The Essays on Fundamental and Genetic Mineralogy: 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Essays on Fundamental and Genetic Mineralogy: 3 148 New Data on Minerals. М., 2008. Volume 43 THE ESSAYS ON FUNDAMENTAL AND GENETIC MINERALOGY: 3. MINERALS OF VARIABLE COMPOSITION WITH VARIABLE STRUCTURE AND PROBLEMS OF SPECIES FORMATION IN MINERALOGY. EUDIALYTE-EUCOLITES Boris Ye. Borutzky Institute of Ore Deposit, Geology, Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry, RAS, Moscow, [email protected] This paper is one of a series on genetic and fundamental mineralogy (Borutzky, 2005; 2006) where the problem of mineral species definition are discussed. In particular, the correlation of such fundamental terms in mineralogy as mineral – mineral species – mineral variety are considered, and compared to analogous nomenclature units in biology – another natural science. Also, the necessity for a genetic basis in mineral species definition is shown and the natural genetic taxonomy elaborated and applied to the feldspar group is demonstrated; this approach was used for the corresponding part in “Minerals” reference book (2003). The author insists that formalised structural and chemical criteria for mineral species recommended by the International Mineralogical Association (IMA) Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) without consideration of genesis dis- credits mineralogical science, because the result in unwarranted “reproduction” of abstract species which do not correspond to real discrete mineral entities widespread in certain geological environments. The paper is devoted to the detailed consideration of so-called minerals of variable composition and variable structure defined by the author (Borutzky, 1997; 1999) using the example of eudialyte-eucolites, and also the scientific and opportunistic problems accompanying the study of these chemically and structurally unique minerals. 6 figures, 111 references. Keywords: minerals of variable composition and variable structure, eudialytes-eucolites, new mineral species, the new mineral species criteria. If mineralogy is to be considered as a geological Thus a genetic approach to the problem of min- science1, i.e. – a natural historical science , then the eral species definition differs fundamentally from the minerals (the main form of inorganic matter exis- commonly accepted formal criteria, which are rec- tence in nature) should be studied in accordance ommended and used in the practice of new species with their development history: as they were formed approval by the IMA CNMNC. This approach is during geological processes and their continued based on objective evidence of independent mineral existence until their destruction or replacement by phase formation during geological-geochemical other minerals. This study considers the complexity processes; on the analysis of stability fields, real of chemical composition, real variations and crystal boundary changes during changing physical-chemi- structure modifications which change during crystal- cal mineral-forming conditions, analysis of specific lization and post-crystallization transformations geological environments and their affect on modifi- according to the physicochemical parameters of the cation of chemical composition and mineral struc- mineral-forming and mineral-retentive environment. ture. The main criterion for mineral species differenti- These principles are appropriately the most ation is the existence of independent stability fields applicable for the thoroughly studied, both struc- for the individual minerals in their totality with no turally and physical-chemically, rock-forming mine - drastic phase transitions boundaries, dissolution rals, for example alkaline feldspars (Borutzky, 2006). fields and with their chemical and structural individ- It is easy to show that real triclinic albite and micro- uality preserved. The most significant evidence of cline co-existing at low temperatures, contain not these are: crystal structure type and the preservation more than 5 and 10% of K- and Na-component of the main chemical components ratio. This does not respectively (which fundamentally differs from the exclude gradual variations of chemical composition CNMNC IMA “50% rule”), as they are divided by the within the stability field which could be accompanied solvus field. Chemical compositions of the high-tem- by some structural effects caused by adjustment to perature analbite (anorthoclase) and sanidine these changes; however these are to be considered as respectively vary from