Military Services Fifth–Generation Tactical Aircraft Challenges and F–35 Joint Strike Fighter Program Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Military Services Fifth–Generation Tactical Aircraft Challenges and F–35 Joint Strike Fighter Program Update i [H.A.S.C. No. 115–6] MILITARY SERVICES FIFTH–GENERATION TACTICAL AIRCRAFT CHALLENGES AND F–35 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER PROGRAM UPDATE HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION HEARING HELD FEBRUARY 16, 2017 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 24–678 WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 SUBCOMMITTEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio, Chairman FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey NIKI TSONGAS, Massachusetts PAUL COOK, California, Vice Chair JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island SAM GRAVES, Missouri JIM COOPER, Tennessee MARTHA MCSALLY, Arizona MARC A. VEASEY, Texas STEPHEN KNIGHT, California RUBEN GALLEGO, Arizona TRENT KELLY, Mississippi JACKY ROSEN, Nevada MATT GAETZ, Florida SALUD O. CARBAJAL, California DON BACON, Nebraska ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland JIM BANKS, Indiana TOM O’HALLERAN, Arizona WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina THOMAS R. SUOZZI, New York ROB BISHOP, Utah (Vacancy) ROBERT J. WITTMAN, Virginia MO BROOKS, Alabama JOHN SULLIVAN, Professional Staff Member DOUG BUSH, Professional Staff Member NEVE SCHADLER, Clerk (II) C O N T E N T S Page STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Tsongas, Hon. Niki, a Representative from Massachusetts, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces ................................................ 4 Turner, Hon. Michael R., a Representative from Ohio, Chairman, Subcommit- tee on Tactical Air and Land Forces .................................................................. 2 WITNESSES Bogdan, Lt Gen Christopher C., USAF, Program Executive Officer, F–35 Joint Program Office ............................................................................................ 4 Davis, LtGen Jon M., USMC, Deputy Commandant for Aviation, Headquar- ters, U.S. Marine Corps ....................................................................................... 7 Harris, Lt Gen (Select) Jerry D., USAF, Deputy Chief of Staff for Plans, Programs, and Requirements, Headquarters, U.S. Air Force .......................... 10 Miller, RADM DeWolfe, USN, Director, Air Warfare (OPNAV N98), Head- quarters, U.S. Navy ............................................................................................. 9 APPENDIX PREPARED STATEMENTS: Bogdan, Lt Gen Christopher C. ....................................................................... 44 Davis, LtGen Jon M. ........................................................................................ 75 Harris, Lt Gen (Select) Jerry D. ...................................................................... 91 Miller, RADM DeWolfe .................................................................................... 83 Turner, Hon. Michael R. .................................................................................. 41 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD: [There were no Documents submitted.] WITNESS RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS ASKED DURING THE HEARING: [There were no Questions submitted during the hearing.] QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BY MEMBERS POST HEARING: Mr. Bacon .......................................................................................................... 112 Mr. Lamborn ..................................................................................................... 114 Mr. Langevin ..................................................................................................... 111 Mr. LoBiondo .................................................................................................... 111 Mr. Turner ........................................................................................................ 105 (III) MILITARY SERVICES FIFTH–GENERATION TACTICAL AIRCRAFT CHALLENGES AND F–35 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER PROGRAM UPDATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES, Washington, DC, Thursday, February 16, 2017. The subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 9:05 a.m., in room 2118, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Michael R. Turner (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Mr. TURNER. The hearing will come to order. The subcommittee meets today to receive testimony on the mili- tary services fifth-generation tactical aircraft challenges and to re- ceive an update on the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter [JSF] Program. I want to welcome our distinguished witness panel for today: Lieutenant General Chris Bogdan, United States Air Force, F–35 Program Executive Officer; Lieutenant General Jon M. Davis, United States Marine Corps, Deputy Commandant for