DOCSLIB.ORG

Revolutionary Iran and the United States US Foreign Policy and Conflict in the Islamic World

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revolutionary Iran and the United States US Foreign Policy and Conflict in the Islamic World REVOLUTIONARY IRAN AND THE UNITED STATES US Foreign Policy and Conflict in the Islamic World Series Editor Tom Lansford University of Southern Mississippi, USA The proliferation of an anti-US ideology among radicalized Islamic groups has emerged as one of the most significant security concerns for the United States and contemporary global relations in the wake of the end of the Cold War. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 demonstrated the danger posed by Islamic extremists to US domestic and foreign interests. Through a wealth of case studies this new series examines the role that US foreign policy has played in exacerbating or ameliorating hostilities among and within Muslim nations as a means of exploring the rise in tension between some Islamic groups and the West. The series provides an interdisciplinary framework of analysis which, transcending traditional, narrow modes of inquiry, permits a comprehensive examination of US foreign policy in the context of the Islamic world. Other titles in the series Great Powers and Regional Orders The United States and the Persian Gulf Edited by Markus Kaim ISBN 978-0-7546-7197-8 Fostering Fundamentalism Terrorism, Democracy and American Engagement in Central Asia Matthew Crosston ISBN 978-0-7546-4632-7 US Foreign Policy and the Horn of Africa Peter Woodward ISBN 978-0-7546-3580-2 US-Pakistan Relationship Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan A.Z. Hilali ISBN 978-0-7546-4220-6 Revolutionary Iran and the United States Low-intensity Conflict in the Persian Gulf JoSEPH J. ST. MARIE University of Southern Mississippi, USA SHAHdAd NAGHSHPoUR University of Southern Mississippi, USA © Joseph J. St. Marie and Shahdad Naghshpour 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Joseph J. St. Marie and Shahdad Naghshpour have asserted their right under the Copyright, designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the authors of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East Suite 420 Union Road 101 Cherry Street Farnham Burlington Surrey, GU9 7PT VT 05401-4405 England USA www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data St Marie, Joseph J. Revolutionary Iran and the United States : Low-intensity Conflict in the Persian Gulf. – (US Foreign Policy and Conflict in the Islamic World) 1. Iran – Foreign relations – United States. 2. United States – Foreign relations – Iran. 3. Iran – Foreign economic relations – United States. 4. United States – Foreign economic relations – Iran. 5. Iran – History – Revolution, 1979–Influence. 6. Low-intensity conflicts (Military science) – Persian Gulf Region– History. I. Title II. Series III. Naghshpour, Shahdad. 327.5’5073-dc22 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data St. Marie, Joseph J. Revolutionary Iran and the United States: Low-intensity Conflict in the Persian Gulf / by Joseph J. St. Marie and Shahdad Naghshpour. p. cm. – (US Foreign Policy and Conflict in the Islamic World) Includes index. 1. United States – Foreign relations – Iran. 2. Iran – Foreign relations – United States. 3. Low intensity conflicts (Military science) – Persian Gulf. I. Naghshpour, Shahdad. II. Title. JZ1480.A57I718 2011 327.73055–dc22 2010048958 ISBN 9780754676706 (hbk) ISBN 9781409427223 (ebk) V We dedicate this work to the memory of our parents: John H. & Josephine St. Marie Ali & Azam Naghshpour This page has been left blank intentionally Contents Acknowledgements ix 1 Low-Intensity Conflict and Fourth Generation Warfare 1 2 Early Contacts 29 3 End of Qajar and the beginning of Pahlavi dynasty (1914-1925) 59 4 The Beginning of American Influence 81 5 Economic Relations between the United States and Iran 113 6 The 1979 Revolution and the Beginning of the Conflict with the United States 141 7 Low-Level Military Confrontation in the Persian Gulf 165 8 The Future of the Relationship 183 Index 199 This page has been left blank intentionally Acknowledgements Great thanks go two of our graduate students Mr. Rian Plaswirth and Mr. Jim Kierulff who provided helpful assistance. This page has been left blank intentionally Chapter 1 Low-Intensity Conflict and Fourth Generation Warfare The relationship between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States is for all practical purposes a non-relationship with each nation pursuing adversarial and hostile policies and actions towards the other. The reality of the situation is that Iran and the United States are nations engaged in a low-intensity conflict. This work examines the low-intensity conflict between the United States and Iran, with respect to the military, economic, and political aspects in which the conflict has taken in the past thirty years. This chapter investigates the relationship between The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America before and after the 1979 Iranian Islamic Revolution with particular emphasis on the post-revolutionary war stages. The analysis examines the adversarial relationship, fourth generation warfare (political, economic and diplomatic war in the 21st. Century), and the theoretical constructs that surround this form of warfare between states. Furthermore, this chapter sets the stage for subsequent chapters by demonstrating how domestic politics and low-intensity warfare are linked. This linkage, we argue, determines the ebb and flow of the conflict. The Adversarial Relationship The effective date of this conflict can be pinpointed as 4 November 1979, when