Ccooonnnttteeennntttss

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ccooonnnttteeennntttss CCoonntteennttss NOT RESTRICTED BY WORLDLY LIMITS 4 D’VAR MALCHUS / SICHOS IN ENGLISH YES, IT’S NORMAL, IT’S LOGICAL, IT’S JUDAISM 8 THE EDITOR’S CORNER / B. MERKUR HE’LL HANG HIS CROWN ON A SIMPLE, ORDINARY 10 NAIL FARBRENGEN WITH RABBI GINSBERG ARE WE OKAY? U.S.A 15 744 Eastern Parkway SHLEIMUS HA’ARETZ / A.Z. KOHN Brooklyn, NY 11213-3409 Tel: (718) 778-8000 Fax: (718) 778-0800 [email protected] WHERE YEHUDA GOT THE GALL FROM www.beismoshiach.org 18 FARBRENGEN WITH RABBI TUVIA BOLTON ERETZ HA’KODESH 72915 s"cj rpf 102 /s/, (03) 9607-290 :iupky TO PUT MOSHIACH AT THE CENTER OF OUR (03) 9607-289 :xep 20 LIVES EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: MOSHIACH & GEULA M.M. Hendel THE REBBE’S LETTER ARRIVED JUST BEFORE THE ENGLISH EDITOR: 25 CRITICAL MOMENT Boruch Merkur SHLEIMUS HA’ARETZ / S. GEFEN “HE WHO RELEASES THE PRISONERS AND Beis Moshiach (USPS 012-542) ISSN 28 REDEEMS THE HUMBLE” 1082-0272 is published weekly, except SHLICHUS / S. GEFEN Jewish holidays (only once in April and October) for $130.00 in Crown Heights, JUST THE REBBE MELECH HA’MOSHIACH $140.00 in the USA & Canada, all 36 SHLEIMUS HA’ARETZ / RABBI S.D. VOLPE others for $150.00 per year (45 issues), by Beis Moshiach, 744 Eastern Parkway, Brooklyn, NY 11213-3409. Periodicals WE ASK, WHAT PALESTINIAN STATE DOES HE postage paid at Brooklyn, NY and 40 MEAN? additional offices. Postmaster: send address changes to Beis Moshiach 744 SHLEIMUS HA’ARETZ / S. GEFEN Eastern Parkway, Brooklyn, NY 11213- 43 BRIS AVROHOM: A SYMBOL FOR EVERY AMERICAN 3409. CITIZEN Beis Moshiach is not responsible for the NEWS content of the advertisements. © Copyright 2002 by Beis Moshiach, Inc DD’’vvaarr MMaallcchhuuss NOT RESTRICTED BY WORLDLY LIMITS SICHOS IN ENGLISH ACKNOWLEDGING THE Pharaoh,” i.e., equal in power to the the relevance of these two thrusts to NATURAL ORDER VS. ruler of the entire civilized world. our present-day lives can be clarified DEFYING IT From this same narrative, we can also by analyzing our Sages’ appreciate the power of Yehudah. For interpretation[75] of the verse from The episodes related in the Torah although Yosef was the ruler of the the Megilla,[76] “So had the king are not merely historical narratives, land, Yehudah approached him established... to do the will of each but rather contain lessons which are without any hesitation, without asking person.” In the original, the latter applicable in all times and places. This permission, ignoring totally the norms phrase reads ish va’ish – lit., “this man concept surely applies to the narrative of court protocol.[73] and that,” and here our Sages perceive at the beginning of Parshas VaYigash an allusion to Mordechai and Haman. which describes how Yehudah (Judah) As we look more closely, a I.e., when Achashverosh was approached Yosef (Joseph) and said, distinction can be drawn between the preparing his feast, he desired to “Please, my master, let your servant two. Yosef’s position was granted to satisfy the desires of both of them. speak..., for you are like Pharaoh.”[70] him by Pharaoh. This implies a degree of respect for Pharaoh’s authority, i.e., There are two opinions among our Both Yehudah and Yosef represent an acknowledgement of the power of Sages regarding the success of his the entire Jewish people. The very the natural order. Yehudah, in venture: One opinion maintains that word Yehudi, Hebrew for “Jew,” is contrast, by approaching Yosef as he since Mordechai and Haman represent derived from the name Yehudah.[71] did,[74] reflects how he refused to two diametrically opposed approaches Similarly, the name Yosef is used (as in acknowledge those limits entirely. As to life, it is impossible for their the Book of T’hillim) to refer to our such, he demonstrated the true divergent wills to be satisfied people as a whole.