DOCSLIB.ORG

Air Force Training: Further Analysis and Planning Needed to Improve Effectiveness, GAO-16-635SU (Washington, D.C.: Aug

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air Force Training: Further Analysis and Planning Needed to Improve Effectiveness, GAO-16-635SU (Washington, D.C.: Aug United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees September 2016 AIR FORCE TRAINING Further Analysis and Planning Needed to Improve Effectiveness GAO-16-864 September 2016 AIR FORCE TRAINING Further Analysis and Planning Needed to Improve Effectiveness Highlights of GAO-16-864, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found For more than a decade, the Air Force The Air Force establishes combat aircrew training requirements for the full range focused its training on supporting of core missions based on an annual process, but these requirements may not operations in the Middle East. The Air reflect current and emerging training needs, because the Air Force has not Force has established goals for its comprehensively reassessed the assumptions underlying them. Specifically, combat aircrews to conduct training for assumptions about the total annual live-fly sortie requirements by aircraft, the the full range of core missions. Both criteria for designating aircrews as experienced or inexperienced, and the mix the Senate and House Reports between live and simulator training have remained the same since 2012. For accompanying bills for the FY 2016 example, Air Combat Command has set the same minimum number of live-fly National Defense Authorization Act sortie requirements across aircraft platforms, but has not conducted the analysis included a provision for GAO to review needed to determine if requirements should differ based on the number of core the Air Force’s training plans. missions for each platform. Reassessing the assumptions underlying annual This report discusses the extent to training requirements would better position the Air Force to meet its stated goals which the Air Force has (1) determined for its forces to achieve a range of missions for current and emerging threats. requirements to train combat aircrews for the full range of core missions, Combat fighter squadrons were generally able to complete mission training (2) met annual training requirements requirements for ongoing contingency operations, such as close air support to for combat fighter squadrons across ground forces, but were unable to meet annual training requirements across the the full range of core missions and full range of core missions. Further, the Air Force does not systematically evaluated the effectiveness of this evaluate the effectiveness of training that has been completed against training, and (3) established virtual established expectations. Selected unit commanders that GAO interviewed cited training plans that include desirable four common factors that limited their ability to complete training, such as high characteristics of a comprehensive deployment rates, and other factors that affected the training that aircrews were strategy. GAO reviewed Air Force able to accomplish. However, Air Force processes used to record and monitor training requirements and plans and annual training do not include a systematic evaluation of training effectiveness interviewed officials with a non- against expectations. Specifically, Air Combat Command has not established the generalizable sample of units based on desired learning objectives or training support elements needed to accomplish the units’ range of core missions. training expectations and does not collect data to assess effectiveness. A more What GAO Recommends consistent basis for monitoring results is critical in tracking the Air Force’s progress in training units for the full range of core missions. GAO recommends that the Air Force (1) reassess assumptions for annual Air Force plans for virtual training do not include all desirable characteristics of a training requirements, (2) establish and comprehensive strategy, such as a risk-based investment strategy or a time line collect data on desired learning for addressing training needs. A strategy that included these elements would objectives and training support help ensure that the Air Force’s plans addressed its capability needs. elements for its training expectations, This is a public version of a sensitive report GAO issued in August 2016. It omits and (3) develop a risk-based sensitive information and data on some of the Air Force’s training priorities, investment strategy for its virtual training plans. DOD concurred with the completion of annual training requirements for active-duty fighter squadrons, and third recommendation and did not aircraft maintenance generation capabilities. concur with the first and second recommendations, stating that existing initiatives and policies address these issues. GAO believes the recommendations remain valid for the reasons discussed in this report. View GAO-16-864. For more information, contact Cary Russell at (202) 512-5431 or [email protected]. United States Government Accountability Office Contents Letter 1 Background 5 The Air Force’s Process for Developing Combat Aircrew Annual Training Requirements for the Full Range of Core Missions Is Based on Dated Assumptions 10 Combat Fighter Squadrons Are Not Meeting All of Their Annual Training Requirements across the Full Range of Core Missions, and Completed Training Is Not Being Evaluated for Effectiveness 16 Air Force Planning Documents for Virtual Training Do Not Include All Desirable Characteristics of a Comprehensive Strategy 27 Conclusions 32 Recommendations for Executive Action 33 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 34 Appendix I Objectives, Scope, and Methodology 39 Appendix II Comments