DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction Situation Overview: Ulang and Nasir Counties, Upper Nile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Situation Overview: Ulang and Nasir Counties, Upper Nile State, South Sudan January – March 2018 Introduction Map 1: Assessment coverage in Ulang and Ulang and Nasir Counties are both located in Figure 1: Proportion of assessed settlements Nasir Counties in January (A), February (B) the northeastern maize and cattle livelihood reporting IDP presence in Ulang and Nasir The first quarter of 2018 was characterised March 2018 (C) zone.2 Instead of providing individual analysis, Counties by episodes of insecurity in Nasir County and A figures throughout this situation overview are 79% 0 - 4.4% 69% Jonglei state that led to displacement into thus presented for an aggregate of the two Ulang County.1 Ahead of the lean season, 4.5 - 10% 51% C counties. which is expected to start in May, access to 11 - 20% 21 - 50% food remained stable and relatively high from 51 - 100% Population Movement and January to March 2018. Furthermore, shelter Assessed settlement 51+Jan69+Feb79Mar Displacement and WASH conditions improved seasonally B while protection concerns worsened in line with In the first quarter of 2018, two displacement calm but perceptions of insecurity persisted the reported insecurity. movements towards Ulang County were across the area. The episodes of conflict reported, both of which created challenges for in Jonglei State and Nasir County and the To inform the response of humanitarian actors food security among the displaced population. consequential influx of IDPs are underlined working outside of formal displacement sites, Thousands of Internally Displaced Persons by the increase in the proportion of assessed REACH has been conducting an assessment (IDPs) fleeing from conflict in Jonglei State settlements reporting presence of IDPs, from of hard-to-reach areas in South Sudan since reached Ulang County in two waves in February 51% in January, to 69% in February and 79% 2015, for which data on settlements across and March 2018.3 Most of the IDPs from Jonglei in March. Greater Upper Nile, Greater Equatoria and settled in areas near the state border. Many Western Bahr el Ghazal region is collected on The displacement movements coincided with reportedly arrived without any assets, suffered a monthly basis. seasonal cattle migration in the areas of Ulang from hunger and lacked adequate shelter.4 and Nasir Counties. During the dry season from From January to March 2018, REACH In Nasir County, sudden escalation of violence January until April of each year, cattle keepers interviewed 267 Key Informants (KIs) from 75 previous REACH assessments of hard-to-reach led to the displacement of thousands of people from parts of Jonglei State, such as Nyirol, settlements in Nasir and Ulang Counties in areas of Upper Nile State. in February 2018.5 Many of these IDPs fled to move into Upper Nile State to let their cattle Upper Nile State. All the KIs were interviewed This Situation Overview outlines displacement neighbouring Ulang County.6 Signs of severe graze along the fertile grounds of the Sobat in Akobo, Jonglei State. Findings have been and access to basic services in Ulang and Nasir hunger were reported among the arriving river. According to FGD participants, it is likely triangulated using one Focus Group Discussion Counties from January to March 2018. The first IDPs.7 An unreported number of people also that the previously mentioned displacement (FGDs) conducted in Akobo, Jonglei State section analyses displacement trends in these fled across the border to Ethiopia, as recorded of conflict-affected communities occurred in with KIs that had been displaced from Ulang two counties, and the second section evaluates by UNHCR refugee inflow data from January to parallel with the seasonal cattle migration.9 As and Nasir Counties, as well as with interviews access to food and basic services for both March 2018.8 From late February onwards, the in previous years, associated with this seasonal with humanitarian actors, secondary data, and displaced and non-displaced communities. situation in Nasir County generally remained migration, securing free movement for cattle : 1. IRNA, Ulang County, February-March 2018. 5. IRNA, Bitutgok Camp, March 2018. 2. FEWSNET, South Sudan Livelihood Zones, 2017. 6. MEDAIR, Ulang County WASH Assessment report, March-April 2018. 3. IRNA, Ulang County, February-March 2018. 7. IRNA, Bitutgok Camp, March 2018. 