DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2011 Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2011 Contents ANNUAL REPORT 2011 CONTENTS 01 Message from the Executive Director 3 02 Our Board of Directors 4 03 A New Warrior 6 04 Global Programme 8 05 Catalysing an Energy Revolution 10 06 Fukushima Rapid Response 14 07 Saving the Arctic 18 08 Protecting Our Forests 22 09 Defending Our Oceans 26 10 Creating a Toxic-Free Future 30 11 Campaigning for Sustainable Agriculture 32 12 People Power 34 13 Your Support – The Key to Successful Campaigns 36 14 Power Shift 40 15 Organisation Director’s Report 42 16 Financial Report Greenpeace International 44 17 Financial Report Greenpeace Worldwide 46 18 Environmental Report 48 19 New Policies, Better Practice 50 20 Human Resources Facts and Figures 52 21 Office Contact Details 54 Written and edited by: Alexandra Dawe, Janet Dalziell, Steve Erwood, Aaron Gray-Block Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the following people who contributed to the creation of this report. If we have forgotten anyone, they know that that our gratitude is also extended to them: Brian Blomme, Kristin Casper, Susan Cavanagh, Tommy Crawford, John Eussen, Brian Fitzgerald, Giorgi Gesini, Kate Hutchinson-Keesen, Caroline Jacobsson, Deirdre Lynn, Harry Moren, Sasha Naod, Jan Oldfield, Sarah Roberts, Therese Schumann, Daniel Simons, Steve Smith, Jenny Stannard, Mark Stewart, Jasper Teulings, Mike Townsley, Natalia Truchi, Eef Verkade, Rob Volmerink Art Direction and Design by: Atomo Design Cover image: Greenpeace's new Rainbow Warrior sails along the Amazon River during her maiden voyage. © Rodrigo Baléia / Greenpeace JN 418 © Jiri Rezac / Greenpeace © Jiri Rezac / Greenpeace 02 MESSAGE FROM THE 01 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR While the exact genesis of the uprisings As I said just before being arrested on In Durban we “outed” the carbon in the Middle East and the demands of an Arctic oil drilling rig: “I did this because corporations and cartels who are working “Occupy” may not have always been clear, Arctic oil drilling is one of the defining to preserve their “business as usual” the moniker “social media revolution” environmental battles of our age. I’m an approach by lobbying against global seemed to stick and follow every step. African but I care deeply about what’s action on climate change. We gave face The use of online channels to organise, happening up here. The rapidly melting to the “dirty dozen” polluting companies advertise and promote demonstrated a cap of Arctic sea ice is a grave warning blocking climate protection. The power “coming of age” for the medium. to all of us, so it’s nothing short of of those corporations is increasing and madness that [oil] companies … see it must be challenged. Greenpeace is Similarly Greenpeace’s use of online media as a chance to drill for the fossil fuels that ready to act. gained considerable traction in challenging got us into this climate change mess in environmental abuse and the corporate the first place. We have to draw a line In naming “The Protestor” as Person modus operandi. Through our Forest and and say no more. I’m drawing that line of the Year in 2011, Time Magazine Detox campaigns, and the “VW Rebellion”, here and now in the Arctic ice.” asked: “Is there a global tipping point for we worked with online supporters to frustration?” The answer is undoubtedly: challenge major corporations and their Fukushima showed Greenpeace’s “Yes, it is fast approaching.” We are destructive practices. capacity to act quickly; our nuclear team’s witnessing a curious convergence of network of trained radiation specialists equity, economic and ecological crises. With this, we have changed the way we – created in the knowledge that it was count our supporters. We no longer refer not if but when there would be another Our campaigns are embracing the to having 3 million “financial supporters”, nuclear disaster – were able to investigate, changes we see in the world, and the but instead talk of over 17 million people document and expose the extent of technologies that bring about change. who have given us approval and agency to radioactive contamination outside the They are working in parallel with the contact them and work with them on future so-called exclusion zone. They provided emerging movements, and calls for equity, campaigns. They are all to be considered independent information to a frightened ecology and economy. But if we are Greenpeace supporters, partners and public, forcing the relevant authorities to to actually “be the change we want to collaborators, and together we have improve protection measures. see in the world”, we will have to pick become more effective and powerful. up the pace. Working with our office in Japan allowed Campaigning with people, rather than us to show that the Fukushima nuclear simply for them, we continue to explore crisis was man-made, albeit precipitated the power of working in and with by a natural disaster. This work played a “movements”, something we are looking strong role in bringing about the nuclear to accelerate through the work of our phase-out in Germany and bringing in a “mobilisation lab” and the adoption of a vote against new nuclear build in Italy. global mobilisation strategy. For instance, Kumi Naidoo building a mass movement to demand As the year ended, we witnessed the Executive Director Arctic protection is a key part of our continued erosion of the “multilateral Greenpeace International Polar Project. process” with the failure of the Durban COP17 UN climate conference. The Greenpeace meme “Listen to the people, not the polluters” took hold across the media and civil society and became the drumbeat of protest around the failed conference. 