DOCSLIB.ORG

Rocky River Watershed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rocky River Watershed ROCKY RIVE R WATE R SHED Subbasin HUC 03040105 WATER QUALITY OVERVIE W - PEE DEE RIVER BASIN PLAN Rocky River HUC 03040105 2008 YADKIN NC DWQ WATERSHE D AT A GLANCE This subbasin is located adjacent to the City of Charlotte where rapid development CO UNTIES along with limited stream waste assimilation capacity is having a major impact on water quality. Of the monitored waters, 29 percent are supporting and 65 percent Anson, Cabarrus, Iredell, are impaired. New impairments corresponded with an increase in number of sample Mecklenburg, Rowan, Stanley, sites, indicating as more monitoring is done more water quality problems will likely Union be detected. The network of ambient monitoring sites in the Rocky River watershed MUNICIPALITIES indicate that turbidity and nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) are notably higher Albemarle, Charlotte, in this area than in other parts of the Yadkin – Pee Dee River basin. Fecal coliform China Grove, Concord, bacteria, iron, and copper are also pollutants of concern in this watershed. Iron and Cornelius, Davidson, Gold copper occur naturally in the soils of this region and further investigation is needed Hill, Harrisburg, Huntersville, to determine the groundwater contribution of these metals to surface waters. Other Indian Trail, Kannapolis, possible sources include nonpoint source runoff from urban areas and waste land- Lake Park, Landis, Locust, application sites. Goose Creek is the home to the endangered Carolina Heelsplitter Marshville, Matthews, Mint Mussel which requires special land use management strategies to protect and restore Hill, Mooresville, Mount its habitat. Pleasant, New London, Norwood, Oakboro, GENERAL DESCRIPTI O N Peachland, Richfield, The Rocky River is the largest tributary of the Yadkin - Pee Dee River and flows Stallings, Stanfield, Wingate for almost 100 miles from its headwaters near Mooresville in Iredell County to PER M ITTE D FACILITIES its confluence with the Pee Dee River. Coddle Creek is a major tributary in the northwestern part of the watershed, while Irish Buffalo Creek, Goose Creek, and NPDES WWTP: Crooked Creek drain central portion of the watershed. Major 8 Minor 45 This region contains many rapidly growing urban areas including Mooresville, NPDES Nondischarge: 24 Concord, Cornelius, Davidson, Huntersville, eastern Mecklenburg County, Concord, NPDES Stormwater: and Kannapolis. Pressure from urban expansion is rapidly shifting agricultural land General 141 towards residential and commercial uses. Stream degradation due to impacts from Individual 9 this shift is the greatest threat to water quality in the area. Phase II 10 Animal Operations: 75 Going downstream, stream type shifts from those characterized by sandy substrates STREA M SU mm ARY and generally consistent summer flow regimes to those characterized by low summer Total Streams:.......1,158.3mi flows, extensive bedrock formations, and the prevalence of boulder and cobble Total Monitored:.......605.8mi substrate. These are considered Carolina Slate Belt streams and are found primarily Total Supporting:......175.3mi in eastern Cabarrus and Union Counties. Total Impaired:........392.9mi Total Not Rated:.......37.6 mi Big Bear, Long, Richardson, and Lanes Creeks form the major tributaries in the Total No Data:........552.5 mi southeastern portion of the Rocky River watershed. These are all considered Slate Belt Streams. The Albemarle WWTP and the Town of Oakboro’s WWTP both discharge to Long Creek. The Towns of Marshville, Wingate, and Monroe (along the US 74 corridor) are the large urban areas area. The Monroe WWTP is a major discharge to Richardson Creek. Land use in this area is mostly comprised of hay fields and pasture, although there are large numbers of swine and poultry operations. Moreover, numerous confined animal operations (CAFOs) are found in the Richardson and Lanes Creeks catchments. Many of these operations land apply their manure or litter. The effect of long-term land application programs on water quality is unknown. 