Apolitical Politics in the Italian Cabin Cs in the Italian Cabinet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Apolitical Politics in the Italian Cabin Cs in the Italian Cabinet Course: SKOM12 Term: Spring 2019 Supervisors: Marja Åkerström Examiner Ilkin Mehrabov Examiner: Howard Nothhaft Some (just) like it hot: Apolitical politics in the Italian Cabinet LUCA RIZZI Lund University Department of strategic communication Master’s thesis i ii Abstract Some (just) like it hot: Apolitical politics in the Italian Cabinet The current Italian Cabinet was composed in 2018 by two populist parties who had never been a relevant participant in the Government before. Social media play a significant role in the communication of both parties, who use Facebook and Twitter to directly reach the citizens. Members of the parties with relevant positions in the Cabinet are delivering an extremely uncommon and often apolitical online communication, in regards of both the register and the contents of their messages, and this is causing a break with the institutional communication of past cabinets. This thesis aims at finding trends in the social media communication of the current Cabinet, and discussing the implications for the development of political communication in general. Keyword: populist communication, politics, social media communication, social media strategies, Italy iii iv Acknowledgments The first two persons that I need to thank are Marja Åkerström and Ilkin Mehrabov. Their constant willingness to help, their enthusiasm and their frankness made my work extremely more engaging and satisfying. I could not have asked for more. I would also like to thank Howard Nothhaft and my fellow students, who at a delicate moment of this program convinced me to continue with my studies. In this respect, thanks to everyone at Sydskånska Nationen in Lund, which has been my escape valve during these two years and especially during these last five months. Last and most importantly, thanks to Emanuela, Giovanni, Marco and Enrico. All I do, I am and will be, I owe it to them and to their support. Lund, May 2019 Luca Rizzi (Savio) v vi Table of contents 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................p. 1 1.1. Politicians and social media.................................................................................................p. 1 1.2. Populist communication.......................................................................................................p. 2 2. Research Aim & Research Questions..........................................................................................p. 5 2.1. Research aim: effects of social media on political communication.....................................p. 5 2.2. Research Question................................................................................................................p. 6 3. Background..................................................................................................................................p. 7 3.1. M5S: A crisis-based movement...........................................................................................p. 7 3.2. Lega: from regionalism to nationalism................................................................................p. 8 3.3. Relevance of the Italian case................................................................................................p. 9 4. Theoretical Approach................................................................................................................p. 11 5. Literature Review......................................................................................................................p. 15 5.1. Mediatization......................................................................................................................p. 15 5.2. Political use of social media...............................................................................................p. 16 5.3. Populist Communication.....................................................................................................p. 17 5.4. Intimization.........................................................................................................................p. 18 5.5. Attention Economy.............................................................................................................p. 19 5.6. Two relevant results............................................................................................................p. 20 6. Methodology & Empirical Material...........................................................................................p. 23 6.1. Methodology.......................................................................................................................p. 23 6.2. Empirical Material..............................................................................................................p. 24 6.3. Data Collection Criteria......................................................................................................p. 26 6.4. Overall picture of the collected data...................................................................................p. 27 6.5. Translation disclaimer.........................................................................................................p. 28 vii 7. Analysis......................................................................................................................................p. 29 7.1. Categorizing the data: Strategies........................................................................................p. 29 7.2. Informality and Emotionalization: the Intimization strategy..............................................p. 31 7.2.1. Using Intimization to tackle accountability during crises........................................p. 32 7.3. You are what you do and you do what you are: the Personalization strategy....................p. 36 7.3.1. Demonizing opponents through Active Personalization.........................................p. 38 7.4. Honesty and common sense: the Anti-Intellectualism strategy.........................................p. 40 7.4.1. Anti-intellectualism in technical debates..................................................................p. 42 7.4.2. Making anti-intellectualism a daily practice.............................................................p. 45 7.5. Combining strategies: Anti-Intellectualist Personalization................................................p. 48 7.5.1. Personalizing technical critiques..............................................................................p. 48 7.5.2. Cherry-picking anti-intellectualism..........................................................................p. 52 7.6. Cutting out the middleman: from