DOCSLIB.ORG

View the Society's Botany Society Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View the Society's Botany Society Inc A usttzalian Svstematic Bottlhlf Societl( NewslettEar No. 104 SEPTEMBEFl 2000 Pric:e : $5.00 ISS N 1034-1218 • AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOT ANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Office Bearers President Vice President Dr B.J. Conn Bill Barker Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney Plant Biodiversity Centre Mrs Macquaries Road Dept for Environment, Heritage & Aboriginal Sydney NSW 2000 Affairs tel: (02) 9231 8131 Hackney Road fax: (02) 9241 2797 Hackney SA 5069 email: [email protected] tel: 08 82229303 Secretary fax: 08 82229353 email: [email protected] Mrs R.M. Barker Plant Biodiversity Centre Treasurer Dept for Environment, Heritage & Aboriginal Affairs Elizabeth Brown Hackney Road Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney Hackney SA 5069 Mrs Macquaries Road Sydney NSW 2000 tel: 08 82229348 email: [email protected] .au fax: 08 82229353 email: [email protected] Councillor Councillor Kristina Lemson Dept of Botany Bob Makinson University of Western Australia Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, Nedlands, WA 6907 CSIRO, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Affiliate Society Papua New Guinea Botanical Society Australian Botanical Liaison Officer Public Officer and Membership Officer Dr R. Chinnock Mr A. Lyne Herbarium Australian National Herbarium Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB GPO Box 1600 England Canberra, ACT 2601 tel: 44-181-3325270 tel: (02) 62465508 fax: 44-181-3325278 fax: (02) 62465249 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] ASBS Web site: http:/ /www.anbg.gov.au/asbs Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 104 (September 2000) ASBS INC BUSINESS Minutes of the 22nd Annual General Meeting of the Australian Systematic Botany Society, Inc. Held on Thursday 9th June, 2000 in Caley Seminar five months of the end of the financial year. Room, National Herbarium of NSW, Royal Botanic Unfortunately, this requirement means that the last Gardens, Sydney. seven AGMs were not constitutional. Therefore, ever since we were incorporated in 1993, the Meeting opened at 6.05 p.m. The President welcomed Society has not held constitutional AGMs. Since we the 13 members present. are a small Society, with members scattered throughout Australia and Overseas, it has proved Apologies very difficult for us to satisfy this legal requirement. Joy Everett, David Morrison, Barbara Wiecek, Murray Henwood, David Mabberley, Kathie There is also a legal requirement for the audited Downs, Bryan Simon, Surrey Jacobs, Elizabeth accounts of the Society to be lodged with the Brown, Kristina Lemson, Alex George. Registrar-General (in the A.C.T.) within 6 months of the end of the financial year. As a consequence of Minutes of the 1999 Annual General Meeting the AGMs being regarded as the deadlines, our It was proposed that the minutes of the 21st Annual failure to submit the audited accounts on time General Meeting (as published in the Australian results in the Society incurring a late-fee. The Systematic Botany Society Newsletter Number 101) penalty is currently set at $200. be accepted. Proposed: Tim Entwisle; seconded: Jenny Hart. Carried. The Society is also non-compliant with the Constitution in the area of categories of membership. Business arising from minutes The Society has created "Institutional" and "Retired There was no business arising from the minutes. and unemployed" member categories but these have not been defined within the Constitution. President's Report Since the current council of Australian Systematic Council has agreed to review the Society's Botany Society Inc. was appointed in December procedures and protocols as defined by the "Name, 1999, this President's report covers less than six Object and Rules of the Australian Systematic months. I would like to acknowledge the Botany Society Inc.", in association with the outstanding work of the last Council and sincerely "Associations Incorporation Act 1991" and other thank each of them for the significant contribution legislation referred to by this Act. It has been agreed that they have made. The current Council members to complete the following actions by the end of look forward to assisting in the growth of the December 2000: Society. Building on the achievements of previous 1. To complete the review of the Constitution Councils will do this. 2. To comply with the Act 3. To develop guidelines for Council and A review of the Society's Constitution has subcommittees appointed by Council highlighted a problem that requires resolution as 4. To present recommendations to the Membership soon as possible. In