4. Ibid. 8. UNHCR, Ethiopia Factsheet January-March 2018. and access to pastures and water also poses attributable to food distributions by humanitarian and Nasir Counties is seasonal it is possible METHODOLOGY the risk for future conflict with other pastoralist actors. In March, 47% of assessed settlements that the amount of fish has decreased with the To provide an overview of the situation in communities. reported that the main source of food was progression of the dry season, when less fish is largely inaccessible areas of Upper Nile humanitarian food distributions, similar to 39% seasonally available. State, REACH uses primary data provided Situation in Assessed in February and a slight increase compared From January to March, between 97%- by key informants who have recently arrived, Settlements to the 34% in January. This is also reflected 100% of assessed settlements in Ulang and or receive regular information, from their pre- in the 49% of assessed settlements in March Food security and livelihoods Nasir Counties reported that people in their displacement location or “Area of Knowledge”. reporting having received food assistance communities possessed cattle, either near the Information for this overview was collected Trends, particularly for food security and within the previous three months. The second settlement or at pasture. Between 52%-61% from key informants in Akobo, Jonglei State. livelihoods, were generally similar across most often reported source of food was fishing of assessed settlements were furthermore After data collection was completed, all Ulang and Nasir Counties as both are located and hunting, reported by 22% of assessed reporting currently engaging in keeping livestock data was examined at the settlement level, in the northeastern maize and cattle livelihood settlements in January and 18% in February, 10 as a livelihood activity. As between 97% and and settlements were assigned the modal zone. The proportion of assessed settlements but only 4% in March. Many settlements in 100% of assessed settlements had physical response. When no consensus could be reporting adequate access to food remained Ulang and Nasir Counties are situated along the access to their cattle, most communities had found for a settlement, that settlement consistently high across Ulang and Nasir Sobat river and traditionally, fishing has been access to livestock providing an important was not included in reporting. Descriptive Counties with 68%, 70% and 72% of assessed an important source of food for people in the additional food source and products such as statistics and geospatial analysis were then settlements reporting adequate access to food area. In March, the second most often reported used to analyse the data. milk. in January, February and March, respectively. food source was cultivation, reported by 21% The data analysis was disaggregated at These proportions are on the same level as of assessed settlements across Nasir and Comparatively fewer assessed settlements the county level when at least 4.5% of the in October to December 2017, and high if Ulang Counties. This is likely a reflection of the reported that members of the community settlements of a county were assessed each compared to the countrywide average of 42%, vegetable harvest season, which tradtionally were engaging in agriculture for sustenance. month. In January, February and March 48% and 40% in January, February and March takes place in the first quarter of the year. In January, this was reported in only 44% of 2018, this threshold was attained for both respectively. assessed settlements. The proportion remained Trends in most commonly reported food Ulang and Nasir Counties. similarly low in February at 39%. By March, These relatively high levels of reported adequate sources are also mirrored in the most commonly Due to access constraints, which may impact the share had increased to 53% reflecting the access to food among the settlements assessed cited livelihood activities. Fishing and hunting coverage each month, some changes over vegetable harvest as well as land preparation in Ulang and Nasir Counties are potentially remained a common livelihood source in time reported in this situation overview might for crops, which traditionally happen around 90%, 70% and 47% of assessed settlements be due to variations in coverage Figure 2: Proportion of assessed settlements that time of the year.11 Please note that REACH is in the process reporting adequate access to food from in January, February and March, respectively. of establishing sustained data collection in January to March 2018 These proportions indicate that there has Only 12% to 30% of assessed settlements Upper Nile State. As a result, the current been a decrease in assessed settlements in reported casual labour as a livelihood 70% 72% coverage is limited. The conclusions drawn 68% which members of the community were fishing activity among members of their community 48% are therefore indicative of likely trends in 42% 40% and/or hunting. This is also reflected in the from January to March. This relatively low Ulang and Nasir Counties and do possibly not above described reduction between January prevalence of assessed settlements in Ulang capture the humanitarian situation in some of and March in the proportion of assessed and Nasir Counties reporting casual labour is the settlements worst affected by episodes of 68+Jan70+72Feb Mar 42+Jan48+40Feb Mar likely linked to the low market access in those settlements reporting fishing as the most two economically isolated counties, which limits violence. Ulang and Nasir counties Countrywide average common food source. Since fishing in Ulang 2 9. According to FGD participants from Upper Nile interviewed by REACH in Akobo, April 2018.
Recommended publications
  • Upper Nile State, South Sudan June 2017

