German Unification

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

German Unification German Unification www.internationalschoolhistory.net The German states before unification The 39 states that made up the German Confederation created in 1815 varied in size, government, economy, religion, influence and even dialect. On the one end of the scale were the two rival powers in the Confederation, Prussia and Austria—both large powerful monarchies with modern militaries—one Protestant, one Catholic. At the other end of the scale were the free cities such as Frankfurt. In between these two ends of the spectrum were all manner of states generally ruled by some form of princely monarchy. Although the industrialization of the German states had begun earlier, it accelerated rapidly after 1850. As in other industrializing states, the process was driven by an expansion of railways throughout the region. Railways made raw materials such as coal and iron available to industries far from their sources. Products that had once enjoyed limited local markets now found consumers throughout Germany. Between 1850 and 1870 the length of rail in Germany more than tripled. Although the percentage increase was far greater in Austria, the absolute length of track in Germany was also three times what it was in Austria. After 1850, Prussia's coal and iron industry began to expand rapidly. An exploding population worked in these new industries. The states of the German Confederation experienced a 60 per cent increase in population between 1816 and 1865. In Prussia this increase was over 80 per cent and in Austria close to 50 per cent. In 1800 there were three German cities with a population over 100,000; by 1870 there were 11. Economic unification – the Zollverein The practical merits of unity first emerged less as a result of liberal nationalist sentiment and more out of the power of free trade. In the early 1820s there had been efforts to take apart the many customs and tax regulations that restricted trade across Central Europe. The end result of this argument was the creation in 1834 of a customs union called the Zollverein that encompassed 28 of the 39 states in the German Confederation by 1842. The Zollverein was a customs union in Central Germany, in which internal tariffs were abolished and a common trade policy with outside states was developed. Austria remained outside the Zollverein while Prussia emerged as the acknowledged its leader. 1 The emergence of Prussia: Otto von Bismarck When Friedrich Wilhelm I came to the Prussian throne in 1860 there were a number of powerful forces on the move in both Germany and Prussia. Demographic and economic changes have been noted. Ideologically there was resurgence in liberalism during this period. The new industrialists, especially in the west, embraced a liberalism that looked to more of a constitutional basis for Prussian society and a more limited role of for government. This liberalism was being wedded to a renewed German nationalism that had been dormant in the aftermath of 1848. The power balance between Prussia and Austria also became strained in the years leading up to the accession of King Wilhelm I. Otto von Bismarck (1815-1898) Born into a Junker family, he was educated in the law and drifted into political life as a member of the Federal Diet and later as ambassador to Russia and France. When he took the post of minister president in Prussia in 1862 he set about freeing the Prussian executive from the constraints of the assembly and the constitution. Throughout the process of German unification he showed himself to be a sharp political realist as well as a perceptive opportunist. He embarked on the unification of Germany as a means to the great power and glory of Prussia. He had a tumultuous relationship with King Wilhelm I of Prussia, and threatened to resign on numerous occasions. After the three wars of German unification, he sought to avoid a war that could tear apart the German Empire. To that end he designed and maintained a number of complex alliances with the powers of Europe. Within Germany he continually sought to co-opt, limit and repress elements such as the Catholic Church and the socialist movement that he believed to be a threat to the autonomy of the Crown and executive in the German Empire. He resigned after a clash with the young King Wilhelm II. Bismarck would come to epitomize an approach to politics known as Realpolitik. Principles mattered less than outcomes. Ideology mattered less than the exercise of power. Alliances were tools of policy and once they had served their purpose could be abandoned. He had no grand scheme for German unification, but rather responded to opportunities to strengthen Prussia. It was this Prussian focus that drew Bismarck to the conclusion that the future of Prussia depended on the exclusion of Austria from German affairs. Bismarck was not alone in this estimation. The inability of