DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 1 Khojaly. History, Tragedy, Victims

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 1 Khojaly. History, Tragedy, Victims CHAPTER 1 KHOJALY. HISTORY, TRAGEDY, VICTIMS P R E S I D E N T I A L L I B R A RY Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan CONTENTS BRIEF HISTORY OF KARABAKH ................................................................................................................. 3 INFORMATION ON THE GRAVE VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTED DURING THE COURSE OF THE ARMENIAN AGGRESSION AGAINST AZERBAIJAN .................................... 5 BRIEF INFORMATION ABOUT KHOJALY ................................................................................................. 9 THE TRAGEDY ................................................................................................................................................ 10 THE LIST OF THE PEOPLE DIED AT THE KHOJALY TRAGEDY ...................................................... 11 LIST OF FAMILIES COMPLETELY EXECUTED ON 26TH OF FEBRUARY 1992 DURING KHOJALY GENOCIDE ................................................................................................................................... 21 LIST OF CHILDREN DIED IN KHOJALY GENOCIDE ............................................................................ 22 LIST OF THE CHILDREN LOSING A PARENT AT THE KHOJALY TRAGEDY ............................... 24 THE LIST OF THE CHILDREN LOSING BOTH PARENTS AT THE KHOJALY TRAGEDY........... 28 THOUSE WHO ARE MISSING ...................................................................................................................... 29 LIST OF OFFICERS AND WARRANT OFFICERS OF 366TH REGIMENT PARTICIPATING IN THE KHOJALY GENOCIDE .......................................................................................................................... 32 WITNESSES ....................................................................................................................................................... 34 EXTRACTS FROM EVIDENCES OF THE KHOJALY WITNESSES ...................................................... 38 2 P R E S I D E N T I A L L I B R A RY Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan BRIEF HISTORY OF KARABAKH Throughout the known history the region of Karabakh has been part of the Caucasian Albania and later of different Turkic states. From 4th century B.C. to 8th century A.D. the territory of Karabakh was one of the provinces of Caucasian Albania called Artsakh (an Albanian name meaning manly Saks). After the fall of the independent Albanian state, it belonged of Sajids, in 10th century to the state of Salarids, and in 11-12th centuries - to the state of Sheddadids. During 12-13th centuries Karabakh constituted part of the Atabey-Ildenizids state, in the second half of 13th century - beginning of 15th century, during the existence of the Mongolian Khulagouid state - part of the Jalairids' state. In the 15th century it existed within the states of Garagoyunlu and Aghgayunlu, and during 16th and 17th centuries Karabakh, as a part of the Karabakh beylerbeyyat (duchy), was within the Sefevi state. The latter consisted of 4 beylerbeyyats: Shirvani, Karabakhi (also known as Ganja), Chukhursaadi (or Erivan) and Azerbaijani (or Tebriz). Karabakh, being a part of the Karabakhi beylerbeyyat, was ruled by the representatives of the Turkic Zyiadoglu tribe, subordinated to Qajars from 16th till 19th century. In the second half of the 18th century Karabakh belonged to the Karabakh khanate (principality) and along with the latter was incorporated into Russia. In 1918-20 it was part of the independent Azerbaijan and later in 1924 under the Soviets the Nogorno-Karabakh Autonomous Republic was created again within the Azerbaijan SSR. Finally, in 1988-94 Karabakh was occupied by Armenia. Since at least IV BC the population of Karabakh consisted of Caucasian Albanians (the ancestors of Azeris) and Turkic-speaking tribes of Barsil, Savir, Hunn, Khazar, Shoumlou, Bakharlou, Kangary and etc. and later Turkic speaking tribes became dominant in the region. However, until the 18th century the Albanians of today's Nogorno-Karabakh region more or less managed to save their identity. Nevertheless, after mass migrations of Armenians from Iran and Turkey to Karabakh by Russia, the Albanian population 3 P R E S I D E N T I A L L I B R A RY Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan heavily mixed with the Armenians and in a very short time was Armenized. Caucasian Albania, including Karabakh was probably the very first Christian state in the Caucasus (the Kish church in Sheki, is the oldest church in the Caucasus). Most people of Caucasian Albania converted to Islam after the Arab invasion, except the Karabakh Albanians. Like the Albanian identity, the independent Albanian Patriarchy-the Albanian church was abolished and subordinated to the Armenian Grigorian Church in 1836 by the decision of the Russian Tsarist government. Again this was due to the mass migrations of Armenians to the region, which resulted in the Albanian-Armenian assimilation. 