Smlreschbibliography(Oct 2015)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Primer Registro Para El Neotrópico De La Familia Artheneidae Stål, 1872
www.biotaxa.org/rce. ISSN 0718-8994 (online) Revista Chilena de Entomología (2021) 47 (2): 311-318. Nota Científica Primer registro para el Neotrópico de la familia Artheneidae Stål, 1872 (Heteroptera: Lygaeoidea), con la especie Holcocranum saturejae (Kolenati, 1845) introducida en Argentina First record for the Neotropics of the family Artheneidae Stål, 1872 (Heteroptera: Lygaeoidea), with the species Holcocranum saturejae (Kolenati, 1845) introduced in Argentina Diego L. Carpintero1, Alberto A. de Magistris2 y Eduardo I. Faúndez3* 1División Entomología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”. Av. Ángel Gallardo 470 (C1405DJR), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected]. 2Cátedras de Botánica Sistemática, y Ecología y Fitogeografía, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora, Ruta Provincial 4, Km 2 (1832), Llavallol, Partido de Lomas de Zamora, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected]. 3Laboratorio de entomología y salud pública, Instituto de la Patagonia, Universidad de Magallanes, Av. Bulnes 01855, Casilla 113-D, Punta Arenas, Chile. *[email protected] ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2C786219-0AE9-40A2-A175-E3C8750290A https://doi.org/10.35249/rche.47.2.21.17 Resumen. Se cita por primera vez para la Argentina a la especie Holcocranum saturejae (Kolenati) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Artheneidae), que se alimenta principalmente de totoras (Typha spp., Typhaceae) y, en menor medida de otras plantas, en base a una muestra proveniente de la Reserva Natural Provincial Santa Catalina en Lomas de Zamora, provincia de Buenos Aires. Se muestran imágenes de ejemplares recolectados y se dan sus caracteres diagnósticos. Se comenta brevemente la importancia de la aparición de esta especie en la Región Neotropical. -
Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States
Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States September 1993 OTA-F-565 NTIS order #PB94-107679 GPO stock #052-003-01347-9 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993). For Sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office ii Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop, SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN O-1 6-042075-X Foreword on-indigenous species (NIS)-----those species found beyond their natural ranges—are part and parcel of the U.S. landscape. Many are highly beneficial. Almost all U.S. crops and domesticated animals, many sport fish and aquiculture species, numerous horticultural plants, and most biologicalN control organisms have origins outside the country. A large number of NIS, however, cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. These harmful species are the focus of this study. The total number of harmful NIS and their cumulative impacts are creating a growing burden for the country. We cannot completely stop the tide of new harmful introductions. Perfect screening, detection, and control are technically impossible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the Federal and State policies designed to protect us from the worst species are not safeguarding our national interests in important areas. These conclusions have a number of policy implications. First, the Nation has no real national policy on harmful introductions; the current system is piecemeal, lacking adequate rigor and comprehensiveness. Second, many Federal and State statutes, regulations, and programs are not keeping pace with new and spreading non-indigenous pests. -
ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000). -
Lists of Names of Prokaryotic Candidatus Taxa
NOTIFICATION LIST: CANDIDATUS LIST NO. 1 Oren et al., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.003789 Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa Aharon Oren1,*, George M. Garrity2,3, Charles T. Parker3, Maria Chuvochina4 and Martha E. Trujillo5 Abstract We here present annotated lists of names of Candidatus taxa of prokaryotes with ranks between subspecies and class, pro- posed between the mid- 1990s, when the provisional status of Candidatus taxa was first established, and the end of 2018. Where necessary, corrected names are proposed that comply with the current provisions of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and its Orthography appendix. These lists, as well as updated lists of newly published names of Candidatus taxa