The Blockade of Leningrad & the Mixed Results of Sovietiza Tion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Blockade of Leningrad & the Mixed Results of Sovietiza Tion The Blockade of Leningrad & the Mixed Results of Sovietization Dane Burrough Abstract: The Siege of Leningrad, a joint German-Finnish religion and criminality violated the basic tenets operation during World War II, lasted for 880 days and t.ook of Soviet society and these accounts were the lives ofa large number ofthe citizens ofthe dty. The dty therefore censored from the records of the was entirely cut offfrom the rest ofthe Soviet Union, causing blockade published after the war. The freezing mass starvation that was far deadlier than the military operations of the siege. Many scholars have argued that the and starving citizens of Leningrad were more Second World War served as the catalyst to fully "Sovietize" concerned with their individual survival and the the populations of the various Soviet Republics. Examining survival of their proud city than they were with primary sources from the siege, this paper explores the the fate of the Stalinist regime; as a result, their extent t.o which that process of Sovietization actually occurred in Leningrad and how the unique experiences ofthe previously patriotic attitudes faded. The blockade imprinted on the dtizens a sense of independence remarkable physical and emotional losses from the greater Soviet state. rendered some Leningraders fiercely Sovietization was the multi-faceted process independent and more proud of their city than by which Soviet central planners endeavored to of the Soviet Union. The Siege of Leningrad was subordinate the whole U.S.S.R. to the power of possibly the most lethal siege in the history of the Communist government and thereby warfare. The siege began in early September transform ordinary citizens into driven 1941 after the Army Group North of the communist ideologues. Many scholars have Wehrmacht or German army moved through the argued that World War II, which Russians Baltic States to join with Finnish forces termed the Great Patriotic War, served as the surrounding Leningrad and cut off the railroad catalyst to fully "Sovietize" the populations of connection between Moscow and Leningrad at the various Soviet Republics. However, this the tiny village of Mga. In doing so, German and Sovietization failed to occur in the city of Finnish forces effectively surrounded the city Leningrad, which suffered a joint and cut off its communication with the rest of German-Finnish siege for 880 days.1 the country. Throughout the siege, the Wehrmacht shelled and bombed the city to During the siege and subsequent blockade smoldering ashes. The Soviet leaders of which lasted from 1941 until 1944, the citizens Leningrad failed both to understand the gravity of Leningrad starved on an unprecedented of the situation and to properly ration for a scale. Estimates of how many citizens died prolonged siege until it was too late to save during the siege vary; the official Soviet figure much of the population from imminent 2 claims a death toll of 632,253, but many starvation. Most of the Soviet deaths due to historians place the number in a range from starvation occurred in the winter of 1941. 3 750,000 to 1,500,000 deaths out of a prewar According to Soviet official figures, likely vastly 4 population of 2,500,000. During the blockade, underreported, 101,583 people, or roughly four citizens resorted to both criminal activity and percent of the Soviet prewar population, died in religious practice as a means of survival. Both January 1942 alone.5 The harslmess of this RICE HISTORICAL REVIEW 7 THE BLOCKADE OF LENINGRAD winter, one of the coldest in memory for many Although the siege diarists, was exacerbated by the German bombardments that had cut off power to the destroyed any sense city in the fall. Though the siege continued of normalcy for the until 1944, the majority of the damage and casualties occurred in the winter of 1941. ''citizens of Leningrad, the During the siege, the citizens of Leningrad survivors held immense pride went to extreme measures to procure food for in their ability to survive and themselves and their families, frequently resorting to crime and the bartering of valuable preserve the spirit of their pre-war goods to obtain bread. The bread itself city. was frequently mixed with sawdust and other fillers because the blockade had created a The citizens of Leningrad met the beginning major grain shortage in the area. People even of the war in the summer of 1941 with a resorted to boiling belts and eating binding mixture of shock and intense patriotism. A glue and other barely edible items to satiate week after the war began Yura Riabinkin, a their hunger. 