from the Department of Defense 44 Appendix III GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments 48 Table Table 1: Extent to Which the United States Air Force Live Virtual Constructive Operational Training Flight Plan and Combat Air Force Live, Virtual, Constructive Vision Address GAO’s Desirable Characteristics for Comprehensive Strategies 28 Figures Figure 1: Characteristics of Selected Fourth- and Fifth-Generation Combat Aircraft Platforms 7 Figure 2: Air Combat Command’s Process for Developing Annual Training Requirements 11 Figure 3: F-22 Aircraft Conducting a “Hot Pit” Refueling and an F- 15C Aircraft Conducting an Aerial Refueling 22 Page i GAO-16-864 Air Force Training Abbreviations AFI Air Force Instruction DOD Department of Defense FOUO For Official Use Only LVC Live, Virtual, and Constructive RAP Ready Aircrew Program This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. The published product may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. However, because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately. Page ii GAO-16-864 Air Force Training Letter 441 G St. N.W. Washington, DC 20548 September 19, 2016 Congressional Committees For more than a decade, the Air Force focused the training of its forces on supporting operations in the Middle East, including Iraq and Afghanistan. Commanders established training requirements that they deemed necessary to prepare aircrews to conduct missions in these locations—such as close air support to ground forces—limiting training opportunities in other areas. According to Air Force reports, in the coming years, the Air Force will confront an increasingly complex security environment that will demand a wider range of skill sets and different capabilities than are currently being employed.1 For example, aircrews may be called upon to conduct missions that require freedom of maneuver in highly-contested air spaces. To meet these emerging needs, the Air Force has established goals for its fighter aircrews to conduct training for a full range of core missions.2 Replicating complex threats—such as a highly-contested airspace—in a live training environment is resource intensive and can be constrained by several factors, including airspace restrictions, weather, and range capabilities, among others. The Air Force has stated that by integrating live, virtual, and constructive (LVC) components into training it could overcome some of the limitations of training in a live-only environment but notes that it will take time and dedicated resources to address technological and capacity limitations.3 The Air Force has further stated 1See, for example, Secretary of the Air Force, America’s Air Force: A Call to the Future (July 2014); U.S. Air Force, USAF Strategic Master Plan (May 2015). 2For the purposes of this report, we use the phrase “full range of core missions” to describe the primary and secondary missions as established in each aircraft’s Designed Operational Capability statement, which summarizes specific capabilities that an Air Force unit can be called on to provide. 3According to Air Force documents, the live (L) environment is defined as real people operating real weapons systems, the virtual (V) environment is defined as real people operating simulated systems, and the constructive (C) environment is identified as software models and code that are used to improve training scenarios with computer- generated entities—such as terrain, threats, aircraft, people, and vehicles, among others. For the purposes of this report, we refer to training that includes a simulator as virtual training. Page 1 GAO-16-864 Air Force Training that the integration of these components is particularly important for fifth- generation aircraft, such as the F-35, which will rely more heavily on virtual training because of the limitations of training in the live environment and security considerations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biography U N I T E D S T a T E S a I R F O R C E
    BIOGRAPHY U N I T E D S T A T E S A I R F O R C E LIEUTENANT GENERAL TIMOTHY D. HAUGH Lt. Gen. Timothy D. Haugh is the Commander, Sixteenth Air Force; Commander, Air Forces Cyber, and Commander, Joint Force Headquarters-Cyber, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas. General Haugh is responsible for more than 44,000 personnel conducting worldwide operations. Sixteenth Air Force Airmen deliver multisource intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance products, applications, capabilities and resources. In addition, they build, extend, operate, secure and defend the Air Force portion of the Department of Defense global network. Furthermore, Joint Forces Headquarters-Cyber personnel perform operational planning as part of coordinated efforts to support Air Force component and combatant commanders and, upon approval of the President and/or Secretary of Defense, the execution of offensive cyberspace operations. In his position as Sixteenth Air Force Commander, General Haugh also serves as the Commander of the Service Cryptologic Component. In this capacity, he is responsible to the Director, National Security Agency, and Chief, Central Security Service, as the Air Force’s sole authority for matters involving the conduct of cryptologic activities, including the spectrum of missions related to tactical warfighting and national-level operations. The general leads the global information warfare activities spanning cyberspace operations, intelligence, targeting, and weather for nine wings, one technical center, and an operations center. General Haugh received his commission in 1991, as a distinguished graduate of the ROTC program at Lehigh University. He has served in a variety of intelligence and cyber command and staff assignments.
