DOCSLIB.ORG

Marin County, CA Supplemental Opt-In Survey Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marin County, CA Supplemental Opt-In Survey Results Marin County, CA Supplemental Opt-in Survey Results 2019 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com • 303-444-7863 icma.org • 800-745-8780 Contents About this Report ............................................................................. 1 Complete Survey Responses ............................................................. 2 Verbatim Responses to Open Ended Question ................................. 26 The National Citizen Survey™ © 2001-2019 National Research Center, Inc. The NCS™ is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA. NRC is a charter member of the AAPOR Transparency Initiative, providing clear disclosure of our sound and ethical survey research practices. About this Report As part of its participation in The National Citizen Survey™, Marin County conducted a mailed survey of 3,200 residents. Surveys were mailed to randomly selected households in November 2018 and data were collected through December 31, 2018. After the official data collection period was underway (see the report, The National Citizen Survey: Community Livability Report, Marin County, CA, 2018), the County made available a web-based survey to its residents through a link on the County’s website, the County also offered hard-copy surveys of the opt-in survey to residents. The opt-in survey was available in English, Spanish and Vietnamese. Marin County residents were able to complete the opt-in survey during December 2018 and January 2019, and 3,068 surveys were received. Of the 3,068 opt-in surveys received, 34 were completed by mail and 3,034 were completed online (of these, 3,041 were completed in English, 26 in Spanish and one in Vietnamese). The demographic characteristics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2010 Census and American Community Survey estimates for adults in Marin County. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were tenure, housing unit type, race, ethnicity, sex and age. No adjustments were made for design effects. The results of the weighting scheme are presented in the following table. Table 1: Marin County, CA 2019 Supplemental Web Results Weighting Table Characteristic 2010 Census Unweighted Data Weighted Data Housing Rent home 37% 17% 33% Own home 63% 83% 67% Detached unit* 64% 78% 68% Attached unit* 36% 22% 32% Race and Ethnicity White 83% 87% 83% Not white 17% 13% 17% Not Hispanic 86% 94% 89% Hispanic 14% 6% 11% Sex and Age Female 53% 66% 55% Male 47% 34% 45% 18-34 years of age 19% 5% 14% 35-54 years of age 39% 28% 40% 55+ years of age 42% 67% 47% Females 18-34 9% 3% 8% Females 35-54 21% 17% 21% Females 55+ 23% 46% 26% Males 18-34 10% 12% 7% Males 35-54 19% 9% 18% Males 55+ 19% 24% 20% * U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates 1 The National Citizen Survey™ Complete Survey Responses The following pages contain a complete set of responses to each question on the survey, excluding the “don’t know” responses. The percent of respondents giving a particular response is shown followed by the number of respondents (denoted with “N=”). Responses excluding “don’t know” Table 2: Question 1 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Marin County: Excellent Good Fair Poor Total Marin County as a place to live 42% N=1271 47% N=1435 9% N=263 2% N=67 100% N=3036 Your neighborhood as a place to live 46% N=1356 43% N=1241 9% N=260 2% N=60 100% N=2916 Marin County as a place to raise children 36% N=902 46% N=1146 16% N=387 2% N=62 100% N=2497 Marin County as a place to work 23% N=550 41% N=992 25% N=608 11% N=256 100% N=2406 Marin County as a place to visit 52% N=1454 37% N=1051 9% N=258 2% N=45 100% N=2808 Marin County as a place to retire 19% N=480 28% N=715 26% N=673 28% N=720 100% N=2587 The overall quality of life in Marin County 31% N=909 53% N=1546 13% N=381 2% N=60 100% N=2897 Table 3: Question 2 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Marin County as a whole: Excellent Good Fair Poor Total Overall feeling of safety in Marin County 40% N=1156 50% N=1466 9% N=252 2% N=51 100% N=2926 Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit 10% N=296 39% N=1111 35% N=986 16% N=443 100% N=2836 Quality of overall natural environment in Marin County 66% N=1865 29% N=810 