1 NC DWQ YADKIN - PEE DEE RIVER BASIN PLAN Rocky River HUC 03040105 2008 2 F I G URE Yadkin - Pee D%2)"¡[¢àee)"à River Basin *# ¡[)"à *# ¡¢*# 5-1. Rocky River and Lynch)"àes River Watersheds *# )"à )"à *# #0)"à )"à ¡[ # )"à * #0 )"à )"à 8-D#igit HUC 03040105 and 03040202 )"à "à 0 ")à )"à ) )"à)"à)"à ¡[)"à R *# # XY#0)"à")à )"à *IREDELL ROWAN O *# CKY R ¡[)"à #0 D ##0%2 o Kanapolis u * )"à t c c I *# h k r )"à C y i *# s # * o %2 "à ¡[")à¡¢ B ) h # l 0 R %2 R d i u v B NC-49 e W ")à r u ffalo IVER ff a Cr *##0 a t e )"à e e #0 lo ")¡[à k Clarke #0 *# C r #0 #0 C )"à re C #0 L )"àr ek e re )"à o *# W e "à k e n ¡[) ¡[ g *# )"à *# C k *# )"à o # C XY d * )"à r d e *# *# ATERSHE MECK. e *# le )"à k C Concord )"à ¡[ )"à )"à *# r )"à ¡¢ Malla e e Albemarle ¡¢ rd )"à¡¢ ¡¢ k ¡¢ )"à¡[ C ¡[ B ¡[ r CABARRUS e #0 ¡[")à¡¢ ig #0 e k )"à STANLY )"à )"à )"¡[à¡¢ ¡¢ B )"à ¡¢ XYXY ¡[)"à e ¡[ XY a )"¡[à D Charlotte )"à¡¢ XY )"à¡¢ r )"à )"à XY ")à "à ¡¢ )"à C ) )"à )"à ¡[ r HUC k e ek ¡[ ee e *# ¡¢ re *# )"à r Stony k )"à#0 C *# #C Run ck #0 d*#y0 ¡[)"à Legend )"à ")à )"àa Ree )"à #0 )"à B *##*# )"à #0 * )"à )"à #0 Locust *# )"à *# ¡¢ 03040105 Monitoring Stations #0 #0 #0 8 *#)"à )"à#0 3 I 1 *# s - *# l ¡[)"à a # *# * C ¡[ n N Fish *# d *# *# # *# )"à *# *# ¡¢ * C %2)"à¡¢ ¡¢ r *# ¡¢ ¡[ ¡[)"à *# *# e *#")à Ambient # e )"à # * k )"à *#¡¢ #0*¡¢ ¡[ )"à ¡¢ )"à Ro *# Benthos *# *# )"à ck )"à ¡¢ y Rive r ¡[ NPDES Non Discharge Permits %2 k )"à XY #0 ee )"à )"à )"à M"àin)"tàHill #0 r ¡¢ *# )*#)"à C ¡[)"à )"à %2 )"¡¢à ")à¡¢ e ¡¢ ¡[ Major *# *#)"¡¢à s ¡¢ *#)"à )"àGo o *# *# )"à N *# ")à k # . rk Cr e N 0 Minor F o )"oào r")eà C *# *# # ¡[¡¢ k C -7 * ed¡[)"¡¢à k 4 e 2 XY re N NPDES Discharger Permits ¡[)"à C C S - k 2 ¡[ . d Unionville k e e 1 k F r C 8 "à e o )"à r k ) ¡[ e o o )"à¡¢ r ¡[)"à e XY Major )"à UNION C r C )"à¡¢ n s *# #0 *# o e Minor # s m ¡[ * d a %2 )"à¡¢ r J a h Aquatic Life Rating ¡[ ")à ic ¡[ R Impaired )"à¡¢ XY US-74 %2 Monroe )"à No Data ¡[ )"àà ¡[ reek XY)"¡[à¡¢ ¡[ m C ¡[ da Not Rated er # Be av 0 )"à #0 Supporting ¡¢ ")¡[à Primary Roads #0 )"à )"à )"à ¡[ Municipality Boundary )"à #0 )"à ® County Boundary ¡[)"à 8-Digit HUC Boundary 0 3 6 12 DWQ Planning Section ¡[ Basinwide Planning Unit Miles July, 2008 CURRENT STATUS AN D SIGNIFICANT ISSUES Impaired streams are those streams not meeting their associated water quality standards in more than 10 percent of the samples taken within the assessment period (January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2006) and impacted streams are those not meeting water quality standards in 7 to 9 percent of the samples. The Use Support report provides information on how and why water quality ratings are determined and DWQ’s “Redbook” describes in detail water quality standards for each waterbody classification. For a general discussion of water quality parameters, potential issues, and rules please see “Supplemental Guide to North Carolina’s Basinwide Planning: Support Document for Basinwide Water Quality Plans” Figure 5-1. shows monitoring station locations and impaired streams for the Rocky River subbasin. Appendix A provides descriptions of all monitored waterbodies in the subbasin. Appendix B. provides a summary of each ambient data monitoring station. - PEE DEE RIVER BASIN PLAN Rocky River HUC 03040105 2008 YADKIN NC DWQ Appendix C provides summaries of biological and fish assessment monitoring sites. General Biological Health Thirteen benthic and twenty-one fish sites were sampled as part of the five-year basinwide sampling program. Additionally, several special studies were conducted during the assessment period including TMDL stressor studies of McKee and Coddle Creeks, a detailed assessment of benthic communities in the upper Rocky River watershed, and a survey to assess urban fish populations. Of the sites that were sampled in both 2001 and 2006, over thirty percent declined in bioclassification while just twenty percent showed an improvement. Further, the total number of samples increased by 41 percent and corresponded to a 37 percent increase in the number of impaired sites. This suggests that as further investigations are performed, more water quality problems are uncovered. (Figure 5-2) FI G URE 5-2. BI O L og ICAL HEALTH SU mm ARY Biological Community 2001 Biological Community Ratings 2006 Biological Community Ratings Population Shifts: 2001 - 2006 n = 24 n = 34 Supporting 20% Supporting Impaired 66% Impaired 32% 75% 25% 34% Improved No Change Declined 48% Wetlands Restoration Program Rocky River Study In response to existing impacts from agricultural land uses and anticipated residential growth, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP, formerly the Wetlands Restoration Program) targeted the Rocky River Watershed for water quality and habitat quality improvements. DWQ sampled twenty stream sites in southern Iredell County, southern Rowan County, eastern Mecklenburg County, and most of western Cabarrus County in July 2003 to help EEP prioritize streams for restoration. Nearly all of the streams sampled in the Rocky River drainage had highly impervious catchments as a result of their proximity to urban and suburban areas of Charlotte. This highly impervious environment is reflected by the fact that 12 of 14 sites in the Rocky River catchment received Fair bioclassifications, while only 2 out of 6 sites in the less developed Coddle Creek catchment received bioclassifications of Fair or worse.