    Upper Nile State, South Sudan June 2017

    Situation Overview: Upper Nile State, South Sudan June 2017 SUDAN Introduction previous REACH assessments of hard-to- presence returned to the averages from April reach areas of Upper Nile State. (22% June, 42% May, 28% April).1 This may Despite a potential respite in fighting in lower MANYO be indicative of the slowing of movement due This Situation Overview outlines displacement counties along the western bank, dispersed to the rainy season. Although fighting that took RENK and access to basic services in Upper Nile fighting and widespread displacements trends place in Panyikang and Fashoda appeared to in June 2017. The first section analyses continued into June and impeded the provision subside, clashes between armed groups armed displacement trends in Upper Nile State. of primary needs and access to basic services groups reportedly commenced in Manyo and The second section outlines the population for assessed settlements. Only 45% of assessed Renk Counties, causing the local population to MELUT dynamics in the assessed settlements, as well settlements reported adequate access to food flee across the border as well as to Renk Town.2 and half reported access to healthcare facilities as access to food and basic services for both FASHODA These clashes may have also contributed to across Upper Nile State, while the malnutrition, MABAN IDP and non-displaced communities. MALAKAL a lack of IDPs, with no assessed settlement malaria and cholera concerns reported in May PANYIKANG BALIET Baliet, Maban, Melut and Renk Counties had in Manyo reporting an IDP presence in June, continued into June. LONGOCHUK less than 5% settlement coverage (Map 1), compared to 50% in May.
  • The Crisis in South Sudan

    The Crisis in South Sudan

    Conflict in South Sudan and the Challenges Ahead Lauren Ploch Blanchard Specialist in African Affairs September 22, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43344 Conflict in South Sudan and the Challenges Ahead Summary South Sudan, which separated from Sudan in 2011 after almost 40 years of civil war, was drawn into a devastating new conflict in late 2013, when a political dispute that overlapped with preexisting ethnic and political fault lines turned violent. Civilians have been routinely targeted in the conflict, often along ethnic lines, and the warring parties have been accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The war and resulting humanitarian crisis have displaced more than 2.7 million people, including roughly 200,000 who are sheltering at U.N. peacekeeping bases in the country. Over 1 million South Sudanese have fled as refugees to neighboring countries. No reliable death count exists. U.N. agencies report that the humanitarian situation, already dire with over 40% of the population facing life-threatening hunger, is worsening, as continued conflict spurs a sharp increase in food prices. Famine may be on the horizon. Aid workers, among them hundreds of U.S. citizens, are increasingly under threat—South Sudan overtook Afghanistan as the country with the highest reported number of major attacks on humanitarians in 2015. At least 62 aid workers have been killed during the conflict, and U.N. experts warn that threats are increasing in scope and brutality. In August 2015, the international community welcomed a peace agreement signed by the warring parties, but it did not end the conflict.
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria

    Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria

    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
  • AREA-BASED ASSESSMENT in AREAS of RETURN OCTOBER 2019 Renk Town, Renk County, Upper Nile State, South Sudan

    AREA-BASED ASSESSMENT in AREAS of RETURN OCTOBER 2019 Renk Town, Renk County, Upper Nile State, South Sudan

