DOCSLIB.ORG

Late Bronze Age to Iron Age Land Use and Subsistence Strategies in the Semirech'ye Region of Kazakhstan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Late Bronze Age to Iron Age Land Use and Subsistence Strategies in the Semirech'ye Region of Kazakhstan Late Bronze Age to Iron Age land use and subsistence strategies in the Semirech'ye region of Kazakhstan Rebecca Claire Roberts A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervised by: Prof. Dorian Fuller Dr. Mark Altaweel Dr. Alison Weisskopf University College London 1 I, Rebecca Claire Roberts, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract This thesis presents the results of phytolith and faecal spherulite analysis from three sites in the Semirech’ye region of south-eastern Kazakhstan, dating from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age (3rd to 1st millennia BC). The primary aim of the research is to generate new data relating to the exploitation of plant resources that can inform on changing land use and subsistence strategies over time. The research is placed in the context of the current understanding of the archaeological and palaeoclimatic record for the region, and aims to offer new insights into the transitional period from the Late Bronze Age to the Iron Age, around the turn of the 1st millennium BC. During this period both the archaeological and palaeoclimatic records point to significant changes in material culture, social organisation, and climate, and this thesis proposes resilience theory as a theoretical model with which to integrate these multi-level data and conceptualise human-environment interactions in the Semirech’ye region and the wider Eurasian steppe zone. 3 Acknowledgements This research was funded through an AHRC studentship. Fieldwork and conference travel were funded through UCL Institute of Archaeology Awards, which were gratefully received. Thanks to my supervisors at UCL, Arlene Rosen and Stephen Shennan, who started me on this journey, and Dorian Fuller, Mark Altaweel, and Alison Weisskopf who saw me through to the end. Thanks to Arlene Rosen for steering me towards phytolith analysis as the means to answer my questions, and to Richard McPhail for his advice on faecal spherulites. I would like to express particular thanks to Alison Weisskopf for all the support and time she has given me over the years, which cannot be fully conveyed in these few words here. Thank you also to Lisa Daniel for her seamless administrative support when I needed it most, and Sandra Bond for technical support in the laboratory. I would like to thank my colleagues working in Kazakhstan who generously gave me access to their sites: Claudia Chang, Perry Tourtellotte, Michael Frachetti, Paula Doumani Dupuy, and Alexander Goryachev. Thanks also to my other colleagues in Kazakhstan who have been so open in their collaboration and sharing of ideas and resources over the years, in no particular order: Alexei Rogozhinskiy, Gian Luca Bonora, Jean-Marc Deom, Renato Sala, Saida Nigmatova, the laboratory team at the Institute of Geology, my fellow PhD students at the A. Kh. Margulan Institute of Archaeology in Almaty, and last but not least Bolat Aubekerov, who sadly passed away before I finished this thesis. Thanks to Rob Spengler for fruitful discussions while we were working on our respective theses, and for sharing of his vast botanical knowledge with me while in the field. My deep and particular thanks to Claudia Chang and Perry Tourtellotte for opening their home (and garage) in Kazakhstan to me in my hour of need, for their generous sharing of time, data, and ideas, and the personal and professional support that they have given me. Without them this research would have never been carried out successfully. 4 I would also like to thank my examiners, Louise Martin and Emma Jenkins for their insightful comments, pertinent questions, and helpful suggestions in the viva. Thanks to you both for your time. Finally, thanks to my family on both sides of the Atlantic, who have given me so much support. Thanks to my parents and grandparents, and to Mum in particular for providing endless hours of baby care while I was writing up, and my parents-in-law for providing the means to cover the rest. To Kevin, Thank You doesn’t even begin to express how much you have carried me through the many lows of this journey: you are my rock. Finally, thanks to Edmund for coming into being and reminding me that I am more than my thesis. Here’s looking at you, dear child. 5 List of contents, figures and tables Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 4 Chapter 1 : Introduction ........................................................................................................ 