Ab100 at 980°C to Ab80Or20 at less significant, which, if they do not exceed the lim- 650°C, and from Or0–100 at 980° to Or90–100 at 500°C, its of a mineral species, be described as mineral vari- divided into two stability fields – triclinic Na- and eties. The most and least significant evidence corre- monoclinic K-feldspar, high-temperature solvus field lation is overviewed earlier (Borutzky, Urusov, 2008). and sloping straight line of non-quenching inversion 1 – Not all the scientists accept this: some chemists consider mineralogy as a part of chemistry, and physicists – as a part of physics. Others believe that there is no such science and the only task for mineralogists is minerals detecting. Geochemistry, petrology and lithology determine their formation conditions, patterns/rules of mineral and their associations and distribution within geological formations. However it is well known from experience that it is difficult to do without a fundamental knowledge of mineral matter. Evidently this is the reason why the above mentioned scientists rarely use mineralogical indicators during analy- sis of rock-forming conditions at the certain geological regions. The Essays on Fundamental and Genetic Mineralogy: 3. Minerals of Variable Composition and with Variable Structure and Problems of Species Formation in Mineralogy. Eudialyte-Eucolites 149 – C2/m ––>C1 (which also differs from the “50% Address to the opponents rule”). Above 980° all the compounds from Ab100 to Or form continuous isomorphous series of mono- «Science is to be divided into natural (the humani- 100 ties), unnatural (pervected) and perverted». clinic alkaline feldspars (the single stability field) Leo Landau that according to Lazarenko’s (1963) concept allows consideration as a single mineral species (we shall Traditional understanding of mineralogy was name it K,Na-sanidine, as it is not to be divided into inculcated upon the author by his teachers – mineral- two species due to its continuity). It is essential that ogists-geologists. Opponents (Rastsvetaeva, 2006; these seven determined mineral species are not Rastsvetaeva, Chukanov, 2006), inspired by fantastic invented but are being formed in real geological con- progress in structural analysis methods during recent ditions. At present not a single researcher familiar years, attempt (and not unsuccessfully) to impose with modern achievements in the feldspar matter purely crystallochemical understanding of mineralogy studies will conform to the rules of the CNMNC, as including speciation problems. It is most unlikely they this would be equivalent l to Stone Age concepts. would change their minds – this is “desease” of our The situation is more complex with rare and as time; moreover they are guided by officially accepted usual poorly understood minerals. Genetic criteria in CNMNC recommendations. However there is no way this case are hidden in structural interrelations of keeping silent regarding some of their remarks – it between the supposed mineral species. As mineral appears that they are either ignorant about the funda- species are discrete mineral entities with equal fea- mental distinctions of the genetic approach and the tures, then single whole individual (grain, crystal) essence of criticism of already known mineral species cannot contain several mineral species. From our formal reproduction (“cloning”), or deliberately mis- point of view, attribution of different crystal zones or lead readers arrogating to us arguments that were sectors to different mineral species according to the never expressed. formally applied dominance rule i.e. “50% rule” Thus, Ramiza K. Rastsvetaeva (2006) in the fore- (which is used at crystallochemically unequal posi- word of another “mineralogical tale”, reprinted from tion in structure percentage) is nonsense. The wide “Nature” magazine, assumes that the main “(author’s) spread application of this rule without genesis con- argument against mineral species “clonong”... is an sideration clear the boundless opportunities for anxiety that their number will overly increase”. This unwarranted “reproduction” of mineral species at “forgery” leads away from the main point. The problem the expense of former chemical and structural vari- is not in quantity but in quality of mineral species. eties of well-known minerals. Amongst living organisms there are millions of biolog- Intrastructural component substitutions (ion ical species, but they are all genetically well founded exchange) observed in mineral individuals, typical on observations in nature. On the basis of secondary, for zeolite-like structures, can cause certain difficul- minor features without being genetic ones, one can be ties. There are no phase boundaries within the grain, faced by incidents as happened with the butterfly however component contents tend to change slight- Ornithoptera paradisea (fig. 1). Similar dimorphism in ly from periphery towards the centre and along biology is widely spread. Of course no one will attrib- cracks. Minerals with variable chemical composition ute cock or peacock to one species and hen and pea- and variable crystal structure