5% N=142 0% N=11 100% N=2828 Overall "built environment" of Marin County (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems) 8% N=216 46% N=1292 35% N=976 12% N=328 100% N=2812 Health and wellness opportunities in Marin County 32% N=877 49% N=1352 14% N=391 4% N=115 100% N=2735 Overall opportunities for education and enrichment 28% N=757 49% N=1312 19% N=507 5% N=126 100% N=2702 Overall economic health of Marin County 19% N=506 50% N=1331 22% N=597 9% N=233 100% N=2666 Sense of community 13% N=359 42% N=1181 33% N=927 12% N=332 100% N=2799 Overall image or reputation of Marin County 24% N=669 49% N=1348 21% N=574 7% N=184 100% N=2775 Table 4: Question 3 Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following: Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Total Recommend living in Marin County to someone who asks 34% N=970 39% N=1123 16% N=474 11% N=315 100% N=2881 Remain in Marin County for the next five years 56% N=1536 25% N=679 11% N=306 8% N=226 100% N=2748 2 The National Citizen Survey™ Table 5: Question 4 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Total In your neighborhood during the day 72% N=2008 21% N=599 4% N=114 3% N=74 0% N=13 100% N=2809 Table 6: Question 5 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Marin County as a whole: Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Total Traffic flow on major streets 2% N=42 22% N=631 41% N=1150 36% N=1005 0% N=0 100% N=2829 Ease of public parking 6% N=158 37% N=1017 39% N=1064 19% N=509 0% N=0 100% N=2747 Ease of travel by car in Marin County 5% N=130 37% N=1016 39% N=1063 20% N=545 0% N=0 100% N=2755 Ease of travel by public transportation in Marin County 2% N=52 16% N=348 34% N=726 47% N=1001 0% N=0 100% N=2127 Ease of travel by bicycle in Marin County 12% N=234 42% N=781 32% N=608 14% N=257 0% N=0 100% N=1880 Ease of walking in Marin County 18% N=476 47% N=1262 26% N=684 9% N=241 0% N=0 100% N=2663 Availability of paths and walking trails 34% N=894 46% N=1211 16% N=427 4% N=115 0% N=0 100% N=2647 Air quality 36% N=982 52% N=1434 10% N=288 2% N=46 0% N=0 100% N=2750 Cleanliness of Marin County 22% N=619 56% N=1539 17% N=455 5% N=142 0% N=0 100% N=2755 Overall appearance of Marin County 32% N=872 55% N=1509 11% N=305 3% N=69 0% N=0 100% N=2755 Public places where people want to spend time 24% N=653 51% N=1392 20% N=533 5% N=130 0% N=0 100% N=2709 Variety of housing options 3% N=80 14% N=362 33% N=868 50% N=1316 0% N=0 100% N=2626 Availability of affordable quality housing 2% N=42 4% N=109 17% N=440 77% N=1965 0% N=0 100% N=2556 Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) 44% N=1179 42% N=1139 12% N=324 2% N=60 0% N=0 100% N=2701 Recreational opportunities 44% N=1172 42% N=1142 11% N=298 3% N=76 0% N=0 100% N=2687 Availability of affordable quality food 15% N=415 41% N=1126 32% N=883 11% N=297 0% N=0 100% N=2720 Availability of affordable quality health care 15% N=386 42% N=1055 29% N=720 13% N=332 0% N=0 100% N=2493 Availability of preventive health services 20% N=476 49% N=1151 23% N=527 8% N=181 0% N=0 100% N=2335 Availability of affordable quality mental health care 8% N=137 29% N=469 32% N=521 30% N=489 0% N=0 100% N=1615 Accessibility of County programs, services and activities to people with disabilities 6% N=179 15% N=416 13% N=352 7% N=202 58% N=1611 100% N=2761 Table 7: Question 6 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Marin County as a whole: Excellent Good Fair Poor Total Availability of affordable quality child care/preschool 7% N=93 25% N=355 34% N=481 35% N=496 100% N=1424 K-12 education 28% N=554 48% N=958 18% N=361 6% N=127 100% N=2000 Adult educational opportunities 20% N=426 51% N=1089 24% N=506 6% N=126 100% N=2147 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities 20% N=522 49% N=1268 25% N=634 6% N=161 100% N=2585 3 The National Citizen Survey™ Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Marin County as a whole: Excellent Good Fair Poor Total Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and activities 29% N=524 54% N=976 14% N=245 3% N=60 100% N=1805 Employment opportunities 6% N=124 34% N=703 39% N=814 21% N=441 100% N=2083 Shopping opportunities 20% N=524 52% N=1389 23% N=602 5% N=139 100% N=2653 Cost of living in Marin County 1% N=27 5% N=130 29% N=790 65% N=1735 100% N=2681 Overall quality of business and service establishments in Marin County 12% N=316 