Annual Report 0

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 0 Annual Report 2010 www.greenpeace.org International COVER IMAGE: Greenpeace activist swims in front of the Stena Carron, a giant oil drilling ship, to stop it moving to a Contents deepwater drilling site 100 miles north of the Shetland Isles. © WILL ROSE / GREENPEACE Greenpeace is present in 3 Message from the 4 40 countries across Europe, Executive DIrector the Americas, Africa, Asia and the Pacific. 4 Catalysing an Energy [R]evolution Greenpeace International, registered in the Netherlands 8 Protecting our Forests as Stichting Greenpeace Bold non-violent direct action took the struggle against climate change to one of its frontiers in 2010 – the Arctic Council, is the body that 10 Defending our Oceans Ocean. Activists evaded Danish navy commandos and scaled Cairn Energy’s exploration rig off Greenland, coordinates global Greenpeace halting the operation for nearly two days. policy and strategy. 12 Creating a Toxic-Free Future To maintain its independence, Greenpeace does not accept 14 Campaigning for 8 donations from governments Sustainable Agriculture or corporations but relies on contributions from individual 16 Our Ships supporters and foundation grants. 18 Our Supporters Greenpeace has been 20 How we spend our Following a short but highly effective Greenpeace campaigning against campaign targeting the Kit Kat brand, the food giant donated funds Nestlé agreed to stop purchasing products that come environmental degradation from rainforest destruction in May 2010. since 1971, when a small boat 22 Message from the of volunteers and journalists Board Chair, sailed into Amchitka, an area 10 north of Alaska where the US Our Board of Directors government was conducting 24 Financial Report - underground nuclear tests. This tradition of ‘bearing International witness’ in a non-violent 26 Financial Report - manner continues today. Worldwide Corruption inside the Japanese government, its adherence to international law, freedom of speech, the right of individual protest and the senseless killing of thousands of whales all came under the spotlight during the trial of the 28 Environmental Report ‘Tokyo Two’, the two activists who exposed widespread corruption in Japan’s whaling programme. Published by Greenpeace International Ottho Heldringstraat 5, 30 Office contact details 1066 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands 16 t +31 20 718 2000 f +31 20 718 2002 www.greenpeace.org JN 379 For more information please contact [email protected] In 2010, Greenpeace started the construction of a new Rainbow Warrior. The new ship will be the world’s first purpose-built, environmentally-advanced campaigning vessel, and the first purpose-built ship in the Greenpeace fleet. 2 Greenpeace International | 2010 Annual Report Message from the © MARCO OKHUIZEN / G Executive Director REENPEACE 2010 was marked by the devastation A strong, clear message was sent to the that the relentless and reckless pursuit palm oil and paper industry that rainforest of profit can cause: a human tragedy destruction is an unacceptable practice in and enormous environmental, social today’s global marketplace. and economic devastation that will last As thousands of tiny boats and massive a generation or more. We watched in clean-up vessels struggled to control the horror as oil poured from a blown-out spread of toxic, suffocating oil slicks in the deepwater well in the Gulf of Mexico. waters of the Gulf of Mexico, oil giants eyed The oil industry appeared to be both up the Arctic for deepwater drilling. They unprepared and powerless to stop it. hope to take advantage of climate change, The Deepwater Horizon disaster provided which is making this region more accessible. yet another reason why the world should The self-styled cowboy oil company end its reliance on dwindling fossil fuels Cairn Energy is blazing a trail and drilling and embrace an Energy [R]evolution exploratory deepwater oil wells in Arctic based upon smart use of energy and water off western and southwestern renewable energy sources. Greenland. Our ice-class ship Esperanza Following the crushing disappointment and a dedicated crew tried to prevent the of the Copenhagen Climate Summit, dangerous drilling, pointing out that a BP- where over 120 world leaders failed to style deepwater blow-out in the remote and seize the historic opportunity to agree fragile Arctic environment would be all but on a fair, ambitious and legally binding impossible to stop and clean up. climate protection treaty, we challenged As I write, we are approaching corporations to become leaders in the Greenpeace’s 40th birthday and this leads struggle to avert catastrophic climate us to review our past activities, campaigns change. We challenged them to clean and victories. It leads us to ask if we are up their supply chains and address their still relevant. Do we still have a job to do? roles in environmental destruction. We Over 40 years we have been honing our demanded that they champion