DOCSLIB.ORG

Lights Creek and Indian Creek Plumas National Forest, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lights Creek and Indian Creek Plumas National Forest, California Moonlight Fire GRAIP Watershed Roads Assessment Lights Creek and Indian Creek Plumas National Forest, California July, 2015 Natalie Cabrera1, Richard Cissel2, Tom Black2, and Charlie Luce3 1Hydrologic Technician 2Hydrologist 3Research Hydrologist U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station 322 E. Front St, Suite 401 Boise, ID 83702 Moonlight Fire GRAIP Watershed Roads Assessment Lights Creek and Indian Creek, Plumas National Forest, California Table of Contents Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Background ........................................................................................................................ 10 2.0 Objectives and Methods .................................................................................................... 12 3.0 Study Area .......................................................................................................................... 15 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................ 26 4.1 Road-Stream Hydrologic Connectivity ........................................................................... 26 4.2 Fine Sediment Production and Delivery ......................................................................... 30 4.3 Downstream Sediment Accumulation ........................................................................... 35 4.4 Landslide Risk ................................................................................................................ 40 Existing Landslides ................................................................................................................ 40 Changes to Landslide Risk Due to Roads .............................................................................. 45 4.5 Gullies and Gully Initiation Risk ...................................................................................... 51 Existing Gullies ...................................................................................................................... 51 Gully Initiation Risk ............................................................................................................... 54 4.6 Stream Crossing Failure Risk .......................................................................................... 58 4.7 Drain Point Condition and Fill Erosion ........................................................................... 62 5.0 Comparison to Other Studies ............................................................................................ 67 6.0 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................. 71 References .................................................................................................................................... 78 Appendix A: Glossary of Selected Terms ...................................................................................... 83 Appendix B: Additional Maps ....................................................................................................... 85 -2- Moonlight Fire GRAIP Watershed Roads Assessment Lights Creek and Indian Creek, Plumas National Forest, California List of Figures Figure 1. Location of watershed inventories and Legacy Roads Monitoring Project ................... 16 Figure 2. Photo showing red oxidized soil with lack of vegetation from severe. ......................... 18 Figure 3. Close up of same area in Figure 2. Note gullying is active in these bare areas. ............ 18 Figure 4. Study area showing Lights Creek and Indian Creek watersheds, major ....................... 19 Figure 5. Geology of the Lights Creek and Indian Creek watersheds. .......................................... 21 Figure 6. Elevation and location of inventoried roads within the Lights Creek and. ................... 24 Figure 7. Land ownership and all roads within the Lights Creek and Indian Creek. .................... 25 Figure 8. Cutslope rills and road surface gullies that increased and expanded ........................... 27 Figure 9. Road segments within 50 feet of stream channels in the east central ......................... 27 Figure 10. There is a higher probability of stream connection at the same drain ....................... 29 Figure 11. Probability of stream connection decreased with increasing drain point. ................. 29 Figure 12. Sediment production and delivery by drain point. ..................................................... 31 Figure 13. Fine sediment delivery to channels by road segment and drain point. ...................... 32 Figure 14. Percent total sediment delivered to streams by percent of drain. ............................. 32 Figure 15. Normalized sediment production and delivery by road surface condition. ............... 34 Figure 16. Sediment accumulation from roads to streams in the Lights Creek Watershed. ....... 38 Figure 17. Specific sediment from roads to streams in the Lights Creek Watershed. ................. 