A phenomenological exploration of music festival experience MOSS, Jonathan Matthew Henderson Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/21509/
This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version MOSS, Jonathan Matthew Henderson (2018). A phenomenological exploration of music festival experience. Doctoral, Sheffield Hallam University.
Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html
Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk March 16, 2018
A PHENOMENOLOGICAL EXPLORATION OF MUSIC FESTIVAL EXPERIENCE
A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
JONATHAN MOSS SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY
Copyright Statement
This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and due acknowledgement must always be made of the use of any of the material contained in, or derived from, this thesis.
ABSTRACT
The study provides an in-depth exploration of music festival experience. The research was positioned in the field of experience and this provided the research with a phenomenological lens. Reflecting on the theories of phenomenological anthropology (Jackson, 1996; Andrews 2006, 2009) and the anthropology of experience (Bruner, 1986, Turner, 1986) this research justified a contrasting epistemic perspective and phenomenological psychology was used to investigate the ideographic experiences of the attendees. This enabled an understanding of how music festival experience effected the lifeworld of the individuals involved. The research is grounded in the philosophy of existential phenomenology and its conceptualisation of experience. The exploration used the philosophical work of Husserl (1936/1999) as its phenomenological foundation. Developing this position, and contrastingly from the phenomenological research of Jackson (2014), the research argues for the interpretative phenomenological (Heidegger, 1927/1962; Merleau-Ponty, 1962) perspective to further understand music festival experience. This is because, by engaging with the phenomenological psychology of Smith, Harre & Van Langenhove, (1995a, 1995b) and Ashworth (2006, 2015), it becomes possible to understand the contribution that the music festi al e pe ie e has to a i di idual s Life o ld. “ ith s et al ; “ ith & Os o s, 2015b) Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) provides a robust framework for understanding the idiographic music festival experience. The Descriptive Experience Sampling (Hurlburt & Heavey, 2001) approach was used to gather data about the experiences of 9 participants before, during and after the Green Man Music festival (a 5-day period), and then later explored in detail during individual phenomenological interviews. These interviews were carried out between 24- hou s afte the festi al. Usi g “ ith s IPA app oa h ; “ ith & Osborn, 2015b) the interviews generated rich data as the interviewer and each participant dis ussed the i fo atio e o ded du i g the aptu e p o ess. This p o ided deepl idiographic accounts of music festivals experience. Analysis showed 'Universals' (Ashworth, 2015) emerged which provided both a detailed picture of music festival experience and how the lifeworld of the individual was affected. These universals were then used to develop the Ideographic Map of Music Festival Experience. This is an illustrative conceptualisation of the shared, yet subjective, journeys taken by the participants during the Green Man Festival and provides an understanding of music festival experience which is in line with theories that articulate the need for experiences to be understood within the o te t of the i di idual s everyday life (Uriely, 2005), and as a development of their lifeworld (Flowers, Larkin & Smith, 2009) and life story (Guignon, 2012). The findings also provided further idiographic perspectives about theories of experience including: flow (Csikszentmihályi, 1990), liminality and communitas (Turner, 1969, 1974, 1979), and existential authenticity (Cohen, 2007, 2010). The Descriptive Experience Sampling method and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis were also able to provide findings that o t i ute to K uege s a, 2014b) Hypothesis of Individual Extended Emotions and his Hypothesis of Collective Extended Emotions. Moreover, the analysis showed evidence of how this theory combined and contributed to existing theories within experience research. Through this ideographic investigation, music festival experience was shown to be fluctuating, dynamic and oscillating. It was also found that while egati e e otio s e e p ese t, these still fo ed a i po ta t pa t of the pa ti ipa t s
Page | i experience. Past models of music festival experience, due to their managerial prerogatives, have tended to ignore these negative emotions (Lee & Kyle, 2013; Getz, 2012; Morgan, 2008), but this research argues that they should be acknowledged so that meaning, or insights can be derived from them (Jackson, 2014; Ziakas & Boukas, 2014) and therefore a richer u de sta di g of the effe t upo the i di iduals life o ld a e de eloped. I doi g so, the ethod s appli a ilit a d adapta ilit e e e ha ed to justif usi g the fo futu e studies.