policies to campaigning skills, by constantly innovating protect the environment and the climate. and adopting new tactics and strategies Throughout the year, we harnessed the we have stayed at the cutting edge. We power of consumers, urging them to vote are ready for the greatest struggle of all: the with their pockets and demand goods struggle to avert climate chaos. and services that do not cost the earth. Construction began on a new Rainbow We have been increasingly campaigning Warrior, a purpose-built campaign ship with our supporters to let major brands that will meet the most stringent and know that we won’t buy environmental exacting environmental standards, a sailing destruction. ship capable of travelling the world with a Big businesses have already been minimal carbon ‘footprint’. To be launched compelled to take action to end their role in November 2011, she will provide focus in supporting environmental destruction. and leadership for the ongoing struggle For example, when we exposed Nestlé’s to protect our planet. She will become role in Indonesian rainforest destruction a beacon of hope for men and women due to its reliance on unsustainably of good conscience world wide who are produced palm oil, the resulting social prepared to stand up and take action to media firestorm saw hundreds of protect the environment. thousands of people join us in demanding that the company put policies in place to ensure that it no longer contributed to the forces driving deforestation and the extinction of the orang-utans and Sumatran tigers that depend upon Indonesia’s rainforest. Greenpeace International | 2010 Annual Report 3 Catalysing an Energy [R]evolution REENPEACE © WILL ROSE / G 4 Greenpeace International | 2010 Annual Report main image: Greenpeace’s ‘Go Beyond Oil’ ship tour photo inset 1: Cairn Energy’s Stena Don oil rig is exposed and confronted the oil industry’s race to develop deep scaled by Greenpeace campaigners to prevent it sea drilling for oil. Companies are taking massive risks to drill from drilling off the coast of Greenland. in ever more dangerous places rather than investing in clean energy to stop climate change. photo inset 2: An oil firefighter attempts to fix an underwater pump during oil spill clean-up operations climate & in Dalian, China. Zhang Liang later drowned, despite desperate efforts to rescue him. energy © LU GUANG / GREENPEACE © WILL ROSE / GREENPEACE Bold non-violent direct action took the Scientists were also at the heart of our struggle against climate change to one ‘Arctic Under Pressure Tour’. Aboard the In July, a Greenpeace team of its frontiers in 2010 – the Arctic Ocean. Greenpeace ship Esperanza, the German provided international media with Companies such as the UK’s Cairn Energy marine science institute IFM-GEOMAR arresting first-hand images of an oil see the Arctic’s receding ice sheets as an carried out the largest ever experiment on spill in Dalian, China. Amid official opportunity to make profits from risky oil ocean acidification. Caused by the ocean’s underestimations of the spill’s size, drilling operations. Greenpeace couldn’t absorption of CO2 pollution from industrial predictions of a rapid cleanup, and disagree more. In August, our activists emissions, this process is changing the promises of minimal environmental evaded Danish navy commandos and scaled oceans’ chemistry, and could cause a damage, our images showed the real Cairn’s exploration rig off Greenland, halting breakdown of ocean ecosystems as we extent of the disaster and the severe the operation – we knew that, due to very know them. Our two-month expedition threat it posed to the area’s coastal ecosystem. tight deadlines, even a minor delay could yielded the most comprehensive data set have a major effect; Cairn didn’t find oil in ever on the impacts of ocean acidification in As oil kept gushing into the Gulf of 2010. Extremely difficult conditions have Arctic waters, as well as breathtaking images Mexico following the explosion of deterred oil companies from attempting of previously unseen areas of the sea floor the Deepwater Horizon platform, exploration in the Arctic in the past, but there north of Svalbard. Greenpeace put the operator, BP, is a danger that Cairn’s project could spark on the spot back home in the UK. Activists temporarily closed petrol an Arctic oil rush, with potentially devastating stations across London, while implications for marine life, and for coastal supporters redesigned the BP logo to ecosystems and communities. better reflect the company’s polluting The disastrous consequences of an oil spill “We don’t fully understand the reality. We called on BP to turn away had already become apparent when, earlier from high-cost and environmentally long-term effects of oil spills reckless sources of oil, like deepwater in the year, the BP-operated Deepwater drilling and the Canadian tar sands, Horizon drilling platform exploded and sank like the BP Deepwater Disaster towards an energy revolution based into the Gulf of Mexico.