Aviation; Rear Admiral DeWolfe ‘‘Chip’’ Miller, United States Navy, Navy Di- rector of Air Warfare; and Lieutenant General (Select) General Jerry D. Harris, United States Air Force, Deputy Chief of Staff for Plans, Programs, and Requirements. Gentlemen, we thank you for your service and we look forward to your important testimony today. Before we begin, we would like to take care of some administra- tive details. I am pleased to announce that Paul Cook will again be serving as the vice chairman of this subcommittee. Paul, thank you for agreeing to be vice chairman. Mr. COOK. Thank you. Mr. TURNER. I now will turn to introducing the new members who are on the subcommittee. Our new members include Don Bacon, who represents Nebraska’s Second Congressional District. A retired Air Force brigadier general, Don has commanded twice at the wing level, at Offutt Air Force Base and Ramstein, Germany. Matt Gaetz represents Florida’s First District, home of one of the largest military districts in the country, including Naval Air Sta- tion Pensacola and Eglin Air Force Base. Trent Kelly represents Mississippi’s First District. A colonel in the Mississippi Army National Guard, he has served for 30 years as an engineer, including multiple tours in Iraq. We also have Jim Banks, who represents Indiana’s Third Dis- trict, home of 122nd Fighter Wing of Indiana National Guard. A Navy supply officer, he has recently completed a tour in Afghani- stan. (1) 2 We are glad to have our new members of the subcommittee and I will now turn to our ranking member, Ms. Tsongas, who will also introduce the new members who are our Democrats. Ms. TSONGAS. Thank you, Mr. Turner, and I look forward to working with you. And welcome those who are here today to tes- tify. I would like to recognize our new members to the subcommittee. First, I would like to welcome my colleagues Jim Langevin of Rhode Island and Jim Cooper of Tennessee, who are by no means new to HASC [House Armed Services Committee]. Both Mr. Lange- vin and Mr. Cooper are ranking members; Mr. Langevin on Emerg- ing Threats and Capabilities, Mr. Cooper on Strategic Forces Sub- committees. Mr. Cooper actually also served on this subcommittee as recently as the 113th Congress, and we are lucky to have him back. I would also like to recognize additional new members at the subcommittee who are also new to Congress. Congresswoman Jack- ie Rosen of Nevada’s Third Congressional District most recently served as a president of the largest reform synagogue in southern Nevada. Her district is just a short drive from Nellis Air Force Base and home to the U.S. Air Force Warfare Center. Congressman Salud Carbajal represents the 24th Congressional District of California which is home to a number of military facili- ties, including Vandenberg Air Force Base. Congressman Carbajal served 8 years in the United States Marine Corps Reserve, includ- ing active duty service during the 1991 Gulf war. Congressman Anthony Brown represents Maryland’s Fourth Con- gressional District and previously served as Maryland’s Lieutenant Governor and Majority Whip in the House of Delegates. Congress- man Brown was awarded the Legion of Merit for his 30 years of distinguished military service and the Bronze Star for his service in Iraq. Congressman Tom O’Halleran served for 8 years in the Arizona State legislature before coming to Congress. Prior to his time as an elected official, Tom served on the Chicago Board of Trade and was a small-business owner. And Congressman Tom Suozzi represents the north shore of Long Island, as well as northwestern Queens. Previously he served as mayor of his hometown, Glen Cove, New York, and was a county executive of Nassau County. Again, thank you and we welcome them all, not all here today, but I am sure will be participating on a regular basis. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. MICHAEL R. TURNER, A REP- RESENTATIVE FROM OHIO, CHAIRMAN, SUBCOMMITTEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES Mr. TURNER. Thank you, Ms. Tsongas. I want to thank you again for your commitment to the bipartisan spirit of this subcommittee, which I know we will see in our new members also as a result of your leadership and our relationship. This is a timely hearing and it is complementary to our Chair- man Mac Thornberry’s full committee hearing on the state of the military. Last week, the committee heard testimony from each of 3 the military services’ vice chiefs of staff that the force is strained and that the services have to do more with less. These challenges combined with years of budget-driven national security strategies and cuts, rather than threat-based strategies, have led to a military readiness crisis. With a new administration indicating its intent to rebuild the U.S. Armed Forces, I look for- ward to
Recommended publications
  • Offutt Air Force Base Informational Brochure