[72] infinite power a Jew possesses, a simultaneously. A second opinion Both of these personalities power that cannot be confined by any concedes that at present it is indeed demonstrate the way in which a Jew is constraints. impossible for these two polar not restricted by the limits of the approaches to be reconciled; in the worldly environment in which we live. A CONFLICT OF INTERESTS new world-order of the Era of the This is reflected in the above narrative The difference between the Redemption, however, this will which describes Yosef as “like approaches of Yosef and Yehudah and become possible. 70. B’Reishis 44:18. “Yosef” signifies the whole House of Israel. him simply as an Egyptian viceroy. 71. See Rashi on Esther 2:5. 73. Note the comments of B’Reishis Rabba on 75. Megilla 12a. 72. In the verse, Noheg katzon Yosef (“You, Who B’Reishis, loc. cit. 76. Esther 1:8. lead Yosef like a flock”; T’hillim 80:2, and see 74. Although Yosef was in fact his brother, Rashi there), it is clear from the context that Yehudah was not aware of this and considered 4 BEIS MOSHIACH 8 Teives 5763 To explain the analogies involved: position of power without verse,[85] “The world will be filled Achashverosh, as the Sages teach, is compromising his spiritual integrity at with the knowledge of G-d as the representative of G-d;[77] the feast all. waters cover the ocean bed.” By represents our world,[78] and in an quoting this proof text, the Rambam ultimate sense, the fulfillment of its Nevertheless, such an approach highlights the manner in which purpose,[79] the Redemption.[80] does not negate the limitations of the G-dliness will permeate the world in Mordechai represents a Jewish material world. On the contrary, at that age. To understand the simile: In approach to life, while Haman this level, although a Jew is not contrast to the creatures that live on represents the opposite, the challenges controlled by the material aspects of the dry land, the multitude of which the material world poses to his environment, he is still influenced creatures which inhabit the ocean are Jewish practice. by them. Indeed, the Torah itself not readily discernible as teaches that[83] “The law of the land independent entities. When looking FREE WILL is binding”; i.e., the fundamental at the ocean, it is the ocean as a climate of all existence is material, and According to the first of our Sages’ whole and not these particular beings a Jew’s spiritual endeavors are carried that we perceive. Similarly, in the Era interpretations, G-d’s desire to make out in this context.[84] the feast satisfy the desires of Haman of the Redemption, though the and Mordechai refers to the free material world will continue to exist, choice we are granted. To quote the its limitations will not be apparent, Rambam:[81] for it will be suffused with A Jew is not restricted G-dliness.[86] Free will is granted to all men. If one desires to turn towards the path of by the limits of the We have the potential to “live with good... the choice is his.... Man can on worldly environment the Redemption,” to experience a his own initiative... know good and foretaste of this era, at present. In this evil and do as he desires.... There is no in which we live. manner, one can “satisfy the desires of one who compels him, decrees his both Haman and Mordechai”: one can fate, or leads him to either of these live in the material world (Haman’s paths. desire), and yet appreciate the spiritual nature of material reality, Thus, at this level, we are SATISFYING BOTH realizing how in fact it is not separate confronted with a choice; material MORDECHAI AND HAMAN from G-dliness. And this realization is involvement would appear to run the ultimate expression of Mordechai’s A different perspective, however, is contrary to the study of the Torah and service. the observance of its commandments. opened up by the second of our Sages’ A Jew, however, has the potential to interpretations – that the Era of the SHABBOS AS A FORETASTE Redemption will accommodate the follow the example of Mordechai, who OF THE WORLD TO COME “would neither bend the knee nor bow two contrary thrusts of Mordechai (the down.”