Plumas National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation Final Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plumas National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation Final Environmental Impact Statement United States Department of Agriculture Plumas National Forest Over-snow Vehicle Use Designation Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume III. Appendices F through L Forest Service Plumas National Forest August 2019 Cover image: Snowmobiling at Round Valley Reservoir, Plumas National Forest, Plumas County, California. Photograph taken January 14, 2017 by Erika Brenzovich. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. Over-snow Vehicle Use Designation Final Environmental Impact Statement – Volume III Appendices F through L Over-snow Vehicle Use Designation Final Environmental Impact Statement Plumas National Forest Butte, Lassen, Plumas, Sierra, and Yuba Counties, California Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: CHRISTOPHER CARLTON FOREST SUPERVISOR Plumas National Forest 159 Lawrence Street Quincy, CA 95971 For Information Contact: KATHERINE CARPENTER ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR Plumas National Forest 159 Lawrence Street Quincy, CA 95971 (530) 283-7742 Abstract: The Forest Service proposes to designate snow areas and trails for public over-snow vehicle (OSV) use on the Plumas National Forest. These designations would occur on National Forest System lands within the Plumas National Forest. The Forest Service would also identify designated snow trails where grooming for public OSV use would occur within the Plumas National Forest. This final environmental impact statement (FEIS) discloses the comparative analysis of the options being considered in designating areas and trails of the Plumas National Forest for OSV use. We consider the environmental impacts of a proposed action, a no-action alternative, and four additional action alternatives developed in response to issues, public comments received during the scoping period; multiple interdisciplinary team discussions; coordination with project stakeholders; literature review; and application of the Minimization Criteria (36 CFR 212.55(b)(1-4)). Mail objections to: Randy Moore, Regional Forester USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Attn: Plumas OSV Objection 1323 Club Drive Vallejo, CA 94592 Email objections to: [email protected] Subject: Plumas OSV Objection Objection period: The 45-day objection period starts the day after the Legal Notice to Object is published in the Feather River Bulletin. Plumas National Forest iii Over-snow Vehicle Use Designation Final Environmental Impact Statement – Volume III Appendices F through L Contents Appendix F. Noxious Weed Risk Assessment .............................................................................................. 1 Appendix G. How Cumulative Impacts were Considered ............................................................................ 7 Appendix H. Scoping Comments Categories ............................................................................................. 16 Appendix I. Response to Comments ........................................................................................................... 17 Appendix J. Monitoring ............................................................................................................................ 225 Appendix K. Travel Management Definitions .......................................................................................... 229 Appendix L. Acronyms ............................................................................................................................. 231 Appendix M. Changes to Alternative 2 between DEIS and FEIS ............................................................ 232 List of Tables Table F- 1. Weed infestations in the Plumas OSV use designation project area. ......................................... 2 Table G- 1. Plumas National Forest allotments, livestock type, season of use, animal unit months, and allotment acres .............................................................................................................................................. 9 Table H- 1. Percentage of scoping comment subjects received after publication of the Notice of Intent (2015) .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 Table H- 2. Most common themes identified from scoping comments received in 2015 .......................... 16 Table I- 1. DEIS comment period letters from October 10, 2018 through January 25, 2019 ..................... 17 Table I- 2. DEIS comment period letters from January 1, 2019 through February 8, 2019 ....................... 21 Table I- 3. DEIS comment period letters from February 9, 2019 through March 2, 2019 ......................... 