Page | ii
List of contents
List of figures viii List of tables viii Acknowledgements ix
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 History and development 1
1.2 Theoretical context 3
1.3 Researching experience and music festivals 4
1.4 The critical and cultural turn 5
1.5 Positivism to phenomenology 7
1.6 Repositioning music festival experience research 9
1.7 The field of e pe ie e esea h 10
1.8 The esea he s pe spe ti e 11 1.9 Green Man festival 13
1.10 Research question 14
1.11 Aims and objectives 15
1.12 Structure of the thesis 16
1.13 Concluding overview of the introduction 17
Chapter 2: Festivals
2.1 Introduction 18
2.2 Festival development 18
2.3 Music development 19
2.4 Festival theory 21
2.5 Festivalisation and festivalscape 21
2.6 Characteristics of music festivals 23
2.7 Music festival as a planned event 23
2.8 Motivations to attendance 26
2.9 The consumption of experience 30
Page | iii
Chapter 3: Experience
3.1 Introduction 34
3.2 Contextualising leisure and tourism research and music festival experience 37
3.3 The field of experience 39
3.4 Erfahrung and erlebnis 40
3.5 Embodiment of experiences 44
3.6 Anthropology of experience 44
3.7 Perspectives about lifeworld 45
3.8 Experience within tourism research 47
3.9 Inter-experience 48
3.10 Liminality 49
3.11 Liminoid spaces 50
3.12 Communitas 51
3.13 Flow and optimal experience 53
3.14 Authenticity 56
3.15 Music festivals and phenomenological research 58
3.16 Conclusion 61
Chapter 4: Methodology
4.1 Introduction 62
4.2 Ontology 63
4.3 Critical realism 64
4.4 Emergence theory 65
4.5 False beliefs 66
4.6 Epistemology 66
4.7 The phenomenological philosophy 67
4.7.1 Origins of phenomenological philosophy 67
4.7.2 The five assumptions of phenomenological psychology 71
4.7.3 Emotions and phenomenological psychology 73
4.8 De zi s assu ptio s of e otio a d e pe ie e 74
Page | iv
4.9 Music festival experience and the development of the i di iduals lifeworld 77 4.10 Existential phenomenology and interpretative phenomenological analysis 78
4.11 Contributions to the lifeworld 79
4.12 Neurophenomenology, descriptive experience sampling and music festival experience research 80
4.12.1 Theoretical perspective of neurophenomenology 80
4.12.2 K uege s h pothesis of i di idual e te ded emotions 82
4.12.3 K uege s h pothesis of olle ti e e te ded emotions 85 4.12.4 The contribution to neurophenomenology 88
4.13 Descriptive experience sampling (DES) 88
4.13.1 Justification of method 89
4.13.2 Experience sampling and researching the everyday experience 89
4.13.3 Experience sampling in music and emotion research 90
4.14 Limitations of approach 91
4.15 Design and implementation 93
4.15.1 Choosing cases 93
4.15.2 Recruitment 94
4.15.3 Participant incentives 94
4.15.4 Research site: Green Man, 2014 95
4.16. Equipment 95
4.16.1 Pre-briefing 96
4.16.2 Pa ti ipa t details a d esea he s a kg ou d 97 4.16.3 Design and implementation 98
4.16.4 Cases, time, durations, location 99
4.16.5 Structure, recording, reporting 99
4.17 Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) 100
4.17.1 IPA - History and development 100
4.17.2 Analysis of the data 101
4.17.3 Case by case 102
Page | v
4.17.4 Analysis of the transcripts 102
4.18 Validity, reflexivity and ethics 106
4.18.1 Validity 106
4.18.2 Validity framework 107
4.18.3 Reflexivity 107
4.18.4 Personal position 108
4.18.5 Ethics 109
4.18.6 Conclusion 109
Chapter 5: Findings
5.1 Introduction 110
5.2 The neuro-physical territory 110
5.2.1 Physical relaxation and sleep 110
5.2.2 Physical responses to external stimuli: live music, weather, climate, landscape 111
5.2.3 Corporeal imperative: fatigue, body temperature, physical exhaustion, sustenance, washing, expelling 114
5.2.4 Temporary abandonment of corporeal norms: corporeal hedonism, bodily routines and rituals 119
5.3 The psychological territory– the internal elements 121 5.3.1 Anticipation: pre-festival anticipation, experiential
Inequality 121
5.3.2 Past experiences 127
5.3.3 Identity: relief from everyday self 130