Recommended publications
  • New Mineral Names*,†
    American Mineralogist, Volume 104, pages 625–629, 2019 New Mineral Names*,† DMITRIY I. BELAKOVSKIY1 AND FERNANDO CÁMARA2 1Fersman Mineralogical Museum, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskiy Prospekt 18 korp. 2, Moscow 119071, Russia 2Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra “Ardito Desio”, Universitá di degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli, 34, 20133 Milano, Italy IN THIS ISSUE This New Mineral Names has entries for 8 new minerals, including fengchengite, ferriperbøeite-(Ce), genplesite, heyerdahlite, millsite, saranchinaite, siudaite, vymazalováite and new data on lavinskyite-1M. FENGCHENGITE* X-ray diffraction pattern [d Å (I%; hkl)] are: 7.186 (55; 110), 5.761 (44; 113), 4.187 (53; 123), 3.201 (47; 028), 2.978 (61; 135). 2.857 (100; 044), G. Shen, J. Xu, P. Yao, and G. Li (2017) Fengchengite: A new species with 2.146 (30; 336), 1.771 (36; 24.11). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data the Na-poor but vacancy-dominante N(5) site in the eudialyte group. shows the mineral is trigonal, space group R3m, a = 14.2467 (6), c = Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 37 (1/2), 140–151. 30.033(2) Å, V = 5279.08 Å3, Z = 3. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined to R = 0.043 for all unique I > 2σ(I) reflections. Fengchengite (IMA 2007-018a), Na Ca (Fe3+,) Zr Si (Si O ) 12 3 6 3 3 25 73 Fenchengite is the Fe3+ analog of eudialyte with a structural difference (H O) (OH) , trigonal, is a new eudialyte-group mineral discovered in 2 3 2 in vacancy dominant N5 site and splitting its Na site N1 into N1a and the agpaitic nepheline syenites and its pegmatite facies near the Saima N1b sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Petrology of Nepheline Syenite Pegmatites in the Oslo Rift, Norway: Zr and Ti Mineral Assemblages in Miaskitic and Agpaitic Pegmatites in the Larvik Plutonic Complex
    MINERALOGIA, 44, No 3-4: 61-98, (2013) DOI: 10.2478/mipo-2013-0007 www.Mineralogia.pl MINERALOGICAL SOCIETY OF POLAND POLSKIE TOWARZYSTWO MINERALOGICZNE __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Original paper Petrology of nepheline syenite pegmatites in the Oslo Rift, Norway: Zr and Ti mineral assemblages in miaskitic and agpaitic pegmatites in the Larvik Plutonic Complex Tom ANDERSEN1*, Muriel ERAMBERT1, Alf Olav LARSEN2, Rune S. SELBEKK3 1 Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1047 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo Norway; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Statoil ASA, Hydroveien 67, N-3908 Porsgrunn, Norway 3 Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Sars gate 1, N-0562 Oslo, Norway * Corresponding author Received: December, 2010 Received in revised form: May 15, 2012 Accepted: June 1, 2012 Available online: November 5, 2012 Abstract. Agpaitic nepheline syenites have complex, Na-Ca-Zr-Ti minerals as the main hosts for zirconium and titanium, rather than zircon and titanite, which are characteristic for miaskitic rocks. The transition from a miaskitic to an agpaitic crystallization regime in silica-undersaturated magma has traditionally been related to increasing peralkalinity of the magma, but halogen and water contents are also important parameters. The Larvik Plutonic Complex (LPC) in the Permian Oslo Rift, Norway consists of intrusions of hypersolvus monzonite (larvikite), nepheline monzonite (lardalite) and nepheline syenite. Pegmatites ranging in composition from miaskitic syenite with or without nepheline to mildly agpaitic nepheline syenite are the latest products of magmatic differentiation in the complex. The pegmatites can be grouped in (at least) four distinct suites from their magmatic Ti and Zr silicate mineral assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Composition and Petrogenetic Implications of Eudialyte-Group Mineral in the Peralkaline Lovozero Complex, Kola Peninsula, Russia