6 The sight of dead bodies frozen teenage diarist, wrote, "[a]t first I felt a certain in snow or corpses being dragged on children's sense of pride, then a wave of fear-the first sleds became a common sight during the eventually got the upper hand of the second."9 height of the winter of 1941. Inhabitants' Georgi Kniazev, the Director of the Archives of contemporary diaries provide a vivid account the Academy of Sciences, wrote in July, "[t]his of their daily struggle to survive on meager is my city... can it really be true that it is rations of food. In late November 1941 the Red threatened by the danger of an enemy Army, or Soviet ground troops, established an occupation? No, no, no!" 10 Kniazev's Ice Road across Lake Ladoga that served both observation is indicative of the greater as an evacuation route and a way to import sentiment shared amongst the Leningrad supplies into the city. The route however was intelligentsia as well as the Soviet leaders in dangerous and inefficient because the German the Smolny, the communist headquarters in army frequently bombarded it and transport Leningrad. It reflected the lack of preparedness If conditions were often terrible. 7 After the for the imminent siege and blockade. winter, fewer Leningraders died of starvation, Kniazev heard rumors of Germany marching and rations became less restrictive primarily towards Leningrad with the intent to occupy, due to collective gardening in residential areas the policymakers in the Smolny must also have and because there were fewer mouths to feed. had intelligence on the Wehrmacht's The Red Army conducted various offensives movements. However, Andrei Zhdanov, the throughout 1942 to break through the communist boss of Leningrad, and his staff did blockade, but its first successful operation, not believe that the Nazis would ever make it Operation Iskra, did not occur until January to Leningrad. Zhdanov had put responsibility 1943. Even after the Red Army broke the for the defense of Leningrad on his own blockade, constant shelling from the German shoulders in August, 11 mainly in response to forces would continue until the Soviets the political maneuvering occurring in the permanently broke the blockade on January 27, Kremlin in Moscow. Thus, Soviet leaders made 1944.8 multiple mistakes that sparked distrust amongst the Leningraders. One such mistake that proved to be fatal was the creation of the so-called People's Levy. Immediately after the war began, the Soviet 8 SPRING 2016 DANE BURROUGH authorities called for citizens to volunteer for Leningrad in the event of the forced retreat of military service. Officials ordered women and our troops from the Leningrad area." 18 The children to dig fortifications along the Luga public noticed these ultimately unnecessary Line and trained men to fight in battle. These contingency actions and increasingly feared troops, however, were vastly underprepared that the government would surrender the city and ill equipped, resulting in large numbers of to the Nazis. Once the siege began, the casualties among volunteer units. Of the plight Leningraders' attitudes towards Stalin and the of these volunteers, one diarist wrote, "[t]he U.S.S.R. became more apparent. Many entire cream of our Leningrad youth suffered Leningraders, particularly intellectuals and especially, forced to enlist as volunteers and in people whose family members Stalin had civilian battalions, driven to slaughter."12 purged in the 1930s, became hostile towards American journalist and author Harrison E. Stalin and the Soviet Union. One diarist wrote, Salisbury wrote of the volunteer regiments, "[a]s for Stalin, he has been grinding us to a "[the] officers were no more experienced than pulp for the past twenty years. He detests the men." 13 This deadly mix of desperation and Leningrad-no one here has known him or ineptitude did not engender support for the seen him since the Revolution."19 After Stalin Soviet cause from the average Leningrader; adopted the title of Marshal, a diarist instead, it bred resentment among the commented, "[a] man who possesses population once the blockade took its deadly everything in the world ... still needed the title, toll. the simple combination of sounds, the word 'marshal,' an innocent acoustical By September 1941, Leningrad had become a 20 dangerous place; German shelling had become window-dressing!" Another survivor recalled in an interview after the fall of the Soviet a common occurrence as the Wehrmacht began closing in on the blockade ring. At first, the Union, "[n]o one talked about the leaders ... Of course, the people didn't like Zhdanov, because Leningraders failed to understand the gravity 21 of their situation; the diarist Elena Kochina he was a 'fat cat,' the only fat cat we saw." Contrastingly, many historians have noted that wrote, "[a]ll roads to Leningrad are cut off. Is during and immediately following the siege, something about to happen?"14 One diarist more pictures of the Leningrad communist noted that, "Bread rations began to be cut on leader Zhdanov were hung in citizens' houses September 1,"15 while another recalled the bombing raids: "Every time there was a than those of Stalin or Lenin.
