Ansig/1 - Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ansig/1 - Report ANSIG/1 - REPORT INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION REPORT OF THE FIRST MEETING OF THE AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION GROUP ANSIG/1 (Cairo, Egypt, 10 – 12 February 2015) The views expressed in this Report should be taken as those of the ANSIG/1 Meeting and not of the Organization. This Report will, however, be submitted to the MIDANPIRG and any formal action taken will be published in due course as a Supplement to the Report Approved by the Meeting and published by authority of the Secretary General The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ICAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontier or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART I - HISTORY OF THE MEETING 1. Place and Duration ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Opening ......................................................................................................................... 1 3. Attendance ..................................................................................................................... 1 4. Officers and Secretariat ................................................................................................. 1 5. Language ....................................................................................................................... 2 6. Agenda .......................................................................................................................... 2 7. Conclusion and Decisions – Definition ......................................................................... 2 8. List of Conclusions and Decisions ............................................................................. 2/3 PART II - REPORT ON AGENDA ITEMS Report on Agenda Item 1 ........................................................................................... 1-1 Report on Agenda Item 2 ........................................................................................... 2-1 Appendix 2A & 2B Report on Agenda Item 3 ..................................................................................... 3-1/3-2 Appendix 3A – 3F Report on Agenda Item 4 .................................................................................. 4-1/4-23 Appendix 4A – 4W Report on Agenda Item 5 ..................................................................................... 5-1/5-3 Appendix 5A Report on Agenda Item 6 ..................................................................................... 6-1/6-2 Appendix 6A Report on Agenda Item 7 ........................................................................................... 7-1 Report on Agenda Item 8 ........................................................................................... 8-1 List of Participants .................................................................................... Attachment A --------------------- ANSIG/1-REPORT - 1 - PART I - HISTORY OF THE MEETING 1. PLACE AND DURATION 1.1 The First meeting of the Air Navigation Systems Implementation Group (ANSIG/1) was held at the Meeting Room of the ICAO Middle East Regional Office in Cairo, Egypt, from 10 – 12 February 2015. 2. OPENING 2.1 The meeting was opened by Mr. Mohamed Khonji, Regional Director, ICAO Middle East Office, Cairo. Mr. Khonji welcomed all the participants to Cairo and thanked them for their attendance. He recalled that taking into consideration the global developments related to air navigation planning, implementation and performance monitoring of the air navigation systems, MIDANPIRG/14 agreed to a new MIDANPIRG Organizational Structure and revised Terms of Reference of the different Subsidiary Bodies, including the newly established ANSIG, which is a Group responsible mainly of the implementation issues. 2.2 Mr. Khonji emphasized that ANSIG should, inter-alia, monitor the status of implementation of the MID Region Air Navigation Systems and related ASBU Modules included in the MID Region Air Navigation Plan/Strategy as well as other required Air Navigation facilities and services, identify the associated difficulties and deficiencies and provide progress reports, as required. ANSIG should also ensure that the implementation of Air Navigation Systems in the MID Region is coherent and compatible with developments in adjacent Regions, and is in line with the ATM Operational Concept (Doc 9854), Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP), the Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBU) methodology and the MID Region Air Navigation Plan/Strategy. He highlighted that the outcomes of the MIDANPIRG subsidiary bodies related to implementation issues, as endorsed by the ANSIG/1 meeting, will be presented to the MIDANPIRG/15 meeting (Bahrain, 8-11 June 2015). 