Recommended publications
  • Frank Zelko Research Fellow, GHI
    “MAKE IT A GREEN PEACE”: THE HISTORY OF AN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION Frank Zelko Research Fellow, GHI In the early 1970s, the United States Congress’s House Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation held a series of hearings on the sub- ject of marine mammal protection. Among those who testified were rep- resentatives of America’s oldest and most established wilderness protec- tion groups, such as the Sierra Club, the Audubon Society, and the National Wildlife Federation. Although it was important to ensure that the world’s populations of whales and seals remained as healthy as pos- sible, these organizations argued, they did not support a policy of abso- lute protection. As long as the survival of the species was ensured, they believed, it was legitimate to use its “surplus” members for the benefit of people. In his testimony before the subcommittee, Thomas Kimball of the National Wildlife Federation employed phrases such as “renewable re- sources,” “stewardship,” and “professional wildlife management.” The “harvesting of surplus wildlife populations,” his organization felt, wasan “important management tool if the continuing long-range well-being of an animal population is the ultimate objective.”1 A few years later, a group of environmental protesters off the coast of California came across a fleet of Soviet whaling boats. Using motorized inflatable dinghies, the activists positioned themselves between a whal- er’s harpoon and a fleeing pod of sperm whales, acting as human shields to protect the defenseless giants. Whaling, these activists insisted, was not merely an issue of wildlife preservation or resource stewardship. Rather, it was an unconscionable act of violence perpetrated against a species whose intelligence and sensitivity put them in the same biological cat- egory as human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainbow Warrior Case
    1 Rainbow Warrior Case Rainbow Warrior (NEW ZEALAND v. FRANCE) France-New Zealand Arbitration Tribunal. 30 April 1990 (Jiménez de Aréchaga, Chairman; Sir Kenneth Keith and Professor Bredin, Members) SUMMARY: The facts: - In July 1985 a team of French agents sabotaged and sank the Rainbow Warrior, a vessel belonging to Greenpeace International, while it lay in harbour in New Zealand. One member of the crew was killed. Two of the agents, Major Mafart and Captain Prieur, were subsequently arrested in New Zealand and, having pleaded guilty to charges of manslaughter and criminal damage, were sentenced by a New Zealand court to ten years' imprisonment.1 A dispute arose between France, which demanded the release of the two agents, and New Zealand, which claimed compensation for the incident. New Zealand also complained that France was threatening to disrupt New Zealand trade with the European Communities unless the two agents were released. The two countries requested the Secretary-General of the United Nations to mediate and to propose a solution in the form of a ruling, which both Parties agreed in advance to accept. The Secretary-General's ruling, which was given in 1986, required France to pay US $7 million to New Zealand and to undertake not to take certain defined measures injurious to New Zealand trade with the European Communities.2 The ruling also provided that Major Mafart and Captain Prieur were to be released into French custody but were to spend the next three years on an isolated French military base in the Pacific. The two States concluded an agreement in the form of an exchange of letters on 9 July 1986 ("the First Agreement"),3 which provided for the implementation of the ruling.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Organizations Treaties
    74 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Headquarters: Parkring 8, POB 995, A-1011 Vienna, Austria. flagship, Rainbow Warrior, while it was in Auckland Harbour, Website: http://www.ofid.org New Zealand. Email: [email protected] Mission. Greenpeace is an independent global environmental Director-General: Suleiman Jasir al-Herbish (Saudi Arabia). organization that aims to secure a planet ‘that is ecologically healthy and able to nurture life in all its diversity’. It campaigns to: prevent pollution and abuse of the Earth’sland,oceans,air and fresh water; end all nuclear threats; and promote peace, global Environmental Organizations disarmament and non-violence. Organization. Greenpeace International has its headquarters in Friends of the Earth International Amsterdam in the Netherlands, from where it co-ordinates worldwide campaigns and monitors and advises 28 national and Origin. Friends of the Earth was founded in 1971 by a network of regional offices. These provide a presence in over 40 countries. environmental activists from