    AREA-BASED ASSESSMENT IN AREAS OF RETURN OCTOBER 2019 Renk Town, Renk County, Upper Nile State, South Sudan CONTEXT ASSESSED LOCATION Renk Town is located in Renk County, Upper Nile State, near South Sudan’s border SUDAN Girbanat with Sudan. Since the formation of South Sudan in 2011, Renk Town has been a major Gerger ± MANYO Renk transit point for returnees from Sudan and, since the beginning of the current conflict in Wadakona 1 2013, for internally displaced people (IDPs) fleeing conflict in Upper Nile State. RENK Renk was classified by the Integrated Phase Classification (IPC) Analysis Workshop El-Galhak Kurdit Umm Brabit in August 2019 as Phase 4 ‘Emergency’ with 50% of the population in either Phase 3 Nyik Marabat II 2 Kaka ‘Crisis’ (65,997 individuals) or Phase ‘4’ Emergency’ (28,284 individuals). Additionally, MELUT Renk was classified as Phase 5 ‘Extremely Critical’ for Global Acute Malnutrition MABAN (GAM),3 suggesting the prevalence of acute malnutrition was above the World Health Kumchuer Organisation (WHO) recommended emergency threshold with a recent REACH Multi- Suraya Hai Sector Needs Assessment (MSNA) establishing a GAM of above 30%.4 A measles Soma outbreak was declared in June 2019 and access to clean water was reportedly limited, as flagged by the Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) and by international NGOs 4 working on the ground. Hai Marabat I Based on the convergence of these factors causing high levels of humanitarian Emtitad Jedit Musefin need and the possibility for larger-scale returns coming to Renk County from Sudan, REACH conducted this Area-Based Assessment (ABA) in order to better understand White Hai Shati the humanitarian conditions in, and population movement dynamics to and from, Renk N e l Town.
  • The Greater Pibor Administrative Area

    The Greater Pibor Administrative Area

    35 Real but Fragile: The Greater Pibor Administrative Area By Claudio Todisco Copyright Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva 2015 First published in March 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organi- zation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Publications Manager, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. Small Arms Survey Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Maison de la Paix, Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2E, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Series editor: Emile LeBrun Copy-edited by Alex Potter ([email protected]) Proofread by Donald Strachan ([email protected]) Cartography by Jillian Luff (www.mapgrafix.com) Typeset in Optima and Palatino by Rick Jones ([email protected]) Printed by nbmedia in Geneva, Switzerland ISBN 978-2-940548-09-5 2 Small Arms Survey HSBA Working Paper 35 Contents List of abbreviations and acronyms .................................................................................................................................... 4 I. Introduction and key findings ..............................................................................................................................................
  • Map of South Sudan

    Map of South Sudan

    UNITED NATIONS SOUTH SUDAN Geospatial 25°E 30°E 35°E Nyala Ed Renk Damazin Al-Fula Ed Da'ein Kadugli SUDAN Umm Barbit Kaka Paloich Ba 10°N h Junguls r Kodok Āsosa 10°N a Radom l-A Riangnom UPPER NILEBoing rab Abyei Fagwir Malakal Mayom Bentiu Abwong ^! War-Awar Daga Post Malek Kan S Wang ob Wun Rog Fangak at o Gossinga NORTHERN Aweil Kai Kigille Gogrial Nasser Raga BAHR-EL-GHAZAL WARRAP Gumbiel f a r a Waat Leer Z Kuacjok Akop Fathai z e Gambēla Adok r Madeir h UNITY a B Duk Fadiat Deim Zubeir Bisellia Bir Di Akobo WESTERN Wau ETHIOPIA Tonj Atum W JONGLEI BAHR-EL-GHAZAL Wakela h i te LAKES N Kongor CENTRAL Rafili ile Peper Bo River Post Jonglei Pibor Akelo Rumbek mo Akot Yirol Ukwaa O AFRICAN P i Lol b o Bor r Towot REPUBLIC Khogali Pap Boli Malek Mvolo Lowelli Jerbar ^! National capital Obo Tambura Amadi WESTERN Terakeka Administrative capital Li Yubu Lanya EASTERN Town, village EQUATORIAMadreggi o Airport Ezo EQUATORIA 5°N Maridi International boundary ^! Juba Lafon Kapoeta 5°N Undetermined boundary Yambio CENTRAL State (wilayah) boundary EQUATORIA Torit Abyei region Nagishot DEMOCRATIC Roue L. Turkana Main road (L. Rudolf) Railway REPUBLIC OF THE Kajo Yei Opari Lofusa 0 100 200km Keji KENYA o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 50 100mi CONGO o e The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
  • Country Profile – Ethiopia

