DOCSLIB.ORG

316(B) Supporting Documentation for NPDES Nutrien Ltd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
316(B) Supporting Documentation for NPDES Nutrien Ltd 316(b) Supporting Documentation for NPDES Nutrien Ltd. Permit Renewal Kennewick Fertilizer Operations NPDES Permit WA0003671 – Kennewick Facility and NPDES Permit WA0003727 – Finely Facility 30 June 2020 Project No.: 0549532 The business of sustainability Signature Page 30 June 2020 316(b) Supporting Documentation for NPDES Permit Renewal Kennewick Fertilizer Operations NPDES Permit WA0003671 – Kennewick Facility and NPDES Permit WA0003727 – Finely Facility Kennewick, Washington David P. Edwards, L.G. Mich ael F. Mendes, L. G. Partner Project Manager Kurtis Schlicht Suzanne Dolberg, P.E. Technical Lead Deputy Project Manager Environmental Resources Management 1218 3rd Avenue, Suite 1412 Seattle, Washington 98101 T: +1 425 462 8591 F: +1 425 455 3573 © Copyright 2020 by ERM Worldwide Group Ltd and / or its affiliates (“ERM”). All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior written permission of ERM. www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0549532 Client: Nutrien Ltd. 30 June 2020 Page iii Seattle\Projects\0549532\DM\28730H(316b).docx 316(B) SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR NPDES PERMIT CONTENTS RENEWAL CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 2. §122.21(R)(2) SOURCE WATER PHYSICAL DATA ........................................................................ 3 3. §122.21(R)(3) COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE DATA .................................................. 15 4. §122.21(R)(4) SOURCE WATER BASELINE BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION DATA ........ 18 5. §122.21(R)(5) COOLING WATER SYSTEM DATA ........................................................................ 37 6. §122.21(R)(6) CHOSEN METHOD OF COMPLIANCE WITH IMPINGEMENT MORTALITY STANDARD ...................................................................................................................................... 40 7. §122.21(R)(7) ENTRAINMENT PERFORMANCE STUDIES .......................................................... 41 8. §122.21(R)(8) OPERATIONAL STATUS ......................................................................................... 42 9. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 44 ATTACHMENT 1 FLOW DIAGRAM AND WATER BALANCE ATTACHMENT 2 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ATTACHMENT 3 SITE PHOTOS ATTACHMENT 4 SPECIES LIFE HISTORIES List of Tables Table 1: List of Fish Species Occurring in the Columbia River Table 2: Abundant and Common Fish Species Occurring Near the Kennewick and Finley CWIS Table 3: Summary of Impingement Studies on the Middle Columbia River Table 4: Summary of Species Impinged in the Columbia River Table 5: Mean Length of Fish Impinged on Large and Small Rivers Table 6: Fish and Shellfish Species Susceptible to Impingement at the Kennewick and Finley CWIS Table 7: Fish and Shellfish Species Susceptible to Entrainment at Kennewick and Finley Table 8: Summary of the Risks to Chinook Salmon Related to Intake Structures By Entrainment (Energy Northwest 2019) Table 9: Typical Spawning Periods of Species Susceptible to Impingement at the Kennewick and Finley CWIS Table 10: Species Life Stages and Periods of Occurrence Most Susceptible to Entrainment at the Kennewick and Finley CWIS Table 11: USFWS and NOAA Threatened, Endangered and Protected Aquatic Species Table 12: Major Upgrades within the last 15 years at the Finley Facility List of Figures Figure 1: General Location of the Kennewick and Finley CWIS on the Columbia River Figure 2: Location of the Kennewick CWIS on the Columbia River Figure 3: River Cross Section at the Kennewick CWIS Figure 4: Location of the Finley CWIS on the Columbia River Figure 5: River Cross Section at the Finley CWIS Figure 6: Bathymetry at the Kennewick and Finley CWIS (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0549532 Client: Nutrien Ltd. 30 June 2020 Page 1 Seattle\Projects\0549532\DM\28730H(316b).docx 316(B) SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR NPDES PERMIT CONTENTS RENEWAL Figure 7: Average monthly