US Presidential Election Maths

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

US Presidential Election Maths INFOCUS MARKET SNAPSHOT JUNE 2020 US Presidential election maths DISCIPLINED BY NATURE. FLEXIBLE BY DESIGN. HIGHLIGHTED IN THIS PUBLICATION: The icons alongside represent our investment process. Through a disciplined provision of investment policy and security selection at GLOBAL STRATEGIC GLOBAL SECURITY ASSET ALLOCATION SELECTION the global level, regional portfolio management teams have the flexiblility to construct portfolios to meet the specific requirements REGIONAL REGIONAL PORTFOLIO of our clients. ASSET ALLOCATION CONSTRUCTION US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MATHS Investor attention over the past few months has, with good reason, been focused on all things related to the Covid-19 pandemic. Understanding the current impact and future consequences of the virus has been of paramount importance. Now that we appear to be over the worst of the crisis in most developed economies, investors are starting to think about other issues such as the impending US presidential election. In this Infocus report Daniel Murray examines the prospects for the two main parties. 2016 revisited Democrat voters appear to have been put off more by Hillary 2016 was a year full of surprises: Donald Trump was not Clinton than potential Republican voters were put off by expected to win the Republican Party nomination, nor was Donald Trump. This is supported by the observation that the he expected to win the race for the White House once the Republican share of the popular vote decreased by about 1% nomination was secured. That he did so was even more between 2012 and 2016 whereas the Democrat share of the surprising given that he won only 46% of the popular vote vote fell by about 3%.1 compared to 48% won by Democrat Party candidate Hillary Clinton. The last time a US president was elected having lost There are six states for which polling has traditionally the popular share of the vote by a larger margin was in 1876. been close between the two main parties. These so-called swing states are: Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Much has been written about the 2016 election and its unusual Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Hillary Clinton only had to win result and no doubt many factors were at play. Two of the most a couple of these whilst retaining the safe Democrat states important seem to be: to win overall in 2016 but, of these six states, she did not win any. The loss must have been even more painful given that ➡ The relatively high proportion of votes cast for the margin of defeat was only 1% of the vote in four of these neither of the two main parties six states. ➡ The success of Donald Trump in the swing states 2020 forecast The peculiarities of the 2016 vote highlight how challenging 1. Independent share of the vote in US presidential elections it can be to forecast election results. This year will be even more uncertain given the uniqueness of the situation 12 associated with the coronavirus. Whilst there has been 10 a sharp contraction in economic activity in the US there has also been a gargantuan amount of monetary and 8 fiscal stimulus applied, dwarfing even that which followed % 6 the Global Financial Crisis of 2008/09. Furthermore, the Trump administration has become more bellicose in its 4 communications about China in a thinly veiled attempt to 2 appeal to anti-China sentiment that has grown significantly in recent years across the US political spectrum.2 0 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 Independent share of the popular vote Despite the coronavirus, its seismic impact on economic Source: The American Presidency project at UC Santa Barbara, EFG calculations. Data as at 16 June 2020. activity and the perception by some that the US administration could have handled the situation better, Donald Trump’s The share of the vote that went to independent candidates popularity rating has remained remarkably resilient this in 2016 was the highest since 1996. Moreover, potential year although it has declined a little recently (see Figure 2). 1 US presidential elections are unusual to the extent that they are dominated by only two parties. Whereas the electoral systems of many other countries include multiple parties capable of influencing the result, in the US the two main parties have in effect had a duopoly for at least 100 years. This means that independent candidates are often from fringe parties and therefore lack the resources and credibility to attract a meaningful number of votes. The last independent candidate to make a significant mark on the US presidential election was Ross Perot who stood in both 1992 and 1996, attracting 18.9% and 8.4% of the vote respectively. However, he failed to win any electoral college votes. In the 2016 election Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson won 3.3% of the vote and Green party candidate Jill Stein won 1.1%. 