[82] Despite the pressures of Jew’s spiritual tasks in this world) and To clarify this idea further: The Era the material environment in which we Haman (this world as a barrier to the of the Redemption is described as “the all live, he can hold steadfast to the fulfillment of these tasks). Day which is entirely Shabbos, and rest for life everlasting.”[87] Similarly, life-tasks of the Torah and its mitzvos. The Rambam concludes his Moreover, like Yosef, he can rise to a Shabbos is described as “a microcosm discussion of that Era with the of the World to Come.”[88] And 77. Thus the Meorei Or quotes the Midrash with the phrase, “and everything is prepared for Hilchos Melachim 12:5. which states, “The name Achashverosh – this the feast.” 86. See the essay entitled “The Ultimate Good of alludes to the Holy One, blessed be He, for the 81. Mishneh Torah, Hilchos T’shuva 5:1-2. the Era of the Redemption” (reprinted in “I beginning and end [of creation] belong to Him.” 82. Esther 3:2. Await His Coming Every Day,” published by 78. Cf.: “The world...is like a wedding feast” 83. Gittin 10b. Sichos In English, 1991), where this concept is (Eruvin 54a). discussed in a slightly different context.
Recommended publications
  • Jews and the Un: the Seeds of Distrust
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by YorkSpace JEWS AND THE UN: THE SEEDS OF DISTRUST by Howard Adelman Introduction This is a long article. It is long because of the methodological insistence that a detailed case study is necessary to adjudicate many of the issues in ethics generally and in international ethics in particular. The conditions creating the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) in 1947 and the deliberations of that Committee until it decided to recommend the partition of Palestine will provide the case-study material. Was “justice” the prevailing criterion when UNSCOP took up the issue of the Palestine question? Certainly, the recommendation was not seen to be just by the Arabs. Further, though most Zionists reluctantly accepted the result as the best they could achieve, this did not mean that they thought it was just. On what basis did the UNSCOP recommend the partition solution? In the opening chapter of his first full volume on justice, Brian Barry (1989) took up the notion of justice “in the simplest possible kind of case: a conflict between two parties over the division of some particular scarce resource.” (p.9) The territory covered by the Palestinian Mandate was certainly a scarce resource, only slightly over 10,000 square miles. And Jerusalem itself was unique. Further, the territory was coveted by many parties for its geo-strategic value as a land bridge between Europe, Asia and Africa, and by its Arab neighbors, for they saw it as part of the natural Arab bequest following the demise of colonialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Terrorist Organizations
    Order Code RL32223 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Foreign Terrorist Organizations February 6, 2004 Audrey Kurth Cronin Specialist in Terrorism Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Huda Aden, Adam Frost, and Benjamin Jones Research Associates Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Foreign Terrorist Organizations Summary This report analyzes the status of many of the major foreign terrorist organizations that are a threat to the United States, placing special emphasis on issues of potential concern to Congress. The terrorist organizations included are those designated and listed by the Secretary of State as “Foreign Terrorist Organizations.” (For analysis of the operation and effectiveness of this list overall, see also The ‘FTO List’ and Congress: Sanctioning Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations, CRS Report RL32120.) The designated terrorist groups described in this report are: Abu Nidal Organization (ANO) Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade Armed Islamic Group (GIA) ‘Asbat al-Ansar Aum Supreme Truth (Aum) Aum Shinrikyo, Aleph Basque Fatherland and Liberty (ETA) Communist Party of Philippines/New People’s Army (CPP/NPA) Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group, IG) HAMAS (Islamic Resistance Movement) Harakat ul-Mujahidin (HUM) Hizballah (Party of God) Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM) Jemaah Islamiya (JI) Al-Jihad (Egyptian Islamic Jihad) Kahane Chai (Kach) Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK, KADEK) Lashkar-e-Tayyiba