Recommended publications
  • ALEXIS PERI Department of History Boston University 226 Bay State Rd
    ALEXIS PERI Department of History Boston University 226 Bay State Rd. Boston, MA 02215 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2019-current Associate Professor of History, Boston University Spring 2020 Visiting Associate Professor of History, University of California, Berkeley 2014-19 Assistant Professor of History, Boston University 2011-14 Assistant Professor of History, Middlebury College 2011 Lecturer, Saint Mary’s College of California ADDITIONAL EMPLOYMENT 2002-04 Administrative Assistant & Interview Auditor, Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley EDUCATION 2011 Ph.D., History, University of California, Berkeley Awarded Distinction 2006 M.A., History, University of California, Berkeley 2002 B.A., History, Psychology, University of California, Berkeley Awarded Highest Achievement in General Scholarship PUBLICATIONS Books: The War Within: Diaries from the Siege of Leningrad. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017. Polish-Language Edition: Leningrad: Dzienniki z obezonego miasta. Siwek Grzegorz, trans. Krakow: Spoleczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak, 2019. Awards: Peri 1 of 14 Winner, Pushkin House Russian Book Prize, 2018 (“supports the best non-fiction writing in English on the Russian-speaking world”) http://www.pushkinhouse.org/2018-winner/ Winner, University of Southern California Book Prize in Literary and Cultural Studies, 2018 (“for an outstanding monograph published on Russia, Eastern Europe or Eurasia in the fields of literary and cultural studies”) https://www.aseees.org/programs/aseees-prizes/usc-book-prize-literary-and-
    [Show full text]
  • Peter the Great and His Changing Identity Emily Frances Pagrabs Wofford College
    Wofford College Digital Commons @ Wofford Student Scholarship 5-2016 Peter the Great and His Changing Identity Emily Frances Pagrabs Wofford College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wofford.edu/studentpubs Part of the European History Commons, and the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Pagrabs, Emily Frances, "Peter the Great and His Changing Identity" (2016). Student Scholarship. Paper 17. http://digitalcommons.wofford.edu/studentpubs/17 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Wofford. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Wofford. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Peter the Great and His Changing Identity Senior History Honors Thesis May 11, 2016 Emiley Pagrabs Pagrabs 1 Introduction Well aware of the perception that foreigners held of him, Peter the Great would never apologize for his nationality or his country. A product of his upbringing, Peter did have some qualities that many foreigners criticized as barbaric and harsh. Said Peter: They say that I am cruel; that is what foreigners think of me, but who are they to judge? They do not know what the situation was at the beginning of my reign, and how many were opposed to my plans, and brought about the failure of projects which would have been of great benefit to my country obliging me to arm myself with great severity; but I have never been cruel…I have always asked for the cooperation of those of my subjects in whom I have perceived intelligence and patriotism, and who, agreeing with my views, were ready to support them.1 Essentially, Peter I was simply a Russian.
    [Show full text]
  • Siege of Leningrad Revisited: Narrative, Image, Self
    SIEGE OF LENINGRAD REVISITED: NARRATIVE, IMAGE, SELF Introduction Polina Barskova The siege of Leningrad, the longest-lasting military blockade in modern history, has never suffered from a dearth of written documentation. As early as September 1941, this tragedy drew the attention of journalists, historians, and poets, both in the USSR and the west. During the war, the most immediate purpose of this coverage was that of propaganda, to en­ courage Leningraders to persevere despite the loss of at least one million lives. After the siege ended in 1944, its narration acquired a somewhat peculiar character: often sensational and only partially informed in the west and euphemistically "neutralized" in the Soviet Union.1 Study of this topic was severely hampered as a consequence of "The Leningrad Affair" (1949-53); after a wave of severe purges, museums and archives dedi­ cated to collecting siege materials were shut down, thus disrupting any attempt at responsible scholarship. For the next four decades, until the time of perestroika, the siege engendered a mighty flow of descriptions. (A full bibliography of Soviet siege texts could easily number in the thousands.) Unfortunately, these accounts typically rehearsed variations on the themes of heroism and sto­ icism, with Blokadnaia kniga, in which the writers Daniil Granin and Ales' Adamovich used victims' and survivors' diary accounts to present a more objective interpretation of conditions during the siege, constituting the major and valuable exception.2 In this book, attention is focused not on the allegorical virtues of the "front-city" but rather on the price Lenin­ graders were forced to pay for their city's endurance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Axis Advances
    wh07_te_ch17_s02_MOD_s.fm Page 568 Monday, March 12, 2007 2:32WH07MOD_se_CH17_s02_s.fm PM Page 568 Monday, January 29, 2007 6:01 PM Step-by-Step German fighter plane SECTION Instruction 2 WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO Objectives Janina’s War Story As you teach this section, keep students “ It was 10:30 in the morning and I was helping my focused on the following objectives to help mother and a servant girl with bags and baskets as them answer the Section Focus Question they set out for the market. Suddenly the high- and master core content. pitch scream of diving planes caused everyone to 2 freeze. Countless explosions shook our house ■ Describe how the Axis powers came to followed by the rat-tat-tat of strafing machine control much of Europe, but failed to guns. We could only stare at each other in horror. conquer Britain. Later reports would confirm that several German Janina Sulkowska in ■ Summarize Germany’s invasion of the the early 1930s Stukas had screamed out of a blue sky and . Soviet Union. dropped several bombs along the main street— and then returned to strafe the market. The carnage ■ Understand the horror of the genocide was terrible. the Nazis committed. —Janina Sulkowska,” Krzemieniec, Poland, ■ Describe the role of the United States September 12, 1939 before and after joining World War II. Focus Question Which regions were attacked and occupied by the Axis powers, and what was life like under their occupation? Prepare to Read The Axis Advances Build Background Knowledge L3 Objectives Diplomacy and compromise had not satisfied the Axis powers’ Remind students that the German attack • Describe how the Axis powers came to control hunger for empire.