3. ATTENDANCE 3.1 The meeting was attended by a total of thirty two (32) participants from seven (7) States (Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates) and two (2) Organizations/Industries (IATA and MIDRMA). The list of participants is at Attachment A. 4. OFFICERS AND SECRETARIAT 4.1 The meeting was chaired by Mr. Adel H. Al-Aufi, Air Navigation Systems Engineer, General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA), Saudi Arabia. 4.2 Mr. Mohamed Smaoui, ICAO Middle East Deputy Regional Director acted as the Secretary of the Meeting supported by: Mr. Raza A. Gulam - Regional Officer, Communications, Navigation and Surveillance (CNS) Mr. Adel Ramlawi - Regional Officer, Aerodrome and Ground Aids (AGA) Mr. Elie El Khoury - Regional Officer, Air Traffic Management and Search and Rescue (ATM/SAR) ANSIG/1-REPORT - 2 - Mr. Abbas Niknejad - Regional Officer, Aeronautical Information Management/Air Traffic Management (AIM/ATM) 5. LANGUAGE 5.1 The discussions were conducted in English. Documentation was issued in English. 6. AGENDA 6.1 The following Agenda was adopted: Agenda Item 1: Adoption of the Provisional Agenda and election of Chairpersons Agenda Item 2: Follow-up on the outcome of MIDANPIRG/14 and MSG/4 Conclusions and Decisions Agenda Item 3: Air Navigation Global and Regional Developments Agenda Item 4: Performance Framework for Regional Air Navigation Implementation Agenda Item 5: Air Navigation Safety Matters and Coordination with RASG-MID Agenda Item 6: Air Navigation Deficiencies Agenda Item 7: Future Work Programme Agenda Item 8: Any other Business 7. CONCLUSIONS AND DECISIONS – DEFINITION 7.1 The MIDANPIRG records its actions in the form of Conclusions and Decisions with the following significance: a) Conclusions deal with matters that, according to the Group’s terms of reference, merit directly the attention of States, or on which further action will be initiated by the Secretary in accordance with established procedures; and b) Decisions relate solely to matters dealing with the internal working arrangements of the Group and its Sub-Groups 8. LIST OF CONCLUSIONS AND DECISIONS DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/1: MID CIVIL/MILITARY SUPPORT TEAM DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/2: REGIONAL PERFORMANCE DASHBOARDS DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/3: PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT TO THE MID BASIC ANP TABLE ATS 1 ANSIG/1-REPORT - 3 - DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/4: LETTER OF AGREEMENT TEMPLATE TO BE USED BY ATS UNITS IN THE MID REGION DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/5: MID SSR CODE MANAGEMENT PLAN (CMP) DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/6: SECOND MID REGION AIR NAVIGATION ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/7: SINGLE ENGINE TAXI OPERATIONS DRAFT DECISION 1/8: MID REGIONAL/SUB-REGIONAL SEARCH AND RESCUE TRAINING EXERCISES DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/9: AFTN/CIDIN AFS CONNECTIVITY AND AMHS IMPLEMENTATION DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/10: PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT TO THE MID FASID – AFTN PLAN DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/11: SUPPORT ICAO POSITION TO WRC-15 DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/12: WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF THE ICAO FREQUENCY FINDER DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/13: GNSS RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE ISSUES ----------------- ANSIG/1-REPORT 1-1 PART II: REPORT ON AGENDA ITEMS REPORT ON AGENDA ITEM 1: ADOPTION OF THE PROVISIONAL AGENDA AND ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSONS 1.1 The meeting reviewed and adopted the Provisional Agenda as at Para 6 of the History of the Meeting. 