stream temperature at USGS Gage 14105700 Columbia River near Dalles, Oregon 2006 through 2020 Figure 8: Average daily river temperature at USGS Gage 14105700 Columbia River near Dalles, Oregon 2006 through 2020 Figure 9: Specific conductance at Washington Department of Ecology Location ID 31A070 1990 through 2020 Figure 10: Dissolved Oxygen at Washington Department of Ecology Location ID 31A070 1990 through 2020 Figure 11: Columbia River Basin Map (U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation) Figure 12: Discharge (cfs) at USGS 12472800 Columbia River below Priest Rapids Dam 1917 through 2020 Figure 13: Expected Hydraulic Zone of Influence at the Kennewick CWIS High Water Conditions with Two Pumps Figure 14: Expected Hydraulic Zone of Influence at the Kennewick CWIS Low Water Conditions with Two Pumps Figure 15: Expected Hydraulic Zone of Influence at the Finley CWIS High Water Conditions with One Pump Figure 16: Expected Hydraulic Zone of Influence at the Finley CWIS Low Water Conditions with One Pump Acronyms and Abbreviations AIF Actual intake flow BTA Best technology available C Celsius CFR Code of Federal Regulations cfs cubic feet per second CWA Clean Water Act CWIS Cooling water intake structures DIF Design intake flow DOE Department of Energy DVM Diel vertical migration E entrainment Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology EPRI Electric Power Research Institute ERM Environmental Resources Management FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FWEE Foundation for Water and Energy Education gpm gallons per minute HGP Hanford Generating Project HZOI Hydraulic zone of influence IM Impingement mortality KFO Kennewick Fertilizer Operations MGD Million gallons per day NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System PNNL Pacific Northwest National Laboratory RM river mile USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGS United States Geological Survey YOY Young of the year www.erm.com Version: 1.0 Project No.: 0549532 Client: Nutrien Ltd. 30 June 2020 Page 2 Seattle\Projects\0549532\DM\28730H(316b).docx 316(B) SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR NPDES PERMIT INTRODUCTION RENEWAL NPDES Permit WA0003671 – Kennewick Facility and NPDES Permit WA0003727 – Finely Facility 1. INTRODUCTION ERM-West, Inc. (ERM), on behalf of Nutrien Ltd. (Nutrien), formerly Agrium Inc. (Agrium), completed a detailed compilation and review of available data and other resources related to meeting the requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA) 316(b) rule issued on 14 October 2014. Nutrien, a manufacturer and wholesaler of nitrogen fertilizers, owns and operates the Kennewick Fertilizer Operations (KFO) facilities. The KFO facilities consist of three non-contiguous facilities located southeast of Kennewick, Washington in rural Benton County. The three facilities are known as the Hedges area, the Kennewick area, and the Finley area. The KFO facilities addressed in this report are the Kennewick and Finley areas (Figure 1). The Hedges facility is not subject to the 316(b) rule requirements and is therefore not addressed in this report. The Kennewick facility is located at 227515 East Bowles Road in Kennewick, Washington. The Kennewick facility is approximately 73 acres and manufactures nitric acid and liquid nitrogen fertilizer solutions. The Kennewick facility includes plant processing units, storage tanks, warehouses, shops, railroad spurs, administrative offices, and parking. The Finley facility is located at 231610 East Game Farm Road in Finley, Washington. The Finley facility receives anhydrous ammonia and stores it in two aboveground spherical pressure tanks and in one atmospheric pressure tank. Pipelines deliver ammonia from the Finley facility to the Kennewick facility, where the ammonia is used to manufacture nitric acid and solution fertilizer. The Finley facility is approximately 27 acres and has storage tanks, warehouses, shops, railroad spurs, administrative offices, and parking. Products are manufactured year-round at both facilities and do not follow seasonal trends. The Kennewick facility has a design intake flow (DIF) of approximately 37 million gallons per day (MGD) based on three