DOCSLIB.ORG

418 - Nooksack ! ·! Canyon Creek Winchester Little Chilliwack River Creek Creek Little ! ! Whistler T40-0N R11-0E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
418 - Nooksack ! ·! Canyon Creek Winchester Little Chilliwack River Creek Creek Little ! ! Whistler T40-0N R11-0E Judson Lake ·Æ009 Frost T41-0N R3-0E 36 31 T41-0N R4-0E Creek 36 31 Tomyhoi ! 36 T41-0N Depot ! ! T41-0N R5-0E 36 31 Sumas!! ! ! ! ! 31 ! ! ! ! ! T41-0N R6-0E 36 ! 31 Creek Ensawkwatch Creek T41-0N R7-0E 36 R8-0E T40-0N R3-0E ! 36 6 T41-0N R9-0E 1 ! 1 6 1 T41-0N R9-0E T41-0N R10-0E T41-0N R11-0E ! 6d[ Creek Creek 1 6 Consolidation ! ! Squaw Creek 1 1 6 ! 1 6 Pocket Lake Game Management Unit Bone Creek Silver Lake 1 6 1 ! 1 ! ! Fishtrap Creek ! ! ! ! ! ! ! T40-0N R4-0E ! ! T40-0N R4-0E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 546 ! ! 547 Bald Lake T40-0N R7-0E Tomyhoi Lake ·Æ Æ T40-0N R6-0E T40-0N R9-0E Rapid 418 - Nooksack ! ·! Canyon Creek Winchester Little Chilliwack River Creek Creek Little ! ! Whistler T40-0N R11-0E Lynden Damfino Creek T40-0N R11-0E Sumas River Clean ! T40-0N R5-0E Creek Creek West Fork Silesia Creek Bear Creek ! ! ! ! ! Fork Little ! Doaks TomyhoiCreek ! Quartz Creek Chilliwack ! Kinney Boulder Creek Bearpaw Saar Creek Creek Creek ! ! Stickney Slough Mountain T40-0N R8-0E T40-0N R10-0E Lake T40-0N R8-0E 2021-2022Hunting Season ! ! Maple Creek Swamp Creek Kidney Creek Chilliwack River BreckenridgeCollins Creek ! ! Johnson CreekNooksack Silesia Creek Bear Lake Creek Kendall North Fork Creek! WA Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) ! Nooksack River Jim Creek Nooksack ! ! ! ! ! ! Deerhorn ! River ! Aministrative Areas d[ 544 ! ! ! ! ! Æ ! Creek ! ! ! ! · ! ! Lost Lake ! Swift Creek ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Creek 542 North Fork ! ! 36 Æ 36 31 Kendall ! ! ! · 36 31 ! ! Nooksack 2021-22 Game2021-22 Management Unit ! 36 ! ! 36 31 31 Middle ! ! ! 36 Fork Silesia Copper Lake ! 36 31 ! 31 ! 36 River Indian Creek Fountain Lake ! 36 ! 36 ! ! 31 ! ! 31 Everson ! ! Ruth Creek 36 31 ! ! 31 WDFWWildlife Area ! Coal Creek Coal Creek ! 36 ! Nooksack Creek 36 31 T39-0N R3-0E ! ! 36 ! ! ! ! ! 1 6 ! ! 542 ! 6 ! ! Æ River 1 Creek Bear Creek Dippy 1 ! · Fourmile 6 Kendall ! ! ! ! Creek ! 1 6 T39-0N R6-0E (North Fork) d[ WDFWWater Acc essAreas ! 1 Thompson Creek ! Green Creek ! 6 ! ! ! ! Fourmile Dale Creek ! 1 ! Creek ! 1 6 ! 6 ! ! Lake ! 1 6 Lake Reveille 1 ! ! ! Chilliwack 1 ! ! Wells Creek ! Copper ! ! ! ! Brush Creek ! Creek ! River ! ! ! Glacier Creek ! ! d[ Racehorse Creek Wildcat Creek Creek ! ! ! Nooksack Hedrick Creek Easy Creek ! Tenmile Creek Barometer Public Land Survey System Other Major Public ! Tapto Lakes ! ! River ! ! Bells Creek White Salmon Creek ! 