1.2 Mr. Adel H. Al-Aufi, Air Navigation Systems Engineer, General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA), Saudi Arabia, and Mr. Ehab Raslan Abdel Galil, ATCO and R & D Specialist, National Air Navigation Services Company (NANSC), Egypt, were unanimously elected as the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson of the Air Navigation Systems Implementation Group (ANSIG), respectively. ------------------- ANSIG/1-REPORT 2-1 REPORT ON AGENDA ITEM 2: FOLLOW-UP ON MIDANPIRG/14 AND MSG/4 CONCLUSIONS AND DECISIONS 2.1 The meeting reviewed the progress made with regard to the implementation of the MIDANPIRG/14 and MSG/4 Conclusions and Decisions as reflected in the Follow up Action Plans at Appendices 2A and 2B, respectively. The meeting urged States and concerned stakeholders to take necessary measures to expedite the implementation of those Conclusions which have not yet been closed. -------------------- ANSIG/1-REPORT 3-1 REPORT ON AGENDA ITEM 3: AIR NAVIGATION GLOBAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENTS MID REGION AIR NAVIGATION STRATEGY 3.1 The meeting recalled that further to the MIDANPIRG/14 Conclusion 14/6, the MSG/4 meeting (Cairo, Egypt, 24-26 November 2014) endorsed the final version of the MID Region Air Navigation Strategy at Appendix 3A, which was consolidated based on the outcome of the different MIDANPIRG subsidiary bodies and other inputs
Recommended publications
  • Vea Un Ejemplo
    3 To search aircraft in the registration index, go to page 178 Operator Page Operator Page Operator Page Operator Page 10 Tanker Air Carrier 8 Air Georgian 20 Amapola Flyg 32 Belavia 45 21 Air 8 Air Ghana 20 Amaszonas 32 Bering Air 45 2Excel Aviation 8 Air Greenland 20 Amaszonas Uruguay 32 Berjaya Air 45 748 Air Services 8 Air Guilin 20 AMC 32 Berkut Air 45 9 Air 8 Air Hamburg 21 Amelia 33 Berry Aviation 45 Abu Dhabi Aviation 8 Air Hong Kong 21 American Airlines 33 Bestfly 45 ABX Air 8 Air Horizont 21 American Jet 35 BH Air - Balkan Holidays 46 ACE Belgium Freighters 8 Air Iceland Connect 21 Ameriflight 35 Bhutan Airlines 46 Acropolis Aviation 8 Air India 21 Amerijet International 35 Bid Air Cargo 46 ACT Airlines 8 Air India Express 21 AMS Airlines 35 Biman Bangladesh 46 ADI Aerodynamics 9 Air India Regional 22 ANA Wings 35 Binter Canarias 46 Aegean Airlines 9 Air Inuit 22 AnadoluJet 36 Blue Air 46 Aer Lingus 9 Air KBZ 22 Anda Air 36 Blue Bird Airways 46 AerCaribe 9 Air Kenya 22 Andes Lineas Aereas 36 Blue Bird Aviation 46 Aereo Calafia 9 Air Kiribati 22 Angkasa Pura Logistics 36 Blue Dart Aviation 46 Aero Caribbean 9 Air Leap 22 Animawings 36 Blue Islands 47 Aero Flite 9 Air Libya 22 Apex Air 36 Blue Panorama Airlines 47 Aero K 9 Air Macau 22 Arab Wings 36 Blue Ridge Aero Services 47 Aero Mongolia 10 Air Madagascar 22 ARAMCO 36 Bluebird Nordic 47 Aero Transporte 10 Air Malta 23 Ariana Afghan Airlines 36 Boliviana de Aviacion 47 AeroContractors 10 Air Mandalay 23 Arik Air 36 BRA Braathens Regional 47 Aeroflot 10 Air Marshall Islands 23
    [Show full text]
  • ATM SG/2-WP/19 24/11/2015 International Civil Aviation
    ATM SG/2-WP/19 24/11/2015 International Civil Aviation Organization MIDANPIRG ATM Sub-Group Second Meeting (ATM SG/2) (Cairo, Egypt, 30 November – 03 December 2015) Agenda Item 7: Search and Rescue Issues STATUS OF SAR IN THE MID REGION (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY This paper presents the status of Search and Rescue (SAR) in the MID Region. Action by the meeting is at paragraph 3. REFERENCES -MIDANPIRG/15 Report 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The ICAO USOAP-CMA focuses on a State’s capability in providing safety oversight by assessing whether the State has effectively and consistently implemented the critical elements of a safety oversight system and determining the State’s level of implementation of ICAO’s safety – related SARPs, including Annex 12 Search and Rescue, and associated procedures and guidance material. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 The DGCA-MID/3 and MIDANPIRG/15 meetings underlined that many deficiencies related to Search and Rescue (SAR) have not been eliminated since many years. The SAR deficiencies in the MID Region concern mainly the following: a) lack of signature of SAR agreements; b) lack of plans of operations for the conduct of SAR operations and SAR exercises; c) training of SAR personnel and SAR inspectorate staff; d) lack of provision of required SAR services; and e) non-compliance with the carriage of Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) requirements. ATM SG/2-WP/19 -2- 2.2 Based on the above, States were urged to take necessary measures to ensure the implementation of the ICAO provisions related to SAR. 2.3 The MIDANPIRG/15 meeting was apprised of the outcome of the ICAO/International Maritime Organization (IMO) Search and Rescue-Global Maritime Distress and Safety System Conference (ICAO/IMO SAR GMDSS Conference), which was successfully held in Bahrain 21-22 October 2014, for the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) States.