    Offutt Air Force Base Informational Brochure In 2015, a JLUS for the Offutt Air Force Base (AFB) was developed through a collaborative planning effort between the cities of Bellevue, Council Bluffs, Glenwood, La Vista, Omaha, Papillion and Plattsmouth, as well Cass, Douglas, Mills, Pottawattamie, and Sarpy Counties. The JLUS program was developed by the Department of Defense (DOD) as a cooperative land use planning effort between affected local government(s) and military installations. The JLUS Program is designed to provide a cooperative environment within which present and future land use development and land use decisions can be made. The 2015 JLUS identified area growth and economic trends, the facilities and mission of the AFB, land use policies and programs, compatibility issues with AFB operations, and a recommended course of action. Offutt AFB JLUS Overview All AFB installations attract developments. Housing is constructed for AFB employees who want to live near, and businesses are established to serve the AFB and its employees. As development increase around the AFB, more people are exposed to noise and accident potential associated with aircraft operations. The Air Installation Compatibility Use Zone (AICUZ) program was created by the DOD in 1973 to address noise and safety hazards associated with aviation operations. The AICUZ program was established to minimize impacts from aviation operations (noise and accidents) through specific attention to development and land uses. The AICUZ framework evaluates noise from military aircraft, and applies the concept of clear zones and accident potential zones with corresponding development and building intensities designed to encourage compatibility between military operations and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Customers 'Left Holding the Bag'
    Life insurance medical exams on life support C1 PANORAMA Appearing at the Sumter Opera House Game show, country music, comedy and more at Main Stage series A5 SERVING SOUTH CAROLINA SINCE OCTOBER 15, 1894 SUNDAY, AUGUST 6, 2017 $1.75 IN SPORTS: Week by week look at the prep football season B1 Customers ‘left holding the bag’ Sen. McElveen calls for special session of Legislature on abandoned nuke plants BY JEFFREY COLLINS actors is impulsive, and there by Senate Major- “There just needs to be a this week to review that law Associated Press isn’t a reason to immediately ity Leader Shane timeout, a pause, whatever and to consider firing the call a special session. Massey of Edge- you want to call it, until the members of the Public Ser- COLUMBIA — Both Demo- Pressure to do something, field and Senate General Assembly has the op- vice Commission, which has cratic and Republican law- whether stopping any new Minority Leader portunity to understand in de- to approve all of SCE&G’s makers in South Carolina, in- rate hikes or firing lawmaker- Nikki Setzler of tail what has happened here,” rate hikes. cluding Sen. Thomas approved regulators, is McELVEEN West Columbia, said Setzler, who was one of Sen. McElveen, a member McElveen, D-Sumter, want mounting in the days after calling for law- 25 Senate sponsors of a 2007 of the caucus, said he would the Legislature to return soon South Carolina Electric & Gas makers to return law that allowed utilities to in- like to halt any further rate to deal with the abandonment and Santee Cooper decided to Columbia and pass a reso- crease rates to pay for the increase requests.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015
    Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015 – The Air Force is committed to preventing, deterring, and prosecuting sexual assault in its ranks. This report contains a synopsis of sexual assault cases taken to trial by court-martial. The information contained herein is a matter of public record. This is the final report of this nature the Air Force will produce. All results of general and special courts-martial for trials occurring after 1 April 2015 will be available on the Air Force’s Court-Martial Docket Website (www.afjag.af.mil/docket/index.asp). SIGNIFICANT AIR FORCE SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE SUMMARIES 2010 – March 2015 Note: This report lists cases involving a conviction for a sexual assault offense committed against an adult and also includes cases where a sexual assault offense against an adult was charged and the member was either acquitted of a sexual assault offense or the sexual assault offense was dismissed, but the member was convicted of another offense involving a victim. The Air Force publishes these cases for deterrence purposes. Sex offender registration requirements are governed by Department of Defense policy in compliance with federal and state sex offender registration requirements. Not all convictions included in this report require sex offender registration. Beginning with July 2014 cases, this report also indicates when a victim was represented by a Special Victims’ Counsel. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, sexual assaults against those 16 years of age and older are charged as crimes against adults. The appropriate disposition of sexual assault allegations and investigations may not always include referral to trial by court-martial.