22 Table I- 4. Comment categories, number of comments, and correspondence numbers.............................. 24 Table I- 5. Concern categories, statements, and responses ......................................................................... 33 Table K- 1. Road and trail definitions ....................................................................................................... 229 Plumas National Forest v Over-snow Vehicle Use Designation Final Environmental Impact Statement – Volume III Appendix F. Noxious Weed Risk Assessment Appendix F. Noxious Weed Risk Assessment Five factors of weed spread were analyzed for the proposed Plumas National Forest OSV Use Designation Project. Discussions and determinations of risk (high, moderate, and low) are presented below along with the total risk of weed spread for the proposed project. Summary For all alternatives, the Plumas OSV Use Designation Project carries an overall low risk of spreading or introducing weeds. Existing factors of weeds already present, habitat vulnerability, and non-project weed vectors carry a moderate risk, but no habitat alteration and a relatively small amount of increased weed vectoring is expected from this project. Introduction Noxious weeds generally possess one or more of the following characteristics: aggressive and difficult to manage; poisonous; toxic; parasitic; a carrier or host of serious insects or disease; or being nonnative, new, to or not common to the United States or parts thereof (Forest Service Manual 2900). In order to control noxious weeds the U.S. Forest Service has adopted an integrated weed management approach to reduce the spread of noxious weeds on to, and from, National Forest System lands. The main objective of this integrated approach to weed management is to prevent the introduction and establishment of noxious weed infestations, and control (contain and suppress) existing noxious weed infestations on National Forest System lands (Forest Service Manual 2900). In addition, when any ground-disturbing action or activity is proposed, the Federal agency is required to determine the risk of introducing or spreading noxious weeds associated with the proposed action (Forest Service Manual 2900). On the Plumas National Forest, roadside weed infestations are routinely treated during their active growing season each year. In the Plumas OSV project area, 50 invasive plant species are documented. The table below shows a list of weed species and their acreage of presence near OSV trails and in areas designated for OSV use. The most likely places for possible weed introductions are in areas of concentrated OSV use, such as designated trails and trailheads. OSV trailheads are also accessible by wheeled vehicles during the summer seasons, so the presence of weeds does not necessarily indicate they were brought to the sites as a result of OSV activities. Although there are some differences in designated OSV trails in each alternative, the locations and uses of seven OSV trailheads would be the same for all alternatives. The following
Recommended publications
  • Polar Bear Use of a Persistent Food Subsidy: Insights from Non-Invasive Genetic Sampling in Alaska
    Polar bear use of a persistent food subsidy: Insights from non-invasive genetic sampling in Alaska Jason Herreman1,3 and Elizabeth Peacock2 1North Slope Borough, Department of Wildlife Management, P.O. Box 69, Barrow, AK 99723 USA 2US Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508 USA Abstract: Remains of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) harvested by In˜upiat whalers are deposited in bone piles along the coast of Alaska and have become persistent and reliable food sources for polar bears (Ursus maritimus). The importance of bone piles to individuals and the population, the patterns of use, and the number, sex, and age of bears using these resources are poorly understood. We implemented barbed-wire hair snaring to obtain genetic identities from bears using the Point Barrow bone pile in winter 2010–11. Eighty-three percent of genotyped samples produced individual and sex identification. We identified 97 bears from 200 samples. Using genetic mark–recapture techniques, we estimated that 228 bears used the bone pile during November to February, which would represent approximately 15% of the Southern Beaufort Sea polar bear subpopulation, if all bears were from this subpopulation. We found that polar bears of all age and sex classes simultaneously used the bone pile. More males than females used the bone pile, and males predominated in February, likely because 1/3 of adult females would be denning during this period. On average, bears spent 10 days at the bone pile (median 5 5 days); the probability that an individual bear remained at the bone pile from week to week was 63% for females and 45% for males.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 LAHONTAN MOUNTAIN SUCKER Catostomus Lahontan (Rutter
