Amelia Andersdotter Transparency Report 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amelia Andersdotter Transparency Report 2013 Amelia Andersdotter MEMBER OF THE EUropean PARLIAMENT TRANSPARENCY REPORT 2013 2013 Foreword AFTER BEIng elected in 2009, a bureaucratic many issues where I would like to do much mess made me have to wait for over two more. But I can say with certainty that me years before I could begin my term in Brus- and my staff have put our mark in the areas sels. Landing in the European Parliament where we work, and I am very proud to be after such a long and uncertain wait was a leading my team here in Brussels. Amelia Andersdotter is a Member of the European Parliament. She represents the Swedish Pirate Party and within Parliament, tumultuous experience. During this time, she belongs to the Greens / EFA political group. however, I had the incredible fortune of THIS TRANsparency report is about some of being able to follow many political processes the things me and my team have done so far. in the Parliament up close: first as an intern We have compiled it to help you better un- and then as a local assistant for my col- derstand what it is we have been working for league Christian Engström. December 2011 and so that you can check that those things marked the time for me to begin the political are what I said I would do. work. I took this task very seriously: making THIS IS For all of you. justice to all those who have voted for me is a difficult task. I HAD BEen living in Belgium, Romania and Sweden. I believed that the task of representing the internet generation, which is global, would be easier if I had additional perspectives and more knowledge to bring. This turned out to be right, having this ex- perience has made it infinitely easier to see how various policy spaces can connect to peoples daily lives. AS A RESult I have dealt with a wide and Varför engelska? varied range of political issues concerning Amelia är en svensk politiker, så varför är den här rapporten på engelska? Det är enkelt: Amelia our society today: the information society. har ett internationellt kontor och det mesta av texten skrevs av praktikanterna Jan Louzek (Tjeck- Of course, I almost always feel strained as ien) och Galia Mancheva (Bulgarien). Ulf Pettersson hjälpte till med bilder och redigering. there are so many more things to do and so 2 3 Opinions and values “ I hope to change the world. This is what Basic Amelia I strive to accomplish with every talk. DEFEND INTERNET FREEDOM more and more of the internet is a farce. It turning into instruments of protectionism. “ The internet is in a state of martial law: is denying citizens the freedom to exchange Trademarks are used to curb freedom of ex- THE INTERnet age is the first time where the culture and information. Copyright as it pression. Increasingly, enforcement of rights world has incorporated almost all of the there are virtually no restrictions for stands is ineffective; it leads only to fear, is outsourced from the private sector unto knowledge, thoughts, opinions and experi- what the police and security services are unjust imprisonment and the blocking of public authorities, creating double and triple ences of humanity in one gigantic conversa- cultural interchange. costs for citizens that have to pay for the tion where almost everyone can take at least allowed to do. ALL OVER the internet, people remix maintenance of rights that ultimately restrict some part. Its success is built on freedom: culture and share experiences with a very their freedoms. on the freedom of speech and on open and tion society poses several challenges to both unusual excuse “I don’t like pirated vide- AMELIA Wants a progressive industrial free ways of connecting. It not only makes it legislators and innovators: the technical os, but this song is so great I just have to and innovation policy which is based on easier for us all to share solutions to human- problems, while interesting, are difficult. share it with you. No copyright infringement inclusion, low market entrance barriers and ity’s most pressing problems, to educate Politically, the challenge is to withstand an intended.” This is one example, of many, of competition. A framework of ineffective and and inform, but also to criticize and discuss, American industrial policy which restricts how people are unable to reconcile they way strict monopoly rights for various industri- entertain and amuse. privacy to the consumer rights field, rather they need to use the internet of today with al activities is clearly not the right tool to THIS FREedom is bad news to some; to than considering it a fundamental right. the copyright laws of yesterday. Amelia is not achieve these goals. those who benefit from keeping others in THE CHALlenges are many: government alone to summarized this with the simple the dark or