009 Land Ownership Æ Gallop Creek (Township and Range) ! ! ! ! ! · AndersonCreek ! Fazon Lake ! d[ ! ! ! ! ! Cornell Creek Bagley ! ! Tow nsh ipLine FederalForest - Servic e ! Creek Little Beaver Creek Deep Deadhorse Creek ! Deer Anderson Creek ! Razor ! Davis Creek ! ! ! ! Creek Creek ! Wilderness ! ! T39-0N R5-0E! Kenney Creek North Fork Smith Creek Hone Creek ! SectionLine ! ! ! Nooksack T39-0N R11-0E ! Bagley ! T39-0N R7-0E ! Wiley Lake ! ! Creek ! ! ! River FederalForest - ! Macaulay ! Sholes Creek Mineral ! Creek d[ ! Political Boundaries ! ! ! ! T39-0N R4-0E West Cornell Creek ! ! ! Creek ! ! ! Canyon Creek ! 542 ! ! ! ! Æ FederalNational - ! ! · ! ! InternationalBorder ! ! Mitchel Creek T39-0N R8-0E Hanging Glacier Challenger ! ! ! Nooksack River Canyon Lake Rocky Dobbs Creek ! T39-0N R10-0E ! ! ! T39-0N R10-0E ! Canyon ! ! Glacier ! ! ! ! (North Fork) Creek T39-0N R9-0E ! ! ! ! O therFederal Land ! 36 ! ! 36 31 Creek CountyLine ! ! ! ! ! 36 ! 36 ! ! ! ! ! 31 Nooksack River East Nooksack ! ! ! Bar Creek ! ! ! ! ! 36 31 ! ! ! 36 Pass Creek ! ! ! 31 Glacier ! ! (North Fork) 31 White ! Swift Creek Lake Ann ! ! ! 31 ! 31 ! ! State - DNRState - ! 36 31 ! CityLim its ! ! 36 31 ! Salmon 36 31 ! 36 ! ! Baker River ! Hadley Glacier ! 1 6 ! 1 ! Nooksack River Glacier ! 6 Picket Creek ! 1 6 Smith Creek ! Lookout Creek ! 1 ! ! ! O therState Land ! ! 1 ! 1 ! ! ! (North Fork) 6 ! 1 T38-0N R8-0E ! ! Kulshan ! ! 542 ! ! ! Clearwater Creek 6 Æ 1 Crystal Creek ! ! · 407 1 ! ! ! ! Creek 6 T38-0N R9-0E ! 1 6 ! ! Squalicum 6 Munic ipalLand ! d[ Sholes 1 6 ! 1 6 1 Squalicum! Creek ! ! ! Porter Creek Sulphide Lake ! Lake Glacier ! ! ! ! ! ! Toad Lake Bald Eagle Creek ! ! Maiden Lake TribLand al ! Sulphide Creek ! d[! ! Hydrography ! ! ! ! T38-0N R7-0E Creek ! ShuksanCreek ! ! ! Grouse ! ! North Sound Rainbow Creek ! Creek ! T38-0N R4-0E Falls ! Heislers ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Roads ! Creek ! ! ! AnnualRiv or er ! ! ! Sygitowez Creek T38-0N R6-0E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Stream ! ! Creek ! ! Goodell Creek ! ! ! Middle Fork ! ! Scramble StateRoute Bellingham! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Carpenter Creek ! ! ! ! ! T38-0N R5-0E Nooksack Shuksan Lake ! IntermittentStream ! ! Whatcom Jorgensen Johnsons T38-0N R11-0E ! Olsen Creek ! ! ! Shannon Creek ! ! Tinling Creek LocRoad al Black Slough Creek ! Lake Creek River ! ! Marten Lake ! ! ! T38-0N R10-0E ! Warm Creek T38-0N R10-0E ! (Unim provto edPaved) Canal ! ! Standard Sister Creek Boulder Creek ! ! ! ! ! ! Park Glacier ! ! ! Creek ! Lake Whatcom ! Utilities WideLake, Riv or er, ! Wallace Creek Park Creek Blum Creek Crescent Creek ! ! ! Lonesome Creek ! ! Chadwick ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Creek O c ean ! ! ! Blum Lakes ! Morovitz 36 31 Creek ! 31 ! ! ! 36 31 ! Smith! Creek 31 ! 36 Utility T38-0N R3-0E ! 36 36 ! ! McCarty 31 Creek 36 ! ! 36 ! Rankin ! Seymour ! ! Creek ! ! Creek 31 ! Hutchinson Creek 36 ! 36 ! Pipeline ! Galbraith Creek 36 31 T37-0N R4-0E ! 36 ! 1 6 ! Sulphur Creek 6 ! ! ! Hildebrand ! 1 6 Peterson Creek Padden ! 1 6 !! ! Hidden Creek Creek ! Baker Lake ! Ridley Creek Transm issionLine ! Creek 1 6 ! ! 6 Green Creek 6 ! ! Lake ! ! 1 ! 1 6 Railroad Chuckanut Berdeen 6 1 Louise ! ! ! ! Jones Creek ! Lake ! ! Miles Creek ! Little Silver ! ! ! ! Creek ! ! ! Lake ! Pond Creek ! ! ! Dillard Creek ! ! Sandy ! Sandy Creek ! ! ! 