DOCSLIB.ORG

California Water Plan Update 2009. Volume 1, Chapter 2. Imperative To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Water Plan Update 2009. Volume 1, Chapter 2. Imperative To Forest Management A Resource Management Strategy of the California Water Plan California Department of Water Resources July 29, 2016 Forest Management Table of Contents Forest Management ...................................................................................................................................................1 Forest Ownership and Management in California ..................................................................................... 1 Effects of Forest Management on Water Supply ....................................................................................... 4 Vegetation Management for Water Supply ........................................................................................... 5 Fuels/Fire Management ......................................................................................................................... 6 Wildfire Impacts on Watershed Resources ....................................................................................... 6 Fuel Treatments to Reduce Wildfire Impacts on Watershed Resources ........................................... 8 Management Strategies to Reduce Adverse Impacts Associated with Wildfire ............................... 9 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 10 Road Management ............................................................................................................................... 10 Riparian Forests ................................................................................................................................... 11 Meadow Restoration and Groundwater ............................................................................................... 13 Urban Forestry ..................................................................................................................................... 15 Urban Watershed Forestry .............................................................................................................. 15 Tree Cover and Watershed Benefits ................................................................................................ 15 Stormwater Runoff .......................................................................................................................... 15 Structural Soils ................................................................................................................................ 17 Quantifying Benefits ....................................................................................................................... 17 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 17 Forest Loss and Fragmentation ............................................................................................................ 18 Recommendation ............................................................................................................................ 18 Illegal Marijuana Cultivation ............................................................................................................... 18 Climate Change ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Adaptation ........................................................................................................................................... 20 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................................ 20 Potential Costs ......................................................................................................................................... 21 Vegetation Management ...................................................................................................................... 21 Fuels/Fire Management ....................................................................................................................... 21 Road Management ............................................................................................................................... 21 Riparian Forests ................................................................................................................................... 21 Meadow Groundwater Storage ............................................................................................................ 21 Urban Forestry ..................................................................................................................................... 22 Illegal Marijuana Cultivation ............................................................................................................... 22 Major Implementation Issues .................................................................................................................. 22 Information Needs ............................................................................................................................... 22 Coordination Needs ............................................................................................................................. 23 Limited Funding for Forest Watershed Restoration ............................................................................. 23 Regulatory Requirements .................................................................................................................... 24 Overarching Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 25 Monitoring and Research ..................................................................................................................... 25 Coordination ....................................................................................................................................... 25 Regulatory Requirements .................................................................................................................... 