personal channels to news media..................................p. 55 7.6.1. The Conte Cabinet versus the Media........................................................................p. 57 7.7. Self-conflicting communication: changing stance over time.............................................p. 59 7.7.1. From active to passive personalization.....................................................................p. 59 7.7.2. Cherry-picking personalization................................................................................p. 62 7.7.3. Coherence of register versus coherence of content..................................................p. 64 8. Discussion..................................................................................................................................p. 67 8.1. Results: M5S versus Salvini...............................................................................................p. 67 8.2. Results: what does communication impoverishment mean................................................p. 67 8.3. Results: implications of the contribution of knowledge.....................................................p. 68 8.4. Future research recommendations......................................................................................p. 69 9. Conclusion..................................................................................................................................p. 71 10. References................................................................................................................................p. 73 11. Appendix..................................................................................................................................p. 85 viii 1. Introduction Italy is often taken as an example in talks on the rise of populism in Europe. The two parties that are usually mentioned in these talks are self-proclaimed "anti-party" Movimento Cinque Stelle (M5S, "Five Star Movement") and far-right Lega Nord ("Northern League", LN). The two, even diverging greatly on almost all policies and electoral base, joined in a coalition to form the government after the elections of 2018, where they respectively obtained roughly the 32% and the 18% of votes (The Guardian, 2018). The coalition was formed as the only practicable combination of political forces that would have obtained a parliamentary majority, after several months of hung- parliament situation. The current government is commonly defined as the Gialloverde Government (yellow-green, from the color of the two parties) or as the Conte Cabinet, from the name of the non- political Prime Minister appointed jointly by the two parties, Giuseppe Conte. Less than one year after the elections, polls are currently showing opposite trends regarding the approval rates for the two parties and their leaders, who are currently
Recommended publications
  • Government of Change’
    Policy Polarisation in Italy: The Short and Conflictual Life of the ‘Government of Change’ (2018-2019) ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN SOUTH EUROPEAN SOCIETY AND POLITICS Nicolò Conti, Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome, [email protected] Andrea Pedrazzani, Department of Social and Political Science, University of Milan, [email protected] (corresponding author) Federico Russo, Department of History, Society and Human Studies of the University of Salento, [email protected] Abstract This paper uses the concept of policy polarisation to understand the short and conflictual life of the Conte I cabinet which remained in office in Italy from June 2018 to September 2019. We show how policy polarisation in parliament and between coalition parties shaped the formation and termination of the so-called ‘government of change’. When investigating the implementation of the government agenda, we also assess the role of the coalition contract as an (ineffective) institutional solution to problems stemming from policy divisions between the Five Star Movement and the Lega. We argue that, despite some policy accomplishments of the government, the Five Star Movement-Lega coalition appears more as a temporary experiment, whose legacy may not represent a new course of action. Keywords: Government coalition, Government agenda, Populism, Coalition agreement, Party manifestos, Parliamentary questions, Five Star Movement, Lega 1 Policy polarisation is a crucial factor influencing the entire life cycle of governments in contemporary democracies. It is not only a key aspect of party competition during the electoral campaign (Downs 1957; Sartori 1976). As the comparative literature has pointed out, polarisation which sets the two sides of the party system at polar opposites can also increase the complexity of the bargaining environment after the elections, thus delaying the formation of governments and affecting the type of cabinets eventually formed.
    [Show full text]
  • Comitato Salviamo Genova E La Liguria ABSTRACT Stima Della
    Comitato Salviamo Genova e la Liguria ABSTRACT Stima della perdita di marginalità subita dalle imprese liguri a seguito dei lavori sulla rete autostradale regionale Disclaimer: In questo rapporto sono contenuti i dati che i rappresentanti delle categorie economiche hanno predisposto per la stima della perdita di fatturato e dei maggiori costi sostenuti a seguito della caduta dei livelli di servizio sulle autostrade liguri. Il Dipartimento di Economia dell’Università di Genova e la Camera di Commercio di Genova si sono occupati solo delle elaborazioni successive. Obiettivo del lavoro Il presente lavoro ha come obiettivo la stima dei danni subiti dalle imprese liguri a seguito dei lavori che hanno interessato la rete autostradale – in particolare nei mesi da giugno ad agosto 2020 – che si sono tradotti in una perdita di marginalità, quindi maggiori costi di produzione che non sono stati ribaltati sui prezzi di vendita, e perdita di fatturato conseguente al maggior tempo di produzione o alla riduzione della domanda (in particolare per le attività di servizi). Metodologia del lavoro Il lavoro si propone di giungere ad una stima del danno complessivo come sommatoria delle stime relative alle singole categorie economiche o settori di attività. Tale metodo di lavoro si rende necessario per tenere conto delle specificità dei singoli settori, oltre che della necessità di dover ricorrere a proxy differenti per le singole stime. Va inoltre sottolineato che i danni oggetto di stima sono intervenuti in un periodo del tutto particolare, caratterizzato dall’emergenza sanitaria legata al virus Covid-19, pertanto si è dovuto preliminarmente depurare i dati dagli effetti legati all’emergenza sanitaria; infine va tenuto presente che le stime si basano su dati che in alcuni casi sono ancora provvisori (es.