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ! Padden Bacon ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! T37-0N R5-0E Creek ! T37-0N R5-0E ! ! Fish Creek ! ! ! Orisino Creek ! ! T37-0N R6-0E ! ! ! ! Saxson ! T37-0N R7-0E T37-0N R7-0E 418 ! Creek ! ! ! ! ! Creek Austin Austin Creek ! Skookum Creek ! ! ! ! Thornton ! T37-0N R3-0E ! Triumph Creek ! ! ! Bell ! ! T37-0N Barnes Green Lake ! ! Creek Creek ! ! Creek ! ! d[ ! Noisy Creek Silver ! Arlecho Creek R10-0E ! R10-0E ! ! ! ! ! d[ ! Creek Anderson Creek Nooksack Rocky Creek ! ! Hayden T37-0N R9-0E East Fork Bacon Creek [ ! T37-0N R9-0E Bacon Creek d ! ! ! Creek ! ! ! T37-0N R11-0E ! T37-0N R11-0E Fir Creek Anderson Creek ! ! d[ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Reed Lake ! ! ! ! ! Samish Lake ! ! ! ! ! Mirror Lake ! ! ! Edfro Creek ! Howard ! Watson Lakes ! ! ! Creek ! ! Creek Damnation Creek ! ! Silver Brannian ! Thornton ! ! ! 36 ! ! Bear Creek 36 31 Creek 36 Anderson Lakes ! Falls Creek ! ! Creek ! ! 36 Ennis Creek 36 31 ! 31 ! Cain Lake ! 31 36 Anderson Lakes Jumbo ! 31 Oyster Creek Wanlick Creek Baker ! Squires Lake d[ Hearty Creek ! ! ! ! Creek ! ! ! ! 31 Cavanaugh Creek River ! Palmer Lake ! ! T37-0N R8-0E ! T37-0N R8-0E ! ! ! Blue Lake ! 1 ! 6 T36-0N R4-0E Welker Creek 36! 36! 1 ! 6 6 ! ! 1 ! ! 6 6 6 ! ! 1 6 ! ! T36-0N R6-0E ! ! ! 6 ! ! Jackson 6 ! 1 ! ! 6 ! 6 ! ! ! Creek 1 ! T36-0N ! T36-0N ! Diobsud Creek ! ! ! Silver ! ! 1 ! T36-0N R10-0E Vernon Creek ! ! ! ! Butler Creek Watson Creek ! Creek ! Sources ofInformation – R3-0E ! Springsteen ! R3-0E ! ! ! ! ! ! Edgar Lake ! Mills! Creek ! Lake Game Management Units ! Bear Creek Oakes Creek ! Friday Creek ! ! ! ! ! ! McGinnis Creek Whitehall ! WA Department ofFish andWildlife; Wildlife Prog ram(2020) Colony ! ! ! ! Thunder Creek Creek ! ! ! 426! Fobes Creek Dry Creek ! South Fork ! ! Land Ow nersh ip Creek ! ! ! ! ! Thunder Creek ! ! WA Department ofNatural Resources; Resource Mapping Section (2020) ! Nooksack River ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harrison Creek ! Politic and alSurvey Boundaries ! T36-0N R9-0E ! ! ! ! ! ! South Fork ! ! WA Department ofNatural Resources; Land Survey Section (2020) ! T36-0N R5-0E Plumbago Creek ! ! Creek Diablo Parsons Creek ! Survey Thunder ! ! ! ! ! ! Transportation andUtilities ! T36-0N R7-0E ! ! Clear Lake Creek ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wash ing ton State Department ofNatural Resources (2011) Wildes ! ! Colony Creek 009 ! ! ! ! Æ ! Creek ! T36-0N ! Creek ! ! · ! Roaring Creek Threemile ! WA Department ofTransportation (2017) Deer Creek ! ! ! 437 ! ! ! ! SamishRiver ! ! ! Edison ! R8-0E USGeolog ic Survey; al National Mapping Div ision(1989) Slough R8-0E Alma ! ! ! ! ! T36-0N R12-0E ! T36-0NCreek R12-0E ! ! ! ! City Lim its ! Edison Helen Creek Olson 36 ! ! ! ! 31 ! Copper Creek 31 Red Cabin Creek ! ! ! WA Department ofTransportation (2011) d[ ! Swede! Vogler Lake Lake Olson Creek Slough ! 36 31 36 31 Alder Creek ! ! ! ! ! Swede Creek ! 