Iranian radical students seized the US embassy in Tehran, taking US diplomats and civilian workers hostage for 444 days. This action, which was tacitly sanctioned by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, produced a long lasting and significant change in US foreign policy toward Iran (Jordet nd, Pollack 2004, Quosh 2007). The diplomatic crisis was highlighted by the failed American rescue attempt of the hostages, which put each nation firmly in a confrontational state. Subsequent confrontations were manifested through moral or ideological struggles between two opposing ideologies pursued by means other than direct military confrontation. Similar to Western political practice, the Islamic Republic has democratic institutions and constitutional checks and balances. However, these governmental characteristics are derived from Islamic law which is inherently undemocratic. For example, candidates for political office are required to submit their credentials to religious scholars before they are certified to stand for election (Abrahamian 2008, Thaler et al. 2010). The Constitution of the Islamic Republic is derived 2 Revolutionary Iran and the United States from Shia Islamic law, which in turn is derived from the Koran, the “infallible word of God.” The Islamic Republic has created a political system diametrically opposed to the American and Jeffersonian ideals of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” through the implementation of various social, economic, and political controls. The Iranian government sees the American constitution and political system as corrupt and devoid of the perquisite religious component, which they deem necessary for a just society. With such diverse ideological views there has been little common ground for compromise or co-existence. Those episodes of cooperation such as “Arms for Hostages” have tended to end badly. Even Iranian assistance in the defeat of the Taliban was short lived after Iran was made part of the “Axis of Evil” short of direct military conflict both have sought various means to demonstrate their ideological superiority within political and economic arenas. Levels of Analysis To begin, a meaningful comparison of Iranian and American interaction must examine the levels of analysis to determine how they relate to low-intensity conflict and fourth generation warfare. To be sure, it is generally accepted that individual, state, and systemic or global levels of analysis are proper domains of inquiry for the study of international relations and, more specifically, conflicts. The present analysis crosses various domains as an essential function of the nature of modern conflict. Since modern conflict is multi-dimensional our analysis will be multi-dimensional. The individual level of analysis is primarily concerned with the motivations, constraints, and incentives a decision maker works under. While there are incentives and constraints imposed upon all decision makers, the personal traits of a policy maker are appropriate for the study of low-intensity conflict and fourth generation warfare (Lind 2004). Given the overarching ideological or moral component of this new type of warfare, personal attributes become important when examining individual and collective motivations or preferences for certain policy actions. Looking at the state and its internal attributes to determine policy direction is another part of fourth generation warfare analysis. Clearly the alignment, relative power, and ideology of constituent groups within a state have a profound impact on the policies a state may pursue. The fragility of the ruling coalition, strength of the opposition as well as economic and military threats all impact decisions made by elites within the state. Including the state level of analysis in our conflict model is appropriate as specific tactics and strategies are constrained by domestic factors as well as personal and systemic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History Brief: Timeline of US-Iran Relations Until the Obama
    MIT International Review | web.mit.edu/mitir 1 of 5 HISTORY BRIEF: TIMELINE OF US‐IRAN RELATIONS UNTIL THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION Key Facts & Catalysts By Sam Sasan Shoamanesh Looking back at key events in this US‐Iran chronicle is helpful in understanding some of the traditional causes of friction and mistrust between Tehran and Washington. A reference to the annals of US‐Iran relations will also be valuable in appreciating that the policies of the past sixty years have not been advantageous to US interests and on the contrary, have resulted in blowbacks, which still vex the relations to this day. 1856: Genesis of Formal Relations | Diplomatic relations between Iran and the United States began in 1856. 1909: American Lafayette in Iran | In 1909, Howard Baskerville, an American teacher and Princeton graduate on a Presbyterian mission in Tabriz, Iran, instantly becomes an Iranian national hero where after joining the Constitutionalists during the Constitutional Revolution of 1905‐1911, loses his young life while fighting the Royalists and the forces of the Qajar king, Mohmmad Ali Shah’s elite Cossack brigade. He is remembered as saying: ʺ[t]he only difference between me and these people is my place of birth, and this is not a big difference.ʺ To this day he is revered by Iranians. Second World War | Until the second World War, the US had no interest or an active policy vis‐à‐vis Iran and relations remained cordial. 1953 C.I.A. Coup | In 1951, Prime Minister Mossadegh and his National Front party (“Jebhe Melli”), a socio‐democratic, liberal‐secular nationalist party in Iran, nationalize the country’s oil industry.