39 Figure 18. Cutslope failure type landslide in earthflow terrain. .................................................. 42 Figure 19. Fillslope failure type landslides in earthflow terrain. .................................................. 42 Figure 20. Locations of observed landslides interacting with the road prism in ......................... 43 Figure 21. GRAIP observed landslides interacting with the road prism within ............................ 44 Figure 22. SINMAP generated calibration graph. Points that lie to the right of the .................... 45 Figure 23. Natural slope stability in the south central portion of the Lights Creek ..................... 46 Figure 24. The most significant slope stability risk changes due to the roads in the................... 47 Figure 25. Changes in slope stability risk in the south central portion of the Lights ................... 48 Figure 26. Areas of naturally high risk and risk changes, south central portion of the ............... 49 Figure 27. Gully below the outlet of a ditch relief culvert............................................................ 52 Figure 28. Locations of observed gullies and ESI risk at drain points, in southeast ..................... 53 Figure 29. Length-slope plot that shows the distribution of gullied and non-gullied .................. 55 Figure 30. Calibration graph from the R local fit calibration. Gully probability is a ..................... 55 Figure 31. SBI values for the stream crossings in the northeastern part of the Lights ................ 58 Figure 32. Distribution of SBI values for the Lights Creek and Indian Creek watersheds. ........... 59 Figure 33. The stream crossings with the highest risk of plugging and the most. ....................... 61 Figure 34. Number of problems by drain point type in the Lights Creek and .............................. 64 Figure 35. Locations of problems by drain point type in the southeast portion. ........................ 65 Figure 36. Problems with ditch relief culverts. The left culvert is rusted through....................... 66 -3- Moonlight Fire GRAIP Watershed Roads Assessment Lights Creek and Indian Creek, Plumas National Forest, California List of Tables Table 1. Summary of effective road lengths by drain point type. Sumps. .................................... 28 Table 2. Summary of sediment production and delivery at drain points. .................................... 31 Table 3. Sediment production and delivery by surface type (top), and normalized ..................... 33 Table 4. Study area streams and sediment accumulation and specific sediment ........................ 37 Table 5. Number and types of observed landslides, as well as masses and ................................. 40 Table 6. Landslide risk changes in the Lights Creek and Indian Creek watersheds ...................... 49 Table 7. Inventoried gullies in the Lights Creek and Indian Creek watersheds ............................ 51 Table 8. Sediment masses produced and delivered by active gullies in the Lights Creek ............ 52 Table 9. Active road surface gullies, production and delivery to streams, Lights Creek .............. 53 Table 10. Distribution of drain points by ESI value, Lights Creek and Indian Creek ..................... 54 Table 11. Further distribution information of drain points by ESI value. ..................................... 56 Table 12 .Maximum contributing road segment length for a given average hillslope ................ 57 Table 13. Drain point condition problems and fill erosion below drain points, Lights Creek ....... 62 Table 14. Fill erosion below drain points, volumes and masses, Lights Creek and Indian ........... 63 -4- Moonlight Fire GRAIP Watershed Roads Assessment Lights Creek and Indian Creek, Plumas National Forest, California Acknowledgments We would like to thank the field crew members Casey Delay, Travis Dickinson, Logan Fusso, Jessica Jamsgard, Jonathan O’Connell, Austin Maphis, Orion Moonie, and Henry Ross for carefully and diligently collecting these data. We would also like to thank the Mt. Hough Ranger District, Plumas National Forest for providing equipment, office space, logistical support, vehicles and bunkhouse space. Thanks to Plumas Fire Engine 22 Captain Tommy Brenzovich
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Water Plan Update 2009. Volume 1, Chapter 2. Imperative To
    Forest Management A Resource Management Strategy of the California Water Plan California Department of Water Resources July 29, 2016 Forest Management Table of Contents Forest Management ...................................................................................................................................................1 Forest Ownership and Management in California ..................................................................................... 1 Effects of Forest Management on Water Supply ....................................................................................... 4 Vegetation Management for Water Supply ........................................................................................... 5 Fuels/Fire Management ......................................................................................................................... 