16 1.1. Overview of research aims .......................................................................................... 17 1.2. Structure of thesis ....................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2 : Background to phytoliths and faecal spherulites and their application in archaeology ............................................................................................................................................... 21 2.1. Phytoliths .................................................................................................................... 21 2.1.1. History of phytolith research in archaeology ....................................................... 21 2.1.2. Formation and preservation of phytolith assemblages ....................................... 23 2.1.3. Phytolith extraction from sediment, identification, and quantification .............. 27 2.1.4. Uses of phytolith data in archaeology ................................................................. 31 2.2. Spherulites .................................................................................................................. 33 2.2.5. Structure and formation of faecal spherulites ..................................................... 33 2.2.6. Preservation of faecal spherulites........................................................................ 35 2.2.7. Use of faecal spherulites in archaeological analyses ........................................... 36 Chapter 3 : Context and research questions ......................................................................... 37 3.3. Political and academic context ................................................................................... 38 3.4. Archaeology ................................................................................................................ 39 3.4.8. Chronology ........................................................................................................... 39 3.4.9. Late Bronze to Iron Age transitions in Central Asia ............................................. 43 3.4.10. Archaeology of Semirech’ye .............................................................................. 48 3.4.11. Archaeology of the exploitation of plant resources in Central Asia .................. 54 3.5. Palaeoclimate .............................................................................................................. 65 3.5.1. Geography and geology ....................................................................................... 65 6 3.5.2. Modelling climate mechanisms ........................................................................... 67 3.5.3. Late Holocene climate ......................................................................................... 74 3.6. Research aims and original contribution of research ................................................. 88 Chapter 4 : Theoretical approach .......................................................................................... 92 4.1. The purpose of archaeological theory ........................................................................ 92 4.2. Resilience theory ........................................................................................................ 95 4.3. Resilience Theory and Archaeology .......................................................................... 103 4.4. Resilience theory in the case of Semirech’ye ........................................................... 106 Chapter 5 : Background to the sites in this study ................................................................ 116 5.1. Soils and vegetation in Semirech’ye ......................................................................... 116 5.2. Tuzusai ...................................................................................................................... 128 5.2.1. Archaeology ....................................................................................................... 130 5.2.2. Palaeoclimate .................................................................................................... 135 5.3. Tasbas ....................................................................................................................... 139 5.3.1. Archaeology ....................................................................................................... 143 5.3.2. Palaeoclimate .................................................................................................... 145 5.4. Turgen II .................................................................................................................... 145 5.4.1. Archaeology ....................................................................................................... 147 5.4.2. Palaeoclimate ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Improving Seeding Success on Cheatgrass-Infested Rangelands in Northern Nevada