particular, the Council has recognised that the Society is not meeting its Although the above issues are legally serious, I obligations under its "Name, Object and Rules of the would like to stress that all previous Councils have Australian Systematic Botany Society Inc." (namely, been extremely diligent in applying the spirit of the Constitution) or the "Associations Constitution in all matters. Our aim is to satisfy the Incorporation Act 1991" (namely, the Act). Constitution and the Act while ensuring the future development of the Society. One of the important areas where the Society has failed to meet the requirements of the Constitution and the Act is that we have to hold the AGM within 1 Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 104 (September 2000) Treasurer's Report In view of the increased Newsletter costs the Bill Barker presented the Treasurers Report in Treasurer recommended that subscriptions be Elizabeth's absence. increased to $40 and $20 for regular and student membership respectively. Peter Wilson asked whether we needed to reapply Proposed: Bill Barker. Seconded: Karen Wilson. for tax deductibility. Treasurer to check. Carried unanimously. Karen Wilson pointed out the need to take out GST Treasurer's Report for the 12 Months ended 31 ~ the Eichle: awards and suggested talking to the Lmnean Soc1ety of NSW about this. She also December 1999 intimated that there would be some money donated to the Eichler Research Fund from the Monocot Presented to the Annual General Meeting, Conference proceeds. Sydney, 9th June 2000 Peter.Wilson asked a?out the strategy for managing Introduction the E1chler Fund, which could not be answered in My apologies for not being present to personally the absence of the treasurer. Karen Wilson pointed deliver this report. Unfortunately I was committed out that the Linnean Society of NSW in the face of to a trip to Lord Howe Island long before the date falling numbers and hence subscriptions, took out a for this meeting was decided. Bill Barker agreed to fee from the Research fund for its administration. give the report on my behalf. Peter Jobson asked whether all merchandise had I would like to thank the previous treasurer, John now been written off. This was thought to be the Clarkson, for his magnificent work during his case, but to be checked with John Clarkson. period as treasurer. It is quite obvious, looking at the figures, how the finances of the Society have There seemed to be a mistake in the figures improved whilst in his care. We have experienced concerning the Conifer Books ($20 return in 1999 some difficulties in the handover between seems odd in view of the $60 price tag for this book). treasurers, the most significant being the auditor To be brought to the notice of the Treasurer. retaining all the books for a period of nearly six months (and the bank's inability to change Discussion centred about the increased costs of the addresses despite repeated requests). r:e"':sletter, the figures for 1998 for 4 issues being s1rrular to those of 1999 for only 3 issues and the The finances of this society are run on the calendar 2000 figures for 3 Newsletters already exceeding year so the figures being presented to you are for the those of both 1998 and 1999. year 01 Jan 1999 to 31 Dec 1999. Membership Fee Full Concessional Gratis Total Ordinary 219 (71) 40 (9) 0 259 (80) Student NA 47 (29) 0 47 (29) Institutional 11 (1) NA 15 26 (1) Life NA NA 1 1 Total 230 (72) 87 (38) 16 333 (110) Table 1. Membership of Australian Systematic Botany Society 01 June 2000 (unfinancial members in brackets). 2 Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 104 (September 2000) There has been a small increase in new members for GST. This was done on the basis of advice from (seven, four of them students) and two members have an Australian Tax Office official who stated quite resigned to go to other countries. Approximately clearly that he was not allowed to advise us not to one third of members are still unfinancial half way apply for registration. The gist of his advice was through the year. So late payment remains a that while registration would allow us to reclaim problem, as does the static membership number. the increased costs of postage and printing of the newsletter we would also have to charge GST on General Fund membership fees, student grants, workshops and Income grants to conferences etc. It doesn't take much The amount of interest the Society received in 1999 financial acumen to realise we would paying out was significantly better than in 1998. As people more tax than we were gaining in tax relief. will be well aware, rates have increased over the last 6 months and we can expect further The situation will be kept under review. improvement in 2000. Current Assets in the General Fund The trading statement for 1999 has shown a modest The Society held at the close of 1999 assets of profit as the Society continues to divest itself of it's $37,589 ($36,569 in cash, $1,040 in books). stocks of books and merchandise. Research Fund Expenditure The Research Fund continues to show healthy When looking at the expenditure it should be noted growth.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Orchid Society South Australia