6 Wildfire Impacts on Watershed Resources ....................................................................................... 6 Fuel Treatments to Reduce Wildfire Impacts on Watershed Resources ........................................... 8 Management Strategies to Reduce Adverse Impacts Associated with Wildfire ............................... 9 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 10 Road Management ............................................................................................................................... 10 Riparian Forests ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2020 to 12/31/2020 Plumas National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2020 to 12/31/2020 Plumas National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Nancy Rusho 228, subpart A. Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 202-731-9196 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 11/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. More Information is available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/science-technology/geology/minerals/locatable-minerals/current-revisions. Plumas National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Plumas National Forest Over- - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:03/2021 08/2021 Katherine Carpenter Snow Vehicle (OSV) Use Objection Period Legal Notice 530-283-7742 Designation 08/21/2019 katherine.carpenter@us EIS Est. FEIS NOA in Federal da.gov *UPDATED* Register 01/2021 Description: Designate over-snow vehicle (OSV) use on National Forest System roads and trails and areas on National Forest System lands as allowed, restricted, or prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Dixie Fire Incident Update
    DIXIE FIRE INCIDENT UPDATE Date: 08/07/2021 Time: 7:00 a.m. @CALFIRE_ButteCo @CALFIREButteCo West Zone Information Line: (530) 538-7826 @USFSPlumas @USFSPlumas @LassenNF @LassenNF East Zone Information Line: (530) 289-6735 @LassenNPS @LassenNPS Media Line: (530) 588-0845 Incident Website: www.fire.ca.gov INCIDENT FACTS Incident Start Date: 7/13/2021 Incident Start Time: 5:15 p.m. Incident Type: Vegetation Cause: Under Investigation Incident Location: Feather River Canyon near Cresta Powerhouse CAL FIRE Unit: Butte Unified Command Agencies: CAL FIRE, United States Forest Service Size: 446,723 acres Containment: 21% Expected Full Containment: 8/20/2021 Civilian Injuries/Fatalities: 0 Firefighter Injuries/Fatalities: 0 Structures Destroyed: 184 Structures Damaged: 11 Structures Threatened: 13,871 Other Minor Structures: 84 Other Minor Structures: 9 CURRENT SITUATION Incident Update Dixie Fire West Zone –Fire activity overnight was minimal due to smoke inversion and better overnight relative humidity recovery; however, fuel moisture remains historically low and has caused difficulty in suppressing the fire spread. Fire crews continue to provide structure defense throughout communities, constructing and reinforcing control lines, establishing new lines and improving old control lines. Damage assessment is ongoing. Dixie Fire East Zone –The weather inversion continued overnight bringing cooler temperatures, better relative humidity recovery and calmer winds that significantly reduced fire behavior. Firefighters took advantage of the opportunity to safely engage directly along the fire perimeter. The fire slowed its advance northeast, as it is now burning in more sparse fuels within the 2007 Moonlight Fire scar. Crews finished priority strategic firing operations overnight to keep the fire west of Crescent Mills.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Plumas County Regional Transportation Plan
    2020 Plumas County Regional Transportation Plan Adopted January 27, 2020 Plumas County Transportation Commission 2020 Plumas County Regional Transportation Plan Report Prepared For: Plumas County Transportation Commission 520 Main Street Quincy, CA 95971 Report Prepared By: Table of Contents 0 Executive Summary 1 0.1 Introduction 1 0.2 Overview of Existing Conditions 1 0.3 Overview of Regional Vision 2 0.4 Overview of Action Element 2 0.5 Overview of Financial Element 3 1 Introduction 5 1.1 About the Plumas County Transportation Commission 5 1.2 About the Regional Transportation Plan 5 1.3 RTP Planning Requirements 6 1.4 RTP Planning Process 6 2 Existing Conditions 11 2.1 Setting 11 2.2 Population Trends 12 2.3 Demographics 14 2.4 Socioeconomic Conditions 15 2.5 Housing 19 2.6 Transportation 21 2.7 Streets and Roads 24 2.8 Public Transit 36 2.9 Active Transportation 40 2.10 Aviation 42 2.11 Goods and Freight Movement 42 2.12 Railroads 43 2.13 Interconnectivity Issues 43 3 Policy Element 45 3.1 Transportation Issues 45 3.2 Regional Vision 48 3.3 Regional Goals, Objectives, and Strategies 48 4 Action Element 53 4.1 Project Purpose and Need 53 4.2 Regional Priorities 54 4.3 RTP Project Lists 54 4.4 Program-Level Performance Measures 69 4.5 Transportation Systems Management 73 4.6 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) 73 5 Financial Element 75 5.1 Projected Revenues 75 5.2 Cost Summary 77 5.3 Revenue vs. Cost by Mode 77 i.