    [Show full text]
  • St Petersburg 8
    Plan Your Trip 12 ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd St Petersburg “All you’ve got to do is decide to go and the hardest part is over. So go!” TONY WHEELER, COFOUNDER – LONELY PLANET Regis St Louis, Simon Richmond Contents PlanPlan Your Your Trip Trip page 1 4 Welcome to Top Itineraries ���������������20 Travelling to Moscow ����36 St Petersburg ������������������ 4 If You Like� ����������������������22 Museums St Petersburg’s Month by Month ������������24 & Galleries �������������������37 Top 10 ������������������������������� 6 With Kids ������������������������26 Eating ���������������������������39 What’s New �������������������� 13 Money-Saving Tips �������28 Drinking Need to Know �����������������14 & Nightlife ������������������ 43 Visas �������������������������������29 First Time Entertainment ������������ 46 St Petersburg �����������������16 Tours & Activities �����������31 Shopping ��������������������� 48 Getting Around �������������� 18 Visiting on a Cruise �������34 Explore St Petersburg 50 Historic Heart ����������������54 Vasilyevsky Island ������� 143 Day Trips from Sennaya & Kolomna ���104 Petrograd & St Petersburg ������������ 173 Vyborg Sides ��������������� 154 Smolny & Sleeping ���������������������186 Vosstaniya ��������������������121 Understand St Petersburg 197 St Petersburg History ������������������������� 200 Arts �������������������������������226 Today ���������������������������� 198 Architecture ����������������� 219 Literature ���������������������236 Survival Guide 241 Transport ���������������������242
    [Show full text]
  • The Siege of Leningrad (1941-1944)
    War fronts The siege of Leningrad (1941-1944) François-Xavier NÉRARD ABSTRACT Lasting 900 days between September 1941 and January 1944, the siege of Leningrad claimed the lives of 800,000 of the city’s inhabitants, mainly through cold and hunger. The population of the city was subjected, moreover, to enemy fire and to ruthlessly strict control by the Soviet authorities. The memory of the suffering of Leningrad’s population was first celebrated, then stifled, and is only gradually re-emerging. Tanya Savicheva's Diary The siege of Leningrad by German and Finnish forces (as well as the soldiers of the Division Azul, Spanish volunteers) is a key episode in the Second World War on Soviet territory and saw the reappearance of a form of warfare that was thought to have died out in the nineteenth century. Although less present in narratives of the war in the West, the siege was a major traumatic event for the USSR and Russia. As a symbol of resistance and suffering, it differs from Stalingrad, a heroic victory that could be celebrated more easily. Of Leningrad’s 2.5 million inhabitants on the eve of the conflict, only 600,000 were still alive in the city when it was liberated by the Red Army on 27 January 1944, around one million having been evacuated before and during the siege. It is estimated today that 800,000 people died in the siege, mostly from cold and hunger. Leningrad, along with Moscow and Kiev, was one of the major objectives of the German offensive launched on 21 June 1941, but the city was not taken during the attack.