61% N=1608 24% N=649 3% N=84 100% N=2657 Overall quality of new development in Marin County 4% N=80 30% N=617 40% N=825 26% N=537 100% N=2060 Opportunities to participate in social events and activities 17% N=428 53% N=1342 24% N=605 6% N=146 100% N=2521 Opportunities to volunteer 37% N=880 49% N=1156 13% N=302 1% N=29 100% N=2368 Opportunities to participate in community matters 23% N=564 53% N=1273 19% N=460 5% N=124 100% N=2420 Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds 11% N=268 36% N=900 33% N=837 20% N=505 100% N=2510 Neighborliness of residents in Marin County 10% N=268 40% N=1064 36% N=966 13% N=357 100% N=2656 Table 8: Question 7 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 200 Protest War Taxes, Military International Workers Day AS
    Volume 8, Number 14 U.C. San Diego 16th yearof publication April 19--May2, 1983 SanDiego Protests Target U.5. Military... 200 ProtestWar Taxes,Military A numberof eventsoccured last week the San Diego community,due to its in the San Diego community. From conser,,atismand the percentageof April10 through16 was National.lobs militaDand Federal retirees. In pointof withPeace Week. which had as its locus fact.the lailureof the rallyand its ho~ ourtax mone}is beingspent. It ~as organizersto definea politicalposition preceedcdon April9 by a rail,,,for Social on the issue also contributedto the Security. event’smoderate turnout. I n t heir’effort lhe April9Rally, held in BalboaPark to draw.the broadestpossible support IromI t~ 3 pm, was sponsoredby a wide for continuingSocial Security and rangeof senior,disabled, retired and protestagainst Reagan administr~,ti.n labor organizations,but drew’ only cuts.they watereddown the issueand about250 people. ’I he rallyfeatured a nearl}extinguished its militancy.Iotop key-notespeaker, a,, well as a numberoi it all off. local Mayoralcandidates 3-minute speeches fron| people Maureen ()’Connor and Roger representing various community Hedgecock made obligator} constituencies.A number of the speakers appearancesto garner ~otes. condemnedReagan, and one made the April15 haslong beena focus for anti- obvious connection between social war tax demonstrationsin ,";anI)iego servicecuts and increasesin military and around the nation, organized r ¯ principlyby the War ResistersLeague. Thousandswitness Tax Day Protestas motoristsdrive past picketers INSIDE THIS ISSUE: ~his year provedtO be no exception local War Resistersleague members, Draft Update along with membersof Red and Black Action.started earh. to organizeFax AS Elections:Politics AS Usual Lowery Speaks Out i)a~protests.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005-2006 Legislative Index
    CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 2005–06 REGULAR SESSION 2005–06 FIRST EXTRAORDINARY SESSION 2005–06 SECOND EXTRAORDINARY SESSION PART 1 LEGISLATIVE INDEX and PART 2 TABLE OF SECTIONS AFFECTED FINAL EDITION November 30, 2006 GREGORY SCHMIDT E. DOTSON WILSON Secretary of the Senate Chief Clerk of the Assembly Compiled by DIANE F. BOYER-VINE Legislative Counsel LEGISLATIVE INDEX TO BILLS, CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS, JOINT AND CONCURRENT RESOLUTIONS, AND SINGLE-HOUSE RESOLUTIONS 2005–06 Regular Session 2005–06 First Extraordinary Session 2005–06 Second Extraordinary Session PREFACE This publication consists of an index to measures and a table of sections affected. It is cumulative and periodically published. INDEX The index indicates the subject of each bill, constitutional amendment, and resolution as introduced and as amended. Entries are not removed from the index when subject matter is deleted from the measure in course of passage. TABLE The table shows each section of the Constitution, codes, and uncodified laws affected by measures introduced in the Legislature. It may be used in two ways: 1. As a means of locating measures where the section of the Constitution, code, or law is known. 2. To locate measures upon a particular subject, by using a published index to the codes and laws, such as Deering’s General Index, the Larmac Consolidated Index, and West’s General Index, to locate the existing sections, and then by using this table to locate the measures which affect those sections. The table is arranged by codes and the Constitution listed in alphabeti- cal order. Uncodified laws are listed at the end of the table under the heading ‘‘Statutes Other Than Codes,’’ and are cited by year and chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Forum Booklet