36 31 ! Sauk! ! ! Hydrog raph y Creek! 36 31 Grandy Lake ! ! ! ! 36 ! 36 ! Grandy Creek 31 ! ! WA Department ofFish andWildlife, Fish Prog ram(2020) ! Hansen Creek 31 ! ! 36 ! 1 ! 1 ! ! ! Delorm Pub e lish ingCom pany;Wash ing tonAtlas andGazetteer (2006) 6 ! ! Corkindale Creek T36-0N! R11-0E 1 ! T36-0N R11-0E ! 1 6 T35-0N R3-0E ! 6 T35-0N R3-0E ! 6 Lake Shannon ! 1 6 ! ! d[ 1 ! ! 1 Jackman Creek ! ! ! 1 6 ! T35-0N R6-0E !! Mannser DISCLAIMER ! !! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! [ ! d ! 6 Baker Creek 6 ! !! !! ! ! 1 6 Thomas Creek !! ! ! ! River ! ! ! Rocky Creek 1 6 Duetothe dynamic nature ofdata and the need torely on outside ! ! Weber Creek 1 ! ! 1 ! ! ! Taylor Creek ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! sourcesofinform ationthe Wash ing tonDepartment ofFish andWildlife T35-0N R4-0E ! ! ! Day Creek Childs ! ! ! ! Bottomless ! Muddy Creek !! ! T35-0N !! ! T35-0N ! Creek ! Jones Creek ! Concrete ! !! ! ! !! !!! !! !! ! ! c annotacc eptresponsib ilityfor errors or om issionsinthe dataand ! !! ! Lake! !! !! !! !! ! !! Patent Creek ! Hamilton ! ! !! ! ! ! ! [ d ! !! !! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! R12-0E
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wild Cascades
    THE WILD CASCADES April-May 1969 2 THE WILD CASCADES MORE (BUT NOT THE LAST) ABOUT ALPINE LAKES We recently carried in these pages an article by Brock Evans, Northwest Conservation Representative, on Alpine Lakes: Stepchild of the North Cascades. Mr. L. O. Barrett, Supervisor of Snoqualmie National Forest, feels the article contained "some rather significant misinterpretations" and has asked the opportunity to respond. Following are Mr. Barrett's comments on portions of Mr. Evans' article, together with Mr. Evans' rejoinders. Barrett: The Alpine Lakes Area is still wilderness quality in part because of the nature of the land, and in part because the Forest Service has managed it as wilderness type area since 1946. We will continue to protect it from timber harvesting, mining and excessive recreation use until Congress makes a decision about its suitability for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Evans: The wilderness parts of the Alpine Lakes region that are being lost are those which the Forest Service has chosen not to manage as wilderness. The 1946 date referred to is the date of the establishment of the Alpine Lake Limited Area. This designation granted a measure of administrative protection to a substantial part of the region; but much was left out. The logging in the Miller River, Foss River, Deception Creek, Cooper Lake, and Eight Mile Creek valleys all took place in wilderness-type areas which we proposed for protection which were outside the limited area. The Forest Service cannot protect its lands from mineral prospecting or, ulti­ mately, from mining operations of some types — because of the mining laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon and Steelhead Limiting Factors in WRIA 1, the Nooksack Basin, 2002