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Slum Clearance in Havana in an Age of Revolution, 1930-65
    SLEEPING ON THE ASHES: SLUM CLEARANCE IN HAVANA IN AN AGE OF REVOLUTION, 1930-65 by Jesse Lewis Horst Bachelor of Arts, St. Olaf College, 2006 Master of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, 2012 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2016 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS & SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Jesse Horst It was defended on July 28, 2016 and approved by Scott Morgenstern, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science Edward Muller, Professor, Department of History Lara Putnam, Professor and Chair, Department of History Co-Chair: George Reid Andrews, Distinguished Professor, Department of History Co-Chair: Alejandro de la Fuente, Robert Woods Bliss Professor of Latin American History and Economics, Department of History, Harvard University ii Copyright © by Jesse Horst 2016 iii SLEEPING ON THE ASHES: SLUM CLEARANCE IN HAVANA IN AN AGE OF REVOLUTION, 1930-65 Jesse Horst, M.A., PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2016 This dissertation examines the relationship between poor, informally housed communities and the state in Havana, Cuba, from 1930 to 1965, before and after the first socialist revolution in the Western Hemisphere. It challenges the notion of a “great divide” between Republic and Revolution by tracing contentious interactions between technocrats, politicians, and financial elites on one hand, and mobilized, mostly-Afro-descended tenants and shantytown residents on the other hand. The dynamics of housing inequality in Havana not only reflected existing socio- racial hierarchies but also produced and reconfigured them in ways that have not been systematically researched.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANDHRA PRADESH METROPOLITAN REGION and URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES ACT, 2016 ARRANGEMENT of SECTIONS (ACT No.5 of 2016)
    1 THE ANDHRA PRADESH METROPOLITAN REGION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES ACT, 2016 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS (ACT No.5 of 2016) (19th January, 2016) SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Definitions CHAPTER II DECLARATION OF DEVELOPMENT AREA AND CONSTITUTION OF THE AUTHORITY 3. Declaration of Development Area 4. Constitution of the Development Authority 5. Powers and functions of the Authority 6. Powers and Functions of the Executive Committee 7. Powers and Functions of the Metropolitan Commissioner / Vice- Chairperson 8. Officers & staff and Constitution of the ‘Andhra Pradesh Metropolitan Region and Urban Development Authorities Service’ CHAPTER III UNIFIED TRANSPORT AUTHORITY 9. Constitution of Unified Transport Authority 10. Powers and functions of the Transport Authority CHAPTER IV DEVELOPMENT PLANS 11. Preparation and Content of Development Plans 12. Submission of plans to the Government for sanction 13. Sanction of plans by the Government 2 14. Power to undertake preparation of area development plan or action plan or Zonal Development plan. 15. Modification to the sanctioned plans 16. Enforcement of the sanctioned plans CHAPTER V DEVELOPMENT SCHEMES (i) Types and details of Development Schemes 17. Development Schemes (4) Types of Development Schemes (5) Power of the Government to require the authority to make a development scheme 18. Provisions of the development scheme 19. Contents of the development scheme 20. Infrastructure and amenities to be provided 21. Cost of the development scheme 22. Reconstitution of plots 23. Restrictions on the use and development of land after publication of draft development scheme 24. Disputed ownership 25. Registration of document, plan or map in connection with development scheme not required.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Development Contents