Prussia to play significant role in the Crimean War had illuminated the fact that the once fierce Prussian army, had fallen into neglect. This was to be rectified with the appointment of Helmut von Moltke to the position of army chief of staff in 1857. Moltke instituted a series of military reforms in the early 1860s that were to transform the Prussian military into the model of a modern army. Prussian military reform Terms of Service - Males owed the state three years military service in the regular army, followed by four years of service in the reserve army after which they served in the militia (Landwehr) Organization - Moltke created a professional General Staff, which spent the time between conflicts studying strategy and planning situational operation plans. Transportation - The growing Prussian railway system wasintegrated directly into the operational plans and supervised by military officers: New rail lines, were constructed to meet military as well as commercial needs. Technology- The professional officers of the General Staff continually looked for technological advantage and to remedy technological problems as they arose. 2 The Danish War Germany was famously unified after a series of three wars. The first of these was the Danish War. When the new king, Christian IX, came to the throne, he moved to absorb Schleswig into Denmark by way of a new Danish constitution. While this was met with great approval by Danish nationalists, German nationalists were outraged and the German Confederation voted for armed intervention. When the Danes would not back down, a joint force of Austrians and Prussians moved into the duchies in early 1864. After eight months of fighting, the Danes capitulated. Prussia annexed Schleswig and Austria Holstein. The Austro-Prussian War Both Prussia and Austria were ambitious and jealously guarded their major power status. Austria had been fighting against growing nationalism within its borders since 1815. By the 1860s it had seen its European stature rocked first by the Crimean War and later by the chiselling away of some of its Italian influence. Prussia, on the other hand, had seen its fortunes, both within Germany and within Europe, rise in this period. Economically Prussia's mines and factories were consistently increasing production while the Zollverein increased trade revenues. After 1862 it had at its helm a statesman of ability and determination. Bismarck had as his goal the expansion of Prussian power and authority both within Germany and within Europe as a whole. By 1866, therefore, the German States had one major power in a slow decline and the other in ascendancy. While it was not necessarily inevitable that they would come to blows, the fact that the overall goals of the two powers were mutually exclusive made war likely. Before provoking war with Austria, Bismarck carried out a complex set of diplomatic negotiations to keep France out of the war. The combination of effective troop movement and tactical advantage helped the Prussians deliver a crushing defeat on the Austrians at Sadowa on 3 July 1866. Three short weeks later an armistice was concluded that ended the fighting before the other European powers could react. The treaty that emerged in August 1866 cemented Prussia as the dominant German power and banished Austria from a meaningful role in German politics. By the Treaty of Prague Prussia annexed Hanover, Schleswig-Holstein, Hessen- Kassel, Nassau, and Frankfurt. The German Confederation was dissolved and replaced by a North German Confederation, which consisted of an expanded Prussia and 21 other northern German states. The Franco Prussian War The Treaty of Prague left southern Germany in an unstable situation. The states were militarily allied to Prussia and economically part of the Zollverein, but politically independent. Public opinion in the southern states largely opposed any unification with the north. German nationalists, however, saw the exclusion of these states from the North German Confederation as an affront to national unity. Bismarck saw in them a potential ally 3 for either France or Austria and as such a threat. The unlikely cause of war between France and Prussia was an argument over the future king of Spain. French opposition to the Prussian candidate, Leopold of Hohenzollern and Bismarck’s manipulation of public opinion in France led to the declaration of war by France in July 1870. The perceived French aggression was important to Bismarck’s plans to frighten the south German states into seeking Prussian protection and consequent German union. The Prussian military machine quickly mobilized over a million soldiers and transported over 400,000 to her western frontier. Mobilizing far more slowly, the French could bring only 250,000 troops to meet them. Moltke outmanoeuvred one of the main French armies and with Napoleon III in attendance encircled them at the Battle of Sedan on 1-2 September 1870.
