jan, Hypoteční Banka Soural Marcel, Trigema Svoboda Prokop, Svoboda &Williams Šindelářová Lenka, BNP Paribas Real Estate Czech Republic Špaček Ondřej, KPMG Česká republika Štys Daniel, CBRE Toman Petr, KPMG Česká republika Vlk Ondřej, Colliers Association for Real Estate Market
    [Show full text]
  • EIA in Prague, Tables Informace Z Ročenky Praha ŽP 2004, Tabulky
    EIA in Prague, tables informace z ročenky Praha ŽP 2004, tabulky Tab. - Overview of the number of notices at the level of MHMP pursuant to the Act No. 244/1992 Code within the period from 1. 9. 2003 to 31. 8. 2004) EIA activity Date of notification Date of public hearing, Issuing phase of the EIA process of Statement Second intensification of the Central 21. 12. 2001 Notification without documentation Waste Water delivered Treatment Plant Prague, Troja Island, Prague 6 Source: OŽP MHMP Tab. - Overview of EIA activities pursuant to the Act No. 244/1992 Code processed by the MŽP ČR, state from 1. 9. 2003 to 31. 8. 2004 EIA activity Date of notification Date of public hearing, Issuing phase of the EIA process of Statement Prague ring road, construction 520, 28. 2. 2001 Additional information Březiněves - Satalice Exit 4D1 and transport connection of 18. 7. 2001 Cancelled on the West 15. 1. 2004 Commercial Zone Průhonice Fast-train railway Prague–Ruzyně 21. 12. 2001 Public hearing on 25. 4. 2003, Airport–Kladno, documentation returned to add I phase other alternative route Source: OŽP MHMP Tab. - Overview of EIA activities under the responsibility of the OŽP MHMP pursuant to the Act No. 100/2001 Code, status from 1. 9. 2003 to 31. 8. 2004 (Order number means the order of the EIA process in the EIA Information System since the Act No. 100/2001 Code has become effective, i.e. since 1. 1. 2002.) No. Name of activity Date of the EIA Conclusion of the Phase of the EIA project notification preliminary procedure 003 Printing house 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Position of Prague on the International Tourism Market 1
    International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development Volume 5 ISSN 1849-7020 (Print) Issue 6 ISSN 1849-7551 (Online) February, 2020 Pages 36-42 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.56.2003 DOI: 10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.56.2003 Position of Prague on The International Tourism Market Jiri Vanicek University of Economy Prague, Czech Republic Abstract: There are not many European countries with such a significant share of the capital city on tourism (especially incoming tourism) as the Czech Republic. The number of foreign tourists grows significantly in the Czech Republic, and so does the share of Prague. All marketing campaigns aiming to get foreign tourists beyond Prague ended inefficient. The share of Prague on the number of tourists accommodated in standard accommodation facilities on the total number of tourists in the Czech Republic (CZ) is 62%. Prague is also the only region with a higher number of foreign tourists than Czech tourists (85% of tourists in Prague are foreigners). Prague is therefore struggling with overtourism in some attractive areas and must deal with unsustainable development. Keywords: Benchmarking, City tourism, Overtourism, Prague, Urban tourism 1. Introduction The number of tourists has grown for seven years in a row in the Czech Republic (ČSÚ, 2019d). Even though the CzechTourism agency has been working on diversification in communication and spreading of awareness of the beauty of other regions in the Czech Republic, most tourists are still headed to Prague. Some areas (main tourist attractions) are visited by excessive numbers of tourists that reach limits of sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic in Co-Operation with Prague City Hall
    Annamaria Veselá Strana 1 22.12.200606 Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic in co-operation with Prague City Hall SINGLE PROGRAMMING DOCUMENT FOR OBJECTIVE 2 FOR THE PRAGUE NUTS 2 REGION IN THE PERIOD 2004 – 2006 THE CZECH REPUBLIC December 2003 CCI: 2003 CZ 16 2 DO 001 TABLE OF CONTENTS I NTRODUCTION ............................................................... .7 1. BASIC DATA ON THE PRAGUE REGION . .10 1.1 Prague – an important city within Central Europe .. .10 1.2 Prague – capital city and regional centre . .12 1.3 Basic features of the region ..................................... .13 1.3.1 Basic geographical data, administrative division and structure of s ettlement in the P rague region ........................................................................................... .13 1.3.2 Demographic indicators and the social environment . .14 2. ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SITUATION OF THE REGION . .18 2.1 The region’s performance and the sectoral structure of the economy . .18 2.2 Human resources and the labour market . .24 2.3 Technical infrastructure ..................................... .29 2.4 Transport infrastructure and services . .32 2.5 The environment . .33 2.6 Institutional infrastructure facilities of the region ....................................... .36 2.7 Supportive measures implemented in the region . .37 2.7.1 Support for small and medium-sized enterprises . .38 2.7.2 Development of human resources .................................... .41 2.7.3 Technical facilities and services of the area . .41 2.7.4 Transport . .42 2.7.5 Information society . .43 3. SELECTION AND BASIC FEATURES OF THE AREA SPECIFIED FOR THE P URPOSES OF SPD OBJECTIVE 2 . .44 3.1 Criteria and selection methods . .44 3.2 Analysis of problems of the selected area .