4 P R E S I D E N T I A L L I B R A RY Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan INFORMATION ON THE GRAVE VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTED DURING THE COURSE OF THE ARMENIAN AGGRESSION AGAINST AZERBAIJAN The armed aggression of the Republic of Armenia against the Azerbaijani Republic pursuant to its policy of violent acquisition of territory and its plans to establish a "Greater Armenia" has resulted in gross and flagrant violations of human rights which fall within the category of crimes against humanity. The armed hostilities against Azerbaijan were preceded by anti-constitutional actions in the Nagorny Karabakh region of Azerbaijan perpetrated by separatist groups receiving outside support; forming the backdrop these actions were certain decisions taken by the Armenian authorities in contravention of international law. Of these decisions, the most notorious is the resolution "Reunification of the Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic and Nagorny Karabakh" adopted by the Armenian Parliament on 1 December 1989. Moreover, in Armenia's declaration of sovereignty of 23 August 1990, part of the territory of another State- the Nagorny Karabakh region of Azerbaijan - is recognized as an integral part of the Republic of Armenia. These decisions by the Armenian Parliament were enacted by its armed forces with the widespread use of mercenary bands and a sudden upsurge in terrorist activity by the Armenian special services and terrorist organizations against sovereign Azerbaijan with a view to wresting away part of its age-old lands. All-out hostilities began at the end of 1991 and the start of 1992 when Armenian armed formations initiated combat operations in the Nagorny Karabakh region of Azerbaijan using the very latest weapons systems. Since May, 1992 their armed forces have made incursions beyond the borders of the former Nagorny Karabakh Autonomous Region into other parts of the country. As a result of more than eight years of war, approximately 20 per cent of the entire territory of Azerbaijan, comprising Nagorny Karabakh and an area four times bigger than that region, has been occupied and held by the Armenian armed forces. A chronological list of the seizure of Azerbaijani towns and districts follows: 26 February 1992 - Khojaly 8 May 1992 - Shusha 18 May 1992 - Lachin 2 April 1993 - Kelbajar 28 June 1993- Agdere 23 July 1993 - Agdam 23 August 1993 Fizuli 23 August 1993 - Djebrail 31 August 1993 - Kubatly 30 October 1993 - Zangelan and Goradiz It should be noted in particular that the Agdere and Aguam districts ot Azerbaijan were seized by Armenian armed forces following the adoption of Security Council resolution 822 (1993) of 30 April 1993 which condemned the occupation of the Kelbajar district; the Fizuli district was seized after the adoption of Security Council resolution 853 (1993) of 29 July 1993 condemning the seizure of the Agdam district; and the Djebrail and Kubatly districts were seized after the adoption of Security Council resolution 874 (1993) of 14 October 1993. In its resolution 884 (1993) of 11 November 1993 the Council condemned the occupation of the Zangelan district and the city of Goradiz, attacks on civilians and bombardments of the territory of the Azerbaijani Republic. In all the above-mentioned resolutions, the Council underscored respect for the sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability of the borders of the Azerbaijani Republic, and the inadmissibility of using force to acquire territory. "It also demanded the immediate cessation of armed hostilities and hostile acts, and the immediate, full and unconditional withdrawal of all occupying forces from the occupied areas of Azerbaijan. Despite the unequivocal demands of the Security Council, the Republic of Armenia is today still holding on to occupied Azerbaijani territory and increasing its military presence there. As a result of the aggression and ethnic cleansing of Azerbaijanis from the territory of Armenia 5 P R E S I D E N T I A L L I B R A RY Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan proper and from the occupied part of the territory of Azerbaijan, there are currently over 1 million refugees and displaced persons in Azerbaijan. A total of 900 settlements have been looted and destroyed. Over 9 million square meters of civilian housing, state enterprises and social facilities have been destroyed and burnt. The total cost of the destroyed housing and the property removed therefore amounts to tens of billions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Khojaly Genocide