France, Sweden, the UK and the USA. Financial contributions from governments, political parties and Mission. The organization aims to ‘collectively ensure environ- commercial organizations are not accepted. Funding is provided mental and social justice, human dignity, and respect for human by individual supporters and foundation grants. In the 18 months rights and peoples’ rights so as to ensure sustainable societies’. to Jan. 2009, 2·9m. people took out or renewed financial membership. Organization. Friends of the Earth International comprises 74 Headquarters: Ottho Heldringstraat 5, 1066 AZ Amsterdam, national member groups, with a combined membership of Netherlands. individuals exceeding 2m. around the world in some 5,000 local Website: http://www.greenpeace.org activist groups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategy of Radical Environmentalism
    Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, Summer 2008, Vol. 10, Issue 4. THROWING A WRENCH INTO THINGS: THE STRATEGY OF RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM Teale Phelps Bondaroff, University of Calgary Introduction: The current focus on Islamic terrorism has resulted in a lack of awareness of other forms of terrorism. Similarly, the focus on external non-conventional threats to security has meant that domestic threats are being overlooked. One such instance is that of the threat posed by radical environmentalist organizations, such as Earth First! (EF!)1, the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), and the Sea Shepherds Society. These organizations, which premise themselves upon the assertion of “No compromise in the Defense of Mother Earth!” have declared themselves Mother Nature’s armies and navies and represent the militarization of the environmental movement.2 The operations in which they engage, of which there have been more than 600 in the United States and Canada since 1996, have been responsible for an estimated $100 million in damages.3 Though the impact of these operations pale in comparison to those of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon in 2001, they represent a growing trend in environmental organizations, and a growing non-conventional societal threat. The threat is especially real in Canada where many groups find their origins in Canadian-born organizations such as Greenpeace. 1 The name of the ‘Earth First!’ includes the exclamation mark, which places emphasis on their commitment to action. 2 Jonathan I. Lange, “Refusal to Compromise: The Case of Earth First!” Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54 (Fall 1990), p.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Central Characters in Seven Operas from Australia 1988-1998 Anne Power University of Wollongong
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 1999 Voiced identity: a study of central characters in seven operas from Australia 1988-1998 Anne Power University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Power, Anne, Voiced identity: a study of central characters in seven operas from Australia 1988-1998, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Faculty of Creative Arts, University of Wollongong, 1999. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/1761 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] VOICED IDENTITY: A STUDY OF CENTRAL CHARACTERS IN SEVEN OPERAS FROM AUSTRALIA 1988-1998 ANNE POWER A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 1999 Faculty of Creative Arts University of Wollongong II ABSTRACT Composers of Australian operas, in the decade from 1988 to 1998, have responded to social and political events through the medium of central characters. In each of the seven operas in the study, a character becomes the signifier of reflections on events and conditions that affect Australian society. The works selected are Andrew Schultz's Black River, Gillian Whitehead's The Bride of Fortune, Moya Henderson's Lindy - The Trial Scene, Richard Mills' Summer of the Seventeenth Doll, Alan John's The Eighth Wonder, Martin Wesley-Smith's Quito and Colin Bright's The Sinking of the Rainbow Warrior. These operas are studied in three groups to investigate issues that concern voices of women in the contemporary operatic genre, issues of cultural identity and issues of political protest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sinking of the Rainbow Warrior: Responses to an International Act of Terrorism