    [Show full text]
  • August 10, 2021
    Fueled by winds, Dixie Fire grows by nearly 6,000 acres overnight By Omar Shaikh Rashad San Francisco Chronicle, Tuesday, Aug. 10, 2021 Fanned by gusting winds and low humidity, the Dixie Fire — now the second largest wildfire in California’s history — grew by nearly 6,000 acres overnight Monday. By Tuesday morning, the blaze was reported at 487,764 acres and was 25% contained. The Dixie Fire’s growth Monday was a significant uptick compared to a day earlier, when more favorable conditions prevented the fire’s growth overnight Sunday, according to Cal Fire measurements. Cal Fire reported that thick smoke reduced visibility considerably on the eastern and western sides of the blaze, making firefighting conditions more difficult. The prospect of warming temperatures could aid the fire’s growth in the coming days. So far, the Dixie Fire has destroyed 893 structures and damaged 61 others. More than 16,000 structures remain threatened by the blaze. The fire has no fatalities or injuries among civilians but it has injured three firefighters. Progress made but hot weather could spur California wildfire By Christopher Weber and Jonathan J. Cooper, Associated Press Bakersfield Californian, Tuesday, Aug. 10, 2021 California's largest single wildfire in recorded history kept pushing through forestlands as fire crews tried to protect rural communities from flames that have destroyed hundreds of homes. Thick smoke cleared for several hours along one edge of the Dixie Fire on Monday, allowing aircraft to join nearly 6,000 firefighters in the attack. Many were battling to protect more than a dozen small mountain and rural communities in the northern Sierra Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Sept 2021 Complete Package
    SNC Governing Board Meeting September 2, 2021 This meeting will be held online. Image - Mt. Shasta seen from Ahjumawi Lava Springs State Park Board Meeting Agenda September 2, 2021 — Virtual Board Meeting September 2, 2021 9:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. (End time is approximate) Board Meeting 9:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. (End time is approximate) Pursuant to Executive Order N-8-21 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on June 11, 2021, certain provisions of the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act are suspended due to a State of Emergency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Consistent with this Executive Order, the September 2021 Sierra Nevada Conservancy (SNC) Governing Board Meeting will be conducted virtually through the Zoom Webinar Platform. Members of the public may join the meeting using either of the following steps: Join the webinar Or Dial either of these numbers and enter the conference code to join the meeting by telephone: Dial: USA 636 651 3142 US Toll USA 877 402 9757 US Toll-free Conference code: 347291 Meeting materials are available on the SNC Board Meetings page (https://sierranevada.ca.gov/our-board/board-meetings/). Members of the public can make comments on agenda items during the meeting by using either method of joining the meeting – virtually or telephonically – and by following the moderator’s directions on how to indicate their interest in speaking. Public comment will be taken at the appropriate time during each agenda item and during the Public Comment agenda item at the end of the meeting for non-agenda items.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Fire and Resiliency Summary
    USDA FOREST SERVICE REGION 5 SIERRA CASCADES DIALOG REPORT #11 STILL STANDING – WILDLAND FIRE AND RESILIENCY DIALOG HELD DECEMBER 12, 2013 LIONS GATE HOTEL, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, AND INYO NATIONAL FOREST, BISHOP, CALIFORNIA OVERVIEW On December 12, 2013, the US Forest Service (USFS) held the eleventh program in the series of the Sierra Cascades Dialog: Still Standing – Wildland Fire and Resiliency. The topic was a timely because of the remarkable recent season of wildland fires in the United States, and specifically with the Rim Fire. (The Rim Fire was the third largest fire in California’s history. It began in August 2013 in the Stanislaus National Forest). Through the Dialog stakeholders explored topics to better understand ecological and community needs and impacts of wildland fires, as well as