    CHAPTER 1 KHOJALY. HISTORY, TRAGEDY, VICTIMS P R E S I D E N T I A L L I B R A RY Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan CONTENTS BRIEF HISTORY OF KARABAKH .............................................................................................................5 INFORMATION ON THE GRAVE VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTED DURING THE COURSE OF THE ARMENIAN AGGRESSION AGAINST AZERBAIJAN....................................7 BRIEF INFORMATION ABOUT KHOJALY ........................................................................................... 10 THE TRAGEDY........................................................................................................................................... 11 LIST OF THE PEOPLE DIED AT THE KHOJALY TRAGEDY ............................................................. 12 LIST OF FAMILIES COMPLETELY EXECUTED ON 26TH OF FEBRUARY 1992 DURING KHOJALY GENOCIDE .............................................................................................................................. 22 LIST OF THE CHILDREN DIED IN KHOJALY GENOCIDE ................................................................ 23 LIST OF THE CHILDREN HAVING LOST ONE OF THEIR PARENTS AT THE KHOJALY TRAGEDY.................................................................................................................................................... 25 LIST OF THE CHILDREN HAVING LOST BOTH PARENTS AT THE KHOJALY TRAGEDY ....... 29 MISSING PEOPLE .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan Page 1 of 6
    Azerbaijan Page 1 of 6 Azerbaijan International Religious Freedom Report 2007 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The Constitution provides that persons of all faiths may choose and practice their religion without restriction; however, there were some abuses and restrictions. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the Government during the period covered by this report. Some religious groups reported delays in and denials of registration. As in previous years, there continued to be some limitations upon the ability of groups to import religious literature. Most religious groups met without government interference; however, local authorities monitored religious services, and officials at times harassed and detained members of "nontraditional" religious groups. There were some reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious belief or practice. There was popular prejudice against Muslims who convert to other faiths and hostility toward groups that proselytize, particularly evangelical Christian and other missionary groups. The U.S. Government discusses religious freedom issues with the Government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. The Embassy monitors religious freedom and maintains contact with the Government and a wide range of religious groups. Section I. Religious Demography The country has an area of 33,774 square miles and a population of 8.5 million. There were no reliable statistics on membership in specific religious groups; however, according to official figures approximately 96 percent of the population is Muslim. The remainder of the population consists mostly of Russian Orthodox, Armenian Orthodox, Jews, and nonbelievers. Among the Muslim majority, religious observance is relatively low, and Muslim identity tends to be based more on culture and ethnicity than religion.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Commemorative Events
    Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan 20 January P R E S I D E N T I A L L I B R A R Y Commemorative events America’s Azerbaijan Association calls not to forget Bloody January (21 January, 2004) ........................................ 5 Arabic world obtains information on the events of January 20 (22 January, 2004) .................................................... 6 Anniversary of the tragedy of January 20 to be marked in USA (18 January, 2006) .................................................. 7 Azerbaijani Diaspora in USA calls on world community to commemorate of the tragedy of January 20 (21 January, 2006) ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 18th anniversary of Bloody January to be marked in Sweden (12 January, 2008) ..................................................... 9 Azerbaijani embassy to Indonesia commemorates victims of Bloody January (17 January, 2008) .......................... 10 18th anniversary of Bloody January tragedy marked in USA (19 January, 2008) .................................................... 11 Azerbaijan permanent representative office to UN marks 18th anniversary of the tragedy of January 20 (19 January, 2008) ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 Victims of Bloody January commemorated in Spain (19 January, 2008) ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Ms. Dziunik Aghajanian, Adviser Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia in the Exercise of the Right of Reply