26 Beneficial Forest Management in Areas with Commercial-Scale Marijuana Cultivation ................... 26 Special Author’s Note ......................................................................................................................... 27 References ............................................................................................................................................... 27 References Cited ................................................................................................................................. 27 Additional References ......................................................................................................................... 42 July 29, 2016 i Forest Management Tables Table 1 Acres of Forest Land by Ownership in California ........................................................................ 2 Table 2 Watershed Benefits of Urban Forest Cover ............................................................................... 16 ii July 29, 2016 Forest Management Acronyms and Abbreviations AB 32 climate change legislation af acre-foot, acre-feet ARB California Air Resources Board BAER Burned Area Emergency Response BLM U.S. Bureau of Land Management BMP best management practice BOF California State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection Cal EMA California Emergency Management Agency Cal EPA California Environmental Protection Agency CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CO2 carbon dioxide EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FPR Forest Practice Rule GHG greenhouse gas HFI Healthy Forest Initiative LRMP Land and Resource Management Plan NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NFP National Fire Plan NPS National Park Service RWQCB regional water quality control board SWP State Water Project July 29, 2016 iii Forest Management SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board THP timber harvesting plan TMDL total maximum daily load USDA Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service USGS U.S. Geological Survey WDR Waste Discharge Requirements or Waivers of Waste Discharge Requirements iv July 29, 2016 Forest Management Forest Management Forest lands in California, the majority of which are in the middle to high elevation foothills and mountains, produce a diverse array of resources such as water, timber, native vegetation, fish, wildlife, and livestock, and outdoor recreation. However, the water produced by these forests has economic value that equals or exceeds that of any other forest resource (Krieger 2001; California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 2003). Most of California’s major rivers and a substantial portion of its runoff originate in these forests; therefore, most of California’s major water development projects are tied strongly to forested watersheds. Forest management activities can affect water quantity and quality. This strategy focuses on forest management activities, on both public and privately-owned forest lands, whose goals specifically include improvement of the availability and quality of water for downstream users. Water rights for groundwater in most areas of California are assigned to overlying landowners and reasonable use is unregulated. In contrast, surface water rights, which are managed and enforced by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), are a complicated mixture
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dixie Fire Incident Update
    DIXIE FIRE INCIDENT UPDATE Date: 08/07/2021 Time: 7:00 a.m. @CALFIRE_ButteCo @CALFIREButteCo West Zone Information Line: (530) 538-7826 @USFSPlumas @USFSPlumas @LassenNF @LassenNF East Zone Information Line: (530) 289-6735 @LassenNPS @LassenNPS Media Line: (530) 588-0845 Incident Website: www.fire.ca.gov INCIDENT FACTS Incident Start Date: 7/13/2021 Incident Start Time: 5:15 p.m. Incident Type: Vegetation Cause: Under Investigation Incident Location: Feather River Canyon near Cresta Powerhouse CAL FIRE Unit: Butte Unified Command Agencies: CAL FIRE, United States Forest Service Size: 446,723 acres Containment: 21% Expected Full Containment: 8/20/2021 Civilian Injuries/Fatalities: 0 Firefighter Injuries/Fatalities: 0 Structures Destroyed: 184 Structures Damaged: 11 Structures Threatened: 13,871 Other Minor Structures: 84 Other Minor Structures: 9 CURRENT SITUATION Incident Update Dixie Fire West Zone –Fire activity overnight was minimal due to smoke inversion and better overnight relative humidity recovery; however, fuel moisture remains historically low and has caused difficulty in suppressing the fire spread. Fire crews continue to provide structure defense throughout communities, constructing and reinforcing control lines, establishing new lines and improving old control lines. Damage assessment is ongoing. Dixie Fire East Zone –The weather inversion continued overnight bringing cooler temperatures, better relative humidity recovery and calmer winds that significantly reduced fire behavior. Firefighters took advantage of the opportunity to safely engage directly along the fire perimeter. The fire slowed its advance northeast, as it is now burning in more sparse fuels within the 2007 Moonlight Fire scar. Crews finished priority strategic firing operations overnight to keep the fire west of Crescent Mills.
    [Show full text]
  • Lights Creek and Indian Creek Plumas National Forest, California