    LAHONTAN MOUNTAIN SUCKER Catostomus lahontan (Rutter) Status: Moderate Concern. The Lahontan mountain sucker does not appear to be at risk of extinction in California in the near future; however, many populations are declining and their range is fragmented. Description: Mountain suckers are small (adults 12-20 cm TL), with subterminal mouths and full lips that are covered by many large papillae (Moyle 2002). Their lips are protrusible, have deep grooves where the upper and lower lips meet, and a cleft on the middle of the lower lip. The lower lip has two semicircular smooth areas along the inner margin next to a conspicuous cartilaginous plate that is used for scraping. The front of the upper lip is smooth. They have 75-92 scales along the lateral line and 23-37 gill rakers on the first gill arch. Fin rays typically number 10 (range 8-13) and nine for the dorsal and pelvic fins, respectively. An axillary process is easily visible at the base of the pelvic fins. Internally, their intestine is long (up to six times TL), and the lining of the abdominal cavity (peritoneum) is black. Their coloration is brown to olive green on the dorsal and lateral surfaces, white to yellow on their bellies, and dark brown in blotches in a lateral row or line. Mature males have two lateral bands, one red-orange on top of another that is black-green. Spawning males have tubercles covering their bodies and fins, with the exception of the dorsal fin. Tubercles on the enlarged anal fin become especially prominent. Spawning females also have tubercles but only on the top and sides of their heads and bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Newsletter Number Fourteen 2010
    Thomas Lovell Beddoes Society Woodcut of The Dance of Death, from the Nuremberg Chronicle, 1493 The Newsletter Number Fourteen 2010 Beddoes to his Critic ‘Tell the students I obsess, Tell them something’s wrong with me. That medicine will help. Impress Them with your sage psychiatry. ‘Tell them that I’m manic, that These phases alternate with gloom. When others stood for Life, I sat. Let these statements fill the room. ‘And if perhaps you find one doubt, Resist your observations, then, Let the final clincher out: Tell them that I favored men. ‘But when you’ve thus disposed of me, And kept yourself from facing death, Do not think we’re finished. See, I await your dying breath.’ Richard Geyer aris 1856 Alphabet of Death ’s , repro P Frame from Hans Holbein Editorial Welcome to Newsletter 14. It’s two years since the last issue – poor form for an annual! – but here’s evidence that something’s still astir on the Ship of Fools. Members will know that following John Beddoes’ resignation as chairman the Society is in a period of transition. The meeting on 13th March resolved that we will continue to pursue our original aim to publicise and promote the work of Thomas Lovell Beddoes. But there are still difficulties to overcome, the most urgent being to appoint a new chairman and secretary. This must be done at the AGM on 25th September (1 pm at The Devereux, 20 Devereux Court, Essex Street, The Strand, London WC2R 3JJ). We hope that by holding the meeting in London as many members as possible will be able to attend and join the discussion: the Society needs you.
    [Show full text]
  • Bear Aware Checklist Because Most of Alaska Is Bear Country, We All Need to Be Aware of Bears
    Bear Aware Checklist Because most of Alaska is bear country, we all need to be aware of bears. Some of us live in neighborhoods where bears are commonly seen. In those areas, it is especially important when bears are awake (April- November) to keep garbage and other bear attractants out of reach of bears. Directions: Identify items around your home that might attract bears. If you answer “yes” to any questions below, you have some work to do! Refer to the solution sheet on the back to figure out how you can make your home and neighborhood safer. Garbage •Is there any trash outside your house, garage or shed that is not stored in a bear- □ YES □ NO resistant container? Bird Seed •Are there any bird feeders out during the months when bears are awake? Also, are □ YES □ NO there any leftover seeds on the ground? Pets and other animals •Is there any pet food stored outside where bears might get it? □ YES □ NO •Do you have any livestock on your property (chickens, ducks, goats, horses, beehives) that are not protected from bears by an electric fence? □ YES □ NO Fish •Do you have any fishy-smelling gear (nets, lines, coolers) or fish cleaning tables □ YES □ NO outside your home? •Do you keep fish waste outside your home or outside in garbage cans (non bear- resistant)? □ YES □ NO Freezers, Smokers and BBQs •Do you have any freezers outside that might provide easy access to bears? □ YES □ NO •Does your BBQ have leftover food or grease on it? □ YES □ NO •Do you leave your smoker outside unattended? □ YES □ NO Compost •Do you have a compost pile on your property that might attract bears? □ YES □ NO Created by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and the Anchorage Bear Committee Bear Aware Checklist: Solution Sheet What YOU do really matters! Garbage: Secure your garbage so bears can’t get to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2020 to 12/31/2020 Plumas National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2020 to 12/31/2020 Plumas National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Nancy Rusho 228, subpart A. Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 202-731-9196 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 11/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. More Information is available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/science-technology/geology/minerals/locatable-minerals/current-revisions. Plumas National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Plumas National Forest Over- - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:03/2021 08/2021 Katherine Carpenter Snow Vehicle (OSV) Use Objection Period Legal Notice 530-283-7742 Designation 08/21/2019 katherine.carpenter@us EIS Est. FEIS NOA in Federal da.gov *UPDATED* Register 01/2021 Description: Designate over-snow vehicle (OSV) use on National Forest System roads and trails and areas on National Forest System lands as allowed, restricted, or prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • (Native) Bee Basics
    A USDA Forest Service and Pollinator Partnership Publication Bee Basics An Introduction to Our Native Bees By Beatriz Moisset, Ph.D. and Stephen Buchmann, Ph.D. Cover Art: Upper panel: The southeastern blueberry bee Habropoda( laboriosa) visiting blossoms of Rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium virgatum). Lower panel: Female andrenid bees (Andrena cornelli) foraging for nectar on Azalea (Rhododendron canescens). A USDA Forest Service and Pollinator Partnership Publication Bee Basics: An Introduction to Our Native Bees By Beatriz Moisset, Ph.D. and Stephen Buchmann, Ph.D. Illustrations by Steve Buchanan A USDA Forest Service and Pollinator Partnership Publication United States Department of Agriculture Acknowledgments Edited by Larry Stritch, Ph.D. Julie Nelson Teresa Prendusi Laurie Davies Adams Worker honey bees (Apis mellifera) visiting almond blossoms (Prunus dulcis). Introduction Native bees are a hidden treasure. From alpine meadows in the national forests of the Rocky Mountains to the Sonoran Desert in the Coronado National Forest in Arizona and from the boreal forests of the Tongass National Forest in Alaska to the Ocala National Forest in Florida, bees can be found anywhere in North America, where flowers bloom. From forests to farms, from cities to wildlands, there are 4,000 native bee species in the United States, from the tiny Perdita minima to large carpenter bees. Most people do not realize that there were no honey bees in America before European settlers brought hives from Europe. These resourceful animals promptly managed to escape from domestication. As they had done for millennia in Europe and Asia, honey bees formed swarms and set up nests in hollow trees.
    [Show full text]
  • County Commissioner Uses His Surgical Skills in Haiti
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES ■ WASHINGTON, D.C. VOL. 42, NO. 2 ■ February 1, 2010 Dem leaders Social weigh options Web sites for moving catching on health reform in counties legislation BY CHARLIE BAN STAFF WRITER BY PAUL V. B EDDOE ASSOCIATE LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR Communicating directly with individuals is easier than ever with President Obama called on the proliferation of social media Web Congress to pass comprehensive sites, but a NACo survey shows 55 health reform legislation in his fi rst percent of counties don’t make use State of the Union address without of these tools. laying out a specifi c path to achieve Facebook and Twitter, among that end. other Web sites, allow users to release Four options — and variations information directly to the public into thereof — appear to be on the table a community of people who have demonstrated interest by becoming a See HEALTH REFORM page 3 fan of or following a county on those sites, respectively. Rather than relying QuickTakes on a resident to visit a county’s Web site to read news releases, updates Five Large Counties with forward directly to user’s accounts. the Greatest Of 121 respondents, more counties Decrease Photo by Charles Taylor use Twitter (50 users) than Facebook Fairfax County, Va. Emergency Services offi cer Tim Dingess and his dog Lago accompanied Virginia Task (43 users), but many use both. in Weekly Wage Force 1 to Haiti to search for survivors. Lago was previously deployed after an earthquake in Iran. For The majority of counties that more reports on how counties are contributing to the Haitian earthquake relief, see page 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Portraits Book