    PC.DEL/720/10 2 July 2010 OSCE HIGH-LEVEL CONFERENCE ON TOLERANCE AND NON-DISCRIMINATION ENGLISH only Astana, 29-30 June 2010 Session 7: Strategies for promoting tolerance and understanding, interethnic and intercultural dialogue including its religious dimension, in the OSCE area Statement by Ms. Dziunik Aghajanian, Adviser Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia in the exercise of the Right of Reply Madame Moderator, It is saddening to see this forum misused by our distinguished key-note speaker from Azerbaijan (Mr. Hidayat Orujov) by raising political issues related to the resolution of the Nagorno Karabagh conflict which is not the topic of our discussion today. Given the comments made, I am forced to reply reminding the distinguished delegate and all Participating States that Nagorno Karabagh conflict is NOT of a religious nature, and all efforts by Azerbaijan to depict it as such have been futile. As for the fabricated accusations of aggression and occupation against Armenia, I would like to refresh the memory of our colleagues that it was Azerbaijan that unleashed a full-scale war against the Armenian population of Nagorno Karabagh in 1992, as a response to their legitimate calls for self-determination, with the mere intent of cleansing the whole Armenian population of the region, as they succeeded in Nakhijevan, Sumgait, Kirovabad/Gyanja and Baku. I would like to remind that the Armenians of Nagorno Karabagh were put under Azerbaijani SSR rule by the unilateral decision of Stalin against the explicitly expressed opposition of its population, out of divide-and-rule policy. Concerning the results of the Azerbaijani war of aggression, the territories that came under control of the Nagorno Karabagh authorities serve as a security belt and a guarantee until the time when Azerbaijan truly negotiates a peaceful solution in the peace talks and not resorts to blackmail by violating the ceasefire regime and relying on the use of force.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Pluralism and the State of Azerbaijan
    RELIGIOUS PLURALISM AND THE STATE OF AZERBAIJAN Dobrosława Wiktor-Mach Introduction Since the 1970s, religion has been re-emerging as a pow- erful social, cultural and political force all over the world. ”De-privatization” of religion, as described by Jose Casa- nova, means that in previously secularized societies reli- gion is leaving a private niche and re-gains public reso- nance1. The religious revival frequently triggers a process of disconnecting religion from ethnicity. Some national- istic movements change their rhetoric and incorporate religious symbols in their discourse. An increasing num- ber of Muslims find a global identity of Islamic Ummah more attractive than a local ethnic or tribal attachment. The deprivatization of religion presents a challenge to society, state, and religious communities. ”Post-sec- ular” societies deal with a rather unexpected comeback of religious discourse and practice in the public sphere2. This concept usually refers to the Western world, but it can be also applied to former communist republics that were forced in the previous century to adopt an atheistic model of renouncement of public religion. The notion “ post-secular” is employed by Habermas to refer to a change in public consciousness − people in post-secular societies have to deal with a re-appearance of religious 147 norms and ideas in non-religious spheres (education, health care, law, etc.) and to debate the extent of religion that can be incorporated without undermining the core rules of modern and liberal state. This article intends to contribute to the debate on reli- gion in the public sphere and religious rights by focusing on the process of pluralisation as a part of the religious re- vival phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • REPUBLIC of AZERBAIJAN on the Rights of the Manuscript ABSTRACT
    REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN On the rights of the manuscript ABSTRACT of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy THE MAIN DIRECTIONS OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN IN THE THEORETICAL LEGACY OF HEYDAR ALIYEV Specialty: 5908.01 - "Political theory" Field of science: Political science Applicant: Maftuna Rashid Abdullayeva Baku – 2021 The work was performed at the Department of Political Science and Sociology of Baku State University. Scientific supervisor (consultant): Ali Javad Ahmedov PhD in Philosophy, professor Official opponents: Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor Aida Mammad Yusifzade Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor Rena Rza Mirzazade PhD in Political Science, Associate Professor Rajab Zakir Rahimli Dissertation Council FD 2.30 of Supreme Attestation Commission under the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan operating at the Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan Chairman of the Dissertation council Doctor of Biology, Academician _____________ Urkhan Kazim Alakbarov (signature) Scientific secretary of the Dissertation council Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor _____________ Ziyafat Ziya Habibova (signature) Chairman of the scientific seminar Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, professor _____________ Alikram Zakir Abdullayev (signature) 2 Introduction Relevance of the topic: After gaining independence, the Azerbaijani state faced the need to pursue domestic and foreign policy, which allows it to build a democratic, legal and secular state.A correct understanding of national interests, the choice of the optimal course of domestic and foreign policy of the state have become a vital national need.The realization and maintenance of national interests required the creation of security conditions and the formation of its foundations.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe Report, No. 191: Azerbaijan