    Moonlight Fire GRAIP Watershed Roads Assessment Lights Creek and Indian Creek Plumas National Forest, California July, 2015 Natalie Cabrera1, Richard Cissel2, Tom Black2, and Charlie Luce3 1Hydrologic Technician 2Hydrologist 3Research Hydrologist U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station 322 E. Front St, Suite 401 Boise, ID 83702 Moonlight Fire GRAIP Watershed Roads Assessment Lights Creek and Indian Creek, Plumas National Forest, California Table of Contents Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Background ........................................................................................................................ 10 2.0 Objectives and Methods .................................................................................................... 12 3.0 Study Area .......................................................................................................................... 15 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................ 26 4.1 Road-Stream Hydrologic Connectivity ........................................................................... 26 4.2 Fine Sediment Production and Delivery ......................................................................... 30 4.3 Downstream
    [Show full text]
  • August 10, 2021
    Fueled by winds, Dixie Fire grows by nearly 6,000 acres overnight By Omar Shaikh Rashad San Francisco Chronicle, Tuesday, Aug. 10, 2021 Fanned by gusting winds and low humidity, the Dixie Fire — now the second largest wildfire in California’s history — grew by nearly 6,000 acres overnight Monday. By Tuesday morning, the blaze was reported at 487,764 acres and was 25% contained. The Dixie Fire’s growth Monday was a significant uptick compared to a day earlier, when more favorable conditions prevented the fire’s growth overnight Sunday, according to Cal Fire measurements. Cal Fire reported that thick smoke reduced visibility considerably on the eastern and western sides of the blaze, making firefighting conditions more difficult. The prospect of warming temperatures could aid the fire’s growth in the coming days. So far, the Dixie Fire has destroyed 893 structures and damaged 61 others. More than 16,000 structures remain threatened by the blaze. The fire has no fatalities or injuries among civilians but it has injured three firefighters. Progress made but hot weather could spur California wildfire By Christopher Weber and Jonathan J. Cooper, Associated Press Bakersfield Californian, Tuesday, Aug. 10, 2021 California's largest single wildfire in recorded history kept pushing through forestlands as fire crews tried to protect rural communities from flames that have destroyed hundreds of homes. Thick smoke cleared for several hours along one edge of the Dixie Fire on Monday, allowing aircraft to join nearly 6,000 firefighters in the attack. Many were battling to protect more than a dozen small mountain and rural communities in the northern Sierra Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Sept 2021 Complete Package
    SNC Governing Board Meeting September 2, 2021 This meeting will be held online. Image - Mt. Shasta seen from Ahjumawi Lava Springs State Park Board Meeting Agenda September 2, 2021 — Virtual Board Meeting September 2, 2021 9:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. (End time is approximate) Board Meeting 9:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. (End time is approximate) Pursuant to Executive Order N-8-21 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on June 11, 2021, certain provisions of the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act are suspended due to a State of Emergency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Consistent with this Executive Order, the September 2021 Sierra Nevada Conservancy (SNC) Governing Board Meeting will be conducted virtually through the Zoom Webinar Platform. Members of the public may join the meeting using either of the following steps: Join the webinar Or Dial either of these numbers and enter the conference code to join the meeting by telephone: Dial: USA 636 651 3142 US Toll USA 877 402 9757 US Toll-free Conference code: 347291 Meeting materials are available on the SNC Board Meetings page (https://sierranevada.ca.gov/our-board/board-meetings/). Members of the public can make comments on agenda items during the meeting by using either method of joining the meeting – virtually or telephonically – and by following the moderator’s directions on how to indicate their interest in speaking. Public comment will be taken at the appropriate time during each agenda item and during the Public Comment agenda item at the end of the meeting for non-agenda items.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Fire and Resiliency Summary
    USDA FOREST SERVICE REGION 5 SIERRA CASCADES DIALOG REPORT #11 STILL STANDING – WILDLAND FIRE AND RESILIENCY DIALOG HELD DECEMBER 12, 2013 LIONS GATE HOTEL, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, AND INYO NATIONAL FOREST, BISHOP, CALIFORNIA OVERVIEW On December 12, 2013, the US Forest Service (USFS) held the eleventh program in the series of the Sierra Cascades Dialog: Still Standing – Wildland Fire and Resiliency. The topic was a timely because of the remarkable recent season of wildland fires in the United States, and specifically with the Rim Fire. (The Rim Fire was the third largest fire in California’s history. It began in August 2013 in the Stanislaus National Forest). Through the Dialog stakeholders explored topics to better understand ecological and community needs and impacts of wildland fires, as well as the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). The stated program goals were: Explore the impacts of wildland fire on ecological and community resiliency, and the economic, social, and cultural effects of large fires (such as the Rim Fire). Better understand fire resiliency in a natural setting. Better understand the issues and complexities of surrounding land management and wildland fires. Allow participants to provide input that will contribute to the Forest Plan Revision efforts. Approximately 120 stakeholders participated in the six-hour Dialog in Sacramento and 25 stakeholders participated in Bishop, California. Participants included USFS staff and stakeholders representative of diverse interest groups, including conservation/ environmental groups, fire safe councils, contractors, county governments, forest products industry, land managers, local elected officials, private landowners, recreation, rural communities, scientists, state government, and water agencies. Approximately 15 people identified themselves as attending for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Wildfire Crisis