    minerals Article Chemical Composition and Petrogenetic Implications of Eudialyte-Group Mineral in the Peralkaline Lovozero Complex, Kola Peninsula, Russia Lia Kogarko 1,* and Troels F. D. Nielsen 2 1 Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia 2 Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 23 September 2020; Accepted: 16 November 2020; Published: 20 November 2020 Abstract: Lovozero complex, the world’s largest layered peralkaline intrusive complex hosts gigantic deposits of Zr-, Hf-, Nb-, LREE-, and HREE-rich Eudialyte Group of Mineral (EGM). The petrographic relations of EGM change with time and advancing crystallization up from Phase II (differentiated complex) to Phase III (eudialyte complex). EGM is anhedral interstitial in all of Phase II which indicates that EGM nucleated late relative to the main rock-forming and liquidus minerals of Phase II. Saturation in remaining bulk melt with components needed for nucleation of EGM was reached after the crystallization about 85 vol. % of the intrusion. Early euhedral and idiomorphic EGM of Phase III crystalized in a large convective volume of melt together with other liquidus minerals and was affected by layering processes and formation of EGM ore. Consequently, a prerequisite for the formation of the ore deposit is saturation of the alkaline bulk magma with EGM. It follows that the potential for EGM ores in Lovozero is restricted to the parts of the complex that hosts cumulus EGM. Phase II with only anhedral and interstitial EGM is not promising for this type of ore.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter June 2006
    w NEWSLETTER INTERNATIONAL TUNGSTEN INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION Rue Père Eudore Devroye 245, 1150 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 770 8878 Fax: + 32 2 770 8898 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.itia.info The programme will begin on Tuesday Toxicologic Assessment for the Production and 19th evening with a Reception in the hotel jointly Mechanical Processing of Materials containing hosted by Tiberon Minerals and ITIA. Tungsten Heavy Metal. Not least will be an introduction to the formation of a Consortium to deal Working sessions will be held on Wednesday Annual with the implications of REACH on behalf of the and Thursday mornings and papers will tungsten industry, both legal and financial. include: General Readers will recall that REACH will place an obligation ▼ HSE work programme on individual companies to submit a technical dossier and register any chemical substance Meeting ▼ Ganzhou’s Tungsten Industry and Its Progress manufactured or imported into the EU in quantities ▼ Geostatistics in the mid and long-term planning for of more than 1 tonne. the Panasqueira deposit (Nuno Alves, Beralt Tin Tuesday 26 to and Wolfram) In order to assist companies with the registration process, the Commission recommends the creation ▼ Thursday 28 Paper by Zhuzhou Cemented Carbide of industry Consortia. These Consortia will enable the ▼ Update on Tiberon’s Development of Tungsten joint development, submission and sharing of September 2006 Mining in Vietnam information with the aim of reducing the compliance burden on individual companies and preventing ▼ Update on China’s Tungsten Industry Hyatt Regency Hotel, unnecessary additional animal testing. ▼ Update on US Tungsten Market (Dean Schiller, Boston, USA OsramSylvania Products) Both members and non-members will be equally ▼ Review of Trends in 2006 (Nigel Tunna, Metal-Pages) welcome to join the Consortium, saving themselves considerable amounts of money and time by so doing.
    [Show full text]
  • New Minerals Approved Bythe Ima Commission on New
    NEW MINERALS APPROVED BY THE IMA COMMISSION ON NEW MINERALS AND MINERAL NAMES ALLABOGDANITE, (Fe,Ni)l Allabogdanite, a mineral dimorphous with barringerite, was discovered in the Onello iron meteorite (Ni-rich ataxite) found in 1997 in the alluvium of the Bol'shoy Dolguchan River, a tributary of the Onello River, Aldan River basin, South Yakutia (Republic of Sakha- Yakutia), Russia. The mineral occurs as light straw-yellow, with strong metallic luster, lamellar crystals up to 0.0 I x 0.1 x 0.4 rnrn, typically twinned, in plessite. Associated minerals are nickel phosphide, schreibersite, awaruite and graphite (Britvin e.a., 2002b). Name: in honour of Alia Nikolaevna BOG DAN OVA (1947-2004), Russian crys- tallographer, for her contribution to the study of new minerals; Geological Institute of Kola Science Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity. fMA