    [Show full text]
  • BOOK REVIEWS the Air Force Way of War: US Tactics and Training After
    BOOK REVIEWS For military personnel who return from a mission and wonder “victims” of the day-to-day repercussions of operational stress about its impacts on them, La voie du retour will provide some injuries and that, in their own way, they too participate in the answers, de-stigmatize some of their reactions, and help them operational missions. As I have said before, the men and women make connections between their mental health and their work in who deploy on missions receive medals when they return, and so the military. It might even lead them to consult a mental health should their families. Had more space been devoted to the issues professional. Having worked in the Canadian Armed Forces, and challenges faced by family members, it would have added I am well aware that mental health is still a taboo topic in the to the book’s value. CAF today. This book offers information and raises awareness on the subject. It will help readers understand that it is possible to In conclusion, I encourage all brothers and sisters in arms have “normal” mental and behavioural reactions to “abnormal” and all veterans who are wondering about their personal state, events in life. Military operations are generally carried out in their emotional or behavioural reactions or their mental health to settings where personnel are likely to be exposed to potentially obtain a copy of La voie du retour, read it attentively, and complete traumatic events. the activities and exercises it suggests. Doing so could enhance their personal growth and shed light on the connections between The book deals with a multitude of topics directly related to their mental and emotional state and their military mission in a operational stress injuries and operational missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Defense Procurement and the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter by Bert Chapman (Review)
    Global Defense Procurement and the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter by Bert Chapman (review) Steven J. Childs Journal of Advanced Military Studies, Volume 11, Number 1, 2020, pp. 242-245 (Review) Published by Marine Corps University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/796228/summary [ Access provided at 24 Sep 2021 09:31 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Journal of Advanced Military Studies Global Defense Procurement and the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. By Bert Chapman. Basel, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. Pp. 396. $99.99 (hardcover); $79.99 (ebook). The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) is among the most controversial U.S. defense procurement programs in Pentagon history. Originally envisioned as the more affordable “lo” to the “hi” of the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor, the system reflects the culmination of the Department of Defense’s culture of “jointness,” but in procurement rather than operations. From the program’s onset, it has been an ambitious endeavor to replace four at- tack and fighter aircraft models used by the Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps with a single airframe, and with variants designed to operate from convention- al runways, aircraft carriers, and helicopter carriers or forward locations using short takeoff and vertical landing capability. As a fifth-generation fighter, this stealth airframe features internal weapons carriage and incorporates advances in fusing information through its sensor suite. On top of it all, the program relies heavily on international cooperation in the production process through a tiered partner arrangement.
    [Show full text]
  • Mp-Msg-035-12
    Evaluating the Impacts of Mission Training via Distributed Simulation on Live Exercise Performance: Results from the US/UK “Red Skies” Study Ebb Smith Heather McIntyre Bedford Technology Park Bedford Technology Park Thurleigh, Beds, MK44 2FQ Thurleigh, Beds, MK44 2FQ United Kingdom United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] Sara Elizabeth Gehr Margaret Schurig 6030 S. Kent St. 6030 S. Kent St. Mesa, AZ 85212 Mesa, AZ 85212 United States United States [email protected] [email protected] Steve Symons Brian Schreiber 6030 S. Kent St. 6030 S. Kent St. Mesa, AZ 85212 Mesa, AZ 85212 United States United States [email protected] [email protected] Winston Bennett, Jr. 6030 S. Kent St. Mesa, AZ 85212 United States [email protected] ABSTRACT Over the past several years, the UK Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) and the US Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) have been involved in research to develop training and assessment methods for use in mission training via distributed simulation. As part of our efforts, we have developed competency-based training and rehearsal scenarios and data collection instrumentation for routinely delivering and assessing distributed training events. Our most recent collaborative study, named “Red Skies,” involved extending our work to include field assessments of the training benefits derived from involvement in a simulation–based distributed mission training event and subsequent live flying at a Coalition Smith, E.; McIntyre, H.; Gehr, S.E.; Schurig, M.; Symons, S.; Schreiber, B.; Bennett Jr., W.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Training: Further Analysis and Planning Needed to Improve Effectiveness, GAO-16-635SU (Washington, D.C.: Aug