5.3.4 Wellbeing: general statements about wellbeing, time and space for; relaxation, reconnection, reflection and meditation 135
5.3.5 Flow: flow experience, absent flow, unexpected flow 137
5.3.6 Flow experience 138
5.3.7 Absent flow 139
5.3.8 Unexpected flow 140
5.4 The psycho-social and cultural territory – the external elements 141 5.4.1 Liminality and communitas 141
Page | vi
5.4.2 Space and place 146
5.5 Participant reflections on the descriptive experience sampling method 151
5.5.1 Pa ti ipa ts efle tio s 151
Chapter 6: Discussion
6.1 Main emergences 154
6.2 The idiographic map of music festival experience 154
6.3 The findings and the literature 158
6.4 Liminal and liminoid 159
6.5 Communitas and flow 160
6.6 Existential authenticity 162
6.7 Phenomenological psychology and the lifeworld of the participants 163
6.8 Lifeworld and the music festival experience 164
6.9 Contributions to neurophenomenology 165
6.10 K uege s h pothesis of i di idual a d ollective extended emotions 166
6.11 Experience research and events management 167
6.12 Experience in tourism and leisure studies 170
6.13 Descriptive experience sampling 172
Chapter 7: Conclusions
7.1 A summary of exploring a music festival from a phenomenological perspective 173
7.2 Aims and objectives 174
7.3 Significant research outcomes in experience research 174
7.4 Research contribution to event management 175
7.5 Expanding phenomenological research in event management research 176
7.6 The idiographic map of music festival experience 177
7.7 Descriptive experience sampling, music festival experience and neurophenomenology 177
Page | vii
7.8 Limitations of the descriptive experience sampling method 177
7.9 Future research recommendations 178
7.10 Personal reflection about the research journey 178
7.11 Conclusion 180
References 182
Appendices
Appendix 1: Table showing research philosophy and methodological approach 210 Appendix 2: Pre-brief information sheet 212 Appendix 3: Informed consent 214 Appendix 4: Debrief material 215 Appendix 5: Green Man (2014) site map 218 Appendix 6: Green Man 2014 poster 219 Appendix 7: Interpretative phenomenological analysis process 220
List of figures
Figure 1: Summary of motivational factors to attend festivals 30 Figure 2: The model of experience economy 32 Figure 3: The phenomenological research agenda in event management 59 Figure 4: The essential structures of the popular music festivalgoer 60 Figure 5: The philosophical position and data collection methods to explore experience of music festivals 64 Figure 6: The ideographic map of music festival experience 157
List of tables
Table 1: Developmental eras of the popular music festival 20 Table 2: A summary of event motivations studies: result and approach 28 Table 3: Overview of definitional approach research in tourism experiences 37 Table 4: Overview of research method in tourism experience research publications 38 Table 5: Csiksze t ihál i s eight components of flow 55 Table 6: I.P.A Stages 1-2: Reading and initial note taking 104 Table 7: Emergent themes 104 Table 8: I.P.A. Stage 4: Super-ordinate themes/universals 105 Table 9: Core principles for evaluating the validity of qualitative research 108 Table 10: The emergent universals from the primary data 154
Page | viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would sincerely thank my supervision team, Dr Peter Whalley, Dr Ian Elsmore and Dr Richard Tresidder. They have been a source of constant support, guidance and patience through the course of this research.
A very special and heartfelt thanks to my wife, Dr. Joanna Gibson who has endured this PhD journey with me every step of the way and has done so with love, understanding, support and strength. Thank you also to my family: my mother Verity, my brother Robin and his wife Kristy, who in ways too numerous to mention, have helped me in this endeavour.
This thesis is dedicated to my father Peter Moss who was not able to see me finish it, but who I think of every day, so I am sure he knows. He was a loving and caring father and I know he would have been very proud of this.