03 MESSAGE FROM THE BOARD CHAIR Taking over as Greenpeace International’s Board Chair in March 2011 was both deeply challenging and stimulating. It was the year in which Greenpeace celebrated its 40th anniversary as a campaigning organisation, and this prompted us all to reflect on the organisation’s origins, ambitions and direction. It was also the year we launched our new Rainbow Warrior – Greenpeace’s first ever purpose-built ship using state-of-the-art green technology of the highest standards. She was delivered on 14 October 2011, and has visited some 40 ports in Europe, the US and South America during her maiden voyage. While the environment may have been under threat in 1971, it is in a state of crisis today. With the world’s political and industrial leaders unwilling to avert climate chaos, swaths of the world’s forests destroyed daily, the Arctic under threat, and unsustainable consumption rife in all industrialised countries – the urgency of our work is increasing exponentially. Within this context, Greenpeace has expanded and strengthened its mobilisation and empowerment of people all around the globe to take action. In India, tens of thousands of people were mobilised to oppose coal mining in the nation’s diminishing forests; by mobilising Facebook fans we were able to secure a commitment from the company’s founders to run its data centres on clean renewable energy; and through mobilisation and an expanding network of coalitions our three-year campaign in Indonesia persuaded the prominent palm oil producer Golden Agri Resources to end its involvement in deforestation. Other victories included convincing major brand names to change damaging production practices and switch to sustainable production. However, we recognise that protecting the planet “company by company” is not a viable solution – we must work harder to commit industry as a whole to embrace the ethos of sustainability. We also recognise that to do this, we must further strengthen our mobilisation capabilities, expand our coalitions and alliances, and look more deeply into the economic structures that drive unsustainable development. Our task ahead is huge, but we are ready for the challenge. Organisationally, we have worked to re-shape our structure, operations and capabilities – investing in becoming stronger in the emerging economies and building the tools we need in the years to come. We are becoming faster, more incisive and even more global. Ana Toni, Chair, Stichting Greenpeace Council © Greenpeace / Laura Lombardi Portraits: © Bas Beentjes / Greenpeace and © Andrew Kerr /Greenpeace (Dimitrios Vassilakis) Kerr /Greenpeace and © Andrew Portraits: © Bas Beentjes / Greenpeace / Laura Lombardi © Greenpeace 04 OUR BOARD OF 02 DIRECTORS ANA TONI, DIMITRIOS FRANK Board Chair VASSILAKIS GUGGENHEIM Nationality and residence: Nationality and residence: Nationality and residence: Ana is Brazilian and lives in Dimitrios is Greek and lives Born in the US, Frank now lives Rio de Janeiro. in Athens, Greece in Brazil. Experience and expertise: Experience and expertise: Experience and expertise: Human rights, sustainable Human resources, governance, Qualified and practising physician, development, racial and ethical small ship construction and former Board Member and Executive discrimination, sexuality and operation. Director of Greenpeace Brazil. reproductive health, media Term of office: Term of office: democratisation and land rights. March 2006 – May 2012 April 2010 – March 2013 Term of office: March 2011 – March 2014 AYESHA IMAM STEVE FRANCIS IRMI MUSSACK HAROLD KO Nationality and residence: Nationality and residence: Nationality and residence: Nationality and residence: Ayesha is Nigerian and lives Steve is a New Zealander Irmi is German and presently lives Harold is Chinese and lives in in Dakar, Senegal and lives in Belgium in the north of Germany Hong Kong. Experience and expertise: Experience and expertise: Experience
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Combined Financial Statements
    GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL AND RELATED ENTITIES COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Year ended 31 December 2013 GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL & RELATED. ENTITIES Combined Financial Statements Year ended 31 December 2013 Contents Page: 2. Greenpeace International Organisation Directors’ report Financial statements 4. Combined Statement of Financial Position 5. Combined Statement of Comprehensive Income for the period 6. Combined Statement of Changes of Equity in the period 7. Combined Statement of Cash Flows for the period 8. Notes to the Combined Financial Statements Other information 30. Appropriation of result 30. Independent auditors’ report 1 GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL & RELATED ENTITIES