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees September 2016 AIR FORCE TRAINING Further Analysis and Planning Needed to Improve Effectiveness GAO-16-864 September 2016 AIR FORCE TRAINING Further Analysis and Planning Needed to Improve Effectiveness Highlights of GAO-16-864, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found For more than a decade, the Air Force The Air Force establishes combat aircrew training requirements for the full range focused its training on supporting of core missions based on an annual process, but these requirements may not operations in the Middle East. The Air reflect current and emerging training needs, because the Air Force has not Force has established goals for its comprehensively reassessed the assumptions underlying them. Specifically, combat aircrews to conduct training for assumptions about the total annual live-fly sortie requirements by aircraft, the the full range of core missions. Both criteria for designating aircrews as experienced or inexperienced, and the mix the Senate and House Reports between live and simulator training have remained the same since 2012. For accompanying bills for the FY 2016 example, Air Combat Command has set the same minimum number of live-fly National Defense Authorization Act sortie requirements across aircraft platforms, but has not conducted the analysis included a provision for GAO to review needed to determine if requirements should differ based on the number of core the Air Force’s training plans. missions for each platform. Reassessing the assumptions underlying annual This report discusses the extent to training requirements would better position the Air Force to meet its stated goals which the Air Force has (1) determined for its forces to achieve a range of missions for current and emerging threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Almanac ■ Guide to Air Force Installations Worldwide
    USAFAlmanac ■ Guide to Air Force Installations Worldwide Major Installations Note: A major installation is an Air Force Base, Air Andrews AFB, Md. 20762-5000; 10 mi. SE of 4190th Wing, Pisa, Italy; 31st Munitions Support Base, Air Guard Base, or Air Reserve Base that Washington, D. C. Phone (301) 981-1110; DSN Sqdn., Ghedi AB, Italy; 4190th Air Base Sqdn. serves as a self-supporting center for Air Force 858-1110. AMC base. Gateway to the nation’s (Provisional), San Vito dei Normanni, Italy; 496th combat, combat support, or training operations. capital and home of Air Force One. Host wing: 89th Air Base Sqdn., Morón AB, Spain; 731st Munitions Active-duty, Air National Guard (ANG), or Air Force Airlift Wing. Responsible for Presidential support Support Sqdn., Araxos AB, Greece; 603d Air Control Reserve Command (AFRC) units of wing size or and base operations; supports all branches of the Sqdn., Jacotenente, Italy; 48th Intelligence Sqdn., larger operate the installation with all land, facili- armed services, several major commands, and Rimini, Italy. One of the oldest Italian air bases, ties, and support needed to accomplish the unit federal agencies. The wing also hosts Det. 302, dating to 1911. USAF began operations in 1954. mission. There must be real property accountability AFOSI; Hq. Air Force Flight Standards Agency; Area 1,467 acres. Runway 8,596 ft. Altitude 413 through ownership of all real estate and facilities. AFOSI Academy; Air National Guard Readiness ft. Military 3,367; civilians 1,102. Payroll $156.9 Agreements with foreign governments that give Center; 113th Wing (D. C.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Flag for a World Coalition
    Red Flag for a World Coalition 40 AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2006 Red Flag for a World Coalition The February Red Flag in Nevada featured Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, British, and Australian forces, with more than 130 aircraft and 2,500 troops taking part. Photography by Richard VanderMeulen Over the Nevada desert, an F-15E waits off the wing of a KC-135 tanker for its turn to take on fuel. AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2006 41 he Air Force’s premier realistic Ttraining exercise, Red Flag, played out in an unusual way in the skies over Nellis Air Force Base and the Nevada Test and Training Range this winter. For the first time, dedicated “aggres- sor” F-15s took part. Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and foreign forces honed their skills for upcoming deploy- ments. Red Flag’s hallmark is realistic combat in a controlled environment, featur- ing battles against skilled opponents. The opportunity to engage dissimilar aircraft using enemy tactics is also important and is often a change for units that typically fly against others from the same unit. Taking off at right is an F-15E of the 90th Fighter Squadron, Elmendorf AFB, Alaska. Afterburners lit, this F-111 of the Royal Australian Air Force takes off and has not yet closed its landing gear door. The RAAF is the last air force still flying the F-111. Nations such as Australia come to Red Flag for the opportunity to fly with the US and to take advantage of the vast Nellis range. At right, an F-16C from Cannon AFB, N.M., takes off with an assortment of air- to-air missiles hung on its wings.