    SALMON AND STEELHEAD HABITAT LIMITING FACTORS IN WRIA 1, THE NOOKSACK BASIN July, 2002 Carol J. Smith, Ph.D. Washington State Conservation Commission 300 Desmond Drive Lacey, Washington 98503 Acknowledgements This report was developed by the WRIA 1 Technical Advisory Group for Habitat Limiting Factors. This project would not have been possible without their vast expertise and willingness to contribute. The following participants in this project are gratefully thanked and include: Bruce Barbour, DOE Alan Chapman, Lummi Indian Nation Treva Coe, Nooksack Indian Tribe Wendy Cole, Whatcom Conservation District Ned Currence, Nooksack Indian Tribe Gregg Dunphy, Lummi Indian Nation Clare Fogelsong, City of Bellingham John Gillies, U.S.D.A. Darrell Gray, NSEA Brady Green, U.S. Forest Service Dale Griggs, Nooksack Indian Tribe Milton Holter, Lummi Indian Nation Doug Huddle, WDFW Tim Hyatt, Nooksack Indian Tribe Mike MacKay, Lummi Indian Nation Mike Maudlin, Lummi Indian Nation Shannon Moore, NSEA Roger Nichols, U.S. Forest Service Andrew Phay, Whatcom Conservation District Dr. Carol Smith, WA Conservation Commission Steve Seymour, WDFW John Thompson, Whatcom County Tyson Waldo, NWIFC SSHIAP Bob Warinner, WDFW Barry Wenger, DOE Brian Williams, WDFW Stan Zyskowski, National Park Service A special thanks to Ron McFarlane (NWIFC) for digitizing and producing maps, to Andrew Phay (Whatcom Conservation District) for supplying numerous figures, to Llyn Doremus (Nooksack Indian Tribe) for the review, and to Victor Johnson (Lummi Indian Nation) for supplying the slope instability figure. I also extend appreciation to Devin Smith (NWIFC) and Kurt Fresh (WDFW) for compiling and developing the habitat rating standards, and to Ed Manary for writing the “Habitat Limiting Factors Background”.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Control and Sediment Transport Study of The
    FLOOD CONTROL AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT STUDY OF THE VEDDER RIVER by DAVID GEORGE McLEAN .A.Sc., University of British Columbia, 1975 \ THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES The Department of Civil Engineering We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April, 1980 (5) David George McLean In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Cim / moo^i^y The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 E-6 BP 75-51 1 E ABSTRACT The Chilliwack River flows through the Cascade Mountains until reaching a narrow gorge near Vedder Crossing where it flows onto the Fraser Lowlands and eventually meets the Fraser River. Below Vedder Crossing, the river is actively building an alluvial fan by depos• iting its sediment load of gravel and sand. This deposi• tion has resulted in frequent channel shifts over the fan surface with the most recent migration occurring around 1894 when the river shifted down Vedder Creek. Over the last century the Vedder River has been undergoing very complex changes in response to changes in the incidence of severe floods, changes in sediment supply and interference from river training.