disconnected from each other; to military interests and security agencies, with sentence: “Copyright is dead”. A UNITED EUROPE those who do not like open discussions and affiliated business associates, are invading THESE ARe some of the reasons why free debates; to those who have old profits the information society at a rapid pace. Amelia is convinced that copyright needs to TO AMELIA, the European Union represents to guard and easy monopolies to maintain. While privacy and self-determination is undergo a fundamental overhaul, and soon. hope. In many of the challenges facing the They are wrong and they are a threat to the necessary for people to have trust in other information society, not the least of which internet as we know it. This is why Amelia actors, these values are eroded by both is pervasive surveillance and spooky intelli- believes that internet freedom must be not government and industrial interests. Amelia gence agencies, the European Union has a only be defended, but seriously strength- “ We completely lack a debate about what believes in setting a new direction for society chance to take a progressive lead for funda- ened. and policy making, which values the individ- extent of rent-seeking is desirable. mental rights. ual’s right to self-determination and their own identities. MORE PRIVACY “ Together we are strong, at peace and Abolish the government of surveillance UNDO INTELLECTuaL PROPERTY REMAKE COPYRIGHT Break down the barriers - open up the working for a better tomorrow. THE RIGHT to privacy is the right to shape your own identity without undue influence from More free knowledge and more cultural knowledge the outside. The basic protection of privacy sharing AS A PEACe project, the Union is in a unique A DIFFEREnt field of problems which concern in the EU is guaranteed by the charter of place to put people’s interests over the Amelia are all the other intellectual property fundamental rights of the Union and the COMPREHENsive copyright reform is a cen- governments’. The democratic deficits in the rights. Monopolies on knowledge can be nec- European Convention of Human rights. As tral goal for Amelia. The current system of EU should of course not be denied; instead, essary, but special interests have distorted such, privacy is seen as a pre-condition for monopoly for 70 years after the death of the they should be fixed. them beyond anything reasonable. Patents democratic, stable societies. The informa- creator, extreme sentences of years in prison and detailed monitoring and blocking of block, rather than foster, innovation and are 4 5 ✯ A CHIEVEMENTS IN parLIAMENT ✯ During her short but intense term in the European Parliament, Amelia has worked on over 40 different pieces of legislation. These are some of her greatest achievements to date. Defeating ACTA ACTA, AN agreement bearing the full name of serious and unexpected bad consequences Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, was for citizens rights. The support for ACTA an international treaty that — according to started to weaken. the official version — should put an end to THE ROAD to defeating ACTA went via the A citizens thank you. After winning the ACTA vote, Amelia and other MEPs who had fought against ACTA were showered with flowers. The flowers were sent by citizens from all over Europe and filled up the entire Parliament mail room. Standing first to the left is Amelias Pirate counterfeiting in international trade. rejection in several committees of the Par- party colleague, Christian Engström. IN REALIty, ACTA was more an attempt to liament. One of Amelia’s greatest successes intriduce draconian laws of copyright en- was her strong criticism of ACTA within the forcement, border controls and surveillance Industry and Research Committee, ITRE. of the internet. The agreement was drafted As an almost completely new and unknown with all volunteers from across the continent was most likely going to reject the treaty, in secret by negotiators with ties to the me- committee member she became the Greens organized massive demonstrations. Amelia and that the best thing they could do was to dia industries. Instead of preventing coun- rapporteur for the committee opinion on took active part in the campaign against the delay the final vote. They tried but neverthe- terfeiting, ACTA would have criminalized ACTA. Amelia brought forward a severe treaty in Sweden. One of the results of these less failed to postpone the final vote. legal online sharing and crippled information critique of the agreement and recommended protests was several petitions against the exchange and cultural progress. A key player the treaty’s outright rejection. The commit- treaty, one of which was signed by 2.8 million THE NEWS that ACTA had been rejected by in revealing the secret ACTA negotiations to tee voted in favor of Amelia’s opinion.