    [Show full text]
  • 103 Spring Qtr 2020
    Issue #103 Spring Quarter 2020 The Official Newsletter of the Association of Minemen In This Issue: Mine Warfare in the News Underwater Mine History: Nicaragua, Iran COMOMAG Update AOM Reunion 2020 TAPS and Binnacle List Miscellaneous Mineman Flotsam and Jetsam From The President MNCM John Epps, USN (Ret.) Notable Quotable I’d like to pass on my condolences to the families of recently departed shipmates and family members. Know that you, as well as those on the Binnacle List, are in our thoughts and prayers. “ You may not control all the events that I hope that everyone is staying safe during this Corona- happen to you, but you can decide not to virus event. It can be a scary time for us older shipmates, especially those with underlying health conditions. There have be reduced by them.” —Maya Angelou been many mandated, as well as suggested procedures that we have been asked to adhere to. We must all do our best to stay healthy for ourselves and loved ones. Carolyn and I are following the necessary steps so we can attend many future Reunions and hope to see you all at them as well. Unless things take a turn for the worse, the upcoming 46th Annual “History doesn’t repeat, Mineman Reunion will proceed as planned in Charleston, SC. Charles Humbard is keeping a close watch on conditions there but it often rhymes…” and will let us know as early as possible if we must cancel the event. Volunteers are still needed to assist so please lend often credited to Mark Twain your shipmate a hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Persian Gulf Campaign for DCS: F-14A the Persian Gulf Map Presents a Wonderful Opportunity to Merge Existing Or Pending Asse
    Persian Gulf Campaign for DCS: F-14A The Persian Gulf map presents a wonderful opportunity to merge existing or pending assets within DCS to create a compelling Naval warfare campaign centered on the F-14A. This campaign aspires to recreate and build upon true events of 1987-88 during which the US Navy fought an undeclared war against Iran. While the player will view these scenarios through the lens of a Naval aviator, operations in the Gulf of Oman and Strait of Hormuz involved a wide range of USN units and capabilities. Combat missions associated with Operation Earnest Will during 1987 and 1988 offers an excellent opportunity for creating realistic DCS campaign scenarios for the DCS: F-14A and the DCS: Strait of Hormuz map. It combines a real operation (largest USN operation since WWII) with an available DCS map and a DCS module placed into the correct era for the operation. Iran is also an interesting opponent for the US Navy during the late 1980s. On one hand, the Iranian Air Force and Navy have an intimate, if slightly outdated, understanding of American equipment and tactics. Nearly every piece of military hardware that they possess was American made and the majority of their senior military staff were either trained in the US or by American personnel. However, my 1987-88 their military was generally quite depleted. The precise number of operational aircraft is unclear, but evidence suggests that only 20-35% of their aircraft were operational with an unclear supply of remaining missiles and ammunition. Iran did manage to obtain parts and missiles as part of the Iran-Contra scandal, but demand still managed to outstrip supply (most likely).