    [Show full text]
  • AIRLIFT RODEO a Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989
    "- - ·· - - ( AIRLIFT RODEO A Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989 Office of MAC History Monograph by JefferyS. Underwood Military Airlift Command United States Air Force Scott Air Force Base, Illinois March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . iii Introduction . 1 CARP Rodeo: First Airdrop Competitions .............. 1 New Airplanes, New Competitions ....... .. .. ... ... 10 Return of the Rodeo . 16 A New Name and a New Orientation ..... ........... 24 The Future of AIRLIFT RODEO . ... .. .. ..... .. .... 25 Appendix I .. .... ................. .. .. .. ... ... 27 Appendix II ... ...... ........... .. ..... ..... .. 28 Appendix III .. .. ................... ... .. 29 ii FOREWORD Not long after the Military Air Transport Service received its air­ drop mission in the mid-1950s, MATS senior commanders speculated that the importance of the new airdrop mission might be enhanced through a tactical training competition conducted on a recurring basis. Their idea came to fruition in 1962 when MATS held its first airdrop training competition. For the next several years the competition remained an annual event, but it fell by the wayside during the years of the United States' most intense participation in the Southeast Asia conflict. The airdrop competitions were reinstated in 1969 but were halted again in 1973, because of budget cuts and the reduced emphasis being given to airdrop operations. However, the esprit de corps engendered among the troops and the training benefits derived from the earlier events were not forgotten and prompted the competition's renewal in 1979 in its present form. Since 1979 the Rodeos have remained an important training event and tactical evaluation exercise for the Military Airlift Command. The following historical study deals with the origins, evolution, and results of the tactical airlift competitions in MATS and MAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Nachbrenner 2021
    NACHBRENNER 2021 21.05.2021-10 Wissenswertes aus dem Bereich Militärluftfahrt und Luftkriegsführung Quelle: Ländercode: Schlüsselinformationen: Datum: Artikelname: 1 Inhaltsverzeichnis • 02 Sicherheitspolitik Schweiz und Air2030 • 07 Luft und Marineluftstreitkräfte sowie strategische und weitere luftgestützte Einsatzmittel • 16 Hubschrauber und Kipprotor-Flugzeuge • 18 Unbemannte Luftfahrzeuge (UAV) und Robotik • 21 Bewaffnung und weitere Nutzlasten • 23 Air Power • 39 Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance • 40 Cyber- und Electromagnetic Warfare • 42 Boden- und seegestützte Luftverteidigungssysteme • 44 Boden- und seegestützte Einsatzkräfte, Strategische Kampfmittel und Space Forces • 45 Geo- und Sicherheitspolitik, militärische Übungen • 48 Analysen, Studien, Reports, Fact Sheets, Infographics, Podcasts und Videos Sicherheitspolitik Schweiz und Air2030 www.proschweiz.ch Pro Schweiz Inhalt «Das Magazin für eine Das Land des Eigensinns 2 optimistische und Sicherheitspolitik – Wo stehen wir heute? 4 selbstsichere Schweiz» - Sicherheit gibt es nicht umsonst - Die Sichtweise zweier Luftwaffenoffizierinnen 10 Ausgabe Nr. 3 autonomiesuisse will Erfolgsmodell Schweiz sichern 16 Die Schweiz muss weder kuschen noch sich verstecken 18 Impressum 20 admin.ch Ernennung eines Der Bundesrat hat an seiner Sitzung vom 19. Mai 2021 Oberst i Gst Peter Bruns per 1. Juli 2021 zum 19.05.2021 Höheren Stabsoffiziers Kommandanten der Luftwaffenausbildungs- und Trainingsbrigade, unter gleichzeitiger Beförderung zum der Armee – Brigadier, ernannt. Er folgt auf Brigadier Peter Soller, den der Bundesrat am 12. März 2021 zum Kommandanten Br Peter Bruns Lehrverband Fliegerabwehr 33 ernannt hat. (Vollständige Medienmitteilung abrufbar unter: 2 https://www.admin.ch/gov/de/start/dokumentation/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-83579.html) latribune.fr Rafale, F-35, Eurofighter The Swiss Federal Council is expected to announce the choice of its future fighter aircraft by the end of June.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps AFJROTC