No.: 2000-038. TS: PU 1/18632. ALLOCHALCOSELITE, Cu+Cu~+PbOZ(Se03)P5 Allochalcoselite was found in the fumarole products of the Second cinder cone, Northern Breakthrought of the Tolbachik Main Fracture Eruption (1975-1976), Tolbachik Volcano, Kamchatka, Russia. It occurs as transparent dark brown pris- matic crystals up to 0.1 mm long. Associated minerals are cotunnite, sofiite, ilin- skite, georgbokiite and burn site (Vergasova e.a., 2005). Name: for the chemical composition: presence of selenium and different oxidation states of copper, from the Greek aA.Ao~(different) and xaAxo~ (copper). fMA No.: 2004-025. TS: no reliable information. ALSAKHAROVITE-Zn, NaSrKZn(Ti,Nb)JSi401ZJz(0,OH)4·7HzO photo 1 Labuntsovite group Alsakharovite-Zn was discovered in the Pegmatite #45, Lepkhe-Nel'm MI.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals of the Eudialyte Group from the Sagasen Larvikite Quarry, Porsgrunn, Norway
    = Minerals of the eudialyte group from the Sagasen larvikite quarry, Porsgrunn, Norway Alf Olav Larsen, Arne Asheim and Robert A. Gault Introduction Eudialyte, aNa-rich zirconosilicate with varying amounts of Ca, Fe, Mn, REE, Nb, K, Y, Ti, CI and F, was first described from the llimaussaq alkaline complex, South Greenland by Stromeyer (1819), Since then, the mineral has been described from many other alkaline deposits, and is a characteristic mineral in agpaitic nepheline syenites and their associated pegmatites. In recent years, eudialyte (sensa lata) has been the subject of extensive studies. The broad compositional variations and new insight into the crystal chemistry of the mineral group resulted in the definition of several new species by the Eudialyte Nomenclature Subcommittee under the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names of the International Mineralogical Association (Johnsen et al. 2003b). Brown eudialyte (s. I.) is a common constituent of the agpaitic pegmatites in the Langesundsfjord district in the western part of the Larvik plutonic complex (Br0gger 1890). Recent chemical analyses of the mineral have shown that some localities contain ferrokentbrooksite (Johnsen et al. 2003a). Other localities hold eudialyte (sensa stricto). Ferrokentbrooksite is the ferrous-iron-dominant analogue of kentbrooksite with Fe as the predominant element replacing Mn. Kentbrooksite is the Mn-REE-Nb-F end member in a solid solution series between eudialyte (s. s.) and ferrokentbrooksite, with an extension to oneillite (Johnsen et al. 1998, Johnsen et al. 1999, Johnsen et al. 2003a), as well as to carbokentbrooksite and zirsilite-(Ce) (Khomyakov et al. 2003). Carbokentbrooksite has a significant content of carbonate and Na > REE for the N4 site, while zirsilite-(Ce) has REE > Na (with Ce predominant) for the N4 site.
    [Show full text]
  • 12•12H2o, a New Mineral Species from Mont Saint-Hilaire, Quebec: Description, Structure Determination and Relationship to Benitoite and Wadeite
    747 The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 43, pp. 747-758 (2005) BOBTRAILLITE, (Na,Ca)13Sr11(Zr,Y,Nb)14Si42B6O132(OH)12•12H2O, A NEW MINERAL SPECIES FROM MONT SAINT-HILAIRE, QUEBEC: DESCRIPTION, STRUCTURE DETERMINATION AND RELATIONSHIP TO BENITOITE AND WADEITE ANDREW M. McDONALD§ Department of Earth Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada ¶ GEORGE Y. CHAO Ottawa–Carleton Geoscience Centre, Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada ABSTRACT Bobtraillite is a new, complex zirconosilicate found in igneous breccias and nepheline syenite pegmatites at the Poudrette quarry, Mont Saint-Hilaire, Quebec. It is associated with a burbankite-group mineral, donnayite-(Y), clinoamphibole, albite, aegirine, pyrrhotite, pyrite, annite, analcime, microcline, a white mica (muscovite?), yellow titanite, clinopyroxene and calcite. Crystals are commonly grey to brown in color, blocky to prismatic, elongate along [001], with a maximum length of 2 mm. It is generally found as isolated single crystals or simple parallel intergrowths with two or three members, rarely in small (<0.1 mm) rosettes. It is transparent with a vitreous luster and a white streak, and is non-luminescent. The Mohs hardness is 5½; no cleavage is evident. It is brittle and has an uneven to conchoidal fracture. The calculated density is 3.16 g/cm3. Bobtraillite is nonpleochroic, uniaxial positive, with ␻ 1.627(1) and ␧ 1.645(1). Seven analyses made on one crystal gave: Na2O 5.62, CaO 1.11, SrO 17.76, BaO 0.40, B2O3 (calc.) 3.38, Y2O3 1.15, SiO2 40.51, ZrO2 25.32, HfO2 0.48, Nb2O5 1.32 and H2O (calc.) 5.25, total 102.30 wt.%, corresponding to (Na11.20Ca1.22)⌺12.42(Sr10.59Ba0.16)⌺10.75 (Zr12.69Y0.63Nb0.61Hf0.14)⌺14.07 Si41.64B6O132(OH)12•12H2O on the basis of 156 anions, or ideally, (Na,Ca)13Sr11(Zr,Y,Nb)14Si42B6O132(OH)12•12H2O.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Occasion of His 80Th Anniversary)
