Legislative Assembly Hansard 1960
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly TUESDAY, 20 SEPTEMBER 1960 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Address in Reply [20 SEPTEMBER] Questions 367 TUESDAY, 20 SEPTEMBER, 1960 Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. D. E. Nicholson, Murrumba) took the chair at 11 a.m. SCREENING OF FILMS Mr. SPEAKER: Hon. members, arrange ments have been made for two films to be screened in the Legislative Council Chamber at 7.30 o'clock this evening. One film deals with last year's Commonwealth Parliamentary Association General Con ference and the other with the Queensland Centenary celebrations. There will be other features on 35 millimetre slides and hon. members are invited to attend. QUESTIONS SPECIAL BRANCH, QUEENSLAND POLICE FORCE Mr. HANLON (Baroona) asked the Minister for Labour and Industry- "What was the numerical strength of the Special Branch of the Queensland Police Force as at June 30, 1957, 1958, 1959 and 1960?" Hon. K. J. MORRIS (Mt. Coot-tha) replied- "1957, 17; 1958, 17; 1959, 17; and 1960, 17." COMPENSATION ON ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR RoAD WIDENING Mr. AIKENS (Townsville South) asked the Minister for Public Works and Local Government- "In view of his reply to my question of September 14 on the subject of the acquisi tion of land for road-widening purposes by the Townsville City Council, will he in the interests of simple justice see to it that tbe Council informs the landholders con cerned of the protection afforded them under the law, instead of attempting to stampede them into action that would be unnecessary and costly?" Hon. L. H. S. ROBERTS (Whitsunday) replied- "Since the Honourable Member asked this question, I have asked the Townsville City Council to send me a copy of the notices which it has given to land-holders affected by re-alignments. These notice~; set out in full the provisions of Section 35 (10) of the Local Government Acts insofar as they relate to land-owners, includ ing the provision to which I referred in the answer to the Honourable Member's previous question on this subject. The rrw.tter does not ~eem trr c11l for any further action by me." 368 Questions [ASSEMBLY] Questions TRANSCRIPTS FOR CRIMINAL APPEALS "(9) What is the reason for these vacan cies in the laundry staff, if any?" Mr. BENNE'IT (South Brisbane) asked the "(1 0) Is it correct that no relief is pro Minister for Justice- vided for the office staff at the Princess "(1) Is he aware that a prisoner wanting Alexandra Hospital when on annual leave?" to appeal to the Court of Criminal Appe~l against a conviction and/ or sentence m "(11) Is he aware that twenty-five more the Criminal Court must pay for the tran wardsmen are required at the hospital?" script, which can amount to £35 and "(12) Is he aware that the one man on more?" duty in the canteen at the hospital between "(2) Is he aware that this charge is made the hours of 5 p.m. and 8.30 p.m. cannot even when the prisoner's counsel is pre cope with the demand for his services?" pared to appear without fee?" "(13) Will he give consideration to "(3) Is he aware that the transcript is made available free of charge to the Crown appointing an assistant in the canteen?" Prosecutor?" "(14) Is he aware that 300 extra nurses "(4) Does he consider that this charge have been employed since the opening of is fair and just, when it deprives a prisoner the Princess Alexandra Hospital, but that in poor circumstances from having his there has been no increase in the domestic own counsel appear in the Court of staff?" Criminal Appeal because of the absence of the transcript?" Hon. H. W. NOBLE (Yeronga) replied- "When the Princess Alexandra Hospital Hon. A. W. MUNRO (Toowong) replied- was opened it was realised that the utmost "(1 to 4) I refer the Honourable Member co-operation would be required between to Rule 36 (c) of Order IX. of the Criminal the managements of that Hospital and Practice Rules which provides that a tran the Brisbane General Hospital if wasteful script of the shorthand notes taken of the duplication and competition were to be proceedings at the trial of any appellant avoided. It was therefore decided firstly shall not be supplied free of charge except that the Brisbane and South Coast Hos by an order of the Court of Criminal pitals Board would control both Hospitals Appeal or a Judge thereof upon an appli for the initial period. For the next period, cation made by an appellant or by his and with the creation of the South Brisbane Counsel or Solicitor assigned to him under Hospitals Board, the plan has been that Chapter 67 of The Criminal