    [Show full text]
  • From Small Scales to Large Scales –The Gulf of Finland Science Days
    Gulf of Finland Co-operation From small scales to large scales –The Gulf of Finland Science Days 2017 9th-10th October 2017 Estonian Academy of Sciences, Tallinn Photo: Riku Lumiaro Photo: Gulf of Finland Contents Co-operation ORAL PRESENTATIONS V. Andreeva, E. Voyakina* Phytoplankton structure in eastern part of Gulf of Finland A. Antsulevich*, S. Titov Development of the program for combined restoration of European pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) and salmonid fishes local populations in two rivers inflowing to the Gulf of Finland in nature protected areas of Leningrad Oblast. R. Aps*, M. Fetissov, F. Goerlandt, P. Kujala, A. Piel, J. Thomas Systems approach based maritime traffic safety management in the Gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea) J. Kotta*, R. Aps, M. Futter, K. Herkül Assessing the environmental impacts and nutrient removal potential of mussel farms in the northeastern Baltic Sea J. Björkqvist*, O. Vähä-Piikkiö, L. Tuomi, V. Alari A spatially extensive validation of three different wave models in the Helsinki coastal archipelago A. Ivanchenko, D. Burkov* The state and environmental consequences of pollution air pool of the Gulf of Finland transport emissions K. Rubtsova, T. Mironenko, E. Daev* Preliminary assessment of water and sediment pollutions in littoral zone of the Kotlin Island. P. Ekholm*, M. Ollikainen, E. Punttila, S. Puroila, A. Kosenius Reducing agricultural phosphorus load by gypsum: results from the first year after amendment M. Fetissov*, R. Aps, P. Heinla, J. Kinnunen, O. Korneev, L. Lees, R. Varjopuro Ecosystem-based Maritime Spatial Planning – impact on navigational safety from offshore renewable energy developments V. Fleming-Lehtinen*, H. Parner, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Abner 1 Ethan Abner Bridges: Symbols of St. Petersburg St. Petersburg Is
    Abner 1 Ethan Abner Bridges: Symbols of St. Petersburg St. Petersburg is a place where the culture, lifestyle, and architecture are profoundly different from other Russian cities. To the casual observer St. Petersburg looks more European than Russian. The difference is no accident because St. Petersburg was designed that way. Strong European influences intermingled with Russian features are easily observed in the design of the numerous bridges that connect the city’s forty-two islands. The bridges of St. Petersburg are complex. They were constructed to ease everyday travel problems the city’s residents faced. As time passed, however, the bridges arguably became a symbol of the city. In St. Petersburg I had the opportunity to see first hand the cultural and symbolic value of these bridges. Although the city has many bridges, the focus of this paper is on three of the most popular bridges spanning the Neva River—Palace Bridge, Liteinii Bridge, and Trinity Bridge. These bridges illustrate the modern day symbolic and cultural importance attached to them through their use as commercial images, their perception by the city’s residents, and their use in a variety of artistic endeavors. As recognizable symbols of St. Petersburg, the function of these bridges has become much more important than originally intended. St. Petersburg: A Short History Before one can begin to understand what the bridges represent in St. Petersburg society and culture today, one must examine the city’s history. How and why did the city emerge and what effects did this have on the construction and Abner 2 eventual importance of these structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4, Issue 3
    ENERPO Journal Volume 4 June 2016 Issue 3 ENERPO Journal management Irina Mironova Editor-in-Chief ([email protected]) Zachary Waller Assistant Editor ([email protected]) Jerry Byers Associate Editor, Online Editor ([email protected]) Aaron Wood Technical Editor ([email protected]) Nikita Lomagin Academic Director, ENERPO Program ([email protected]) Yulia Vymyatnina Professor, Department of Economics, EUSP ([email protected]) Maurizio Recordati Executive Director, ENERPO Research Center ([email protected]) Michael Camarda Associate Director, ENERPO Program ([email protected]) Nicholas Watt ENERPO Journal Co-Founder ([email protected]) Editorial council John Francis Collins ENERPO student Pierre Jouvellier ENERPO student Lina Strandvaag Nagell ENERPO student Patrick Osborne ENERPO/MARCA student Glenda Pavon-Suriel ENERPO student Bogdan Polishchuk ENERPO student Michael Roh ENERPO student Soojeong Shin ENERPO student Henrik Vorloeper ENERPO student Contents China's Possible Accession to the ECT: Benefits and Obstacles 03 Lina Nagell ANALYSIS This paper addresses two main questions. The first asks what the benefits to China are in joining the ECT, the second whether the One Belt, One Road initiative will accelerate the country’s accession to the treaty. The paper finds that the main benefits facing Chinese accession to the ECT are: (1) the increased protection of Chinese foreign investments, (2) the improvement of investor confidence in the Chinese energy market, and (3) the boost of Chinese influence in global energy governance. The main obstacles are: (1) fear of international arbitration cases against the Chinese government and (2) the scarcity of political support and geographically asymmetrical protection coverage for China.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study of St. Petersburg)