    T'1Afr -)1.1 11\1S ( Rt \IhU 1)j Vl I(.)I '1 N 1)I I (A 11()N, \NI ) I 11-\l III - Public Disclosure Authorized kYD 5Z FILE COPYi 11171 Report No.:11171 Type: (PUB) Title: THE ASSAULT ON WORLD POVERTY : ,Author: WORLD BANK Ext.: 0 Room: Dept. OLD PUBLICATION Public Disclosure Authorized .1 If~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1II TP0 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Return to BRDC, I 8 -203 ASSAULT on WORLD The ASSAU LT on WORLD POVE RTY Problems of Rural Development, Education and Health With a preface by Robert S. McNamara Published for THE WORLD BANK by THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PRESS Baltimore and London Copyright © 1975 by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 75-7912 ISBN 0-8018-1745-5 (clothbound edition) ISBN 0-8018-1746-3 (paperbound edition) iv PREFACE Among our century's most urgent problems is the wholly unaccept- able poverty that blights the lives of some 2,000 million people in the more than 100 countries of the developing world. Of these 2,000 million, nearly 800 million are caught up in what can only be termed absolute poverty-a condition of life so limited as to prevent realiza- tion of the potential of the genes with which they were born; a condition of life so degrading as to be an insult to human dignity. The collection of papers in this volume, while dealing with five related subjects, share a common theme.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Implementation Strategies
    April 20, 2009 7. Implementation Strategies 7.1 Introduction The following Implementation Strategies address the issues and opportunities raised in Chapter 5. Action items are identified, along with responsible parties and a projected timeframe for implementation. This timeframe is expressed either as Ongoing, Short-Range (one to five years), or Long-Range (five plus years). Below is a list of responsible parties and partners in this plan. Also included in this chapter is a discussion of how to implement Activity Centers, an essential element of this Comprehensive Plan and a strategy that cuts across all of the basic components of its implementation. Parties and Partners AFT American Farmland Trust ARC Atlanta Regional Commission CPHE The Commission for the Promotion of Higher Education FHA Federal Highway Administration GC Georgia Conservancy GCF Georgia Cities Foundation GDCA Georgia Department of Community Affairs GDNR Georgia Department of Natural Resources GDOL Georgia Department of Labor GDOT Georgia Department of Transportation GEPD Georgia Environmental Protection Division GRPA Georgia Rail Passenger Authority GRTA Georgia Regional Transportation Authority HBD Hampton Building Department HCBOC Henry County Board of Commissioners HCBOE Henry County Board of Education HCBD Henry County Building Department HCC Hampton City Council HCCC Henry County Chamber of Commerce HCCE Henry County Cooperative Extension HCDA Henry County Development Authority HCDOT Henry County Department of Transportation HCDPR Henry County Development Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rural Banks
    Sources of Agricultural Loans in India Agricultural credit in India is available to farmers and other people working in the farming sector in India from various sources. Short and medium term agricultural credit requirements of farmers and others employed in the agricultural sector in India are usually met by the government, money lenders, and co-operative credit societies. Farmers with long-term loan requirements, such as a long-term agri loan or a loan for agri land purchase, can avail of loans from land development banks, the Indian government, and money lenders. The National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development (NABARD) provides long- term and short-term credit to service the needs of Indian farmers at highly competitive interest rates. The sources of agricultural finance in India can be classified into two main categories, i.e., institutional and non-institutional sources. Non-institutional sources, constitute around 40 percent of total credit availed by farmers in India. The interest rate of the non-institutional agri loans is usually very high, although the land or other assets are kept as collateral in the secured loans. include entities like relatives, landlords, traders, commission agents, and money lenders. On the other hand, institutional sources include entities such as co-operatives, NABARD, and commercial banks like the RBI and SBI Group. In the following section, the various institutional sources of agriculture business loan or agriculture loan are discussed briefly. Institutional sources The key goal of institutional credit is to enable farmers to increase their agricultural productivity and, as a consequence, their income. Institutional credit doesn’t employ exploitative practices.