Thank you to all of my colleagues at Sheffield Hallam University, the opportunity to undertake and the support which has led to its conclusion.
Lastly, thank you to those who participated in this research because without their involvement and willingness to share their experiences of the music festival, this research would never have been completed.
The deeper we explore space, the more we know about where we are.
Page | ix
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 History and development
No longer the cauldron of rebellion, counter culture or fringe political movements, music festivals are now a core element of leisure and tourism. The growth, development and professionalisation of music festivals over the last 30 to 40 years has seen them become something very different from their earlier incarnations. Music festivals can generate enormous revenue and in 2011 the whole sector was calculated to have been worth £42.2 billion in the UK (Business Visits and Event Partnership, 2011) and in 2015, $1 trillion in the USA (Kear, 2015). Events management has seen considerable growth as an industry in the last two decades with significant economic, socio-cultural and political impacts for the host community or destination (Arcodia & Whitford, 2006). Furthermore, music festivals have developed to become an integral part of the tourism experience (Picard and Robinson, 2006) and a key marketing strategy (Crowther & Donlan, 2011). They have grown in number, size and attendance (Abreu-Novais & Arcodia, 2013). Music festival attendance and the popularity of live music have grown in the face of declining recorded music sales (Brown & Knox, 2016; Anderton, 2011). This trend has been driven by the internet and the same technology that has slowed recorded music sales (Stone, 2008). Current reports show that this sector of events is worth approximately £3.8 billion, with 9.5 million people travelling to live music events annually (UK Music, 2015). Between 2013 and 2014 there was a 34% increase to 20 million social media conversations about music festivals (Eventbrite, 2014). This suppo ts Holt s argument that the increase developed during a decline in traditional media, with music festivals forming a key part of the hybrid media economy (Lessig, 2008). In addition to their economic benefits, arts and music festivals have also been recognised as effective ways of enhancing community cohesion and reducing social exclusion (Bennett & Silva, 2006). This perspective is echoed by government reports which identify the role of music as an important factor in enabling the growth of understanding between people from different cultural backgrounds (Department for Culture, Media & Sport 2008). Music festivals are now tourism attractions, image builders and economic engines for the host community (Manthiou et al., 2014). They are also now seen as drivers of tourism with the U.K economy receiving £4 billion from music tourism in 2016. Within that figure, 65 million music tourists from abroad spent £2.5 billion in the UK. A figure set to grow to 40 million spending £31.5 billion by 2020. (Wish You Were Here, 2017). The U.K. Music Report (2013) calculated that 24,251 jobs are supported by music tourism in the U.K.
Such is the strength in this sector that even poor weather and a steep economic downturn have not had a negative impact (Watson, 2014). Smaller, independent festivals have also come together to form the Association of Independent Festivals (AIF) to provide strength in unity. Its membership has grown from 17 in 2008 to 44 in 2014. Their six -year report, AIF: 6-year report, 2014 , (Webster, 2014) found that the number of festivals registered on eFestivals had grown from 0 to 1000 since the year 2000. They found that the average festivalgoer spends £395 per festival, with a total spend between 2010 to 2013 at those independent festivals of £7.95m. This means that the estimated spend, including tickets, between 2010-2014 was £1.01 billion. Furthermore, each attendee contributed £30.77 to the festi al s local community, meaning that between 2010 and 2013 £60m was spent in festi als su ou di g areas – rising to £77m for the five-year period 2010 -2014. These figures are supported by a Mintel report (2015), which shows that the industry as a whole grew by nearly 50% between 2010 and 2015 (47.6%), with 75% of the spend on ticket price and the remaining 25% on secondary items such as food, drinks and merchandise. Statistica.com (2016) state that in the UK between 2012 and 2014, 3.5 million people attended a music festival. In the US,
Page | 1
32 million people go to at least one festival per year; 14.7 million of which are millennials (Lynch, 2015). By 2020, the music festival value (based on income) is estimated to reach £2 billion a year (Business Visits and Event Partnership, 2011). The high numbers of attendees at these music festivals have led to festivals like SXSW generating 1 million tweets (Eventbrite/Music Festival Study, 2014) and for up to 15 Terabytes of data being used at Glastonbury in 2014 (Bostock, 2016). This is evidence that music festivals attract large numbers of people and are strong income generators, and that festivalgoers strongly engage with social media to communicate and share their experiences with fellow attendees and those at home. It can be argued that this shows how significant an experience they are for the attendees.