2 See recent Macro Flash Note from 3 June 2020, “China-US relations: it’s complicated”. 2 | June 2020 US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MATHS 2. Trump’s popularity rating (7-day moving average) The analysis also controls for whether or not the incumbent President is running for a second term, the number of 56 consecutive terms for which the incumbent party has been in 54 power and for war years. 52 50 3. US presidential elections: Democrat share of the vote, % 48 actual and predicted 46 70 44 65 42 60 40 55 Jan Feb Mar AprMay Jun 2020 Approve Disapprove % 50 Source: fivethirtyeight.com, EFG calculations. Data as at 16 June 2020. 45 40 Aggregating polling data taken from fivethirtyeight.com across 35 47 different pollsters shows that Trump’s approval rating 30 stayed in a range of between about 42 and 44 until late March. 1916 1928 1940 1952 1964 1976 1988 2000 2012 2020 It then briefly rose before settling at around 44 where it stayed Democrat share of two-party popular vote Forecast Democrat share of vote until the end of May. It has declined since then to levels similar Source: Ray Fair, The American Presidency project at UC Santa Barbara, EFG calculations. Data as at 16 June 2020. to those seen in the early part of the year. It is possible that the coronavirus and its associated impact It is hard to say for certain what all these cross currents mean will cause this model to break down for the 2020 election. for November’s election but it is possible to use econometric However, as we don’t know how the model will be affected, techniques to help form an objective statistical view of how it seems reasonable to use its output as a starting point. It to gauge each candidate’s chances. A well-known academic is also worth noting that all elections have unique features paper from 19783 tested a variety of different inputs to see associated with them, despite which the statistical model has how well they predicted the Democrat share of the vote in performed well historically. presidential elections. The results show that it is possible to predict the outcome of presidential elections using a small Taking actual Q1 2020 data and using consensus forecasts number of economic variables. While other factors are of for the second and third quarters produces an annualised course important, the findings suggest that economic factors growth rate in real GDP per capita of around -10.5% for the first are meaningful determinants in explaining election results. three quarters of the year. Using actual data where it exists and consensus forecasts for the second and third quarters The same author has updated the analysis for every election allows us to produce input values for the other two variables. since then. The latest analysis – incorporating the 2016 election Plugging these variables into the equation produces a forecast result – suggests that the economic backdrop can be captured for the Democrat share of the vote of 53%. Plugging in numbers by only three variables: as they were at the beginning of the year, including growth and inflation estimates for 2020 at that time, would have 1. The per capita GDP growth rate in the first three quarters produced an estimated Democrat share of the vote of 46%. of the election year (a higher value reduces the predicted The major difference between the beginning of the year and Democrat share of the vote) now is that growth estimates for 2020 have been revised significantly lower. 2. The average inflation rate over the first 15 quarters of an administration (a higher value increases the predicted The model assumes that there are only two parties so that Democrat share of the vote) the forecast Republican share of the vote is simply 1 minus the Democrat share. In this instance that would be 47% for 3. The number of quarters during an administration in 2020, one percentage point more than Trump received in 2016. which the growth rate of real GDP per capita exceeds However, we need to adjust the 2016 result to take into account 3.2% (a higher value reduces the predicted Democrat the high proportion of independent votes: of the votes cast share of the vote) only for Clinton and Trump, Clinton won 51% and Trump 49%. 3 Fair, Ray C., ”The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1978, 60, 159-173 June 2020 | 3 US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MATHS For reference the model anticipated that the Democrats would Conclusions win 44% of the vote in 2016 and the Republicans 56%. This is Predicting the outcome of this year’s presidential election interesting because (a) it was quite inaccurate in terms of the is even more challenging than normal given uncertainties actual share achieved – which illustrates the importance of associated with the coronavirus pandemic.
Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Talk Shows Between Obama and Trump Administrations by Jack Norcross — 69
    Analysis of Talk Shows Between Obama and Trump Administrations by Jack Norcross — 69 An Analysis of the Political Affiliations and Professions of Sunday Talk Show Guests Between the Obama and Trump Administrations Jack Norcross Journalism Elon University Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in an undergraduate senior capstone course in communications Abstract The Sunday morning talk shows have long been a platform for high-quality journalism and analysis of the week’s top political headlines. This research will compare guests between the first two years of Barack Obama’s presidency and the first two years of Donald Trump’s presidency. A quantitative content analysis of television transcripts was used to identify changes in both the political affiliations and profession of the guests who appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” CBS’s “Face the Nation,” ABC’s “This Week” and “Fox News Sunday” between the two administrations. Findings indicated that the dominant political viewpoint of guests differed by show during the Obama administration, while all shows hosted more Republicans than Democrats during the Trump administration. Furthermore, U.S. Senators and TV/Radio journalists were cumulatively the most frequent guests on the programs. I. Introduction Sunday morning political talk shows have been around since 1947, when NBC’s “Meet the Press” brought on politicians and newsmakers to be questioned by members of the press. The show’s format would evolve over the next 70 years, and give rise to fellow Sunday morning competitors including ABC’s “This Week,” CBS’s “Face the Nation” and “Fox News Sunday.” Since the mid-twentieth century, the overall media landscape significantly changed with the rise of cable news, social media and the consumption of online content.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminine Style in the Pursuit of Political Power
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Talk “Like a Man”: Feminine Style in the Pursuit of Political Power DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Political Science by Jennifer J. Jones Dissertation Committee: Professor Kristen Monroe, Chair Professor Marty Wattenberg Professor Michael Tesler 2017 Chapter 4 c 2016 American Political Science Association and Cambridge University Press. Reprinted with permission. All other materials c 2017 Jennifer J. Jones TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii CURRICULUM VITAE viii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION xi 1 Introduction 1 2 Theoretical Framework and Literature Review 5 2.1 Social Identity and Its Effect on Social Cognition . 6 2.1.1 Stereotypes and Expectations . 9 2.1.2 Conceptualizing Gender in US Politics . 13 2.2 Gender and Self-Presentation in US Politics . 16 2.2.1 Masculine Norms of Interaction in Institutional Settings . 16 2.2.2 Political Stereotypes and Leadership Prototypes . 18 2.3 The Impact of Political Communication in Electoral Politics . 22 2.4 Do Women Have to Talk Like Men to Be Considered Viable Leaders? . 27 3 Methods: Words are Data 29 3.1 Approaches to Studying Language . 30 3.2 Analyzing Linguistic Style . 34 3.2.1 Gendered Communication and the Feminine/Masculine Ratio . 37 3.2.2 Comparison with Other Coding Schemes . 39 3.3 Approaches to Studying Social Perception and Attitudes . 40 3.3.1 The Link Between Linguistic Style and Implicit Associations . 42 4 The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013 45 4.1 The Case of Hillary Clinton .
    [Show full text]
  • Dixie Succumbs to Vision and Victory
    sfltimes.com “Elevating the Dialogue” SERVING MIAMI-DADE, BROWARD, PALM BEACH AND MONROE COUNTIES FEBRUARY 5 — 11, 2015 | 50¢ IN THIS ISSUE PALM BEACH Dixie succumbs to vision By DAPHNE TAYLOR Special to South Florida Times Nearly every city in America and victory has a street named for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. And since Presi- dent Barack Obama made history BLACK HISTORY as the first black president of the SPECIAL SECTION/1D free world, he too, is gaining mo- mentum with streets named after Keeping our History him -- even right here in the Sun- Alive 365/24/7 shine State. But predominantly the idea about black Riviera Beach in Palm Beach a year ago. “I’ve al- County, is hoping to be among the ways had an idea to rename a lot of first where Barack Obama High- streets in our city. I think our city is way intersects with Dr. Martin Lu- much more than just a bunch of let- ther King Jr. Blvd. ters of the alphabet and numbers. It has an amazing ring to it I’ve wanted to rename our streets for Riviera Beach mayor, Bishop after African-American role mod- Thomas Masters, who is the brain els and leaders, so I had this idea behind renaming Old Dixie High- about the president for some way in Riviera Beach after the time now. It would be the right president. “It would be the father thing to do today and would and the son intersecting,” said reconnect this great city to Masters. “You have the father of history.” the Civil Rights Movement, and Masters said some crit- SOFLO LIVE you have the son, our first black ics said he should wait un- TARAJI HENSON/4C president, who benefitted from til after the leaders have that movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Www. George Wbush.Com