    [Show full text]
  • Trend of COVID‐19 I.R. IRAN Update 466 / 31 May 2021
    No. 466 / 31 May 2021 New Lab Total Lab Confirmed Cases New Deaths Confirmed Cases Total Recoveries Total Deaths IRAN 11,042↑(+2,166) 217↑(+19) 2,913,136 2,458,684 80,156 Trend of COVID‐19 I.R. IRAN Update Figure 1 - Trend of COVID-19 Laboratory-Confirmed Cases and Deaths, 19 February 2020 - 31 May 2021 600 500 400 300 No. of Cases No. of Deaths 200 100 0 19-Feb-20 19-Mar-20 19-Apr-20 19-May-20 19-Jun-20 19-Jul-20 19-Aug-20 19-Sep-20 19-Oct-20 19-Nov-20 19-Dec-20 19-Jan-21 19-Feb-21 19-Mar-21 19-Apr-21 19-May-21 Laboratory Confirmed Cases Deaths Number of cases admitted to ICU: 4,160 ↓ (-59) Figure 2 - COVID-19 Patients in Intensive Care, 26 March 2020 - 31 May 2021 6,000 5,500 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 0 26-Mar-20 26-Apr-20 26-May-20 26-Jun-20 26-Jul-20 26-Aug-20 26-Sep-20 26-Oct-20 26-Nov-20 26-Dec-20 26-Jan-21 26-Feb-21 26-Mar-21 26-Apr-21 26-May-21 Coronaviru��Update Islamic Republic of Iran| Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) | 31 May 2021 2 Figure 3 - Number of Daily COVID-19 PCR Tests and Percentage of Positive Cases, 13 April 2020 - 31 May 2021 160,000 40% 140,000 35% 120,000 30% 100,000 25% 80,000 20% 60,000 15% rate Positivity No.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Republic of Iran Civil Aviation Organization Aircraft Accident
    “In the name of God” ‌ Islamic Republic Of Iran Civil Aviation Organization Aircraft Accident Investigation Board Incident Report Basic Information: State File Number: I980316TBE Type of occurrence: Incident Date of occurrence: 06 Jun 2019 Place of occurrence: Najaf Airport, republic of Iraq Aircraft Model: McDonnell Douglas MD-88 Registration: EP-TBE Operator: Taban Air Date of Issue: 24 June 2019 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.cao.ir E-mail: [email protected] Fax: + 98 21 6601 8659 Tel.: + 98 21 6604 7965 Mehrabad International Airport Tehran/Iran PBO: 13445-1795 1 SYNOPSIS: On 08 Jun 2019, CAO IRI aircraft accident investigation board (AAIB) was notified about engine failure incident of Iranian registered MD-88Aircraft; EP-TBE operated by Taban Airlines at Najaf International Airport/Iraq dated on 06 Jun 2019 and aircraft was released from custody by Iraq Civil Aviation Authority and investigation of incident was delegated to Civil Aviation Organization of IR of Iran. This report has been prepared based upon the evidences collected during the investigation, opinion obtained from the experts in the territory of IR of Iran. The investigation has been carried out in accordance with Annex 13 to the convention on International Civil Aviation Organization and under the regulation of Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation of the IR of Iran government. The investigation is conducted not to apportion blame or to assess individual or collective responsibility and the sole objective of the investigation is prevention of future accidents or incidents. 1- Factual Information: At 05:59 UTC on 06.06.2019 Aircraft MD-88 ; MSN : 53548 with registration EP-TBE operated by Taban Airlines ( an AOC holder operator of IR of Iran ) experienced engine # 2 failure during take-off roll following abrupt sound and related engine "EGT" was raised.