    [Show full text]
  • Khomeinism, the Islamic Revolution and Anti Americanism
    Khomeinism, the Islamic Revolution and Anti Americanism Mohammad Rezaie Yazdi A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Political Science and International Studies University of Birmingham March 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The 1979 Islamic Revolution of Iran was based and formed upon the concept of Khomeinism, the religious, political, and social ideas of Ayatullah Ruhollah Khomeini. While the Iranian revolution was carried out with the slogans of independence, freedom, and Islamic Republic, Khomeini's framework gave it a specific impetus for the unity of people, religious culture, and leadership. Khomeinism was not just an effort, on a religious basis, to alter a national system. It included and was dependent upon the projection of a clash beyond a “national” struggle, including was a clash of ideology with that associated with the United States. Analysing the Iran-US relationship over the past century and Khomeini’s interpretation of it, this thesis attempts to show how the Ayatullah projected "America" versus Iranian national freedom and religious pride.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Last War: Balancing Ground Forces and Future
    APRIL 2013 Beyond the Last War Balancing Ground Forces and Future Challenges Risk in USCENTCOM and USPACOM A Report of the CSIS International Security Program PROJECT PROGRAM CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS DIRECTOR DIRECTOR Stephanie Sanok Errol Laumann Sam Eaton Nathan Freier David Berteau Jacquelyn Guy Steven Nicolucci Megan Loney Curtis Buzzard J.P. Pellegrino Beyond the Last War Balancing Ground Forces and Future Challenges Risk in USCENTCOM and USPACOM PROJECT DIRECTOR Nathan Freier PROGRAM DIRECTOR David Berteau CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Stephanie Sanok Jacquelyn Guy Curtis Buzzard Errol Laumann Steven Nicolucci J.P. Pellegrino Sam Eaton Megan Loney A Report of the CSIS International Security Program April 2013 CHARTING our future ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK About CSIS—50th Anniversary Year For 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has developed solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. As we celebrate this milestone, CSIS scholars are developing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Business in Iran After the Nuclear Deal
    Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Back to Business in Iran After the Nuclear Deal: Maximizing Opportunity and Minimizing Liability Risks Navigating Remaining Sanctions and Customs Controls, Obtaining Necessary Licenses, and International Tax Planning TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2015 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific Today’s faculty features: Mehrdad Ghassemieh, Partner, Harlowe & Falk, Tacoma, Wash. Nnedinma C. Ifudu Nweke, Senior Counsel, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Washington, D.C. Barbara D. Linney, Member, Miller & Chevalier Chartered, Washington, D.C. David B. Woodward, President & CEO, Associates in Cultural Exchange, Seattle The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10. Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-570-7602 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again. Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Covers Relating to the Iran/Iraq Tanker War
    THE IRAN/IRAQ TANKER WAR AND RENAMED TANKERS ~ Lawrence Brennan, (US Navy Ret.) SHIP COVERS RELATING TO THE IRAN/IRAQ TANKER WAR & REFLAGGED KUWAITI TANKERS, 1987-881 “The Kuwaiti fleet reads like a road map of southern New Jersey” By Captain Lawrence B. Brennan, U.S. Navy Retired2 Thirty years ago there was a New Jersey connection to the long-lasting Iran-Iraq War. That eight years of conflict was one of the longest international two-state wars of the 20th century, beginning in September 1980 and effectively concluding in a truce in August 1988. The primary and bloody land war between Iran and Iraq began during the Iranian Hostage Crisis. The Shah had left Iran and that year the USSR invaded Afghanistan. The conflict expanded to sea and involved many neutral nations whose shipping came under attack by the combatants. The parties’ intent was to damage their opponents’ oil exports and revenues and decrease world supplies. Some suggested that Iran and Iraq wanted to draw other states into the conflict. An Iranian source explained the origin of the conflict at sea. The tanker war seemed likely to precipitate a major international incident for two reasons. First, some 70 percent of Japanese, 50 percent of West European, and 7 percent of American oil imports came from the Persian Gulf in the early 1980s. Second, the assault on tankers involved neutral shipping as well as ships of the belligerent states.3 The relatively obscure first phase began in 1981, and the well-publicized second phase began in 1984. New Jersey, half a world away from the Persian (Arabian) gulf, became involved when the United States agreed to escort Kuwait tankers in an effort to support a friendly nation and keep the international waters open.