Greenpeace International Organisation Director’s Report 2013 was a year of significant change. Proposals for the new operating model, a Greenpeace global resource plan for 2014-2016 and new contribution model were all approved, and will make Greenpeace a more efficient and effective organisation, better able to deliver its goals. It was also a year of major achievements. • The policies, committees, processes, and extra Human Resource staff were put in place to manage major restructuring and reorganization of Greenpeace International and manage the change process; • New executive directors were recruited for Mexico and Canada, and we are glad to welcome them to the Greenpeace family. • The first wave of three-year plans for NROs (national and regional organisations) began, in line with the changes of the new operating model. • The review of the global leadership team was thorough and efficient, and organisational accountability processes are more effective and streamlined. • We agreed a global Performance, Accountability and Learning (PAL) function with an organisation- wide consensus on its role and started the process of establishing a full-fledged PAL unit in Greenpeace International.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Zelko Research Fellow, GHI
    “MAKE IT A GREEN PEACE”: THE HISTORY OF AN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION Frank Zelko Research Fellow, GHI In the early 1970s, the United States Congress’s House Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation held a series of hearings on the sub- ject of marine mammal protection. Among those who testified were rep- resentatives of America’s oldest and most established wilderness protec- tion groups, such as the Sierra Club, the Audubon Society, and the National Wildlife Federation. Although it was important to ensure that the world’s populations of whales and seals remained as healthy as pos- sible, these organizations argued, they did not support a policy of abso- lute protection. As long as the survival of the species was ensured, they believed, it was legitimate to use its “surplus” members for the benefit of people. In his testimony before the subcommittee, Thomas Kimball of the National Wildlife Federation employed phrases such as “renewable re- sources,” “stewardship,” and “professional wildlife management.” The “harvesting of surplus wildlife populations,” his organization felt, wasan “important management tool if the continuing long-range well-being of an animal population is the ultimate objective.”1 A few years later, a group of environmental protesters off the coast of California came across a fleet of Soviet whaling boats. Using motorized inflatable dinghies, the activists positioned themselves between a whal- er’s harpoon and a fleeing pod of sperm whales, acting as human shields to protect the defenseless giants. Whaling, these activists insisted, was not merely an issue of wildlife preservation or resource stewardship. Rather, it was an unconscionable act of violence perpetrated against a species whose intelligence and sensitivity put them in the same biological cat- egory as human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainbow Warrior Case
    1 Rainbow Warrior Case Rainbow Warrior (NEW ZEALAND v. FRANCE) France-New Zealand Arbitration Tribunal. 30 April 1990 (Jiménez de Aréchaga, Chairman; Sir Kenneth Keith and Professor Bredin, Members) SUMMARY: The facts: - In July 1985 a team of French agents sabotaged and sank the Rainbow Warrior, a vessel belonging to Greenpeace International, while it lay in harbour in New Zealand. One member of the crew was killed. Two of the agents, Major Mafart and Captain Prieur, were subsequently arrested in New Zealand and, having pleaded guilty to charges of manslaughter and criminal damage, were sentenced by a New Zealand court to ten years' imprisonment.1 A dispute arose between France, which demanded the release of the two agents, and New Zealand, which claimed compensation for the incident. New Zealand also complained that France was threatening to disrupt New Zealand trade with the European Communities unless the two agents were released. The two countries requested the Secretary-General of the United Nations to mediate and to propose a solution in the form of a ruling, which both Parties agreed in advance to accept. The Secretary-General's ruling, which was given in 1986, required France to pay US $7 million to New Zealand and to undertake not to take certain defined measures injurious to New Zealand trade with the European Communities.2 The ruling also provided that Major Mafart and Captain Prieur were to be released into French custody but were to spend the next three years on an isolated French military base in the Pacific. The two States concluded an agreement in the form of an exchange of letters on 9 July 1986 ("the First Agreement"),3 which provided for the implementation of the ruling.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Shift FINAL REPORT February 2020