    Air Force Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps AFJROTC Arlington Independent School District Developing citizens of character dedicated to serving their community and nation. 1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 TX-031 AFJROTC WING Texas 31st Air Force Junior ROTC Wing was established in Arlington Independent School District in 1968 by an agreement between the Arlington Independent School District and the United States Air Force. The Senior Aerospace Science Instructor (SASI) is a retired Air Force officer. Aerospace Science Instructors (ASIs) are retired senior non-commissioned officers. These instructors have an extensive background in leadership, management, instruction and mentorship. The students who enroll in Air Force Junior ROTC are referred to as “Cadets”. The entire group of cadets is referred to as a Wing. The Cadet Wing is “owned”, managed and operated by students referred to as Cadet Officers and Cadet Non-commissioned Officers. Using this cadet organization structure, allows cadets to learn leadership skills through direct activities. The attached cadet handbook contains policy guidance, requirements and rules of conduct for AFJROTC cadets. Each cadet will study this handbook and be held responsible for knowing its contents. The handbook also describes cadet operations, cadet rank and chain of command, job descriptions, procedures for promotions, awards, grooming standards, and uniform wear. It supplements AFJROTC and Air Force directives. This guide establishes the standards that ensure the entire Cadet Wing works together towards a common goal of proficiency that will lead to pride in achievement for our unit. Your knowledge of Aerospace Science, development as a leader, and contributions to your High School and community depends upon the spirit in which you abide by the provisions of this handbook.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeannie Leavitt, MWAOHI Interview Transcript
    MILITARY WOMEN AVIATORS ORAL HISTORY INITIATIVE Interview No. 14 Transcript Interviewee: Major General Jeannie Leavitt, United States Air Force Date: September 19, 2019 By: Lieutenant Colonel Monica Smith, USAF, Retired Place: National Air and Space Museum South Conference Room 901 D Street SW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20024 SMITH: I’m Monica Smith at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. Today is September 19, 2019, and I have the pleasure of speaking with Major General Jeannie Leavitt, United States Air Force. This interview is being taped as part of the Military Women Aviators Oral History Initiative. It will be archived at the Smithsonian Institution. Welcome, General Leavitt. LEAVITT: Thank you. SMITH: So let’s start by me congratulating you on your recent second star. LEAVITT: Thank you very much. SMITH: You’re welcome. You’re welcome. So you just pinned that [star] on this month. Is that right? LEAVITT: That’s correct, effective 2 September. SMITH: Great. Great. So that’s fantastic, and we’ll get to your promotions and your career later. I just have some boilerplate questions. First, let’s just start with your full name and your occupation. LEAVITT: Okay. Jeannie Marie Leavitt, and I am the Commander of Air Force Recruiting Service. SMITH: Fantastic. So when did you first enter the Air Force? LEAVITT: I was commissioned December 1990, and came on active duty January 1992. SMITH: Okay. And approximately how many total flight hours do you have? LEAVITT: Counting trainers, a little over 3,000. SMITH: And let’s list, for the record, all of the aircraft that you have piloted.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Customers 'Left Holding the Bag'
    Life insurance medical exams on life support C1 PANORAMA Appearing at the Sumter Opera House Game show, country music, comedy and more at Main Stage series A5 SERVING SOUTH CAROLINA SINCE OCTOBER 15, 1894 SUNDAY, AUGUST 6, 2017 $1.75 IN SPORTS: Week by week look at the prep football season B1 Customers ‘left holding the bag’ Sen. McElveen calls for special session of Legislature on abandoned nuke plants BY JEFFREY COLLINS actors is impulsive, and there by Senate Major- “There just needs to be a this week to review that law Associated Press isn’t a reason to immediately ity Leader Shane timeout, a pause, whatever and to consider firing the call a special session. Massey of Edge- you want to call it, until the members of the Public Ser- COLUMBIA — Both Demo- Pressure to do something, field