    Journal of the Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc PRINT POST APPROVED VOLUME 25 NO. 11 PP 54366200018 DECEMBER 2001 NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA POST OFFICE BOX 565 UNLEY SOUTH AUSTRALIA 5061 The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through the preservation of natural habitat and through cultivation. Except with the documented official representation from the Management Committee no person is authorised to represent the society on any matter. All native orchids are protected plants in the wild. Their collection without written Government permit is illegal. PRESIDENT: SECRETARY: Bill Dear Cathy Houston Telephone: 82962111 Telephone: 8356 7356 VICE-PRESIDENT David Pettifor Tel. 014095457 COMMITTEE David Hirst Thelma Bridle Bob Bates Malcolm Guy EDITOR: TREASURER Gerry Carne Iris Freeman 118 Hewitt Avenue Toorak Gardens SA 5061 Telephone/Fax 8332 7730 E-mail [email protected] LIFE MEMBERS Mr R. Hargreaves Mr G. Carne Mr L. Nesbitt Mr R. Bates Mr R. Robjohns Mr R Shooter Mr D. Wells Registrar of Judges: Reg Shooter Trading Table: Judy Penney Field Trips & Conservation: Thelma Bridle Tel. 83844174 Tuber Bank Coordinator: Malcolm Guy Tel. 82767350 New Members Coordinator David Pettifor Tel. 0416 095 095 PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian The Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc. while taking all due care, take no responsibility for the loss, destruction or damage to any plants whether at shows, meetings or exhibits. Views or opinions expressed by authors of articles within this Journal do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Management. We condones the reprint of any articles if acknowledgement is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Labiadas (Lamiaceae) De Guinea Ecuatorial
    Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid Vol. 68(2): 199-223 julio-diciembre 2011 ISSN: 0211-1322 doi: 10.3989/ajbm.2288 Las labiadas (Lamiaceae) de Guinea Ecuatorial por R. Morales Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, E-28014 Madrid, España. [email protected] Resumen Abstract Morales, R. 2011. Las labiadas (Lamiaceae) de Guinea Ecuato- Morales, R. 2011. Labiates (Lamiaceae) from Equatorial Guinea. rial. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 68(2): 199-223. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 68(2): 199-223 (in Spanish). Se estudian e identifican 223 colecciones de plantas vasculares The identification of 223 collections of the Lamiaceae family, que corresponden a 14 géneros y 28 especies pertenecientes a from Bioko island, Rio Muni (Equatorial Guinea mainland) and la familia Lamiaceae procedentes de las islas de Bioko, Annobón Annobon, corresponding to 14 genera and 28 species, is pre- y Río Muni (Guinea Ecuatorial continental). Se incluye una clave sented. A key of genera and, in each genus, a key of species are de géneros y en cada género, si ha lugar, clave de especies. Se included. The basionym and type material, a brief description, citan de cada especie su basiónimo y material tipo, se incluyen the known chromosomic numbers, the distribution area and una breve descripción y números cromosomáticos, área de dis- some known popular uses from each species, also included are tribución y usos populares conocidos. Se aportan fotografías photographs of sheets and distribution maps. Some biogeo- de pliegos y mapas de distribución. Se discuten aspectos bio- graphical aspects about the generic and specific distribution in geográficos dentro de la distribución genérica y específica en el the studied area are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Native Plants Society Australia Hakea
    AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANTS SOCIETY AUSTRALIA HAKEA STUDY GROUP NEWSLETTER No. 65 OCTOBER 2017 ISSN0727- 7008 Leader: Paul Kennedy 210 Aireys Street Elliminyt Vic. 3250 E mail [email protected] Tel. 03-52315569 Dear members. We have had a very cold winter and now as spring emerges the cold remains with very wet conditions. Oh how I long for some warm sunshine to brighten our day. However the Hakeas have stood up to the cold weather very well and many have now flowered. Rainfall in August was 30mm but in the first 6 days of September another 56mm was recorded making the soil very moist indeed. The rain kept falling in September with 150mm recorded. Fortunately my drainage work of spoon drains and deeper drains with slotted pipe with blue metal cover on top shed a lot of water straight into the Council drains. Most of the Hakeas like well drained conditions, so building up beds and getting rid of excess water will help in making them survive. The collection here now stands at 162 species out of a possible 169. Seed of some of the remaining species hopefully will arrive here before Christmas so that I can propagate them over summer. Wanderings. Barbara and I spent most of June and July in northern NSW and Queensland to escape the cold conditions down here. I did look around for Hakeas and visited some members’ gardens. Just to the east of Cann River I found Hakea decurrens ssp. physocarpa, Hakea ulicina and Hakea teretifolia ssp. hirsuta all growing on the edge of a swamp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogenetic Perspective
    Astragalus (Fabaceae): A molecular phylogenetic perspective MARTIN F. WOJCIECHOWSKI Wojciechowski, M. E (School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tem- pe, AZ, 85287-4501, U.S.A.; e-mail: [email protected]). Astragalus (Fa- baceae): A molecular phylogenetic perspective. Brittonia 57: 382-396. 2005.-- Nucleotide sequences of the plastid mark gene and nuclear rDNA internal tran- scribed spacer region were sampled from Astragalus L. (Fabaceae), and its closest relatives within tribe Galegeae, to infer phylogenetic relationships and estimate ages of diversification. Consistent with previous studies that emphasized sampling for nrDNA ITS primarily within either New World or Old World species groups, Astragalus, with the exception of a few morphologically distinct species, is strongly supported as monophyletic based on maximum parsimony and Bayesian analyses of matK sequences as well as a combined sequence dataset. The matK data provides better resolution and stronger clade support for relationships among Astragalus and traditionally related genera than nrDNA ITS. Astragalus sensu stricto plus the genus Oxytropis are strongly supported as sister to a clade com- posed of strictly Old World (African, Australasian) genera such as Colutea, Suth- erlandia, Lessertia, Swainsona, and Carrnichaelia, plus several morphologically distinct segregates of Eurasian Astragalus. Ages of these clades and rates of nucleotide substitution estimated from a fossil-constrained, rate-smoothed, Bayes- ian analysis of matK sequences sampled from Hologalegina indicate Astragalus diverged from its sister group, Oxytropis, 12-16 Ma, with divergence of Neo- Astragalus beginning ca. 4.4 Ma. Estimates of absolute rates of nucleotide sub- stitution for Astragalus and sister groups, which range from 8.9 to 10.2 x 10 -~0 substitutions per site per year, are not unusual when compared to those estimated for other, mainly temperate groups of papilionoid legumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Taxa for the Fitzgerald River National Park
    Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park 2013 Damien Rathbone Department of Environment and Conservation, South Coast Region, 120 Albany Hwy, Albany, 6330. USE OF THIS REPORT Information used in this report may be copied or reproduced for study, research or educational purposed, subject to inclusion of acknowledgement of the source. DISCLAIMER The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information used. However, the author and participating bodies take no responsibiliy for how this informrion is used subsequently by other and accepts no liability for a third parties use or reliance upon this report. CITATION Rathbone, DA. (2013) Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park. Unpublished report. Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank many people that provided valable assistance and input into the project. Sarah Barrett, Anita Barnett, Karen Rusten, Deon Utber, Sarah Comer, Charlotte Mueller, Jason Peters, Roger Cunningham, Chris Rathbone, Carol Ebbett and Janet Newell provided assisstance with fieldwork. Carol Wilkins, Rachel Meissner, Juliet Wege, Barbara Rye, Mike Hislop, Cate Tauss, Rob Davis, Greg Keighery, Nathan McQuoid and Marco Rossetto assissted with plant identification. Coralie Hortin, Karin Baker and many other members of the Albany Wildflower society helped with vouchering of plant specimens. 2 Contents Abstract ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downloading Or Purchasing Online At