    [Show full text]
  • Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Data compiled from Flightglobal ACAS database flightglobal.com/acas EXPLANATORY NOTES The data in this census covers all commercial jet- and requirements, put into storage, and so on, and when airliners that have been temporarily removed from an turboprop-powered transport aircraft in service or on flying hours for three consecutive months are reported airline’s fleet and returned to the state may not be firm order with the world’s airlines, excluding aircraft as zero. shown as being with the airline for which they operate. that carry fewer than 14 passengers, or the equivalent The exception is where the aircraft is undergoing Russian aircraft tend to spend a long time parked in cargo. maintenance, where it will remain classified as active. before being permanently retired – much longer than The tables are in two sections, both of which have Aircraft awaiting a conversion will be shown as parked. equivalent Western aircraft – so it can be difficult to been compiled by Flightglobal ACAS research officer The region is dictated by operator base and does not establish the exact status of the “available fleet” John Wilding using Flightglobal’s ACAS database. necessarily indicate the area of operation. Options and (parked aircraft that could be returned to operation). Section one records the fleets of the Western-built letters of intent (where a firm contract has not been For more information on airliner types see our two- airliners, and the second section records the fleets of signed) are not included. Orders by, and aircraft with, part World Airliners Directory (Flight International, 27 Russian/CIS-built types.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Officer David Elwyn Walters Royal Air Force Volunteer Reserve
    Flying Officer David Elwyn Walters Royal Air Force Volunteer Reserve 1940-46 Preface This is an attempt to tell as much as possible of the story of my father’s service in the Royal Air Force between 1940 when he enlisted and the date of his discharge after the Second World War in 1946; his journey through the ranks from enlisted man to commissioned officer and from “Blighty” to Africa, the Middle and Far East and back again. While it tries to tell of a more memorable time in his life, rather than the story of his whole life, it’s fair to say that the period of his service during the war and after was probably the most important part. Many of the details of everyday life are now forgotten, gone to the grave with those who lived through those momentous events but some of the tales are retold here, albeit with some minor unintentional changes, omissions or even additions; that all depends upon my own memory and how much of the stories my father chose to remember and some of the letters that were somehow saved. He was just an ordinary bloke from an ordinary background who found himself taking part in some of the most extraordinary times in history. He didn’t do anything to mark him out from the rest, just an ordinary bloke doing what had to be done as his part to end the madness of war and he survived. If I have to dedicate this small work to anyone then obviously it has to be first to my father and mother and then to the 125,000 other ordinary blokes, brave men every last one who answered the call and nightly flew against the Nazi evil as “The Bomber Boys”; the men of RAF Bomber Command and the 55,573 who failed to return.
    [Show full text]
  • RASG-MID/6-WP/15 17/08/2017 International Civil Aviation Organization Regional Aviation Safety Group
    RASG-MID/6-WP/15 17/08/2017 International Civil Aviation Organization Regional Aviation Safety Group - Middle East Sixth Meeting (RASG-MID/6) (Bahrain, 26-28 September 2017) Agenda Item 3: Regional Performance Framework for Safety SMS IMPLEMENTATION BY AIR OPERATORS (Presented by IATA) SUMMARY This paper provides the status of SMS implementation by Air operators registered in MID States and provides recommendation for the way forward to complete SMS implementation. Action by the meeting is at paragraph 3. REFERENCES - SST-3 Meeting Report 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Currently, implementation of safety management at the Service Provider level is variable, and is proving challenging to put in place the system as intended by Annex 19. 1.2 The MID-SST was established to support the RASG-MID Steering Committee (RSC) in the development, monitoring and implementation of Safety Enhancement Initiatives (SEIs) related to identified safety issues, including implementation of State Safety Programs (SSP) and Safety Management Systems (SMS). 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 The Third meeting of the MID Safety Support Team (MID-SST/3) held in Abu Dhabi, UAE, 10-13, recognized the need to monitor the status of SMS implementation by air operators, maintenance organizations and training organizations involved in flight training; in order to take necessary actions to overcome the challenges faced and to improve safety. 2.2 In this regard, the meeting agreed that IATA with the support of the ICAO MID Office will provide feedback and a plan of actions to address SMS implementation by air operators. RASG-MID/6-WP/15 - 2 - 2.3 The meeting may wish to note that Safety Management Systems (SMS) is an integral part of the IOSA program.