    AZERBAIJAN: INDEPENDENT ISLAM AND THE STATE Europe Report N°191 – 25 March 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 A. THE SECULAR TRADITION.....................................................................................................1 B. TERRORISM CONVICTIONS ....................................................................................................2 II. FOREIGN INFLUENCES............................................................................................. 5 A. MIDDLE EAST .......................................................................................................................5 B. DAGESTAN AND CHECHNYA .................................................................................................6 C. IRAN .....................................................................................................................................7 D. TURKEY ................................................................................................................................8 III. INDEPENDENT ISLAMIC GROUPS....................................................................... 10 A. SALAFI GROUPS ..................................................................................................................10 1. Baku.........................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • COJEP Int. Report Azerbaidjan Armenia 2020
    New military clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan REPORT On the civilian casualties and destructions caused by attacks of Armenia on densely populated areas of Azerbaijan between 27 September – 28 October 2020 28 October 2020 October 2020 COJEP INTERNATIONAL INTRODUCTION Background The Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict is one of the longest-standing protracted conflicts in the region, which has been going on for nearly 3 decades. As a result of this, the Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan and 7 adjacent districts of Azerbaijan, namely Lachin, Kalbajar, Aghdam, Fuzuli, Jabrayil, Gubadli and Zangilan, were occupied by Armenia. The conflict affected the lives of over a million of Azerbaijanis who lived in the Nagorno-Karabakh region and 7 adjacent districts of Azerbaijan, causing a number of social, economic and humanitarian problems. The above-mentioned 7 districts are not a part of the Nagorno-Karabakh region. The total area of Nagorno-Karabakh region is 4400 km2, while the total area of 7 districts is almost 3 times larger (11.000 km2). More than 90% of the total number of IDPs (which is more than 1 million) represent those 7 districts. It should also be mentioned that the number of Azerbaijani people forced to leave the Nagorno-Karabakh region is now 86 thousand people. It is the attention capturing fact, that the number of IDPs only from Aghdam (191.700 people) is larger than of the Nagorno-Karabakh region (the overall number of Armenians, Azerbaijanis and other nationalities populating this territory before the conflict was 189.085 people). So, the population of 7 districts is almost 5 times more than of Nagorno- Karabakh itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan: Independent Islam and the State
    AZERBAIJAN: INDEPENDENT ISLAM AND THE STATE Europe Report N°191 – 25 March 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 A. THE SECULAR TRADITION.....................................................................................................1 B. TERRORISM CONVICTIONS ....................................................................................................2 II. FOREIGN INFLUENCES............................................................................................. 5 A. MIDDLE EAST .......................................................................................................................5 B. DAGESTAN AND CHECHNYA .................................................................................................6 C. IRAN .....................................................................................................................................7 D. TURKEY ................................................................................................................................8 III. INDEPENDENT ISLAMIC GROUPS....................................................................... 10 A. SALAFI GROUPS ..................................................................................................................10 1. Baku.........................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • AZERBAIJAN Executive Summary The