    Post Office Box 10648 Arlington, VA 2221 0 Phone. 703-647-2700 Fax: 703-647-2993 www. George WBush.com October 27,2004 , . a VIA FACSIMILE (202-219-3923) AND CERTIFIED MAIL == c3 F Federal Election Commission 999 E Street NW Washington, DC 20463 b ATTN: Office of General Counsel e r\, Re: MUR3525 Dear Federal Election Commission: On behalf of President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard B. Cheney as candidates for federal office, Karl Rove, David Herndon and Bush-Cheney ’04, Inc., this letter responds to the allegations contained in the complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission (the “Commission”) by Kerry-Edwards 2004, Inc. The Kerry Campaign’s complaint alleges that Bush-Cheney 2004 and fourteen other individuals and organizations violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 197 1, as amended (2 U.S.C. $ 431 et seq.) (“the Act”). Specifically, the Kerry Campaign alleges that individuals and organizations named in the complaint illegally coordinated with one another to produce and air advertising about Senator. Kerry’s military service. 1 Considering that no entity by the name of Bush-Cheney 2004 appears to exist, 1’ Bush-Cheney ’04, Inc. (“Bush Campaign”) presumes that the Kerry Campaign mistakenly filed its complaint against a non-existent entity and actually intended to file against the Bush Campaign. Assuming that the foregoing presumption is correct; the Bush Campaign, on behalf of itself and President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Karl Rove, David Herndon (the “Parties”), responds as follows: Response to Allegations Against President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping out the Trump Era
    Mapping Out the Trump Era Drew Angerer/Getty Images Mapping Out the Trump Era Researcher’s Note: In the wake of the election of Donald Trump as the next United States president, the media has been saturated with noise about what it all means. In this report, which adds to our coverage of the issue, we show that media bloviation aside, geopolitics trumps politics. The Trump Presidency and Geopolitical Realities 3 Considering Populism in the Wake of Brexit and Trump 7 The Role of Populism and the Media in Trump’s Election 12 Looking at the Map to Understand the World After Election Day 15 Understanding America’s Global Role in the Age of Trump 18 Manufacturing: A Campaign Promise That Cannot Be Kept 22 The Trump Doctrine: A Work in Progress 25 Taiwan, Trump and a Telephone 30 This report cannot be shared or copied without express permission from Stratfor. ANTON BALAZH/Shutterstock The Trump Presidency and Geopolitical Realities We hear all the time about how the world “should” won’t bury you in academic pretension or require a work. Self-proclaimed liberals and conservatives, fancy algorithm to model. But its simplicity doesn’t Keynesians and Reaganites, humanists and hawks, make it any less powerful. When you boil down the globalists and nationalists have crammed the air- frothy mixture of ideas, personalities and emotions waves and filled our Twitter feeds with policy pre- that have bubbled up over the past year, what is scriptions, promoting their worldview while scorning left are some fairly obvious answers on how we others’.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Report
    Project for Excellence in Journalism Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life December 14, 2012 The Media, Religion and the 2012 Campaign for President FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Alan Cooperman, Associate Director, Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life Amy Mitchell, Acting Director, Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism Jesse Holcomb, Research Associate, Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism (202) 419-4300 1615 L St. N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 www.journalism.org The Media, Religion and the 2012 Campaign for President Overview A striking feature of the 2012 race for the White House – a contest that pitted the first Mormon nominee from a major party against an incumbent president whose faith had been a source of controversy four years earlier – is how little the subject of religion came up in the media. According to a new study by the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism and the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, just 1% of the campaign coverage by major news outlets (including broadcast and cable television, radio, newspaper front pages and the most popular news websites) focused on the religion of the candidates or the role of religion in the presidential election. Only 6% of the election- related stories in major news outlets contained any reference to religion. Media attention to religion’s importance in the campaign peaked during the primaries, when several Republican candidates spoke about their Christian beliefs. The prominence of religious rhetoric in speeches by Rep. Michele Bachmann, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Reaching Executive Office: the Presidency and the Office of the Governor