    [Show full text]
  • IRAN AVIATION SUMMIT 2016 Tehran, 24-25 January
    IRAN AVIATION SUMMIT 2016 Tehran, 24-25 January The first international aviation conference in Iran for nearly four decades More than 400 delegates and attendees – airlines, airports, aircraft and engine manufacturers, lessors, GDS and technology providers and suppliers – listened to aviation leaders and decision makers discussing the future of Iran’s aviation market. Some of the highlights were the announcement by Iran’s Deputy Minister for Roads & Urban Development of new aircraft orders from Airbus and ATR, Iran Air’s 10 year development plan, including making Tehran a major transit hub, and Turkish Airlines’ forecast of a doubling of tourism demand within two years. [More details inside] Visit the post-event website: centreforaviation.com/IRN2425 INFORM. CONNECT. INSPIRE. Highlights P14 Minister of Roads & Urban Development, Dr. Abbas Akhoundi Sponsors .................................P3 P16 Executive panel: Priority #1 sourcing and financing aircraft About CAPA - Centre for Aviation ...................................................... P4 CAPA Iran Aviation Summit International delegates ................... P5 Iran delegates .................................. P9 Gallery ..............................................P13 P18 Executive panel: Turkish Airlines, CEO, Dr Temel Kotil Day 1 agenda including CAPA News Briefs ...................P14 Networking dinner gallery ........................ P21 Day 2 agenda including CAPA News Briefs ......................... P22 CAPA Analysis ................................................P26 Contact
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Above the Radar Sanctions Evasion in the Iranian Aviation Sector
    Flying Above the Radar Sanctions Evasion in the Iranian Aviation Sector Emanuele Ottolenghi, Annie Fixler, and Yaya J. Fanusie July 2016 FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES FOUNDATION Flying Above the Radar Sanctions Evasion in the Iranian Aviation Sector Emanuele Ottolenghi Annie Fixler Yaya J. Fanusie July 2016 FDD PRESS A division of the FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES Washington, DC Flying Above the Radar: Sanctions Evasion in the Iranian Aviation Sector Introduction could grow further: Iran’s transportation minister announced that the country is looking to buy as many With the implementation of the Joint Comprehensive as 400-500 aircraft in the next decade to rejuvenate the Plan of Action (JCPOA) in January 2016, most country’s aging fleet.4 international sanctions against Iran have been lifted. These include long-standing U.S. sanctions against A closer look at the body of laws that restricted Iran’s Iran’s aviation sector. The United States has removed aviation sector and their impact over the years offers all but four Iranian civilian airlines – Caspian Airlines, important lessons on the effectiveness of sector-based Mahan Air, Meraj Air, and Pouya Air – from its sanctions. Other important lessons can be drawn from sanctions lists. Companies can now sell planes, spare Iran’s sanctions evasion, including Mahan Air’s May parts, and services to most of the aviation industry, and 2015 acquisition of nine planes. This study will provide financial institutions can provide financial services. policymakers, law enforcement agencies, and private sector compliance professionals unique insights into Aviation sanctions against Iran have no historical this cycle of sanctions and sanctions evasion.
    [Show full text]
  • AVIATION INDUSTRY in IRAN: INFRASTRUCTURE, CURRENT SYSTEM, and FUTURE PLANS and DEVELOPMENT Dana Khidhr [email protected]
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Research Papers Graduate School Spring 2-9-2017 AVIATION INDUSTRY IN IRAN: INFRASTRUCTURE, CURRENT SYSTEM, AND FUTURE PLANS AND DEVELOPMENT Dana Khidhr [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp Recommended Citation Khidhr, Dana. "AVIATION INDUSTRY IN IRAN: INFRASTRUCTURE, CURRENT SYSTEM, AND FUTURE PLANS AND DEVELOPMENT." (Spring 2017). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Papers by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AVIATION INDUSTRY IN IRAN: INFRASTRUCTURE, CURRENT SYSTEM, AND FUTURE PLANS AND DEVELOPMENT by Dana Khidhr B.S., Salahaddin University, 2004 A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Public Administration Department of Political Science in the Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale May 2017 RESEARCH PAPER APPROVAL AVIATION INDUSTRY IN IRAN: INFRASTRUCTURE, CURRENT SYSTEM, AND FUTURE PLANS AND DEVELOPMENT By Dana Khidhr A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Public Administration in the field of Aviation Administration Approved by: Dr. David A NewMyer, Chair Dr. Stephanie Pink-Harper Gary Shafer Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale Jan 30, 2017 AN ABSTRACT OF THE RESEARCH PAPER OF DANA KHIDHR, for the Master of Public Administration degree in PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, presented on DECEMBER 16, 2016, at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. TITLE: AVIATION INDUSTRY IN IRAN: INFRASTRUCTURE, CURRENT SYSTEM, AND FUTURE PLANS AND DEVELOPMENT MAJOR PROFESSOR: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Iranian Aviation Industry: Victim of Sanctions Or Creation of Mismanagement?