    [Show full text]
  • Swift Creek Consent Decree Final
    }: s FILFD COQ N'Y "L-FRK 1 10 k 43 2 3 4 BY ---- 5 6 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON 8 WHATCOM COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 9 STATE OF WASHINGTON, ° 9 2 0 2 7 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, NO. 37 10 Plaintiff, 11 CONSENT DECREE V. RE: SUMAS MOUNTAIN 12 LANDSLIDE WHATCOM COUNTY; WHATCOM 13 . COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT; GREAT WESTERN 14 LUMBER COMPANY; and MILLMAN FAMILY LLC, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS 19 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3 20 II. JURISDICTION ........................................................................................................... 5 III. PARTIES BOUND ....................................................................................................... 6 21 IV. DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................. 6 22 V. FINDINGS OF FACTS ................................................................................................ 7 VI. WORK TO BE PERFORMED ................................................................................... 14 23 VII. DURATION OF DECREE ......................................................................................... 21 VIII. DESIGNATED PROJECT COORDINATORS ......................................................... 22 24 IX. PERFORMANCE .......................................................................................................23 X. ACCESS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Trans Mountain Expansion Project
    TRANS MOUNTAIN PIPELINE ULC TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL HDD FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT SUMAS RIVER AT V10 RK 1114.6 PROJECT NO.: 0095150-04 DISTRIBUTION: DATE: February 20, 2015 TMP ULC: 2 copies DOCUMENT NO.: 0095150-14-SUM BGC: 2 copies OTHER: 1 copy Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC February 20, 2015 Sumas River at V10 RK 1114.6 Project No.: 0095150-04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As part of the engineering design and assessment for the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMEP), BGC Engineering Inc. (BGC) has been retained to complete geotechnical feasibility assessments for horizontal directional drilling (HDD) at select stream crossings along the proposed pipeline corridor. In September 2014, BGC supervised the drilling of three boreholes adjacent to the proposed HDD alignment at Sumas River east of Abbotsford, BC. WorleyParsons, under subcontract to BGC, completed geophysical surveys at the same site in August 2013 and November 2014. Analysis of historical aerial photographs shows that the banks of Sumas River appear stable with respect to bank erosion and avulsion, and the proposed HDD alignment is not expected to be compromised by these hydrotechnical hazards. Results from the scour analysis estimate a maximum scour depth of approximately 2.0 m below the channel thalweg during a 200-year flood event, corresponding to an elevation of 1.5 m below sea level. Given this result, the depth of cover above the proposed HDD borepath remains adequate for the entire HDD length. The HDD entry and exit points are located beyond the dykes that parallel the Sumas River at an elevation of approximately 3.8 and 11.8 masl, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Geologic Map of the Mount Baker 30- by 60-Minute Quadrangle, Washington
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Preliminary Geologic Map of the Mount Baker 30- by 60-Minute Quadrangle, Washington by R.W. Tabor1 , R.A. Haugerud2, D.B. Booth3, and E.H. Brown4 Prepared in cooperation with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Olympia, Washington, 98504 OPEN FILE REPORT 94-403 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S.Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. iu.S.G.S., Menlo Park, California 94025 2U.S.G.S., University of Washington, AJ-20, Seattle, Washington 98195 3SWMD, King County Department of Public Works, Seattle, Washington, 98104 ^Department of Geology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225 INTRODUCTION The Mount Baker 30- by 60-minute quadrangle encompasses rocks and structures that represent the essence of North Cascade geology. The quadrangle is mostly rugged and remote and includes much of the North Cascade National Park and several dedicated Wilderness areas managed by the U.S. Forest Service. Geologic exploration has been slow and difficult. In 1858 George Gibbs (1874) ascended the Skagit River part way to begin the geographic and geologic exploration of the North Cascades. In 1901, Reginald Daly (1912) surveyed the 49th parallel along the Canadian side of the border, and George Smith and Frank Calkins (1904) surveyed the United States' side. Daly's exhaustive report was the first attempt to synthesize what has become an extremely complicated geologic story.