the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). The stated program goals were: Explore the impacts of wildland fire on ecological and community resiliency, and the economic, social, and cultural effects of large fires (such as the Rim Fire). Better understand fire resiliency in a natural setting. Better understand the issues and complexities of surrounding land management and wildland fires. Allow participants to provide input that will contribute to the Forest Plan Revision efforts. Approximately 120 stakeholders participated in the six-hour Dialog in Sacramento and 25 stakeholders participated in Bishop, California. Participants included USFS staff and stakeholders representative of diverse interest groups, including conservation/ environmental groups, fire safe councils, contractors, county governments, forest products industry, land managers, local elected officials, private landowners, recreation, rural communities, scientists, state government, and water agencies. Approximately 15 people identified themselves as attending for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Wildfire Crisis
    Lance Cheung / USDA Lance CALIFORNIA’S WILDFIRE CRISIS: A CALL TO ACTION THE CALL California’s cherished forests are imperiled and our well-being is in jeopardy. The extreme wildfires consuming communities and mountainsides are the catastrophic consequence of a century of inadequate land management, boom-and-bust timber harvests, drought, insects, and climate change. The threat is so massive and growing so rapidly that we must act with urgency and in fundamentally different ways. In addition to the State’s efforts to improve emer- gency preparedness and response, California communities and entrepreneurs need to be fully engaged to implement sustainable forest thinning strategies and put woody material to ecologically sound and economically viable uses. The Governor and state government have a unique and essential responsibility. The Governor needs to WE MEANS US communicate a clear vision for nurturing restoration economies in rural communities, direct state agen- In this report, “we” means all Californians – land cies to expeditiously act, and orchestrate coopera- owners and business owners, entrepreneurs and tion with federal and local partners. environmentalists, scientists and educators, inves- Government agencies at all levels must transform tors and philanthropists, housing advocates, health what they do and how they do it – shifting from a professionals, elected officials, tribal leaders, civil limiting regulatory approach to enabling the pro- servants, artists, communicators, and volunteers. active management required to restore forest and watershed health and increase resiliency to climate change. A critical leading action is the need to hand and me- All Californians must be prepared to do their part, chanically thin, control burn, and reforest at least 1 including providing political support for the financial million acres a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Moonlight Fire Area Restoration Environmental Assessment/FONSI
    United States Department of Agriculture Moonlight Fire Area Restoration Project Final Environmental Assessment Forest Service Plumas National Forest Mt. Hough Ranger District May 2018 For More Information Contact: Daniel Lovato, Forest Supervisor c/o: Christine Handler, Project Leader TEAMS Enterprise Unit Mt. Hough Ranger District 39696 Highway 70 Quincy, California 95971 Phone: 559-920-2188 Email: [email protected] Project specific website: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=49421 Photo Description: Landscape view of Moonlight burned area featuring snags and chaparral understory. Photo taken by Moonlight Interdisciplinary Team, July 2016. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Planning Process