    Reaching Executive Office: The Presidency and the Office of the Governor The presidency—the highest “glass ceiling” in Ameri- less appropriate for the job because voters hold gender can politics—has yet to be shattered by a woman. An- stereotypes about politician issue competency in these other major elective executive office—the office of the areas.7 Potential female presidential candidates are governor—has been within women’s reach. But in 2015, less likely to have a background of military service— only six of the nation’s fifty governors are women, al- a credential also associated with the presidency.8 most 100 years after the very first woman served as governor.1 A net gain of five women over the course The United States lags behind many other countries of nearly 100 years is slow progress by any standard. in its failure to elect a female president. Currently 22 Almost half of states have yet to experience a woman countries are led by a female president or prime 9 governor.2 minister. In a provocative argument, Eileen McDonagh argues that countries with female monarchs are more What challenges do women face in seeking the presi- accustomed to women’s leadership.10 She suggests that dency and the governor’s office? Is America ready for a the absence of a hereditary monarchy in the United woman president in 2016? States may have had the unintended consequence of dampening public support for women leaders. In 2015, only six of the nation’s McDonagh also argues that the United States lags be- hind other nations in social welfare provision; having a fifty governors are women, stronger welfare state—a government function more in almost 100 years after the very line with women’s traditional areas of expertise—would make for a political tradition more hospitable to a first woman served as governor female president.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exit Poll Phenomenon
    Chapter 1 The Exit Poll Phenomenon n election day in the United States, exit polls are the talk of the nation. Even before ballot- O ing has concluded, the media uses voters’ responses about their electoral choices to project final results for a public eager for immediate information. Once votes have been tallied, media commentators from across the political landscape rely almost exclusively on exit polls to explain election outcomes. The exit polls show what issues were the most important in the minds of the voters. They identify how different groups in the electorate cast their ballots. They expose which character traits helped or hurt particular candidates. They even reveal voters’ expectations of the government moving forward. In the weeks and months that follow, exit polls are used time and again to give meaning to the election results. Newly elected officials rely on them to substantiate policy mandates they claim to have received from voters. Partisan pundits scrutinize them for successful and failed campaign strategies. Even political strategists use them to pinpoint key groups and issues that need to be won over to succeed in future elections. Unfortunately, these same exit poll results are not easily accessible to members of the public interested in dissecting them. After appearing in the next day’s newspapers or on a politically ori- ented website, they disappear quickly from sight as the election fades in prominence. Eventually, the exit polls are archived at universities where only subscribers are capable of retrieving the data. But nowhere is a complete set of biennial exit poll results available in an easy-to-use format for curious parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Let ABC Keep You Safe at Home Healthcare®
    FINAL-1 Sat, Apr 9, 2016 7:02:23 PM Residential&Commercial Sales and Rentals tvspotlight Vadala Real Proudly Serving Your Weekly Guide to TV Entertainment Cape Ann Estate Since 1975 • For the week of April 16 - 22, 2016 • 1 x 3” Massachusetts Certified Appraisers 978-281-1111 I spy VadalaRealEstate.com 9-DDr. OsmanBabsonRd. Gloucester,MA Tom Hiddleston PEDIATRIC stars in “The Night ORTHODONTICS Manager” “Dear Chelsea Berry, We love your smile!Dr. We J.H. look Ahlinforward to your performance at Shalin Liu. Best of luck with your fabulous1 xcareer!” 4” Dr. Ahlin [email protected] CREATING HAPPINESS ONE SMILE AT A TIME • Dental Bleaching included for all orthodontic & cosmetic dental patients. • 100% reduction in all orthodontic fees for families with a parent serving in a combat zone. Call Jane: 978-283-9020 for a complimentary orthodontic consultation or 2nd opinion J.H. Ahlin, DDS • One Essex Ave. Intersection of Routes 127 & 133 Gloucester, MA 01930 www.gloucesterorthodontics.com LetABC Keep You Safe at Home Home ® ABC Home HealthcareHealthcare 2 Prx 3"ofessionals Local family-owned home care agency specializinginelderly and chronic care 978-281-1001 www.abchhp.com FINAL-1 Sat, Apr 9, 2016 7:02:24 PM 2 • Gloucester Daily Times • April 16 - 22, 2016 By the book John le Carré’s best-selling spy novel comes to AMC By Jacqueline Spendlove TV Media f “Game of Thrones” has taught us anything, it’s that Isome stories just can’t be told in two hours, so don’t even try it. These days, TV is the medium you turn to if you want to do a book justice in its translation to screen.