    [Show full text]
  • The Rights of Israel As the Nation-State of the Jewish People in International Diplomacy Monday, September 19, 2011 | David Citadel Hotel, 7 King David St., Jerusalem
    Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Institute for Research and Policy המרכז הירושלמי לענייני ציבור ומדינה )ע"ר( The Rights of Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People in International Diplomacy Monday, September 19, 2011 | David Citadel Hotel, 7 King David St., Jerusalem Conference Program 11:45-13:15 Session Two On the Eve of the Palestinian Initiative at the United 08:30-09:00 Registration Nations 09:00-09:45 Opening Remarks Chair: Adv. Irit Kohn, Bar-Ilan University; President of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists; Ambassador Dore Gold, President, former Director of the International Department of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs; Israel Ministry of Justice former Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations The Violation of Israel’s Rights in the Minister Moshe (Bogie) Ya’alon, United Nations Vice Prime Minister and Minister for Ambassador Alan Baker, Jerusalem Center for Public Strategic Affairs Affairs; former legal adviser of the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs; former Israeli Ambassador to Canada 09:45-11:15 Session One The Palestinian Initiative and Israel’s Israel’s Historical and Legal Legal Rights Rights Ambassador Dore Gold, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Chair: Ambassador Yehuda Avner, former Adviser to Israeli Prime Palestinian Unilateralism and Israel’s Rights in Arab- Ministers; former Israeli Ambassador Israeli Diplomacy to Britain, Ireland and Australia Dan Diker, Secretary General of the World Jewish Congress The Historical and Legal Contexts of Israel’s Borders 13:15-14:15 Lunch Professor Nicholas Rostow, Distinguished Research Professor at 14:15-14:45 Keynote Address the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterscriptie Staats- En Bestuursrecht
    Masterscriptie Staats- en Bestuursrecht Het vrije mandaat: feit of fictie? Beperkingen aan fractieafsplitsingen getoetst aan het vrije mandaat van Tweede Kamerleden Auteur A. (Arie) Vonk Noordegraaf LL.B. Studentnummer 3675386 Begeleider prof. mr. R. Nehmelman Datum 22 maart 2017 Sol Iustitiae Illustra Nos - Zon der Gerechtigheid, verlicht ons 2 Voorwoord Maartensdijk, 22 maart 2017 Met het afronden van mijn masterscriptie Staats- en Bestuursrecht komt er einde aan mijn studietijd aan de Universiteit Utrecht. Ik heb de afgelopen jaren enorm veel geleerd en ook genoten van de vele juridische vraagstukken die besproken werden. Na het afronden van de bachelor Rechtsgeleerdheid met een scriptie over de vrijheid van onderwijs was de master Staats- en Bestuursrecht een voor de hand liggende keuze. De master sloot goed aan op mijn (politieke) interesses. Hoewel ik zowel het staatsrecht als het bestuursrecht bestudeerde, ligt mijn hart toch echt bij het staatsrecht. Deze scriptie is daar een bewijs van. Het is mooi om juist in dit voorjaar mijn masterscriptie af te ronden. Het jaar 2017 is in het licht van het onderwerp van deze masterscriptie namelijk een bijzonder jaar. Het is dit jaar precies honderd jaar geleden dat in 1917 het stelsel van evenredige vertegenwoordiging werd ingevoerd. Het jaar 1917 is een keerpunt in de parlementaire geschiedenis van Nederland. Enerzijds is dit het begin van de hedendaagse parlementaire democratie. Anderzijds is de invoering van het stelsel van evenredige vertegenwoordiging ook een bedreiging voor het vrije en persoonlijke mandaat van Tweede Kamerleden. De partijmacht wordt groter terwijl individuele Tweede Kamerleden ook in 2017 worden geacht zonder last te stemmen.