    [Show full text]
  • Swift Creek Consent Decree Final Exhibits A-E (December 2019)
    EXHIBIT A SCSMAP South Pass Setback Levee Phase I Implementation SOUTH PASS RD. Proposed Phase I Project Elements Levees Sediment Basins Upper Goodwin Reach Instream Sediment Traps . D Canyon Reach Instream S R Debris Flow/Setback Levee w N I Sediment Traps . if Roads D t W k R C e D e r r wift C Williams Pipelines S ork S e O North F E Goodwin Reach ek O L Existing Stockpile Levees G Sou O th For C Sediment Basins k Sw if Swift Creek T t A C reek O Sumas River Alluvial Fan ² Feet 0 1,000500 Lower Goodwin Reach Setback Levee MASSEY RD. Figure 1 Phase I Structure Locations EXHIBIT B SWIFT CREEK ACTION PLAN Whatcom County, Washington December 2019 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Cris Matthews (Primary contact) Toxics Cleanup Program - Bellingham Field Office 913 Squalicum Way, Suite 101 Bellingham, WA 98225 (360) 255-4379 or [email protected] Tamara Cardona-Marek Toxics Cleanup Program – NW Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE, Bellevue, WA 98008 (425) 649-7058 or [email protected] Pete Kmet (Retired) Washington State Department of Ecology Toxics Cleanup Program - Headquarters Office 300 Desmond Drive P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose 1.2 Previous Studies 1.3 Regulatory Framework 2.0 Site Description and History 3.0 Action Alternatives and Screening Level Analysis 4.0 Proposed Selected Action and Analysis of Compliance with MTCA 4.1 Definition of Site 4.2 Description of Proposed Action 4.3 Analysis of Selected Remedy for Compliance with MTCA 5.0 Environmental Standards 6.0 Applicable Local, State, and Federal Laws 7.0 Institutional Controls and Site Use Restrictions 8.0 Compliance Monitoring 9.0 Schedule for Implementing the Selected Action 10.0 State Environmental Policy Action Compliance References and Technical Investigations List of Tables TABLE 1 Soil / Sediment results for selected substances TABLE 2 Estimated excess lifetime cancer risks for various exposure scenarios using asbestos dust concentrations generated in August 2006 EPA activity based sampling study.
    [Show full text]
  • 1New Olympic Sports
    SPORT_109.qxp_Layout 1 11/19/19 9:29 AM Page 109 2020WASHINGTONGUIDE Under Construction Washington’s Sports Scene Adds New and Improved Venues Site InSpections5 of Event-Ready Destinations The Evergreen Statelives up to its nickname with these SPG A Premier Travel Media publication awesome outdoor sights www.SportsPlanningGuide.com SPORT_110.qxp_Layout 1 11/22/19 2:15 PM Page 110 Ralph L. Morton Executive Director Seattle Sports Commission Within the state of Washington, pairings of professional and amateur sports, seascape and landscape, and arenas and outdoor complexes are uniquely highlighted. Our authentic brand encapsulates an innovative, passionate, sustainable community that embraces its beautiful natural environment and provides an ideal platform for launching new franchises and hosting premiere events. Award-winning restaurants and hotels provide hospitality to the loudest, most loyal fans in the country, selling out stadiums and enticing season tickets holders. We put the environment at the forefront of our operations, embracing sustainability in our sports complexes, businesses, communities, and way of life. Our stadiums boast incredible waste diversions rates, renewable energy sources, and carbon offsets. Washington is proud to showcase the best of Pacific Northwest culture as a welcoming, inclusive place with stunning, natural beauty and ever-improving infrastructure. Washington has a rich history in collegiate athletics, celebrating extraordinary achievements on the field, in the water, and on the court, continuously raising the bar for success at the Division I, II, and III levels. We are proud to add an NHL team as Seattle’s seventh sports franchise as the city seeks its 16th national championship honor, and continue to build a legacy in professional sports.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Engineering Evaluation / Cost Analysis for the Sumas Mountain Asbestos (Aka Swift Creek) Site
    Draft Engineering Evaluation / Cost Analysis Sumas Mountain Asbestos (aka Swift Creek) Site Whatcom County, Washington TDD: 12-02-0006 Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, ECL-113 Seattle, Washington 98102 Prepared by: Ecology and Environment, Inc. 720 Third Avenue, Suite 1700 Seattle, Washington 98104 July 2013 This page intentionally left blank. 10:START-3\12-09-0003 ii Table of Contents Executive Summary.................................................................................xi 1 Introduction ..............................................................................1-1 2 Site Characterization................................................................2-1 2.1 Site Description and History ............................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Site Ownership History ........................................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 Site Operations and Waste Characteristics........................................... 2-1 2.2 Physical Characteristics of the Site .................................................................. 2-3 2.2.1 Topography and Hydrology ................................................................. 2-3 2.2.2 Geology and Hydrogeology ................................................................. 2-3 2.2.3 Soils...................................................................................................... 2-4 2.2.4 Meteorology ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Count of LLID and Sum of Miles Per State, RU, and Core Area for Current Presence
