DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydrostratigraphy and Groundwater Flow in the Sumas Area, Whatcom County, Washington Sue Culton Kahle Western Washington University, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydrostratigraphy and Groundwater Flow in the Sumas Area, Whatcom County, Washington Sue Culton Kahle Western Washington University, Sckahle@Usgs.Gov Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Winter 1990 Hydrostratigraphy and Groundwater Flow in the Sumas Area, Whatcom County, Washington Sue Culton Kahle Western Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Kahle, Sue Culton, "Hydrostratigraphy and Groundwater Flow in the Sumas Area, Whatcom County, Washington" (1990). WWU Graduate School Collection. 662. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/662 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HYDROSTE^TIGRAPHY AND GROUNDWATER FLOW ,IN THE SUMAS AREA, WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON • by Sue Culton Kahle accepted*'in partial ccmpletion of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Advisory Committee WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Bellingham, Washington 98225 • [2Q6] 676-3000 MASTER'S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master's degree at Western Washington University, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood, however, that any copying or publication of this thesis for commercial purposes, or for financial gain, shall not be allowed without my written permission. Date ;2j MASTER’S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non-exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others. I warrant that I have obtained written permissions from the owner of any third party copyrighted material included in these files. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of this work, including but not limited to the right to use all or part of this work in future works, such as articles or books. Library users are granted permission for individual, research and non-commercial reproduction of this work for educational purposes only. Any further digital posting of this document requires specific permission from the author. Any copying or publication of this thesis for commercial purposes, or for financial gain, is not allowed without my written permission. Sue C. Kahle February 21, 2018 EJYDROSTRATIGRAPHY AND GROUNDWATER FLOW IN THE SUMAS AREA, WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON A thesis presented to the faculty of Western Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science by Sue Culton Kahle March, 1990 ABSTRACT Three types of groundwater systems occur within glacial sediments in a 10 mi^ (25 km^) area near Sumas, Washington: an unconfined sand and gravel aquifer, a confined sand and gravel aquifer, and a generally unproductive clay aquitard. Water levels in the area were mapped frcm measurements of wells and points along stream courses in October 1988 and March 1989. The water-level configurations for the two aquifers roughly parallel surface topography. Water level maps were used to estimate direction of groundwater flow, >^ich is generally to the southeast in the unconfined aquifer and to the northeast in the confined aquifer. Water level measurements made within the clay aquitard indicate that most water horizons are perched and water level is controlled by the surface topography of the clay. The highest water levels throughout the study area occur during the spring, following high precipitation during winter months. Whter levels vary seasonally in response to changing recharge and discharge conditions. Recharge is principally by direct precipitation onto surficial units. Discharge is to streams, drainage ditches and springs and by purtping. Hydrostratigraphic cross-sections were made using data from well drillers' lithologic logs, existing geologic maps, and field exposures. Five hydrostratigraphic units were delineated based on porosity, permeability, geographic location, and lateral extent of the hydrostratigraphic horizons. By using hydrologic properties associated with water-bearing units and hydraulic gradients measured from water-level maps, average linear velocities within the aquifers were estimated at 4.0 gal day~lft"2 in the confined aquifer and 7.4 to 120 gal day^ff^ in the unconfined aquifer. 1 L ACKN(>aLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge the cooperation of the nany landowners and tenants in the field area v^o supplied information and allowed access to wells and property. Thanks also goes to Lawrence Silvas of the City of Sumas and Terry Kliitpel of the City of Lynden for their input during the design stages of the field project. I wish to thank all of the Geology Department faculty for their instruction and help during an undergraduate and graduate career at Western. Thanks to Vicki Critchlow, Patty Combs, and George Mustoe for answering numerous questions and helping with the technical aspects of graduate school. Special thanks goes to my ccximittee chairman Harvey Kelsey and camiittee members Don Easterbrook and Jim Talbot, all of whose advice and expertise were most appreciated. This study could not have been completed without the aid of field assistants. Harriet Beale, Julie Benkovich, Verlen Culton (Dad), Tan DeBoer, Jerry Eide, Tom Gibbons, Christopher Grannis, Ron Kahle, Chuck and Patty Lindsay, Shannon Marris, Ray Nall, Niki Nbrkoski, Alice Shilhanek, Czesia Smith, Lloyd Stevens, and Leslie Uhlig were involved with water level measurements and/or surveying. Special thanks to Dad, Harriet, Leslie, and Ron for their help in the final days of surveying. Lithologic data was provided by Dean Hayes, Sr. and Dean Hayes, Jr. of Hayes Well Drilling and Puirps. Their insights into local subsurface stratigraphy was invaluable, as were the many well logs vdiich they provided for cross-section use. Additional bore hole data was provided by Grant Richardson of Anvil Corporation. Special thanks to Mark Zubel and the Groundwater Section of the Canadian Ministry of Environment and Parks for well log data sent pronptly and free of charge. 