    HH Beechwood is proud to be The National Cemetery of Canada and a National Historic Site Life Celebrations ♦ Memorial Services ♦ Funerals ♦ Catered Receptions ♦ Cremations ♦ Urn & Casket Burials ♦ Monuments Beechwood operates on a not-for-profit basis and is not publicly funded. It is unique within the Ottawa community. In choosing Beechwood, many people take comfort in knowing that all funds are used for the maintenance, en- hancement and preservation of this National Historic Site. www.beechwoodottawa.ca 2017- v6 Published by Beechwood, Funeral, Cemetery & Cremation Services Ottawa, ON For all information requests please contact Beechwood, Funeral, Cemetery and Cremation Services 280 Beechwood Avenue, Ottawa ON K1L8A6 24 HOUR ASSISTANCE 613-741-9530 • Toll Free 866-990-9530 • FAX 613-741-8584 [email protected] The contents of this book may be used with the written permission of Beechwood, Funeral, Cemetery & Cremation Services www.beechwoodottawa.ca Owned by The Beechwood Cemetery Foundation and operated by The Beechwood Cemetery Company eechwood, established in 1873, is recognized as one of the most beautiful and historic cemeteries in Canada. It is the final resting place for over 75,000 Canadians from all walks of life, including im- portant politicians such as Governor General Ramon Hnatyshyn and Prime Minister Sir Robert Bor- den, Canadian Forces Veterans, War Dead, RCMP members and everyday Canadian heroes: our families and our loved ones. In late 1980s, Beechwood began producing a small booklet containing brief profiles for several dozen of the more significant and well-known individuals buried here. Since then, the cemetery has grown in national significance and importance, first by becoming the home of the National Military Cemetery of the Canadian Forces in 2001, being recognized as a National Historic Site in 2002 and finally by becoming the home of the RCMP National Memorial Cemetery in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Heraldry in Ireland
    Heraldry in Ireland Celebrating 75 years of the Office of the Chief Herald at the NLI Sir John Ainsworth Shield Vert, a chevron between three battle-axes argent Crest A falcon rising proper, beaked, legged and belled gules Motto Surgo et resurgam Did you know? Sir John Ainsworth was the NLI's Surveyor of Records in Private Keeping in the 1940s and 1950s. Roderick More OFerrall Shield Quarterly: 1st, Vert, a lion rampant or (for O Ferrall); 2nd, Vert a lion rampant in chief three estoiles or (for O More); 3rd, Argent, upon a mount vert two lions rampant combatant gules supporting the trunk of an oak tree entwined with a serpent descending proper, (for O Reilly); 4th, Azure, a bend cotised or between six escallops argent (for Cruise) Crest On a ducal coronet or a greyhound springing sable; A dexter hand lying fess-ways proper cuffed or holding a sword in pale hilted of the second pierced through three gory heads of the first Motto Cú re bu; Spes mea Deus Did you know? This four designs on the shield represent four families. Heiress Leticia More of Balyna, county Kildare married Richard Ferrall in 1751. Their grandson Charles Edward More O'Ferrall married Susan O'Reilly in 1849. Susan was the daughter of Dominic O'Reilly of Kildangan Castle, county Kildare who had married heiress Susanna Cruise in 1818. Dublin Stock Exchange Shield Quarterly: 1st, Sable, a tower or; 2nd, Vert, three swords points upwards two and one proper pommelled and hilted or; 3rd, Vert, three anchors erect two and one argent; 4th, Chequy, sable and argent, on a chief argent an escroll proper, inscribed thereon the words Geo.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Projects—Leading The
    Watershed Projects—Leading the Way The past 10 years have seen the completion of numerous watershed assessments and watershed management plans throughout the Sacramento River Basin. However, the true measure of success of any management program comes from the ability to affect conditions on the ground, i.e., implement actions to protect or improve watershed resources and overall watershed condition. This section briefly describes projects from each subregion area that are examples of watershed improvement work being done by locally directed management groups; by local, state, and federal agencies; and by other public and private entities. The examples presented here include projects to benefit water quality, streamflow and aquatic habitat, fish passage, fire and fuels management, habitat for wildlife and waterfowl, eradication of invasive plant species, flood