    Crystallography Reports, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2001, pp. 521–522. Translated from Kristallografiya, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2001, pp. 583–584. Original Russian Text Copyright © 2001 by the Editorial Board. In Memory of Boris Konstantinovich Vainshtein (on the Occasion of His 80th Anniversary) On July 10, 2001, Boris Konstantinovich Vainsh- In 1945, Vainshtein entered the postgraduate course tein, an outstanding physicist–crystallographer and of the Institute of Crystallography and was bound for- member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, would ever with this institute. In 1950, he defended his Candi- have celebrated his eightieth birthday. date and, in 1955, Doctoral dissertations in physics and mathematics. In 1959, he organized and headed the Academician Vainshtein, an outstanding scientist Laboratory of Protein Structure. In 1962, Vainshtein and a remarkable person, has made a great contribution was elected a Corresponding Member and, in 1976, a to the creation and development of modern crystallog- Full Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences. raphy. He was a talented organizer of science and the Being appointed the director of the Institute of Crys- director of the Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography tallography in 1962, Vainshtein continued the scientific for more than 34 years. traditions laid by A.V. Shubnikov and developed crys- Boris Konstantinovich Vainshtein was born in Mos- tallography as a science combining studies along three cow in 1921. He graduated with distinction from two main integral parts—crystal growth, crystal structure, higher schools—the Physics Faculty of Moscow State and crystal properties. The great organizational talent University (1945) and the Metallurgy Faculty of the characteristic of Vainshtein flourished during his direc- Moscow Institute of Steel and Alloys (1947) and torship—he managed to gather around him people received a diploma as a physicist and an engineer- devoted to science and transformed the Institute of researcher.
    [Show full text]
  • GENESIS and TYPOCHEMISM of LAMPROPHYLLITEBARYTOLAMPROPHYLLITE SERIES MINERALS from LUJAVRITEMALIGNITE COMPLEX of KHIBINY MASSIF Yulia V
    New Data on Minerals. M., 2004. Vol. 39 65 UDC 549.657 GENESIS AND TYPOCHEMISM OF LAMPROPHYLLITEBARYTOLAMPROPHYLLITE SERIES MINERALS FROM LUJAVRITEMALIGNITE COMPLEX OF KHIBINY MASSIF Yulia V. Azarova Institute of Ore Deposits, Geology, Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry RAS, Moscow, [email protected] The detail analysis of chemical composition and character of postmagmatic alteration of lamprophyl- litebarytolamprophyllite series minerals from lujavritemalignites of Khibiny massif was made by local roentgenospectral and electronmicroscopic methods. It is determined that in lujavrites highbarium lampro- phyllite is a typomorphic accessory mineral. In malignites two stages of lamprophyllite alteration are ascer- tained, which correspond to two stages of their formation: 1) at the stage of primary rocks (lujavrite or titanite trachytoid melteigiteurtites) transformation in result of K,Simetasomatosis the recrystallization of primary Balamprophyllite without change of chemical composition (in case of lujavrites) and enrichment of primary strontium lamprophyllite by barium and potassium (in case of melteigiteurtites) take place; 2) at the stage of lowtemperature rocks transformation by action of solutions enriched by strontium and/or calcium the replacement of Balamprophyllite by strontium analogue (in malignites genetically connected to lujavrites) and development of titanite after Ba,Klamprophyllite (in malignites connected to ijoliteurtites) occur. It is detected that the character of postmagmatic alteration of primary strontium lamprophyllite in «porphyraceous malignites» is also the evident of primary rocks (trachytoid ijolites) transformation during K,Simetasomatosis. 4 figures, 1 table and 16 references. Lamprophyllite, (Sr,Ba,K)2 Na(Na,Fe,Mn)2 apatitnepheline deposit with overlapping Ti3 (Si4O16)(O,OH,F)2, is one of the most charac- ristschorrites up to the upper course of Ku - teristic accessory minerals of Khibiny alkaline niiok.