and Senate General Assembly has the op- vice Commission, which has cratic and Republican law- whether stopping any new Minority Leader portunity to understand in de- to approve all of SCE&G’s makers in South Carolina, in- rate hikes or firing lawmaker- Nikki Setzler of tail what has happened here,” rate hikes. cluding Sen. Thomas approved regulators, is McELVEEN West Columbia, said Setzler, who was one of Sen. McElveen, a member McElveen, D-Sumter, want mounting in the days after calling for law- 25 Senate sponsors of a 2007 of the caucus, said he would the Legislature to return soon South Carolina Electric & Gas makers to return law that allowed utilities to in- like to halt any further rate to deal with the abandonment and Santee Cooper decided to Columbia and pass a reso- crease rates to pay for the increase requests.
    [Show full text]
  • HOMETOWN HEROES HOMETOWN HEROES Heroic Stories from Brave Men and Women by Greg Mclntyre
    HOMETOWN HEROES HOMETOWN HEROES Heroic Stories From Brave Men and Women by Greg Mclntyre www.mcelderlaw.com Copyright © 2018 by Greg Mclntyre All Rights Reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical or electronic, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright holder. Published by Shelby House Publishing Web: www.mcelderlaw.com FRONT COVER IMAGE BIO he image on the front cover of this book is my Tgrandfather, J.C. Horne, in all his military splendor. Even today, reading the interview I did with him gives me chills. I loved that man with all my heart, he was my buddy. It’s hard for me to accept that the gentle man I knew and loved as my grandfather experienced the atrocities mentioned in his story. I can only imagine what four days R&R in Paris was like when you’d been fighting on the front lines during World War Two in Europe. You can read the interview with him in this book. Without veterans like my grandfather, we may not have a great country to call home. We owe Veterans our freedom. The world would be a much different place than it is today without their sacrifice. It is our duty to take care of them. PREFACE ’m Elder Law Attorney Greg McIntyre of McIntyre Elder Law. My passion is helping seniors protect their assets and legacies. II am also a veteran of the US Navy. I served on the USS Constellation and the USS Nimitz.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit B Department of the Air Force
    EXHIBIT B DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE AIR FORCE ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL (SECOND OAK LEAF CLUSTER) HAS BEEN AWARDED TO SENIOR AIRMAN JENNIFER L. HARRIS ~ FOR OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENT I FEBRUARY 2000 TO 18 JANUARY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Senior Airman Jennifer L. Harris distinguished herself by outstanding achievem_ent as Operations Resource Management Technician, 41st Airlift Squadron, 43d Ol~erations Group., 43d Airlift Wing, Poise Air-Force Base, North Carolina. Durin~ this period, Airman Harris’ initiative and unequaled job knowledge_while assigned to the 43d Operatmns Support Squadron Flight Records s~eetmn..were ins_tmm.ent..al t9 the vc~ng’s, phenom_ enal p_e.rformance d.uring the Twen~-.First Air ro,ree~.A,~.rerew Stand~.dlzatmn ap.d Evaluation. Visit. Her continual improvement of the jump ana mgnt pay accounung procedures, COUl~led with the errorless processinl,~ of over 100 basic and advanced aeronautical ratings and badges, directly contributed to the "Dutstandin~" rating Air~.,ana.w.arded_by ~.’.a~-ris the wereevaluation trem,,end.ous team. The as ,she pmfessional-_image ~,lgudeft" as Opera_tipn_s and work Group dedication Top Performer sliown .by for the ~onm o.~iviay. An exee~mnt example of midtary bearinl~ and behavior, she ~rovided support to Pope.Air F.o_.ree B~ase, .F.0rt Bra.~gg, .ahd__num.e.rous s.urrounding communities seiwing two tdiirs as a member of the ~Jase ~onor ,.iuaro: lhe distincttve accomplishments of Airman Harris reflect credit upon herself and the United States Air Force. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND 8 JANUARY 2001 43d Operations Group AF FDFIM ~274. 20000101 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE AIR FORCE ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL HAS BEEN AWARDED TO AIRMAN FIRST CLASS/ENNIFEK L.