    [Show full text]
  • A Virtual Train Journey Along the Mare Ligure from Ventimiglia to Rome
    Italian Culture Newsletter Number 22 A Virtual Train Journey along the Mare Ligure from Ventimiglia to Rome. Marie and I have made this journey on a number of occasions. In doing so we have either made the journey in a single day albeit with a change of train, usually at Genova. On other occasions, we have spent an evening or even a few days at Genova and/or at Livorno or Pisa. The journey described will involve more stops on the way but could be more interesting on that account. The trip begins in Ventimiglia where we stayed overnight on our last day of our last holiday in Italy. This had been occasioned by the French railway strike which prevented any trains from running from Ventimiglia to Nice on the day of our arrival from Rome into the city at the Italian- French border in Liguria. Our first visit to Ventimiglia was in 2006 when some Italian friends from Cuneo, due north of Ventimiglia, in Piemonte, met us at the rail station in Ventimiglia to take us for a short stay at their apartment in Nice. On that occasion we didn’t see much of the city except for part of the old medieval town, which now mostly is the home of many of the southerners from Naples, Calabria and Sicily who moved north seeking employment after WWII. The old town is perched high above the new city with its long sea-front promenade and railway station. Ventimiglia is the ancient Albium Intemelium, the capital of the Intemelii, a Ligurian tribe which long resisted the Romans, until in 115 BC it was forced to submit to Marcus Aemilius Scaurus.
    [Show full text]
  • PONTE MORANDI, Genova Un Anno Fa Crollava Il Viadotto Sul Polcevera
    1 PONTE MORANDI, Genova un anno fa crollava il viadotto sul Polcevera di Alice Spagnolo – 14 Agosto 2019 – 6:30 Genova. L’orologio segna le 11.36. E’ il 14 agosto 2018 e sta piovendo. La città è viva come non lo sarà mai più. Un boato e poi la polvere che copre Genova, la Superba. Il viadotto sul Polcevera del Ponte Morandi si spezza e si sgretola, trascinando nel baratro 43 vite. Con il ponte si spacca in due una città, una regione, la Liguria, l’Italia intera. E’ passato un anno, ma le immagini del crollo del viadotto restano negli occhi dei genovesi, dei liguri e non solo. Il ponte ora non esiste più, completamente demolito alle 9,37 del 28 giugno scorso con una ‘bomba’ di 680 chili di esplosivo, tra dinamite e plastico. Un simbolo di Genova cancellato dalla vista, ma che resta impresso nella mente e nell’animo come una ferita che non si rimargina. Come quel furgoncino verde della Basko rimasto a un metro dal precipizio, e il cui conducente si è salvato per un miracolo, così i liguri sono rimasti, aggrappati alla vita guardando negli occhi la morte. A un anno dalla strage autostradale di Genova, restano le famiglie e gli amici di quelle 43 vite spezzate. Restano i 566 sfollati. Restano la rabbia e il dolore, ma anche la voglia di rinascere e ricominciare. C’è chi ha perso un figlio, un padre, un fratello. Chi ha perso la casa e chi ha perso il lavoro. C’è chi convive, ancora oggi, con i disagi, con le polveri sollevate dall’enorme cantiere che ha dapprima messo in sicurezza e poi demolito ciò che restava del ponte Morandi e ora si prepara a ricostruire un viadotto che unisca di nuovo la Riviera24 - 1 / 2 - 27.09.2021 2 Liguria, da Ponente a Levante.