    Lance Cheung / USDA Lance CALIFORNIA’S WILDFIRE CRISIS: A CALL TO ACTION THE CALL California’s cherished forests are imperiled and our well-being is in jeopardy. The extreme wildfires consuming communities and mountainsides are the catastrophic consequence of a century of inadequate land management, boom-and-bust timber harvests, drought, insects, and climate change. The threat is so massive and growing so rapidly that we must act with urgency and in fundamentally different ways. In addition to the State’s efforts to improve emer- gency preparedness and response, California communities and entrepreneurs need to be fully engaged to implement sustainable forest thinning strategies and put woody material to ecologically sound and economically viable uses. The Governor and state government have a unique and essential responsibility. The Governor needs to WE MEANS US communicate a clear vision for nurturing restoration economies in rural communities, direct state agen- In this report, “we” means all Californians – land cies to expeditiously act, and orchestrate coopera- owners and business owners, entrepreneurs and tion with federal and local partners. environmentalists, scientists and educators, inves- Government agencies at all levels must transform tors and philanthropists, housing advocates, health what they do and how they do it – shifting from a professionals, elected officials, tribal leaders, civil limiting regulatory approach to enabling the pro- servants, artists, communicators, and volunteers. active management required to restore forest and watershed health and increase resiliency to climate change. A critical leading action is the need to hand and me- All Californians must be prepared to do their part, chanically thin, control burn, and reforest at least 1 including providing political support for the financial million acres a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Moonlight Fire Area Restoration Environmental Assessment/FONSI
    United States Department of Agriculture Moonlight Fire Area Restoration Project Final Environmental Assessment Forest Service Plumas National Forest Mt. Hough Ranger District May 2018 For More Information Contact: Daniel Lovato, Forest Supervisor c/o: Christine Handler, Project Leader TEAMS Enterprise Unit Mt. Hough Ranger District 39696 Highway 70 Quincy, California 95971 Phone: 559-920-2188 Email: [email protected] Project specific website: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=49421 Photo Description: Landscape view of Moonlight burned area featuring snags and chaparral understory. Photo taken by Moonlight Interdisciplinary Team, July 2016. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Planning Process
    Appendix A Planning Process A.1 Lists of HMPC Invites/Stakeholders A.1.1. LHMP Invite List Name Agency/Organization Title Email Agencies and Stakeholders Shane Bergmann Almanor Recreation and Vice President [email protected] Park District Carlos Espana Almanor Recreation and Trails Coordinator [email protected] Park District Jim Doohan American Valley CSD General Manager [email protected] Bob Nelson ARES - auxiliary Emergency Coordinator [email protected] communications - KA6NSN - Amateur Radio Bret Russell Beckwourth Fire Chief [email protected] Protection District Jeff Iverson Bucks Lake Fire Chief [email protected] Protection District Kate Beth Kalinosky Burlington Northern [email protected] Santa Fe David Stewart CA Public Utilities Division of Rail Safety [email protected] Commission Naveed Paydar CA Public Utilities Local Government [email protected] Commission Liaison Shane Vargas CAL FIRE Pre-Fire Planning and [email protected] Engineering Scott Packwood CAL FIRE LMU Unit Chief [email protected] Pamela Joe Cal OES Tribal Advisor [email protected] Victoria LaMar-Haas Cal OES Mitigation Planning [email protected] Division Kelly Riley Cal OES Mitigation Planning [email protected] Division Lindsey Stanley Cal OES Inland Region Sierra,Yuba, Sutter [email protected] Operational Area Counties Robert Goyeneche Cal OES Inland Region Siskiyou, Modoc, [email protected] Operational Area Shasta, Trinity Counties Rod Daugherty Cal
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020 SNC Board Meeting Complete Package
    Board Meeting Agenda December 10, 2020 Online/Video Conference Meeting Board Tour and Reception Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the stay-at-home order in Executive Order N-33-20, the Sierra Nevada Conservancy will not be hosting a field tour and there will not be a reception for the December 2020 Board meeting. Board Meeting December 10, 2020 9:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. (End time is approximate) Pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on March 17, 2020, certain provisions of the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act are suspended due to a State of Emergency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Consistent with this Executive Order, the December 2020 Sierra Nevada Conservancy (SNC) Governing Board Meeting will be conducted virtually through the Zoom Webinar Platform. Members of the public may join the meeting using either of the following steps: Join the webinar. Or Dial either of these numbers and enter the Conference Code to join the meeting by telephone: Dial: USA 636 651 3142 USA 877 402 9757 (US Toll Free) Conference Code: 157321 Meeting Materials are available on the SNC Board Meetings page (https://sierranevada.ca.gov/our-board/board-meetings/). Members of the public can make comments on agenda items during the meeting by using either method of joining the meeting – virtually or telephonically – and by following the moderator’s directions on how to indicate their interest in speaking. Public comment will be taken at the appropriate time during each agenda item and during the Public Comment agenda item at the end of the meeting for non-agenda items.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Mitigation Strategy