    [Show full text]
  • 16004491.Pdf
    -'DEFENSE ATOMIC SUPPORT AGENCY Sandia Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico ,L/PE - 175 Hi%&UhIiT~ SAIdDIA BASE ALBu2umxJE, la$ mXIc0 7 October 1960 This is to cert!e tlmt during the TDY period at this station, Govement Guarters were available and Goverrrment Fessing facilities were not availzble for the following mmoers of I%Ki: Colonel &w, Og~arHe USA Pi3 jor Andm~n,Qaude T. USAF Lt. Colonel fsderacn, George R. USAF Doctor lrndMvrsj could Re Doctor Acdrem, Howard L. USPIG Colonel ksMlla stephen G. USA Colonel Ayars, Laurence S. USAF Lt. Colonel Bec~ew~ki,Zbignie~ J. USAF Lt. Colonel BaMinp, George S., Jr. USAF bjor Barlow, Lundie I:., Jr. UMG Ckmzzder m, h3.llian E. USPHS Ujor Gentley, Jack C. UskF Colonel Sess, Ceroge C. , WAF Docto2 Eethard, 2. F. Lt. c=Jlonel Eayer, David H., USfiF hejor Bittick, Paul, Jr. USAF COlOIle3. Forah, hUlhm N. USAF &;tail? Boulerman, :!alter I!. USAF Comander hwers, Jesse L. USN Cz?trin Brovm, Benjamin H, USAF Ca?tain Bunstock, lrKulam H. USAF Colonel Campbell, lkul A. USAF Colonel Caples, Joseph T. USA Colonel. Collins, CleM J. USA rmctor Collins, Vincent P. X. Colonel c0nner#, Joseph A. USAF Cx:kain ktis, Sidney H. USAF Lt. Colonel Dauer, hxmll USA Colonel kvis, Paul w, USAF Captsir: Deranian, Paul UShT Loctcir Dllle, J. Robert Captain Duffher, Gerald J. USN hctor Duguidp Xobert H. kptain arly, klarren L. use Ca?,kin Endera, Iamnce J. USAF Colonel hspey, James G., Jr. USAF’ & . Farber, Sheldon USNR Caifain Farmer, C. D. USAF Ivajor Fltzpatrick, Jack C. USA Colonel FYxdtt, Nchard s.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Command and Control the Need for Increased Adaptability
    AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Air Force Command and Control The Need for Increased Adaptability LT COL JEFFREY HUKILL, USAF, RETIRED (TEAM LEADER) COL LARRY CARTER, USAF, RETIRED COL SCOTT JOHNSON, USAF, RETIRED JENNIFER LIZZOL, DAF CIVILIAN COL EDWARD REDMAN, USAF DR. PANAYOTIS YANNAKOGEORGOS, DAF CIVILIAN Research Paper 2012–5 Air Force Research Institute Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112–6026 July 2012 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Air Force Research Institute, Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Air Force Research Institute (AFRI) papers and other scholarly Air University studies provide independent analysis and constructive discussion on issues impor­ tant to Air Force commanders, staffs, and other deci­ sion makers. Each paper can also be a valuable tool for defining further research. These studies are available electronically or in print via the AU Press website at http://aupress.au.af.mil/papers.asp. To make comments about this paper or submit a manu­ script to be considered for publication, please e­mail AFRI at [email protected]. ii Contents List of Illustrations iv CSAF Tasking Letter v About the Authors vii Executive Summary ix Introduction 1 A Framework for Analyzing Command and Control Structures 2 Analytical Model 2 Results
    [Show full text]