    Power Shift FINAL REPORT February 2020 Power Shift FINAL REPORT February 2020 3 Energy Consumers Australia Power Shift Final Report February 2020 Contents Foreword ..............................................................................................................................................................................6 SECTION ONE: THE POWER SHIFT JOURNEY .................................................................................................8 A. Power Shift transformed our understanding of household decision-making ........................................9 The need for a Power Shift .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Power Shift in a transforming energy market ......................................................................................................... 11 B. Power Shift findings ............................................................................................................................................12 Information should be tailored .................................................................................................................................. 12 Consumers can and do change energy use ............................................................................................................. 12 Use a trusted voice to provide information and tools ............................................................................................ 12 Energy is critical
    [Show full text]
  • Australia and the Asia Pacific
    Volume 5 | Issue 11 | Article ID 2591 | Nov 03, 2007 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Power Shift? Australia and the Asia Pacific Asahi Thakur Tanter Ayson Power Shift? Australia and the Asia Pacific The Asahi Shinbun, Ramesh Thakur & Richard Tanter The election of Kevin Rudd as Australian Prime Minister in a Labor Party sweep has led many to anticipate a major shift in Australia’s international relations and environmental policies, and possible realignments in Asia. We offer four brief assessments of the significance of the election for the region at a time when long-entrenched governments in England, Poland, and many parts of Latin America point to possible sea changes in international affairs. Asahi Shinbun Editorial: Power shift in Australia Kevin Rudd Australia's opposition Labor Party swept to He replaces John Howard, who has been in victory in Saturday's federal election bypower since 1996. Howard will retire from defeating the ruling Liberal-National party politics, having failed to hang on to his own coalition, ending 11 years of conservative rule. parliamentary seat in the vote. Labor leader Kevin Rudd, a 50-year-old former diplomat, will be the country's new prime Global warming and the Iraq war were the two minister. main campaign issues. The Howard administration has been less than keen to tackle global warming. The Australian government signed the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on climate change, but refused to ratify the treaty to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Howard was thus a strong ally of the U.S. administration of President George W. Bush, which has withdrawn from the Kyoto treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Re:Imagining Change
    WHERE IMAGINATION BUILDS POWER RE:IMAGINING CHANGE How to use story-based strategy to win campaigns, build movements, and change the world by Patrick Reinsborough & Doyle Canning 1ST EDITION Advance Praise for Re:Imagining Change “Re:Imagining Change is a one-of-a-kind essential resource for everyone who is thinking big, challenging the powers-that-be and working hard to make a better world from the ground up. is innovative book provides the tools, analysis, and inspiration to help activists everywhere be more effective, creative and strategic. is handbook is like rocket fuel for your social change imagination.” ~Antonia Juhasz, author of e Tyranny of Oil: e World’s Most Powerful Industry and What We Must Do To Stop It and e Bush Agenda: Invading the World, One Economy at a Time “We are surrounded and shaped by stories every day—sometimes for bet- ter, sometimes for worse. But what Doyle Canning and Patrick Reinsbor- ough point out is a beautiful and powerful truth: that we are all storytellers too. Armed with the right narrative tools, activists can not only open the world’s eyes to injustice, but feed the desire for a better world. Re:Imagining Change is a powerful weapon for a more democratic, creative and hopeful future.” ~Raj Patel, author of Stuffed & Starved and e Value of Nothing: How to Reshape Market Society and Redefine Democracy “Yo Organizers! Stop what you are doing for a couple hours and soak up this book! We know the importance of smart “issue framing.” But Re:Imagining Change will move our organizing further as we connect to the powerful narrative stories and memes of our culture.” ~ Chuck Collins, Institute for Policy Studies, author of e Economic Meltdown Funnies and other books on economic inequality “Politics is as much about who controls meanings as it is about who holds public office and sits in office suites.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilillllllll\II~\IIII\\II\\I\\\IIIIIII