    Spring Forum March 27, 2009 – Stanford Law School March 27, 2009 – Stanford Law School 1 2 Roadmap to Justice Spring Forum Table of Contents Welcome...............................................................................................5 Forum Agenda....................................................................................7 Participant Roster.............................................................................9 Co­Sponsor and Participant Biographies............................... 13 March 27, 2009 – Stanford Law School 3 4 Roadmap to Justice Spring Forum Welcome Equal justice under the law is one of America’s most proudly proclaimed and widely violated legal principles. It embellishes courthouse entries, ceremonial occasions, and an occasional constitutional decision. But it comes nowhere close to describing the justice system in practice. Millions of Americans lack any access to the system, let alone equal access. It is a shameful irony that our nation, which has the world’s greatest concentration of lawyers, also has one of the least adequate systems for legal assistance. It is more shameful still that the inadequacies attract so little concern. The Roadmap to Justice Project seeks to bring greater visibility and expertise to this issue. Its goal is to draw leaders in the field together to chart a national agenda for access to justice for those who need it most. Through a series of structured conversations with leading experts, we hope to develop a plausible plan for the reorganization of legal processes, ethical rules, court procedures, and pro bono programs. This forum, sponsored by the Stanford Center on the Legal Profession and the Sokolove Charitable Fund, provides a starting point for an ongoing effort to turn the tide on this increasingly significant issue. We thank you for joining us. Deborah L. Rhode James G.
    [Show full text]
  • There's a Skid Row Everywhere, and This Is Just
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2016 There’s a Skid Row Everywhere, and This is Just the Headquarters: Impacts of Urban Revitalization Policies in the Homeless Community of Skid Row Douglas Mungin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Mungin, Douglas, "There’s a Skid Row Everywhere, and This is Just the Headquarters: Impacts of Urban Revitalization Policies in the Homeless Community of Skid Row" (2016). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1693. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1693 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THERE’S A SKID ROW EVERYWHERE, AND THIS IS JUST THE HEADQUARTERS: IMPACTS OF URBAN REVITALIZATION POLICIES IN THE HOMELESS COMMUNITY OF SKID ROW A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Communication Studies by Douglas Mungin B.A., San Francisco State University, 2007 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2012 August 2016 Acknowledgements Thanks for taking this journey with me my ocean and little professor. This project would not be in existence if it were not for the tremendous support and guidance from my advisor Rachel Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Level Moment of Meditation
    MIDDLETOWN CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY, December 17, 2019 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING – 5:30 PM – COUNCIL CHAMBERS – LOWER LEVEL MOMENT OF MEDITATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG/ ROLL CALL PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearing: Map Amendment Case #4-19: A request by applicant Joshua Liles with Apex Engineering & Surveying, Inc. on behalf of the property owner Middletown Fuel Services LLC., for a map amendment to rezone the property located at 1407 Winona Drive, Middletown, OH 45044 (Parcel ID: Q6511031000115) from R-3 Residential Zoning District to B-2: Community Business Zoning District. The property is a total of 0.28 acres. Public Hearing: Text Amendment Case #3-19: Planning & Zoning Division’s Middletown Development Code: Consideration of text amendments to the Middletown Development Code pertaining to the Chapter 1212: Historic Preservation, Chapter 1226: Review Authority and Procedures, and Chapter 1230: Definitions. CITIZEN COMMENTS, GUESTS, ORGANIZATIONS’ REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORTS CONSENT AGENDA. Matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion and one vote of consent. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed and considered separately. (a) Approve the City Council minutes from October 15 & 29, November 5 & 19, December 3, 2019 (b) Receive and File Board and Commission minutes: Middletown Visitors Bureau- October 21, 2019 Board of Health- November 12, 2019 (c) Confirm the personnel appointments of: Jesse Schulte