    [Show full text]
  • THE COLOR of NEWS: How Different Media Have Covered the General Election
    THE COLOR OF NEWS: How Different Media Have Covered the General Election When it comes to coverage of the campaign for president 2008, where one goes for news makes a difference, according to a new study. In cable, the evidence firmly suggests there now really is an ideological divide between two of the three channels, at least in their coverage of the campaign. Things look much better for Barack Obama—and much worse for John McCain—on MSNBC than in most other news outlets. On the Fox News Channel, the coverage of the presidential candidates is something of a mirror image of that seen on MSNBC. The tone of CNN’s coverage, meanwhile, lay somewhere in the middle of the cable spectrum, and was generally more negative than the press overall. On the evening newscasts of the three traditional networks, in contrast, there is no such ideological split. Indeed, on the nightly newscasts of ABC, CBS and NBC, coverage tends to be more neutral and generally less negative than elsewhere. On the network morning shows, Sarah Palin is a bigger story than she is in the media generally. And on NBC News programs, there was no reflection of the tendency of its cable sibling MSNBC toward more favorable coverage of Democrats and more negative of Republicans than the norm. Online, meanwhile, polling tended to drive the news. And on the front pages of newspapers, which often have the day-after story, things look tougher for John McCain than they tend to in the media overall. 1 These are some of the findings of the study, which examined 2,412 stories from 48 outlets during the time period from September 8 to October 16.1 The report is a companion to a study released October 22 about the tone of coverage overall.
    [Show full text]
  • The Race for the White House
    : SPECIAL REPORT The Race for the White House Madrid, August 2016 Barcelona • Bogota • Buenos Aires • Havana • Lima • Lisbon • Madrid • Mexico City • Miami • New York City • Panama City • Quito • Rio de Janeiro • Sao Paulo Santiago • Santo Domingo • Washington, DC THE RACE FOR THE WHITE HOUSE 1. INTRODUCTION If the American elections were held today, Hillary Clinton would 1. INTRODUCTION be elected the 45th president of the United States. Over the last 2. THE BACKSTORY month, Donald Trump has fumbled away his brief lead in national 3. THE CANDIDATES polls and trails in the handful of battleground states that will 4. THE CAMPAIGNS ultimately decide who wins and who loses. Hillary Clinton has 5. WHAT MATTERS? been smart enough to let her opponent trip over his own ego and 6. THE MORNING AFTER political inexperience, without offering new targets to her many 7. THE MORNING AFTER THE enemies across the political spectrum. MORNING AFTER Pollsters, the media and elites have already declared the election all but over. Figure 1. Clinton vs. Trump: the polls Source: Huffpost Pollster (August 17, 2016) But the election is not today, and pollsters, the media and –above all– the elites have been wrong about Donald Trump since he declared his candidacy in June 2015, saying, “We need somebody that literally will take this country and make it great again.” The fact is that Clinton can still lose and Trump can still win, and imagining a path to a Trump victory does not also require belief in Santa Claus or unicorns. Actually, against all odds, he already did in the primary elections.
    [Show full text]
  • MAT TYPE 001 L578o "Levine, Lawrence W"
    CALL #(BIBLIO) AUTHOR TITLE LOCATION UPDATED(ITEM) MAT TYPE 001 L578o "Levine, Lawrence W" "The opening of the American mind : canons, culture, and history / Lawrence W. Levine" b 001.56 B632 "The Body as a medium of expression : essays based on a course of lectures given at the Institute of Contemporary Arts, London / edited by Jonathan Benthall and Ted Polhemus" b 001.9 Sh26e "Shaw, Eva, 1947-" "Eve of destruction : prophecies, theories, and preparations for the end of the world / by Eva Shaw" b 001.942 C841u "Craig, Roy, 1924-" UFOs : an insider's view of the official quest for evidence / by Roy Craig b 001.942 R159p "Randle, Kevin D., 1949-" Project Blue Book exposed / Kevin D. Randle b 001.942 St97u "Sturrock, Peter A. (Peter Andrew)" The UFO enigma : a new review of the physical evidence / Peter A. Sturrock b 001.942 Uf7 The UFO phenomenon / by the editors of Time- Life Books b 001.944 M191m "Mackal, Roy P" The monsters of Loch Ness / Roy P. Mackal b 001.944 M541s "Meredith, Dennis L" Search at Loch Ness : the expedition of the New York times and the Academy of Applied Science / Dennis L. Meredith b 001.96 L891s "Lorie, Peter" Superstitions / Peter Lorie b 004 P587c "Pickover, Clifford A" Computers and the imagination : visual adventures beyond the edge / Clifford A. Pickover b 004.16 R227 2001 Reader's Digest the new beginner's guide to home computing b 004.1675 Ip1b3 2013 "Baig, Edward C" iPad for dummies / by Edward C. Baig and Bob Dr. Mac LeVitus b 004.1675 Ip2i 2012 "iPhone for seniors : quickly start working with the user-friendly
    [Show full text]