Recommended publications
  • Romanian Political Science Review Vol. XXI, No. 1 2021
    Romanian Political Science Review vol. XXI, no. 1 2021 The end of the Cold War, and the extinction of communism both as an ideology and a practice of government, not only have made possible an unparalleled experiment in building a democratic order in Central and Eastern Europe, but have opened up a most extraordinary intellectual opportunity: to understand, compare and eventually appraise what had previously been neither understandable nor comparable. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review was established in the realization that the problems and concerns of both new and old democracies are beginning to converge. The journal fosters the work of the first generations of Romanian political scientists permeated by a sense of critical engagement with European and American intellectual and political traditions that inspired and explained the modern notions of democracy, pluralism, political liberty, individual freedom, and civil rights. Believing that ideas do matter, the Editors share a common commitment as intellectuals and scholars to try to shed light on the major political problems facing Romania, a country that has recently undergone unprecedented political and social changes. They think of Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review as a challenge and a mandate to be involved in scholarly issues of fundamental importance, related not only to the democratization of Romanian polity and politics, to the “great transformation” that is taking place in Central and Eastern Europe, but also to the make-over of the assumptions and prospects of their discipline. They hope to be joined in by those scholars in other countries who feel that the demise of communism calls for a new political science able to reassess the very foundations of democratic ideals and procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the European Court of Justice Case of Breyer Mr. Alan S. Reid Sheffield
    The European Court of Justice case of Breyer Mr. Alan S. Reid Sheffield Hallam University Abstract This case note analyses the impact and significance of the European Court of Justice decision in Breyer. The European Court of Justice has expanded the definition of personal data to include dynamic IP addresses. The judgment improves the privacy situation of internet users across the European Union. The facts of Breyer1 Patrick Breyer is a German politician and activist who belongs to the Pirate Party. The Pirate Party was originally set up in Sweden in 2006, as a single issue political party, committed to the modernisation of copyright law in Sweden, following the crackdown on The Pirate Bay peer-to-peer network. After limited success in Sweden, sister parties sprung up across Europe, in order to capitalise on the notoriety of The Pirate Bay. In order to broaden their appeal, the European Pirate Parties set out common themes of campaigning interest, in particular, on issues surrounding the internet, such as open access to information, freedom of expression and privacy. As a technophile and politician committed to internet freedoms, Patrick Breyer vociferously objected to various Federal German government websites retaining details of his dynamic Internet Protocol (IP) address after he had completed browsing. Internet Protocol (IP) addresses are the essential backbone of the internet. Internet protocols are the method by which interconnected computers and devices communicate, share and transfer data between themselves. An IP address consists of either four pairs of numbers (version 4)2 separated by three colons or eight pairs of numbers separated by six colons (version 6).3 The US organisation ICANN4, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering, is tasked with overseeing the interconnectivity and compatibility required for the continued successful operation of the internet infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct E-Democracy and Political Party Websites: in the United States and Sweden
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses 5-1-2015 Direct E-Democracy and Political Party Websites: In the United States and Sweden Kirk M. Winans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Winans, Kirk M., "Direct E-Democracy and Political Party Websites: In the United States and Sweden" (2015). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running head: E-DEMOCRACY AND POLITICAL PARTY WEBSITES Direct E-Democracy and Political Party Websites: In the United States and Sweden by Kirk M. Winans Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Graduation Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Science, Technology and Public Policy Department of Public Policy College of Liberal Arts Rochester Institute of Technology May 1, 2015 E-DEMOCRACY AND POLITICAL PARTY WEBSITES Direct E-Democracy and Political Party Websites: In the United States and Sweden A thesis submitted to The Public Policy Department at Rochester Institute of Technology By Kirk M. Winans Under the faculty guidance of Franz Foltz, Ph.D. Submitted by: Kirk M. Winans Signature Date Accepted by: Dr. Franz Foltz Thesis Advisor, Graduate Coordinator Signature Date Associate Professor, Dept. of STS/Public Policy Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Rudy Pugliese Committee Member Signature Date Professor, School of Communication Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Ryan Garcia Committee Member Signature Date Assistant Professor, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Jihočeská Univerzita V Českých Budějovicích