    [Show full text]
  • List of North Carolina Bridges
    3/31/21 Division County Number DOT # Route Across Year Built Posted SV Posted TTST 7 Alamance 2 000002 SR1529 PRONG OF HAW RIVER 1998 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 3 000003 SR1529 DRY CREEK 1954 20 29 7 Alamance 6 000006 SR1504 TRAVIS CREEK 2004 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 7 000007 SR1504 TICKLE CREEK 2009 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 11 000011 NC54 HAW RIVER 2001 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 12 000012 NC62 BIG ALAMANCE CREEK 1999 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 13 000013 SR1530 HAW RIVER 2002 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 14 000014 NC87 CANE CREEK 1929 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 15 000015 SR1530 HAW RIVER 1957 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 16 000016 NC119 I40, I85 1994 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 18 000018 SR1561 HAW RIVER 2004 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 22 000022 SR1001 MINE CREEK 1951 23 30 7 Alamance 23 000023 SR1001 STONEY CREEK 1991 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 24 000024 SR1581 STONY CREEK 1960 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 26 000026 NC62 GUNN CREEK 1949 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 27 000027 SR1002 BUTTERMILK CREEK 2004 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 28 000028 SR1587 BUTTERMILK CREEK 1986 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 31 000031 SR1584 BUTTERMILK CREEK 2005 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 32 000032 SR1582 BUTTERMILK CREEK 2012 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 33 000033 NC49 STINKING QUARTER CREEK 1980 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 34 000034 NC54 BACK CREEK 1973 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 35 000035 NC62 HAW RIVER 1958 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 36 000036 SR1613 TOM'S CREEK 1960 35 41 7 Alamance 37 000037 SR1611 PRONG STONEY CREEK 2013 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 38 000038 SR1611 STONEY CREEK 1960 33 39 7 Alamance 39 000039 SR1584 PRONG BUTTERMILK CREEK 1995 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 40 000040 NC87 BRANCH OF VARNALS CREEK 1929 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 41 000041 SR1002 STONEY CREEK 1960 34 37 7 Alamance 42 000042 SR1002 TOM'S CREEK 1960 34 38 7 Alamance 43 000043 SR1763 JORDAN CREEK 1995 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 44 000044 SR1768 JORDAN'S CREEK 1968 5 0 7 Alamance 45 000045 SR1002 JORDAN CREEK 2008 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 47 000047 SR1226 I40, I85 2004 LGW LGW This report includes NC Bridges that are less than 20' in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapporteur's Report on Institutional Framework for Agricultural Development
    Ind. in. ofAgri. Econ. Vol. 53, No. 3, July-Sept. 1998 Rapporteur's Report on Institutional Framework for Agricultural Development Rapporteur: Vasant P. Gandhi* "There is an intimate connection between the institutions and technology employed,(and) the efficiency ofa market(economy) is directly shaped by the institutionalframework." Douglass C. North (1997) Winner of Nobel Prize for Economics, 1993. INTRODUCTION It is indeed highly opportune that the Indian Society of Agricultural Economics has selected the theme of institutional framework for discussion in this Conference. Worldwide, there has been a great revival of interest in institutions and their role in economic devel- opment. The old institutionalist thinking lead by Thorstein Veblen, John R. Commons and Karl Marx, among others, apparently lost its appeal in the discipline of economics with the advent of neo-classical economics. However, the inability of the neo-classical theories and models to adequately explain the uneven growth across nations, also within nations his- torically over time, as well as the recent experiences