with additions and corrections to the current lists to be published periodically in the International Journal of Systematic and Evo- lutionary Microbiology, may serve as the basis for the valid publication of the Candidatus names if and when the current propos- als to expand the type material for naming of prokaryotes to also include gene sequences of yet-uncultivated taxa is accepted by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Introduction of the category called Candidatus was first pro- morphology, basis of assignment as Candidatus, habitat, posed by Murray and Schleifer in 1994 [1]. The provisional metabolism and more. However, no such lists have yet been status Candidatus was intended for putative taxa of any rank published in the journal. that could not be described in sufficient details to warrant Currently, the nomenclature of Candidatus taxa is not covered establishment of a novel taxon, usually because of the absence by the rules of the Prokaryotic Code. -
Cultivation-Independent Methods Reveal Differences Among Bacterial Gut Microbiota in Triatomine Vectors of Chagas Disease
Cultivation-Independent Methods Reveal Differences among Bacterial Gut Microbiota in Triatomine Vectors of Chagas Disease Fabio Faria da Mota1, Lourena Pinheiro Marinho2, Carlos Jose´ de Carvalho Moreira3, Marli Maria Lima4, Cı´cero Brasileiro Mello5, Eloi Souza Garcia2, Nicolas Carels6*, Patricia Azambuja2 1 Laborato´rio de Biologia Computacional e Sistemas, IOC, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2 Laborato´rio de Bioquı´mica e Fisiologia de Insetos, IOC, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 Laborato´rio de Doenc¸as Parasita´rias, IOC, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 4 Laborato´rio de Ecoepidemiologia da Doenc¸a de Chagas, IOC, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 5 Laborato´rio de Biologia de Insetos, UFF, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 6 Laborato´rio de Genoˆmica Funcional e Bioinforma´tica, IOC, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Abstract Background: Chagas disease is a trypanosomiasis whose agent is the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, which is transmitted to humans by hematophagous bugs known as triatomines. Even though insecticide treatments allow effective control of these bugs in most Latin American countries where Chagas disease is endemic, the disease still affects a large proportion of the population of South America. The features of the disease in humans have been extensively studied, and the genome of the parasite has been sequenced, but no effective drug is yet available to treat Chagas disease. The digestive tract of the insect vectors in which T. cruzi develops has been much less well investigated than blood from its human hosts and constitutes a dynamic environment with very different conditions. Thus, we investigated the composition of the predominant bacterial species of the microbiota in insect vectors from Rhodnius, Triatoma, Panstrongylus and Dipetalogaster genera. -
PDF File Includes: 46 Main Text Supporting Information Appendix 47 Figures 1 to 4 Figures S1 to S7 48 Tables 1 to 2 Tables S1 to S2 49 50
UVicSPACE: Research & Learning Repository _____________________________________________________________ Faculty of Science Faculty Publications _____________________________________________________________ This is a post-print version of the following article: Multiple origins of obligate nematode and insect symbionts by a clade of bacteria closely related to plant pathogens Vincent G. Martinson, Ryan M. R. Gawryluk, Brent E. Gowen, Caitlin I. Curtis, John Jaenike, & Steve J. Perlman December 2020 The final publication is available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2000860117 Citation for this paper: Martinson, V. G., Gawryluk, R. M. R., Gowen, B. E., Curits, C. I., Jaenike, J., & Perlman, S. J. (2020). Multiple origins of obligate nematode and insect symbionts by a clade of bacteria closely related to plant pathogens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(50), 31979-31986. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2000860117. 1 Accepted Manuscript: 2 3 Martinson VG, Gawryluk RMR, Gowen BE, Curtis CI, Jaenike J, Perlman SJ. 2020. Multiple 4 origins of oBligate nematode and insect symBionts By a clade of Bacteria closely related to plant 5 pathogens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 117, 31979-31986. 6 doi/10.1073/pnas.2000860117 7 8 Main Manuscript for 9 Multiple origins of oBligate nematode and insect symBionts By memBers of 10 a newly characterized Bacterial clade 11 12 13 Authors. 14 Vincent G. Martinson1,2, Ryan M. R. Gawryluk3, Brent E. Gowen3, Caitlin I. Curtis3, John Jaenike1, Steve 15 J. Perlman3 16 1 Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA, 14627 17 2 Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, AlBuquerque, NM, USA, 87131 18 3 Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada, V8W 3N5 19 20 Corresponding author. -