circulating pumps, and the Finley facility has a DIF of 64.8 MGD based on five pumps. Both facilities withdraw water from water of the U.S., and use at least 25 percent of the water they withdraw exclusively for cooling purposes. Therefore, the both Kennewick and Finley are subject to requirements under section 316(b) of the CWA for existing regulated facilities that include production processes and product lines. This report was developed pursuant to the CWA 316(b) Rule promulgated on October 14, 2014 and covers those requirements defined and outlined in 40 CFR Section 125.92, 125.94(d), 125.95(a), and 122.21 (r). Focus in this report will be on the application requirements found in 122.21(r)(ii), which covers existing facilities and includes the information listed under (r)(2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), and (8). Nutrien believes the information submitted in this document supports the application requirements under 122.21 and demonstrates the Kennewick and Finley Facilities both operate a best technology available (BTA) that meets the standards for impingement mortality (IM) under 40 CFR §125.94(c)(1). Based on the Kennewick and Finley
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forage Fishes of the Southeastern Bering Sea Conference Proceedings
    a OCS Study MMS 87-0017 Forage Fishes of the Southeastern Bering Sea Conference Proceedings 1-1 July 1987 Minerals Management Service Alaska OCS Region OCS Study MMS 87-0017 FORAGE FISHES OF THE SOUTHEASTERN BERING SEA Proceedings of a Conference 4-5 November 1986 Anchorage Hilton Hotel Anchorage, Alaska Prepared f br: U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Alaska OCS Region 949 East 36th Avenue, Room 110 Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4302 Under Contract No. 14-12-0001-30297 Logistical Support and Report Preparation By: MBC Applied Environmental Sciences 947 Newhall Street Costa Mesa, California 92627 July 1987 CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................. iv INTRODUCTION PAPERS Dynamics of the Southeastern Bering Sea Oceanographic Environment - H. Joseph Niebauer .................................. The Bering Sea Ecosystem as a Predation Controlled System - Taivo Laevastu .... Marine Mammals and Forage Fishes in the Southeastern Bering Sea - Kathryn J. Frost and Lloyd Lowry. ............................. Trophic Interactions Between Forage Fish and Seabirds in the Southeastern Bering Sea - Gerald A. Sanger ............................ Demersal Fish Predators of Pelagic Forage Fishes in the Southeastern Bering Sea - M. James Allen ................................ Dynamics of Coastal Salmon in the Southeastern Bering Sea - Donald E. Rogers . Forage Fish Use of Inshore Habitats North of the Alaska Peninsula - Jonathan P. Houghton ................................. Forage Fishes in the Shallow Waters of the North- leut ti an Shelf - Peter Craig ... Population Dynamics of Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasii), Capelin (Mallotus villosus), and Other Coastal Pelagic Fishes in the Eastern Bering Sea - Vidar G. Wespestad The History of Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasii) Fisheries in Alaska - Fritz Funk . Environmental-Dependent Stock-Recruitment Models for Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasii) - Max Stocker.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of the Bay Goby Genus Eucyclogobius, Endemic to Southern California: Evolution, Conservation, and Decline
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A New Species of the Bay Goby Genus Eucyclogobius, Endemic to Southern California: Evolution, Conservation, and Decline Camm C. Swift1¤, Brenton Spies2, Ryan A. Ellingson2,3, David K. Jacobs2* 1 Emeritus, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007, United States of America, 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States of America, 3 Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Los Angeles, California 90032, United States of America ¤ Current address: 6465 Elmo Road, Cumming, Georgia 30028–4720, United States of America * [email protected] a11111 Abstract A geographically isolated set of southern localities of the formerly monotypic