    [Show full text]
  • Each Cadet Squadron Is Sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below Is The
    Each Cadet Squadron is sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below is the listing for the Cadet Squadron and the Sponsor Unit CS SPONSOR WING BASE MAJCOM 1 1st Fighter Wing 1 FW Langley AFB VA ACC 2 388th Fighter Wing 388 FW Hill AFB UT ACC 3 60th Air Mobility Wing 60 AMW Travis AFB CA AMC 4 15th Wing 15 WG Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam PACAF 5 12th Flying Training Wing 12 FTW Randolph AFB TX AETC 6 4th Fighter Wing 4 FW Seymour Johonson AFB NC ACC 7 49th Fighter Wing 49 FW Holloman AFB NM ACC 8 46th Test Wing 46 TW Eglin AFB FL AFMC 9 23rd Wing 23 WG Moody AFB GA ACC 10 56th Fighter Wing 56 FW Luke AFB AZ AETC 11 55th Wing AND 11th Wing 55WG AND 11WG Offutt AFB NE AND Andrews AFB ACC 12 325th Fighter Wing 325 FW Tyndall AFB FL AETC 13 92nd Air Refueling Wing 92 ARW Fairchild AFB WA AMC 14 412th Test Wing 412 TW Edwards AFB CA AFMC 15 355th Fighter Wing 375 AMW Scott AFB IL AMC 16 89th Airlift Wing 89 AW Andrews AFB MD AMC 17 437th Airlift Wing 437 AW Charleston AFB SC AMC 18 314th Airlift Wing 314 AW Little Rock AFB AR AETC 19 19th Airlift Wing 19 AW Little Rock AFB AR AMC 20 20th Fighter Wing 20 FW Shaw AFB SC ACC 21 366th Fighter Wing AND 439 AW 366 FW Mountain Home AFB ID AND Westover ARB ACC/AFRC 22 22nd Air Refueling Wing 22 ARW McConnell AFB KS AMC 23 305th Air Mobility Wing 305 AMW McGuire AFB NJ AMC 24 375th Air Mobility Wing 355 FW Davis-Monthan AFB AZ ACC 25 432nd Wing 432 WG Creech AFB ACC 26 57th Wing 57 WG Nellis AFB NV ACC 27 1st Special Operations Wing 1 SOW Hurlburt Field FL AFSOC 28 96th Air Base Wing AND 434th ARW 96 ABW
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Download (PDF)
    Q&A: JCS Vice Roles and Missions Reboot? 48| Pilot Training 44| Cost-Per-E ect Calculus 60 Chairman Gen. John Hyten 14 THE NEW ARCTIC STRATEGY Competition Intensifies in a Critical Region |52 September 2020 $8 Published by the Air Force Association THOSE BORN TO FLY LIVE TO WALK AWAY ACES 5®: Proven and ready Protecting aircrew is our mission. It’s why our ACES 5® ejection seat is the world’s only production seat proven to meet the exacting standards of MIL-HDBK-516C. Innovative technologies and consistent test results make ACES 5 the most advanced protection for your aircrew. Plus, we leverage 40 years of investment to keep your life-cycle costs at their lowest. ACES 5: Fielded and available today. The only ejection seat made in the United States. collinsaerospace.com/aces5 © 2020 Collins Aerospace CA_8338 Aces_5_ProvenReady_AirForceMagazine.indd 1 8/3/20 8:43 AM Client: Collins Aerospace - Missions Systems