of economic reforms in different countries including Russia, India and South-East Asia, has led to a revival of interest in the role of institutions. This has led to the emergence of new institutional economic thought (Rutherford, 1994). The school is lead by the work of economists and economic historians such as Douglass North,Robert W.Fogel, Ronald Coase and Oliver E. Williamson,amongst others. While there are many similarities between the old and the new institutionalist thinking, one of the major differences is the ability of the new institutionalists to bring institutions within the frame of accepted economic theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Williams, K., 1999
    4.5 PSP Cover Sheet (Attach to the front of each proposal) Proposal Title: Riparian Corridor Acquisition and Restoration Assessment _____________________ Applicant Name: Bureau of Land Management, Redding Field Office ____________________ Mailing Address: 355 Hemsted Drive Redding. CA 96002 ________________________________ Telephone: (530) 224-2100 ______________________________________________________ Fax: (530) 224-2172 ___________________________________________________________ Email: [email protected] (Kelly Williams) ___________________________________________ Amount of funding requested: $ 2,200,00 for ___2 years Indicate the Topic for which you are applying (check only one box). £ Fish Passage/Fish Screens £ Introduced Species T Habitat Restoration £ Fish Management/Hatchery £ Local Watershed Stewardship £ Environmental Education £ Water Quality Does the proposal address a specified Focused Action? x yes _______no What county or counties is the project located in? Shasta and Tehama Counties ________________ Indicate the geographic area of your proposal (check only one box): T Sacramento River Mainstem__________ £ East Side Trib: _______________________ £ Sacramento Trib: ____________________ £ Suisun Marsh and Bay £ San Joaquin River Mainstem £ North Bay/South Bay: __________________ £ San Joaquin Trib: ___________________ £ Landscape (entire Bay-Delta watershed)_____ £ Delta:_____________________________ £ Other:________________________________ Indicate the primary species which the proposal addresses (check all that apply):
    [Show full text]
  • Fiftieth Annual Report
    FIFTIETH ANNUAL REPORT 2009-2010 NATIONAL COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURE & RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS’ FEDERATION LTD. 701, BSEL TECH PARK, A Wing, Opp. Railway Station, Vashi, Navi Mumbai - 400 703 Telephone (Office): 27814114 / 426 /226 • (M.D.): 27814224 Telegram: BHUMIVIKAS • Guest House: 022-25514518 • Fax: 91-22-27814225 E-mail: [email protected] • Website: www.nafcard.org 2 NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE & RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS’ FEDERATION LTD., MUMBAI. ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE FEDERATION NOTICE Notice is hereby given, that the Annual General Meeting of the National Co- operative Agriculture and Rural Development Banks‟ Federation Ltd., for the year 2009-2010 will be held on Monday, August 9, 2010 at 2.15 pm at Bogmallo Beach Resort, Goa to transact the following business. 1. To confirm the proceedings of the Annual General Meeting of the Federation held on 30 September 2009 at Hotel Infiniti, Indore, Madhya Pradesh. 2. Consideration of Audited Statement of Accounts for the year 2009-2010. 3. Disposal of surplus for the year 2009-10. 4. Consideration of the Statutory Report of Auditors for the year ended 31.3.2010. 5. Consideration of Compliance Report on Auditor‟s remarks in Audit Report as on 31.3.2010. 6. Consideration of Annual Report for the year 2009-2010. 7. Appointment of Statutory Auditors for the year 2010-11 and fixing audit fees. 8. Consideration of Annual Budget for the year 2011-12. In accordance with the provisions of Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, and the Byelaws of the Federation, the General Body shall consist of one representative of each member bank of the Federation who shall be either Chairman/President or the Chief Executive or a member of the Board of the member bank nominated by the Board of Directors of the respective Bank by a resolution, or the Administrator, by whatever name called, of a member bank where there is no Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Finance for Agricultural Development an ANALYTICAL SURVEY of CRITICAL ISSUES