goby genus Eucyclogobius is known to be reciprocally monophyletic and substantially divergent in mito- chondrial sequence and nuclear microsatellite-based phylogenies relative to populations to OPEN ACCESS the north along the California coast. To clarify taxonomic and conservation status, we con- ducted a suite of analyses on a comprehensive set of morphological counts and measures Citation: Swift CC, Spies B, Ellingson RA, Jacobs DK (2016) A New Species of the Bay Goby Genus from across the range of Eucyclogobius and describe the southern populations as a new Eucyclogobius, Endemic to Southern California: species, the Southern Tidewater Goby, Eucyclogobius kristinae, now separate from the Evolution, Conservation, and Decline. PLoS ONE Northern Tidewater Goby Eucyclogobius newberryi (Girard 1856). In addition to molecular 11(7): e0158543. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158543 distinction, adults of E. kristinae are diagnosed by: 1) loss of the anterior supratemporal lat- Editor: Tzen-Yuh Chiang, National Cheng-Kung eral-line canals resulting in higher neuromast counts, 2) lower pectoral and branched caudal University, TAIWAN ray counts, and 3) sets of measurements identified via discriminant analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative PCR Assays for Detecting Loach Minnow (Rhinichthys Cobitis) and Spikedace (Meda Fulgida) in the Southwestern United States
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Quantitative PCR Assays for Detecting Loach Minnow (Rhinichthys cobitis) and Spikedace (Meda fulgida) in the Southwestern United States Joseph C. Dysthe1*, Kellie J. Carim1, Yvette M. Paroz2, Kevin S. McKelvey1, Michael K. Young1, Michael K. Schwartz1 1 United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, MT, United States of America, 2 United States a11111 Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Loach minnow (Rhinichthys cobitis) and spikedace (Meda fulgida) are legally protected Citation: Dysthe JC, Carim KJ, Paroz YM, McKelvey with the status of Endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and are endemic to KS, Young MK, Schwartz MK (2016) Quantitative the Gila River basin of Arizona and New Mexico. Efficient and sensitive methods for moni- PCR Assays for Detecting Loach Minnow ’ (Rhinichthys cobitis) and Spikedace (Meda fulgida)in toring these species distributions are critical for prioritizing conservation efforts. We devel- the Southwestern United States. PLoS ONE 11(9): oped quantitative PCR assays for detecting loach minnow and spikedace DNA in e0162200. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162200 environmental samples. Each assay reliably detected low concentrations of target DNA Editor: Michael Hofreiter, University of York, UNITED without detection of non-target species, including other cyprinid fishes with which they co- KINGDOM occur. Received: April 27, 2016 Accepted: August 18, 2016 Published: September 1, 2016 Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all Introduction copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used Loach minnow (Rhinichthys cobitis) and spikedace (Meda fulgida) are cyprinid fishes that were by anyone for any lawful purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • Marian Penner Bancroft Rca Studies 1965
    MARIAN PENNER BANCROFT RCA STUDIES 1965-67 UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, Arts & Science 1967-69 THE VANCOUVER SCHOOL OF ART (Emily Carr University of Art + Design) 1970-71 RYERSON POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, Toronto, Advanced Graduate Diploma 1989 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY, Visual Arts Summer Intensive with Mary Kelly 1990 VANCOUVER ART GALLERY, short course with Griselda Pollock SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2019 REPUBLIC GALLERY, Vancouver, upcoming in May 2019 WINDWEAVEWAVE, Burnaby, BC, video installation, upcoming in May 2018 HIGASHIKAWA INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHY FESTIVAL GALLERY, Higashikawa, Hokkaido, Japan, Overseas Photography Award exhibition, Aki Kusumoto, curator 2017 REPUBLIC GALLERY, Vancouver, RADIAL SYSTEMS photos, text and video installation 2014 THE REACH