    [Show full text]
  • Lions and Roses: an Interpretive History of Israeli-Iranian Relations" (2007)
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 11-13-2007 Lions and Roses: An Interpretive History of Israeli- Iranian Relations Marsha B. Cohen Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI08081510 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Cohen, Marsha B., "Lions and Roses: An Interpretive History of Israeli-Iranian Relations" (2007). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/5 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida LIONS AND ROSES: AN INTERPRETIVE HISTORY OF ISRAELI-IRANIAN RELATIONS A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS by Marsha B. Cohen 2007 To: Interim Dean Mark Szuchman College of Arts and Sciences This dissertation, written by Marsha B. Cohen, and entitled Lions and Roses: An Interpretive History of Israeli-Iranian Relations, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 107 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 107 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 148 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2002 No. 64 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Monday, May 20, 2002, at 12:30 p.m. Senate FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2002 The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE SCHEDULE called to order by the Honorable The Honorable DEBBIE STABENOW led Mr. REID. Madam President, I ask Debbie Stabenow, a Senator from the the Pledge of Allegiance, as follows: unanimous consent that morning busi- State of Michigan. I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the ness be extended until 5 after the hour United States of America, and to the Repub- PRAYER and that Senator COLLINS be recognized lic for which it stands, one nation under God, for 15 minutes and Senator SANTORUM The guest Chaplain, Father Paul indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. be recognized for 10 minutes. Senator Lavin, of St. Joseph’s on Capitol Hill, f STABENOW asked to speak for 15 min- offered the following prayer: utes. That will take us until 10 after. In the book of Tobit we read: APPOINTMENT OF ACTING Thank God! Give him the praise and the PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE I hope Senators will complete their glory. Before all living, acknowledge the The PRESIDING OFFICER. The debate on H.R. 3167 in 20 minutes be- many good things he has done for you, by clerk will please read a communication cause the vote is still going to occur at blessing and extolling his name in song.
    [Show full text]
  • Download UNAOC News Flash July to August 2021
    High-Level Advisory Council of the High Representative for UNAOC NEWS FLASH Volume 20 July-August 2021 The High Representative for UNAOC convened the first meeting of the High-Level Advisory Council of the High Representative of UNAOC with the participation of prestigious members including: H.E. Mr. Amre Moussa, Former Minister for Foreign Affairs of www.unaoc.org Egypt and Former Secretary-General of the League of Arab States; the Hon. Mr. Kevin Michael Rudd AC, Former Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of Australia; H.E. Ms. Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović, Former President of the Republic of Croatia; H.E Ms. Amina UNAOC fb.com/unaoc.org UNAOC Touré, Former Prime Minister of the Republic of Senegal; H.E Ms. Benita Ferrero-Waldner, Former Foreign Minister of the Republic of Austria and Former European Commissioner for External Relations; H.E. Mr. Egeman Bağış, Ambassador of the Republic of Turkey in Prague, Czech Republic and Former Minister for European Union Affairs of the Republic of Turkey; H.E Mr. George Papandreou, Former Prime Minister of Greece; H.E Ms. María Fernanda Espinosa, President of the 73rd Session of the United Nations General Assembly and Former Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Ecuador; H.E. Mr. Viacheslav Fetisov, Ice Hockey Champion and Former Minister of Sports for the Russian Federation; H.E. Dr. Yehuda Lancry, Former Ambassador of Israel to France and Former Permanent Representative of Israel to the United Nations; Dr. Jeffrey Sachs, Economist and Director of the Center for Sustainable Development in the Earth Institute at Columbia University and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Procès Du Sionisme Israélien