    Ilillllllll \II~\IIII\\II\\I\\\IIIIIII 200507280 REGULATING THE POWER SHIFT: THE STATE, CAPITAL AND ELECTRICITY PRIVATISATION IN AUSTRALIA Damien Cahill and Sharon Beder In 1990, British political economist Grahame Thompson observed: One of the most remarkable features of the 'conservative tum' experienced in the UK since 1980 is the paradoxical emergence of extensive reregulation of economic activity in a period supposedly typified by drastic deregulation. (Thompson, 1990: 135) Thompson's comments point to one of the central, but least understood, contradictions of nee-liberalism: that a system which is justified on the premise of a withdrawal of state intervention in the economy has entailed an active role for the state in its implementation and maintenance. This article examines the realities of neo-Iiberalism in practice through an analysis of the history and experience of electricity privatisation in Australia. Such realities are contrasted with common assumptions made about neo-Iiberalism by both its advocates and some of its opponents. The case of electricity privatisation, it is argued, highlights not only the failure of neo-liberalism to deliver its promised benefits, but also the centrality ofthe capitalist state and class conflict to the dynamics ofneo­ liberalism in practice. We therefore reject the 'withering away of the state' approach to understanding neo-liberalism. In doing this we are contributing to a critique of the role of capital and the state in neo­ liberalism. Copyright of Full Text rests with theoriginal copyright owner and, except as permitted under theCopyright Act1968, copying this copyright material is prohibited without thepermission oftheowner or itsexclusive licensee or agent orby wayof a licence from Copyright Agency Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013
    ANNUAL REPORT 2013 GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL CONTENTS 01 Message from the Executive Director 03 02 Message from our Board Chair 04 Our Board Of Directors 05 03 The Global Programme 06 A new way of working 08 The Greenpeace fleet 10 Renewing energy 12 Saving the Arctic 14 Saving the Arctic: The Arctic 30 16 Protecting our forests 20 Defending our oceans 22 Detoxing our world 24 Celebrating ecological food and farming 26 04 People power 28 Our dedicated volunteers 30 Your support: Thank you! 32 05 Organisation Director’s report 36 Greenpeace worldwide abbreviated financial statements 38 Greenpeace International abbreviated financial statements 42 Environmental report 46 Staff members on permanent contract 48 06 Office contact details 50 Written and edited by: Matt Farquharson, Edwin Nichols. We would also like to thank everybody who contributed to this Annual Report. Art Direction and Design by: Atomo Design www.atomodesign.nl Cover image: © Daniel Beltrá / Greenpeace JN 472 © Rose Sjölander / Greenpeace © Rose Sjölander / Greenpeace 2 Greenpeace International Annual Report 2013 SECTION MESSAGE 01 FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Campaigning for a peaceful, just and green future is no longer the job of a specialised few, but the common struggle of all. As the distance between rich and poor grows, and the grip of old power systems wreaks ever more havoc on the natural world, our struggle will and must intensify. The old, polluting industries will not give up without a fight. They have had several hundred years at the top, they exert a corrupting influence at every level of our governments and institutions. We must break their grip on all forms of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Organizations Treaties
    74 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Headquarters: Parkring 8, POB 995, A-1011 Vienna, Austria. flagship, Rainbow Warrior, while it was in Auckland Harbour, Website: http://www.ofid.org New Zealand. Email: [email protected] Mission. Greenpeace is an independent global environmental Director-General: Suleiman Jasir al-Herbish (Saudi Arabia). organization that aims to secure a planet ‘that is ecologically healthy and able to nurture life in all its diversity’. It campaigns to: prevent pollution and abuse of the Earth’sland,oceans,air and fresh water; end all nuclear threats; and promote peace, global Environmental Organizations disarmament and non-violence. Organization. Greenpeace International has its headquarters in Friends of the Earth International Amsterdam in the Netherlands, from where it co-ordinates worldwide campaigns and monitors and advises 28 national and Origin. Friends of the Earth was founded in 1971 by a network of regional offices. These provide a presence in over 40 countries. environmental activists from France, Sweden, the UK and the USA. Financial contributions from governments, political parties and Mission. The organization aims to ‘collectively ensure environ- commercial organizations are not accepted. Funding is provided mental and social justice, human dignity, and respect for human by individual supporters and foundation grants. In the 18 months rights and peoples’ rights so as to ensure sustainable societies’. to Jan. 2009, 2·9m. people took out or renewed financial membership. Organization. Friends of the Earth International comprises 74 Headquarters: Ottho Heldringstraat 5, 1066 AZ Amsterdam, national member groups, with a combined membership of Netherlands. individuals exceeding 2m. around the world in some 5,000 local Website: http://www.greenpeace.org activist groups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategy of Radical Environmentalism
    Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, Summer 2008, Vol. 10, Issue 4. THROWING A WRENCH INTO THINGS: THE STRATEGY OF RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM Teale Phelps Bondaroff, University of Calgary Introduction: The current focus on Islamic terrorism has resulted in a lack of awareness of other forms of terrorism. Similarly, the focus on external non-conventional threats to security has meant that domestic threats are being overlooked. One such instance is that of the threat posed by radical environmentalist organizations, such as Earth First! (EF!)1, the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), and the Sea Shepherds Society. These organizations, which premise themselves upon the assertion of “No compromise in the Defense of Mother Earth!” have declared themselves Mother Nature’s armies and navies and represent the militarization of the environmental movement.2 The operations in which they engage, of which there have been more than 600 in the United States and Canada since 1996, have been responsible for an estimated $100 million in damages.3 Though the impact of these operations pale in comparison to those of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon in 2001, they represent a growing trend in environmental organizations, and a growing non-conventional societal threat. The threat is especially real in Canada where many groups find their origins in Canadian-born organizations such as Greenpeace. 1 The name of the ‘Earth First!’ includes the exclamation mark, which places emphasis on their commitment to action. 2 Jonathan I. Lange, “Refusal to Compromise: The Case of Earth First!” Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54 (Fall 1990), p.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Central Characters in Seven Operas from Australia 1988-1998 Anne Power University of Wollongong
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 1999 Voiced identity: a study of central characters in seven operas from Australia 1988-1998 Anne Power University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Power, Anne, Voiced identity: a study of central characters in seven operas from Australia 1988-1998, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Faculty of Creative Arts, University of Wollongong, 1999. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/1761 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] VOICED IDENTITY: A STUDY OF CENTRAL CHARACTERS IN SEVEN OPERAS FROM AUSTRALIA 1988-1998 ANNE POWER A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 1999 Faculty of Creative Arts University of Wollongong II ABSTRACT Composers of Australian operas, in the decade from 1988 to 1998, have responded to social and political events through the medium of central characters. In each of the seven operas in the study, a character becomes the signifier of reflections on events and conditions that affect Australian society. The works selected are Andrew Schultz's Black River, Gillian Whitehead's The Bride of Fortune, Moya Henderson's Lindy - The Trial Scene, Richard Mills' Summer of the Seventeenth Doll, Alan John's The Eighth Wonder, Martin Wesley-Smith's Quito and Colin Bright's The Sinking of the Rainbow Warrior. These operas are studied in three groups to investigate issues that concern voices of women in the contemporary operatic genre, issues of cultural identity and issues of political protest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sinking of the Rainbow Warrior: Responses to an International Act of Terrorism
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NECTAR Journal of Postcolonial Cultures and Societies ISSN No. 1948-1845 (Print); 1948-1853 (Electronic) The sinking of the rainbow warrior: Responses to an international act of terrorism Janet Wilson Introduction: the Rainbow Warrior Affair The Rainbow Warrior affair, an act of sabotage against the flagship of the Greenpeace fleet, the Rainbow Warrior, when berthed at Marsden wharf in Auckland harbour on 10th July 1985, dramatised in unprecedented ways issues of neo-imperialism, national security, eco-politics and postcolonialism in New Zealand. The bombing of the yacht by French secret service agents effectively prevented its participation in a Nuclear Free Pacific campaign in which it was to have headed the Pacific Fleet Flotilla to Moruroa atoll protesting French nuclear testing. Outrage was compounded by tragedy: the vessel’s Portuguese photographer, Fernando Pereira, went back on board to get his camera after the first detonation and was drowned in his cabin following the second one. The evidence of French Secret Service (Direction Generale de la Securite Exterieure or DGSE) involvement which sensationally emerged in the following months, not only enhanced New Zealand’s status as a small nation and wrongful victim of French neo-colonial ambitions, it dramatically magnified Greenpeace’s role as coordinator of New Zealand and Pacific resistance to French bomb-testing. The stand-off in New Zealand –French political relations for almost a decade until French bomb testing in the Pacific ceased in 1995 notwithstanding, this act of terrorism when reviewed after almost 25 years in the context of New Zealand’s strategic and political negotiations of the 1980s, offers a focus for considering the changing composition of national and regional postcolonial alliances during Cold War politics.
    [Show full text]