    A Review of Iranian Aviation Industry: Victim of Sanctions or Creation of Mismanagement? By: Ali Dadpay1 Abstract Motivated the present conditions of Iranian aviation industry this paper studies the history of Iranian aviation in the past three decades and its evolution from a public franchise to a mixed industry encompassing private, semi-private and public airlines. Exploring its different aspects, it demonstrates how commercial aviation has become accessible in many parts of country through ambitious projects to construct airports in many provinces and regions. It also shows that how increasing demand for domestic air travels has made commercial aviation industry self reliant and in no need to compete in international markets. It exhibits that how government interferes in the industry daily activities through pricing policies, fuel subsidies and granting licenses to fly different routes. Keyword: Iran, Aviation Industry, Commercial Airlines 1 Assistant professor of economics, School of Business, Clayton State University, 2000 Clayton State Blvd., Morrow GA 30260, visiting assistant professor, Graduate School of Management & Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. 1 Acknowledgement I would like to thank Mostafa Movafegh for his valuable assistance and persistence in following up the requests for data from Iran Civil Aviation Organization. I would like to acknowledge Vahid Nowshirvani for his insightful comments. Must be done: Define an index for accidents Create benchmarks for comparisons Study demand for: airlines, airports, routes, aircraft type Explaining the growth better 2 Introduction In 12 months that elapsed from March 2009 to March 2010 Iranian aviation industry experienced five accidents and three different heads of civil aviation.
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing B737-300/-400/-500 Status: Active Or on Order Sorting: Airline 29.08.2021
    Boeing B737-300/-400/-500 Status: Active or on order Sorting: Airline 29.08.2021 Ser.Nr. Li.Nr. Type F/F Status Immatr. in service Engines Owner Rem. @airlinefleet.info 2Excel Aviation Country: United Kingdom HQ: Northampton Group: Alliance: 27834 2692 B.737-3L9 1995 in service G-SWRD 08-2018 CFM CFM56-3 ORIX 24464 1753 B.737-3Y0 1989 in service G-TGPG 01-2018 CFM CFM56-3 Aer Caribe Country: Colombia HQ: Bogota Group: Alliance: 24430 1820 B.737-476/SF 1990 in service HK-5197 06-2016 CFM CFM56-3 P2F-converted by 11-2015 24431 1863 B.737-476/SF 1990 in service HK-5139 06-2015 CFM CFM56-3 ACG Avia.Cap. P2F-converted by 06-2015 24130 1827 B.737-4K5/SF 1990 in service HK-5357 10-2020 CFM CFM56-3 P2F-converted AereoRegional Country: Ecuador HQ: Cuenca Group: Alliance: 28087 2812 B.737-446 1996 in service HC-CWG 08-2021 CFM CFM56-3 24900 2095 B.737-5Y0 1991 in service HC-CUH 02-2019 CFM CFM56-3 GECAS stored since 05-2018 25176 2155 B.737-5Y0 1991 in service HC-CTF 02-2018 CFM CFM56-3 GECAS Aero Contractors Country: Nigeria HQ: Lagos Group: Asset Management Co.of Nigeria Alliance: 24814 2270 B.737-42C 1992 in service 5N-BOC 02-2017 CFM CFM56-3 26699 2485 B.737-522 1993 in service 5N-BKR 08-2018 CFM CFM56-3 Boeing B737-300/-400/-500 Status: Active or on order Sorting: Airline 29.08.2021 Ser.Nr.
    [Show full text]