    Facebook : La culture ne s'hérite pas elle se conquiert ROGER GARAUDY LE PROCÈS DU SIONISME ISRAÉLIEN Facebook : La culture ne s'hérite pas elle se conquiert Le Procès du sionisme reproduit le système de défense de l'auteur dans son procès en appel à la suite de sa condamnation en janvier 1998 pour la publication d'un autre ouvrage, Les Mythes fondateurs de la politique israélienne, Paris, 1e éd., La Vieille Taupe, 1995, 2e éd., samizdat Roger Garaudy, 1996. Il est affiché entre la première et la deuxième séance de la 11e Chambre de la Cour d'appel de Paris. Il est édité par les éditions Vent du Large et sera prochainement en librairie (ISBN : 2-912341-20-5). Ce livre est affiché sur Internet à des fins d'étude, de recherche, sans but lucratif et pour un usage raisonnable. Pour nous, l'affichage électronique d'un document revient exactement à placer ce document sur les rayons d'une bibliothèque ouverte au public. Nous y avons mis du travail et un peu d'argent. Le seul bénéficiaire en est le lecteur de bonne foi, que nous supposons capable de juger par lui-même. Au lecteur intéressé, nous suggérons d'acheter le livre. Nous n'avons pas de raison de supposer que l'auteur de ce texte puisse être considéré comme responsable d'aucun autre texte publié sur ce site. Le secrétariat international de l'Association des Anciens Amateurs de Récits de Guerre et d'Holocauste. Notre adresse est : [email protected]. Notre adresse postale : PO Box 81475, Chicago, IL 60681-0475, Etats-Unis.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex the Iraq Issue - the United Nations Member States Speak
    Annex The Iraq Issue - The United Nations Member States Speak The Ambassadors REVIEW presents below excerpts from the statements made before the United Nations Security Council on October 16 and 17, 2002, as recorded by The New York Times. Security Council Members United States of America Ambassador John D. Negroponte “The five weeks since the President came to the United Nations (UN) to discuss the threat posed by Iraq have passed quickly. We have seen signs of emerging Council unity during intensive discussions here and in capitals, involving the highest levels of our respective governments. We have also seen clear signs that Iraq is reverting to form. We have seen Iraq invite inspectors to return ‘without conditions,’ and then immediately place conditions. We have seen requests for clarity from UNMOVIC [United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission] and the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] on practical arrangements met by Iraqi obfuscation and multiple answers, which in fact avoid answering at all. Not surprisingly, in the first test of the so-called ‘new Iraqi cooperation,’ Iraq has shown that they hope to return to the word games, ephemeral commitments and misdirec- tion of the past, while continuing to develop the world’s deadliest weapons… The United States (US) believes that the best way to ensure Iraqi compliance is through one resolution that is firm and unambiguous in its message. We are considering the reactions we have received, and will be placing before the Council in the near future a resolution with clear and immediate requirements— requirements that Iraq would voluntarily meet if it chooses to cooperate….