    AZERBAIJAN Executive Summary The constitution provides for religious freedom; however, other laws and policies restricted religious freedom in practice. Most religious groups met without government interference; however, authorities reportedly monitored and raided some religious services, confiscated religious materials, and harassed and detained some members of Muslim and Christian groups. The government considers some of these groups “nontraditional” because they lack a long history in the country. There are also burdensome registration requirements for religious groups that the government enforced. Legislation passed during the year increased restrictions on religious groups. However, in practice, the government did not demonstrate a trend toward either improvement or deterioration in respect for and protection of the right to religious freedom. There were reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. There was occasional hostility toward groups that proselytized, particularly Jehovah’s Witnesses, evangelical Christians, and other missionary groups. As part of its overall policy to promote and defend religious freedom, the U.S. government discussed religious freedom with the government, various nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and religious leaders. Section I. Religious Demography Approximately 96 percent of the population is Muslim, with the remainder consisting mostly of Russian Orthodox, Armenian Apostolic, followers of other Christian groups, Jews, and nonbelievers. Approximately 65 percent are Shia and 35 percent are Sunni, according to the State Committee on Work with Religious Associations (SCWRA), the government body tasked with implementing policy on religious issues, enforcing relevant regulations, and interacting with religious organizations. Christians are mainly concentrated in Baku and other urban centers. The majority of Christians are Russian Orthodox whose identity, like that of Muslims, tends to be based more on culture and ethnicity than on religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports of Local and Foreign Ngos on International Crimes Committed by Armenia During the Patriotic War (September 27 - November 10, 2020)
    REPORTS of local and foreign NGOs on international crimes committed by Armenia during the Patriotic War (September 27 - November 10, 2020) Baku-2020 Reports of local and foreign NGOs on international crimes committed by Armenia during the Patriotic War (September 27 - November 10, 2020) Baku-2020. 364 pages. The book contains 12 reports on international crimes committed by Armenia against Azerbaijan during the Patriotic War, including 9 reports by local non- governmental organizations and 3 reports by foreign non-governmental organi- zations. The information is reflected in these reports on Armenia's use of weapons and ammunition prohibited by international conventions against civilians and civilian infrastructure in Azerbaijani towns and villages, deliberately killing people living far from the conflict zone, especially women and children, use terrorists and mercenaries in military operations, and involve children in hostilities, and facts about the pressure on the media and the constant suppression of freedom of speech, the destruction and appropriation of material, cultural, religious and natural monuments in the occupied territories, as well as looting of mineral re- sources, deforestation, deliberate encroachment on water bodies and the region to the brink of environmental disaster. Contents Patriotic War: REPORT on the causes of the outbreak, its consequences and the committed crimes 4 REPORT on the use of prohibited weapons by the armed forces of Armenia against the civilian population of Azerbaijan 26 REPORT on intentional killing,
    [Show full text]
  • The Khodjaly Genocide
    HAVVA MAMMADOVA THE KHODJALY GENOCIDE Azərbaycan Respublikası Prezidentinin İşlər İdarəsi P R E Z İD ^ J i^ A B X A N A S I Baku-200a RESULTS OF ARMENIAN AGGRESSION Occupied territories of Azerbaijan Daghlig-Garabagh region Shusha district Territory - 4 388 sq.km Territory - 289 sq.km Population (1989) ■ 189 085 Population (1989) • 20 579 Armenians -145 450(76.9%) Azerbaijanis -19036(92.5% Azerbaijanis • 40 688 (21,5%) Armenians - 1 377(6.7%) Russians ■ I 922(1%) Occupied - May 8.1992 Others • 1025 (0.6%) Districts outside Daslilia-Garabanh rem it Occupation Expulsion Occupation Expulsion Lachin -May 18.1992 - 71000 Jabrayil - August 23.1993 - 66000 KalMar -April 2.1993 -74 000 Gubadly - August 31.1993 - 37 900 Aghdam -Julv23.1993 -165 600 Zancilan - October 29.1993 - 39 500 Fizuli - August 23.1993 -146000 Victims of aggmion Killed - 20 000 Disabled - 50 000 Missing - 4 866 Destructions and damage Settlements -890 Museum Exhibits -40 000 Houses - 150000 Industrial and Agricultural Enterprises -6000 Public Buildings - 7 000 Motor Ways -800 km -3 | i n tbt oaupied territories lempnran RrfnfetflDP Schools -693 Bridges -160 CL Refugee* from Armenia Tamils ,4ft Amllen • 322 settlements Kindergartens -855 Water Pipelines -2 300 km А О ’ Я24 (Vrsnanrl • 50 Util ll)P lent ramps Internal!) displaced persons from Health Care Facilities -695 Gas Pipelines Stlllers tllet.ilb transferred In the « П р Ы tcmtirnes -20110 km (he occupied territories 660000 Daghlie (ijuhieh ■ 8 500 Ornipunl territerirs Libraries -927 Electricity Lines - 15000 km Iairmail) dwpUccd pcrvws fmm regums -1 no 000 ladim ПОИ I Temples -44 Forests - 280 000 ha along the hinder »ith Armenia and kalbaia; ?0U line of iH-iupuliiin line of (Kcupatioa /angılan -53) Mosques -9 Sowing Area -1000 000 ha Jabrayil •Ä) Vdmin.
    [Show full text]