    Improving Seeding Success on Cheatgrass- Infested Rangelands in Northern Nevada Item Type Article; text Authors Clements, C. D.; Harmon, D. N.; Blank, R. R.; Weltz, M. Citation Clements, C. D., Harmon, D. N., Blank, R. R., & Weltz, M. (2017). Improving Seeding Success on Cheatgrass-Infested Rangelands in Northern Nevada. Rangelands, 39(6), 174-181. DOI 10.1016/j.rala.2017.10.003 Publisher Society for Range Management Journal Rangelands Rights Copyright © Society for Range Management. Download date 01/10/2021 06:55:07 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/657853 Improving Seeding Success on Cheatgrass-Infested Rangelands in Northern Nevada By Charlie D. Clements, Daniel N. Harmon, Robert R. Blank, and Mark Weltz On the Ground nvasion of alien plant species influences many phases of wildland research in the Great Basin.1 The accidental • Cheatgrass has transformed secondary succes- I introduction and subsequent invasion of cheatgrass (Bromus sion in arid sagebrush plant communities in the tectorum L.) onto millions of hectares of Great Basin Great Basin by providing a fine-textured, early rangelands has led to the conversion of former big sagebrush maturing fuel that increases the chance, rate, (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.)/bunchgrass communities to cheatgrass spread, and season of wildfires. dominance (Fig. 1). Native to Europe, central Asia, and northern • The best known method to suppress cheatgrass Africa, cheatgrass was accidentally introduced to North America, densities and associated fuels is through the where it was first identified in Pennsylvania around 1861 and establishment of perennial grasses.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Nitrogen Availability and Cheatgrass Competition on the Establishment of Vavilov Siberian Wheatgrass Monica B
    Rangeland Ecol Manage 61:475–484 | September 2008 Effects of Nitrogen Availability and Cheatgrass Competition on the Establishment of Vavilov Siberian Wheatgrass Monica B. Mazzola,1 Kimberly G. Allcock,2 Jeanne C. Chambers,3 Robert R. Blank,4 Eugene W. Schupp,5 Paul S. Doescher,6 and Robert S. Nowak7 Authors are 1Graduate Research Assistant, 2Postdoctoral Associate, and 7Professor, Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences Department, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA; 3Research Ecologist, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Reno, NV 89512, USA; 4Soil Scientist, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Exotic and Invasive Weeds Unit, Reno, NV 89512, USA; 5Professor, Department of Rangeland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA; 6Professor, Department of Forest Resources, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA. Abstract Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) is the most widespread invasive weed in sagebrush ecosystems of North America. Restoration of perennial vegetation is difficult and land managers have often used introduced bunchgrasses to restore degraded sagebrush communities. Our objective was to evaluate the potential of ‘Vavilov’ Siberian wheatgrass (Agropyron fragile [Roth] P. Candargy) to establish on cheatgrass-dominated sites. We examined Vavilov establishment in response to different levels of soil nitrogen availability by adding sucrose to the soil to promote nitrogen (N) immobilization and examined cheatgrass competition by seeding different levels of cheatgrass. We used a blocked split-split plot design with two sucrose levels (0 and 360 g ? m22), two levels of Vavilov (0 and 300 seeds ? m22), and five levels of cheatgrass (0, 150, 300, 600, and 1 200 seeds ? m22). Seeding was conducted in fall 2003 and 2004, and measurements were taken in June 2004, 2005, and 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition
    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names th 7 Edition ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori Published by All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be The Internation Seed Testing Association (ISTA) reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted Zürichstr. 50, CH-8303 Bassersdorf, Switzerland in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior ©2020 International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) permission in writing from ISTA. ISBN 978-3-906549-77-4 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 1st Edition 1966 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Prof P. A. Linehan 2nd Edition 1983 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. H. Pirson 3rd Edition 1988 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. W. A. Brandenburg 4th Edition 2001 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 5th Edition 2007 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 6th Edition 2013 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 7th Edition 2019 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori 2 7th Edition ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names Content Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Symbols and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nymphaea Folia Naturae Bihariae Xli
    https://biblioteca-digitala.ro MUZEUL ŢĂRII CRIŞURILOR NYMPHAEA FOLIA NATURAE BIHARIAE XLI Editura Muzeului Ţării Crişurilor Oradea 2014 https://biblioteca-digitala.ro 2 Orice corespondenţă se va adresa: Toute correspondence sera envoyée à l’adresse: Please send any mail to the Richten Sie bitte jedwelche following adress: Korrespondenz an die Addresse: MUZEUL ŢĂRII CRIŞURILOR RO-410464 Oradea, B-dul Dacia nr. 1-3 ROMÂNIA Redactor şef al publicațiilor M.T.C. Editor-in-chief of M.T.C. publications Prof. Univ. Dr. AUREL CHIRIAC Colegiu de redacţie Editorial board ADRIAN GAGIU ERIKA POSMOŞANU Dr. MÁRTON VENCZEL, redactor responsabil Comisia de referenţi Advisory board Prof. Dr. J. E. McPHERSON, Southern Illinois Univ. at Carbondale, USA Prof. Dr. VLAD CODREA, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca Prof. Dr. MASSIMO OLMI, Universita degli Studi della Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy Dr. MIKLÓS SZEKERES Institute of Plant Biology, Szeged Lector Dr. IOAN SÎRBU Universitatea „Lucian Blaga”,Sibiu Prof. Dr. VASILE ŞOLDEA, Universitatea Oradea Prof. Univ. Dr. DAN COGÂLNICEANU, Universitatea Ovidius, Constanţa Lector Univ. Dr. IOAN GHIRA, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca Prof. Univ. Dr. IOAN MĂHĂRA, Universitatea Oradea GABRIELA ANDREI, Muzeul Naţional de Ist. Naturală “Grigora Antipa”, Bucureşti Fondator Founded by Dr. SEVER DUMITRAŞCU, 1973 ISSN 0253-4649 https://biblioteca-digitala.ro 3 CUPRINS CONTENT Botanică Botany VASILE MAXIM DANCIU & DORINA GOLBAN: The Theodor Schreiber Herbarium in the Botanical Collection of the Ţării Crişurilor Museum in
    [Show full text]
  • Writing the Poaceae Treatment for the Flora of Oregon Global Plants Initiative
    VOLUME 17, NUMBER 1 OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY AUGUST 2011 Global Plants Initiative Writing the Poaceae Treatment by Troy Maddux and Aaron Liston for the Flora of Oregon by Barbara L. Wilson, Carex Working Group The Oregon State University Herbarium has joined the Global Plants Initiative, an international partnership of The Carex Working Group is thrilled and relieved. We herbaria working to create a coordinated global database have completed the grass treatment for the Oregon Flora of information and images of plant specimens. With Project! support from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, the OSU Mystified that our work has taken more than a year, Herbarium has obtained a custom HerbScan machine and friends suggested that writing the grass treatment must be the resources to scan the 2,000-plus type specimens in the easy now that the Flora of North America (FNA) grass herbarium. volumes have been published. We would reply that writing Type specimens are very important to plant taxonomists the Oregon grass treatment has not meant simply stripping as the type is the physical representative and ultimate all the non-Oregon grasses from the FNA treatment. reference for every described species (or subspecific taxon). What did we actually do? Once described, type specimens will always represent First, we sought to write a simple key to Oregon’s grass that taxon unless lost or destroyed. Because they are so genera. Early leads of the FNA key are intimidating, and important, types are given special status in herbaria, along grass keys from the Jepson Manual (JM) and Vascular with extra protections to keep them safe.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora-Lab-Manual.Pdf