11 Financial support of this endeavor came in part fran the Geology Department Field Research Award and the David Rahm Geomorphology Scholarship. Thanks to the many family and friends who were in one way or another involved with this project. Affectionate thanks goes to office-mates Alice Shilhanek, Galan Mclnelly, Harriet Beale, and Kathleen Duggan for their moral support, interest in the project, and conic relief. Special thanks to parents Sarah and Verlen Culton for their lifelong positive influence. My most heartfelt thanks and gratitude go to my husband Ron for his constant encouragement and friendship, as well as for his involvement in the planning stages of the project, fieldwork, and drafting. Ill TABLE OF COOTENTS ABSTRACT................................................................. i ACKNCWLEDGEMENTS........................................................ ii LIST OF FIGURES......................................................... LIST OF TABLES..........................................................vi INTRODUCTION............................................................. 1 FIELD METHODS............................................................7 QUATERNARY GEOLOGY OF THE SUMAS AREA.................................... 11 HYDROSTRATIGRAPHY....................................................... 15 GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS.....................................................26 Upland unconfined aquifer..........................................26 Sumas Valley confined aquifer......................................34 Clay aquitard......................................................40 DISCUSSION.............................................................. 40 Geologic correlations and gecmorphic developnent.................. 40 Recharge and discharge of acjuifers.................................46 Potential source of untapped groundwater.......................... 47 CONCLUSIONS............................................................. 48 REFERENCES............................................ 52 APPENDIX 1............................................................. APPENDIX 2.................................................... 59 APPENDIX 3..................... 66 APPENDIX 4..............................................................82 APPENDIX 5.............................................................. 84 APPENDIX 6..............................................................86 APPENDIX 7..............................................................87 IV LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Sinplified geologic map of western 2 Whatccxn County Figxare 2 Topographic map of field area 4 showing physiograjAiic regions Figure 3 Well and stream point location map 8 Figure 4 Geologic map with cross-section 13 locations Figure 5 Hydrostratigraphic cross-sections 16 A-A' and B-B' Figure 6 Hydrostratigraphic cross-sections 18 C-C'-C" and D-D'-D” Figure 7 Hydrostratigraphic cross-sections 20 E-E'
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cordilleran Ice Sheet 3 4 Derek B
    1 2 The cordilleran ice sheet 3 4 Derek B. Booth1, Kathy Goetz Troost1, John J. Clague2 and Richard B. Waitt3 5 6 1 Departments of Civil & Environmental Engineering and Earth & Space Sciences, University of Washington, 7 Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195, USA (206)543-7923 Fax (206)685-3836. 8 2 Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada 9 3 U.S. Geological Survey, Cascade Volcano Observatory, Vancouver, WA, USA 10 11 12 Introduction techniques yield crude but consistent chronologies of local 13 and regional sequences of alternating glacial and nonglacial 14 The Cordilleran ice sheet, the smaller of two great continental deposits. These dates secure correlations of many widely 15 ice sheets that covered North America during Quaternary scattered exposures of lithologically similar deposits and 16 glacial periods, extended from the mountains of coastal south show clear differences among others. 17 and southeast Alaska, along the Coast Mountains of British Besides improvements in geochronology and paleoenvi- 18 Columbia, and into northern Washington and northwestern ronmental reconstruction (i.e. glacial geology), glaciology 19 Montana (Fig. 1). To the west its extent would have been provides quantitative tools for reconstructing and analyzing 20 limited by declining topography and the Pacific Ocean; to the any ice sheet with geologic data to constrain its physical form 21 east, it likely coalesced at times with the western margin of and history. Parts of the Cordilleran ice sheet, especially 22 the Laurentide ice sheet to form a continuous ice sheet over its southwestern margin during the last glaciation, are well 23 4,000 km wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Blaine-Birch Bay Area Whatcom County, WA Wings Over