One of the reasons for this exponential growth in attendance and value is the way in which festivals have changed over the last 50 years. No longer the sanctuary of a rebellious counter culture, festival attendance is now seen more as a gentrified weekend break of culture and arts, of inclusion and acceptance (McKay, 2000, 2015). Whether this is good or bad is not the discussion here, but it is indicative of how society and festivalgoers who attend them have changed and how the industry itself them has also evolved. For example, in 2014 Latitude Festival was awarded the Silver Level Award by Attitude is E e thi g a d thei Cha te of Best P a ti e i e og itio of the festi al s o going commitment to access and inclusion. Latitude has developed a loyal deaf and disabled customer base; their disabled ticket sales have increased year-on-year by 36 per cent, with ticket sales having tripled since 2009 (Measuring Music, 2014).
In a bid to diversify and thrive, music festivals are developing and adapting. Anderton (2011, 2015) recognises two trajectories within the outdoor rock and pop music festival sector since the free festival movement of the 1960s and 1970s. First there is the emergence of the more overtly commercial festival. The festivals involved seek multiple sponsorships and brand partners, and there is no p ete e at ei g i depe de t . Examples include Reading/Leeds, the V Festivals and T in the Park. The other trajectory is rooted in a post-hippie countercultural heritage and is demonstrated in the contemporary presence of a non-corporate, ethically minded, environmentally friendly sustainability agenda on the part of organisers who are reluctant to engage in corporate sponsorships, and in the festivalgoers, who are attracted to these kinds of event. This type of festival also includes experiences beyond the music, including workshops, participatory arts and areas for complimentary or alternative healing and health.
These figures help to demonstrate the importance of understanding why people choose to spend their money in this way. Webster, (2014) conducted research for the AIF 2014 report into what brings people to their festivals. Researched across a 6-year period, the most i po ta t fa to as the general atmosphere and overall vibe, character and quality of the event , at 53.2% of those questioned (p.190). This is in line with a number of other key pieces of research into this area which show that the key reasons to attend are based around socialisation, novelty, music programme, entertainment, cultural exploration and escape (Gelder & Robinson, 2009; Bowen & Daniels, 2005; Nicholson & Pearce, 2001; Crompton & McKay, 1997). These studies will be discussed in more depth later but are mentioned here because over a 17-year period, there is significant alignment in their research conclusions. When also considering the impact of festivals and their financial value there is significant financial evidence, but another reason that music festivals have thrived over the last 15 years is because they also have demonstrated significant cultural and social value. The cultural and social value of festivals is much more difficult to measure, but as Behr, Brennan & Cloonan (2014) stated they can include such dimensions as:
Page | 2
• Catharsis • An escape from reality • A release from the everyday • The chance to meet new friends and cement existing friendships • Getting back to nature • Participation and being part of the spectacle • A chance to experiment with utopia, albeit only fleetingly. To close, music festival growth has been marked over the last 15-20 years and shows little sign of abating (Mintel, 2016). It provides a great deal of revenue to multiple stakeholders and has developed into a highly-professionalised component of the service sector. Festivals now attract millions of attendees globally and for those who attend they engage and satisfy a wide range of motivations. Beyond the financial considerations, festivals offer cultural and social benefits and, as McKay (2000, 2015, p.29) notes, the still ha e the pote tial to tu the o ld upside do [and] invert social hie a h a d allo a special fluid state where social e pe i e tatio a o u . In acknowledgment of the nature of music festival experience, Firth (2007) applies a theory from Gestalt psychology and sees festivals as more than the sum of their parts. Therefore, the festival experience is now, less all about the music than one in which music forms a part of the overall experience (Watson, 2014). It is the idiographic, lived experience of the music festival attendee which forms the central focus of this research and it is understanding the idiographic, lived experience of the music festival attendee which forms the central focus of this research.