    LabLab MManualanual ttoo tthehe Jane Mygatt Juliana Medeiros Flora of New Mexico Lab Manual to the Flora of New Mexico Jane Mygatt Juliana Medeiros University of New Mexico Herbarium Museum of Southwestern Biology MSC03 2020 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA 87131-0001 October 2009 Contents page Introduction VI Acknowledgments VI Seed Plant Phylogeny 1 Timeline for the Evolution of Seed Plants 2 Non-fl owering Seed Plants 3 Order Gnetales Ephedraceae 4 Order (ungrouped) The Conifers Cupressaceae 5 Pinaceae 8 Field Trips 13 Sandia Crest 14 Las Huertas Canyon 20 Sevilleta 24 West Mesa 30 Rio Grande Bosque 34 Flowering Seed Plants- The Monocots 40 Order Alistmatales Lemnaceae 41 Order Asparagales Iridaceae 42 Orchidaceae 43 Order Commelinales Commelinaceae 45 Order Liliales Liliaceae 46 Order Poales Cyperaceae 47 Juncaceae 49 Poaceae 50 Typhaceae 53 Flowering Seed Plants- The Eudicots 54 Order (ungrouped) Nymphaeaceae 55 Order Proteales Platanaceae 56 Order Ranunculales Berberidaceae 57 Papaveraceae 58 Ranunculaceae 59 III page Core Eudicots 61 Saxifragales Crassulaceae 62 Saxifragaceae 63 Rosids Order Zygophyllales Zygophyllaceae 64 Rosid I Order Cucurbitales Cucurbitaceae 65 Order Fabales Fabaceae 66 Order Fagales Betulaceae 69 Fagaceae 70 Juglandaceae 71 Order Malpighiales Euphorbiaceae 72 Linaceae 73 Salicaceae 74 Violaceae 75 Order Rosales Elaeagnaceae 76 Rosaceae 77 Ulmaceae 81 Rosid II Order Brassicales Brassicaceae 82 Capparaceae 84 Order Geraniales Geraniaceae 85 Order Malvales Malvaceae 86 Order Myrtales Onagraceae
    [Show full text]
  • Product: 594 - Pollens - Grasses, Bahia Grass Paspalum Notatum
    Product: 594 - Pollens - Grasses, Bahia Grass Paspalum notatum Manufacturers of this Product Antigen Laboratories, Inc. - Liberty, MO (Lic. No. 468, STN No. 102223) Greer Laboratories, Inc. - Lenoir, NC (Lic. No. 308, STN No. 101833) Hollister-Stier Labs, LLC - Spokane, WA (Lic. No. 1272, STN No. 103888) ALK-Abello Inc. - Port Washington, NY (Lic. No. 1256, STN No. 103753) Allermed Laboratories, Inc. - San Diego, CA (Lic. No. 467, STN No. 102211) Nelco Laboratories, Inc. - Deer Park, NY (Lic. No. 459, STN No. 102192) Allergy Laboratories, Inc. - Oklahoma City, OK (Lic. No. 103, STN No. 101376) Search Strategy PubMed: Grass Pollen Allergy, immunotherapy; Bahia grass antigens; Bahia grass Paspalum notatum pollen allergy Google: Bahia grass allergy; Bahia grass allergy adverse; Bahia grass allergen; Bahia grass allergen adverse; same search results performed for Paspalum notatum Nomenclature According to ITIS, the scientific name is Paspalum notatum. Common names are Bahia grass and bahiagrass. The scientific and common names are correct and current. Varieties are Paspalum notatum var. notatum and Paspalum notatum var. saurae. The Paspalum genus is found in the Poaceae family. Parent Product 594 - Pollens - Grasses, Bahia Grass Paspalum notatum Published Data Panel I report (pg. 3124) lists, within the tribe Paniceae, the genus Paspalum, with a common name of Dallis. On page 3149, one controlled study (reference 42: Thommen, A.A., "Asthma and Hayfever in theory and Practice, Part 3, Hayfever" Edited by Coca, A.F., M. Walzer and A.A. Thommen, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield IL, 1931) supported the effectiveness of Paspalum for diagnosis. Papers supporting that Bahia grass contains unique antigens that are allergenic (skin test positive) are PMIDs.
    [Show full text]
  • HOST SPECIFICITY and PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG TILLETIA SPECIES INFECTING WHEAT and OTHER COOL SEASON GRASSES by XIAODO
    HOST SPECIFICITY AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG TILLETIA SPECIES INFECTING WHEAT AND OTHER COOL SEASON GRASSES By XIAODONG BAO A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Plant Pathology DECEMBER 2010 To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of XIAODONG BAO find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. Lori M. Carris, Ph.D., Chair Tobin L. Peever, Ph.D. Jack D. Rogers, Ph.D. Scot H. Hulbert, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express the deepest gratitude to my major advisor Dr. Lori M. Carris, for her persistent guidance, support and encouragement which make it possible to this dissertation. Her enthusiasm for research and excitement in teaching continuously provide inspiration and motivation for my academic goals. I would like to give the most sincere thanks to the members of my dissertation committee, Drs. Tobin L. Peever, Jack D. Rogers and Scot H. Hulbert, for their insightful suggestions to my research and critical review of the dissertation. I am heartily thankful to Dr. Lisa A. Castlebury (USDA-ARS, Baltimore, Maryland) for generously providing sequencing facilities and guidance for my research. I appreciate Mr. Blair J. Goates (USDA-ARS, Aberdeen, ID) for hosting our visit to National Small Grains Collections and providing a treasure of wheat bunt collections for my research. My thanks also go to Drs. Kálmán Vánky (Herbarium Ustilaginales Vánky, Germany), Lennart Johnsson (Plant Pathology and Biocontrol Unit, SLU, Sweden), Veronika Dumalasová (Research Institute of Crop Production, Czech Republic) and Denis A.