GALLERY & MUSEUM, Abbotsford, BC, By Land & Sea (prospect & refuge) 2013 REPUBLIC GALLERY, Vancouver, HYDROLOGIC: drawing up the clouds, photos, video and soundtape installation 2012 VANCOUVER ART GALLERY, SPIRITLANDS t/Here, Grant Arnold, curator 2009 REPUBLIC GALLERY, Vancouver, CHORUS, photos, video, text, sound 2008 REPUBLIC GALLERY, Vancouver, HUMAN NATURE: Alberta, Friesland, Suffolk, photos, text installation 2001 CATRIONA JEFFRIES GALLERY, Vancouver THE MENDEL GALLERY, Saskatoon SOUTHERN ALBERTA ART GALLERY, Lethbridge, Alberta, By Land and Sea (prospect and refuge) 2000 GALERIE DE L'UQAM, Montreal, By Land and Sea (prospect and refuge) CATRIONA JEFFRIES GALLERY, Vancouver, VISIT 1999 PRESENTATION HOUSE GALLERY, North Vancouver, By Land and Sea (prospect and refuge) UNIVERSITY
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES
    ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES Tables STEPHEN T. ROSS University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California ISBN 978-0-520-24945-5 uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 1 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 2 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 1.1 Families Composing 95% of North American Freshwater Fish Species Ranked by the Number of Native Species Number Cumulative Family of species percent Cyprinidae 297 28 Percidae 186 45 Catostomidae 71 51 Poeciliidae 69 58 Ictaluridae 46 62 Goodeidae 45 66 Atherinopsidae 39 70 Salmonidae 38 74 Cyprinodontidae 35 77 Fundulidae 34 80 Centrarchidae 31 83 Cottidae 30 86 Petromyzontidae 21 88 Cichlidae 16 89 Clupeidae 10 90 Eleotridae 10 91 Acipenseridae 8 92 Osmeridae 6 92 Elassomatidae 6 93 Gobiidae 6 93 Amblyopsidae 6 94 Pimelodidae 6 94 Gasterosteidae 5 95 source: Compiled primarily from Mayden (1992), Nelson et al. (2004), and Miller and Norris (2005). uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 3 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 3.1 Biogeographic Relationships of Species from a Sample of Fishes from the Ouachita River, Arkansas, at the Confl uence with the Little Missouri River (Ross, pers. observ.) Origin/ Pre- Pleistocene Taxa distribution Source Highland Stoneroller, Campostoma spadiceum 2 Mayden 1987a; Blum et al. 2008; Cashner et al. 2010 Blacktail Shiner, Cyprinella venusta 3 Mayden 1987a Steelcolor Shiner, Cyprinella whipplei 1 Mayden 1987a Redfi n Shiner, Lythrurus umbratilis 4 Mayden 1987a Bigeye Shiner, Notropis boops 1 Wiley and Mayden 1985; Mayden 1987a Bullhead Minnow, Pimephales vigilax 4 Mayden 1987a Mountain Madtom, Noturus eleutherus 2a Mayden 1985, 1987a Creole Darter, Etheostoma collettei 2a Mayden 1985 Orangebelly Darter, Etheostoma radiosum 2a Page 1983; Mayden 1985, 1987a Speckled Darter, Etheostoma stigmaeum 3 Page 1983; Simon 1997 Redspot Darter, Etheostoma artesiae 3 Mayden 1985; Piller et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Fish Report
    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt Bay Fishes
    Humboldt Bay Fishes ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> ·´¯`·._.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> Acknowledgements The Humboldt Bay Harbor District would like to offer our sincere thanks and appreciation to the authors and photographers who have allowed us to use their work in this report. Photography and Illustrations We would like to thank the photographers and illustrators who have so graciously donated the use of their images for this publication. Andrey Dolgor Dan Gotshall Polar Research Institute of Marine Sea Challengers, Inc. Fisheries And Oceanography [email protected] [email protected] Michael Lanboeuf Milton Love [email protected] Marine Science Institute [email protected] Stephen Metherell Jacques Moreau [email protected] [email protected] Bernd Ueberschaer Clinton Bauder [email protected] [email protected] Fish descriptions contained in this report are from: Froese, R. and Pauly, D. Editors. 2003 FishBase. Worldwide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org/ 13 August 2003 Photographer Fish Photographer Bauder, Clinton wolf-eel Gotshall, Daniel W scalyhead sculpin Bauder, Clinton blackeye goby Gotshall, Daniel W speckled sanddab Bauder, Clinton spotted cusk-eel Gotshall, Daniel W. bocaccio Bauder, Clinton tube-snout Gotshall, Daniel W. brown rockfish Gotshall, Daniel W. yellowtail rockfish Flescher, Don american shad Gotshall, Daniel W. dover sole Flescher, Don stripped bass Gotshall, Daniel W. pacific sanddab Gotshall, Daniel W. kelp greenling Garcia-Franco, Mauricio louvar