Code. The there be a common Chairman and Board State Reporting Bureau does not specific Member on both the North Brisbane and ally charge the Crown for the copy of the South Brisbane Hospitals Board and that transcript supplied to it. However, this is the Manager of the Brisbane General Hos merely a matter of internal accounting see pital act as Joint Manager. The ease and ing that the Crown is responsible gener absence of disturbance with which the ally for the overall costs of carrying on development of the Princess Alexandra the Bureau." Hospital has been achieved is proof that this policy has been a wise one. I can MANAGER AND STAFF, PRINCESS ALEXANDRA understand that the Honourable Member HOSPITAL who is endeavouring to hold three jobs simultaneously might, from his own per Mr. BENNE'IT (South Brisbane) asked the sonal experience, feel that this is impossible Minister for Health and Home Affairs- to do successfully. I can assure him, how "(1) Is there a permanent manager of ever, that the case of the common Manager the Princess Alexandra Hospital?" for the North Brisbane and the Princess "(2) If not, why has the position been Alexandra Hospitals is not a parallel one maintained as an acting one for so long?" to his own. It is a fact that acting appoint "(3) Does the manager of the Brisbane ments have been made to vacant classified General Hospital at Herston Road also positions on the clerical staff at the Princess manage the Princess Alexandra Hospital?" Alexandra Hospital. This, however, is for "(4) If so, how many days a week does the special purpose of protecting the appeal the manager spend at the Princess rights of Officers of the North Brisbane and Alexandra Hospital?" South Brisbane Hospitals Boards, and has been done after consultation with the "(5) Is the manager able to divide effec Clerks' Union. It would appear that the tively his time between the two hospitals?" Honourable Member has been misinformed "(6) How many acting appointments are regarding the staff position at the Princess there at the Princess Alexandra Hospital Alexandra Hospital. For example, the and for how long have the appointees held laundry staff is up to establishment, and these positions?" there is no man employed in the canteen "(7) What is the number of employees at the times mentioned in his question. on the establishment of the laundry staff He is just as astray regarding the domestic at the Princess Alexandra Hospital?" staff. In the period in which he suggests "(8) What is the total number of vacan that no domestic staff has been appointed cies in the laundry staff at the present there have, in fact, been over 100 appoint lime?'' ments made." Barristers Act of [20 SEPTEMBER] 1956 Repeal Bill 369 PAPERS been opposed or resented by any member of the legal fraternity or any member of The following papers were laid on the the public. The right of a solicitor to table:- practise in both States is not queried, yet Proclamation under the State Transport the extension of that right to senior mem Acts, 1938 to 1943. bers of the profession seems to be a bone Regulations under the Inspection of Machi of contention. It might be contemplated nery Acts, 1951 to 1958. by the mover and seconder that the Act should provide that barristers who apply Regulations under the Inspection of Scaf for admission in Queensland should apply folding Acts, 1915 to 1959. to the Full Court of Queensland. It might Order in Council under the State Trans be argued that by those means reciprocity port Acts, 1938 to 1943. is maintained. However, let me assure the Order in Council under the University of hon. member for Carnarvon that, as the Queensland Acts, 1909 to 1957. rules stand at present, there could be no possibility of the admission of a barrister Barbers' Shops Regulations under the from New South Wales to practise in Health Acts, 1937 to 1959. Queensland, even with such an amendment Order in Council under the Magistrates of the Act. There have been cases in Courts Acts, 1921 to 1954. the past, and perhaps the Minister for Ordinance under the City of Brisbane Acts, Justice has been informed of them. One 1924 to 1959. such case is in re Evatt, and another in re O'Sullivan, a 1940 case. POLICE ACTS AMENDMENT BILL The CHAffiMAN: Order! The hon. mem ber has been seeking the reasons for the INITIATION amendment. With that I agree, but when Hon. K. J. MORRIS (Mt. Coot-tha he elaborates on why his reasons should be Minister for Labour and Industry): I move- considered, I think he is going beyond the "That the House will, at its next amendment. sitting, resolve itself into a Committee of Mr. BENNETT: I am merely justifying it.