    [Show full text]
  • AT = Alpine Tundra MS = Montane Spruce ESSF = Engelmann Spruce–Subalpine Fir PP = Ponderosa Pine ICH = Interior Cedar–Hemloc
    APPENDIX 1 Grasses of the Columbia Basin Region by BEC zone AT = Alpine Tundra MS = Montane Spruce ESSF = Engelmann Spruce–Subalpine Fir PP = Ponderosa Pine ICH = Interior Cedar–Hemlock SBS = Sub-Boreal Spruce IDF = Interior Douglas-fir List from database AT ESSF ICH IDF MS PP SBS 1. Agropyron cristatum ssp. pectinatum ✔✔ ✔ 2. Agropyron fragile ✔ 3. Agrostis capillaris ✔ 4. Agrostis exarata ✔✔ 5. Agrostis gigantea ✔✔ ✔✔✔ 6. Agrostis humilis ✔✔ ✔ 7. Agrostis scabra ✔✔ ✔✔✔✔ 8. Agrostis stolonifera ✔✔ 9. Agrostis thurberiana 10. Agrostis variabilis ✔✔ ✔ 11. Aira caryophyllea ✔ 12. Alopecurus aequalis ✔✔ ✔ 13. Alopecurus geniculatus 14. Apera interrupta ✔✔✔ ✔ 15. Aristida purpurea var. robusta ✔ 16. Avena fatua ✔✔ 17. Avena sativa ✔ 18. Beckmannia syzigachne ✔✔ 19. Bouteloua gracilis ✔ 20. Bromus aleutensis ✔ 21. Bromus anomalus 22. Bromus briziformis ✔✔ ✔ 23. Bromus carinatus ✔✔ 24. Bromus ciliatus ✔✔✔ 25. Bromus commutatus ✔ 26. Bromus hordeaceus ✔✔ ✔ 27. Bromus inermis ✔✔✔✔ 28. Bromus japonicus ✔✔ 29. Bromus marginatus ✔✔✔ 30. Bromus pumpellianus ✔ 31. Bromus richardsonii ✔✔✔✔ 32. Bromus sitchensis ✔ 33. Bromus tectorum ✔ ✔✔✔✔ 34. Bromus vulgaris ✔ 35. Calamagrostis canadensis ✔✔ ✔✔✔✔ 36. Calamagrostis montanensis ✔✔ 37. Calamagrostis purpurascens ✔✔ ✔✔✔ 38. Calamagrostis rubescens ✔✔✔✔ 39. Calamagrostis scribneri 40. Calamagrostis stricta ✔ ✔✔✔✔✔ 41. Calamovilfa longifolia ✔✔ ✔ 42. Cinna latifolia ✔✔ ✔ APPENDIX 1 (Continued) List from database AT ESSF ICH IDF MS PP SBS 43. Cynosurus echinatus ✔ 44. Dactylis glomerata ✔✔✔✔ 45. Danthonia
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region
    Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (VERSION 3) NEIL SNOW Herbarium Pacificum Bernice P. Bishop Museum 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, HI 96817 [email protected] Suggested citation: Snow, N. 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (Version 3). 316 pp. Retrievable from the Colorado Native Plant Society (http://www.conps.org/plant_lists.html). The author retains the rights irrespective of its electronic posting. Please circulate freely. 1 Snow, N. January 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region. (Version 3). Dedication To all who work on behalf of the conservation of species and ecosystems. Abbreviated Table of Contents Fern Allies and Ferns.........................................................................................................12 Gymnopserms ....................................................................................................................19 Angiosperms ......................................................................................................................21 Amaranthaceae ............................................................................................................23 Apiaceae ......................................................................................................................31 Asteraceae....................................................................................................................38 Boraginaceae ...............................................................................................................98
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of the Maternal Genome of Tetraploid Ststyy Elymus (Triticeae: Poaceae) Species and the Monogenomic Triticeae Based on Rps16 Sequence Data