    [Show full text]
  • How Treatment of the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict by the International Court of Justice at the Hague Has Redefined the Doctrine of Self-Defense
    MENDING THE “FENCE”: HOW TREATMENT OF THE ISRAELI- PALESTINIAN CONFLICT BY THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AT THE HAGUE HAS REDEFINED THE DOCTRINE OF SELF-DEFENSE Robert A. Caplen* I. INTRODUCTION ....................................718 II. PALESTINIAN TERRORISM IN ISRAEL AND ISRAEL’S COUNTERTERRORISM INITIATIVE .......................720 A. Palestinian Movements of Self-Determination, 1987-Present ...................................721 1. The First Palestinian Intifada ....................722 2. Violence in Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank, 1993-2000 ...................................723 3. The Second Palestinian Intifada ..................724 B. Israel’s Counterterrorism Initiative ..................725 1. Recognizing the Need for a Security Structure ......726 2. Elements of the Israeli Security Structure ..........727 III. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS DEFINING THE ARAB-ISRAELI CONFLICT .........................................728 A. Zionist Aspirations and Mandatory Palestine ..........728 B. The Derivation of a Two-State Solution ..............729 1. The Peel Commission Partition Plan of 1937 ........730 2. The United Nations Partition Resolution of 1947 ....730 C. The First Arab-Israeli War of 1948 ..................731 D. The Six-Day Arab-Israeli War of 1967 ...............734 E. United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 .......735 IV. ISRAEL AND THE UNITED NATIONS .....................738 A. Isolation of Israel Within the United Nations ..........739 B. Anti-Semitic and Anti-Israeli Sentiment Within the United Nations ...............................740
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary 2006
    Table of Contents Forward 1 Main Points 2 Strategic and Political Challenges for Israel 12 Global Trends and their Implications 38 Challenges in Economy, Society and Government 41 The Jewish People – Present and Future 56 Appendices: Conference Program 61 The Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya 72 The Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and 72 Strategy The Institute for Policy and Strategy 73 Conference Participants 74 Acknowledgements 97 Foreword The Sixth Herzliya Conference on the Balance of Israel’s National Security was held on January 21-24, 2006. The Conference’s deliberations reflected the major issues and dilemmas on Israel’s national agenda in the fields of foreign policy, defense, economics, social policy, governance and Jewish peoplehood. The Conference took place during the period prior to the general elections. The traditional Herzliya Address was delivered by Acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, and he, like the other prime ministerial candidates, highlighted the principles that would govern his policy. The Conference also took place on the eve of the Palestinian elections that won Hamas the majority needed to establish a Hamas government. This development, along with others, led to the assessment that arose from the sessions on national security and foreign policy that 2006 would be a year of significant developments and critical decisions regarding the strategic threats facing Israel – the strengthening of Hamas and the looming confrontation with Iran over its nuclearization. Much of the rest of the Conference was devoted to the key domestic issues in Israel, particularly the maintenance of economic growth, welfare policy and the rule of law in the present political system.
    [Show full text]
  • International Aviv Seminar
    Winter 2008/09 ■ No. 320 ■ USA $3.50 NIS 14 www.wizo.org International Aviv Seminar WIZO Ashdod shelter 25 years of refuge Sderot The campaign continues Michal Chelbin WIZO School graduate, now a famous photographer Managing Editor Ingrid Rockberger Winter 2008/09 l No. 320 l www.wizo.org Editor Hillel Schenker Editorial Board Helena Glaser, Tova Ben-Dov, Annual Subscription: U.S.$ 12.50, NIS 50. Single Copy: U.S.$ 3.50, NIS 14 Yochy Feller, Zipi Amiri, Esther Mor, Sylvie Pelossof, Rebecca Sieff WIZO Center, Tricia Schwitzer, Briana Simon 38 David Hamelech Blvd., Graphic Design Studio Orna Cohen Tel Aviv, Israel Photos Moshe Bitman, Alon Borkovski, Tel: 03-6923805 Fax: 03-6923801 Charlotte Brandon, Michal Chelbin, Internet: www.wizo.org Amnon Eitan, Yael Zur Published by World WIZO E-mail: [email protected] Publicity & Communications Dept. Cover: At the WIZO AVIV International Seminar: L to R - Idit Meleck (WIZO Australia) and Rose Krongold (WIZO Brazil) Photo: Yael Zur Contents 04 President’s Desk 05 Chairperson’s Column 06 Up Front 09 Mumbai Tragedy The WIZO Connection 10 A Safe Haven – 25th Anniversary 10 For 25 years, the WIZO Battered Women’s Shelter in Ashdod has helped women and children start new lives 16 14 Money Well Spent! Update on WIZO’s Sderot Campaign 16 An Outstanding Experience: The 2008 WIZO Aviv International Seminar Inspiring, stimulating and exciting were just some of words “the girls” used to described this years WIZO Aviv International Seminar 19 WIZO Miami Beach: The Heart of the Neighborhood The mayor says that
    [Show full text]