    JIHOČESKÁ UNIVERZITA V ČESKÝCH BUDĚJOVICÍCH FILOZOFICKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV ČESKO-NĚMECKÝCH AREÁLOVÝCH STUDIÍ A GERMANISTIKY BAKALÁŘSKÁ PRÁCE ČESKÁ PIRÁTSKÁ STRANA A PIRÁTSKÁ STRANA NĚMECKA A VOLBY DO EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU V ROCE 2019 Vedoucí práce: PhDr. Miroslav Šepták, Ph.D. Autor práce: Viktorie Tichánková Studijní obor: Česko-německá areálová studia Ročník: 3 2020 Prohlašuji, že svoji bakalářskou práci jsem vypracovala samostatně, pouze s použitím pramenů a literatury uvedených v seznamu citované literatury. Prohlašuji, že v souladu s § 47b zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. v platném znění souhlasím se zveřejněním své bakalářské práce, a to v nezkrácené podobě elektronickou cestou ve veřejně přístupné části databáze STAG provozované Jihočeskou univerzitou v Českých Budějovicích na jejích internetových stránkách, a to se zachováním mého autorského práva k odevzdanému textu této kvalifikační práce. Souhlasím dále s tím, aby toutéž elektronickou cestou byly v souladu s uvedeným ustanovením zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. zveřejněny posudky školitele a oponentů práce i záznam o průběhu a výsledky obhajoby kvalifikační práce. Rovněž souhlasím s porovnáním textu mé kvalifikační práce s databází kvalifikačních prací Theses.cz provozovanou Národním registrem vysokoškolských kvalifikačních prací a systémem na odhalování plagiátů. České Budějovice 9. května 2020 .…………………… Viktorie Tichánková Poděkování Touto cestou bych chtěla poděkovat mým rodičům a mému chlapci za to, že mne po celou dobu podporovali a byli mi nablízku. Dále bych chtěla poděkovat europoslancům Markétě Gregorové, Mikulášovi Peksovi a Patricku Breyerovi za ochotu poskytnout mi odpovědi na mé otázky, čímž mi pomohli proniknout hlouběji do tématu, o kterém v bakalářské práci píši. Největší díky patří PhDr. Miroslavovi Šeptákovi, Ph.D. za odborné rady, čas a vstřícnost, které mi během psaní věnoval a za podporu, kterou mi neustále projevoval.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • PL&B International
    ANALYSIS European Union court rules that IP addresses are personal data The Breyer case, another landmark ruling on key data protection notions, covers the definition of personal data in relation to dynamic IP addresses and the “legitimate interest” legal basis for data processing. By Monika Kuschewsky . he Court of Justice of the EU only temporarily assigned and change website was accessed, or that of another (CJEU) has yet again issued an each time there is a new connection person who might use that computer. important ruling, interpreting from a computer or device to the Inter - The CJEU then considered whether Tkey notions of the EU Data Protection net. Website operators (as opposed to dynamic IP addresses may be treated as Directive (the Directive) in its recent Internet service providers, ISPs) do not personal data relating to an “identifi - judgement of 19 October 2016 in the usually possess all the information to able natural person”, who can be iden - Case Patrick Breyer vs. Bundesrepub - identify the users behind the IP tified indirectly. In interpreting this lik Deutschland (C -582/14). In particu - address. provision, the CJEU made two lar, the CJEU answered two questions, Though initially dismissed by a important statements: namely: (1) whether dynamic IP lower court, the case was brought • first, “it is not necessary that that addresses constitute personal data for before Germany’s highest civil court information alone allows the data website operators and (2) concerning (the Bundesgerichtshof or BGH), subject to be identified;” and, the permissible scope of Member which referred two questions for a pre - • second, “it is not required that all States’ implementing legislation con - liminary ruling to the CJEU.
    [Show full text]
  • The Swedish General Election 2014 and the Representation of Women
    Research and Information Service Research Paper 1 October 2014 Michael Potter The Swedish General Election 2014 and the Representation of Women NIAR 496-14 This paper reviews the Swedish general election of September 2014 from the perspective of the representation of women in politics. Paper 93/14 01 October 2014 Research and Information Service briefings are compiled for the benefit of MLAs and their support staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. We do, however, welcome written evidence that relates to our papers and this should be sent to the Research and Information Service, Northern Ireland Assembly, Room 139, Parliament Buildings, Belfast BT4 3XX or e-mailed to [email protected] NIAR 496-014 Research Paper Key Points This paper seeks to explain the relatively high proportion of female political representatives in Sweden (45% in national and 43% in local legislatures) through analysis of the general election to the Swedish parliament (Riksdag) on 14 September 2014. Some contributory factors to consider are as follows: Context – Sweden has a range of provisions to facilitate women’s participation in wider society and to promote gender equality, for example: o Equality mainstreaming in government policy, including in budgets o Relatively generous parental leave, part of which must be taken by the second parent o Public childcare provision o Legislation considered conducive to the protection and autonomy of women o Statutory
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • YPE Statutes, Last Update November 2020
    1 YPE Statutes, Last update November 2020 Statutes of Young Pirates of Europe § 1 General Provisions (1) Name The name of the association is "Young Pirates of Europe a.s.b.l.", abbreviated "YPE". Both the full and the abbreviated names may be used indistinguishably. A list of official translations of the association's name which may be used by the member associations is included in the Annex. (2) Seat The seat of the association is at the following address: 1a rue de Luxembourg, 8184 Kopstal, Luxembourg. EPIC may move the seat anywhere in Luxembourg by simple majority vote. The board may do so as well unanimously. (3) Language English shall be the working language of the association. Any initiatives and proposals can only be adopted if they have been translated into English prior to the start of the decision-making process on the level of the association. In the event of divergence or of doubt between these statutes in the original version in English and any version in another language, the English language version prevails. 2 YPE Statutes, Last update November 2020 § 2 Goals The main goal of YPE is to bring together European pirate youth organisations and other youth organisations that work on digital issues and for transparency in government, participating democracy and civil rights as well as their members, improving not only the coordination of their political work, but also supporting cultural and personal exchange. As a federation of youth organisations, education and personal development of young people as well as the exchange of ideas and support of eachother is an equally important aim of YPE.