management, and watershed stewardship education. Support for this work has come from a broad spectrum of public and private sources. Sacramento Subregions Northeast Lakeview Eastside OREGON Sacramento Valley CALIFORNIA Westside 5 Goose Feather 97 Lake Yuba, American & Bear 0 20 Miles Featured Projects: Alturas Lassen Creek Stream and Mt Shasta r Meadow Restoration e v i R 299 395 t i Pit River Channel Erosion P r e er iv iv R R o t RCD Cooperative Sagebrush Steppe n e m a r d c u Iniatitive — Butte Creek Project a o r S l 101 C e v c i R Lake M Burney Shasta Bear Creek Meadow Restoration Pit 299 CA NEVA Iron Mountain Mine LIFORNIA Eagle Superfund Cleanup Lake Redding DA Redding Allied Stream Team d Cr. Cottonwoo Lower Clear Creek Floodway Rehabilitation Honey Lake Red Bluff Lake Almanor Cow Creek— Bassett Diversion Fish Passage Project 395 r.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Range of Beaver in the Sierra Nevada: a Review of the Evidence
    Spring 2012 65 California Fish and Game 98(2):65-80; 2012 The historical range of beaver in the Sierra Nevada: a review of the evidence RICHARD B. LANMAN*, HEIDI PERRYMAN, BROCK DOLMAN, AND CHARLES D. JAMES Institute for Historical Ecology, 556 Van Buren Street, Los Altos, CA 94022, USA (RBL) Worth a Dam, 3704 Mt. Diablo Road, Lafayette, CA 94549, USA (HP) OAEC WATER Institute, 15290 Coleman Valley Road, Occidental, CA 95465, USA (BD) Bureau of Indian Affairs, Northwest Region, Branch of Environmental and Cultural Resources Management, Portland, OR 97232, USA (CDJ) *Correspondent: [email protected] The North American beaver (Castor canadensis) has not been considered native to the mid- or high-elevations of the western Sierra Nevada or along its eastern slope, although this mountain range is adjacent to the mammal’s historical range in the Pit, Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers and their tributaries. Current California and Nevada beaver management policies appear to rest on assertions that date from the first half of the twentieth century. This review challenges those long-held assumptions. Novel physical evidence of ancient beaver dams in the north central Sierra (James and Lanman 2012) is here supported by a contemporary and expanded re-evaluation of historical records of occurrence by additional reliable observers, as well as new sources of indirect evidence including newspaper accounts, geographical place names, Native American ethnographic information, and assessments of habitat suitability. Understanding that beaver are native to the Sierra Nevada is important to contemporary management of rapidly expanding beaver populations. These populations were established by translocation, and have been shown to have beneficial effects on fish abundance and diversity in the Sierra Nevada, to stabilize stream incision in montane meadows, and to reduce discharge of nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment loads into fragile water bodies such as Lake Tahoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Plumas National Forest EA EIS CE
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2008 to 06/30/2008 Plumas National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Aerial Application of Fire - Fuels management Completed Actual: 02/18/2008 10/2007 Christopher Wehrli Retardant 10/11/2007 202-205-1332 EA [email protected] Description: The Forest Service proposes to continue the aerial application of fire retardant to fight fires on National Forest System lands. An environmental analysis will be conducted to prepare an Environmental Assessment on the proposed action. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/retardant/index.html Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. Nation Wide. National Forest System Land - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:03/2008 03/2008 Gina Owens Management Planning - Orders FEIS NOA in Federal Register 202-205-1187 Proposed Rule 02/15/2008 [email protected] EIS Description: The Agency proposes to publish a rule at 36 CFR part 219 to finish rulemaking on the land management planning rule issued on January 5, 2005 (2005 rule). The 2005 rule guides development, revision, and amendment of land management plans. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/emc/nfma/2008_planning_rule.html Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - All units of the National Forest System. Agency-wide. Plumas National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Backcountry Discovery Trail - Recreation management Completed Actual: 01/24/2008 08/2008 Peggy Gustafson CE 530-283-7620 [email protected] Description: Designation of Backcountry Discovery Trail (BCDT) on existing roads within the Plumas National Forest to tie together statewide motorized trail Location: UNIT - Plumas National Forest All Units.
    [Show full text]