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NECTAR Journal of Postcolonial Cultures and Societies ISSN No. 1948-1845 (Print); 1948-1853 (Electronic) The sinking of the rainbow warrior: Responses to an international act of terrorism Janet Wilson Introduction: the Rainbow Warrior Affair The Rainbow Warrior affair, an act of sabotage against the flagship of the Greenpeace fleet, the Rainbow Warrior, when berthed at Marsden wharf in Auckland harbour on 10th July 1985, dramatised in unprecedented ways issues of neo-imperialism, national security, eco-politics and postcolonialism in New Zealand. The bombing of the yacht by French secret service agents effectively prevented its participation in a Nuclear Free Pacific campaign in which it was to have headed the Pacific Fleet Flotilla to Moruroa atoll protesting French nuclear testing. Outrage was compounded by tragedy: the vessel’s Portuguese photographer, Fernando Pereira, went back on board to get his camera after the first detonation and was drowned in his cabin following the second one. The evidence of French Secret Service (Direction Generale de la Securite Exterieure or DGSE) involvement which sensationally emerged in the following months, not only enhanced New Zealand’s status as a small nation and wrongful victim of French neo-colonial ambitions, it dramatically magnified Greenpeace’s role as coordinator of New Zealand and Pacific resistance to French bomb-testing. The stand-off in New Zealand –French political relations for almost a decade until French bomb testing in the Pacific ceased in 1995 notwithstanding, this act of terrorism when reviewed after almost 25 years in the context of New Zealand’s strategic and political negotiations of the 1980s, offers a focus for considering the changing composition of national and regional postcolonial alliances during Cold War politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Plakat: Greenpeace-Aktionen Und Erfolge 1971-2013
    www.greenpeace.de Greenpeace-Aktionen und Erfolge 1971 bis 2013 1971 1983 1993 2007 Erste Aktion einer kleinen Gruppe von Umweltschützern Noch ein weiterer Erfolg: Die London Dumping Convention 200 Greenpeacer besetzen das ehemalige Salzbergwerk bei Mit der Studie „Plan B“ stellt Greenpeace ein fundiertes und Atomwaffengegnern, die sich „Greenpeace“ nennen: beschließt, für zehn Jahre keinen Atommüll mehr im Meer zu Morsleben, wo Atommüll eingelagert wird. ■ Die London Energie- und Klimaschutzkonzept für Deutschland bis 2020 Mit einem gecharterten Kutter „Phyllis Cormack“ fahren die versenken. ■ Start der Arbeit gegen Treibnetzfischerei und Dumping Convention verbietet die Entsorgung von radio- vor. Im Jahr darauf wird das Konzept bis 2050 erweitert. Männer aus Vancouver (Kanada) zur Westküste Alaskas, um der Antarktis-Kampagne: Greenpeace fordert einen aktivem Müll auf See. ■ Greenpeace zeigt mit einem Bericht, dass die hohe Nach- dort amerikanische Atombombenversuche zu verhindern. „Weltpark Antarktis“, um den Kontinent vor einem Ressour- frage nach Palmöl vieler Industrien wie z. B. der Kosmetik- Ihnen gelingt immerhin ein Aufschub des Tests, und cen-Abbau zu schützen. 1994 und Waschmittelbranche die Urwälder Indonesiens zerstört. „Greenpeace“ gewinnt viele Anhänger. Erfolge nach langer Kampagnenarbeit: Die Baseler Konven- Der artenreiche Wald wird für Palmöl-Monokulturen zerstört. 1984 tion verbietet Giftmüllexporte aus Industriestaaten nach ■ An deutschen Autobahnen stellen Greenpeacer Verkehrs- 1972 Das Greenpeace-Schiff „Sirius“ sperrt mit über Osteuropa und die Dritte Welt. ■ Die IWC richtet ein Schutz- schilder auf: „120 - Klimaschutz“. Ein Tempolimit auf deut- Mit der Yacht „Vega“ eines Bauunternehmers und 50 Fischkuttern die Pier der Gifttanker von Kronos-Titan. gebiet für Wale im Südpolarmeer ein, das seitdem wenig- schen Autobahnen ist längst überfällig.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009–2010 Greenpeace.Org GREENPEACE, INC
    annual report 2009–2010 greenpeace.org GREENPEACE, INC. 2009–2010 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Donald K. Ross, Chair Mission Statement Elizabeth Gilchrist, Treasurer Greenpeace is the leading independent Sharyle Patton campaigning organization that uses peaceful Valerie Denney protest and creative communication to expose Dan Rudie global environmental problems and to promote David Hunter solutions that are essential to a green and Jigar Shah David Pellow peaceful future. Bryony Schwan With over 40 offices located throughout the world, Additional Officers Greenpeace works to protect our oceans and ancient forests, and to end toxic pollution, global warming, Philip D. Radford, Executive Director nuclear threats, and genetic engineering. Tom Wetterer, Secretary Since 1971, Greenpeace has been the leading voice of GREENPEACE FUND, INC. 2009–2010 the environmental movement by taking a stand against BOARD OF DIRECTORS powerful political and corporate interests whose policies put the planet at risk. David Chatfield, Chair Peggy Burks, Treasurer Charity Rankings Elizabeth Gilchrist Greenpeace Fund is consistently ranked among the Ellen McPeake nation’s top charities—for our achievements and for the Karen Topakian high percentage of revenue that goes directly towards John Willis the protection of the planet. Jeffrey Hollender Greenpeace Fund is proud to meet all of the BBB Wise Additional Officers Giving Alliance Standards for Charity Accountability. Philip D. Radford, Executive Director Daniel McGregor, Secretary Greenpeace Fund is recognized by Charity Navigator as having demonstrated excellent financial efficiency. Greenpeace Fund is proud to be a top-rated environmental charity by the American Institute of Philanthropy with an “A-.” Greenpeace Fund is proud to be part of the CFC and to carry the “Best in America” seal from Independent Charities of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenpeace International Financial Statements 2014
    GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL AND RELATED ENTITIES COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Year ended 31 December 2014 Contents Page: 2. Board report Combined Financial Statements 5. Combined Statement of Financial Position 6. Combined Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year 7. Combined Statement of Changes of Equity for the year 8. Combined Statement of Cash Flows for the year 9. Notes to the Combined Financial Statements Stichting Greenpeace Council Financial Statements 32. Stichting Greenpeace Council Statement of Financial Position 33. Stichting Greenpeace Council Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year 34. Stichting Greenpeace Council Statement of Changes of Equity for the year 35. Stichting Greenpeace Council Notes to the Financial Statements Other information 45. Appropriation of result 46. Independent auditors’ report 1 GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL & RELATED ENTITIES Board report 2014 Board Report The Board of Stichting Greenpeace Council and related entities hereby presents its financial statements for the year ended on 31 December 2014. General Information These financial statements refer to Greenpeace International (GPI) and related entities only. Greenpeace International is an independent, campaigning organisation which uses non-violent, creative confrontation to expose global environmental problems, and to promote the solutions which are essential to a green and peaceful future. Greenpeace's goal is to ensure the ability of the earth to nurture life in all its diversity. Greenpeace International monitors the organisational development of 26 independent Greenpeace organisations, oversees the development and maintenance of our the Greenpeace ships, enables global campaigns, and monitors compliance with core policies. The 26 independent Greenpeace National & Regional organisations are based across the globe. The National & Regional Organisations (NROs) are independent organisations who share common values and campaign together to expose and resolve global environmental problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Satisfaction As a Form of Reparation for Moral Damages Suffered by Investors and Respondent States in Investor-State Arbitration Disputes
    Journal of International Dispute Settlement, (2012), pp. 1–38 doi:10.1093/jnlids/idr016 Satisfaction as a Form of Reparation for Moral Damages Suffered by Investors and Respondent States in Investor-State Arbitration Disputes PATRICK DUMBERRY* Downloaded from The question examined in this article is how moral damages should be remediated by arbitral tribunals in the specific context of investor-State arbitration. In other words, is the best remedy satisfaction or monetary compensation? The article first examines the issue of reparation for moral damages under general international law, and specifically the different forms that the remedy of satisfaction may take. Under http://jids.oxfordjournals.org/ international law, monetary compensation is the appropriate remedy for moral damages affecting an individual while satisfaction is the proper means of reparation for such damages caused to a State directly. The article then examines recent investor-State arbitration cases. They also show that monetary compensation is the appropriate remedy for moral damages affecting an individual or a corporation. Two recent cases (Pey Casado v Chile and Lemire v Ukraine) raise the question whether or not a tribunal established under a BIT could remediate moral damages suffered by a foreign investor with satisfaction (in the form of a declaration of wrongfulness) instead of monetary compensation. This issue has never been by guest on January 14, 2012 addressed in the doctrine. In our view, satisfaction is not the proper method of remediation in this context. In two other recent cases (Europe Cement v Turkey and Cementownia v Turkey), Turkey sought an award of monetary compensation for moral damages it allegedly suffered with regards to its ‘reputation and international standing’ as a result of baseless claims filed by the foreign investors.