1.2 Theoretical Context
As various reports (Kear 2015; Mintel 2012, 2016), research articles (Ballantyne, Ballantyne & Packer, 2013) and textbooks (Sharples, Crowther & May, 2014; Gelder & Robinson, 2009; Bowdin, 2005) demonstrate, events management research has been emerging as a distinct subject of study following its investigation from within many other disciplines, particularly tourism research, for a number of years (Andrews & Leopold, 2013; Chang, 2011). Events and festivals, once seen as an important segment of tourism, now stand connected to, but distinct from, tourism and leisure studies (Getz, 2010; Gelder & Robinson, 2009). Moreover, according to Getz (2012a), events have direct connections with specific areas of study, like performance study, but also with broader academic disciplines such as economics and sociology.
Due to the growth in the music festival industry sector there has also been an increase in music festival experience research. Broadly speaking, this body of research has tended to address one of two business focused questions: the first is what motivates people to attend these music festivals (Brown & Knox, 2016; Abreu-Novais & Arcordia, 2013; Tkaczynski & Rundle-Thiele, 2013; Gelder & Robinson, 2009; Li & Petrick, 2006; Bowen & Daniels, 2005; Nicholson & Pearce, 2001; Crompton & McKay, 1997) and the second is (how to enhance) the quality of experience at music festivals (Manthiou et al., 2014; Cole & Chancellor, 2008; Lee et al., 2008; Morgan 2008; Cole & Scott, 2004). These two research questions have enabled event managers to better understand what attracts attendees to music festivals so that they can then be designed to attract the optimum number of people and also boost satisfaction, loyalty and the intention to revisit. These papers however also highlight that event management research has strongly maintained a business focused perspective (Andrews & Leopold, 2013). Event management research has developed and there are notable exceptions to this perspective, but the point is made here to illustrate a predominant research focus.
Page | 3
1.3 Researching experience and music festivals
The reason for this predominant business research focus is clear: without attracting attendees the e ould e o usi festi als a d ithout e ha i g the atte dees e pe ie e s , the music festival(s) would struggle to be sustainable. Without these two factors, issues of music festivals as tourist attractions, drivers of cultural growth, increasers of diversity and community cohesion and a number of economic implications, they are unable to develop a positive impact or legacy. Therefore, attendee experience research is vital to the event management subject and industry. It is for this reason that some research has strived to become increasingly advanced and insightful. This is evidenced by research into the commercialisation of the carnivalesque (Anderton, 2008), real-time e aluatio of audie es B o & Hutto , , a d atte dees e otio s du i g a usi festi al Lee & Kyle, 2013). These studies will be discussed further in the literature review but are listed here to illustrate how the concept of experience is addressed within the literature. Music festival experience is i easi gl see as a out of the o di a phe o e o that a e a aged a ipulati g factors that are identified to effect it.