    [Show full text]
  • 302 Marco Bassini* Abstract the Spread of Fake News on the Internet
    RISE OF POPULISM AND THE FIVE STAR MOVEMENT MODEL: AN ITALIAN CASE STUDY Marco Bassini* Abstract The spread of fake news on the Internet, the educational divide, the adverse effects of the economic crisis and the emergence of international terrorism are often ranked among the factors that led to the rise of populism. However, quite rarely it is called into question whether (and how) the distrust of mainstream political parties had an impact on the rise of populism across the Western democracies. Adopting a constitutional law perspective requires looking at the rise of populism through the lenses of the crisis of democratic representation. The paper aims at exploring the Italian scenario, where the anti-establishment Five Star Movement has grown up as leading populist force fostering a direct political participation of voters through the use of the Internet that is supposed to bring, in the long run, to political disintermediation. In this respect, the goal of the paper is to explore from a constitutional law perspective the grounds on which the rise of this anti-establishment movement has relied and the constraints that the Constitution may place on the populist surge. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.....................................................................................303 2. Political parties in the Italian Constitution..................................305 3. How the Five Star Movement entered the political arena........312 4. Some key factors behind the rise of populism in Italy..............316 5. Pars destruens – Some critical remarks on the Five Star Movement................................................................323 6. Pars construens – Making political parties democratic again?..329 *Postdoctoral Researcher in Constitutional Law, University of Milan “Bocconi” 302 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW, VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Italy's New Austerity Government Imposed by European Union Can't
    MOVISOL STATEMENT Italy’s New Austerity Government Imposed by European Union Can’t Last Liliana Gorini, Chairwoman of MoviSol, LaRouche’s George Soros are pushing this program in a futile at- movement in Italy, issued the following statement on tempt to save the collapsing financial system by creat- September 4, titled “A Government Imposed by the EU ing yet another speculative bubble—after the deriva- to Prevent Elections and Impose a Harsh Austerity tives one—of the so-called “climate bonds.” Budget on Italy.” Glass-Steagall, National Banking, The European Union (EU) has succeeded, under Ita- New Silk Road ly’s Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, in imposing a new The 26 points of the new “red-yellow” (PD-M5S) government on Italy, supported by the Democratic Party coalition are a reflection of this speculative bubble on (PD), the Five Star Party behalf of “climate.” It’s no co- (M5S) and the left party Liberi incidence that Point 9 of the e Uguali, in order to prevent 10 points which former M5S elections and ensure a “blood Deputy Prime Minister Luigi and tears” austerity regime, Di Maio had said were “indis- which Italian voters had pensable” after his meeting clearly voted against in the Eu- with President of the Repub- ropean elections in May. For lic Sergio Mattarella at the the fourth time in six years, the Quirinale Palace on August Democratic Party has entered 28, referring to banking sepa- the government without being ration (Glass-Steagall), has elected! Many wonder how mysteriously disappeared this crisis erupted, and how from the program agreed Lega Party head, and former upon with the PD only seven Vice Premier Matteo Salvini days later, to be replaced with made it possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Demolizione Ponte Morandi, Salvini: “Operazione Unica Al Mondo”. Toti: “Giornata Storica” Di Redazione 28 Giugno 2019 – 11:53
    1 Demolizione Ponte Morandi, Salvini: “Operazione unica al mondo”. Toti: “Giornata storica” di Redazione 28 Giugno 2019 – 11:53 Genova. “Sono totalmente fiducioso sulla ricostruzione del ponte di Genova”. Lo ha detto il vicepremier Matteo Salvini dopo la demolizione delle pile. “Oggi è la giornata in cui ringraziare ingegneri, tecnici operai e forze dell’ordine, oggi si è compiuta un’operazione unica al mondo”. “È una giornata bellissima per la nostra città, la nostra regione, per tutta l’Italia. Siamo di fronte a un intervento di alta ingegneria, un’eccellenza del nostro paese. La demolizione è il risultato di capacità tecniche straordinarie e di una straordinaria unione di intenti dal punto di vista politico e amministrativo. Tutti hanno remato nella stessa direzione, dal 14 agosto Governo, Regione, Comune e istituzioni periferiche dello Stato hanno lavorato con abnegazione e serietà, ma anche con generosità, per rispettare le promesse fatte ai cittadini”. Il presidente di Regione Liguria Giovanni Toti ha seguito la demolizione delle pile 10 e 11, con l’assessore alla Protezione civile Giacomo Giampedrone, il sindaco di Genova Marco Bucci, il ministro dell’Interno Matteo Salvini e quello allo Sviluppo economico Luigi di Maio. “Credo che quello di oggi – aggiunge Toti – sia un evento che riavvicina la politica al Paese perché si è dimostrato che, quando si vuole, le cose si possono fare. Tutti i tempi sono stati rispettati, anche anticipando di qualche giorno, quando possibile, ad esempio con la consegna delle case agli sfollati. Avevamo promesso viabilità alternativa, risarcimenti alle Il Vostro Giornale - 1 / 3 - 26.09.2021 2 imprese, investimenti per rendere competitivo il nostro porto: siamo riusciti, grazie alla collaborazione e all’impegno di tutti, a dare strade, compensare chi era stato danneggiato e portare investimenti infrastrutturali importanti che sono già in corso d’appalto”.