    On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production OCTOBER 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/149 On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production by Jonathan Lidbetter October 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/149 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-000509 © 2012 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-328-4 ISSN 1440-6845 On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production Publication No. 11/149 Project No. PRJ-000509 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication. This publication is copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Swainsona Murrayana
    Swainsona murrayana VU Taxonomic Authority: Wawra Global Assessment Regional Assessment Region: Global Endemic to region Synonyms Common Names Swainsona morrisian J.M.Black SLENDER DARLING-PEA English (Primary) Swainsona murrayan A.T.Lee MURRAY SWAINSON-PE English SLENDER SWAINSON English Upper Level Taxonomy Kingdom: PLANTAE Phylum: TRACHEOPHYTA Class: MAGNOLIOPSIDA Order: FABALES Family: LEGUMINOSAE Lower Level Taxonomy Rank: Infra- rank name: Plant Hybrid Subpopulation: Authority: General Information Distribution Swainsona murrayana is endemic to Australia, distributed on the western slopes and plains of New South Wales and in equivalent areas of northern and western Victoria and southern Queensland, and with an outlying population in South Australia west of Broken Hill (Thompson 1993). Range Size Elevation Biogeographic Realm Area of Occupancy: Upper limit: 450 Afrotropical Extent of Occurrence: Lower limit: 60 Antarctic Map Status: Depth Australasian Upper limit: Neotropical Lower limit: Oceanian Depth Zones Palearctic Shallow photic Bathyl Hadal Indomalayan Photic Abyssal Nearctic Population Total population size is not known. A recent survey suggests ~100 mature individuals in a population in South Australia population (MSBP 2010). In Victoria there are 28 known populations with a total with a total of 94,000 individuals occupaying 164 hectares (DSE 2003). In New South Wales, this species has been recorded in 23 separate plant communities, 16 of which have been classified as threatened, with most communities having experienced more than 50% decline and 13 communities still experiencing continuing decline (Benson 2006). Total Population Size Minimum Population Size: Maximum Population Size: Habitat and Ecology This herb often grows on heavy soils, especially in depressions associated with chenopod shrubs (Maireana spp.), wallaby-grass (Austrodanthonia spp.), and spear grass (Austrostipa spp.).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Pt 3
    Conservation Science W. Aust. 7 (1) : 153–178 (2008) Flora and Vegetation of the banded iron formations of the Yilgarn Craton: the Weld Range ADRIENNE S MARKEY AND STEVEN J DILLON Science Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, Wildlife Research Centre, PO Box 51, Wanneroo WA 6946. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT A survey of the flora and floristic communities of the Weld Range, in the Murchison region of Western Australia, was undertaken using classification and ordination analysis of quadrat data. A total of 239 taxa (species, subspecies and varieties) and five hybrids of vascular plants were collected and identified from within the survey area. Of these, 229 taxa were native and 10 species were introduced. Eight priority species were located in this survey, six of these being new records for the Weld Range. Although no species endemic to the Weld Range were located in this survey, new populations of three priority listed taxa were identified which represent significant range extensions for these taxa of conservation significance. Eight floristic community types (six types, two of these subdivided into two subtypes each) were identified and described for the Weld Range, with the primary division in the classification separating a dolerite-associated floristic community from those on banded iron formation. Floristic communities occurring on BIF were found to be associated with topographic relief, underlying geology and soil chemistry. There did not appear to be any restricted communities within the landform, but some communities may be geographically restricted to the Weld Range. Because these communities on the Weld Range are so closely associated with topography and substrate, they are vulnerable to impact from mineral exploration and open cast mining.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article As