    Geology of Blaine-Birch Bay Area Blaine Middle Whatcom County, WA School / PAC l, ul G ant, G rmor Wings Over Water 2020 C o n Nest s ero Birch Bay Field Trip Eagles! H March 21, 2020 Eagle "Trees" Beach Erosion Dakota Creek Eagle Nest , ics l at w G rr rfo la cial E te Ab a u ant W Eagle Nest n d California Heron Rookery Creek Wave Cut Terraces Kingfisher G Nests Roger's Slough, Log Jam Birch Bay Eagle Nest G Beach Erosion Sea Links Ponds Periglacial G Field Trip Stops G Features Birch Bay Route Birch Bay Berm Ice Thickness, 2,200 M G Surficial Geology Alluvium Beach deposits Owl Nest Glacial outwash, Fraser-age in Barn k Glaciomarine drift, Fraser-age e e Marine glacial outwash, Fraser-age r Heron Center ll C re Peat deposits G Ter Artificial fill Terrell Marsh Water T G err Trailhead ell M a r k sh Terrell Cr ee 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2 ± Miles 2200 M Blaine Middle Glacial outwash, School / PAC Geology of Blaine-Birch Bay Area marine, Everson ll, G Gu Glaciomarine Interstade Whatcom County, WA morant, C or t s drift, Everson ron Nes Wings Over Water 2020 Semiahmoo He Interstade Resort G Blaine Semiahmoo Field Trip March 21, 2020 Eagle "Trees" Semiahmoo Park G Glaciomarine drift, Everson Beach Erosion Interstade Dakota Creek Eagle Nest Glac ial Abun E da rra s, Blaine nt ti c l W ow Eagle Nest a terf California Creek Heron Glacial outwash, Rookery Glaciomarine drift, G Field Trip Stops marine, Everson Everson Interstade Semiahmoo Route Interstade Ice Thickness, 2,200 M Kingfisher Surficial GNeeoslotsgy Wave Cut Alluvium Glacial Terraces Beach deposits outwash, Roger's Glacial outwash, Fraser-age Slough, SuGmlaacsio mSataridnee drift, Fraser-age Log Jam Marine glacial outwash, Fraser-age Peat deposits Beach Eagle Nest Artificial fill deposits Water Beach Erosion 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2 Miles ± Chronology of Puget Sound Glacial Events Sources: Vashon Glaciation Animation; Ralph Haugerud; Milepost Thirty-One, Washington State Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon and Steelhead Limiting Factors in WRIA 1, the Nooksack Basin, 2002
    SALMON AND STEELHEAD HABITAT LIMITING FACTORS IN WRIA 1, THE NOOKSACK BASIN July, 2002 Carol J. Smith, Ph.D. Washington State Conservation Commission 300 Desmond Drive Lacey, Washington 98503 Acknowledgements This report was developed by the WRIA 1 Technical Advisory Group for Habitat Limiting Factors. This project would not have been possible without their vast expertise and willingness to contribute. The following participants in this project are gratefully thanked and include: Bruce Barbour, DOE Alan Chapman, Lummi Indian Nation Treva Coe, Nooksack Indian Tribe Wendy Cole, Whatcom Conservation District Ned Currence, Nooksack Indian Tribe Gregg Dunphy, Lummi Indian Nation Clare Fogelsong, City of Bellingham John Gillies, U.S.D.A. Darrell Gray, NSEA Brady Green, U.S. Forest Service Dale Griggs, Nooksack Indian Tribe Milton Holter, Lummi Indian Nation Doug Huddle, WDFW Tim Hyatt, Nooksack Indian Tribe Mike MacKay, Lummi Indian Nation Mike Maudlin, Lummi Indian Nation Shannon Moore, NSEA Roger Nichols, U.S. Forest Service Andrew Phay, Whatcom Conservation District Dr. Carol Smith, WA Conservation Commission Steve Seymour, WDFW John Thompson, Whatcom County Tyson Waldo, NWIFC SSHIAP Bob Warinner, WDFW Barry Wenger, DOE Brian Williams, WDFW Stan Zyskowski, National Park Service A special thanks to Ron McFarlane (NWIFC) for digitizing and producing maps, to Andrew Phay (Whatcom Conservation District) for supplying numerous figures, to Llyn Doremus (Nooksack Indian Tribe) for the review, and to Victor Johnson (Lummi Indian Nation) for supplying the slope instability figure. I also extend appreciation to Devin Smith (NWIFC) and Kurt Fresh (WDFW) for compiling and developing the habitat rating standards, and to Ed Manary for writing the “Habitat Limiting Factors Background”.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Control and Sediment Transport Study of The
    FLOOD CONTROL AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT STUDY OF THE VEDDER RIVER by DAVID GEORGE McLEAN .A.Sc., University of British Columbia, 1975 \ THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES The Department of Civil Engineering We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April, 1980 (5) David George McLean In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Cim / moo^i^y The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 E-6 BP 75-51 1 E ABSTRACT The Chilliwack River flows through the Cascade Mountains until reaching a narrow gorge near Vedder Crossing where it flows onto the Fraser Lowlands and eventually meets the Fraser River. Below Vedder Crossing, the river is actively building an alluvial fan by depos• iting its sediment load of gravel and sand. This deposi• tion has resulted in frequent channel shifts over the fan surface with the most recent migration occurring around 1894 when the river shifted down Vedder Creek. Over the last century the Vedder River has been undergoing very complex changes in response to changes in the incidence of severe floods, changes in sediment supply and interference from river training.