This thesis argues that for the development of event management theory and for industry growth it is important that this predominant focus changes and furthermore, this will be achieved through interpretative research approaches. An example of this is to consider the concept of experience from a social psychology perspective, which sees experience as a human phenomenon and places the research focus on the relationships of people and in addition, not only in observable behaviour but also by the inferences of peoples i e li es Al o k & “ada a, . Ea l e e t management research into motivations to attend music festivals, for example Crompton and MacKay (1997); Bowen & Daniels (2005), used social psychology theories of leisure researchers like those of Iso-Ahola (1982) to underpin their studies, but ultimately reduced their findings to broad generalised categories that offered few subjective insights. Moreover, current research like that of Brown and Knox (2016) indicates that there has been little theoretical development around the motivations to attend music festivals in the last 20 years. This supports Abreu-Novais & Arcodia s ie that, while there are a number of studies in this area, the lack of methodological breadth means that this area of research is still under explored. This is because the studies into event motivation have predominantly used quantitative research methods to carry out research from a reductionist perspective which aim to generate generalisable findings. If broader theories are used, it is still conducted with a similarly positivist perspective, rather than one which is interpretative or holistic. Chalip (2006a, 2006b) argues that this economic and reductionist insistence ignores the social value that events can generate. There are notable exceptions to this (Ayob, Wahid & Omar, 2013) and some of the research into motivations to attend music festivals does have its roots in social psychology (Abreu-Novais & Arcodia, 2013). There is only one paper, however, which develops its framework specifically for the event management subject (Getz & Cheyne, 2002). Perhaps this is because as Benckendorff & Pearce (2012, p.2) stated, social psychology has a sprawling array of theories, methods and levels of analysis as its researchers attempt to forge a scientific approach to the analysis of people's behaviour and experience . This business focus therefore, has driven the subject forward but it can also be argued that there is now a need for a wider perspective. The research conducted to date has largely ignored the full investigative scope of events and festivals and this means that by overlooking the width and breadth of investigation, it has also changed the very nature of what events and festivals are. This is supported by Turner (1982) who argues that the historical and cultural roots of music festivals are anti-structural spheres. They arise when there is a form of control and a cultural space is used to invert dominant social relations, challenge ideologies and take marginalised identities and issues back to the
Page | 4 centre. They can also be a form of protest or resistance against western capitalism (Rojek, 1999, 2013) as well as a means of social networking and solidarity (Eyerman, 2002). The use of music festivals as events for the counter-culture or socialist movements can be seen by the role of folk festivals during the 20th century and in the 1960s when they were a voice of a rebellion towards a dominant parent culture (Bennett, 2001).
Waterman (1998) widens this debate and develops the argument for events research to develop beyond its predominant business focus, because festivals are not inclusive events and should remain elitist as this is the primary mechanism for cultural development. They are actually the expression of interests by socially and politically dominant groups and it is the commercialisation of them that weakens the growth of culture. The tension of festivals to be a celebration of art and of enterprise is referred to as a powerful force p.67). To illustrate this Waterman (1998) raises the issue of who is invited and who is not invited. Festivals give the appearance of inclusivity but operate exclusion strategies and highlight symbolic barriers. Furthermore, Jeong and Santos (2004) not only recognise this social division but argue that events are attempts by the socio-politically dominant to e e ise a d de o st ate thei po e . This is do e offe i g the asses easo s fo celebrations which serve as a distraction and diversion from real issues. The paper that this reference is taken from was written over 10 years ago and was concerned with a festival in South Korea, however it seems that neither time nor culture have rendered this irrelevant if one considers the large televised festivals that have occurred in this country in the last couple of years such as the Royal wedding (BBC, 2011) and the jubilee (BBC, 2012). The festival has developed but has become increasingly gentrified with a widening middle-class appeal (Bloodworth, 2012; Reader, 2012).
Wilks (2009, 2011) agrees with Waterman (1998) that music festival research should be studied with an acknowledgement of their complexity and of their social-cultural issues. Taking this further, and in line with this thesis, it is this type of research that can inform both their management and their sponsorship (Oakes, 2003). Festivals would also be a suitable context to take forward other research suggestions for further social and cultural research, offering the chance to study activities within a defined and bounded setting (Wilks, 2009, p.6). Researching music festival experience facilitates insights into these socio-cultural issues because they provide a spectrum of tastes and genres, they are bound in a specific space and they are increasingly prolific in both number and in size (Wilks, Ibid.). The research however, must be philosophically aligned to methods that enable findings to emerge that contain meaning and not sole measurement (Holloway, Brown & Shipway, 2010). Therefore, to enhance the potential of this emerging research, it is argued that event management research needs to ensure the development of the critical diversity and cultural turn within its subject area.
1.4 The critical and cultural turn in event management research
The research aims to contribute to the emerging critical debates within music festival research and in doing so to contribute to the development of the cultural and critical turn in event management research. Moving event management research under a socio-psycho-geographical lens requires a shift in theoretical emphasis, a 'turn' which has occurred in human geography and tourism studies. This turn moves away from the economy to a more culturally and socially based perspective and was rooted in the considerations surrounding consumption. Moving away from a focus on the production of culture, human geography began to investigate its consumption. The importance and relevance of this paradigm shift is summed up by Waterman (1998) who sees that festivals are cultural artefacts
Page | 5