    [Show full text]
  • List of BPL Households : ULB Code : 79 Sl
    ULB Name : KOLKATA MC : List of BPL Households : ULB Code : 79 Sl. N House/ Flat No. Name of Para/ Slum Name of family Head Son/ Daughter/ Wife of Survey ID No. o Ward No 28 1 296/1/H/10 MD. JALIL LATE ABDUL MAJID 176 R 2 296/1/H/4 LAL MAHAMMAD SK. NANKU 185 R 3 17/5/H/5 MOUMITA BAG DINESH BAG 140 R 4 17/2/H/18 ANNAPURNA GOSWAMI LATE MAHESH CH.GOSWAMI 134 R 5 1/1 DIPALI MIDHA BASU MIDHA 477 R 6 FARIDA BEGUM YUNIS 6480 7 NAJIA PARUEEN ABDUL JABBAR 6478 8 KHALID ANWAR A NAWAB 6476 9 SULTANA NAWAB MD YOUSUF 6475 10 ABDUL NAWAB ABDUL MAHEB 6473 11 MD ABBAS MD FEKU 6472 12 MD RIGULAN ABDUL JABBAR 6471 13 SALAM KHATOON MD MOJIB 6470 14 MD YUNIS A RAHIM 6479 15 258/15/H/1 ASHOK BISWAS GANESH BISWAS 1525 16 ANJUMAR ABDUL NAWAB 6474 17 3A/H/4 MD DULARA MD HANIF 6503 18 ZUNAID ALAM A WAHAB 6481 19 264/A SOVA DAS MANAS DAS 1242 20 3A/H/3 S K BABU S K BABU HUSAN 6499 21 3A/H/5 ISMAT ARA MD ISRAFIL 6490 22 SAHABNAM PARUEEN A RAHIM 6477 23 3A/H/6 ROSAN ARA MD MUSTAQUE AHMED 6487 24 AFTAB ALAM A WHABA 6483 25 AFSANA PARUEEN ZUNAIDALAM 6482 26 294/1/2 ANNA HALDAR MAMA HALDAR 4092 27 260/1 A P C ROAD KANU GHOSH LATE KHOGEN GHOSH 383 R 28 264 A P C ROAD DURGA KUMARI ROY KAILASH KUMAR ROY 936 R 29 264 A P C ROAD ANIL ROY LATE ATOYARI ROY 935 R 30 264 A P C ROAD GOPAL DAS RABI DAS 934 R 31 264 A P C ROAD UMESH DAS LATE MOHESH DAS 949 R 32 260/1 A P C ROAD BIJAY PAL LATE DUKHIRAM PAL 388 R 33 260/1 A P C ROAD DULAL DAS TINKORI DAS 380 R Reporting Format : List of BPL Households Page 335 of 904 ULB Name : KOLKATA MC : List of BPL Households : ULB Code : 79 Sl.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Not? E Case for an American-Iranian Alliance
    BOLOGNA CENTER JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Why Not? !e Case for an American-Iranian Alliance Renad Mansour and Ben Hartley In an age of global uncertainty, allies and enemies must be scrutinized, and we must question why we choose to be in con#ict. Iran, as it pursues a nuclear weapon as a security guarantee, is perhaps the most important case to re-examine. "is paper argues that the United States should not only prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, it should try to make Iran an American ally. What this would look like in practice is di$cult to say. "is paper merely initiates discussion of a scenario long considered impossible, and shows that there is signi%cant mutual interest in pursuing it. While shared trust cannot occur in the current situation, o!ers of cooperation from both sides o!er the only recourse to a future without a prolonged nuclear stando! akin to that with North Korea. "e scope of this paper is con%ned to laying the groundwork for establishing potential areas of cooperation and identifying the mutual bene%ts that would arise as a result. “"e only di!erence between me and these of sanctions, the rial has depreciated people is my place of birth, and this is not a by over 75 percent.2 !e government’s big di!erence.” 1 subsidy program, although moderately — Howard Baskerville e"ective for segments of the population such as the extreme poor, has squeezed Howard Baskerville fought for the middle class. Prices for bread, rice, constitutional democracy in Iran during vegetables, and milk doubled in 2012, the 1930s, dying at the age of 24 while leaving Iranians without money for food leading revolutionary forces against and shelter.3 Unemployment is believed the Qajar royalists.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 46 No. 2 Whole Number 210 May 2018
    NJPH The Journal of the NEW JERSEY POSTAL HISTORY SOCIETY ISSN: 1078-1625 Vol. 46 No. 2 Whole Number 210 May 2018 New Jersey Pioneer Air Mail A failed ship-to-shore flight card, postmarked at East Rutherford, Nov. 13, 1910. Only 7 years after the Wright Brothers’ first flight, pioneer air mail began. See page 63. ~ CONTENTS ~ President’s Message ................................................................................ Robert G. Rose ............... 60 MERPEX/NOJEX/POCAX ..................................................................... ........................................ 61 New Jersey Pioneer Air Mail ........................................................................... Robert G. Rose ................ 63 William Joyce Sewell, U.S. Senator & Railroad President...................... John B. Sharkey.............. 