Hemiptera of Canada 277 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.819.26574 REVIEW ARTICLE Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 819: 277–290 (2019) Hemiptera of Canada 277 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.819.26574 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Hemiptera of Canada Robert G. Foottit1, H. Eric L. Maw1, Joel H. Kits1, Geoffrey G. E. Scudder2 1 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre and Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K. W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada 2 Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada Corresponding author: Robert G. Foottit ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Langor | Received 10 May 2018 | Accepted 10 July 2018 | Published 24 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/64A417ED-7BB4-4683-ADAA-191FACA22F24 Citation: Foottit RG, Maw HEL, Kits JH, Scudder GGE (2019) Hemiptera of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 277–290. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.26574 Abstract The Canadian Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha, Auchenorrhyncha, and Heteroptera) fauna is reviewed, which currently comprises 4011 species, including 405 non-native species. DNA barcodes available for Canadian specimens are represented by 3275 BINs. The analysis was based on the most recent checklist of Hemiptera in Canada (Maw et al. 2000) and subsequent collection records, literature records and compilation of DNA barcode data. It is estimated that almost 600 additional species remain to be dis- covered among Canadian Hemiptera. Keywords Barcode Index Number (BIN), biodiversity assessment, Biota of Canada, DNA barcodes, Hemiptera, true bugs The order Hemiptera, the true bugs, is a relatively large order. -
Heteròpters De Catalunya
A B C D E F G H I J Heteròpters de Catalunya - Marta Goula, Víctor Osorio, Jan Tomàs i Marcos Roca-Cusachs; Universitat de Barcelona - Octubre 2019 1 2 Taxonomia Origen i endemisme Amenaça Protecció Conservació Atlas y Libro Rojo de los Catàleg de fauna Invertebrats que requereixen Reial Decret Família Espècie Endemisme Invertebrados Amenazados DECRET 328/1992 PEIN amenaçada mesures de conservació a Actuacions Estudis moleculars 630/2013 de España (2011) (proposta 2019) Catalunya (ICHN 2008; 2010) 3 4 Tingidae Laporte, 1832 Acalypta brunnea (Germar, 1837) Autòctona 5 Tingidae Laporte, 1832 Acalypta carinata (Panzer, 1806) Autòctona 6 Tingidae Laporte, 1832 Acalypta gracilis gracilis (Fieber, 1844) Autòctona 7 Tingidae Laporte, 1832 Acalypta hellenica Reuter, 1888 Autòctona 8 Tingidae Laporte, 1832 Acalypta musci (Schrank, 1781) Autòctona 9 Tingidae Laporte, 1832 Acalypta nigrina (Fallén, 1807) Autòctona Annex, vulnerable Inclosa 10 Tingidae Laporte, 1832 Acalypta nigrinervis Stål, 1874 Autòctona 11 Tingidae Laporte, 1832 Acalypta parvula (Fallén, 1807) Autòctona 12 Tingidae Laporte, 1832 Acalypta suturalis (Puton, 1879) Autòctona 13 Acanthosomatidae Signoret, 1864 Acanthosoma haemorrhoidale haemorrhoidale (Linnaeus, 1758) Autòctona 14 Miridae Hahn, 1833 Acetropis (Acetropis) carinata (Herrich-Schaeffer, 1841) Autòctona 15 Miridae Hahn, 1833 Acetropis (Acetropis) gimmerthalii gimmerthalii (Flor,1860) Autòctona 16 Anthocoridae Fieber, 1836 Acompocoris alpinus Reuter, 1875 Autòctona 17 Rhyparochromidae Amyot & Serville, 1843 Acompus laticeps -
Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the U.S
Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States September 1993 OTA-F-565 NTIS order #PB94-107679 GPO stock #052-003-01347-9 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993). For Sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office ii Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop, SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN O-1 6-042075-X Foreword on-indigenous species (NIS)-----those species found beyond their natural ranges—are part and parcel of the U.S. landscape. Many are highly beneficial. Almost all U.S. crops and domesticated animals, many sport fish and aquiculture species, numerous horticultural plants, and most biologicalN control organisms have origins outside the country. A large number of NIS, however, cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. These harmful species are the focus of this study. The total number of harmful NIS and their cumulative impacts are creating a growing burden for the country. We cannot completely stop the tide of new harmful introductions. Perfect screening, detection, and control are technically impossible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the Federal and State policies designed to protect us from the worst species are not safeguarding our national interests in important areas. These conclusions have a number of policy implications. First, the Nation has no real national policy on harmful introductions; the current system is piecemeal, lacking adequate rigor and comprehensiveness. Second, many Federal and State statutes, regulations, and programs are not keeping pace with new and spreading non-indigenous pests. -
Multiple Origins of Obligate Nematode and Insect Symbionts by by a Clade of Bacteria Closely Related to Plant Pathogens
Multiple origins of obligate nematode and insect symbionts by by a clade of bacteria closely related to plant pathogens Vincent G. Martinsona,b,1, Ryan M. R. Gawrylukc, Brent E. Gowenc, Caitlin I. Curtisc, John Jaenikea, and Steve J. Perlmanc aDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14627; bDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131; and cDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3N5, Canada Edited by Joan E. Strassmann, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, and approved October 10, 2020 (received for review January 15, 2020) Obligate symbioses involving intracellular bacteria have trans- the symbiont Sodalis has independently given rise to numer- formed eukaryotic life, from providing aerobic respiration and ous obligate nutritional symbioses in blood-feeding flies and photosynthesis to enabling colonization of previously inaccessible lice, sap-feeding mealybugs, spittlebugs, hoppers, and grain- niches, such as feeding on xylem and phloem, and surviving in feeding weevils (9). deep-sea hydrothermal vents. A major challenge in the study of Less studied are young obligate symbioses in host lineages that obligate symbioses is to understand how they arise. Because the did not already house obligate symbionts (i.e., “symbiont-naive” best studied obligate symbioses are ancient, it is especially chal- hosts) (10). Some of the best known examples originate through lenging to identify early or intermediate stages. Here we report host manipulation by the symbiont via addiction or reproductive the discovery of a nascent obligate symbiosis in Howardula aor- control. Addiction or dependence may be a common route for onymphium, a well-studied nematode parasite of Drosophila flies. -
IUFRO World Series Vol. 19 Global Forest Decimal Classification
International Union of Forest Research Organizations Union Internationale des Instituts de Recherches Forestières Internationaler Verband Forstlicher Forschungsanstalten Unión Internacional de Organizaciones de Investigación Forestal IUFRO World Series Vol. 19 Global Forest Decimal Classification (GFDC) Globale Forstliche Dezimal- Klassifikation (GFDK) Editors: Barbara Holder Jarmo Saarikko Daryoush Voshmgir Prepared by IUFRO Working Party 6.03.03 Global Forest Decimal Classification ISSN 1016-3263 ISBN 3-901347-61-5 IUFRO, Vienna 2006 Recommended catalogue entry: Holder, B., Saarikko, J. and Voshmgir, D. 2006. Global Forest Decimal Classification (GFDC). IUFRO World Series Vol. 19. Vienna. 338 p. Classification: GFDC: 0--014, UDC: 025.45 Published by: IUFRO Headquarters, Vienna, Austria, 2006 © 2006 IUFRO IUFRO Headquarters c/o Mariabrunn (BFW) Hauptstrasse 7, A-1140 Vienna, Austria Tel.: +43-1-877 01 51-0; Fax: +43-1-877 01 51 -50 E-Mail: [email protected]; Internet: www.iufro.org Available from: IUFRO Headquarters (see above), and Library Austria Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape. Unit: Documentation, Publication & Library, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, A-1131 Vienna, Austria Tel.: +43-1-87838-1216; Fax: +43-1-87838-1215 E-Mail: [email protected]; Web: http://bfw.ac.at/ ISBN 3-901347-61-5 Price 35 Euro plus mailing costs Printed by: Austrian Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape (BFW) GFDC website: http://iufro.andornot.com/GFDCDefault.aspx Editors -
Biodiversity Summary: Burnett Mary, Queensland
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.