    Country Profile – Ethiopia

    Country profile – Ethiopia Version 2016 Recommended citation: FAO. 2016. AQUASTAT Country Profile – Ethiopia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].
  • The Republic of South Sudan Request for an Extension of the Deadline For

    The Republic of South Sudan Request for an Extension of the Deadline For

    The Republic of South Sudan Request for an extension of the deadline for completing the destruction of Anti-personnel Mines in mined areas in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 1 of the convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Antipersonnel Mines and on Their Destruction Submitted at the 18th Meeting of the State Parties Submitted to the Chair of the Committee on Article 5 Implementation Date 31 March 2020 Prepared for State Party: South Sudan Contact Person : Jurkuch Barach Jurkuch Position: Chairperson, NMAA Phone : (211)921651088 Email : [email protected] 1 | Page Contents Abbreviations 3 I. Executive Summary 4 II. Detailed Narrative 8 1 Introduction 8 2 Origin of the Article 5 implementation challenge 8 3 Nature and extent of progress made: Decisions and Recommendations of States Parties 9 4 Nature and extent of progress made: quantitative aspects 9 5 Complications and challenges 16 6 Nature and extent of progress made: qualitative aspects 18 7 Efforts undertaken to ensure the effective exclusion of civilians from mined areas 21 # Anti-Tank mines removed and destroyed 24 # Items of UXO removed and destroyed 24 8 Mine Accidents 25 9 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: quantitative aspects 27 10 The Disaggregation of Current Contamination 30 11 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: qualitative aspects 41 12 Circumstances that impeded compliance during previous extension period 43 12.1 Humanitarian, economic, social and environmental implications of the
  • UPPER NILE Yaa

    UPPER NILE Yaa

    SOUTH SUDAN Maban County reference map SUDAN ETHIOPIA Renk CAR DRC KENYA El Haragis UGANDA Khantioq Wakhlet Waqfet Kaddah Dema Hawaga Zurzur Kudda Korpar Zarzor Es Sida Ban Kaala Abu Khamirah Al Amin SUDAN Ban Burka Dar As Saqiyah Ban Tami Sa`dan Wad Tabir Dudu Ban Yaawin Jantoka Ballilah Derib Jungara Abu Daqn Guffa Ban Toltukke Mardi Abu Diqn Nushur Dinka Degeis Danga Kagyana Aqordit Harbi Cholei Sheikh Bade Ban Tollog Melut Abd Er Rigal Khawr Tunbak Awag El Bagar Banwiir Jemaam Faraj Allah A Tunguls Dhomat Nyeda Fadlull Alkedwa Junguls Nyanya Bumma Junquator Byam Bendingo Falakah Abu Kot Nurah Kunjila Kaya Dido Dzhantoqa Yusuf Natcha Nila Feyqa Tuyo Quffah Adar Kaluang Kanshur Bankeka Ukka Kanje Yelqu Feika Tagga Makajiongo Yusuf Batil Bir Talta Gendrassa Bang Allah Jabu Qadiga Bunj Agyagya Ballah Dinga Marinja Tumma Kannah Liti Gumma Khadiga Maban Dima Dangaji Baliet Nyang Ghanga Liang UPPER NILE Yaa Tungyu Keiwa Maundi Bella Bugaya Deingo Chidu Beneshowa Abmju Moibar Swamp Sonca Boac International boundary State boundary County boundary Undetermined boundary Abyei region Country capital Longochuk Administrative centre/County capital Principal town Secondary town Chotbora Village Primary road Luakpiny/NasirSecondary road Tertiary road Main river 0 5 10 km The administrative boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Final boundary between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan has not yet been determined. Final status of Abyei area is not yet determined. Created: March 2020 | Code: SS-7105 | Sources: OCHA, SSNBS | Feedback: [email protected] | unocha.org/south-sudan | reliefweb.int/country/ssd | southsudan.humanitarianresponse.info .
  • National Education Statistics