    Appendix C Mitigation Strategy Plumas County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update HMPC Meetings #4 & 5 - Mitigation Strategy May 19 & 20, 2020 Table of Contents: Agenda Day 1: ➢ Hazard Identification & Profiles…4 ➢ Risk Assessment Methodology…5 ➢ Risk Assessment Summary …6 ➢ Plumas County Priority Hazards…13 ➢ Mitigation Strategy: Goals…14 ➢ Sample Goals from Other Plans…16 ➢ Goals Development…23 Day 2: ➢ Mitigation Strategy: Actions …25 ➢ Categories of Mitigation Measures…25 ➢ Mitigation Measures from Plumas 2014 LHMP…29 ➢ Mitigation Strategy: Action Plan…30 ➢ Mitigation Criteria …30 ➢ Mitigation Action Prioritization Instructions…33 ➢ Mitigation Action Worksheet …34 Jeanine Foster ([email protected]) Foster Morrison Consulting, Ltd. (303) 717-7171 Plumas County Appendix C-1 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update October 2020 AGENDA Plumas County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) Update HMPC Meetings #3 & #4 - Mitigation Strategy May 19 & 20, 2020 HMPC Meeting #3: ➢ Introductions ➢ Status of the DMA Planning Process ➢ Risk Assessment Status ➢ Develop Plan Goals and Objectives ➢ Introduction to Day 2: Mitigation Alternatives/Actions/Projects HMPC Meeting #4: ➢ Introductions ➢ Review Mitigation Selection Criteria ➢ Identify and discuss Mitigation Alternatives/Actions/Projects ➢ Prioritize Mitigation Projects ➢ Review of Schedule/Data Needs Plumas County Appendix C-2 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update October 2020 Mitigation Strategy Meetings May 19 & 20, 2020 Day 1 Plumas County Appendix C-3 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Brandon Collins
    Brandon M. Collins UC Berkeley, College of Natural Resources, Center for Fire Research and Outreach [email protected]; http://ucanr.edu/sites/cfro/Brandon_Collins/ OVERVIEW Outreach and service Notable national efforts include serving on the Board of Directors for the Association for Fire Ecology for six years and being an Associate Editor for the Journal of Forestry for the last six years. Regional efforts include: 1) serving on several teams tasked to develop forest management guidelines for reforestation, fire, forest restoration, and California Spotted Owl conservation goals; 2) providing scientific consultation to individual National Forests for project planning; and 3) planning and moderating two regional conferences that brought scientists and land managers together to address forest restoration issues. Conference, workshop, symposia, and field tour presentations: 38 invited and 5 contributed presentations (last 3 years). This includes three invited testimonies to the California State Legislature. National and local media interviews: 39 to newspaper, internet, radio, and television outlets (last 3 years). Performed peer-review for various ecology, forestry, and fire science journals: 26 completed, 52 declined (last 3 years). I taught or was a guest-lecturer for multiple years in five different university courses. Additionally, I served on academic committees for five PhD or M. S. students and mentored seven others through their research. Generated research funding In collaboration with several different university and agency partners I obtained $7.3 million ($1.8MM as Principal Investigator [PI], $5.5MM as co-PI). Published peer-reviewed articles As lead or contributing author, I have written 84 peer-reviewed journal articles and 10 peer-reviewed book chapters or agency-published reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Spatial Patterns of Stand-Replacing Fire in California
    Forest Ecology and Management 406 (2017) 28–36 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Changing spatial patterns of stand-replacing fire in California conifer ☆ MARK forests ⁎ Jens T. Stevensa, , Brandon M. Collinsb, Jay D. Millerc, Malcolm P. Northd,e, Scott L. Stephensa a Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States b Center for Fire Research and Outreach, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States c USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Fire and Aviation Management, McClellan, CA 95652, United States d Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States e USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Davis, CA 95618, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Stand-replacing fire has profound ecological impacts in conifer forests, yet there is continued uncertainty over California how best to describe the scale of stand-replacing effects within individual fires, and how these effects are High-severity changing over time. In forests where regeneration following stand-replacing fire depends on seed dispersal from Mixed-conifer forests surviving trees, the size and shape of stand-replacing patches are critical metrics that are difficult to describe and Patch dynamics often overlooked. We used a novel, recently-developed metric that describes the amount of stand-replacing area Stand-replacing within a given distance of a live-tree patch edge, in order to compare fires that may be otherwise similar in fire Wildland fire size or the percentage of stand-replacing effects. Specifically, we analyzed 477 fires in California pine, fir, and mixed-conifer forests between 1984 and 2015 and asked whether this metric, the stand-replacing decay coef- ficient (SDC), has changed over time, whether it is affected by fire management, and how it responds to extreme weather conditions at the time of the fire.
    [Show full text]