    Plant Science 178 (2010) 463–468 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Plant Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/plantsci Phylogenetic analysis of the maternal genome of tetraploid StStYY Elymus (Triticeae: Poaceae) species and the monogenomic Triticeae based on rps16 sequence data Curtis D. Hodge, Huan Wang, Genlou Sun ∗ Biology Department, Saint Mary’s University, 923 Robie Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada article info abstract Article history: Although there have been several studies on the maternal genome donor of StStYY Elymus species, due Received 21 December 2009 to either the lack of inclusion of all the Triticeae diploid species or limited number of StY species used in Received in revised form 3 March 2010 the previous studies, it is necessary to investigate the origin of the maternal genome of the StStYY Elymus Accepted 4 March 2010 species with comprehensive samples of Triticeae diploid species. In this study we analyzed 18 tetraploid Available online 10 March 2010 StStYY Elymus species along with 27 diploid Triticeae species using chloroplast gene encoding ribosomal protein S16 (rps16) in an attempt to identify the maternal genome donor of StStYY Elymus species. The Keywords: rps16 data indicates that Pseudoroegneria is the maternal genome donor of StStYY Elymus species. A close Elymus Maternal genome relationship of the chloroplast of Thinopyrum and Dasypyrum with the St genome is found which leaves Chloroplast genome the possibility that Thinopyrum and Dasypyrum may have contributed to the chloroplast genome in StStYY Triticeae species. We also analyzed the cpDNA phylogeny for the monogenomic genera. Psathyrostachys juncea is at Phylogenetic analysis the base of the Triticeae tree, while the rest of the Triticeae species forms a well supported clade with a 91% bootstrap value.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Siberian Wheatgrass Germplasm from Kazakhstan (Poaceae: Triticeae)
    J. Range Manage. 53: 347–352 May 2000 Characterization of Siberian wheatgrass germplasm from Kazakhstan (Poaceae: Triticeae) KEVIN B. JENSEN, KAY H. ASAY, DOUGLAS A. JOHNSON, AND BAO JUN LI Authors are research geneticists and plant physiologist, USDA-ARS Forage and Range Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, Ut. 84322-6300; and assistant director, Grassland Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi, Xinjiang, People’s Republic of China, 830000. Abstract Resumen Siberian wheatgrass [Agropyron fragile (Roth) Candargy] is El zacate "Siberian wheatgrass" [Agropyron fragile ( R o t h ) known for its establishment and persistence on sandy soils under Candagry] es conocido por su establecimiento y persistencia en severe water limitations. Morphology, cytology, and forage and suelos arenosos bajo severas limitaciones de agua. Se estudio la seed characteristics were studied on 59 accessions (JA) of morfología, citología y características del forraje y semilla de 59 Siberian wheatgrass collected on sandy soils in the desert areas of accesiones (JA) de "Siberian wheatgrass" obtenidas de suelos western Kazakhstan. Plants were grown at Nephi, Ut., from 1993 arenosos de las áreas desérticas del oeste de Kazakhstan. Las to1996 and compared with the check cultivars of Vavilov and P- plantas se cultivaron en Nephi, Ut de 1993 a 1996 y se compara- 27 Siberian wheatgrass, and Nordan crested wheatgrass [A . ron con los cultivares testigo Vavilov y P-27 de "Siberian wheat- desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) Schultes]. All JA-accessions were grass" y Nordan de "Crested wheatgrass" [A. desewrtorum autotetraploids, 2n = 4x = 28. The most frequently observed mei- (Fisch. Ex. Link) Schultes]. Todas las accesiones de JA fueron otic association was 6 bivalents + 4 quadrivalents.
    [Show full text]