    [Show full text]
  • Swift Creek Consent Decree Final
    }: s FILFD COQ N'Y "L-FRK 1 10 k 43 2 3 4 BY ---- 5 6 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON 8 WHATCOM COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 9 STATE OF WASHINGTON, ° 9 2 0 2 7 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, NO. 37 10 Plaintiff, 11 CONSENT DECREE V. RE: SUMAS MOUNTAIN 12 LANDSLIDE WHATCOM COUNTY; WHATCOM 13 . COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT; GREAT WESTERN 14 LUMBER COMPANY; and MILLMAN FAMILY LLC, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS 19 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3 20 II. JURISDICTION ........................................................................................................... 5 III. PARTIES BOUND ....................................................................................................... 6 21 IV. DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................. 6 22 V. FINDINGS OF FACTS ................................................................................................ 7 VI. WORK TO BE PERFORMED ................................................................................... 14 23 VII. DURATION OF DECREE ......................................................................................... 21 VIII. DESIGNATED PROJECT COORDINATORS ......................................................... 22 24 IX. PERFORMANCE .......................................................................................................23 X. ACCESS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Trans Mountain Expansion Project
    TRANS MOUNTAIN PIPELINE ULC TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL HDD FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT SUMAS RIVER AT V10 RK 1114.6 PROJECT NO.: 0095150-04 DISTRIBUTION: DATE: February 20, 2015 TMP ULC: 2 copies DOCUMENT NO.: 0095150-14-SUM BGC: 2 copies OTHER: 1 copy Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC February 20, 2015 Sumas River at V10 RK 1114.6 Project No.: 0095150-04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As part of the engineering design and assessment for the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMEP), BGC Engineering Inc. (BGC) has been retained to complete geotechnical feasibility assessments for horizontal directional drilling (HDD) at select stream crossings along the proposed pipeline corridor. In September 2014, BGC supervised the drilling of three boreholes adjacent to the proposed HDD alignment at Sumas River east of Abbotsford, BC. WorleyParsons, under subcontract to BGC, completed geophysical surveys at the same site in August 2013 and November 2014. Analysis of historical aerial photographs shows that the banks of Sumas River appear stable with respect to bank erosion and avulsion, and the proposed HDD alignment is not expected to be compromised by these hydrotechnical hazards. Results from the scour analysis estimate a maximum scour depth of approximately 2.0 m below the channel thalweg during a 200-year flood event, corresponding to an elevation of 1.5 m below sea level. Given this result, the depth of cover above the proposed HDD borepath remains adequate for the entire HDD length. The HDD entry and exit points are located beyond the dykes that parallel the Sumas River at an elevation of approximately 3.8 and 11.8 masl, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilization of Floodplains by Salmon
    C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2002/007 Document de recherche 2002/007 Not to be cited without Ne pas citer sans permission of the authors * autorisation des auteurs * Floodplains, flooding, and salmon Examen des plaines d’inondation, des rearing habitats in British Columbia: A inondations et des habitats d’alevinage review du saumon en Colombie-Britannique Tom G. Brown Pacific Biological Station Fisheries and Oceans Canada 3190 Hammond Bay Road Nanaimo, B.C. V9T 6N7 * This series documents the scientific basis for the * La présente série documente les bases scientifiques evaluation of fisheries resources in Canada. As des évaluations des ressources halieutiques du Canada. such, it addresses the issues of the day in the time Elle traite des problèmes courants selon les échéanciers frames required and the documents it contains are dictés. Les documents qu’elle contient ne doivent pas not intended as definitive statements on the subjects être considérés comme des énoncés définitifs sur les addressed but rather as progress reports on ongoing sujets traités, mais plutôt comme des rapports d’étape investigations. sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans la language in which they are provided to the langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit envoyé au Secretariat. Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1499-3848 (Printed) © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2002 © Sa majesté la Reine, Chef du Canada, 2002 2 Abstract The purpose of this review paper was to examine the relationships between floodplains, flooding, and juvenile salmon habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Swift Creek Consent Decree Final Exhibits A-E (December 2019)