    [Show full text]
  • Communication from Public
    Communication from Public Name: Kendall Mayhew Date Submitted: 07/28/2019 10:36 PM Council File No: 14-1057-S8 Comments for Public Posting: I implore the council to oppose this policy that would further criminalize our unhoused neighbors. The state constitution has been upheld again and again in regards to these disgusting efforts to dehumanize vulnerable members of our community. We all have the right to exist in public spaces. Communication from Public Name: Brad Jones Date Submitted: 07/28/2019 11:11 PM Council File No: 14-1057-S8 Comments for Public Posting: I urge the city council to reinstate LAMC 85.02 - the ban on living in vehicles near schools, parks or in residential neighborhoods. Owners of vehicles are preying on the homeless; letting them stay in vehicles overnight is not the right solution to the homeless problem. Communication from Public Name: Kate Corry-Saavedra Date Submitted: 07/28/2019 11:45 PM Council File No: 14-1057-S8 Comments for Public Posting: My name is Kate Corry-Saavedra and I am a resident of Country Club Park in CD10. I strongly oppose reauthorizing LAMC 85.02 as written. In our current homelessness crisis, many Angelenos use their vehicle not only as transportation but as shelter. 85.02 criminalizes this necessary action in the VAST majority of Los Angeles. Navigating these rules is complicated and unreasonable for those experiencing homelessness. 85.02 will force individuals out of their cars into tents on the street - a more complicated situation for them and for all of us. Support our neighbors living out of their cars by voting against the reauthorization of 85.02.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeless Youth and the Bring LA Home Campaign to End Homelessness Windyn Hines
    Homeless Youth and the Bring LA Home Campaign to End Homelessness Windyn Hines Contents: Executive Summary 5 Introduction 6 Chapter 1: Literature Review 9 Chapter 2: Methods 31 Chapter 3: Bring LA Home! A Campaign to End Homelessness 35 Chapter 4: Youth Ad Hoc Group Recommendations 46 Chapter 5: Interviews with LAHSA, LACEH&H, and Service Providers to Homeless Youth 50 Chapter 6: Model Programming 57 Chapter 7: Sanggar Anak Akar 64 Conclusion 70 Appendix A: NAEH 10 Recommendations to End Youth Homelessness 73 Appendix B: Guide to Youth Housing Options 74 Appendix C: Explanation of Organizations 75 Endnotes 80 Works Cited 87 Index of Terms 93 Dedicated to Lola Marie and future homeless young people I want to send my special thanks to Heather Carmichael from My Friend’s Place, as well as to Ryanne Plaisance from Los Angeles Youth Network for your passion and creativity. 2 Thank you, also, to the Coordinating Council for Runaway and Homeless Youth for your patience and vision. Thank you to Natalie for your companionship, understanding, and belief in me. To my mom, Susan, brothers, Jarrett and Jonas, sister, Jeanne, and soul, Magen, as well as my surrogate family here in Los Angeles, Kathy, Irma, and Katy, I am forever indebted to you for your unconditional love and support. Thank you for allowing me to fail. I would be truly lost without you. Finally, to Donna Rowe and Youth in Transition in Albuquerque and Ibe Karyanto and the community of Sanggar Anak Akar in Jakarta, THANK YOU! My experiences working with you have changed my life forever.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychotropic Medication in California: a Prescription for Alternative Approaches
    PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION IN CALIFORNIA: A PRESCRIPTION FOR ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES DAVID H. NEEDHAM* Miss FLINN. It's just medication, Mr. Taber, good for you. Down it goes, now. MR. TABER. But I mean what kind of medication .... Miss, I don't like to create trouble. But I don't like to swallow something without knowing what it is, neither. How do I know this isn't one of those funny pills that makes me something I'm not? - Ken Kesey, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest I. INTRODUCTION An eleven-year-old girl from Los Angeles exhibits the normal tendencies of a preteen: she throws tantrums, is combative, and shows fear.' To be on the safe side, her mother brings her to a psychiatrist.2 The girl leaves the appointment with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and a prescription for ten different psychotropic medications-a mix of antimanics, anticonvulsants, and antipsychotics.3 Her mother's choice is not an easy one. Acting for her daughter's future-self based on scant Law Clerk, United States District Court for the Central District of California. Juris Doctor, University of Southern California Gould School of Law, 2012. Saks Mental Health Institute Scholar. I would like to thank Professor Elyn Saks, the editors of this journal, and my parents. 1 Melissa Healy, The Push to Label, L.A. TIMES (Nov. 5, 2007), http://articles.latimes.com /print/2007/nov/05/health/he-psychkids5. 2 id. 3id. 233 234 REVIEWOFLA WAND SOCIAL JUSTICE [Vol.22:2 information on the side effects of psychotropic medications on children, "suspicion that the psychiatric profession is as confused about diagnosing and treating mental illness in children as she is," 4 and the potential of turning her daughter into a lifelong patient when her "problems" may disappear with age, should the mother refuse or medicate? Kelly Thomas of Orange County was diagnosed with schizophrenia in his early twenties.
    [Show full text]
  • Revive Santa Ana Survey Results
    Revive Santa Ana Survey Results 1. How can the City best help in COVID-19 health recovery efforts? Responses English Spanish Vietnamese Total Percent Connect residents with pandemic-related resources 759 115 4 878 57.4% Address health inequity issues related to pandemic health 682 77 5 764 50.0% COVID-19 and vaccine education and outreach 650 61 0 711 46.5% Better public access to vaccines 603 82 4 689 45.1% More COVID-19 testing 174 26 6 206 13.5% Total Responses 1340 182 7 1529 100.0% 2. Which of these programs would best help Santa Ana’s neediest residents? Responses English Spanish Vietnamese Total Percent Rental assistance 867 117 3 987 63.6% Childcare assistance 741 53 6 800 51.5% After-school programs 683 56 4 743 47.8% Debit cards to shop in Santa Ana 464 94 0 558 35.9% Forgive past-due water bills 475 67 5 547 35.2% Total Responses 1364 182 7 1553 100.0% 3. Which of these assistance programs would best serve the overall community? Responses English Spanish Vietnamese Total Percent Small business support 740 95 4 839 53.8% Early childhood education 701 79 5 785 50.3% Affordable internet 664 101 3 768 49.2% Arts programs 354 47 2 403 25.8% More services at City’s Family Justice Center 0 57 2 59 3.8% Total Responses 1373 181 6 1560 100.0% 4. Which of these programs are the best way to address public health? Responses English Spanish Vietnamese Total Percent Housing and health services for the homeless 838 91 3 932 60.2% Health access for residents 758 101 5 864 55.9% Investigate health hazards in Santa Ana 472 78 6 556 35.9% A stronger City role in community health 301 66 1 368 23.8% Health education for residents 277 60 4 341 22.0% Total Responses 1359 181 7 1547 100.0% 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 200930002.Pdf
    Agenda Meeting Location: Council Chambers Land Use and Livability Subcommittee 200 W. Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 *Special Meeting* Wednesday, September 30, 2020 10:00 AM phoenix.gov OPTIONS TO ACCESS THIS MEETING - Watch the meeting live streamed on phoenix.gov or Phoenix Channel 11 on Cox Cable. - Call-in to listen to the meeting. Dial 602-666-0783 and Enter Meeting ID 126 397 9875# (for English) or 126 776 7609# (for Spanish). Press # again when prompted for attendee ID. - Register and speak during a meeting: - Register online by visiting the City Council Meetings page on phoenix.gov at least 1 hour prior to the start of this meeting. Then, click on this link at the time of the meeting and join the Webex to speak. https://phoenixcitycouncil.webex.com/phoenixcitycouncil/onstage/g.php? MTID=ed97dd614e0736709c80f6dab9904593a - Register via telephone at 602-262-6001 at