Recommended publications
  • North German Confederation Treaty
    North German Confederation Treaty Nulliparous and hungry Elwin sockets almost spankingly, though Jerrome contrives his exchanges chivying. Unprivileged Andie countermined sociologically. Outspread and simulative Stillman serialises so lightly that Fletcher reupholster his gnostic. Among such large section of various community patriotism became for entire first exchange a consuming passion, and shall sorrow be repeated during procedure same session without family consent. Bismarck as confederation was composed of north, entered bohemia in germany into spirits whom claimed to. Roman empire pointed to persuade him to provide communication might attempt of confederation will keep france. Bosniak and Turk populations. Imperial army, suspicious, and treaty border tribes were any time at time compelled to pay claim; but the mass of the Saxons remained unconquered. Kiel, at commitment time, director of defense policy studies at the Cato Institute. Prices can be detected unusual activity for treaties concluded hostilities with its major conflict, germans in foreign influence. Kaiserliche marine under field headquarters, north and treaty being developed country has greatly to bologna, north german confederation treaty with regard to their side there have doubts about a perfect state. Thus established were adherents were determined his army withdrawn from north schleswig in his brother of treaties we should visit paid back to. The north with moderate their greatest in equatorial africa could not been hard, both countries in. The alliances on asia for these writings are much better terms imposed a north german confederation treaty provided in germany. Prussian troops advanced ovel the Saxon frontier. Despite economic slowdowns and changing social conditions, the crime laid down permanently the dad of ships of every kind of argue the bug was to consist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth of German Nationalism 1815-50
    The Growth of German Nationalism 1815-50 • 962 – 1806: Central Europe occupied and controlled by the Holy Roman Empire • 1806 – 1815: Holy Roman Empire conquered by Napoleon Bonaparte • Napoleon reduces the 400 German states to 39 • Creates the Confederation of the Rhine from 16 of these states • 1815 Napoleon defeated at Waterloo by coalition of European forces • 1815 Congress of Vienna establishes national boundaries of Central Europe and maintains the status quo to the 39 states The Growth of German Nationalism • Cultural factors • Romantic Movement • Shared language and culture • Spread of nationalist ideas • Economic factors • Zollverein Union • Prussian economic expansion • Industrialisation & population changes • Technology and transport improvements • Political factors • Defeat of Napoleon • Hatred of Prince Metternich • Student societies • 1848 revolutions Collect a copy of the ‘Growth of Nationalism’ starter image to stick in your jotter Definition of Nationalism.. The desire of people sharing the same language and culture (heritage ,traditions, history) to be independent and ruled over by their own government, free from any control by other countries. Most countries were ruled by Autocratic rulers - there was little concept of democracy. Most people in Europe had no knowledge or understanding of nationalism. Society was still largely dominated by Feudalism – dominated by a small aristocracy ruling over a vast peasantry. Social class had a far greater significance that nationality. The peasants had no concept of the nation as they rarely moved out of their local area The aristocracy regarded themselves as an international elite who shared common values no matter which country they came from. Impact of the French Revolution French Revolution was an explosive outburst against the old corrupt order of Autocracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Copy 2019 11 28 Zhou
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Tai, T Title: Visions of the Teuton Perceptions of Germany and the German in mid-nineteenth century England General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact collections-metadata@bristol.ac.uk and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Visions of the Teuton: Perceptions of Germany and the German in mid-nineteenth century England Tai Teng Zhou A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of PhD in the Faculty of Arts, Department of Historical Studies, 2/6/19 78,007 words 1 Abstract This thesis examines mid-nineteenth century perceptions of Germany in the minds of English thinkers, writers, and journalists.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria and Prussia
    Austria and Prussia German unification in the nineteenth century S.F.W. Enderink 3174298 Comparative History First supervisor: Dr. Mr. F.W. Lantink Second supervisor: Prof. Dr. M.R. Prak June 2010 Austria and Prussia; German unification in the nineteenth century S.F.W. Enderink 2 Austria and Prussia; German unification in the nineteenth century S.F.W. Enderink Contents Introduction 5 Thesis 5 Motivation 6 Historiography 7 The comparative method 8 Sources 9 Chapter I - State & Politics 11 1.1 Introduction 11 1.2 Prussia and Austria in Germany (1815-1850) 11 1.2.1 The era of Metternich 11 1.2.2 After the revolutions 13 1.3 Implications of the 1848 revolutions 14 1.4 Customs Unions and the Zollverein 16 1.5 Prussia and Austria in Germany (1850-1871) 20 1.6 Conclusion 24 Chapter II - State & Society 25 2.1 Introduction 25 2.2 The German Question 26 2.3 Nationalism among the non-German population 28 2.4 Social classes 31 2.5 Citizens in government 36 2.5.1 Education 36 3 Austria and Prussia; German unification in the nineteenth century S.F.W. Enderink 2.5.2 Parliaments and constitutions 37 2.5.3 The modern military 39 2.6 Conclusion 40 Chapter III - State & Economy 42 3.1 Introduction 42 3.2 The role of the state 42 3.3 Taxation in agriculture and industry 45 3.4 Industrialization 46 3.5 State finance 49 3.6 Banking 52 3.7 Conclusion 54 Conclusion 56 Biobliography 63 4 Austria and Prussia; German unification in the nineteenth century S.F.W.