    [Show full text]
  • Governo Conte
    Il Governo Conte Documento di analisi e approfondimento dei componenti del nuovo esecutivo Composizione del Governo Conte • Prof. Avv. Giuseppe Conte, Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri • Dep. Luigi Di Maio. Vicepresidente del Consiglio dei Ministri e Ministro dello Sviluppo Economico, del Lavoro e delle Politiche Sociali • Sen. Matteo Salvini, Vicepresidente del Consiglio dei Ministri e Ministro dell’Interno • Dep. Riccardo Fraccaro, Ministro per i Rapporti con il Parlamento e la Democrazia Diretta • Sen. Avv. Giulia Bongiorno, Ministro per la Pubblica Amministrazione • Sen. Avv. Erika Stefani, Ministro per gli Affari Regionali e le Autonomie • Sen. Barbara Lezzi, Ministro per il Sud • Dep. Lorenzo Fontana, Ministro per la Famiglia e la Disabilità • Prof. Paolo Savona, Ministro per gli Affari Europei • Prof. Enzo Moavero Milanesi, Ministro degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale • Dep. Avv. Alfonso Bonafede, Ministro della Giustizia • Dott.ssa Elisabetta Trenta, Ministro della Difesa • Prof. Giovanni Tria, Ministro dell’Economia e delle Finanze • Sen. Gian Marco Centinaio, Ministro delle Politiche Agricole, Alimentari e Forestali • Gen. Sergio Costa, Ministro dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare • Sen. Danilo Toninelli, Ministro delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti • Dott. Marco Bussetti, Ministro dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca • Dott. Alberto Bonisoli, Ministro dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo • Dep. Giulia Grillo, Ministro della Salute • Dep. Giancarlo Giorgetti, Sottosegretario alla Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri con funzione di Segretario dei Consiglio dei Ministri 2 Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri Giuseppe Conte Nato a Volturara Appula (Foggia) nel 1964, avvocato civilista e professore universitario. Laurea in giurisprudenza conseguita presso l'università «La Sapienza» di Roma (1988).
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Equality 1948-2018. Seventy Years of Elections in Italy: How Are Women Faring in Terms of Power?
    In search of equality 1948-2018. Seventy years of elections in Italy: how are women faring in terms of power? July 2018 The first general election in Republican Italy was held on 18 April 1948. In the first Parliament there were only 49 women, accounting for 5%. Almost 30 years went by before Italy had more than 50 women in Parliament: it happened in 1976. It then took another 30 years to top the threshold of 150 women MPs, in 2006. In 2018, more than 300 women were elected for the first time: with 4,327 women running for election out of 9,529 candidates (almost half), 334 women were elect- ed. Currently, one MP in three is a woman and, for the first time in the Republic’s history, the second office of the State – the president of the Senate – is a woman. And what about the government? No woman has ever been appointed President of the Council of Ministers. Over 1,500 ministers have been appointed in 65 differ- ent cabinets, with women appointed ministers only 83 times (5 in the current gov- ernment) – 41 times as ministers without portfolio. The path to equality is still long, even on a local level: only two Region Presidents out of 20 are women and every 100 mayors, 87 are men. The starting point The Italian Constitution acknowledges, under article 3, the principle of gender equality, which was further strengthened in 2003 following an amendment to article 51: “the Re- public promotes, with specific provisions, equal opportunities for women and men”.