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes As a Template for Reticulate Evolution
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 Fishes as a Template for Reticulate Evolution: A Case Study Involving Catostomus in the Colorado River Basin of Western North America Max Russell Bangs University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Evolution Commons, Molecular Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Bangs, Max Russell, "Fishes as a Template for Reticulate Evolution: A Case Study Involving Catostomus in the Colorado River Basin of Western North America" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1847. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1847 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Fishes as a Template for Reticulate Evolution: A Case Study Involving Catostomus in the Colorado River Basin of Western North America A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology by Max Russell Bangs University of South Carolina Bachelor of Science in Biological Sciences, 2009 University of South Carolina Master of Science in Integrative Biology, 2011 December 2016 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. _____________________________________ Dr. Michael E. Douglas Dissertation Director _____________________________________ ____________________________________ Dr. Marlis R. Douglas Dr. Andrew J. Alverson Dissertation Co-Director Committee Member _____________________________________ Dr. Thomas F. Turner Ex-Officio Member Abstract Hybridization is neither simplistic nor phylogenetically constrained, and post hoc introgression can have profound evolutionary effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern, Sequoia National Forest
    Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern Sequoia National Forest Prepared by: Wildlife Biologists and Biologist Planner Regional Office, Sequoia National Forest and Washington Office Enterprise Program For: Sequoia National Forest June 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • 1976-77-Annual-Report.Pdf
    TheCanada Council Members Michelle Tisseyre Elizabeth Yeigh Gertrude Laing John James MacDonaId Audrey Thomas Mavor Moore (Chairman) (resigned March 21, (until September 1976) (Member of the Michel Bélanger 1977) Gilles Tremblay Council) (Vice-Chairman) Eric McLean Anna Wyman Robert Rivard Nini Baird Mavor Moore (until September 1976) (Member of the David Owen Carrigan Roland Parenteau Rudy Wiebe Council) (from May 26,1977) Paul B. Park John Wood Dorothy Corrigan John C. Parkin Advisory Academic Pane1 Guita Falardeau Christopher Pratt Milan V. Dimic Claude Lévesque John W. Grace Robert Rivard (Chairman) Robert Law McDougall Marjorie Johnston Thomas Symons Richard Salisbury Romain Paquette Douglas T. Kenny Norman Ward (Vice-Chairman) James Russell Eva Kushner Ronald J. Burke Laurent Santerre Investment Committee Jean Burnet Edward F. Sheffield Frank E. Case Allan Hockin William H. R. Charles Mary J. Wright (Chairman) Gertrude Laing J. C. Courtney Douglas T. Kenny Michel Bélanger Raymond Primeau Louise Dechêne (Member of the Gérard Dion Council) Advisory Arts Pane1 Harry C. Eastman Eva Kushner Robert Creech John Hirsch John E. Flint (Member of the (Chairman) (until September 1976) Jack Graham Council) Albert Millaire Gary Karr Renée Legris (Vice-Chairman) Jean-Pierre Lefebvre Executive Committee for the Bruno Bobak Jacqueline Lemieux- Canadian Commission for Unesco (until September 1976) Lope2 John Boyle Phyllis Mailing L. H. Cragg Napoléon LeBlanc Jacques Brault Ray Michal (Chairman) Paul B. Park Roch Carrier John Neville Vianney Décarie Lucien Perras Joe Fafard Michael Ondaatje (Vice-Chairman) John Roberts Bruce Ferguson P. K. Page Jacques Asselin Céline Saint-Pierre Suzanne Garceau Richard Rutherford Paul Bélanger Charles Lussier (until August 1976) Michael Snow Bert E.
    [Show full text]