    Count of LLID and Sum of Miles Per State, RU, and Core Area For Current Presence STATE wa RecoveryUnit CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Chilliwack River 0.424000 Columbia River 194.728000 Depot Creek 0.728000 Kettle River 0.001000 Palouse River 6.209000 Silesia Creek 0.374000 Skagit River 0.258000 Snake River 58.637000 Sumas River 1.449000 Yakima River 0.845000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (10 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 263.653000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 10 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 263.653000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 10 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 1 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Clark Fork River Basin CORE_AREA Priest Lake NAME SumOfMILES Bench Creek 2.114000 Cache Creek 2.898000 Gold Creek 3.269000 Jackson Creek 3.140000 Kalispell Creek 15.541000 Muskegon Creek 1.838000 North Fork Granite Creek 6.642000 Sema Creek 4.365000 South Fork Granite Creek 12.461000 Tillicum Creek 0.742000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Priest Lake (10 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 53.010000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 10 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 53.010000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 10 RecoveryUnit Clearwater River Basin CORE_AREA Lower and Middle Fork Clearwater River NAME SumOfMILES Bess Creek 1.770000 Snake River 0.077000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Lower and Middle Fork Clearwater River (2 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 1.847000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 2 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 1.847000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 2 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 2 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Columbia River CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Columbia River 98.250000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA'
    [Show full text]
  • City of Sumas Flood Letter
    CITY OF SUMAS P. O. Box 9 Sumas, Washington 98295 Phone (360)988-5711 FAX (360)988-8855 MAYOR-Kyle Christensen COUNCIL MEETINGS FINANCE DIRECTOR-Shelley Schultz SECOND AND FOURTH [email protected] MONDAYS OF EACH MONTH November, 2018 Dear City of Sumas Resident, This letter is being sent to you for informational purposes only because our records show that your property is very likely located in the floodplain. The City is working on ways to improve and increase its circulation of and accessibility to information that pertains to the floodplain, in an effort to better educate and assist its citizens about developing and living in the floodplain. Please take the time to read the information below, and if you have further questions, or would like additional information, a variety of contact information has been supplied at the end of this document. OVERVIEW Whatcom County features one large river and smaller tributaries, or streams, that are susceptible to annual flooding events that pose threats to life and safety and cause significant property damage. The large river is the Nooksack, while streams include Johnson Creek, Sumas Creek, and the Sumas River. Snow melt from the Cascade Mountain range contributes substantially to flooding, and ongoing development within the County continues to displace natural areas that have historically functioned as flood storage. RECENT FLOODING EVENTS While some sort of seasonal flood-related damage occurs nearly every year, the flooding and associated landslide events of February and November 1990 represent the most significant flooding. In November 1990, prolonged precipitation accompanied by an early snow melt, caused by a warm-weather trend known as a “Pineapple Express,” caused many rivers and creeks throughout the Nooksack River watershed to rise to 100-year flood levels, causing flooding in both rural and urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumas Mountain/Swift Creek Sediment Management Project
    WHATCOM COUNTY qqrigin/i CONTRACT NO. JJOMOIOI 3 JOINT AGENCY AGREEMENT (20T*r sW15 , l0 5 fi# /e_c SUMAS MOUNTAIN/SWIFT CREEK SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT U.S. EPA REGION 10 WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY WHATCOM COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON USEPA SF I. INTRODUCTION 1467272 Whatcom County (the County), the Whatcom County Flood Control Zone District (Flood Control Zone District), the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 (EPA) (collectively, "the Parties") enter into this Joint Agency Agreement ("Agreement") to reduce the risks associated with human exposure to naturally occurring asbestos within sediment transported through the Swift Creek channel from a naturally-occurring landslide on Sumas Mountain, and/or removed, dredged, transported, or otherwise managed through human activity at certain locations. To address these concerns, the Parties have evaluated alternatives, considered public comments, identified a Project Area (see map at App. 1), and developed a framework known as the Swift Creek Sediment Management Project ("the Project"). As described below, the Project consists of a set of actions intended to address flooding and asbestos concerns for a period of ten years or more. In order to implement the Project, the Parties must first satisfy a number of legal requirements, including those established by the Washington Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The Parties intend for actions selected through these processes to be the subject of this Agreement. The Parties further intend for those elements of the Project implemented under MTCA to be implemented pursuant to a consent decree entered in Superior Court of the State of Washington.
    [Show full text]