    EXHIBIT A SCSMAP South Pass Setback Levee Phase I Implementation SOUTH PASS RD. Proposed Phase I Project Elements Levees Sediment Basins Upper Goodwin Reach Instream Sediment Traps . D Canyon Reach Instream S R Debris Flow/Setback Levee w N I Sediment Traps . if Roads D t W k R C e D e r r wift C Williams Pipelines S ork S e O North F E Goodwin Reach ek O L Existing Stockpile Levees G Sou O th For C Sediment Basins k Sw if Swift Creek T t A C reek O Sumas River Alluvial Fan ² Feet 0 1,000500 Lower Goodwin Reach Setback Levee MASSEY RD. Figure 1 Phase I Structure Locations EXHIBIT B SWIFT CREEK ACTION PLAN Whatcom County, Washington December 2019 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Cris Matthews (Primary contact) Toxics Cleanup Program - Bellingham Field Office 913 Squalicum Way, Suite 101 Bellingham, WA 98225 (360) 255-4379 or [email protected] Tamara Cardona-Marek Toxics Cleanup Program – NW Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE, Bellevue, WA 98008 (425) 649-7058 or [email protected] Pete Kmet (Retired) Washington State Department of Ecology Toxics Cleanup Program - Headquarters Office 300 Desmond Drive P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose 1.2 Previous Studies 1.3 Regulatory Framework 2.0 Site Description and History 3.0 Action Alternatives and Screening Level Analysis 4.0 Proposed Selected Action and Analysis of Compliance with MTCA 4.1 Definition of Site 4.2 Description of Proposed Action 4.3 Analysis of Selected Remedy for Compliance with MTCA 5.0 Environmental Standards 6.0 Applicable Local, State, and Federal Laws 7.0 Institutional Controls and Site Use Restrictions 8.0 Compliance Monitoring 9.0 Schedule for Implementing the Selected Action 10.0 State Environmental Policy Action Compliance References and Technical Investigations List of Tables TABLE 1 Soil / Sediment results for selected substances TABLE 2 Estimated excess lifetime cancer risks for various exposure scenarios using asbestos dust concentrations generated in August 2006 EPA activity based sampling study.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Engineering Evaluation / Cost Analysis for the Sumas Mountain Asbestos (Aka Swift Creek) Site
    Draft Engineering Evaluation / Cost Analysis Sumas Mountain Asbestos (aka Swift Creek) Site Whatcom County, Washington TDD: 12-02-0006 Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, ECL-113 Seattle, Washington 98102 Prepared by: Ecology and Environment, Inc. 720 Third Avenue, Suite 1700 Seattle, Washington 98104 July 2013 This page intentionally left blank. 10:START-3\12-09-0003 ii Table of Contents Executive Summary.................................................................................xi 1 Introduction ..............................................................................1-1 2 Site Characterization................................................................2-1 2.1 Site Description and History ............................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Site Ownership History ........................................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 Site Operations and Waste Characteristics........................................... 2-1 2.2 Physical Characteristics of the Site .................................................................. 2-3 2.2.1 Topography and Hydrology ................................................................. 2-3 2.2.2 Geology and Hydrogeology ................................................................. 2-3 2.2.3 Soils...................................................................................................... 2-4 2.2.4 Meteorology ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Sumas Flood Letter