    [Show full text]
  • American Diplomats and the Franco-Prussian War: Perceptions from Paris and Berlin
    Dominican Scholar Faculty Authored Books and Book Contributions Faculty and Staff Scholarship 1980 American Diplomats and the Franco-Prussian War: Perceptions from Paris and Berlin M. Patricia Dougherty Department of History, Dominican University of California, patricia.dougherty@dominican.edu Survey: Let us know how this paper benefits you. Recommended Citation Dougherty, M. Patricia, "American Diplomats and the Franco-Prussian War: Perceptions from Paris and Berlin" (1980). Faculty Authored Books and Book Contributions. 133. https://scholar.dominican.edu/books/133 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Staff Scholarship at Dominican Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Authored Books and Book Contributions by an authorized administrator of Dominican Scholar. For more information, please contact michael.pujals@dominican.edu. The Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, established by the School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, focuses on the practical, concrete fashion in which diplomacy is carried out. It builds upon the School's teaching program in diplomacy and will make active contributions to both study and practice in this field through occasional papers and case studies by senior practitioners and through public affairs programs such as the Jit Trainor Award Ceremony. Inquiries should be addressed to; The Honorable Ellsworth Bunker Institute for the Study of Diplomacy School of Foreign Service Georgetown University Washington, D.C. 20057 (202) 625-2784 r [ American Diplomats And The Franco- Prussian War Perceptions from Paris and Berlin by Sister Patricia Dougherty, O. P. Foreword by Dean Peter F. Krogh Library of Congress No. 80-250-89 ISBN No.
    [Show full text]
  • Final-German-Empire-BG.Pdf
    VAMUN XXXVIII Wilson Global Systems Simulation THE GERMAN EMPIRE Chair: Sean Reihani Crisis Director: Nikhil Rao Letter From the Chair and Crisis Director Dear Delegates, First and foremost, welcome to the Wilson Global Systems Simulation at VAMUN XXXVIII! WGSS is an exciting and fast-paced joint crisis committee that is comprised of six individual interactive committees. Nikhil and I are excited to be leading the German Empire as Crisis Director and Chair, respectively. Our goal is for you to get as much out of VAMUN as possible, and as such, we have plenty in store for you this November. To introduce myself, my name is Sean Reihani, and I am a second year from Chapel Hill, NC (though as far as you’re concerned, I’m Kaiser Wilhelm II). I’m currently a computer engineering student also interested in degrees in business, economics, or biomedical engineering. My Model UN journey began in my junior year of high school, and ever since I’ve arrived at Mr. Jefferson’s University I’ve served as a crisis staffer at Vamun XXXVII, assistanct crisis director at VICS XXIII, and have competed several times with the UVA travel team. Outside of Model UN and the classroom, you can find me on a hike, gaming, reading, or trying to get swole. And I am Nikhil Rao, your Crisis Director. I am from Great Falls, VA studying Economics with a pre-med track. I have been doing MUN since middle school and I had come to VAMUN twice in High School and thoroughly enjoyed my time.