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Plan to the Capital City of Prague Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for 2018 – 2019: a Summary
    Imple me nta tio n Plan to the Capital City of Prague Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for 2018 – 2019 June 2018 Implementation Plan to the Capital City of Prague Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for 2018 – 2019: A summary The Implementation Plan develops the Capital City of Prague Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (hereinafter the Adaptation Strategy) approved by Prague Council Decision No. 1723 of July 18, 2017 aiming at enhancing a long-term resilience of the Capital City of Prague against climate change effects. The first part of the document briefly summarises international and national context and framework of climate change adaptations, the Capital City of Prague´s involvement in the Mayors Adapt Initiative, climate change effects and impacts on the city´s territory and main outputs of spatial assessment of vulnerability to climate change impacts. In the second part, pilot projects and measures aiming at five specific targets set by the Adaptation Strategy (A – D and F; item E Sustainable mobility is elaborated separately) are presented. Measures and pilot projects included into Implementation Plan to the Capital City of Prague Climate Change Adaptation Strategy are clustered into five topic groups following the Adaptation Strategy specific targets: (i) measures for the open landscape; (ii) measures for the built-up area and the urban landscape; (iii) measures for adaptations in buildings (iv) measures in risk management and providing citizens with safety and (v) measures in communication, education and public awareness/environmental education among citizens and Prague city districts. Proposals for the individual pilot projects resulted from working group meetings and they are as follows: (a) measures and projects to complement knowledge of the area and processes there; (b) developing methodologies and guidelines; (c) proposals of the particular pilot projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Publication for Foreigners Czech Republic
    MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC The Information Publication for Foreigners in the Czech Republic pro- vides an overview of the basic information on the Czech Republic. It aims to help foreigners coming primarily from outside the EU countries to get InformationInformation PublicationPublication better understanding of common life situations, which they may encounter within the process of integration into the Czech society. Apart from the ba- sic information on the Czech Republic, the Publication informs about the forfor ForeignersForeigners structure and functioning of the public administration dealing with emer- gency situations, education system, healthcare and social security, employ- ment, residence, transport and other issues. Moreover, it should serve as a comprehensible and practical guide, which refers to more detailed infor- CzechCzech RepublicRepublic mation sources in case of further interest in a given field. The information contained in the Publication refers to conditions applicable as of 1. 1. 2011 if not stated otherwise. The Publication is also available in an electronic version at http://www.cizinci.cz, in section Information Materials and Guides and also at http://www.imigracniportal.cz. The Publication has been published in Czech, English, Ukrainian, Russian, Mongolian and Vietnamese. 20112011 ENGLISH VERSIONVERSION Information Publication for Foreigners Czech Republic Prague 2011 © Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic, 2011 ISBN 978-80-7312-068-9 CONTENTS: 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Restless Cities: Lessons from Central Europe
    Prague Restless Cities: Lessons from Central Brno Europe Bratislava based on the training Enhancing Sustainable Urban Development in Local Politics Budapest BY HEINRICH-BÖLL-STIFTUNG e.V., PRAGUE OFFICE · 2018 method Restless Cities: Lessons from Central Europe is based on the training programme Enhancing Sustainable Restless Urban Development in Local Politics organized by the Heinrich Böll Foundation for professionals active in the field of urban planning and development with Cities: a strong interest in cross-sector cooperation and in making our cities more sustainable and inclusive. Lessons The programme was implemented as an educational journey through Central European cities in four the- matic modules between November 2016 and Septem- ber 2017. With a group of 20 participants, we explored from progressive initiatives, policies and pilot projects focusing on affordable housing in Brno, participatory processes in Prague, urban development in Bratislava Central and influencing strategies in the urban development of Budapest. Europe This book is a summary documenting an exploration of projects and people operating in complex political constellations. It aims to enhance the reader’s stra- tegic thinking and orientation in the wide network based on the training of relationships that are typical for city planning and development projects. Enhancing Sustainable Urban Development in Local Politics BY HEINRICH-BÖLL-STIFTUNG e.V., PRAGUE OFFICE · 2018 training info b 22 participants age range DURATION cities 24—56 years 2016/2017 Prague (Czech
    [Show full text]