Ad Title: Aces 5 - Eject - Proven and Ready Filepath: /Volumes/GoogleDrive/Shared drives/Collins Aerospace 2020/_Collins Aerospace Ads/_Mission Systems/ACES 5_Ads/4c Ads/ Eject_Proven and ready/CA_8338 Aces_5_ProvenReady_AirForceMagazine.indd Publication: Air Force Magazine - September Trim: 8.125” x 10.875” • Bleed: 8.375” x 11.125” • Live: 7.375” x 10.125” STAFF Publisher September 2020. Vol. 103, No. 9 Bruce A. Wright Editor in Chief Tobias Naegele Managing Editor Juliette Kelsey Chagnon Editorial Director John A. Tirpak News Editor Amy McCullough Assistant Managing Editor Chequita Wood Senior Designer Dashton Parham Pentagon Editor Brian W. Everstine Master Sgt. Christopher Boitz Sgt. Christopher Master Digital Platforms Editor DEPARTMENTS FEATURES T-38C Talons Jennifer-Leigh begin to break 2 Editorial: Seize 14 Q&A: The Joint Focus Oprihory the High Ground away from an echelon for- Senior Editor By Tobias Naegele Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Meritorious Service Medal (Military)
    MERITORIOUS SERVICE MEDAL (MILITARY) To Foreign Officers 2012 to 2021 Updated: 22 May 2021 Current to: 04 July 2020 CG and CanForGen November 2020 #144/20 Pages: 41 Prepared By: John Blatherwick, CM, CStJ, OBC, CD, MD, FRCP(C), LLD(Hon) =================================================================================================== Page CG or CanForGen Name Rank Unit Decoration 26 27/04/2016a BALDUCCHI, Christophe Antoine Marie Captain French Navy – Attaché MSM 16 24/06/2015a BEAUREGARD, Douglas CPO US Navy – Cyber Support MSM 09 22/02/2014 BRIGGS II, Jack L. BGen US Air Force MSM 25 27/04/2016a BUSHONG, Paul VAdm US Navy MSM 16 24/06/2015a DOCKTER, Bryan Major US Air Force CC-130J MSM 41 17/12/2020cfg DODU, Petru Eduard Commander Romanian Air Force MSM 17 14/11/2015 DUBIE, Michael D. LGen US Air Force NORAD MSM 08 01/07/2013a HABIBI, Ahmad BGen Afghanistan Army MSM 13 20/02/2014a HABIB HESARI, Mohammad MGen Afghanistan Army Training MSM 28 17/06/2017 HARMON, Jessica Captain US Army MSM 02 08/12/2012 HAUSMANN, Jeffrey Allen Colonel US Air Force MSM 40 01/11/2020cfg HEISNER, Aslak Colonel German Amry – Mali MSM 20 14/11/2015 HYDE, Charles Kevin BGen US Air Force D/Cdr 1 CAD MSM 13 20/02/2014a KARIMI, Sher Mohammad General Afghanistan Army COS MSM 37 26/08/2019a KSOK, Kamil Captain Polish Army – Tank Cdr MSM 09 10/09/2013a LEONARD, Dene Major US Army MSM 12 22/02/2014 LITTERINI, Norman Peter Colonel US Army D/COS CEFC MSM 32 11/11/2018 MANSKE, Chad Thomas BGen US Air Force D/Cdr 1 CAD MSM 14 29/04/2014a MERCIER, Denis General French Air Force COS MSM 13 20/02/2014a MERZAHI, Sayed Sgt-Major Afghanistan Army MSM 03 08/12/2012 MILLER, Christopher D.
    [Show full text]