68 Ship Covers Relating to the Iran/Iraq Tanker War & Reflagged Kuwaiti Tankers, 1987-8 ..............................................................................Capt. Lawrence B. Brennan (U.S. Navy, Ret,)... 77 An Addition to the Vroom Correspondence .................................................. Don Bowe .........................90 Revisiting 19th Century New Jersey Fancy Cancels................................ Jean R. Walton ............... 94 Foreign Mail to and from Morris County ~ Part 8: Cape Verde Islands to Morris County.............................................. Donald A. Chafetz........ 104 Member News: Member Changes, Thanks to Donors, Reminders, etc........ .........................................109
    [Show full text]
  • Why Should Anyone Be Familiar with Persian Literature?
    Annals of Language and Literature Volume 4, Issue 1, 2020, PP 11-18 ISSN 2637-5869 Why should anyone be Familiar with Persian Literature? Shabnam Khoshnood1, Dr. Ali reza Salehi2*, Dr. Ali reza Ghooche zadeh2 1M.A student, Persian language and literature department, Electronic branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran 2Persian language and literature department, Electronic branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran *Corresponding Author: Dr. Ali reza Salehi, Persian language and literature department, Electronic branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Literature is a tool for conveying concepts, thoughts, emotions and feelings to others that has always played an important and undeniable role in human life. Literature encompasses all aspects of human life as in love and affection, friendship and loyalty, self-sacrifice, justice and cruelty, manhood and humanity, are concepts that have been emphasized in various forms in the literature of different nations of the world. Poets and writers have endeavored to be heretics in the form of words and sentences and to promote these concepts and ideas to their community. Literature is still one of the most important identifiers of nations and ethnicities that no other factor has been able to capture. As a rich treasure trove of informative and educational material, Persian literature has played an important role in the development and reinforcement of social ideas and values in society, which this mission continues to do best. In this article, we attempt to explain the status of Persian literature and its importance. Keywords: language, literature, human, life, religion, culture. INTRODUCTION possible to educate without using the humanities elite.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiyaei, Mousavian Discuss Nuclear Deal and Iran's Future As Regional
    11/6/2015 Kiyaei, Mousavian discuss nuclear deal and Iran’s future as regional power | The Chautauquan Daily • • • Morning Lecture, Morning Lecture Recaps Kiyaei, Mousavian discuss nuclear deal and Iran’s future as regional power Sam Flynn on August 22, 2015 / 0 comments The Iran nuclear deal has stirred much debate and controversy in the United States over the last two months. Seyed Hossein Mousavian and Emad Kiyaei, two Iranians, teamed up to shed light on the nuclear deal and Iran’s perspective on the global landscape. Mousavian, a former diplomat and Iranian nuclear negotiator, and Kiyaei, executive director of the American-Iranian Council, were the final morning lecturers of Week Eight, “The Middle East Now and Next.” Mousavian is a pro-U.S. Iranian and the co-author of Iran and the United States, An Insider’s View on the Failed Past and the Road to Peace, which was published last year and chronicles U.S.-Iran relations from 1856 to the present day. The two men took the Amphitheater stage sans Mousavian’s son, Mohammed, who was scheduled to appear. Mohammed was held up by a delayed flight from Philadelphia, where he is a graduate student at the University of Pennsylvania. Kiyaei questioned Mousavian on the deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, its implications, significance and whether it was a good or bad deal. According to Mousavian, the international consensus is that the U.S. and its allies, the P5+1 consisting of Germany, France, the United Kingdom, China and Russia, achieved their objective: to prevent every path that Iran could take to a nuclear bomb.
    [Show full text]