    [Show full text]
  • 65. Jahrgang 1996
    AMTLICHES NACHRICHTENORGAN DES DEUTSCHEN KANU-VERBANDES E.V. Redaktion: Dieter Reinmuth, Wuppertal 65. Jahrgang 1996 DEUTSCHER KANU-VERBAND WIRTSCHAFTS- UND VERLAGS GMBH BERTAALLEE 8, 47055 DUISBURG INHALTSVERZEICHNIS 1996 1 Allgemeine Organisation, 16 Aus Vereinen und Verbänden Spitzenverbände, Leit- und Grundsatzartikel 17 Von der Jugend – für die Jugend 2 Kanurennsport 18 Ausbildung, Lehrgänge und Kurse 3 Kanuslalom 19 Termine und Veranstaltungen 4 Wildwasserrennsport 20 Terminänderungen und Berichtigungen 5 Kanusegeln 21 In eigener Sache 6 Kanupolo 22 Aus unserem Verlag 7 Marathonrennsport 23 Das interessiert auch Sie 8 Wasserwandern, Kanutouristik und 24 Boote und Ausrüstung Kanuabenteuer 25 Verloren, gefunden, gestohlen 9 Seekajak 26 Messen und Ausstellungen 10 Informationen zu Befahrungsregelungen 11 Berichte, Nachrichten und Notizen 27 Fernsehen, Film, Foto, Vorträge für Wanderfahrer 28 Leserbriefe 12 Naturberichte, Umwelt- und Gewässerschutz 29 Neu im Buchhandel 13 Sicherheit und Kanusport 30 Personalien 14 Sonstige Berichte 31 In memoriam 15 Verbandsnachrichten 32 Autorenverzeichnis der Hauptberichte 1 Allgemeine Organisation, Regattaausschreibung 1996 mit ReVes Kanuten auf dem Weg nach Atlanta3 ...135 Spitzenverbände, Leit- und ..................................................1 .....41 ReVes-Meldeprogramm ‘96: Grundsatzartikel Ausschreibung zur Frühjahrs-Kanu-Regatta Regattameldung per PC .............4 ...184 ..................................................3 ...134 Heft Seite Süddeutsche Kanurennsportmeisterschaften Ausschreibung
    [Show full text]
  • Ye Intruders Beware: Fantastical Pirates in the Golden Age of Illustration
    YE INTRUDERS BEWARE: FANTASTICAL PIRATES IN THE GOLDEN AGE OF ILLUSTRATION Anne M. Loechle Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of the History of Art Indiana University November 2010 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee _________________________________ Chairperson, Sarah Burns, Ph.D. __________________________________ Janet Kennedy, Ph.D. __________________________________ Patrick McNaughton, Ph.D. __________________________________ Beverly Stoeltje, Ph.D. November 9, 2010 ii ©2010 Anne M. Loechle ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii Acknowledgments I am indebted to many people for the help and encouragement they have given me during the long duration of this project. From academic and financial to editorial and emotional, I was never lacking in support. I am truly thankful, not to mention lucky. Sarah Burns, my advisor and mentor, supported my ideas, cheered my successes, and patiently edited and helped me to revise my failures. I also owe her thanks for encouraging me to pursue an unorthodox topic. From the moment pirates came up during one of our meetings in the spring of 2005, I was hooked. She knew it, and she continuously suggested ways to expand the idea first into an independent study, and then into this dissertation. My dissertation committee – Janet Kennedy, Patrick McNaughton, and Beverly Stoeltje – likewise deserves my thanks for their mentoring and enthusiasm. Other scholars have graciously shared with me their knowledge and input along the way. David M. Lubin read a version of my third chapter and gave me helpful advice, opening up to me new ways of thinking about Howard Pyle in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]