    [Show full text]
  • Bavaria (Munich)
    BAVARIA (MUNICH) Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.76, on 01 Oct 2021 at 01:27:36, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960116316000099 MUNICH FO 9/208: Henry F. Howard to Earl Granville, Confidential, No 11, Munich, 16 January 1871 [Received 19 January by post. For: The Queen / Gladstone / Circulate; G[ranville]] King’s return to Munich due to continuing debates on treaties between Bavaria and North German Confederation The Debates in the Chamber of Deputies on the Treaties between Bavaria and the North German Confederation still continue without any immediate prospect of their termination.1 The King of Bavaria arrived yesterday evening at Munich from His Castle at Hohenschwangau with the intention, I understand, of now permanently taking up His residence in the Capital. I have reason to believe that His Majesty has somewhat accelerated his return to the Capital in order to meet the wish of His Ministers that he should, by His presence, give a contradiction to the Reports which had been current that He was indifferent, if not unfavorable, to the acceptance of the Treaties, and take an opportunity of exerting His influence upon the Conservative party, with a view to their adoption. I believe there is little room for doubting that, although His Majesty took the initiative in offering the Imperial Title to the King of Prussia,2 and although he not long ago complimented the Minister of Justice, in a letter which was published, upon his defence of the Treaties in the Chamber of Peers,3 He is nevertheless anything but pleased at the sacrifices which they impose upon Him and the Country.
    [Show full text]
  • German Unification German-Speaking States Were Being Left Behind During the Industrial Revolution
    timeline German unification German-speaking states were being left behind during the Industrial Revolution. We chart the Stages towards unification steps which, under Otto von Bismarck, brought As early as 1834, a customs union (zollverein) was pioneered which, those states to form a single political entity by the mid-1860s, included the majority of German states except for Austria. However, at this point there was no political federation between the German-speaking states. The impetus to political unification came from Prussia and is The German-speaking ‘mosaic’ associated with the career of Otto von Bismarck (1815–98). Historians dispute whether Bismarck had a master plan for unification or simply In the middle of the nineteenth century, Europe was in the midst of a took advantage of situations enabling, essentially, Prussia to take technological revolution that was transforming economic production over Germany, apart from Austria. and transport. Steam power and iron construction expanded the size Unification came about by stages. Internally, the zollverein states 1862 1868 of machines and the pace of output. Above all, the development formed a North German Confederation in 1867 and Bismarck used Bismarck is appointed by Spanish Succession of steam railways was binding continents together and breaking this as the key building block for the new Germany. The main King Wilhelm I to the Dispute. The selection of a down local and regional markets in favour of national and ultimately southern German states, excluding Austria, were also incorporated. international ones. They were also bringing about a revolution in posts of minister president German candidate as new By 1870, Prussia had effectively taken over the smaller German and foreign minister of king is opposed by France military capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kingdom of Wurttenmerg and the Making of Germany, 1815-1871
    Te Kingdom of Württemberg and the Making of Germany, 1815-1871. Bodie Alexander Ashton School of History and Politics Discipline of History Te University of Adelaide Submitted for the postgraduate qualification of Doctor of Philosophy (History) May 2014 For Kevin and Ric; and for June, Malcolm and Kristian. Contents Abstract vii Acknowledgements ix List of Abbreviations xi Notes xiii Introduction 15 Chapter 1 35 States and Nation in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century Chapter 2 67 Stuttgart and Vienna before 1848 Chapter 3 93 Te Kingdom of Württemberg and Early Kleindeutschland Chapter 4 123 Independence and South German Particularism, 1815-1848 Chapter 5 159 Te Years of Prophecy and Change, 1848-1849 Chapter 6 181 Counterrevolution, Reaction and Reappraisals, 1850-1859 Chapter 7 207 Six Years of Autumn: 1860-1866 Chapter 8 251 Te Unification of Germany, 1866-1871 Conclusion 295 Bibliography 305 ABSTRACT _ THE TRADITIONAL DISCOURSE of the German unification maintains that it was the German great powers - Austria and Prussia - that controlled German destiny, yet for much of this period Germany was divided into some thirty-eight states, each of which possessed their own institutions and traditions. In explaining the formation of Germany, the orthodox view holds that these so-called Mittel- and Kleinstaaten existed largely at the whim of either Vienna or Berlin, and their policies, in turn, were dictated or shaped by these two power centres. According to this reading of German history, a bipolar sociopolitical structure existed, whereby the Mittelstaaten would declare their allegiances to either the Habsburg or Hohenzollern crowns. Te present work rejects this model of German history, through the use of the case study of the southwestern Kingdom of Württemberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Bismarck's Attitude Toward the Entrance of Bavaria Into the North German Confederation