    [Show full text]
  • Technocratic Governments: Power, Expertise and Crisis Politics in European Democracies
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Technocratic Governments: Power, Expertise and Crisis Politics in European Democracies Giulia Pastorella A thesis submitted to the European Institute of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, February 2016 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 86852 words, excluding bibliography, appendix and annexes. Statement of joint work Chapter 3 is based on a paper co-authored with Christopher Wratil. I contributed 50% of this work. 2 Acknowledgements This doctoral thesis would have not been possible without the expert guidance of my two supervisors, Professor Sara Hobolt and Doctor Jonathan White. Each in their own way, they have been essential to the making of the thesis and my growth as an academic and as an individual. I would also like to thank the Economic and Social Research Council for their generous financial support of my doctoral studies through their scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2016 • ISSN 1801-3422
    POLITICS IN CENTRAL EUROPE The Journal of the Central European Political Science Association Volume 12 • Number 2 • September 2016 • ISSN 1801-3422 ESSAYS Volume 12 • Number 2 • September 2016 2 • September 12 • Number Volume Three technocratic cabinets in the Czech Republic: a symptom of party failure? Miloš Brunclík The rise of person -based politics in the new democracies: the Czech Republic and Slovenia Ladislav Cabada and Matevž Tomšič Much more than Economy: Assessing electoral POLITICS IN CENTRAL IN POLITICS EUROPE Accountability in the CEE Member States Andrea Fumarola Anti -Romani Terrorism in Europe Miroslav Mareš DISCUSSION Czech Protest Movements in the 2014 European Parliament Elections Petr Just POLITICS in Central Europe The Journal of the Central European Political Science Association Volume 12 Number 2 September 2016 ISSN 1801-3422 EDITORIAL ESSAYS Three technocratic cabinets in the Czech Republic: a symptom of party failure? Miloš Brunclík The rise of person ‑based politics in the new democracies: the Czech Republic and Slovenia Ladislav Cabada and Matevž Tomšič Much more than Economy: Assessing electoral Accountability in the CEE Member States Andrea Fumarola Anti ‑Romani Terrorism in Europe Miroslav Mareš DISCUSSION Czech Protest Movements in the 2014 European Parliament Elections Petr Just Politics in Central Europe – The Journal of Central European Political Science Association is the official Journal of the Central European Political Science Association (CEPSA). Politics in Central Europe is a biannual (June and December), double­‑blind, peer­‑reviewed publication. Publisher: Metropolitan University Prague Press Dubečská 900/10, 100 31 Praha 10-Strašnice (Czech Republic) Printed by: Togga, s. r. o., Volutová 2524/12, 158 00 Praha (Czech Republic) Copyright © by Metropolitan University Prague, v.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Democracy Under the Coronavirus Can a Global Pandemic Reconfigure Politics?
    Italian Democracy Under the Coronavirus Can a global pandemic reconfigure politics? By Alessandro Mulieri Since Italy has been a laboratory of recent global political developments, it is important to keep a close eye on how anti-elite and souverainist tendencies fare in the Coronavirus crisis that has hit Italy hard and how party lines have been reshuffled in the current reconciliation with technocracy. In a way much of what has been happening with this terrible crisis in Italy is about democracy, or as many scholars1 like to put it, about the crisis or crises of democracy, especially in this Southern European country. In recent years, Italy has been an interesting laboratory to track the developments of three important political patterns that have been prevalent in other Western countries as well. First a technocratic government was appointed in the midst of one of the worst financial crises that the country and the EU had experienced: the Monti Cabinet that was in charge from November 2011 to April 2013. Second, Italy has seen the rise of a movement, the Five Star Movement, which transcends traditional party classifications and is also described by many as populist because of its opposition to traditional 1 Wolfgang Merkel, "Is there a crisis of democracy?", Democratic Theory, vol. 1, no. 2,2014, pp. 11-25; Adam Przeworski, A. Crises of democracy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019. representative democracy. Third, a particularly strong right-wing populist party, Matteo Salvini’s League, which is probably among the most successful anti-EU and populist forces in Europe, has risen dramatically in the opinion polls.
    [Show full text]