    FOOD POLICY ~EVIEW 1 Institutional Finance for Agricultural Development AN ANALYTICAL SURVEY OF CRITICAL ISSUES BHUPAT M. DESAI JOHN W. MELLOR INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE IFPRI FOOD POLICY REVIEWS The FOOD POLICY REVIEW series provides a forum for scholarly reviews of the literature on key topics relevant to food and agricultural policy. These works are substantive syntheses of research on major food policy issues and may include original research to supplement the discussion. They provide considered judgments on policy options in liglit of current knowledge on issues that reflect the underlying processes that contdbute to the reduction of poverty, hunger, and malnutdtion in the world. All manuscripts submitted for publication in the FOOD POLICY RE­ VIEW series undergo extensive review under the auspices of IFPRI's Publications Review Committee. The review process includes presentation of the manuscript in a fOlmal seminar and selection by the Review Committee of at least four reviewers, two of whom are external to IFPRI and two, including one from the Committee, are internal. Reviewers are chosen for their expertise in the manuscript's subject matter and method­ ology. The author responds in writing to the reviewers' comments and resubmits the manuscript to the Review Committee after making neces­ sary revisions. The Review Committee then makes its recommendation on publication of the manuscdpt to the Director General ofIFPRL With the Director General's approval, the manuscript becomes part of the IFPRI FOOD POLICY REVIEW series. IFPRI BOARD OF TRUSTEES Gerry Helleiner James Charles Ingram Chairman, Canada Australia Sjadfuddin Baharsjah Dharma Kumar Indonesia India David E.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous People Planning Framework India: Madhya Pradesh
    Indigenous People Planning Framework Document Stage: Draft for Consultation Project Number: 42486-016 November 2016 India: Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project (MPUSIP) Prepared by Government of Madhya Pradesh for the Asian Development Bank. ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BPL – below poverty line EMP – Environmental Management Plan GOI – Government of India GOMP – Government of Madhya Pradesh GRC – Grievance Redress Committee GRM – Grievance Redress Mechanism IPP – Indigenous People’s Plan MPUDC : Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited MPUIF : Madhya Pradesh Urban Infrastructure Fund MPUSIP : Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project PIU – project implementation unit PMC – project management consultants PMU – Project management unit PO (SSG) – Project Officer (Social Safeguard and Gender) NGO – non-government organization SPS – safeguard policy statement UADD - Urban Administration and Development Directorate UDHD - Urban Development and Housing Department ULB - urban local body WTP - water treatment plant WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Cum – cubic meter Ha – hectares Km – Kilometer mm – Millimeter MCM – micrograms per cubic meter NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of India and its agencies begins on 1 April and ends on 31 March. “FY” before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2016 begins on 1 April 2016 and ends on 31 March 2017. (ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This indigenous peoples planning framework is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Wagon Road of the Carolinas
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1974 The Great Wagon Road of the Carolinas Richard George Remer College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Remer, Richard George, "The Great Wagon Road of the Carolinas" (1974). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539624870. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-w0y7-0655 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GREAT WAGON ROAD OF THE CAROLIRAS A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Richard George Reiner 1974 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts HcUU 'Author Approved, August 1974 / f ? > O Q Richard Maxwell Brown . - „ v Edward M. Riley/ James Thompson sos^s TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...................................... iv LIST OF M A P S ........................................... v ABSTRACT ............................................... vi INTRODUCTION ........................................
    [Show full text]