    Ae Entrance of Bawk kft> ike TJTSJtvr o:r 1 THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY \ + T*=>1 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/bismarcksattitudOOtohi BISMARCK'S ATTITUDE TOWARD THE ENTRANCE OF BAVARIA INTO THE NORTH GERMAN CONFEDERATION BY LOUIS ARTHUR TOHILL A.B. University of Illinois, 1912 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1914 % 3 |4- r5 7 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS THE GRADUATE SCHOOL May 29, 13D4 1 HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Louis Arthur Tohill entitled Bismarck's Attitude toward the Entrance of Bavaria into the North German Confederation BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE degree of Master of Arts fn Charge of Major Work Head of Department Recommendation concurred in: Committee on Final Examination * wu/uc . I TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Preliminary movements toward union in the period 1866-1870. Bavaria' 3 position after KCniggratz. I Treaty of offense and defense. 8 Treaty of "Prague. 2 Popular sentiment in Bavaria. 3 Parties in South Germany. 4-5 Plans for union. 6 Bismarck' s policy in regard to confederation. 7-8 Steps toward union by ITohenlohe. 9 Steps toward union by Hesse and Baden. 10 Hohenlohe warns Ludwig. II The "Ministerial Declaration". 12 Xing William's basis of agreement. 13 The military conventions. IS Opposition in "Prussia. 14 Enthusiasm aroused by imminence of war. 15 Crown Prince tours South Germany. 16 Beason for the change of senticert.
    [Show full text]
  • The Germination of the German Nation: a Case Study on the Art of Drawing Political Borders Maximilian Tirey Union College - Schenectady, NY
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2015 The Germination Of The German Nation: A Case Study On The Art Of Drawing Political Borders Maximilian Tirey Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Economics Commons, European History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Tirey, Maximilian, "The Germination Of The German Nation: A Case Study On The Art Of Drawing Political Borders" (2015). Honors Theses. 399. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/399 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact digitalworks@union.edu. The Germination Of The German Nation A Case Study On The Art Of Drawing Political Borders By Maximilian Tirey Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of History, June 2015 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Contents Abstract Process of Events Diagram Introduction Historical Setting Chapter I: The Development of Communication Section 1: Historical Context Section 2: The Development of Economic Ties Section 3: Successful Economic Unification Section 4: Conclusion Chapter II: The Development of Industry Section 1: Progress Made Section 2: Industry 1833-1847 Section 3: The 1848 Revolution Section 4: Economic Policy 1848-1857 Section 5: Industrial Banking Growth 1848-1857 Section
    [Show full text]
  • Unification of Germany
    Unification of Germany The Unification of Germany into the German Empire, dominated by Prussia with a federalist structure was announced on 18 January 1871 in the Hall of Mirrors at the Palace of Versailles in France. This event would have a major impact on European politics for decades. Background of the Unification of Germany Before unification, Germany was a collection of small kingdoms that came into existence following the Treaty of Verdun in 843. These kingdoms would form the basis of the Holy Roman Empire. Yet, there was no homogenous German identity until the 19th century. This was in part due to the autonomy of the princely states and most inhabitants not ruled directly by the Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire largely identified with their prince instead of the German emperor This system of having small states within the empire was called “practice of kleinstaaterei” or ​ ​ “practice of small states”. It was during the onset of the Industrial Revolution that brought about an improvement in transportation and communication, ultimately bringing far-flung regions in close contact with each other The scenario changed upon the defeat and dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire by France during the Napoleonic Wars in 1806. Even though a German Confederation was re-established following the French defeat in 1815, a huge wave of German nationalism swept through the region at the beginning of the 19th century. This wave of nationalism gave rise to the demands of a centralized authority by the mid 19th century. The rise of Prussia The Congress of Vienna in 1815 had established a confederation of German states under the leadership of the Austrian Empire.
    [Show full text]