    Appendix A Planning Process A.1 Lists of HMPC Invites/Stakeholders A.1.1. LHMP Invite List Name Agency/Organization Title Email Agencies and Stakeholders Shane Bergmann Almanor Recreation and Vice President [email protected] Park District Carlos Espana Almanor Recreation and Trails Coordinator [email protected] Park District Jim Doohan American Valley CSD General Manager [email protected] Bob Nelson ARES - auxiliary Emergency Coordinator [email protected] communications - KA6NSN - Amateur Radio Bret Russell Beckwourth Fire Chief [email protected] Protection District Jeff Iverson Bucks Lake Fire Chief [email protected] Protection District Kate Beth Kalinosky Burlington Northern [email protected] Santa Fe David Stewart CA Public Utilities Division of Rail Safety [email protected] Commission Naveed Paydar CA Public Utilities Local Government [email protected] Commission Liaison Shane Vargas CAL FIRE Pre-Fire Planning and [email protected] Engineering Scott Packwood CAL FIRE LMU Unit Chief [email protected] Pamela Joe Cal OES Tribal Advisor [email protected] Victoria LaMar-Haas Cal OES Mitigation Planning [email protected] Division Kelly Riley Cal OES Mitigation Planning [email protected] Division Lindsey Stanley Cal OES Inland Region Sierra,Yuba, Sutter [email protected] Operational Area Counties Robert Goyeneche Cal OES Inland Region Siskiyou, Modoc, [email protected] Operational Area Shasta, Trinity Counties Rod Daugherty Cal
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020 SNC Board Meeting Complete Package
    Board Meeting Agenda December 10, 2020 Online/Video Conference Meeting Board Tour and Reception Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the stay-at-home order in Executive Order N-33-20, the Sierra Nevada Conservancy will not be hosting a field tour and there will not be a reception for the December 2020 Board meeting. Board Meeting December 10, 2020 9:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. (End time is approximate) Pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on March 17, 2020, certain provisions of the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act are suspended due to a State of Emergency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Consistent with this Executive Order, the December 2020 Sierra Nevada Conservancy (SNC) Governing Board Meeting will be conducted virtually through the Zoom Webinar Platform. Members of the public may join the meeting using either of the following steps: Join the webinar. Or Dial either of these numbers and enter the Conference Code to join the meeting by telephone: Dial: USA 636 651 3142 USA 877 402 9757 (US Toll Free) Conference Code: 157321 Meeting Materials are available on the SNC Board Meetings page (https://sierranevada.ca.gov/our-board/board-meetings/). Members of the public can make comments on agenda items during the meeting by using either method of joining the meeting – virtually or telephonically – and by following the moderator’s directions on how to indicate their interest in speaking. Public comment will be taken at the appropriate time during each agenda item and during the Public Comment agenda item at the end of the meeting for non-agenda items.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Mitigation Strategy
    Appendix C Mitigation Strategy Plumas County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update HMPC Meetings #4 & 5 - Mitigation Strategy May 19 & 20, 2020 Table of Contents: Agenda Day 1: ➢ Hazard Identification & Profiles…4 ➢ Risk Assessment Methodology…5 ➢ Risk Assessment Summary …6 ➢ Plumas County Priority Hazards…13 ➢ Mitigation Strategy: Goals…14 ➢ Sample Goals from Other Plans…16 ➢ Goals Development…23 Day 2: ➢ Mitigation Strategy: Actions …25 ➢ Categories of Mitigation Measures…25 ➢ Mitigation Measures from Plumas 2014 LHMP…29 ➢ Mitigation Strategy: Action Plan…30 ➢ Mitigation Criteria …30 ➢ Mitigation Action Prioritization Instructions…33 ➢ Mitigation Action Worksheet …34 Jeanine Foster ([email protected]) Foster Morrison Consulting, Ltd. (303) 717-7171 Plumas County Appendix C-1 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update October 2020 AGENDA Plumas County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) Update HMPC Meetings #3 & #4 - Mitigation Strategy May 19 & 20, 2020 HMPC Meeting #3: ➢ Introductions ➢ Status of the DMA Planning Process ➢ Risk Assessment Status ➢ Develop Plan Goals and Objectives ➢ Introduction to Day 2: Mitigation Alternatives/Actions/Projects HMPC Meeting #4: ➢ Introductions ➢ Review Mitigation Selection Criteria ➢ Identify and discuss Mitigation Alternatives/Actions/Projects ➢ Prioritize Mitigation Projects ➢ Review of Schedule/Data Needs Plumas County Appendix C-2 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update October 2020 Mitigation Strategy Meetings May 19 & 20, 2020 Day 1 Plumas County Appendix C-3 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
    [Show full text]