    National Education Statistics

    2016 NATIONAL EDUCATION STATISTICS FOR THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN FEBRUARY 2017 www.goss.org © Ministry of General Education & Instruction 2017 Photo Courtesy of UNICEF This publication may be used as a part or as a whole, provided that the MoGEI is acknowledged as the source of information. The map used in this document is not the official maps of the Republic of South Sudan and are for illustrative purposes only. This publication has been produced with financial assistance from the Global Partnership for Education (GPE) and technical assistance from Altai Consulting. Soft copies of the complete National and State Education Statistic Booklets, along with the EMIS baseline list of schools and related documents, can be accessed and downloaded at: www.southsudanemis.org. For inquiries or requests, please use the following contact information: George Mogga / Director of Planning and Budgeting / MoGEI [email protected] Giir Mabior Cyerdit / EMIS Manager / MoGEI [email protected] Data & Statistics Unit / MoGEI [email protected] Nor Shirin Md. Mokhtar / Chief of Education / UNICEF [email protected] Akshay Sinha / Education Officer / UNICEF [email protected] Daniel Skillings / Project Director / Altai Consulting [email protected] Philibert de Mercey / Senior Methodologist / Altai Consulting [email protected] FOREWORD On behalf of the Ministry of General Education and Instruction (MoGEI), I am delighted to present The National Education Statistics Booklet, 2016, of the Republic of South Sudan (RSS). It is the 9th in a series of publications initiated in 2006, with only one interruption in 2014, a significant achievement for a new nation like South Sudan. The purpose of the booklet is to provide a detailed compilation of statistical information covering key indicators of South Sudan’s education sector, from ECDE to Higher Education.
  • Upper Nile State SOUTH SUDAN

    Upper Nile State SOUTH SUDAN

    COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Upper Nile State SOUTH SUDAN Bureau for Community Security South Sudan Peace and Small Arms Control and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands The Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control under the Ministry of Interior is the Gov- ernment agency of South Sudan mandated to address the threats posed by the proliferation of small arms and community insecurity to peace and development. The South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission is mandated to promote peaceful co-existence amongst the people of South Sudan and advises the Government on matters related to peace. The United Nations Development Programme in South Sudan, through the Community Security and Arms Control Project, supports the Bureau strengthen its capacity in the area of community security and arms control at the national, state and county levels. The consultation process was led by the Government of South Sudan, with support from the Govern- ment of the Netherlands’ Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Cover photo: A senior chief from Upper Nile. © UNDP/Sun-ra Lambert Baj COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Upper Nile State South Sudan Published by South Sudan Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme MAY 2012 JUBA, SOUTH SUDAN CONTENTS Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... i Foreword ..........................................................................................................................
  • The Water Resources of the Nile Basin

    The Water Resources of the Nile Basin

    Chapter 2 The Water Resources of the Nile Basin 500 Soroti (1914–2003) 400 300 200 100 Average monthly rainfall 0 JFMAMJ JASOND 25 KEY MESSAGES • The Nile Basin is characterized by high climatic • The headwater regions of the Nile are subject diversity and variability, a low percentage of rainfall to widespread soil erosion. Sediment yields are reaching the main river, and an uneven distribution particularly high in the Eastern Nile sub-basin, of its water resources. Potential evaporation rates which contributes 97 per cent of the total sediment in the Nile region are high, making the basin load. Most sediment is captured in reservoirs in The particularly vulnerable to drought. Sudan and Egypt, which leads to a rapid loss of • White Nile flows only contribute up to 15 per cent reservoir storage capacity. of the annual Nile discharge, but are fairly stable • The finite Nile flows are now fully utilized for throughout the year. The Eastern Nile region agricultural, domestic, industrial, and environmental supplies up to 90 per cent of annual Nile flows, but purposes, while water demand continues to rise its contribution is highly seasonal. steadily due to population growth and economic • Extensive regional aquifer systems holding development. substantial quantities of groundwater underlie the • Irrigated agriculture in Egypt and The Sudan Nile region. Some of the aquifers hold fossil water, represents the single most important consumer but others are recharged from precipitation over of the waters of the Nile, but the upper riparians the basin, or from irrigation areas and the baseflow are planning investments that will use the river’s of the Nile.