least 1 hour prior to the start of this meeting, noting the item number. Then, use the Call-in phone number and Meeting ID listed above at the time of the meeting to call-in and speak. City of Phoenix Printed on 9/23/2020 Page 1 of 218 Land Use and Livability Agenda September 30, 2020 Subcommittee CALL TO ORDER CALL TO THE PUBLIC INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION (ITEM 1) 1 City of Phoenix Homelessness Outreach Plan Update Page 4 This report provides the Land Use and Livability Subcommittee with an update on the City of Phoenix Strategies to Address Homelessness Plan outreach efforts. THIS ITEM IS FOR INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION. Responsible Department This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Human Services Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Outside in Program Evaluation
    Outside In Program Evaluation September 2019 Health and Wellness Administrative Division, Research and Evaluation Unit RAMSEY COUNTY Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge Outside In partner agencies for their assistance with this evaluation. In particular, David Katzenmeyer of People Incorporated, patiently answered questions, ensured client data entry, explained their process and data, and helped to arrange the client interviews which ultimately could not be scheduled. Mary Kay Bailey and Ellen Watters, consultants that facilitated the project, were invaluable in answering questions, providing documents, and making themselves accessible throughout. Thank you to the Design and Governance Teams for welcoming the evaluation team to your meetings and putting up with our snooping. This evaluation was a joint effort of the Ramsey County Health and Wellness Administrative Division’s Research and Evaluation Unit. Mark Herzfeld, Sarah Myott, Allan Malkis, Kathy Gilmore, Wolde Selameabe, Larry Timmerman, Azra Thakur, and Jessica Jerney all contributed to the evaluation and report. Administrative assistance and coordination were provided by Julie Jones. Dana DeMaster, principal evaluator and supervisor This report was revised in October 2019 and is the final version. RAMSEY COUNTY Executive Summary Outside In is a collaboration brought together by the Saint Paul Foundation and Ramsey County to address unsheltered homelessness in downtown Saint Paul. The collaboration grew out of the Ramsey Re-directing Users of Shelter to Housing (RUSH) project, which focused on the top 100 longest shelter users at Catholic Charities Higher Ground/Dorothy Day shelter. The Outside In Design Team began meeting in May 2017 with the task of recommending goals and strategies for the initiative to the Governance Team.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2008 Programming Report
    PROGRAMMING REPORT KPCC + KUOR January - March 2008 Key Program Title Date Time Guest(s) NEWS Federal government to start handing out digita TECH TV converter coupons 1/1/08 1:00 Valot ENT Late night TV Shows coming back 1/2/08 1:00 Devall ENV A trio of winter storms is heading our wa 1/2/08 1:00 Roman POLI Californians call Iowa for their candidate 1/3/08 1:00 Stoltze Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert set to return to ENT fresh broadcast 1/7/08 1:00 Watt HEAL Report on overdose errors at Cedars-Sina 1/10/08 1:00 Roman ENT Street in Lakewood after Hedda Hoppe 1/13/08 1:00 Felde John Edwards rallies supporters at union POLI headquarters 1/17/08 1:00 Felde TRANS Streets in Lakewood have ties to radi 1/26/08 1:00 Felde POLI Party boss pleased about tight race 2/1/08 1:00 Felde HIST Mormon temple almost built in Mar Vist 1/6/08 1:01 Felde Boy wins lawmaker's essay contest, his ideas IE might become law 1/14/08 1:01 Vbaer Cal State trustees remove civility warning in EDU student conduct code 1/22/08 1:01 Guzman Verdugo Road named after Corporal in Spanish HIST army 1/19/08 1:02 Felde LA Unified administrators lobby against a cut to EDU school district health programs 1/23/08 1:02 Guzman OBIT Honorary mayor of Hollywood die 1/10/08 1:03 Felde Video shows OC Sheriff's deputies using Taser OC on restrained man 1/23/08 1:03 Valot TRANS Mayor Villaraigosa unveils traffic relief initiatives 1/29/08 1:03 Watt ART On the parade rout on Colorado Blv 1/1/08 1:04 Xaykaothao Reaction to Schwarzenegger's proposed cuts to EDU the education budget 1/10/08 1:04
    [Show full text]