    [Show full text]
  • Radioactivity Under the Sand – Analysis with Regard to the Treaty
    E-PAPER The Waste From French Nuclear Tests in Algeria Radioactivity Under the Sand Analysis with regard to the Treaty on the Prohibi- tion of Nuclear Weapons JEAN-MARIE COLLIN AND PATRICE BOUVERET Published by Heinrich Böll Foundation, July 2020 Radioactivity Under the Sand Contents Foreword 3 Summary 5 Introduction 7 1. French nuclear test sites 10 The Hamoudia zone for atmospheric nuclear tests: 13 February 1960 – 25 April 1961 15 The In Ekker zone for underground nuclear tests: 7 November 1961 – 16 February 1966 20 2. Waste under the sand 25 Non-radioactive waste 25 Contaminated material deliberately buried in the sand 29 Nuclear waste from tests and other experiments 36 3. Environmental and health issues in relation to the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons 40 Positive obligations: Articles 6 and 7 43 Application of Articles 6 and 7 in Algeria 44 Cases of assistance for victims and of environmental remediation among States 46 Recommendations 49 References 52 Foreword When we think of nuclear testing, in our mind’s eye we see pictures of big mushroom clouds hovering over the Pacific Ocean, the steppe in Kazakhstan, the desert in New Mexico or in Algeria. Most of these pictures were taken more than half a century ago, when above- ground atmospheric testing was still common practice among nuclear powers. Things have improved significantly since then: explosive nuclear tests went underground from the mid-1960s onwards, and from 1998 onwards, only North Korea resorted to nuclear testing. All major nuclear powers – the US, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, China, India and Pakistan - declared some sort of testing moratorium before the end of the 20th century, and some of them signed or even ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) afterwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual Report 09 International Contents 3 Message from the Executive Director 4 Counting Down to Copenhagen Greenpeace is present in 40 countries across Europe, 6 Copenhagen Crime Scene the Americas, Africa, Asia and the Pacific. Greenpeace 8 Catalysing an Energy [R]evolution International, registered in the 10 Protecting our Forests Netherlands as Stichting Greenpeace Council, is the 12 Defending our Oceans body that coordinates global Greenpeace policy and 14 Campaigning for Greener Agriculture: Ecological Farming strategy. 16 Creating a Toxic-Free Future To maintain its independence, Greenpeace does not accept 18 Green Science donations from governments or corporations but relies on 20 Our Ships contributions from individual supporters and foundation 22 Our Supporters grants. 24 How We Spend our Donated Funds Greenpeace has been campaigning against 26 Message from the Board Chair environmental degradation since 1971 when a small boat 26 Our Board of Directors of volunteers and journalists 28 Organisation Report sailed into Amchitka, an area north of Alaska where the US 29 Financial Report government was conducting underground nuclear tests. 32 Environmental Report This tradition of 'bearing witness' in a non-violent 34 Office Contact Details manner continues today. Published by Greenpeace International Ottho Heldringstraat 5, 1066 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands t +31 20 718 2000 f +31 20 718 2002 www.greenpeace.org JN 309 : Printed on 100% post-consumer recycled COVER IMAGE: Greenpeace volunteer chlorine-free paper with vegetable based inks protesting at the Houses of Parliament in London to call for a new style of politics in the UK, one capable of rising to meet the challenge For more information please contact of climate change.
    [Show full text]