    E3S Web of Conferences 164, 04002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf /202016404002 TPACEE-2019 Space-planning development of high-rise dominating structures in the historical center (case study of St. Petersburg) Milena Zolotareva 1* 1 Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Vtoraya Krasnoarmeyskaya St. 4, St. Petersburg, 190005, Russia, Abstract. The article addresses the evolution of layout and spatial design development regarding high-rise zoning in the central part of St. Petersburg. The skyline has always played an important role in the spatial composition of St. Petersburg. Study objective of the study is to analyze the evolution of the spatial and spatial structure and high-altitude zoning in the historical part of St. Petersburg in the end of the 19th – beginning of the 20th century. A study of the sustainable development of the historical urban environment is of undoubted interest from the point of view of identifying promising approaches to the implementation of planning, architectural and construction measures for for modern construction in the historical city. The study is based on cartographic, literary end field methods. St. Petersburg is a unity of space-planning structures that were shaped during the 18th–19th centuries. Moreover, every subsequent urban- planning concept of city development acted both to develop the city and to connect the concepts to each other. Therefore, regularities in the development of the system of high-rise dominating structures in St. Petersburg shall be analyzed with account for the historical stages of the layout shaping of its urban environment. Analysis of examples of new construction at the beginning of the 19th – beginning of the 20th century in the center of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Activities of Russian Organization in Relation to the BALTEX Phase II Implementation 1
    Report on the activities of Russian organization in relation to the BALTEX Phase II Implementation 1. Better understanding of the energy and water cycles over the Baltic Sea basin Long-term studies of lakes and rivers ice regime formation in the Russian part of the Baltic Sea basin are being carried out at the State Hydrological Institute. The changes of ice cover duration and maximal ice cover thickness for the last 50 years has been estimated on the basis of statistical methods. The ice cover duration in mid-size rivers within the Russian part of Baltic drainage basin became shorter because of later ice-on and earlier ice-off: - for the period of observation (from 1945 to 2005) became shorter by 30-40 days on the average - during the last 20-25 years became shorter by 3-7 days on the average Volkhov-Volkhov, 1946-2005 R2 = 0,3588 200 150 100 50 0 Ice cover duration, days 1946 1951 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 Years In all rivers under consideration within the Russian part of Baltic drainage basin a tendency towards decrease of the maximum ice cover thickness was established for the second part of the XXth century. A thinning of the maximum ice cover thickness was -5-10 cm for the period Luga-Kingisep, 1954-2000 R2 = 0,0252 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 ice cover thickness, cm 30 um 20 Shelon-Zapolie, 1945-2005 10 axim M 0 100 4 8 2 6 0 4 8 2 6 0 4 5 5 6 6 97 97 97 98 98 99 99 998 002 80 19 19 19 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Years 60 R2 = 0,0052 40 thickness, cm 20 Maximum ice cover 0 1954 1958 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 Years Possible features of bottom flow from the Stolp Channel into the Central Baltic were investigated by numerical simulation at the Russian State Hydrometeorological University (RSHU).
    [Show full text]
  • Early Axis Gains - Blitzkrieg - German for "Lightning War" - 3 Stages: 1
    March 10, 2008 THE GLOBAL CONFLICT: AXIS ADVANCES - Early Axis Gains - blitzkrieg - German for "lightning war" - 3 stages: 1. German bombers 2. tanks 3. infantry - within one month, Poland fell to Germany + USSR - Baltic states - Stalin's armies took over Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and part of Finland The "Phony War" - Britain, France waited behind the Maginot Line - no attack occurred - April 1940 - Norway + Denmark fell - April/May 1940 - Netherlands + Belgium fell Miracle at Dunkirk - May 1940 - Allied forces were trapped in France between Germans and the English Channel - 100s of British ships/boats came to rescue 300,000 troops across the Channel - this heroic rescue greatly raised British morale France Falls - Germany attacked from the north, Italy from the south - June 22, 1940 - Hitler forced from to surrender - Germany occupied the north, southern France became Vichy France (a puppet state that collaborated with the Nazis) Africa and the Balkans - Sept. 1940 - Italy attempted, failed to invade Egypt (British colony) - Germans sent in General Erwin Rommel (the "Desert Fox") - pushed the British back to Cairo, Egypt - British worried Germans would capture the Suez Canal - Oct. 1940 - Italian forces invaded Greece - 1941 - German forces provided provided reinforcements again - Greece + Yugoslavia added to Axis empire - Bulgaria and Hungary joined the Axis alliance The Battle of Britain and the Blitz - Aug. 12, 1940 - German bombers attacked England's southern coast - Royal Air Force (RAF) battled the German air force (Luftwaffe)
    [Show full text]