    Int. J. Curr. Res. Biosci. Plant Biol. (2019) 6(10), 33-46 International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology Volume 6 ● Number 10 (October-2019) ● ISSN: 2349-8080 (Online) Journal homepage: www.ijcrbp.com Original Research Article doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcrbp.2019.610.004 Some new combinations and new names for Flora of India R. Kottaimuthu1*, M. Jothi Basu2 and N. Karmegam3 1Department of Botany, Alagappa University, Karaikudi-630 003, Tamil Nadu, India 2Department of Botany (DDE), Alagappa University, Karaikudi-630 003, Tamil Nadu, India 3Department of Botany, Government Arts College (Autonomous), Salem-636 007, Tamil Nadu, India *Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] Article Info ABSTRACT Date of Acceptance: During the verification of nomenclature in connection with the preparation of 17 August 2019 ‗Supplement to Florae Indicae Enumeratio‘ and ‗Flora of Tamil Nadu‘, the authors came across a number of names that need to be updated in accordance with the Date of Publication: changing generic concepts. Accordingly the required new names and new combinations 06 October 2019 are proposed here for the 50 taxa belonging to 17 families. Keywords Combination novum Indian flora Nomen novum Tamil Nadu Introduction Taxonomic treatment India is the seventh largest country in the world, ACANTHACEAE and is home to 18,948 species of flowering plants (Karthikeyan, 2018), of which 4,303 taxa are Andrographis longipedunculata (Sreem.) endemic (Singh et al., 2015). During the L.H.Cramer ex Gnanasek. & Kottaim., comb. nov. preparation of ‗Supplement to Florae Indicae Enumeratio‘ and ‗Flora of Tamil Nadu‘, we came Basionym: Neesiella longipedunculata Sreem.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Montigena Novae-Zelandiae
    Montigena novae-zelandiae COMMON NAME Scree pea SYNONYMS Swainsona novae-zelandiae Hook.f. var. novae-zelandiae, Swainsona novae-zelandiae var. glabra G.Simpson FAMILY Fabaceae AUTHORITY Montigena novae-zelandiaev (Hook.f.) Heenan FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS Hawkdun Range. Photographer: John Barkla Yes ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Herbs - Dicotyledons other than Composites NVS CODE MONNOV CHROMOSOME NUMBER Close up of Montigena. Photographer: Shannel 2n = 32 Courtney CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | At Risk – Declining | Qualifiers: RF, Sp PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | At Risk – Declining | Qualifiers: RF, Sp 2004 | Gradual Decline DISTRIBUTION South Island, east of Southern Alps. HABITAT Subalpine to low alpine, on fine-grained, partially stable and moist greywacke scree, rock debris and gravel slopes. Sometimes in depleted tussock grasslands. FEATURES Small woody sub-shrub arising from thin, branched stems that extend to the surface from a deeply buried root stock. Foliage a dull green, leafy tufts, 30-70mm long, 10-60mm wide. Leaves divided, 20-35mm long. Leaflets in 6-10 pairs per leaf, usually folded along the mid-rib; fleshy, grey-green or grey-blue and sometimes flushed red. Flowers in bunches, purplish, clover-pink or golden-brown, arising from axils of older leaves. Seed pods swollen, darkening to orange-red at maturity, grey brown when open. Seeds 10 per pod, 3.5mm long, 3mm wide, brown. SIMILAR TAXA None. Large bloated sausage-shaped seed pods, fern-like leaf form. FLOWERING December - February FLOWER COLOURS Red/Pink, Violet/Purple FRUITING January - April PROPAGATION TECHNIQUE Difficult and should not be removed from the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • New Helmet Orchid (Corybas Sp.) Found in the Lower Southwest
    New Helmet Orchid New Helmet Orchid (Corybas sp.) found in the lower Southwest Just when you think there cannot possibly be any more surprises in Western Australian native orchids, along comes some- one to prove you wrong. This happened in early May this year when I received an email from David Edmonds, who lives near Walpole, stating “Had a bit of a surprise today, finding some helmet orchids - it seems very early in the season and they don’t look typical. Wondering whether you had any ideas as to what they could be?” The earliest flowering species of helmet orchid in WA is Corybas recurvus which starts at the end of June but does not reach peak flowering until mid July– August. So, what had David found? Fortunately, he had included some photos and as soon as I viewed them I realised that he had made a significant discov- ery, a brand new helmet orchid for WA. It was mor- phologically unlike any other species found here. Plants had a tiny leaf, smaller than the flower, and the flower, unlike that of Corybas recurvus, stood up- right rather than leaning backwards. Each flower had a broad, cream, pink tinged dorsal sepal and a pinkish -red labellum with a prominent cream boss (the cen- tral part of the labellum). It was also flowering in ear- ly May, several months before Corybas recurvus. Wow, what a discovery! I just had to see it in the wild and arranged to meet David a week later. On the 15th May a small group comprising David Edmonds, Anna de Haan, Jackie Manning (DBCA Conservation Officer from Walpole) and myself met at David’s house and, after a brief chat, proceeded to the location where he had found the or- chid.
    [Show full text]