    [Show full text]
  • Khomyakovite and Manganokhomyakovite, Two
    893 TheCanadian Mineralogist Vol. 37,pp. 893-899 (1999) KHOMYAKOVITEAND MANGANOKHOMYAKOVITE, TWO NEW MEMBERS OF THEEUDIALYTE GROUP FROM MONT SAINT.HILAIRE, QUEBEC, CANADA OLE JOHNSEN Geological Museum, University of Copenhagen,Oster Voldgade 5-7, DK-L350 Copenhagen,Denmark ROBERT A. GAULT, JOEL D. GRICE AND T. SCOTT ERCIT Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P O. Box 3143, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario Kl P 6P4, Canaela Aesrnacr Khomyakovite, ideally Nal2Sr3Ca6Fe3Zr3W(Si25O73)(O,OH,H2O)3(OH,Cl)zand manganokhomyakovite, ideally Na12Sr3Ca6N4n3Zr3W(Si25O7r(O,OH,H2O)3(OH,Cl)2are two new members of the eudialyte group from Mont Saint-Hilaire, Quebec. They occur as orange to orange-red,pseudo-octahedral crystals ranging in size from 0.5 mm (khomyakovite) to 5 mm (manganokhomyakovite).Associated minerals include, for khomyakovite: analcime, annite, calcite, natrolite, pyrite, and titanite, and for manganokhomyakovite:aegirine, albite, analcime,annite, cerussite, galena, kupletskite, microcline, molybdenite, natrolite, pyrite, pyrrhotite, sodalite, sphalerite, titanite, wohlerite and zircon. Both minerals are transparentto translucent, with a vitreous luster and white streak They are brittle, with a hardnessof 5-6 (Mohs scale). They have no cleavage,no parting and an uneven fractue. They are uniaxial negative, for khomyakovire: a = 1.62'19(5) and e = I.6254(5), and for manganokhomyakovite: = o -= 1.629(1) and e 1.626(2).They are trigonal, spacegroup R3n. For kho-myakovitg.a 14.2959(8),c 30.084(3) A,V 5324.6('l) A3, and for manganokhomyakovi
    [Show full text]
  • GEUS No 190.Pmd
    G E O L O G Y O F G R E E N L A N D S U R V E Y B U L L E T I N 1 9 0 · 2 0 0 1 The Ilímaussaq alkaline complex, South Greenland: status of mineralogical research with new results Edited by Henning Sørensen Contributions to the mineralogy of Ilímaussaq, no. 100 Anniversary volume with list of minerals GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1 Geology of Greenland Survey Bulletin 190 Keywords Agpaite, alkaline, crystallography, Gardar province, geochemistry, hyper-agpaite, Ilímaussaq, mineralogy, nepheline syenite, peral- kaline, Mesoproterozoic, rare-element minerals, South Greenland. Cover Igneous layering in kakortokites in the southern part of the Ilímaussaq alkaline complex, South Greenland. The central part of the photograph shows the uppermost part of the layered kakortokite series and the overlying transitional kakortokites and aegirine lujavrite on Laksefjeld (680 m), the dark mountain in the left middle ground of the photograph. The cliff facing the lake in the right middle ground shows the kakortokite layers + 4 to + 9. The kakortokite in the cliff on the opposite side of the lake is rich in xenoliths of roof rocks of augite syenite and naujaite making the layering less distinct. On the skyline is the mountain ridge Killavaat (‘the comb’), the highest peak 1216 m, which is made up of Proterozoic granite which was baked and hardened at the contact to the intrusive complex. The lake (987 m) in the foreground is intensely blue and clear because it is practically devoid of life.
    [Show full text]