    CITY OF SUMAS P. O. Box 9 Sumas, Washington 98295 Phone (360)988-5711 FAX (360)988-8855 MAYOR-Kyle Christensen COUNCIL MEETINGS FINANCE DIRECTOR-Shelley Schultz SECOND AND FOURTH [email protected] MONDAYS OF EACH MONTH November, 2018 Dear City of Sumas Resident, This letter is being sent to you for informational purposes only because our records show that your property is very likely located in the floodplain. The City is working on ways to improve and increase its circulation of and accessibility to information that pertains to the floodplain, in an effort to better educate and assist its citizens about developing and living in the floodplain. Please take the time to read the information below, and if you have further questions, or would like additional information, a variety of contact information has been supplied at the end of this document. OVERVIEW Whatcom County features one large river and smaller tributaries, or streams, that are susceptible to annual flooding events that pose threats to life and safety and cause significant property damage. The large river is the Nooksack, while streams include Johnson Creek, Sumas Creek, and the Sumas River. Snow melt from the Cascade Mountain range contributes substantially to flooding, and ongoing development within the County continues to displace natural areas that have historically functioned as flood storage. RECENT FLOODING EVENTS While some sort of seasonal flood-related damage occurs nearly every year, the flooding and associated landslide events of February and November 1990 represent the most significant flooding. In November 1990, prolonged precipitation accompanied by an early snow melt, caused by a warm-weather trend known as a “Pineapple Express,” caused many rivers and creeks throughout the Nooksack River watershed to rise to 100-year flood levels, causing flooding in both rural and urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Large, Late Pleistocene Outburst floods Preserved in Saanich Inlet Sediments, Vancouver Island, Canada A
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Quaternary Science Reviews 22 (2003) 2327–2334 Record of large, Late Pleistocene outburst floods preserved in Saanich Inlet sediments, Vancouver Island, Canada A. Blais-Stevensa,*, J.J. Clagueb,c, R.W. Mathewesd, R.J. Hebdae, B.D. Bornholdf a Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ont., Canada K1A 0E8 b Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada BC V5A 1S6 c Geological Survey of Canada, 101-605 Robson Street, Vancouver, Canada BC V6B 5J3 d Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada BC V5A 1S6 e Royal British Columbia Museum, P.O. Box 9815 Stn. Prov. Gov., Victoria, Canada BC V8W 9W2 f School of Earth and Ocean Science, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Stn. CSC, Victoria, Canada BC V8W 3P6 Received 23 December 2002; accepted 27 June 2003 Abstract Two anomalous, gray, silty clay beds are present in ODP cores collected from Saanich Inlet, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. The beds, which date to about 10,500 14C yr BP (11,000 calendar years BP), contain Tertiary pollen derived from sedimentary rocks found only in the Fraser Lowland, on the mainland of British Columbia and Washington just east of the Strait of Georgia. Abundant illite-muscovite in the sediments supports a Fraser Lowland provenance. The clay beds are probably distal deposits of huge floods that swept through the Fraser Lowland at the end of the Pleistocene. Muddy overflow plumes from these floods crossed the Strait of Georgia and entered Saanich Inlet, where the sediment settled from suspension and blanketed diatom-rich mud on the fiord floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumas Mountain/Swift Creek Sediment Management Project
    WHATCOM COUNTY qqrigin/i CONTRACT NO. JJOMOIOI 3 JOINT AGENCY AGREEMENT (20T*r sW15 , l0 5 fi# /e_c SUMAS MOUNTAIN/SWIFT CREEK SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT U.S. EPA REGION 10 WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY WHATCOM COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON USEPA SF I. INTRODUCTION 1467272 Whatcom County (the County), the Whatcom County Flood Control Zone District (Flood Control Zone District), the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 (EPA) (collectively, "the Parties") enter into this Joint Agency Agreement ("Agreement") to reduce the risks associated with human exposure to naturally occurring asbestos within sediment transported through the Swift Creek channel from a naturally-occurring landslide on Sumas Mountain, and/or removed, dredged, transported, or otherwise managed through human activity at certain locations. To address these concerns, the Parties have evaluated alternatives, considered public comments, identified a Project Area (see map at App. 1), and developed a framework known as the Swift Creek Sediment Management Project ("the Project"). As described below, the Project consists of a set of actions intended to address flooding and asbestos concerns for a period of ten years or more. In order to implement the Project, the Parties must first satisfy a number of legal requirements, including those established by the Washington Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The Parties intend for actions selected through these processes to be the subject of this Agreement. The Parties further intend for those elements of the Project implemented under MTCA to be implemented pursuant to a consent decree entered in Superior Court of the State of Washington.
    [Show full text]